HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-09-171
1
1
PLANNING BOARD MEETING
September 17, 1979
The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board was called to order at 7:35 p.m.
by the chairman Dr. Friedman with members Nichols, Sandy, Zabin, Wheaton,
Planning director Briggs, planning,intern Steven Asen and secretary Mrs.
Snow present.
Mr. Zabin will represent the Planning Board at a Board of Selectmen meet-
ing on September 24, for discussion of complaint of residents of the heavy
concentration of subsidized housing in the Reed Street area. Letter from LOW/MOD
Joseph W. Angelo, dated September 12, 1979, regarding the matter was HOUSING,REED
noted and discussed. STREET AREA
At 8 p.m., about 40 Lexington Center property owners, and interested
citizens, and the CBD Committee met with the Board for the third of three
related meetings for discussion about the future of Lexington Center.
Among the areas of concern noted were parking problems and possible new
parking areas, attempts to create a transitional zone at the perimeter
of the Center, Historic District Commission controls and restrictions,
and the need to attract diversity in Lexington Center. Property owners
were asked for specific suggestions on problems that can be resolved by
Town agencies. Complaints of lack of parking in various sections of the
Center were prominent. Discussion followed on possible construction of
an underground parking garage, different methods of metering and charging
for all -day parking, new parking requirements in CB districts, expansion
of existing parking lots. Reference was made to the meeting of consumers
and users of the Center, at which parking was not stated as a major prob-
lem, and listed concerns stated at that meeting. Question was raised as
to what type of business constitutes a drawing to Town Centers as compe-
tition to shopping malls. Comparisons with other Towns whose centers have
more pedestrian traffic were made and it was suggested that Lexington
Center may have to change its function to increase its vitality. Planning
Board members suggested merchant promotions to encourage shopping in the
Center. The landowners were asked opinion on the reason for turnover of
tenants, especially in the Central Block. Parking need, mall competition,
and type of users/residents were listed. A meeting with the CBD Committee
will be scheduled for October 2 at 9 p.m. to review information gathered
at the three meetings and to discuss Committee work and goals.
LEXINGTON
CTR. PROPER-
TY OWNERS
Preliminary plan of lots at Concord Avenue and cross section plan of the HAMILTON
road, submitted by William Hamilton, were reviewed. Unfavorable review SUBDV.CONCORD
by Anthony Casendino, D.A.C. on lack of sight distance at exit onto AVENUE
Concord Avenue from the proposed development was, noted. Upon a motion
duly made and seconded, it was unanimously VOTED:
To reject the subdivision plan entitled "A Preliminary Plan of Lots
in Lexington, Mass.", dated July 29, 1979, submitted by William H.
Hamilton, applicant.
The reasons for rejection are as follows:
1. The retaining walls on either side of the subdivision road create
poor sight distances for vehicles egressing onto Concord Avenue.
2. The retaining walls create a sight problem for traffic on Concord
Avenue.
3. The driveways onto the proposed house lots are excessively steep.
4. The grading across the road at Station 0+0 is too stee
1, .
1
11
5. The 10% grade of the subdivision road, as shown on the profile plan
is not in compliance with Section 6.5.5 of the Rules and Regulations
Governing the Subdivision of Land in Lexington, Mass.
6. The height of the retaining walls creates a potentially dangerous
situation for people walking in the area.
7. The length of the cul-de-sac exceeds that allowed under Section 6.5.6
of the Rules and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land in
Lexington, Mass.
The planning director was authorized to sign the letter of rejection
following its preparation in final form, as set forth in the motion.
The Board reviewed Dr. Friedman's draft letter to the Lincoln Planning
Board responding to Lincoln's request for Lexington commitment regarding
mutual concerns about Hanscom Field growth in use. The letter was unani-
mously approved as written. Jacqui Smith, Hanscom Advisory Committee,
was present for discussion of Hanscom and need for improved communication
with Massport.
Mrs. Nichols' draft letter to William Smith, developer of Potter Pond,
confirming Planning Board concurrence regarding units deleted and added
was reviewed and unanimously approved as written.
The minutes of Planning Board meeting of September 4, 1979, were
unanimously approved as amended.
The meeting adjourned at 10:50 p.m.
Frank Sandy, Cl rk
Page 2
9.17.79
HAMILTON
SUBDV.(cont'c
HANSCOM
FIELD
POTTER POND
MINUTES 9.4