HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-04-22
' ~ •
HISTORIC DISTRICTS CObiM2SSI0N
April 22, 1976
A meeting of the Historic Districts Commission was held on Thursday,
April 22, 1976, in the Selectmen's Meeting Room. Present were Commissioners
Wilbur M. Jaquith, Chairman; Georgia H. Williams, Secretary; S. Lawrence
Whipple; and Associate Commissioners Oliver F. Hopper who was appointed to
serve for Commissioner Thomas J. Holzbog, and Amalia G. Samoylenko, who was
appointed to fill the vacancy.
A hearing was held at 8:35 P.M. on the application of the Town of
Lexington for a Certificate with respect to the erection of a new flagpole
on the Battle Green, which is within the Battle Green District. Present
were Emanuele Coscia, Acting Director of Public Works, and Peter Chalpin,
Senior Engineer, representing the Town; Richard Michelson, President, and
Tony Mancini,. Clerk of the Bicentennial Corporation; Elizabeth Reinhardt,
Chairman, and Anne Grady of the Historical Commission; Roland Greeley,
President of the Lexington Historical Society; biarjorie Weerts of 1906
Massachusetts Avenue; and Martin Gilman. Also included in the application
was a request for two commemorative plaques, one on the crosstree and one
at the base of the flagpole.
The Selectmen have signed a contract with B. A. Larson Co. of Bedford
for a new flagpole which will be an exact replica of the existing except
not of wood and the bottom will not be tapered but cylindrical. The first
section will be 22" in diameter and a steel tube about 14' in the ground.
The flagpole will be 125' in height with 95' total at the base and a 44 1/2'
section on top and will taper from 12 3/4" to 8 5/8" at the top. If can
remove the existing pole which is encased in concrete, the new flagpole will
be installed in the same location as the existing; if cannot remove, the new
one will be located 15' behind- the existing pole. It is planned to remove
the trestle tree and crate it and ship to New York to be duplicated in steel.
It is hoped that the legend on the metal can be reused but will have profes-
sionally redone if necessary. The base of the new flagpole may or may not
be painted green, and the balance of the flagpole will be painted white
amtone polymerice urethane finish. The-trestletree light will be-eliminated
and lights will be put on poles on the Avenue and on Bedford Street as the
effect is supposed to be superior. The halyard will be nylon rope with
steel cable and vinyl coated.
Bowlander in California who made the existing pole was contacted about
making a replacement flagpole, and the two men who made the existing pole
refused to make a new pole this size. Reynolds and Alcoa would not quote on
the project, and no company is interested in making a pole of this size.
Discussion followed on fiberglas flagpoles, but there is some question asto
whether one this height would be satisfactory.
For purposes of record Mr. Jaquith stated:
1. totally inappropriate
2. is appropriate
3. inappropriate but can be approved under hardship clause.
Discussion followed on color and what could be done if the Commission
decided steel not appropriate as wood used in 1700s, 1800s, and early 1900.
A1r. Greeley noted that a flagpole of that size would have been inappropriate
in 1775.
April 22, 1976 - page 2
Peter Chalpin said that everyone wants the new flagpole erected by
July 4th and cannot meet that date unless have approval for the steel pole
which has been selected. Then followed a discussion on location and pos-
sibility of getting the existing pole out of the ground.
The plaques were then discussed. The legend on the trestletree is on
a piece of metal, and it was stated that it was called a plaque. Peter
Chalpin asked if there is any State or National organization that can over-
rule the Historic Districts Commission, and hir. Jaquith said that there was
none. Mr. Michelson suggested that consider change the date to 1775-1944
as would rather see 1975 than 1976. The plaque would be kept with the flag-
pole. The commemorative plaque would have the following legend in capital
letters: "This flagpole dedicated as the permanent memorial of the 200th
anniversary of the battle of Lexington first battle of the American Revolu-
tion April 19, 1975. The Lexington Bicentennial Corporation July 4, 1976."
hlr. Greeley said that he hoped the plaques would relate to the flagpole.
Mr. Whipple said that he was concerned about the plaque wording "First
Battle of the American Revolution" and felt the line arrangement poor.
Mrs. Weerts said that she, Mrs. Nye of 1932 Massachusetts Avenue, and
Mr. Tremblay of 1949 Massachusetts Avenue all were unhappy with a metal pole.
The hearing was adjourned at 10:45 P.M.
Mr. Jaquith stated that metal is inappropriate but could approve under
hardship. Nir. Hooper said that he felt is inappropriate but size requires
metal, and DIr. Whipple agreed.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 P.bi.
Georgia H. Williams
Secretary