HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-07-09 BOS-min Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 1 of 20
SELECTMEN'S MEETING
Monday, ,July 9, 2018
A meeting of the Lexington Board of Selectmen was called to order at 6:30 p.m. on Monday,
,July 9, 2018 in the Selectmen's Meeting Room of theTown Office Building. Ms. Barry, Chair-,
Mr. Pato; Ms. Ciccolo; Mr. Lucente and Ms. Hai were present as well as Ms. Axtell, Assistant
Town Manager; Ms. Siebert, Recording Secretary. Mr. Valente, 'Town Manager, was absent.
Selectmen Concerns and Liaison Reports
Ms. Barry thanked the Lions Club for another spectacular 4 Ih of,July fireworks show and
carnival; Mr. Lucente thankedTown departments and staff for assistance with these annual
events. This year marks the 62 d year of the carnival.
Ms. Barry reported that she has met with Anne Eccles, Chair of the Historic Districts
Commission and the ad hoc 40C Study Committee. Ms. Eccles plans to present a request to the
Selectmen at the ,July 23, 2018 meeting to revise the ad hoc Committee's name, charge, and
membership. 'The goal is for the ad hoc Committee to complete its work in time for 2019 Annual
Town Meeting.
Ms. Barry, Mr. Pato, Mr. Lucente, and Ms. Hai will visit theTown of Duxbury's crematorium on
,July 10, 2018 for an informational tour.
Ms. Hai noted that later in the meeting, the Selectmen will vote to sign a Proclamation in support
of transgender rights, proffered by the Human Rights Committee (HRC). 'The HRC feels it
important for theTown to make its position clear in advance of a November 2018 ballot question
about a statewide repeal of transgender rights.
A
Xnrove Speed Limit Reduction-_ ar
_S in Street
--&- —
In January 2018, the Board of Selectmen requested permission from the Massachusetts
Department ofTransportation (MassDOT) to reduce the speed limit on Spring Street from 35
mph to 30 mph. MassDOT approved the request and Board action is now required. David
Kucharsky. Assistant Planner, noted that the State's policy is to set speeds on an entire roadway
rather than on just a section; MassDOT determined that the currently unfrosted segment of Spring
Street from the Waltham Town line to Route 2 should be posted at 35 mph, meaning that the
formerly unfrosted segment would go from 25 mph, the 'T'own's default speed limit, to 35 mph,
Mr. Pato deemed the speed limit increase from 25 to 35 mph unfortunate but otherwise saw merit
in the reduction from 35 to 30 mph. Ms. Hai agreed, noting that the segment being decreased is a
walk.-to.-school zone for both the Bridge Elementary School and the Clarke Middle School.
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve and sign the
Special Speed Regulation 158.-D for Spring Street, from Marrett Road to the Waltham City line.
Review Data Related to Visitors Center Rental Qf�Sacg
MelissaTintocalis, Economic Development Director, and ,lim Shaw, President of the Lexington
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 2 of 20
Chamber of Commerce, presented follow-up information requested by the Selectmen regarding
Chamber of Commerce rental rates in the new Visitors Center. Also present from the Chamber
were Executive Director Molyna Richards, Treasurer Veronica Tamburrini.-Caira, and Secretary
FredJohnson.
Ms. Tintocalis referred to a compiled list of Lexington Center office space rental rates and asked
the Selectmen to comment about the proposed Chamber of Commerce rate of$300/month (for
approximately 145 square feet).
Mr. Lucente approved of the plan and deemed the rate fair. He emphasized the value of the
Chamber's contributions to Lexington's economic development. Mr. Pato and Ms. Barry were
happy the data confirms that the proposed rate is in line with other Center rental pricing. Ms.
Ciccolo said having the Chamber at the Visitors Center continues a desired synergy.
Ms. Hai asked if the additional storage space in the basement should be included without cost.
Ms. Tintocalis reported that basement space typically does not demand the same price as
retail/office space; including it complies with best practices. Ms. Hai asked about the addendum
to the memorandum of agreement about paying off of a debt for lighting installation at a rate of
$300/month. Mr. Shaw said the rent and the lighting are two separate payments; the expense was
incurred during a time when the Chamber was experiencing financial difficulties. The Chamber
has been paying off the debt incrementally.
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve and
authorize the Town Manager to sign the License Agreement with the Chamber of Commerce
with the rent set at$300 per month.
Use of Massachusetts Avenue Sidewalk A�dacent�to Chain M�illAll�e
Ms. Tintocalis asked for Board feedback on a request to install overhead lights at the public right
of way, where Grain Mill Alley intersects with Massachusetts Avenue, although approval is
under the Town Manager's office purview. Both the Lexington Retailers Association and the
Center Committee support the overhead lighting request.
Mr. Lucente asked if tables, chairs, umbrellas, and chess/checkerboard games will be used again
this year, as they were three years ago. Ms. Tintocalis said feedback about the tables and
chess/checkerboard game is welcome but permission to put out the furnishings is under Historic
District Commission jurisdiction. An adjacent business owner would have to agree to act as
"steward" for the game pieces. The previous checker game was destroyed and another would
have to be purchased.
Mr. Pato approved of the tables, games, and lighting, saying they will successfully activate the
area. He asked that a planting boundary be put in place so that the game pieces are less likely to
roll into the street.
Ms. Barry said directly-abutting businesses expressed concerns three years ago about the
furnishings' proximity to stores. Ms. Tintocalis said the furnishings would be placed in the
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 3 of 20
public right of way controlled by the the 'Town, not in the alleyway controlled by Bank of
America and a condominium association.
Ms. Ciccolo was happy the improvements would be a draw for residents and visitors and asked if
the public pianos would return to the Center and around town.
Ms. Hai agreed that vitalizing the Center is important. She asked how re-purchase of the games
and other expenses would be covered. Ms. Tintocalis said the games, estimated to cost$350, will
come from the Economic Development department budget. 'The DPW will move the planters as
soon as the Board votes its approval; the furnishings will stay in place until the end of October,
the same timeframe as the seasonal parklet across the street.
Dawn McKenna, Chair of the 'Tourism Committee, said there have been many requests for the
pianos to return but there is currently no funding. The 'Tourism Committee has expressed safety
concerns about the game pieces, although members generally support rejuvenating the gathering
area. Ms. McKenna asked if the furnishings would block sidewalk access. Ms. Tintocalis replied
that the area has been measured/marked so the furnishings will not impede pedestrian movement.
,Jim Shaw, President of the Chamber of Commerce, added his support for the furnishings, saying
they add charrn to the Center; business owners have expressed approval.
Ms. Tintocalis thanked the Selectmen for their consensus in support of the request.
Apaoint Actin Town Manaer
Ms. Barry asked the Board, in accordance with the Selectmen.-Town Manager Act of 1968, to
approve the appointment of an ActingTown Manager effective August 4, 2018 until a newTown
Manager is hired, but no later than May 3, 2019. Ms. Barry and Mr. Lucente have been in
negotiation with Ms. Axtell, Assistant'Town Manager. 'T'erms of the agreement will come before
the Board at the next meeting on July 23, 201&
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to appoint Kelly Axtell
as ActingTown Manager effective August 4, 2018, subject to negotiating a satisfactory
employment agreement.
Close RCN Public Ascertainment H�
Mr. Pato reported the RCN public ascertainment hearing was opened on Monday,June 18, 2018,
for the purpose of reviewing RCN's performance and to hear testimony on future cable-related
needs and the interests of the Lexington Community. Written comments were accepted until
,July 2, 201&
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to close the RCN
public ascertainment hearing on Monday, ,July 9, 2018 at 7:00 p.m.
Public He cation
Ms. Barry opened the Public Hearing at 7:00 p.m.
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 4 of 20
Lemon Grass Inc. has submitted all the necessary paperwork needed to support this request,
including proof of the public hearing notification mailing.
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen vote 5-0 to approve the
application for a Change of Manager, Alteration of Premises and Change of Beneficial
Interest/Transfer of Stock, Change of DBA and Change of Corporate Structure and, upon
approval by the ABCC, issue an amended 2018 All Alcohol Restaurant Liquor License to Lemon
Grass Inc. d/b/a Love at First Bite 'Thai Kitchen & Bar.
Ms. Barry closed the Public Hearing at 7:01 p.m.
Review FYI 9-20 Board of Selectmen Goal Assi�mrngnts
Ms. Barry has assigned partners and/or individual Selectmen as leads to each of the 20 high.-
priority FY 19-20 goals. She asked the Selectmen to meet with their partners to hone/edit the
goals and narrow the list. The edits should be submitted to the Selectmen's office and the revised
list will be re.-distributed for review at the Board meeting on July 23, 201&
The Board reviewed the goals and assignments. These changes were discussed:
• Goal 410: The Selectmen's role in onboarding the new Superintendent to Schools was
deemed complete.
• Goal 429: Policy and Procedure Manual was brought into the top tier.
• Ms. Hai said transportation issues, as captured in Goal 427, should be a high priority. If
the Selectmen agree, she would assume the lead on Goal 427.
Town Mam
Ms. Axtell stated that Richard Perry has been a member of the Permanent Building Committee
since 2003. Ethics training is up-to-date.
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve theTown
Manager's reappointment of Richard Perry to the Permanent Building Committee for a term to
expire,lune 30, 2021
Consent ABenda
Water& Sewer j_Commiti-neaLs/Adustments
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve the
following Water& Sewer commitments and adjustments: Water& Sewer Commitments April
2018 Finals $ 7,642.44; Water& Sewer Adjustments per WSAB April 12, 2018 ($ 6,213A I);
Water chi Sewer Adj ustments per WSAB May 17, 2018 ($13,638 83).
0 Use of Battle Green----- Lex un Halloween Parade
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 5 of 20
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve the request
for use of the Battle Green for the annual LexFUN Halloween Parade to be held on Saturday,
October 27, 2018 from 10:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. (rain date Sunday, October 28th). The proposed
event has been reviewed and approved by Police, Fire and DPW staff. Donations from parade
attendees will support the Lexington Food Pantry.
A
2prove and Si&,n 'Trans ender Proclamation
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve and sign a
proclamation declaring theTown of Lexington's support of the Commonwealth's existing
nondiscrimination protections for transgender people.
Approve One-DayLiquor Li uor Lice
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve two
Spectacle Management requests for One.-Day Liquor Licenses to serve beer and wine at the
following events being held in the Cary Memorial Building, 1605 Massachusetts Avenue:
Cowboy ,Junkies, Wednesday, ,Iuly 18, 2018, 8:00 p.m.-11:00 p.m.; Dennis DeYoung Thursday,
,July 26, 2018, 8:00 p.m.-11:00 p.m.
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve a One.-Day
Liquor License for FoodLink to serve beer and wine at their Rescue toTable Fundraising Dinner
to be held at Church of Our Redeemer, 6 Meriam Street, on Thursday, July 26, 2018 from 5:00
1p.m. to 9:00 pr m.
Approve and Sign 1--,a le�Con�,ratulafions Letters
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to sign and send a
letter of commendation congratulating Pierce Warburton for attaining the highest rank of Eagle
in Boy Scouting.
0 Approve Minutes
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve and release
the minutes of the,loint Board of Selectmen and School Committee Meeting of May 23, 201
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to approve but not
release the Executive Session minutes of May 21, 201&
Public Hearing Inn at IIa tangs Parlc Request to Remove Liquor License Conditions
Ms. Ciccolo recused herself from this item as the Inn owner has made a financial contribution to
Ms. Ciccolo's campaign for State office.
Ms. Barry opened the Public Hearing at 7:20 p.m.
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 6 of 20
Inn at Hastings Park ownerTricia Perez.-Kennealy and attorney 'Trish Farnsworth, partner at
Lawson and Weitzen, LLP requested that the Board remove all seven conditions from the Inn's
liquor license. Ms. Farnsworth stated that, when the Inn first opened in 2012, it was new territory
for Lexington businesses so the 2013 liquor license had safeguards that, in her client's opinion,
have become unnecessary now that the inn has proven to be a responsible addition to the
community.
Ms. Perez.- Kennealy said she is proud of the work she and her team have done to establish the
Inn as the only Relais & Chateau in the Boston area. 'The Inn has also won a number of coveted
awards and distinctions. Ms. Perez.-Kennealy believes the Inn represents "economic development
in its purest sense", stating that many repeat customers are CEOs of large corporations who
conduct/may want to conduct business in Lexington. The restaurant also attracts diners from near
and far; however, many new hotels and restaurants have made staying competitive more
challenging.
Based on the inn's demonstrated ability to uphold community standards/expectations and the
need to stay competitive, Ms. Perez.-Kennealy asked that the Selectmen remove the distinctions
made between inn guests and outside restaurant customers regarding alcohol service so that all
customers may enjoy the same level of hospitality. She emphasized that she is not asking to
extend service hours on the porch, or anywhere on the outdoor grounds, past 9 p.m. as that would
disturb the quiet hours that are important to the neighborhood and inn guests. Ms. Perez.-
Kennealy also did not ask to increase the seating capacity of the restaurant which is constrained
by the size of the kitchen.
Ms. Perez.-Kennealy said the Inn always distributes parking information to its guests and no
complaints about street parking have been brought to her attention, even during weddings. Ms.
Perez.-Kennealy stated that she has made her cell phone number widely available in case of
problems and staff are stationed at the front desk of the inn, 24 hours/7 days a week. With the
exception of one abutter, no one has contacted her with concerns about the request to remove the
liquor license conditions.
Ms. Barry noted that the Selectmen received ten emails about the inn's request from residents.
The Chief of Police also submitted a written report, stating that neither the Inn nor the food
alcohol service has impacted police operations. With the exception of one individual, who has
called frequently on license compliance issues, the Inn seems to be managing their services well
and has not appeared on any over-serving reports generated by the Commonwealth. The Police
have received no parking or noise complaints.
Referencing comments made in some of the residents' emails to the Selectmen, Attorney
Farnsworth refuted suggestions that the timing of Ms. Perez.-K.ennealy's application to request
removal of the conditions was calculated to evade the public's attention. Ms. Farnsworth's office
forwarded the Inn's request to theTown on May 10, 2018 and requested a hearing date of May
21, 2018 but the Selectmen's agenda could not accommodate the date. On June 22, 2018, Ms.
Farnsworth learned the hearing would be on July 9, 2018. As required, the applicant mailed
public hearing abutter notifications within three days. Ms. Barry further explained that the Board
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 7 of 20
had felt it important for all members t®be present for the hearing; due t® absences, the full Board
has n®t met since May.
Brian Cooper, 6 Parker Street, said he is technically n®t an abutter but lives one house l®t away.
He believes it disingenuous t® say there have been n® comments and that people were informed
within three days because he did n®t kn®w of the hearing until a direct abutter told him. He has
n®t personally experienced many disturbances from the Inn and he does n®t want that t® change.
He has patronized the Inn and enjoys it but he is concerned about removing the conditions
because it chips away at what was agreed t®.
Dawn McKenna. Chair of theTourism Committee, said that the initial concern s\conditi on s were
understandable but the inn has been an economic boon t®the community and contributes
significant hotel, meals, and property taxes. Ms. Perez.-Kennealy has met and exceeded the
requirements placed upon her and has been sensitive t® neighborhood concerns. Ms. McKenna
believes that St. Brigid's church makes more noise than the Inn does and that the Inn should be
treated fairly s® it can compete and survive.
Pamela Lyons, 51 Grant Street/Center Committee member, urged the Board t® support Ms.
Perez.-K.ennealy's request. The restrictions, she believes, are n® longer needed and this kind of
business should be encouraged.
Tom Harrington, 11 Parker Street, said he was concerned at first about h®w the Inn would affect
the neighborhood and has only become more concerned, listening t® tonight's discussion. The
Inn is a commercial interest in a residential area and the language of Ms. Perez.-K.ennealy's
request is the language of commerce. He believes the compromises in the original memorandum
®1 understanding (about parking, traffic studies, and egress) were painstakingly deliberated and
should remain in effect; there have been few complaints because the conditions are in place. He
asked the Selectmen t® continue t® protect the residents.
Chris Dunham, 2006 Massachusetts Avenue, said that he regularly hears noisy people leaving
the Inn after 10 p.m. He asked for clarification ®n the different types ®1 patrons and h®w
removing the distinction would change the Inn's business practices.
Ms. Perez.-Kennealy clarified that the seating capacity of the restaurant is 54, no matter whether
an event is taking place ®r not. There is n® service of food and alcohol outside the building; the
tent is used only for wedding ceremonies, n®t for receptions.
Sarah Wondolowski, 2030 Massachusetts Avenue, has family ties t®the neighborhood and is
aware of its history. She believes the Inn is beautiful and wel I.-maintained. However, as the
mother of three young children, she is concerned about establishments that serve alcohol and the
people they draw. Since the conditions appear t®be working, they should n®t change. Her
biggest worry is people drinking ®n the porch and getting out of control and she is concerned
about the presence of alcohol near the recreational high school campus. Additionally, she
inn/restaurant patrons d® park ®n Parker Street; the busier the inn gets, the more this will happen.
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 8 of 20
Phil Hurd, 2016 Massachusetts Avenue, stated that he emailed his comments to the Selectmen
but wanted to add that he does not want the Inn to fail; Ms. Perez.-Kennealy has always been
responsive to his concerns. The bigger issue is that the Inn has been a big change for the
neighborhood: loud goodbyes in the parking lot, delivery trucks, snow removal in the pre-dawn
hours. Since the Inn opened, four of the five abutting homes have turned over. He believes the
thoughtfully-deliberated conditions are not overly burdensome and should remain.
,Jim Wilson, 43 Locust Avenue business owner, supported easing the restrictions. Ms. Perez.-
Kennealy has run the Inn responsibly and the business climate is getting more competitive.
,Jim Shaw, Publisher of the Colonial Times/Chain-nan of the Board of the Lexington Chamber of
Commerce, said the Inn is a credit to Lexington and makes extraordinary contributions to the
quality of life in town. There have been no incidents since the Inn opened. The staff is topnotch.
The Inn is simply asking for a level playing field.
Kate Colburn, 49 Forest Street/Precinct 4Town Meeting member, spoke in support of the Inn's
request, saying it is a beautiful establishment that is an asset to the town. She believes much of
the on-street parking issues stem from the churches. Because of multiple activities in the
neighborhood and at the intersection, it is unrealistic to expect a tranquil residential area. She has
not noticed that the Inn has had an adverse effect on the noise or traffic levels and feels it a
shame to hobble the Inn's ability to compete.
Fred,Johnson, Center Committee/ Lexington Chamber of Commerce Board member,
enthusiastically endorsed the request to remove the conditions, saying that the Inn and restaurant
have put Lexington on the map, nationally and internationally. The Inn, in his opinion, is an
extraordinary achievement that has demonstrated its commitment to high standards and
community responsibility.
Ruth Thomas, 10 Parker Street/Precinct 4Town Meeting member, said that she often hears that
businesses are unfairly treated but believes residents should be treated fairly as well. In general,
she believes the restrictions on the Inn's license should be kept in place, although upon review,
some might be altered/lifted. Regarding fairness, she does not know of any restaurants in
Lexington that allow their guests to wander outside with drinks.
,Jackie Potdevin, 111 Adams Street, said she would love having the Inn as a neighbor because it
is more respectful of quiet hours than many residential neighbors are. She has stayed at the Inn,
as have many of her business contacts, and all have enjoyed the experience.
Ms. Barry read a submission from Police Chief Corr regarding incidents at 2027 Massachusetts
Avenue, the address of the Inn, over the time it has been open for business:
0 2013: two fire alarms; one broken window/breaking and entering;
0 2014: three medical calls; one stolen cell phone;
0 2015: two medical calls-, five fire alarms, one parking complaint(moving van blocking a
lane; one suspicious activity (love notes on a car windshield);
0 2016: three medical calls; one hit and run vehicle damage;
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 9 of 20
0 2017: two medical calls; six fire alarms; one car alarm;
0 2018 to date: one medical call; one hit and run vehicle damage.
Ms. Perez.-K.ennealy clarified some timing details: the Inn signed the original memorandum of
understanding on May 9, 2012, two days beforeTown Meeting approved the zoning relief that
allowed the Inn to go forward. Liquor licensing was approved the next summer, ,july 2013; the
conditions of the liquor license and the memorandum of understanding are two separate
documents. Lexington's liquor laws prohibit serving alcohol without food; the Inn is careful to
adhere to this rule. Ms. Perez.-K.ennealy believes that overserving a patron is the riskiest thing
she could do as a business owner. All the Inn's bartenders/waitstaff ire TIPS trained.
Ms. Farnsworth said her client hopes that all seven conditions will be removed but is willing to
work with theTown.
Mr. Lucente, whose residence is near other establishments with liquor licenses, is sensitive to
concerns of the Inn's neighbors. Initially, he reacted negatively to the request to remove the
conditions but subsequently toured the Inn and restaurant kitchen and now sees clearly why the
seating capacity is limited to 54. The things the Inn would like to change, however, do not seem
to correlate with a need to lift all seven conditions. The ability to consume alcohol on the porch
will remain the same, no matter what the Selectmen decide; it is a matter of how it is served and
by whom.
Mr. Pato said he values the Inn and hopes it will remain successful. He does not believe,
however, that it is necessary or appropriate to lift all of the conditions. He would prefer staff to
be in control of alcohol service on the porch. He does not believe there should be an expansion
of where consumption can occur nor does he agree with potential changes of times of service,
since the times now conform with Town policy. He does not mind allowing drinks service for
Introns waiting for a table but wants to ensure people cannot come in for a drink without the
intention to dine.
Ms. Barry said she finds it bold to request remove all seven conditions. However, she would like
theTown, Inn, and residents to work together to make changes that might be appropriate.
TheTown staff comments on the conditions were reviewed. Ms. Perez.-K.ennealy noted that, in
the first condition, the staff suggestion to add the word 'tent" is unnecessary since food/alcohol
service is not done in the tent. She agreed with the staff recommendation that service on the
porch not extend beyond 9 p.m. She believes patrons could be allowed to safely take drinks to
their rooms. Suggestions re: Condition 46 are rendered moot since the seating capacity cannot
change because it is based on kitchen capacity. Ms. Perez.-K.ennealy agreed to the suggestion that
a section in condition 47 be deleted, regarding "full meal" service rather than "food" service.
Ms. Hai asked if the Inn has an occupancy limit and, if so, does it include both the Inn and
restaurant. Ms. Perez.-K.ennealy said the technical capacity of the restaurant is 90 but the
zoning/parking capacity is for 54 seats, no matter in which room/location they dine. 'The Inn may
serve 98 people over the course of a night but cannot accommodate more the 54 at any one time.
The rooms are limited to occupancy based on the number of beds.
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 10 of 20
Ms. Hai said she sees three basic revision areas: the distinction between consumption and service
on the porch; the ability to transport alcohol to the outer buildings; whether alcohol service has to
be accompanied by a "seated meal" in the dining room. Ms. Hai noted there are other restaurants
that serve alcohol in other residential areas in town: Meriam Street and Waltham Street for
example. Ensuring parity is appropriate; she agreed with eliminating the distinction between
consumption and service. She does not believe a full meal must accompany an alcoholic
beverage but she would like to retain the stipulation that allows staff alone to transport alcohol to
the outer buildings.
When polled, all four participating Selectmen agreed that some of the conditions could be lifted
or modified. Ms. Barry recommended continuing the Public Hearing on August 27, 2018. Ms.
Perez.-Kennealy said she would prefer an earlier date; Ms. Farnsworth said the discussed changes
would be easy to make and could be done now; Mr. Pato said the language amendments should
not be done on the fly; he would not approve anything not written in its final form. Ms. Hai said
she would work with Ms. Perez.-Kennealy to make the revisions, in consultation with Mr.
Valente or his designee. They will discuss how to involve the neighbors in the collaboration.
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 4-0 to continue the Public
Hearing until Monday, August 27, 201&
Udate on�27 C�Iarke Sheet Building;Pen�-nit
p
Mr. Pato reported that the Selectmen have received a number of inquiries about a twice-extended
building pen-nit for 27 Clarke Street. Previous Building Commissioner Fred Lonardo and current
Commissioner,lim Kelly both extended the pen-nit for 6-month periods because the Historical
Commission's 1.-year demolition delay prohibited the property owner/builder from acting within
the timeframe of the original pen-nit. It was noted that property owners and developers
commonly 'freeze' existing zoning by filing permit applications prior to the implementation date
of zoning changes; theTown cannot prohibit this practice and denial of the extension(s) would
be inconsistent with how similar situations have been handled in the past.
On the issue of whether the Building Commissioner's decision(s) to extend the pen-nit can be
appealed, Town Counsel has stated that the neighbors could file an appeal with the Zoning Board
of Appeals until June 30, 2018 but the deadline has passed. The filing fee for such an appeal is a
$100. 'The matter is solely within the Building Commissioner's purview. Staff is not aware of
any action theTown Manager or Board of Selectmen could have exercised.
Carol Kowalski, AssistantTown Manager for Development, said she understands the public's
frustration with the 27 Clarke Street situation. The zoning bylaw change was advertised in
,January 2017 for the 2017 Annual Town Meeting and once passed took effect,july 1, 2017.
Mr. Pato asked if the proper process was followed. Ms. Kowalski said it was, even though it is
reasonable to expect that a building pen-nit would not be issued before pending zoning changes
have taken place; in the absence of prohibition, however, it is a builder's prerogative to apply for
a pen-nit. In future, a policy could be established to prohibit issuance of a building pen-nit until
the demolition delay timeframe has elapsed. Mr. Pato asked what the procedure would be to
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 11 of 20
establish such a policy. Ms. Kowalski said that she, the Building Inspector, and a member of the
Historical Commission have met to discuss this but there are a variety of difficulties to be sorted
out. The Legislature is debating the elimination of zoning freezes; Town Counsel has begun to
look at the issue. Mr. Pato saidTown Meeting should be mindful in the future that zoning
revisions may be subverted prior to effective change dates. Mr. Kelly stated that he understands
the views of the neighbors but believes theTown would have been put in legal jeopardy if the
extensions had not been granted.
Mr. Lucente said he does not believe staff have done anything untoward in the case of 27 Clarke
Street. Builders put time and effort into developing building plans that cannot be executed
overnight. While the structure at 27 Clarke does not appear to be historically significant,
demolition delay is also a tool to protect a neighborhood. He does not believe the Selectmen
have jurisdiction over this issue; the decision to extend the pen-nit was within the duties of the
Building Commissioner. A TBA appeal was possible but the filing deadline has expired.
Ms. Kowalski said, in fairness, the neighbors did not have many days to file once they
understood the appeals process.
Ms. Ciccolo agreed the situation is unfortunate but asked to look ahead to the future. Ms. Ciccolo
noted that the demolition delay bylaw is a General Bylaw and is easier to amend than a Zoning
Bylaw.
Ms. Hai asked how a request for an extension is weighed. Mr. Kelly said the terrn used in the
Building Code is "foriust cause"; defining "just cause" would have been the root of any legal
argument. Ms. Hai said once the first extension was issued, there was no justification to deny the
second extension. The task now is to improve the process so theTown does not work against its
own best interests. She would like to see the demolition delay bylaw have more "teeth".
Kate Colburn, 49 Forest Street/Precinct 4Town Meeting member, said this issue is important.
She is not sure the original pen-nit should have been granted since the zoning changes were
already in motion. Further, she does not see any legal requirement that mandates the extensions.
Ms. Colburn referenced an FAQ document on the 'T'own's website that states building pen-nit
extensions can be denied if zoning has changed. The house that will now be built at 27 Clarke
Street will exceed zoning limitations by 2,500 SF, counter to the intent of the demolition delay
bylaw which seeks, in part, to prohibit out of scale re.-building. She believes that the Building
Commissioner protected the builder to the detriment of the neighborhood; she is aggrieved that
zoning laws, created and passed in good faith, were not enforced and were actively subverted.
She believes a review of the decisions of the case is warranted, as well as a review of the
procedures, practices, and policy directions for the entire permitting process. She believes the
neighborhood can file with the TBS until ,luly 21, 201&
Lei Shu, 34 Forest Street, asked why the building pen-nit was issued without an Historical
Commission public hearing. 'The neighborhood was also not aware that the permit had been
extended or what the process for redress was.
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 12 of 20
Susan Marinaro, 33 Forest Street, said she was present when the Historical Commission learned,
at its meeting on June 21, 2017 that a building permit had been granted six days earlier to the
owner of 27 Clarke Street. She feels let down by theTown as she was not contacted, as a
neighbor, about the status of the building pen-nit. She believes other towns require greater
accountability than she sees in Lexington's process and she believes more bite is needed in the
demolition delay bylaw so that property owners are encouraged to find alternatives to tearing
down older homes. In addition, Ms. Marinaro is unhappy that an old growth tree was taken down
for what she believes was no discernable reason.
Susan McLeish, Precinct 4Town Meeting Member/27 Clarke Street abutter, echoed Ms.
Colburn's comments. Town Meeting made a deliberate decision to limit the gross floor area
ratios for buildings. The building permit for 27 Clarke Street was submitted "under the wire" and
then extended twice, all with the express knowledge thatTown Meeting had changed the zoning
regulations. She is disappointed and disillusioned with the process and asked theTown to look
into revising or rescinding this building peitand to make sure that nothing of this sort occurs
again.
Kevin McDonald, 25 Forest Street, feels that the rules have not been equitably applied, citing
another resident who had also put time and effort into building plans, like the owner of 27 Clarke
Street, only to be told by the Historical Commission that she could not do as she hoped. Mr.
McDonald believes it reasonable to require that a demolition delay period elapse before a
building peitcan be issued.
Ms. Ciccolo asked if the building permit could be revised or rescinded. Mr. Kelly said, while he
understands the frustrations of the neighborhood and the oddities of the process, he has no
justification to rescind the building peitsince the reasons it was extended are justified.
Something can perhaps be done in the future to revise the demolition delay bylaw. Ms. Kowalski
said the Building Commissioner's authority comes from theTown Manager; the AssistantTown
Manager for Development acts as supervisor. Decisions made by the Building Commissioner can
be appealed to the Zoning Board of Appeals only.
Ms. Barry called a ten-minute recess until 9:10 p.m. The meeting was called to order again at
9:20 p.m.
ADRrove Bedford Water 6—
Arn
reeent Dave Pinsonneault, DPW Director; and Ralph Pecora, Water and Sewer Superintendent-,
presented the revised Lexington-Bedford Water agreement. 'The following amendments to the
document were made after a previous Selectman review: adjustment of cost sharing percentages
for Capital and Operating costs to 50%150%- and a clause to review the agreement every
,January. Bedford's Selectmen must approve the agreement as well.
Ms. Hai asked how the agreement affects water pressure for Lexington's Grove Street area
residents. Mr. Pinsonnault said a pressure relief valve, installed last summer on Grove Street, has
worked to keep pressure at or above a minimum of 20 PSI and can be adjusted as needed.
Bedford's water draw is one component of the Grove Street pressure drop but Lexington users
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 13 of 20
impact the pressure by running irrigation systems in the early morning hours when there is also a
spike in domestic water use. In the past, the DPW has asked for Lexington residents to agree to
a voluntary irrigation restriction for this high demand time period; the request will be renewed
this summer and the same voluntary restriction will be made of Bedford residents.
Ms. Ciccolo expressed concern that the new Grove Street development might add to the water
pressure problems in that neighborhood. She asked if Bedford would share in the cost if
Lexington requires another water tower. Mr. Pinsonnault said the water system evaluation
conducted last year foresaw no issues bringing the new development online. Cost sharing with
Bedford is for infrastructure upkeep and improvements that affect Bedford. Bedford and
Burlington are in the process of hiring the same company that assessed Lexington's system so
there will be consistency in the three towns' modeling.
Ms. Barry asked if Lexington's water pressure will be affected when Burlington connects to
Lexington's water system. Mr. Pinsonnault said Burlington's goal is to eventually connect
directly to the MWRQ system. In the past, during emergencies when Burlington has connected to
Lexington, no pressure drops have been detected.
Ms. Barry asked if the DPW has directly contacted the residents on McKeever Drive to inquire
about their water pressure. Mr. Pinsonnault and Mr. Pecora said they would follow up.
Mr. Lucente understands the water pressure issues are ongoing. He agrees that the problem is
related to irrigation system use but he is not eager to exacerbate the situation by approving
Bedford's agreement before Lexington residents' pressure problems are resolved. Grove Street
area residents are not receiving basic services. Mr. Lucente, too, is concerned about the new
Grove Street development and how it will affect an already compromised situation.
Mr. Pato noted than even if the Bedford connection is shut off, there will still problems with
Lexington's Grove Street pressure. The issue should be high-priority. Mr. Pinsonnault said the
engineering department and the consultant are looking into this. He agreed that the timing of
Bedford's draw can have an impact but Lexington's topography and Grove Street's elevation are
factors as well, as is the water pressure coming from the MWRQ.
Ms. Ciccolo asked if the age of plumbing fixtures is a factor and whether theTown should work
with residents on this. Mr. Pecora said when he visits residents in the area he will find out more
specifics. Mr. Lucente said, if fixtures were the cause, the problem would not be seasonal. Ms.
Ciccolo said theTown should do more community education about water use/conservation, and
possibly impose restrictions.
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 4-1 to approve the
Lexington .- Bedford Water Agreement as presented and authorize theTown Manager to sign
said agreement. Mr. Lucente cast the dissenting vote.
U esi 11
2date Center StreetscaRe 25% D----&
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 14 of 20
Mr. Pinsonnault provided a brief update on the Center Streetscape 25% design following input
from the public meeting on June 11, 2018. 'The working group has been processing public
questions/corn meats. Several notable focus areas for the working group include: a better
definition of construction administration costs; curb cuts for accessible walkways; examination
of safety data; maintenance; clarification of overall 25% design costs; proposed turning lane
restrictions. The Selectmen will hear a longer presentation in September. A request for 100%
design funding will be made to Special 'Town Meeting in November 2018. 'The goal is to get the
Battle Green Streetscape design aligned with the Center Streetscape project so construction of
the two, and other projects in the corridor, can be rolled together.
For the record, Ms. Barry clarified that the Board of Selectmen did not vote to eliminate the
turning lanes at either Massachusetts Avenue and Waltham Street or at Massachusetts Avenue
and Edison Way as had been indicated in a prior presentation. Mr. Pinsonnault acknowledged
this and added that Massachusetts Avenue would not be narrowed at Grant Street, contrary to
how the;June 11 drawings made it appear. No change will be made at that juncture.
Mr. Lucente asked for an explanation of the National Grid vault project at the corner of
Massachusetts Avenue and Winthrop Road. Mr. Pinsonnault said this is a necessary project that
National Grid is scheduled to do during the summers of 2018/19; traffic will be disrupted. 'The
Grant Street bridge is now out for bid but only one road lane will be closed, and perhaps only
one bike lane. Ms. Barry asked that road work on this project start after the morning rush hour.
Ms. Ciccolo asked for a presentation to be made on the results of the sidewalk materials
vibration test. Ms. Hai asked that National Grid also repair the sidewalk around the vault before
considering the project complete and asked that anyone doing similar projects in the future be
made to fix damages. Mr. Pinsonnault agreed.
Dawn McKenna, Chair of the 'Tourism Committee, said she believes that the Center Streetscape
and Battle Green Streetscape projects should be on the same timeframe. She asked that the two
projects be coordinated before they are brought toTown Meeting.
,Ion Himmel, 66 Hancock Street, attended the:June 11 Center Streetscape public meeting and said
construction logistics are important, especially because they will affect the Center businesses and
affect the bid documents. He believes escalation costs as represented are 2018 costs rather than
forecasted for the year the project will begin.
Update Battle Green Master Plan
Dave Pinsonnault, DPW Director; and Dawn McKenna, Chair of the 'Tourism Committee,
presented updates on the multiple projects included within the scope of the Battle Green Master
Plan.
'Two items require Selectmen action tonight: whether the Hayes fountain at the base of the
Minuteman Statue should be restored as a working fountain and whether an ADA viewing area
for the Belfry should be established on Clarke Street.
Mr. Pinsonnault noted that:
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 15 of 20
• Improvements to the Battle Green should have a unifying effect on the area (pathways,
lighting, benches, signage). Stabilized crush stone pathways and granite pavers will be
used for accessibility and consistency.
• Upgrades will provide accessibility for all users-,
• Features are to be chosen with historical sensitivity.
• The Historic Districts Commission approved all aspects of the Battle Green Master Plan-,
• Funding was appropriated for phases I and 2-1
• The traffic study has been completed;
• Battle Green streetscape conceptual plans have been completed along with monument
restoration plans-,
• Environmental and landscaping consultants have been hired.
• The goal is for all to be completed before the town celebration in 2025.
Mr. Pinsonnault said that the Revolutionary War Monument Obelisk and the Belfry would not be
handicap.-accessible due to terrain grades. The Commission on Disabilities reached consensus
that a viewing area along the pathway to the Obelisk would suffice. Also, if the Board approves,
there would be a viewing area/gathering space on Clarke Street for the Belfry.
Mr. Pato thanked the Commission on Disabilities for working with staff on accessibility matters.
Mr. Pinsonnault noted that the Commission acknowledged the grades are not easy for even the
fully-ailed but the viewing areas, particularly for the Belfry, will be an improvement. Ms. Hai
said it would be good to include visuals from the top of the Belfry on the information
kiosk/interpretive signs on Clarke Street.
Resident Lisa Sheffler, asked if the evergreen on the Battle Green that is decorated every holiday
season will be removed. Mr. Pinsonnault and Ms. McKenna said that tree will remain but no new
evergreens will be planted.
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 50 to authorize staff to
restore the Hayes Fountain at the base of the Minuteman Statue on the Battle Green to a working
fountain and further to authorize staff to establish the ADA accessible viewing area for the
Belfry on Clarke Street.
Review of New Fire Station and Le
Mike Cronin, Director of Facilities; and,lon Himmel, Chair of the Permanent Building
Committee, provided overviews of both projects. John Wilson, Fire Chief, Derek Bride,
Engineer Services consultant; and,leff McElravy, Architect, were also present.
New Fire Station: Mr. Cronin noted several design objectives for both the new Fire Station and
the LCP. They should be solar.-ready, have all.-electric designs, and be "resilient" to function and
protect building assets in the case of power outages.
The Fire Station, as a Level One building, must remain operational at all times whereas LCP
need only remain structurally secure. The Fire Station would require a diesel generator that could
run for three days minimum during an outage. Mr. Cronin asked the Selectmen to consider using
natural gas, instead of electricity, on a non.-emergency basis to heat the apparatus bay floor slab,
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 16 of 20
saying that opting to do so would decrease the size of the generator from 600kW to 350kW and
save $140,000 in equipment costs and $4,000 annually for operations.
Mr. Pato said he appreciated the team's due diligence in reporting possible cost savings but, in
his opinion, the amount is not enough to divert theTown from its "no fossil fuel" goal.
Ms. Barry asked where the generator would be placed and how loud it would be. Mr. McElravy
said, no matter which size, the generator would be located immediately behind the apparatus bay,
next to the employee parking area, about 75 feet from the rear property line. The smaller capacity
generator is 4 feet shorter. The generator will be enclosed but there will be some exhaust noise.
Mr. McElravy is unaware of any other all-electric apparatus bay radiant floors.
Ms. Ciccolo said she would like to adhere to the no fossil fuel goal; technology will continue to
develop that will make all-electric buildings even more practical. Some of the emails she has
received from the community have expressed surprise that the Fire Station would use any other
energy source than electricity. She asked that the team choose the cleanest possible generator
since the generator will have to be run once a week to ensure it is functional.
Ms. Hai asked if natural gas or diesel options would be necessary if solar paneling is installed
now. Ms. Cronin said a generator is needed for back-up no matter what, at least until solar power
batteries become viable.
Mark Sandeen, Chair of Sustainable Lexington, noted that although back-up generators are
needed, solar-powered buildings after Hurricane Sandy used less diesel fuel to power generators.
Jon Himmel, Pen-nanent Building Committee Chair, said the PBC did not make a unilateral
decision about the back-up fuel to be used but many on the Committee oppose using electricity
to heat the apparatus bay. The Committee thinks that 600 kW is an extremely large generator.
Also, the large generator is not manufactured by many companies, limiting competitive pricing
options.
Chief Wilson said his job is to focus on the resiliency of the building and to plan for the worst.-
case scenario. Given that, replacing a 600kW generator in a hurry is far harder than replacing a
350kW generator. He has no problem with the all-electric factor; it is the noise, size, and lack of
resiliency he is most concerned with.
Mr. Pato said the size difference between the two generators does not seem to be substantial. Mr.
Cronin said it is 4 feet shorter and I foot narrower which he believes in not negligible.
Ms. Ciccolo asked if there could be two 350kW generators rather then one 600kW. Mr. Bride
said the team did consider this but two generators would require more space and upfront
investment. Mr. Cronin said this would be an ideal solution in another circumstance where space
was not as much of an issue.
Mr. Sandeen said if resilience is the goal, two generators would be better than one and they were
individually be less noisy. Low sulfur, low particulate, or biodiesel are also available fuels.
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 17 of 20
Ricki Pappo, Precinct 2Town Meeting member/Lexington GWAC, asked if a pipeline would
need to be installed if natural gas is chosen as a fuel. Mr. Cronin said the gas main is already
there. Ms. Pappo noted that the community has made a strong commitment to combat climate
change and is under the impression that the new Fire Station is an all-electric building and this is
what it should be. The Town is planning for the future, ahead of the solar storage technology
curve. She was surprised to learn that the Hastings School has been designed with a back-up
natural gas boiler. Ms. Barry stated that the Selectmen were also surprised to learn this. Mr.
Cronin said this has always been the plan, although Hastings is otherwise an all-electric building.
He noted that the back-up generator would have to be extremely large to keep all the geothermal
well-fields warm enough to function in cold weather.
Ms. Barry asked if the School Committee is aware of the natural gas boiler planned for the new
Hastings School. Mr. Cronin said member of the School Committee attends PBC meetings and is
sure to be aware.
Mr. Himmel said, if the generator is downsized, redundancy could be achieved by having a
mobile second generator. Mr. Pato said Sustainable Lexington has recommended a mobile
generator for some time.
Mr. Lucente asked why diesel is recommended for the back-up generator. Mr. Bride said that
natural gas can be affected by earthquakes or other disruptions. Maintenance costs and lack of
competitive pricing make dual fuel a less viable alternative.
Chief Wilson said, although regulations recommend it, the floor may not need to be heated
continuously because it retains its heat for some time. A protocol to power down low priority
equipment would mean the need for the larger generator is less likely. Mr. Lucente and Mr. Pato
said this point is very important; they are now comfortable staying with the all-electric option.
Ms. Hai said she would like to pursue the idea of using two generators rather then one.
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to authorize all-electric
for the heating of the new Fire Station apparatus floor.
1,,exin ao�nChildren',s�Place: Ms. Ciccolo recused herself from the Lexington Children's Place
discussion as her parents' home is adjacent to the LCP property.
Mr. Cronin said the LCP design is, and will remain, all-electric. The building has three distinct
sections: two classroom wings with an administrative hub between them. From an asset
protection standpoint, the currently planned generator will be able to heat the two classroom
wings to 60 degrees and keep the administrative area above freezing. The new proposal would
add a $6,000 natural gas manifold/element to the VRF system to heat the administrative area and
additional divert heat to the classroom wings so that classes could be held.
Ms. Barry asked if Mr. Cronin has brought this proposal to the School Committee. Mr. Cronin
said he intends to but the Permanent Building Committee felt it appropriate to get Selectmen
feedback first.
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 18 of 20
Mr. Lucente said he is unsure why the building systems need to be able to raise the heat since
school would probably be closed in such an emergency. Mr. Cronin reported that every school
building has the capacity to be warm enough for classes during a power outage. If power is lost
during school hours, students are kept at school. Building set point temperatures of 67 degrees
will fall quickly if heat is cut off. Mr. Lucente said he is not as concerned with LLP since the
schedule is partial day and the building will be new and well-insulated. Mr. Cronin cited the
young age and developmental challenges of the LLP population. Mr. Lucente said he did not see
the urgency to add the natural gas element.
Mr. Pato said he believes building operations only requires part of the kilowatt capacity. The
DiNisco team replied that the reason the gas system is being recommended is because the VRF
system is "delicate"; if snow covered, it can stop working. It runs constantly, is prone to breaking
down, and is not as robust as gas. The $6,000 investment seems reasonable and gas would only
be used in an emergency.
Mr. Pato questioned why all three sections of the building would not be of concern if VRF
systems have problems under these conditions. Also, frigid temperatures often cause school
cancellations and temperatures do not commonly plummet midday. 'The DiNisco team clarified
that the gas element would serve all wings. Mr. Cronin said, from a Facilities stand point, the
proposal is about asset protection more than about students. At the high school, a couple of the
building sections froze because the VRF system failed due to cold temperatures and wind.
Mr. Lucente said his experience is that VRF systems do struggle on occasion but the instances
are infrequent. He does not see the value adding gas at LLP because the building is not planned
to be used as an emergency shelter.
Ms. Hai agreed that LCP's scheduling makes it less likely that children will be present for great
lengths of time during emergency circumstances. The generator that keeps the building at"asset
protection" level seems sufficient.
Mark Sandeen, Sustainable Lexington, said that the heat pump system will function down to .-18
degrees. There have been two days in the last 60 years when Lexington has reached this
temperature. 'Two instances when temperature reached .-13 degrees occurred at 2 a.m. and 5 a.m.,
when the building would not be occupied. The average coldest temperature of the year is about 5
degrees. This temperature is within system function range.
Jon Himmel, Permanent Building Committee, asked how much would be spent on a service call
for the building if systems were to freeze. Mr. Cronin said it would easily surpass $6,000. Mr.
Himmel said, although it would mean introducing fossil fuels to the site, $6,000 is a relatively
inexpensive insurance policy.
Ms. Hai said she prefers not to extend the'T'own's reliance on fossil fuels but she believes Mr.
Himmel raises a valid point. Mr. Pato said he strongly believes theTown needs to abandon fossil
fuels but having gas in the short term might be advisable. He is not prepared, however, to make
this decision tonight. Ms. DiNisco said the project bid is on the street now but it is possible to
add the element at a later date for a separate expenditure. Mr. Pato said he is very concerned that
this is the first time he's heard about the gas concept and he is further troubled that the Selectmen
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 19 of 20
did not know, until tonight, about the Hastings School's gas boiler emergency back-up. The
Board and the School Committee have voted repeatedly for all-electric buildings. Mr. Lucente
and Ms. Barry concurred with Mr. Pato's concerns. Ms. Barry said she is further troubled that the
issue came before the Selectmen before reaching the School Committee and it is complicated by
the fact that the School Committee is not expected to meet until August.
The DiNisco team said the project out to bid includes the gas element but that can be removed at
a later date. Ms. Barry expressed surprise and concern that this is the case. She said the Board
would defer a decision on this proposal until after the School Committee and the new
Superintendent have had a chance to discuss the issue.
A two-minute recess was called. The meeting reconvened at 11 :35 p.m.
Discuss Pgjet�t�a� S�ec�a� 'T"own eet�ng_)Karrant Articles
Ms. Barry said that there are currently 18 items anticipated for fall Special Town Meeting,
although several re-zoning applications have not yet filed and several articles may be deferred to
Annual Town Meeting. If all four re-zoning articles move forward, they alone could take a
minimum of 2 nights.
The Board preliminarily discussed deferments, such as Appropriate for Automatic Meter
Reading Equipment and Firing Range Schematic Design Funding. Other possible deferments
included Appropriate for Municipal Facilities Master Plan, Lease Land from the Historical
Society, and Appropriate for Westview Cemetery Building. Ms. Hai said she would prefer to
keep the Firing Range appropriation in sync with the Police Station project. Ms. Barry asked Ms.
Axtell to reorder the list: "definite", "probable" "possible deferral." Mr. Pato said if the rezoning
articles don't materialize, he would prefer to take on some of the deferrals so that Annual Town
Meeting is not overloaded.
Selectmen.—Committee App. .ointments/Rea.nointments/Resi �,qations
-----------p
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to appoint Rita Pandey
to theTown Celebrations Sub.-Committee for a one.-year term expiring May 30, 2019.
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to appoint Dan K.oret7
to the Noise Advisory Committee for a three.-year term to expire September 30, 2020
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 4-0 re-appoint Michelle
Ciccolo to MAGIC for a one.-year term expiring on June 30, 2019.
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 to accept the
resignation of:John Frey from theTree Committee. The Board extended its thanks to Mr. Frey
for his service to theTown.
The Board is being asked to fill two open Associate Member positions on the Historic Districts
Commission: the unexpired associate member term of Donna Hooper ending December 31, 2019
and the unexpired associate member term of Paul 0' Shaunessy ending December 31. 201&
Selectmen—July 9, 2018
Page 20 of 20
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selectmen voted 50 to appoint Susan
Bennett to fill the unexpired term ending December 31, 2019 and Mark Connor to fill the
unexpired term ending December 31, 2018 as Associate Members of the Historic Districts
Commission.
Executive Sessions: Exg�.tion�61nt�erest in�Reql_l_-,stqtg
Upon motion duly made and by roll call, the Board of Selectmen voted 50 to enter Executive
Session at 11 :51 p.m. under Exemption 6: Interest in Real Estate. It was declared that an open
meeting discussion may have a detrimental effect on the bargaining position of the 'Town. A
second Executive Session followed, as noted below.
Association, Su�.erior�Qffic�ers
RWIding Maintenance and Public Works Unions
Ms. Barry was recused from the discussion of Exemption 6 because her husband is employed by
the 'Town.
Upon motion duly made and by roll call, the Board of Selectmen voted 40 to enter Executive
Session under Exemption 3: Collective Bargaining Updates-----Lexington Lexington Police Association
Superior Officers, Building Maintenance and Public Works unions and to reconvene in Open
Session only to adjourn. It was declared that an open meeting discussion may have a detrimental
effect on the bargaining position of the 'Town.
Ad'ourn
L_
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Selection voted 40 to adjourn at 12:30 p.m.
A to record; Attest:
Kim Siebert
Recording Secretary