HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-06-17PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
MEETING OF JUNE 179 1985
The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in Room G-15, Town Offices was
called to order at 7:36 p.m. by the Chairman, Mrs. Smith, with members Cripps,
Flemings, Sorensen, Uhrig and Planning Director Bowyer present.
PLANS NOT REQUIRING SUBDIVISION APPROVAL
150. South Rindge Avenue, Moore Homes Inc., Form A-85/8: The Board reviewed a
plan showing an adjustment in the side lot line between lots 12A and 13A and
between lots 17A and 18A; the lots are in the Farmington Rise subdivision. On
the motion of Mr. Sorensen seconded by Mr. Cripps, it was voted unanimously:
to endorse the plan entitled "Plan of Land in Lexington Mass." dated April
24, 1985 by BSC, Bedford, Mass. certified by Roger M. Corbin, professional
land surveyor, with application form A-85/8 by Roger M. Corbin, as it does
not require approval under the Subdivision Control Law.
151. 71 Hancock Street, Stephen Nannis, Form A-85/10: The Board reviewed a plan
showing the transfer of 1,299 sq. ft. of land from the Dunnicliff lot, with
frontage on Adams Street, to the Nannis lot, with frontage on Hancock Street.
There is no change in the frontage of either lot both of which have more than the
the minimum lot area. On the motion of Mr. Sorensen seconded by Mrs. Uhrig, it
was voted unanimously:
to endorse the plan entitled "Compiled Subdivision Plan of Land in
Lexington, Mass." dated January 31, 1985 by Miller and Nylander Company,
certified by Donald J. Forand, registered land surveyor, with application A-
85/10 by Stephen Nannis and C. J. Dunnicliff, as it does not require
approval under the Subdivision Control Law.
152. APPLICATIONS TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS
Mr. Sorensen presented an oral review of cases to be heard by the Board of
Appeals on July 11, 1985. On the motion of Mr. Sorensen seconded by Mrs.
Flemings, it was voted unanimously to make no recommendation on all the following
cases:
5 Fletcher Ave., Ellen Alaimo; variance, yard setback
22 Muzzey St., Daniel Yuill; variance, side yard setback
238 Wood St., MIT Lincoln Lab; SP, additional building
111 Adams St., Carole Esserian; SP, swimming pool
26 Blossomcrest Rd., Lawrence Elliott; SP, swimming pool
SUBDIVISION OF LAND
153. Farmington Rise, Moore Homes Inc.; Acceptance of Surety: The Board was in
receipt of a memorandum dated June 1985, from Town Engineer Francis Fields
estimating that $40,000 would be necessary to complete the Farmington Rise sub-
division. On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded by Mr. Cripps, it was voted
unanimously:
Minutes, June 17, 1985
page 2
to set the amount of surety for the Farmington Rise subdivision at $40,000
and to accept Lexington Savings bank book no. 790033815 in the sum of
$40,000, accompanied by an assignment of that bank book executed by Mark
Moore, Jr., as surety for the construction of public facilities in the
Farmington Rise subdivision.
RECESS:
At 7:55 p.m. the Board recessed to meet with the Board of Selectmen to receive
land use maps prepared by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council. At 8:16 p.m.
the Board reconvened.
154. Toga Property, Turning Mill Road; Preliminary Subdivision Plan: The Board
reviewed two schemes for the subdivision of land off Turning Mill Road owned by
Carl and Elayne Toga. In both scheme A and scheme B there is an offset in the
proposed extension of Turning Mill Road to avoid a lot owned by Landau which
projects into the extension of the Turning Mill Road right-of-way. The result is
an awkward geometric configuration that does not comply with the Town's standards
or good engineering practice. The Board found unacceptable the proposal in
scheme A that the driveway for lot 2 pass through lot 3. On the motion of Mr.
Cripps seconded by Mr. Sorensen, it was voted unanimously to disapprove both
schemes A and B principally because of the proposed geometric configuration of
the extension of Turning Mill Road.
155. Graystone off Pleasant Street, Boyd -Smith; Design Alternatives: The Board
continued its discussion of design alternatives with William Smith, Joel Roos
and landscape architect Rick Lamb. It was agreed that the sanitary sewer and
storm drainage would be constructed as shown on the plans originally submitted by
Boyd -Smith.
A sidewalk will be constructed next to Pleasant Street between the subdivision
street and Goldman property. The 30 inch oak tree would be preserved by weaving
the sidewalk around it. Mr. Lamb pointed out the 30 inch oak tree might not
survive as long as younger trees which might be lost by "weaving" of the side-
walk; he would sacrifice the 30 inch tree in the interest of saving younger
growing trees. It was agreed that a sidewalk plan would be shown on the defini-
tive subdivision plan; if more detailed site examination shows an alternative
alignment of the sidewalk would conform to the natural features of the land
better, the Planning Board would consider the alternative as a field change.
In discussing the profile of the road, it was agreed that slopes or retaining
walls could be located within the right-of-way of the road provided there was a
flat area of at least five feet adjacent to the paved street. In an informal
Poll of the Board, Mr. Sorensen, Mr. Cripps and Mrs. Flemings said a 20 foot wide
paved section would be acceptable in the turnaround only. The remainder of the
subdivision street will be 24 feet wide.
Mr. Lamb showed a plan with the limit of work delineated. Mr. Smith noted that
in order to construct the drain/underdrain system the rear of lots 1,9,10 and 11,
it would be necessary to have 15-20 foot swath cut through the area. He was
willing to do that but wanted everyone, including abuttors, to understand that a
lot of trees would be lost in the installation of the drain. Mr. Bowyer suggest-
ed that the immediate abuttors be consulted to be made aware of the consequences
of the elaborate drain system they had requested. Mrs. Smith will discuss the
Minutes, June 17, 1985
page 3
issue with the Conservation Commission at its meeting the next evening.
It was agreed that changes agreed to would be made to the mylars of the defini-
tive subdivision plan. The staff will prepare a draft of a Certificate of Action
approving the subdivision which will be presented to the Board for action at its
meeting on July 1, 1985.
156. 188 Lowell Street, McNeill property: William Roop and William McDevitt of
McNeill Associates were present to discuss a proposed subdivision of the land at
188 Lowell Street which was the subject of a rezoning petition (indefinitely
postponed) at the 1985 Town Meeting. Using an assessors property map, Roop
explained some of the alternatives under consideration, such as: 1) a land swap
with the East Village Nursing Home, 2) construction of new subdivision streets to
connect to Page Road or Sanderson Road, as well as Lowell Street, and 3) poten-
tial participation in development, probably in stages, by John and Mary Castelli
who own a 7.695 acre lot and a 1.15 acre lot adjoining the 11.5 acre lot owned by
McNeill. Mr. Roop said that Castelli is not interested in selling but may
participate in a joint venture.
Board members responded by saying that a good access to Lowell Street, with good
sight lines, was one concern with the overriding concern being the preservation
of the natural characteristics of the land. It was agreed that McNeill would
pursue the various alternatives further and afterward, based on a review of the
topographic and site features, would meet again with the Board.
PLANNING BOARD ORGANIZATION
157. Election of Officers. As provided in Section 2.1 of the Planning Board's
"Proceedural Rules", the Board conducted its annual election of officers. For
the office of Chairman, Mrs. Uhrig nominated Jacquelyn Smith; for the office of
Vice Chairman, Mr. Cripps nominated Mrs. Uhrig; for the office of Clerk, Mrs.
Uhrig nominated Mr. Cripps; no other nominations for any of the positions were
made. On the motion of Mrs. Uhrig seconded by Mrs. Flemings, it was voted
unanimously to elect Mrs. Smith as Chairman, Mrs. Uhrig as Vice -Chairman and Mr.
Cripps as Clerk.
REPORTS
158. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS, SUBCOMMITEES
a. Board of Appeals Hearing, June 13, 1985: The Board discussed the action
of the Board of Appeals in granting by a 5-0 vote, a variance from parking
requirements at 231 Bedford Street. Members commented that this would be a
bad decision because: it could be used as a precedent to request other
commercial parking in a residential zoning district; it violated the
requirements for the submission of an off-street parking plan; the
Conservation Commission had opposed the parking proposal because of its
proximity to the North Lexington Brook; and the decision was a use variance
which might have other repercussions. It was agreed that Mrs. Smith would
talk with Chairman Taylor of the Board of Appeals prior to the decision
being filed.
1
1
Minutes, June 17, 1985
page 4
b. 403 Waltham Street: Several members inquired about a large 2-3 story
addition under construction over the beauty parlor at 403 Waltham Street.
Members inquired how a building of that size could be built in compliance
with the dimensional requirements and whether there was sufficient off-
street parking. Mr. Bowyer will report at the next meeting.
c. Center Revitalization Committee: Mr. Sorensen reported that due to a
forthcoming change in his employment he will be unable to attend the
meetings of the Center Revitalization Committee which occur in the noon
hour. He intends to resign. Mr. Cripps indicated his willingness to serve
on the CRC as the Planning Board's representative.
d. Minuteman Tech, Conference Center: Mrs. Uhrig reported that she had
talked with Representative Doran's office and that no legislation had been
filed after the Town Meeting to permit a conference center to be built.
They will keep their eyes open for such legislation and will contact Mrs.
Uhrig if anything is filed.
159. Planning Director
a. Lexwood Poultry Property: Mr. Bowyer reported that he had met with land
surveyor Roger Corbin relative to the potential acquisition of the old
Lexwood Poultry property at 170 Wood Street. Two barn structures were
converted in 1946-47 to a two-family and a three-family dwelling. That
conversion was not permitted by the Town but may have some legitimacy under
post World War II emergency federal housing authorizations. In any event
the new planned residential development section in the Zoning By -Law may
permit the property to be legitimized if a subdivision plan is filed and the
three family house is de -converted to a two family house.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:13 p.m.
Step en Cripps, Clerk