HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-12-05-SC-min Page 164
December 5, 1978
The Lexington School Committee meeting was held on Tuesday,
December 5, 1978, at 8:00 p.m. at the School Administration Build-
ing. Those in attendance were: Brown, Swanson, Hoffman, Michelman,
Gaudet, and student representative Mende. Also present were: Law-
son, Spiris, Maclnnes, Pierson, Monderer, Barnes.
It was MINUTES
11/21/78
VOTED: to accept the minutes of November 21, 1978 as amended.
It was EXECUTIVE
SESSION MINUTES
VOTED: to accept the executive session minutes of October 3, 1978 10/3/78
as presented. (Michelman, Hoffman, Unanimous)
It was EXECUTIVE
SESSION MINUTES
VOTED: to accept the executive session minutes of November 21, 11/21/78
1978 as presented. (Michelman, Gaudet, Unanimous)
Upon the recommendation of the Superintendent of Schools, it was SCHEDULE OF
PAYMENTS
VOTED: to accept the following schedule of payments: (Michelman,
Gaudet, Unanimous) (See attached sheet.)
Dr. Lawson noted that he had been in conversation with Mr. Jones CHILD ABUSE
of Palmer and Dodge who felt that a review of the language of the State POLICY
law prior to a Lexington vote on a formal child abuse policy was need-
ed. The Superintendent suggested that the policy be delayed until the
next meeting.
Upon the recommendation of the Superintendent of Schools, it was PERSONNEL CHANGES
(PROFESSIONAL)
VOTED: to accept the following personnel changes (professional) :
(Gaudet, Michelman, Unanimous)
PERSONNEL CHANGES - PROFESSIONAL
EXCHANGE WITH EDCO
RESIGNATION
YRS. IN LEXINGTON EFFECTIVE REASON
MEDICAL DISABILITY PAYMENT FOR MATERNITY UNDER SICK LEAVE
SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS
The following schedules of payments were available for scrutiny and
approval prior to this meeting:
SCHOOL DEPARTMENT BUDGETS
Personal Services
November 17, 1978 'Professional Payroll #10 $423,017.27
November 24, 1978 Classified Payroll #120 71,660.18
Personal Services(Carr7-Over)
November 17, 1978 Professional Payroll 8,629.21
Expenses
November 24, 1978 Bill Schedules #81 1,281.86
November 24, 1978 #82 2,103.04
November 24, 1978 #83 10,726.22
November 24, 1978 #84 48,736.70
November 24, 1978 #85 409.56
December 1, 1978 #86 2,171.70
December 1, 1978 #87 2,174:63
December 1, 1978 #88 8,424.97
December 1, 1978 #89 21,368.50
December 1, 1978 #90 11,717. 14
Expenses (Carry-Over)
November 24, 1978 Bill Schedule #235 44.97
SPECIAL PROGRAMS NON-LEXINGTON FUNDS
Adult Education
November 17, 1978 Professional Payroll 946.36
Driver Education
November 17, 1978 Professional Payroll 1,156.08
METCO
November 24, 1978 Classified Payroll #6C 1,527.09
November 17, 1978 Professional Payroll 5,934.21
TRANSITION
November 24, 1978 Bill Schedule #4 698.90
P.L. 94 - 142 Grant - Transition To Employment
November 17, 1978 Professional Payroll 1,465.77
November 24, 1978 Classified Payroll if6C 81.84
(over)
SPECIAL PROGRAMS -(Non-Lexington Funds)
Title I P.L. 89-313-SPECIAL EDUCATION
November 17, 1978 Professional Payroll 529.41
Driver Education
November 24, 1978 Bill Schedule #2 177.03
Low Income
November 24, 1978 Bill Schedule 81.25
Bus Tickets
November 24, 1978 Bill Schedule 1,438.50
Page 165
December 5, 1978
ADULT EDUCATION SALARIES - 1978-79
Director - $2,199.60 annually
Staff - $ 8.42 per hour
DRIVER EDUCATION SALARIES - 1978-79
Director - $1,770.00 annually
Staff - $ 7 .60 per hour (Behind-the-wheel training)
$ 8.77 per hour (Classroom instruction)
Upon the recommendation of the Superintendent of Schools, it was PERSONNEL CHANGES
(CLASSIFIED)
VOTED: to accept the following personnel changes (classified) (sub-
ject to change upon completion of negotiations) : (Michelman,
Swanson, Unanimous)
PERSONNEL CHANGES - CLASSIFIED
RETURN FROM LEAVE OF ABSENCE
LEAVE OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY
TRANSFERS
NEW PERSONNEL
Effective: 11/27/78
*Subject to change upon completion of negotiations.
Upon the recommendation of the Superintendent of Schools, it was BIDS -
FOOTBALL EQUIPMENT
VOTED: to award the bid for football equipment reconditioning to RECONDITIONING
Sportcraft Company as indicated as follows as the low bid-
der meeting specifications: (Michelman, Gaudet, Unanimous)
Page 166
December 5, 1978
BIDS - 1978 FOOTBALL EQUIPMENT RECONDITIONING
On November 10, 1978 requests for bids for reconditioning of
football equipment were invited from two companies. The bid was
also advertised in the November 16, 1978 issue of the Lexington
Minute-Man.
Specifications were drawn for the repair and reconditioning
of seven items with a per item price for additional charges for
specific parts, if their replacement is needed. The approximate
quantities were based on previous experience.
Two sealed bids were received and opened at a public reading
at 1:30 p.m. on Monday, November 27, 1978.
A recap of the bid is as follows:
Item Phil Murray Co. ,Inc. Sportcraft,Co. Last Year's
1. Helmets - Recond. Unit Total Unit Total Bid Price
Clean & Sterilize 3.75 750.00 3.75 750.00 3.75
Specific replace- 5.00 3.00 2.70
ment parts to 10c 1511.25 to 25c 989.25 to 10c
17 items
2. Shoulder Pads
Clean & Sterilize 3.50 612.50 5.25 918.75 2.95
& Replace parts plus parts
3. Thigh Guards - Clean
only .40 80.00 .25 50.00 .10
4. Knee Pads - Clean only .30 60.00 .25 50.00 .10
5. Girdle Pads-Clean only 1.50 300.00 .15 30.00 .50
6. Hand, Forearm, Elbow
Pads - Clean only .50 50.00 .25 25.00 .10
7. Pants - Sew & Replace
Pockets 4.00 200.00 3.50 175.00 2.00
Total Estimated Cost
*Not inc. item #7 3563.75 2988.00
Sportcraft has been a successful bidder in the past and performed
satisfactorily.
The budget for this service is $2,600. The above totals $2,988.
This is an approximate total and will increase or decrease with the
actual number of pieces to be cleaned or reconditioned. In the event
that we do exceed the budgeted amount, the difference will be trans-
ferred from other accounts within the athletic budget.
Dr. Monderer presented the final report of the Elementary and FINAL GUIDANCE
Junior High School Guidance Program Evaluation. He stated that prin- REPORT
cipals and counselors reviewed the data for the system and for their
schools. He described actions to be applied in the individual schools.
Dr. Monderer noted that the evaluation reflected a high general satis-
faction of parents, students, and teachers, and felt it was a mandate
to continue the basic elements of the program being provided. He ad-
ded that he felt the program could be enhanced by actions designed to
improve the lowest rated areas.
Page 167
December 5, 1978
Mr. Michelman asked Dr. Monderer if he agreed with the statement
in the Massachusetts Department of Education policy on guidance that
counselors should be in the forefront of eliminating stereotypes. Dr.
Monderer said that it was not a priority in a counselor's role, but
felt they should be knowledgeable of the law and do all they could to
foster improved human relations.
Mrs. Swanson said she felt that it would be extremely informative
to the School Committee if Dr. Monderer would provide the numbers of
students serviced by each counselor at each level rather than the sub-
mission of a ratio for each level.
Mrs. Gaudet stated that counselors indicated that the ratio of stu-
dents to counselor was too high. She wondered why then counselors were
augmenting a program which included parent counseling.
Dr. Monderer said that every counselor had a load which assumed
not only counselor responsibilities for the student represented by the
ratio, but also assumed that the counselor would work with parents and
teachers as well. Often the work the counselor performed with parents
and teachers was critical to helping students. To the extent to which
parents or teachers could become more effective in their relationships
with the students, the greater impact there could be on the performance
of students.
Mrs. Swanson added she felt some of the counselors were not quali-
fied to perform some of the rolesthey were being asked to perform (ex-
ample-involvement in social work) . She asked if counselors received
training in areas such as Chapter 622. She also asked if anyone was
sure that counselors had been trained to handle such problems. Dr.
Monderer responded that some of the counselors were trained in social
work and some were more trained in areas such as Chapter 622/Title IX
than others.
Dr. Lawson added that the focus of the guidance program was not
remediation but preventive, and felt this certainly should be kept in
mind when reviewing the entire program.
Mr. Hoffman said that during the Educational Program Study Com-
mittee review, staff and parents had expressed noticeable gaps in per-
ception within the system (skills and knowledge) ; instructional areas
vs. aiding in judgment of values, etc. Mr. Hoffman also suggested that
the next questionnaire include such items as 1) "Do you know if you,
the student, has an assigned counselor?" 2) "Do you confer with a
counselor at the High School?"
Mr. Brown stated that it was his understanding that parents and
staff would have input into the High School questionnaire as it was de-
veloped. Dr. Monderer responded in the affirmative and noted that the
Advisory Committee on Guidance would be very involved in the final High
School questionnaire.
Dr. Lawson added that during the present year, parents of elementary
and junior high school students had returned the questionnaire without
Page 168
December 5, 1978
first receiving a program description. He noted that the High School par-
ents would have the benefit of having a description of the program prior to
the questionnaire. He suggested that next Spring or Fall a survey be con-
ducted at the elementary and junior high school levels after receipt of
the year' s program descriptions.
Dr. Pierson presented curriculum materials for racial awareness that RACIAL AWARE-
were developed in a workshop this past summer, and was funded by the METCO NESS MATERIALS
program. He noted that the initiation for the curriculum began with a
group of parents who were concerned that the elementary school program
needed activities that would foster better understanding of racial and
other human differences. He noted that the materials were developed by
three teachers, a principal, counselor and social worker; and would be
piloted by the workshop participants during the 1978-79 school year. He
added that after the materials were evaluated and changes made, recommen-
dations would be forthcoming that would emphasize systemwide use during
the 1979-80 year at the fifth and sixth grade level. He said workshops
would be conducted in the Winter of 1978 and during the Fall of 1979.
Pauline Black, social worker, reviewed highlights of the Racial
Awareness materials, and noted that the cirruculum materials focus more
on human differences than racial awareness.
Members of the School Committee suggested that the title might be
changed in the next phase of development to note a broader implication
of the curriculum materials of human differences. Dr. Pierson said it
would be taken under consideration.
Members of the School Committee suggested that the title might be
changed in the next phase of development to note a broader implication
of the curriculum materials of human differences. Dr. Pierson said it
would be taken under consideration.
The Superintendent stated that a letter from the Massachusetts TITLE I AUDIT
Department of Education, Bureau of External Audit, noted that Lexing-
ton' s expenditures in the area of E.S.E.A. , Title I were in conformity
with federal regulations, and that the audit was closed.
Dr. Monderer presented an information memo which noted the follow- FOLLOW-UP OF
up of the senior class of 1978 as to the type of institutions that stu- SENIORS
dents were planning to attend upon graduation. It was also noted that
a follow-up of actual placements would be of great benefit to the system.
The Superintendent said that he felt that Pupil Services planned to ex-
ecute such a study in the near future.
A communication was read from Mayor Mann of Newton who requested CHAPTER 70
support from the School Committee for legislation intended to protect AID
school systems against erosion of state aid by inflation and that would
continue the increase of Chapter 70 aid to school systems, and petition
the governor to guarantee to grant such funding beyond 1979 for education.
Mr. Brown said that he would be in contact with Mayor Mann to see
if Committee approval was sought or individual letters would be as ef-
fective. It was the consensus, however, to support the proposal in or-
der to protect funding against advancing inflation. It was suggested by
Page 169
December 5, 1978
the Superintendent that Mr. Brown suggest to Mayor Mann, the Committee
supported working with Newton and other committees so that towns and
cities may receive sufficient State funds to support State mandated
educational programs and also by working together communities would
get funds to which they were entitled.
Student Advisory Couwuittee member, Paul Mende, introduced new mem- STUDENT ADVISORY
bers of the Student Advisory Committee. School Committee members sug- COMMITTEE
gested that regular meetings be held with the Student Advisory Committee.
It was
VOTED: to convene in executive session at 10:20 p.m. on matters relating
to collective bargaining strategy. (Michelman, yes; Hoffman, yes;
Gaudet, yes; Swanson, yes; Brown, yes)
The Chairman announced that the School Committee would not be com-
ing out of executive session.
Respectfully submitted,
Richard H. Barnes
Recording Secretary
/c