HomeMy WebLinkAbout1961-10-231
1
1
pLAnTITT7rrr BOAnD MFFTTNG
October 23, 1961
At 7:3.0 p.m, on T•Tondav, October 23, 1961, the
Lexington planning Board held a regular meeting in
Its office in the Town Office Building. Present were
Vice Chairman Brindle, 7Tembers Tyson, 1,1abee and
Hever and Plannin7 Director Snow.
The Board apnroved the minutes of its meet- MTM7TES
ings held on September 1R and 2K, 1961.
Approved for payment by the Board were the
follow.nq bills which I -ad been presented: sraphi.c BILLS
lenroductions, Tnc., white nrints--`11.95: American
Society of Planninc, Officials, Information Advisory
'Peport--33.20.
Considered next were notices of public hear-
ings to be held by the Lexinr^ton Historic Districts HISTOTlTC
Commission on October 25, 1961. It was decided. to DTSTRTCTS
take no action on the anplications for certificates C014MISSION
of appropriateness to re considered at said hearings.
Considered also was the following Form A
application for determination of Planning Board
,jurisdiction:
4161-62, submitted Oct. 18, 1961 by John H.
Millican; plan entitled "A Compiled Plan of
Land in Lexin7ton--Mass.", Scale: 1" = 1001,
dated Oct. 11, 1961, Miller R- Nylander, C.E.'s
and SurveTrors .
It was decided to delay action on said appli-
cation until the next meeting of the Board rending
submissi-on of sufficient evidence to indicate that
the elan accompanyinr? the application was not a sub-
division.
Mr. Wilbur '% Jaquith.'s letter of October
19, 1961 to the Planning Director was read to the
Board. (See addendum, also minutes of the ATovember
Iti, 1960 Planning Board meeting.) The correspond-
ence in this case was discussed. Mr. Snow pointed
out that the rear nortion of the Barnes premises
was only one of three properties adjacent to the
walkway to the Fiske School it was desired to ac-
quire for nublic recreational purposes. In connec-
tion with this proposal 'rr.Snow was asked to write
to the trustees of the %loodland Bird Sanctuary to
FORM A
BARNES LAND
FOR
RECFFATION
P71PPOSF.S
IC -2'-61
-2-
WOODLAND
see if th.ev were willing to convey to the Town
BIRD
the land comprising said bird sanctuary with a deed
SANCTTTARY
restriction that this land be continued to be used
for only this purpose.
From 8:00 to 8:25 n.m. Mr. Llewellyn T.
SCHOFTFLP
Schofield o f the office of Schofield Brothers, civil
engineers and land survevors, 'Framingham, met with
the Board in order that he might discuss the eisposl-
tion of elan which was submitted to the Board for en-
dorsement as one not requiring annroval under the
Subdivision Control Law. Mr. Schofield discussed. the
Dlanning Board's letter of September 19 to his firm
(see minutes of "lanning Board meeting of Sentember
18, 1961) stating that In his onini.on the Board under
Section 81-R. of said law could waive strict compliance
wit!-, its rules and regulations. He asked that the
Board discuss the Alan with the Town Counsel. The
Board agreed to do this and took the elan under ad-
visement.
Matters having to do with the Board of Anneals
BOAPr OF
were discussed next. Notices of netitions to be
APPEALS
heard by said Board on October 21i_ and Yovember 14,
-
1961 were considered. Tt was decided to take no
CLIFFORD
action in regard to the petitions to be heard on these
dates with the exception of the Clifford netition. A
draft of a letter setting forth the T'lanninR Board's
view of said Clifford's petition was considered and
approved. (See addendum.)
Mr. Snow re-corted on the status of the Emerson
EMERSON
Gardens Section One definitive subdivision plan and
GARDFnTS
the application for a determination with reference to
GARDEN
the rmerson Gardens garden apartment site and build-
APARTMFTITS
ing plans. after receiving this report and discuss-
ing it with the Town Counsel later In the evening,
the Board asked 11r. Grindle to notify the Chairman of
the Board of Anneals that all the land in the garden
apartment district shown on the subdivision plan had
not been acquired by the arolicant and that technical
difficulties in preparing a brant of easements instru-
ment ',ad delaved the endorsement of said subdivision
elan and Its recording.
Town Counsel Stevens met with the Board from
8:50 to 9:30 n.m. for the purpose of discussing
current problems which the Board had under considera-
tion.
The Board adjourned is meeting t 10:00 p.m.
Robert E. Mever,
Cle
1
1
F
r
10-13-61
-3-
October 19, 1961
Mr. Samuel P. Snow, Planninr, rirector
Lexington Planning Board
Lexington, T,-'assacrusetts
"e: Mrs. Maizie A. Barnes
43 Adams Street Premises
Dear Sam:
This will confirm my telephone conversation with you to-
dav to the effect that ",Trs. Barnes has decided that she does
not want to enter into any aPreement with the Town of Lexing-
ton for the sale to the Town at this time of any -portion of
the rear land of the above premises.
This decision by her has been reached subsequent to my
original discussions with her in the fall of 1960 at which
time I first contacted you on the -possibility of such a sale.
I see no reason, however, why you should not keep in mind
the possibility of sucha sale at some time in the future if a
real need for acquisition of some of this land by the Town
arose. Mrs. Barnes is fully aware of the fact that the rear
portion of her nrooerty next to the Fiske School walk way is
being* used by the school children for unofficial access to
the westerly end of the Fiske School buildi.ng and she has in-
formed me that she did not object to such use. I do feel,
however, that ,your ori.rrinal su7gestion for the acquisition
of 2.25 acres of this land brings the dividing line too close
to the Barnes buildin-s and makes the remaining parcel too
small under -present day lot sizes. Accordingly, if ,you should
take this matter up again some time in the future, T suggest
that the amount of land then proposed to be acquired by the
Town be considerably reduced.
Sincerely yours,
Isl 'TrLBUF M. JAQTTTTH
WMJ:LFS
cc: Mrs. _Maizie A. Barnes
October 2L, 1961
Board of Appeals
Town Office Building_
Lexington 733 Mass.
Pe: Lorraine Miller Clifford petition
Uith reference to the petition of Lorraine Miller Clifford
for permission under Section 14 (c) of the Zoning By-law to
create a mother-in-law suite in the residence at 523 Lowell
lo -"q-61
-4-
Street in accordance with plans accompan71nTr said
petition, the Planning Board has considered this petition
and respectfully sets forth its view in regard to the
same.
Tt appears from an examination of the plans that regard-
less of what it may be called, what is really being*
created is an apartment. There is no assurance that
after the suite which has been created for this particu-
lar situation has served its purpose that the apartment
won't be available for future rental purposes. The
creation of an apartment obviously violates the inten-
tion of the zoning; by-law. Tt is the Planning Board's
view that preservation of a sin7le family residence dis-
trict is so basic to the very concept of zoning that if
apartments are allowed in residences as proposed the
effectiveness of the zoning by-law is greatly damaged.
The Planning Board, therefore, wishes to be recorded as
being onnosed to the granting of the Clifford petition.
Sincerely yours,
LEXTNGTON PLATT `'G BOARD
/s/ Thomas S. Grindie,
Vice Chairman '
1