HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-03-17PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES OF MARCH 17, 1986
The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in Room G-15, Town Office
Building, was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by the Chairman, Mrs. Uhrig, with
members Cripps, Klauminzer, Sorensen, Planning Director Bowyer, Assistant Planner
Rawski and Secretary Peters present. Mrs. Wood was absent.
70. Board of Appeals: The Board met with Board of Appeals members Riffin,
Scigliano, and Taylor; also associate members Clarke, Miley and Whitman, to hear
their comments on the Planning Board's zoning articles for Town Meeting.
Article 40: Mr. Taylor felt the revisions proposed in 3.6.1 were substanta-
tive rather than technical changes to the Zoning By -Law, adding that the Planning
Board had tried to revise this at Town Meeting twice previously and failed. Mrs.
Uhrig replied that the Planning Board felt that the Board of Appeals' authority
to grant use variances had been changed by adoption of the new state Zoning Act
in 1975, and the authority to grant use variance afterward had to be specifically
reenacted by the individual cities and towns.
Mrs. Riffin agreed with Mr. Taylor and felt there should be an explanation of the
phrase that was deleted.
Mrs. Uhrig asked that the Planning Board be informed as soon as possible if the
' Board of Appeals adopted a position on Article 40.
Later in the meeting, the Planning Board agreed to propose the separation of
Article 40 into two parts when it is moved at Town Meeting, separating section
A3) of the draft dated 3-05-86, from the rest of Article 40.
Article 41: Mrs. Riffin felt there were discrepancies between the two
tables on page 4 of the draft dated 3-07-86, and thought they should both read
the same. Mr. Bowyer will look into this.
On page 5: A8), Mrs. Riffin recommended specifying here whether the Board of
Appeals, Board of Selectmen or the Planning Board is the SPGA for a particular
district rather than referencing to other parts of the By -Law. For developments
in an RD district the SPGA is the Board of Appeals and for the conversion of a
municipal building the SPGA is the Board of Selectmen.
Article 43: Mr. Taylor noted that the Board of Appeals understands that if
the degree of non -conformity is greater than 50%, a variance must be obtained.
That is the correct interpretation.
There were no comments from the members and associate members of the Board of
Appeals on Articles 42, 44, 45 and 46. Mrs. Uhrig thanked them for giving both
their opinions and time for discussion of the zoning articles.
************************ ARTICLES FOR THE 1986 TOWN MEETING *******************
71. Article 44: In section 5.4.2 a.6. sixth line of the draft dated 3-11-86,
the Board agreed to delete the words "reasonable time period" and substitute the
words "90 days".
Minutes for March 17, 1986
Page 2
72. Article 45: Mr. Sorensen commented that this article might encourage devel-
opers to propose a certain type of building, i.e. with parking underneath and two
stories with a flat roof.
Mr. Bowyer explained the revised language stating the dormer had to be struc-
turally supported on the rafters rather than on the bearing walls was intended to
prevent the construction of a full shed dormer as a half -story, which would
negate the 2 story limit on commercial buildings.
Mrs. Uhrig suggested preparing examples of current construction in town, such as
Custance Place, for presentation at Town Meeting to explain how the new height
regulations would operate.
73. Article 46: Mr. Cripps questioned whether the words non-reflecting surface
could be better defined.
74. Article 47, Northland: The Board discussed the revised landscaping plans and
letter dated March 13, 1986 from Northland with representatives from the North-
land Investment Corp., owners of the Middlesex Mall. They reviewed the plans
showing the additional landscaping requested by the Board, and the letter stating
Northland's agreement to make a financial commitment to the town of $50,000 to be
used for traffic improvements at the North Street -Lowell Street intersection.
' Mrs. Uhrig said that concern had been expressed on the TMMA bus trip about the
steepness of the slope abutting Lowell Street. The landscape architect repre-
senting Northland said that rip -rap could be used to create a steeper slope at
the bottom and a larger flat area abutting Lowell Street at the top, but he did
not recommend it. Mr. Sorensen and Mr. Cripps felt the 2:1 slope originally
proposed would be aesthetically more pleasing and easier to maintain. There was
agreement the Board preferred the grading originally proposed by Northland.
The Board will take final action on the Article 48 draft report at their next
meeting, March 24th.
75. Article 49, Northgate: Mr. Bowyer reported that more editing was needed
before final action could be taken on the draft report. The Board will plan to
take final action at their next meeting on March 24th.
76. Article 47, Choate Symmes: Ms. Rawski presented her site analysis of the
plan for the Board's review. She described the site as consisting of three
wooded knolls with a low area through the center of the site. She noted 100 more
parking spaces were required to meet the requirements of the By -Law. She felt
there had been good integration of the buildings to the site.
Jacqueline Davison, a member of the South Lexington Civic Association, said they
did not object to the use, but did object to the intensity of development. They
recommended the number of units proposed be reduced, as a condition for approval.
Mr. Cripps expressed concern about the shortage of required parking spaces and
the forty foot height of some of the buildings. He noted that parking require-
ments of the By -Law could be met by eliminating units, which would also decrease
the bulk of the buildings.
Minutes for March 17, 1986 Page 3
Mr. Sorensen commented the main building was 900 feet long, probably the biggest
building in town. He felt the the development was too intense, and questioned
whether the Board would have considered approval of the proposal, given the
massiveness of the buildings and the shortage of required parking spaces if it
had been an apartment complex. There was general agreement by the Board that
these problems needed further attention.
77. Non—zoning Articles: The Board recommended the engineering, planning and
conservation staffs prepare written comments in favor of the approval of Article
26, Townwide Topography; and decided it would not be necessary for the Board to
comment on Article 22, Street Acceptance and Construction.
******************** ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ************
SUBDIVISION OF LAND
----- ------
78. Grassland Street, Robert Pelan: Gary Larson described his analysis of the
site. They are proposing a six lot cluster subdivision on an approximately six
acre site. They have met with the Conservation Commission, and propose to re—
place wetlands they disturb, if the Conservation Commission approves the sub—
stitution. They will be requesting the construction of sidewalks be waived, and
noted the drive is a little over 500 feet long.
Mrs. Uhrig said their proposed access over the wetlands must be acceptable to the
' Conservation Commission or the plan is not viable. Ms. Rawski noted she did not
see any major problems with the cluster plan, which proposes a hammerhead turn—
around and a south facing road.
The Board had no objections to their proceeding with the application. Mr. Larson
reported they will do an on—site survey; establish a limit of work line, and mark
trees of size within the limit of work line.
Mrs. Uhrig noted the Board is not inclined to waive a sidewalk on one side; and
added perhaps the wide road right of way could also contain a sidewalk.
79. Other subdivision items: The Board reviewed informally the latest revision
for the Mason's Hollow cluster plan proposed by Mark Moore. Mr. Bowyer reported
it is incomplete, and an extension of time for action by the Board should be
requested by the applicant. He added the Board needs to decide if the proof plan
entitles him to six or seven dwelling units.
********************************* REPORTS **************************************
80. Planning Board, Subcommittees:
a. Selectmen's Breakfast: Mrs. Uhrig attended, and reported it is hoped to
finis Town Meeting by April 30. It was also agreed that the citizens
rezoning articles should be the first item of business at a Town Meeting
session. Mr. Sorensen proposed that "dates certain" be: April 16 for
Articles 48 and 49, and April 28 for Article 47.
Minutes for March 17, 1986
Page 4
b. Board of Appeals: Mr. Sorensen reported the Board of Appeals gave
approval to the three applications they heard on March 13, 1986, including
granting a special permit to Kayn Realty Trust at 27 Muzzey Street, which
the Planning Board had recommended against granting without the conditions
recommended by the Planning Board.
c. Center Revitalization Committee: Mr. Cripps will present part of the CRC
report on the center to the Town Meeting.
81. Planning Director:
a. Sunset Ridge Subdivision: Mr. Bowyer reminded the Board of the hearing
next week, March 24, 1986, on the definitive plan.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:47 p.m.
[1
Stephen Cripps
Vice Chairman