HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-05-23PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
MEETING OF MAY 23, 1983
The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in Room G-15, Town Offices, was
called to order at 7:42 p.m. by the Chairman, Mrs. Smith, with members Flemings,
Nichols, Sorensen, Uhrig and Planning Director Bowyer present.
APPLICATIONS TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS
103. 124 Spring Street, Beal Company; SPS: Mr. Bowyer reported on a telephone con-
versation with Gary Larson, Landscape Architect, who reported on their analysis of
using compact car spaces in the garage. If the space width is nine feet, there are
633 spaces; if the space width is 8.5 feet, there would be 668 spaces, an increase
of 35; if the space width is eight feet, there would be 703 spaces, an increase of
an additional 35. Beal will use a space width of 8.5 feet, meaning there are 668
spaces in the garage and 134 open air, at -grade spaces, of which 20 would be at the
front entrance. That means there would be 114 open air, at -grade spaces in the
garage area of which there would still be about 55 in the 100 -foot buffer strip
recommended by the Planning Board. Beal still intends to have 802 parking spaces.
Mrs. Smith indicated a willingness to yield from the 700 parking spaces previously
recommended if the developer showed a cooperative attitude. She suggested that the
Board recommend that there be no parking spaces allowed in the required building
setback area, which is 100 feet from the RO district line, and no paving in the
required parking setback area, which is 50 feet from the RO district line. Mrs.
Flemings suggested that the Board recommend there be no more than 50 open air, at -
grade spaces in the garage area.
Mr. Sorensen observed that the Board seemed to be saying that the total number of
spaces is less of a problem than their location. The total number of spaces affects
traffic; the location of spaces affects abutting residences. He was also concerned
about advocating a maximum number of parking spaces when zoning provisions generally
deal with minimum numbers of spaces. Mrs. Flemings said it is consistent to limit
the number of parking spaces because that might reduce traffic on the streets which
is consistent with the needs of the south Lexington area. Mrs. Smith said the real
question is adequacy rather than a maximum or a minimum. The developer says that
700 is adequate for day-to-day needs except for two annual conferences. It was
agreed to incorporate the suggestions made by Mrs. Smith and Mrs Flemings as the
Board's recommendations.
The Board reviewed a draft of a supplementary report dated May 23, 1983. After dis-
cussion, it was agreed the section on traffic was acceptable. Some other minor
corrections were made.
On the motion of Mrs. Nichols, seconded by Mrs. Uhrig, it was voted unanimously
that, if six conditions outlined in the report are included, the proposal will con-
stitute a suitable development, and to accept the report as amended.
104. 85 Hartwell Avenue, Boston Properties; Variances, parking dimensions: The
Board reviewed a draft report dated May 23 on the petition for variances for a
higher percentage of compact cars and variances from the required aisle width. In
view of the problems with the parking layout, Mr. Sorensen suggested that the
developer should investigate angle parking. He said that in cases where there is
insufficient parking, cars are often parked on grass areas and shoulders adjacent to
driveways. He urged the Board to recommend that six-inch vertical granite curbing
be installed on drives to prevent parking on shoulders.
Planning Board Minutes: May 23, 1983 2
On the motion of Mrs. Nichols, seconded by Mrs. Flemings, it was voted unanimously
to recommend against granting the variances requested because 69% of the parking
spaces in violation is simply too high a percentage. The Board recommends further
that the applicant review the design of the parking area to obtain a more workable
layout and to consider reducing the size of the building to correspond to the number
of workable parking spaces.
85 Hartwell Avenue, Boston Properties; SPS: The Board reviewed a draft of a report
dated May 23, 1983. Several changes were agreed to including moving much of the
traffic data to an appendix. On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded by Mrs. Uhrig,
it was voted unanimously to recommend that the SPS not be approved because the traf-
fic capacity of the streets is not adequate to handle the additional traffic. If
conditions restricting the use of 75% of the parking spaces during the peak hours
are included, the Board would recommend that the special permit be granted. The
Board approved the report as corrected.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING, POLICIES
105. Additional Commercial Development, South Lexington: It was agreed that the
issues paper on Additional Commercial Development in the CR Districts, South Lexing-
ton, dated May 10, 1983, needs to be finalized. Mrs. Smith suggested that it be
placed on the agenda for the next meeting and that members concentrate on 1) the
language to be included in the final draft and 2) the process that should be used to
involve other interested parties in developing a policy on additional commercial
development in south Lexington.
' REPORTS
106. Planning Director
a. Summer Staff Schedule: Mr. Bowyer outlined the following as major pro-
jects on which the staff will be working this summer: 1) South Lexington, 2)
center business district, including land use, zoning and traffic, 3) comple-
tion of the Housing Volume of the Social Characteristics of Lexington series,
and 4) preparation of a new zoning map. The Town Manager's office has agreed
to make one paid intern available for the summer. He hopes to have one or
more volunteer interns as well. A project to be undertaken by an intern
working in the Town Manager's office is the systematic recreation of the
Zoning By -Law since it was first passed in 1924.
b. Citizen's Guide to Zoning: Mr. Bowyer provided each member of the Board
with a copy of the "The Citizen's Guide to Zoning," published by the American
Planning Association, and written specifically for citizen Board members. It
was agreed that members would read a few chapters of the book and discuss them
at Board meetings.
c. Meeting Schedule: Meetings in June will be held on the 6th aannd/ 20th.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:56 p.m Zg,
dithJ. Urk