HomeMy WebLinkAbout1969-06-09PLANNING BOARD MEETING
' June 9, 1969
A meeting of the Planning Board was held in its office on Monday,
June 9, 1969 at 7:30 p.m. Chairman Lund opened the meeting with
members Clarke, Graham and planning director Zaleski present.
The minutes of the May 19, 1969 meeting were approved as corrected. MINUTES
At 7:30 p.m., Mr. J. Little of Americana Corporation, Mr. Harry AMERICANA CORP.
Berglund and Mr. Donald Nickerson, Chairman of the Board of Appeals, OFFICE BUILDING
met with the Board to discuss Americana's petition for a finding
and determination concerning a proposed office building to be located
at 1034-1050 Waltham St. Mr. Lund stated that the proposed building
does not conform to height and parking regulations required by the
Zoning By -Law. Mr. Little asked for a clear position on what the
Board would require. After discussion of ways to meet the require-
ments, it was suggested that Americana Corporation repetition the Board
of Appeals for a finding and determination for an office building
300' x 60' with two stories and a basement if they can provide the re-
quired parking for this size building. Mr. Nickerson agreed this would
be necessary and Mr. Little agreed to revise his plans and submit them
to the Board of Appeals by June 16, 1969.
The minutes of the June 2, 1969 meeting were approved as corrected. MINUTES
' A letter to Oak Park Corporation relative to the release of security OAK PARK I
held by the Town until completidin of work on Oak Park I Subdivision RELEASE
was discussed and upon a motion duly made and seconded, the Board
VOTED:
An inspection of the Oak Park I subdivision discloses that
the following required items of work have not been completed
in accordance with the terms of Oak Park Corp.'s agreement
with the Town of Lexington:
1. Installation of stone bounds.
2. Installation of one drain catch basin at Grant St.
3. Laying of 25' of 12" R. C. drain at Grant St.
4. Construction of a headwall at Vine Brook
5. General cleanup.
The estimated cost of the above work is nearly equal to the $2,000
bond held by the Town to ensure the completion of this subdivision.
The Planning Board finds that the required work has not been per-
formed as stated and denies request for release of the security
held by the Town.
A report prepared by Mr. Lund on the Nurseries amendment was
reviewed and approved by the Board.
Next discussed was the Procedural Rules' amendments prepared by
Mr. Lund. Upon a motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED:
To approve the amendments.
NURSERIES REPORT
AMENDMENT
PROCEDURAL RULES
REPORT
June 9, 1969
A letter from the Town Engineer regarding the Woodberry Rd. sub- WOODBERRY ST.
division was read and discussed. It was suggested that a copy SUBDIVISION
of this letter be sent to Dr. Smith for his reactions to the
Town Engineer's recommendations.
The requests for the sale of tax -title lots referred to the TAX TITLE LOTS
Board by the Selectmen were considered next. It was decided to
recommend that Lot 31, Map 72 (Earl and Ash St.) be retained
by the Town pending the completion of studies of potential housing
for moderate -income families. The Board had no objection to the
sale of Lot 35, Map 59, to Mrs. Pallis of 19 Hayward Ave. to be
added to other land of the same owner and not as a separate building
lot.
Planning director's memo of June 9, 1969 was discussed next. It TRAFFIC STUDY
was agreed that Mr. Zaleski will prepare a letter inviting proposals PROPOSAL
for traffic study authorized under Article 103 of the 1969 A. T. M.
for review and approval by the Board.
It was decided to inquire into the possibility of instituting a code WORKABLE PROGRAM
enforcement program using the existing personnel, so as not to lose
eligibility for the re -certification of the Workable Program.
The notices of the petitions for Board of Appeals hearings on June 24,B/A NOTICES
1969 were noted and placed on file. JUNE 24, 1969
The Town Office Building additbn was discussed next. After brief TOWN OFFICE
discussion, the planning director was asked to submit the entire BUILDING ADDITION
design to members of DAC for their comments on space reallocations,
specifically the meeting room, and ask for recommendations to be
submitted to the Board by June 30, 1969.
It was agreed to reply to M. Friedman's letter regarding airport AIRPORT
approach zones, pointing out that the Board had no jurisdiction in APPROACHES
the matter.
f
The planning director reported on a tour of the Grey Nuns property GREY NUNS
and facilities on Massachusetts Ave. Although this was an information PROPERTY
tour, the Town will receive a plot plan of this property. The Board
will ask the Selectmen to see these plans when they are received.
The Board reviewed the plan submitted by Design and Process Engineering DESIBN &
and discussion, on the area along Rt. 2 and the possibility of utilizing PROCESS
this lot for office and development offices in the field of food process- ENGR.
ing machinery, followed. It was the consensus of the Board that this
use was contrary to the whole plan of the development of this area. The
planning director was asked to write Mr. Marion Cheek, stating that the
Board would not support variances which would lead to such a concentrated
use of this lot.
The discussion of Drummer Boy submission procedure was postponed. DRUMMER BOY
SUBDIVISION
June 9, 1969
-3
At 9:15 p.m. the Conservation Commission (Chairman Stanley Brown, CONSERVATION
Francis K. Smith, Jules Sussman, Frank Totman, Mrs. Frick and Mrs. COMMISSION
Shriber) met with the Planning Board.
It was agreed that members of the Conservation Commission will review INTERIM OPEN
the draft of the Interim Open Space and Conservation Plan and forward SPACE
their comments in writing to the Planning Board for consideration at
the first meeting in July.
Members of the Conservation Commission expressed the desire to be TAX TITLE LOTS
informed by the Selectmen of any sale of tax title lots.
A brief discussion took place regarding the feasibility and the legal GRAPEVINE AVE.
requirements for the subdivision of the northeasterly portions of
long narrow lots at Grapevine Ave. It was pointed out that Kendall Rd.
does not have adequate construction to serve as access to any new sub-
division street. The previously recorded lots may be reduced in size
by acquisition for public use, but vacant lots may require Board of
Appeals variance to permit the building of houses after a reduction of
area.
The Conservation Commission has been asked to explore the means of PROTECTING
protecting Lexington brooks from either pollution or from drying out BROOKS
as result of development.
' The Commission feels strongly that some type of part-time permanent PART-TIME
help is essential to a continued performance of their functions. A ADMIN. HELP
great deal of red tape and administrative work is involved in applying
for outside reimbursements, in assembling documentation for land
acquisition and there is also a growing need for the management of
conservation lands. It was suggested that the services of an additional
employee in the office of the Planning Board could be shared by the
Board and the Commission. Mr. Lund suggested that a job title which
does not duplicate an existing function and refers to a specific
physical, rather than a general administrative activity, would be
desirable and asked the Commission to prepare a tentative job
description.
A discussion followed regarding the general policy approach to conser-
vation acquisition. It is apparent that no conservation plan can be CONSERVATION
implemented without eminent domain takings and without paying more ACQUISITION
than the market price for some of the vacant land. The only alternative
is to limit the acquisition criteria to land availability and price.
In response to a question from the Conservation Commission, the planning DRUMMER BOY
director said that the definitive plans for that portion of the Drummer SUBDIVISION
Boy Subdivision off Winter St., approved by the Board of Appeals, are
being drawn by a surveyor.
Chairman Lund reminded the Commission of the possibility of using BOY SCOUTS
scouts for clearing work in conservation areas, provided the scout
troops follow the regular procedure in obtaining accident insurance.
It was recommended that Paul Mazerall be requested to present a work
program for the scouts.
June 9, 1969 -4
' Mr. Lund asked the Conservation Commission to consider the
acquisition and preservation of open space at the top of the
hill next to the standpipes, buying up the unused rear portion
of Lincoln St, lots. A plan of the area and a list of owners
were viewed by the Commission.
The preparation of a development plan for the area on both sides
of Woburn St. was discussed next, including the watershed study
for the area and the preservation of wetlands and of the small
pond off Carnegie P1.
LINCOLN ST.
LOTS
WOBURN ST.
WATERSHED STUDY
Upon a motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED: EXECUTIVE
To go into executive session to discuss matters the disclosure of SESSION
which could adversely affect the financial interests of the Town
or the reputation of any person.
Following a discussion of the appraisals of the land to be acquired LAND OFF
off Hayden Avenue and owned by Busa (formerly by Verdone), the Board HAYDEN AVE.
voted to resume open meeting. The Conservation Commission withdrew
at this time.
A letter from the Town Engineer relative to the 27" hickory in the PADDOCK LA.
path of the proposed sidewalk on Paddock La. was read and discussed. HICKORY TREE
It was decided to ask the owners affected whether they would be SIDEWALK
willing to grant pedestrian easements to locate the sidewalk on
their lots and preserve the tree.
It was noted that the Board had received no reply to its letter of D.P.U.
May 14 to the State D.P.U. relative to underground wiring costs. UNDERGROUND WIRY(
The planning director was asked to follow up on this. COSTS.
The discussion of conservation and wetland zoning was indefinitely WETLAND ZONING
postponed and it was decided to discuss the revision of Subdivision
Regulations on July 14.
It was the consensus of the Board to check with Town Counsel TOWN COUNSEL
regarding the propriety of showing on a definitive subdivision plan RE: DRUMMER
blocks of lots as ungubdivided over -size lots, as proposed by the BOY SUBDIVISION
Drummer Boy developer. The Board did not agree to a waiver of the LOTS
requirement for a final grading plan.
The meeting adjourned at 11:10 p.m.
T Jou
Erik Lund, Chairman