HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-04-13MINUTES OF PLANNING BOARD MEETING
April 13, 1981
The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in Room G-15, Town Offices, was
called to order at 7:38 p.m. by the Chairman, Mrs. Wheaton, with members Nichols,
Sandy, Sorensen, Planning Director Bowyer and Assistant Planner Asen present. Mrs.
Smith was attending a meeting with the Board of Selectmen and joined the meeting
in progress.
70. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
On the motion of Mr. Sandy, seconded by Mr. Sorensen, the minutes of the
meeting of April 6, 1981, were laid on the table. (Mrs. Smith joined the
meeting at this point.)
71. Environmental Notification Form: Colangelo Office Building, Bedford Street
Angela Frick, the Town's representative to the Metropolitan Area Planning
Council, was present to discuss the Town's response to the Executive Office
of Environmental Affairs on an environmental notification form for the pro-
posed Colangelo office building on Bedford Street. Mrs. Frick commented
that the Environmental Notification Form presented a good opportunity for
the Town to emphasize the traffic problems on Bedford Street. She suggested
that the Planning Board also write to EDEA; the Board agreed to do so. The
Board suggested several changes in the wording of the response which were
agreed to by Mrs. Frick.
72. Applications to the Board of Appeals
The Board reviewed a staff analysis, dated April 10, 1981, on applications to
be heard by the Board of Appeals on April 23, 1981. It was voted unanimously
to make no recommendation on the applications re:
23 Stimson Avenue, Frank Silipigni, Swimming Pool
643 Waltham Street, James Catalano, SP - Roadside Stand
17 Fairview Avenue, George Changelian, Variance - Rear Yard
1777 Massachusetts Avenue, Guenther Weinkopf, SP - Restaurant
30 Woodpark Circle, Martin Stiglitz, Variance - Front Yard ----- Mr. Sorensen
spoke against granting this variance because it is for nearly half the front
yard and he did not think it was proper to waive requirements because they
were inconvenient. Mrs. Wheaton noted that this is a new home built within
the last five years. It was agreed not to oppose the variance but to include
in the transmittal letter that the actual violation is greater than described
in the petition.
537 Lowell Street, Hugh Leichtman, SP - Use of Barn for Residence -----The
Board concluded that this is an unusual case because of the need to provide
housing for persons caring for a handicapped child. It was agreed to state
no objection to granting this special permit providing the conditions in the
existing special permit are maintained.
24 Hartwell Avenue, Michael Colangelo, SPS - Addition -----Mr. Bowyer described
the proposed addition for Data Resources, Inc., at 24 Hartwell Avenue. The
company is adding floor space for office use and converting part of its build-
ing across the street at 29 Hartwell Avenue to more computer hardware. To
understand the company's needs, the two buildings need to be considered together.
For zoning purposes, 24 Hartwell Avenue needs to stand on its own.
1
It was agreed that the "Guidelines for
in the meeting, would be the basis for
The Planning Director was requested to
culated to members prior to transmittal
SUBDIVISION OF LAND
Page 2
4/15/81
Peak Hour Limitations," adopted
the Planning Board's recommendation.
complete the report which will be cir-
to the Board of Appeals.
73. Ridge Estates II, off Ridge Road: The matter of setting the bond for this sub-
division was taken from the table. Mr. Bowyer reported that Town Engineer
Michael Hanlon had said an additional $10,000 should be added to cover the cost
of the drainage system and retention ponds. It was agreed that any other items
outstanding would be handled in determining the amount of the reduction of the
bond. On the motion of Mrs. Nichols, seconded by Mr. Sorensen, it was voted
unanimously to set the amount of the bond for this subdivision at $610,000, and
that the work described shall be completed within two years unless otherwise
approved by the Planning Board.
74. Trodden Path Subdivision, Concord Avenue and Blossom Street: The Board signed
the Certificate of Action approved at the meeting of April 6, 1981.
75. Battleview Subdivision, off Young Street: The Board reviewed a draft of the
Certificate of Action. Mrs. Wheaton identified certain items that needed to be
checked. On the issue of fire alarm boxes, it was agreed that a meeting should
be arranged with the Board of Selectmen to have a full discussion in which the
Planning Board's point of view could be presented. Mr. Sandy suggested that the
requirement for fire alarm boxes not be waived at this time and if the Board of
Selectmen indicates a policy that fire alarm boxes will not
be hooked up, then the requirement can be waived later. If a waiver is granted
now, the requirement can not be imposed later if that is the policy direction
coming from the Board of Selectmen.
76. Ingleside Subdivision near Maple Street: Mr. Sandy reported there were only
two minor items that needed to be dealt with. One is to change the reference
to "conservation easement," which implies the involvement of some public body.
The other is the drainage system and the depth of pipes and if the Town Engineer
is satisfied, then he would have no objection.
77.Policy on Hartwell Avenue Traffic - Commercial Develovment: The Board reviewed
a draft of suggested guidelines for peak hour limitations on new commercial
development in the Hartwell Avenue - Bedford Street area. Mr. Sorensen and Mrs.
Wheaton thought that the policy should not differentiate between construction
for existing companies in the area and new companies coming into the area. The
traffic impact is the same. Mrs. Smith thought the Town owed something to
companies who have been in the area for some time and they should not be subject
to requirements as restrictive as those for companies entering the area for the
first time. Mr. Sandy and Mrs. Nichols agreed with Mrs. Smith.
Several changes were made in the suggested guidelines. On the motion of
Mr. Sandy, seconded by Mrs. Smith, the Board voted 4-0, with Mr. Sorensen
abstaining, to adopt the guidelines, as amended, as a policy. It was agreed
that the policy would be sent to the Board of Selectmen and the Board of
Appeals for their comments and that a joint meeting should be set up. Mr. Bowyer
suggested that this policy should be applicable in the short term and further
technical work is needed on techniques of controlling the timing and intensity
of commercial development on land already zoned in commercial districts.
Page 3
4/15/81
78. Reports by Members
78a. Board of Appeals Hearings of April 9, 1981: Mr. Sandy reported on the
decisions reached by the Board of Appeals at their hearing on April 9,
1981. Several members expressed their concern about the approval by the
Board of Appeals of both the petition for variances and the special per-
mit for the office building on Hayden Avenue. It was agreed that a
letter would be drafted to the Board of Selectmen outlining the reasons
why this is a poor decision and that a meeting with the Board of Select-
men would be requested.
78b. Hanscom Field, Flight Service Station: Mrs. Smith reported on the A-95
review of the FAA flight service station at Hanscom Field. The facility
is a building for weather forecasting material. There are a number of
unanswered questions, particularly why a 2.5 -acre site is needed for a
10,000 square foot building. The proposal is too vague for an area sensi-
tive to development and a total development plan is needed.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:54 p.m.
1
1
Laura F. Nichols, Clerk