HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-09-14MINUTES OF LEXINGTON PLANNING BOARD
September 14, 1981
The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in Room G-15, Town Offices, was
called to order at 7:38 p.m. by the Chairman, Mr. Sandy, with members Nichols,
Smith, Sorensen and Planning Director Bowyer present. Mrs. Wheaton was absent.
175. Approval of Minutes
The minutes of the meeting of August 31, 1981, were corrected and on a m6tfoh by
Mr. Sorensen, seconded by Mrs. Smith, were approved unanimously as corrected.
DETERMINATION OF PLANNING BOARD APPROVAL
176. 72 Shade Street, Form A-81/12
The Board reviewed a plan of land of the Malkus property at 72 Shade Street.
On a motion by Mrs. Nichols, seconded by Mrs. Smith, it was voted 3-0:
The plan entitled "Subdivision Plan of Land in Lexington, Mass." dated
July 17, 1981, prepared by Miller and Nylander Company, surveyors of
Lexington, Mass., certified by Donald J. Forand, registered land surveryor,
with application form A-81/12, by Patricia K. Hagedorn, attorney for
Willem V. R. and Ulla Malkus, does not require approval under the Sub-
division Control Law.
Mr. Sandy abstained from voting because he is employed by the Raytheon Corp-
oration which is transferring a small parcel of land to the Malkus Family.
177. APPLICATIONS TO BOARD OF APPEALS'
The Planning Board reviewed a staff analysis, dated September 11, 1981, on appli-
cations to be heard by the Board of Appeals on September 24. On a motion by
Mrs.Smith, seconded by Mrs. Nichols, it was voted unanimously to make no recommenda-
tion on the applications re:
34 Circle Road, John Kelly: SP, continue use of dwelling
727 Marrett Road, Sheraton Lexington Inn: SP, sign
93 Hancock Street, Lexington Gardens: SP, Sunday opening in December
SUBDIVISION OF LAND
178. Trodden Path, Concord Avenue: Reduction of Surety
The Board was in receipt of a request from J/G Homebuilders dated August 19, 1981,
for a second partial reduction of surety. Memoranda from the Town Engineer dated.
September 10, and from the Planning Director dated September 11, recommended against
the reduction of surety. Mr. Sandy stated there ought to be a policy against fre-
quent requests for reduction of bond. Further, the Board should not vote any reduc-
tion of bond until the binder course is installed on the road, a step he noted was
necessary to protect purchasers of homes in a partially completed subdivision.
9/14/81
Page 2
On the motion of Mrs. Smith, seconded by Mr. Sorensen, it was voted unanimously
to deny the request for partial release of surety for the following reasons:
(1) The Board had just approved a reduction of surety on August 17, 1981,
(2) The binder coarse has not been installed on the road yet,
(3) The Town Engineer noted he did not see sufficient progress on out-
standing items beyond that in his memo of August 14, 1981, and
(4) The Board had seen no evidence of a resolution of the issue of the
trees on Lot 4, which are in violation of the Certificate of Action
179. WORK PROGRAM FOR 1981/82
The Board discussed a memo from the Planning Director dated August 13, 1981
entitled "Productivity" which discussed steps to obtain the most effective use
of staff resources and the human resources of the Board members. The main theme
of the memo was to achieve more efficiency in carrying out routine responsibilities
for the administration of land use controls so that more time is available for
planning projects. The Board agreed unanimously to take the following steps:
1. Hold no more than two (2) meetings, except for required public hearings
on zoning, in any one month.
2. Divide the meetings so that procedural matters are in the first part of
the meeting and comprehensive planning is in the second part.
3. Set a maximum time limit for most routine business items of 15 minutes
and no more than 30 minutes on any one agenda item except for discussion
of a policy item which should be limited to 60 minutes. It was agreed
these time limits would be guidelines rather than rigid limits.
4. Have adequate preparation for items on the agenda. There should be
something on paper, i.e., a draft report or letter for each item on
which the Board is acting.
5. The amount of staff effort expected should be related to the importance
of the work item. If Board members want a more detailed report on a
routine administrative item, the Board member will assume responsibility
for its preparation.
6. Members will assume responsibility for preparing letters or reports which
the Board requests during a meeting. This does not apply to letters or
drafts which have been prepared by the staff before the meeting.
7. Members are encouraged to use Monday evenings on which the Planning Board
is not meeting for individual projects or subcommittee meetings. The
Planning Director will work out proper notification with the Town Clerk
and Town Counsel to avoid any problems with the Open Meeting Law.
9/14/81
Page 3
8. Early attention will be given to requests for waivers in subdivisions.
In reviewing a preliminary plan, the waivers will be identified and
a poll, giving a sense of the Board, will be taken. In reviewing a
definitive subdivision, early in the process, a similar poll will be
taken on waivers required. The objective of the poll is to get a
sense of the Board on whether waivers are acceptable before extensive
work is done on other parts of the subdivision review. The effect of
the poll would be limited to the waivers requested and would not bind
individual members or the Board to a vote on the subdivision as a whole.
9. The Board will adopt a policy prescribing submission requirements for
RD and CD rezoning proposals. Chairman Sandy appointed a subcommittee
consisting of Mrs. Nichols, Mrs. Smith, and Mrs. Wheaton to prepare the
policy.
10. Proposed amendments to the text of the Zoning By -Law will be made by
revising whole chapters or sections at a time and not by individual
editing changes. It was agreed that the Planning Board would not pre-
sent editing articles to the 1982 Annual Town Meeting but may become
involved in zoning changes through the work of other committees, such
as the Accessory Apartment Committee.
11. The Chairman will send a letter to the Building Commissioner and the
Board of Appeals requesting that if they advocate amendments to the
Zoning By -Law, they should submit a written outline of what the section
should say. The Planning Board will not draft changes for them from
scratch.
180. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Mr. Bowyer reported that he. and a former associate of his who is now teaching
a planning course at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, would be supervising two
students who will be doing some work on the South Lexington -Waltham Street area
study.
181. REPORTS BY MEMBERS
181a. Meeting Schedule As the meeting scheduled to be held on September 28
coincides with the start of the Jewish holiday, it was agreed that the
schedule of meetings would be Tuesday, September 22,.and October'5 and 19.
181b. Capital Budget Requests: The Board discussed a memorandum from the Town
Manager requesting the submission of proposed capital improvement projects.
One item discussed was new photogrammetric maps.
181c. W. R. Grace Application: Chairman Sandy noted the need to obtain more
information about W. R. Grace operations in view of their pending applica-
tion before the Board of Appeals and their recent environmental experience
in Acton and Concord. Chairman Sandy will write a letter to W..R. Grace
requesting information on what they are currently doing and what they plan
to do with their proposed addition.
9/14/81
Page 4
181d. Revisions to Subdivision Regulations: Chairman Sandy appointed a sub-
committee of Mr. Sorensen, Mrs. Nichols and himself to work on revisions
to the subdivision Rules and Regulations. Each member should submit
suggested changes to the subcommittee which will then prepare a report
and submit it to the full Board.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
1AA4
Karsten Sorensen, Clerk