HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-09-231
D
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 23, 1985
The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in Room G-15, was called to
order at 7:40 p.m. by the Chairman, Mrs. Smith, with members Flemings, Sorensen,
Uhrig, Planning Director Bowyer, Assistant Planner Rawski and Secretary Peters
present. Mr. Cripps was absent.
199. Approval of Minutes
On the motion of Mrs. Flemings, seconded by Mr. Sorensen, it was voted unanimous-
ly to accept, as written, the minutes of September 9, 1985.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING, POLICIES
200. Housing Policy Re: BIDC, Katandin Woods: The Board reviewed the "Poll On
BIDC Katandin Woods Comprehensive Permit Proposal", as a way to identify what
would make the BIDC proposal acceptable to the Planning Board. Housing Needs
Advisory Committee members Eleanor Klauminzer, Joel Adler, William Hays, William
Spencer, Eric Clarke and Gail Colwell were present.
The Board was in unanimous agreement that the proposal should be presented as an
RD district to the Town Meeting. Mrs. Smith noted that the Selectmen were voting
tonight on calling a Special Town Meeting this fall.
The Board also agreed that the BIDC proposal must comply with the provisions of
the Inclusionary Housing Policy. If the developer is permitted by the funding
agency to have only 20%, instead of 25%, of the total number of units for sub-
sidized housing, the Town should have the means to verify the income levels of
those occupants.
Mr. Spencer reported that the Housing Needs Advisory Committee had agreed, at
their September 19, 1985 meeting, that the most appropriate use of the Cosgrove
land was for multi -family housing. Mrs. Klauminzer urged the inclusion of more
family oriented housing, with ground floor entrances, more three bedroom units
and recreation areas geared for children.
Mrs. Smith felt that any development was inappropriate until the traffic problems
had been addressed and solutions implemented; the intersections in the area are
now totally saturated. She noted that the addition of 140 units of housing would
certainly have a negative impact. Mrs. Klauminzer noted the traffic would be
less from a residential development than from a commercial development. Mr.
Clarke said that workers living close to their jobs was desirable.
Traffic aside, Mr. Sorensen thought that offices were the most appropriate use
in that area. Mrs. Smith noted that as a "corner" lot between commercial and
residential areas it could be oriented either way -- to Hartwell Ave.
(commercial) or Wood St. (residential). Mrs. Flemings thought there were already
too many office buildings in the area and preferred the site be used for multi-
family housing. She felt there was a greater need for the housing, and it was
difficult to locate elsewhere in town. Mrs. Smith urged as much negotion as
possible before the application is filed with the Board of Appeals.
Minutes, September 23, 1985
page 2
ARTICLES FOR 1986 TOWN MEETING
201. Choate-Symmes Retirement Community, Ricci property, Waltham Street:
Choate-Symmes Life Care, Inc. represented by Fred C. Bailey, Tom Huebner, and
architects Biff Longfield and Benjamin Burdsall presented their proposal to
construct a life care retirement center on a 29.437 acre site on the east side of
Waltham Street adjoining the Waltham city line. They will request rezoning to
an RD district.
Mr. Bailey said that the center would provide for the residential, personal and
health care needs of the "over -65" at a single location, consisting of three
functional elements, constructed in the architectural style of New England, and
Lexington in particular. These elements are residential living units, health care
facitities and community spaces. Mr. Bailey noted that their research had shown
a shortage of this type of facility and a need for this type of care.
Mr. Longfield presented the site plan and described the site factors influencing
the design of the facility such as excessive slopes, tree cover, ponds and wet-
lands. They have one access to Waltham Street and hope to have a second from the
Waltham side of the development. Mr. Huebner said there were about five acres of
wetland, and they would work closely with the Conservation Commission during
their design process. BSC will do their traffic study. Mrs. Smith asked if they
would be able to increase the Waltham Street access width to at least 50 feet.
' Mr. Huebner felt that they would be able to do this.
There will be 250 living units, consisting of studio, one, two and a few three
bedroom units. The health care component will consist of a 60 -bed nursing home.
Mrs. Klauminzer asked for a break -down of the bedroom mix. Mr. Huebner did not
have exact numbers. He thought there was a small number of studios, more one and
two bedrooms, and a few three bedroom units.
In answer to questions about the cost of living there, Mr. Huebner said there
would be an endowment fee of between $100,000 and $200,000 refundable upon leav-
ing or to the estate. Units would cost about $700 to $1400 per month, including
nursing fees and meals. Mrs. Flemings addressed the issue of affordability. Mr.
Huebner felt that the nursing service made the life care retirement community
more costly than traditional housing such as condominiums and apartments, but
that they would consider any suggestions. Mrs. Smith suggested they meet with
the Housing Needs Advisory Committee.
Mrs. Smith noted that the Town hopes to provide as many different housing options
as possible to its inhabitants; and was pleased to recognize all the Lexington
people involved in the proposal. She felt that the proposal was well thought
out.
202. Middlesex Mall property, off Lowell Street, letter from Northland: The
Board discussed a letter from Northland proposing a rezoning. When they have
plans to present for review, the Board will be glad to discuss the proposal with
them.
Minutes, September 23, 1985
page 3
-------------- ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
COMPREHENSIVE PERMIT
203. Katandin Woods, Wood Street: Appointment with BIDC: Arthur Ullian, William
Kasper and Charles Tseckares, architect, for BIDC presented their plans for the
construction of multi -family housing on the corner of Wood Street and Hartwell
Avenue under the Comprehensive Permit process. They will be financing this
through MFHA but the federal program, called the Ullman Bill allows a tax
exemption if 20% of the units are for low-income. Mrs. Flemings asked if they
have plans to use state 707 money in the proposal. Mr. Ullian replied they did
not plan to, but they could.
Mrs. Smith said that the Town needs family rental housing and that is what they
are looking for in this development. She hoped that the Town could work in
partnership with the developer. The Board wants the housing to remain in the
rental stock of the town as long as possible. Per the Teller Program, the lock -
in period for units remaining rental is 14-15 years. Then the units must first
be offered for sale to the tenants; then, to the local Housing Authority at a 10%
discount.
Mrs. Klauminzer felt that the number of units appropriate for families was too
low. The present plans show approximately 60% 2 bedroom and 40% one bedroom with
three 3 bedroom units. The Housing Needs Advisory Committee would like to see
' more units for families. She suggested decreasing the number of one bedroom
units and increasing the number of three bedroom units. Mr. Ullian requested
some concrete numbers of what the Town wants in a bedroom mix.
Mr. Tseckares presented the plans for site development and buildings. He said
that the fact that the site is in a transition area from commercial to residen-
tial development produced the concept of using larger residential structures to
reflect the commercial development nearby.
Joyce Miller, chairman of the Conservation Commission, asked how many units were
now being planned. The answer was 138 units which will allow for a 50 foot
buffer around all the wetlands.
Mr. Ullian reported that the BSC will do the traffic study. He felt that the
increase in traffic will be less with residential development than if the site
had been developed commercially, and that the "reverse" commute generated by the
residential development will have less impact on the already heavy.traffic in the
area.
Mrs. Flemings questioned the design of such large buildings for the steep slopes
that exist on the site. Mr. Ullian answered that in order to protect the wet-
lands as required by law, and still get the density they need to be financially
feasible, they must build on the slopes and cut the treed area since that is all
that is left. Mrs. Klauminzer wondered if smaller buildings and more of them
might cause less havoc to the site.
Mrs. Smith agreed that the design concept of using the land as a transition
between commercial and residential use was good, but that the bulk of the build-
ings was too great, and that too much of the land and trees had to be disturbed
to accomplish this. She hoped they could do better, although she realized that
Minutes, September 23, 1985
page 4
the Town had little control under the 774 Program, and that the developer had to
have a financially feasible plan. The architect suggested a visit to some work
done elsewhere might show that the mass of the buildings is not as overwhelming
as Board members seem to feel they are.
Mr. Sorensen thought the best use of the property was for commercial develop-
ment, given the location of commercial property so close to the site.
Mr. Ullian commented that this had been proposed by Spaulding 3 Slye and "shot
down" at a previous Town Meeting. Mrs. Smith replied that the Town Meeting
might approve a multi -family proposal, and that they should not give up on the
Town Meeting process.
SPECIAL PERMIT, CONVERSION OF MUNICIPAL BUILDING
204. Franklin School, Report to the Board of Selectmen: The Board reviewed the
draft report prepared by the Mr. Bowyer, who noted that parking, grading and
utility details are still needed from the developer before the report can be
completed. He has contacted GBCD for the material. The Selectmen's hearing is
scheduled for October 7, 1985. Mrs. Smith suggested that the Board finalize the
report at their September 30th meeting.
SUBDIVISION OF LAND
205. Hampton, Revision to Site Plan re: retaining walls: Joel Roos presented a
"field change - after -the -fact" revision of the site plan showing a retaining
wall that had not been shown on the definitive plan the Board approved. Mrs.
Smith said that it was a more signifigant change than a field change, and the
question is process not aesthetics. On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded by
Mrs. Uhrig, it was voted unanimously to amend the definitive plan to show the
walls as they are constructed, providing the construction is approved by the
Engineering Department.
206. 188 Lowell Street, Preliminary Plan, Request for Extension of Time:
McNeil Associates have requested an extension until October 15, 1985 for Planning
Board action on the Preliminary Subdivision application at 188 Lowell Street. On
the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded by Mrs. Uhrig, it was voted unanimously to
grant the extension of time.
207. Toga property, Turning Mill Road, Preliminary Plan, staff review:
Ms. Rawski briefly reviewed a preliminary plan for a three lot subdivision off
Turning Mill Road. The third lot may have wetland problems.
208. APPLICATIONS TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS
Mrs. Flemings presented an oral review of the cases to be heard by the Board of
Appeals on October 10, 1985. On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded by Mrs.
Uhrig, it was voted unanimously to make no comment on the following three cases:
94 Hartwell Avenue, The Restaurant Realty Trust; Special Permit, sign.
30 Hancock Street, 30 Hancock St. Trust, Mary M. Jones, Trustee; raise
roof.
3 Pleasant Lane, Haig Sarian, Special Permit, swimming pool.
52 Waltham Street, by Dennis R. Lowe & Barry P. DeVenna; Special Permit, free
standing sign: On the motion of Mrs. Uhrig, seconded by Mrs. Flemings, it was
Minutes, September 23, 1985 page 5
voted 3-0-1 (Mr. Sorensen abstained) to recommend against approval of the appli-
cation for a special permit. The Board felt it did not meet any of the criteria
for a free-standing sign, as set forth in the Zoning By -Laws.
REPORTS
209 Planning Director
a. Zoning Map: Mr. Bowyer distributed a draft of "Unaccepted Streets to
Appear on the Zoning Map", and asked the Board's help in verifying the list.
The companion, "Non Streets That Do NOT Appear on the Zoning Map" will be
sent out for next week's meeting. Both lists are documentation to update
and revise the Zoning Map. Mrs. Smith asked that they be mailed to Frank
Sandy for review also.
b. Route 3 Landlocked Land, Burlington: The developer is proposing to
construct 2,000,000 sq. ft. of office space, a small hotel (500,000 sq.
ft.) on a dead-end street. They are proposing to build a new interchange
off Rte 3 and service roads to reach this land. Burlington is holding a
Special Town Meeting this week to consider the purchase of this land by the
Town for conservation. Mr. Bowyer feels there is not a project without
State transportation support, and that was not evident.
c. Article 15: The Board has been notified by the Attorney General's office
' of the disapproval of Article 15 passed at the 1985 Annual Town Meeting.
Palmer & Dodge is interested in the Board's response. It was agreed the
Town should not appeal the disapproval to the courts.
d. Ridge Estates III: A corrected plan has been filed. Procedurely, it
will be treated as a new submission; substantively, it is subject to the
1984 Zoning By -Law.
e. Willow Ridge subdivision: (see Public Participation section of the
minutes of September 9, 1985). A sketch plan has been filed.
The meeting adjourned at 11:06 p.m.
1
P
Clerk