HomeMy WebLinkAbout1962-12-17PLANNING BOARD MEETING
' December 17, 1962
The Lexington Planning Board held a regular
meeting in its office, Town Office Building, on
Monday, December 17, 1962 at 7:45 p.m. Present were
Chairman Grindle, Members Bryson, Campbell, Mabee
and Meyer, and Planning Director Snow.
Considered was the following Form A applica-
tion for determination of Planning Board jurisdic-
tion:
#62-59, submitted December 121 1962 for Mary
M. Cox by Wilbur C. Nylander; plan entitled
"Plan of Land in Lexington, Mass.", Scale:
l" = LSA', dated Oct. 26, 1962, Miller &
Nylander, C.F'.Is &. Surveyors.
Upon motion duly made and seconded it was
unanimously
VOTED: to confirm the action of three members of
' the Board in determining on December 12,
1962 that the nlan accompanying Form A
annlication #.62-89 did not require approval
under the Subdivision Control Law and in so
endorsing said. plan.
Mr. Grndle reported that he had discussed
with Mr. Albert W. Wunderly, attorney for Chester
and Wendell W. Locke, the possibility of the town
acquiring for recreational purposes the Locke land
situated in Lexington. (See minutes of planning
Board meeting of December 10.) Mr. Grindle said
that Mr. Wunderly confirmed the fact that there
was friction in the Locke family and that there
were two other Locke brothers represented by an
attorney, Mr. David L. Whitney. Mr. Grindle stated
that he understood that Mr. Wunderlen would com-
municate with Mr. ':!hitney and attempt to arrive
at an agreement in regard to the sale of the said
Locke acres and that afterward Mr. Grindle would be
informed of the results of the attempt to arrive at
said agreement.
The attention of the Board was called to a
letter from the secretary of the Appropriations
' Committee scheduling a meeting of the Planning
Board on Monday, January 7 at 9:00 p.m. to review
the Planning Board's proposed budgets for 1963.
FORM A
LOCKE
LAND FOR
RECREATIONAL
PURPOSES
12-17-62
The remainder of the meeting was devoted to '
MASTER PLAN a discussion of the tentative draft of the Board's
summary report of the master plan as edited by Mrs.
Fernberger. She met with the Board from 9:00 p.m.
until the end of the meeting to discuss the various
items in the draft and questions which were raised
in regard to it. It was decided that the best
method of bringing the draft to final form was for
Mrs. Fernber7er to meet separately with Mr. Snow
and the author of each cha-oter of the -oroposed re-
port before reorganizing the entire draft which had
been submitted for consideration.
Thomas S. Grindle
Chairman
1
I�