HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-11-01315
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 1, 1982
The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in Room G-15, Town Offices, was
called to order at 7:39 p.m., by the Chairman, Mrs. Smith, with members Nichols,
Sandy, Sorensen, Uhrig, and Planning Director Bowyer present.
161. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of October 18, 1982, were corrected and on a motion by
Mrs. Nichols, seconded by Mr. Sorensen, were approved unanimously as corrected.
L}
DETERMINATION OF PLANNING BOARD APPROVAL
162. 376 Lincoln Street, Form A-82/9
[[] The Board reviewed a plan showing the division of a lot on Lincoln Street containing
Q
'72 q 992 square are feet into two lots. On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded by
Mr. Sandy, it was voted -unanimously:
The plan entitled "Compiled Subdivision Plan of Land in Lexington, Mass." dated
September 16, 1982, by Miller & Nylander Company of Lexington, Mass., certified
by Donald J. Forand, registered land surveyor, accompanying application Form
A-82/9, executed by Henrietta Atwood, owner, does not require approval under
the Subdivision Control Law.
163. APPLICATIONS TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS '
The Board reviewed a staff analysis dated October 28, 1982, for cases to be heard by
the Board of Appeals on November 18, 1982. On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded
by Mr. Sandy, it was voted unanimously to make no recommendation on the following
cases:
1265 Massachusetts Avenue, Gold Ribbon Farms: SP, farm produce
1265 Massachusetts Avenue, Anthony Cataldo: SP, Christmas trees
60 Winter Street, Joseph Sullivan: Variance, front -yard
922 Waltham Street, N. A. Cannalonga: Variance, yard- SP, use
The Board reviewed the draft of a recommendation on this case. It was ,agreed to pre-
face the Board's recommendation with a note on the technical issue of whether a spe
cial permit could be granted as the use is no longer permitted in this zoning dis-
trict and line 5.4 in Table 1
under which a special permit is requested, does not
allow for a special permit in the CN district. It was agreed the recommendation will
be to organize and clean up the activity on the site. .The Board recommends that the
commercial use be screened from, abutting residential property. The Board agreed
permit should reference a specific plan for the location and the amount of square
feet of exterior space devoted to parking and commercial use so that there will be a.
recorded benchmark in 1982 so that the use cannot be expanded in the future.
On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded by Mrs. Nichols, it was voted unanimously to
recommend that if it is possible to grant a special permit at this time, the special
permit be subject to special conditions as follows:
Minutes of Planning Board Meeting: 11/1/82 2 403
The Planning Board recommends the special permit be issued to Abbot Spray
and Farm Equipment Co. Inc. (without referring to an individual) with well
drafted special conditions designed to improve the appearance of the property
such as:
1. the enclosure of all equipment for sale behind a fence and evergreen'
hedge planting so that the equipment is not visible from any abutting
residential property;
2. planting of evergreen hedge along the property line of Concord Avenue;
10 3. designation of specific areas for customer parking;
4, prohibition of parking and any commercial activity from the part of the
Q lot in the RO (residential) district and delineation of the RO zoning
m line by planting of evergreen hedge;
Q 5. preservation of sight lines for traffic visibility across the corner
of the property at the Concord Avenue -Waltham Street intersection;
6, all evergreen hedge planting to be of material at least four feet high
t s at installation and not more than three feet on center. The material
selected shall create a dense foliage scredn when mature;
7. the permit be restricted to the scope of the present sales and service
of farm equipment and accessories.
The Planning Board further -recommends the special permit cite specifically the amount
of square feet of exterior space devoted to parking and commercial use and refer to a
specific plan for the location of those uses so that there will be a recorded bench-
mark in 1982 so that the use cannot be expanded in the future.
i
f SUBDIVISION OF LAND
E
164. Blossomcrest Subdivision: Execution of Covenant: On the motion of Mr. Sorensen,
seconded by Mrs. Nichols, it was voted unanimously to approve a covenant dated
October 18, 1982. The Board signed the covenant. -
i
OPINION ON CONSTRUCTION OF UNACCEPTED STREETS
I
165. Ward Street, Map 72, Lots 22 and 23, CUS 1982/3
The Board reviewed a staff analysis dated October 29, 1982. Samuel and Mildred
Borella, owners of the property, and others were present to explain that they propose
to build two new houses on what they contended were two separate lots. After dis-
cussion of the platting of the lots and various property transfers that had occurred,
it was agreed the Board would limit its opinion to the construction of the street.
On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded by Mr. Sandy, it was voted unanimously that:
In the opinion of the Planning Board, Ward Street, insofar as it provides
frontage for Lots 22 and 23, as shown on Map 72, is not now of adequate con-
struction. If the improvements identified below are made, and are considered
adequate by the Town Engineer, then the street would be of adequate grade and
construction
Minutes of Planning Board Meeting: 11/1/82 3
401
For the section of ward Street between "Short Street" (a paper street) and
Garfield Street, a distance of about 280 feet, improve the travelled way by:
1) installing and grading additional gravel so that a cross section with
a crown is achieved which is the equivalent of a 12 inch gravel base
(taking into account material already in place),
2J installing and grading the material for a width of 20 feet, with an
additional 18 inches extending beyond the gutter line on each side,
and that section of Ward Street shall be considered to be of adequate grade and
construction for a period of two years only from the date of this opinion.
This,opinion is limited to the construction of the street and should not be
interpreted asimplyingthat the lots under consideration meet other tests of
the Zoning By -Law to qualify them as buildable lots.
Q 166. Robbins Road, Map 31, Lot 32, CUS 1982/4
Q' The Board reviewed a staff analysis dated October 29, 1982. On the motion of Mr.
Sorensen, seconded by Mr. Sandy, it was voted unanimously that:
In the opinion of the Planning Board, Robbins Road, insofar as it provides
frontage for Lot 32, on Assessor's Map 31, is not now of adequate grade and
w construction.. if the improvements identified below are made, and are con-
sidered adequate by the Town Engineer, then the street would be of adequate
grade and construction:
For the section of Robbins Road extending from the northerly side 1-ine of
_ Lot 32 toward Plymouth Street for a distance of at least 125 feet, improve
the travelled way by: -
1) installing and grading additional gravel so that a cross-section with a
a crown is achieved, which is the equivalent of a 12 inch gravel base
(taking, into account material already in place),
2) installing and grading the material for a width of 20 feet, with an
additional 18 inches extending beyond the gutter line on each side,
3) installing and grading the material aligned along the center line of
the right-of-way of Robbins Road,
and for the remaining intervening distance between the 125 foot section
described above and Plymouth Street, the nearest accepted public street, a
distance of about 150 feet, make "maintenance -type" improvements, by:
1) filling of holes and ruts with gravel or other suitable material, rough
grading and other minor improvements to insure that the travelled way
along the intervening distance meets a minimum standard of passability;
and that section of Robbins Road shall be considered to be of adequate grade
and construction for a period of two years only from the date of this opinion.
This opinion is limited to the construction of the street.and should not be
interpreted as implying that the lot under consideration meets other tests of
the Zoning By -Law to.qualify it as a buildable lot.
Minutes of Planning Board Meeting: 11/1/82
EXECUTIVE SESSION
4
399
Chairman Smith polled the Board and it was unanimously voted to go into Executive
Session to consider the purchase and value of real property because discussion in
open session may have a detrimental effect on the Town's negotiating position. Chair-
man Smith stated that upon conclusion of the Executive Session, the Board would re-
sume action on its agenda in open session. At 9:55 p.m. the Board went into Execu-
tive Session.
Following the Executive Session, the Board returned to open session at 10:10 p.m.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING, POLICIES
LO
N 167. Updating of "Guidelines and Policies for Petitions for RD, CD Zoning Amendments"
0 The Board reviewed suggested revisions to the policy prepared by staff, including the
Q addition of an Appendix 2, which sets forth a sample format for a preliminary site
[Y] development and use plan. The Board discussed changing the time allowed at the Plan -
Hing Board's public hearing (Event #6) for presentation by the developer; it was
agreed to leave the existing language which provides for a 15-20 minutes maximum for
presentation. While not changing the language of the policy, it was agreed that the
- Board would adhere more closely to the time schedule set forth particularly for ma-
terial submitted late by developers. Mr. Sorensen suggested that the time for Event
Y1, Preliminary Reading -Concept Plan, be retained as September -October; other members
of the Board favored a change to September -November. On the motion of Mrs. Uhrig,
seconded by Mr. Sandy, it was voted unanimously to revise the policy to include the
' changes suggested by staff. `
168. Policy on Low Income -Housing in Higher Density Developments: Chairman Smith
suggested that the existing policy requiring 20% of the units in a multi -family
development should.at least be suspended, due to the absense of public subsidy funds,
and may need to be reworked entirely with more emphasis on affordable housing. Mr.
Sorensen and Mr. sandy responded that the policy may need to be revised, but they did
not favor suspending the policy until there is an alternative to replace it. It was
agreed that the Planning Board's Advisory Committee on Housing Needs would be re-
quested to research this question and suggest some alternatives. It was agreed that,
in the interim, the staff would indicate to any prospective developers of RD propo-
sals that some affordable housing would be expected. -
169. Proposed Amendments to the Zoning By -Law
Mr. Sandy explained a proposed amendment he had drafted which would allow cluster
development in the RS district and permit a reduction in the area requirement in the
RO district. Mrs. Smith commented that the cluster provision of the Zoning By -Law
does need more flexible provisions and she advocated a complete revision of the
cluster section rather than pieces of it.
Yr. Sandy explained a second amendment he had drafted to allow more two-family dwell-
ings in the town. Two-family dwellings would be permitted if the lot area is at
least twice that required in the district and the street frontage is at least 140% of
that otherwise required. Mr. Sandy commented that there would be no increase in den-
sity since the lot size is equivalent. More rental housing would be produced because
Minutes of Planning Board Meeting: 11/1/82 5
39'7
about half of the units would be rental, though one could build a two-family condo-
minium structure. Several members questioned whether it was advisable to present the
two-family proposal to same Town Meeting that would be considering an accessary
apartment proposal. '
170. HUD -Flood Insurance Districts
Mr. Sandy reported that his review showed that the new HUD flood district map would
not provide any more wetland protection than the Town currently had under the State
Wetland Protection Act and the -Town's Wetland Protection By -Law. Mrs. Nichols noted
that HUD's principal interest is the insurance of structures against flooding rather
than the protection of wetlands-_ Mrs. Nichols said that they are waiting for reports
from Engineering and the Conservation Commission on this matter.
REPORTS
Q 171. Planning Director
Q
a. Hill Street Subdivision: Mr. Bowyer presented two alternative preliminary
subdivision skteches for a 3.7 acre parcel off Hill Street. He reported
that he had suggested to Leonard Colwell, the applicant,_ that they explore
a -different type of site plan that would have the same number of dwelling
units --(six) but with much greater flexibility in the siting of the units.
Mr. Bowyer suggested a technique of using an RIS zoning amendment to obtain
more site planning flexibility and avoid the lot area and frontage require-
ments of a conventional subdivision. He thought that might result in a
' site plan more compatible with the rough terrain which has many trees and
good vistas.
172. Chairman: Planning Board Syllabus: Mrs. Smith reported that she had recently
read three books from the Planning Department's professional library. She distribu-
ted written reviews of each of the books. She encouraged each member of the Board to
read books or reports on subjects of interest to members and to report back to the
Board. Mr. Bowyer had a collection of professional literature which members took for
"homework."
173. Planning Board Members, Subcommittees
a. Meeting - November 22: The joint meeting with the Board of Selectmen for
presentation of the findings of the Household Survey of Lexington Center,
which had been scheduled for November 8, has been postponed until Novem-
ber 22 at 8:15 p.m. It was agreed to meet at 7:30 that evening for regular.
Planning Board business.
b. Selectmen's Follow-up on Inclusionary Housing: Members discussed.a letter
dated October 19, 1982, from Selectmen Politi to Representative Markey
seeking the Congressman's assistance in obtaining a commitment from HUD
for the acquisition, by the Housing Authority, of units at Morrow Crossing
and Potter Pond which had been pledged to comply with the Planning Board's
policy. Mr. Sandy remarked that the Town should get on with establishing
separate lots for the publicly owned units so they are not subject to the
vote of the condominium association. Chairman Smith stated that she under-
stood that the letter to HUD was only one of what may be several approaches
to deal with the problem.
Minutes of Planning Board Meeting: 11/1/82 6
395
c. Board of Appeals Hearings, October 28: Mr. Sorensen reported that the Board
of Appeals and the Building Commissioner had difficulty with the Section of
the Zoning By -Law that attempts to measure the intensity of light of signs
in "foot lamberts." He said it would be desirable to have a method of
measurement, expressed in plain English, and capable of being measured by
an instrument in the field. It was agreed that Mr. Sandy and Mr. Sorensen
would work on clarifying the method of measurement.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:12 p.m.
LJudith( J. Uheig, clerk
COQ
Q
F
I
I