HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-08-29PLANNING BOARD MEETING
August 29, 1966
A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board was
held in the Board's Office, Town Office Building, on Monday,
August 29, 1966. The meeting was called to order by vice-
chairman Greeley at 7:30 p.m. with members Riffin and
Worrell and planning director Zaleski present.
Mr. Storer, accompanied by some 22 residents of the
Bowman Park area, met with the Board to discuss the history BOWMAN PARK -
of and need for Emerson Rd. or another road connecting EMERSON RD.
Massachusetts Ave. and Rte. 2. Speaking for Bowman Park
Assn., Mr. Storer asked that the Planning Board consider
the installation of a parallel road and that the Planning
Board inform the Bowman Park Association by August 30 (after-
noon) of the Board's plans and thinking regarding the streets
in the area, particularly as regards a widening of Pleasant
Street.
Mr. Ralph DeNunzio objected to the proposed opening of
Mason St. extension onto Pleasant St.
Mr. Greeley replied, explaining the revisions in the
' plans for Emerson Rd. resulting from land developments and
town meeting actions. Mr. Greeley stated that the present
plans for Emerson Rd. are for the segment to Great Meadows
only and that traffic increases between Mass. Ave. and Rte. 2
may largely be taken care of by an improved intersection at
Mass. Ave. Neither the Board, nor anyone else, has the solu-
tion to the traffic problems connected with Worthen Rd.,
Pleasant St. and Rte. 2, but such solutions will have to be
found in the next few years, hopefully without destroying the
Wilson farm.
Mr. DeNunzio questioned the wisdom of widening Pleasant
St. and Mr. Greeley pointed out that the Board does not neces-
sarily advocate the widening and that the improvement of traf-
fic may be accomplished by re -design of intersections.
Mr. Arthur Brock mentioned that the idea of widening
Pleasant St. occurred as a result of Planning Board's remarks
at the public hearing on Peacock Farm, Sec. VI.
Mrs. Storer stated that the intersection of Pleasant
St. and Mass. Ave. has been a problem for many years.
Mr. Mark Moore, Jr. and Mr. Goldberg met with the Board
next and presented a preliminary subdivision plan of land off TODD REALTY
East St, near Ridge Rd. The proposed subdivision would be a PRELIM. PLAN
"cluster" development of 14 lots with about 2.35 acres left OFF EAST ST.
open, to be used for a community swimming pool for the resi-
8-29-66 -2-
dents of the neighborhood subdivision. The question of who
would be allowed to use the pool besides the residents of the
immediate subdivision and the question of the permissibility '
of having a bath -house on the land were discussed briefly and
it was decided to obtain Town Counsel's opinion on these
questions.
The failure of Pond Realty Trust to comply with the
POND REALTY agreement to complete Augustus Rd. on time was discussed
next and the Board voted to request the Town Counsel through
AUGUSTUS RD. the Selectmen to enforce the bond guaranteeing the construc-
tion of this subdivision to the extent necessary to complete
the required work promptly.
Mr. Alan Wilson of Wilson Farm, Inc, appeared before
EMERSON RD. mthe Board and stated that Emerson Rd. location along the
WILSON FARM southeasterly part of the farm would hurt less than a
widening of Pleasant St. Mr. Wilson stated that the Wilsons
would be willing to donate the land for Emerson Rd. to be
constructed by the town in the location near West farm.
The Board next discussed the action on Peacock Farms,
PEACOCK FARMS Sec. VI in relation to objections and recommendations of the
SEC. VI Bowman Park Association. The Planning Board decided to
approve the subdivision and request Benjamin Franklin Homes,
Inc. to relocate street connection to Wilson Farm as far as
possible to the east, subject to the usual guarantees for
the construction of ways and utilities and with building re-
striction on some lots.
Definitive subdivision plans as follows were received
by the Board:
WOODBRIDGE EST. Woodbridge Estates, dated 6-17-66 by Miller & Nylander,
C.E.'s & Surveyors (Nickerson Rd.)
BRIDLE PATH EST. Bridle Path Estates, dated 8-5-66 by Miller & Nylander,
C.E.'s & Surveyors (Paddock Lane)
Pub lic hearings on these subdivisions were scheduled on
Hearings
September 26 in Estabrook Hall, as follows: Woodbridge Es-
tates, 8:00 p.m.; Bridle Path Estates, 8:40 p.m.
Letter from Norman T. May relative to his petition
NORMAN T. MAY
that the Board of Appeals allow the remodeling of 4624-26
BOARD OF APPEALS
Muzzey St. for professional offices was read. After dis-
cussion the Board decided to have Mr. Zaleski draft a letter
to the Board of Appeals that if the requested variance is
granted, it should be subject to conditions similar to C 1 dis-
trict to conform to long range thinking of the Planning Board.
The draft will be mailed to Board members for review.
The Board decided to advise the Selectmen that the
'
TYLER RD.
condition of approval of Tyler Rd. subdivision requiring a
connection to Appletree Lane should not be a condition pre-
8-2i-66 -2-
cedent to the acceptance of Tyler Rd. as a town way, nor is
' the need for the connection so urgent as to justify eminent
domain takings at this time,
Planning Director's memo of 8.23.66 relative to a
buffer between North St. residence of Mr. Rizza and the BURLINGTON
industrial complex in Burlington was discussed. It was de- BUFFER
cided to arrange a meeting with the Burlington Planning
Board.
After a brief discussion, upon a motion duly made
and seconded, the Board unanimously PROCEDURAL RULES
VOTED: to adopt the "Procedural Rules of the Planning
Board," dated September 1, 1966.
The minutes of Planning Board meetings of July 25 and
MINUTES
August 15, 1966 were approved.
Plan submitted with the following Form A application
was reviewed by members of the Board and endorsed as not
FORM A
requiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law:
#66-37, submitted August 24 by Francis E. Burke,
Burke
entitled "Plan of Land in Lexington, Mass.", dated
July 29, 1966, Miller & Nylander, C.E.'s & Sur-
veyors.
Planning Director's table of required improvements to
be used as a guide in determining the status of streets was
STREET STATUS
discussed briefly. No date was set for a continuation of
the visual inspection tour, but Mr. Greeley offered to view
the streets in question, if given a list, and make recommen-
dations.
Upon a motion duly made and seconded, the Board
VOTED: that the construction of way and the installation of
fiEEN7VALLEY
municipal services in the Green Valley Sec. 7 sub-
division having been partially completed to the
BUSA
satisfaction of the Planning Board, the penal sum of
the bond guaranteeing such construction and installa-
tion is reduced from $25,000 to $3,000, as requested by
the developer and recommended by the Town Engineer.
A letter from the Woburn Planning Board suggesting
WOBURN PLAN -
a joint meeting to discuss zoning was read. It was decided
NING BOARD
to ask Woburn Planning Board to suggest several convenient
dates.
Mr. Zaleski told the Board that the cluster zoning
provisions of the Town of Wilbraham are practically identical
WILBRAHAM
'
to Lexington's, except that they do not require going through
CLUSTER ZONING
the Board of Appeals.
8-29-66 -4-
Notices of Board of Appeals hearings on September 13,
1966, were noted and placed on file. '
Chairman of the Board of Selectmen, Lincoln P. Cole,
PEACOCK FARMS Jr., met with the Board to discuss the situation with regard
SEC.VI to Peacock Farms Sec. VI (Mason St. Extension) and the objec-
tions of the Bowman Park Association. Mr. Cole agreed that a
study of means to improve traffic between Mass. Ave. and Rte. 2
should be done as soon as practicable either by the staff of
the Town Engineer's office or by a consultant engaged through
the Town Engineer's office.
Following Mr. Cole's departure, the Board reconsidered
and rescinded its decision to approve Peacock Farms, Sec. VI
subdivision. This action was based on the following consid-
erations:
1. The definitive subdivision plans had been with-
drawn by the applicant for modification and only returned the
night of this meeting, thus the Board had no opportunity to
review changes or modifications made on the plans.
2. The conditions of approval, i.e, which lots would
be restricted by a Covenant and what security would be
furnished for the way and utilities to serve other lots, the
description and grant of the necessary easements, and the
exemption of certain lots from the approval for the reasons '
of public health were not defined..
It was decided to meet with Mr. White of Benjamin
Franklin Homes, Inc. at 8:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 6, 1966,
to discuss item 2 above and any possible revisions of the de-
finitive subdivision plan.
The meeting adjourned at 12:05 a./m.
Natalie H. Riffin,
Clerk
�J