HomeMy WebLinkAbout1961-02-13PLA.,:NT,?G BOA -PD MEFTT7G
' February 13, lg61
regulnr meeting of the Lexington Planning
Board was held on Monday-, February 13, 11'61 at 7:30
n.m. in the Planning; Board office, Town Office Bui.ld-
in�. rrdsent were Chairman Burnell, members Grin dle,
Meyer and Soule, and Planning Director Snow. Town
Counsel Stevens net with the Board from 9:15 until
10:00 p.m. to discuss several matters being currently
cons_dered by the Board.
The Board read with great pleasure the
announcement of the marriage of the Planning Board's
secretary, ',irs. Louise T11. Bakes, to Mr. Kenneth F.
Macomber on February 10, 1961. Members of the Board
asked Mr. Snow to extend to Mrs. Macomber the Board's
congratulations and best wishes.
The Board a.pnroved the minutes of its January
23, 1961 meeting.
Considered next was the following Form A
annlication for determination of Planning 'hoard
' jurisdiction:
X61-3, submitted February 10, 1.961 by Mary S.
Cond_inho, William Condinho, Anent; plan en-
titled_ "Plan of Land in Lexington, Mass.f4,
Scale: 1" = 401, dated Feb. 1, 1961, Miller
8- Nvlander, C.F.'s ?- Surveyors.
Unon motion duly made and secorded, it was
unanimously
IIOTFD: that the Lexi_n�ton Planning Board determines
that the plan accomnan74n7 Form A applica-
tion 1"61-3 roes not require approval under
the SuY-�d vieion Control Law, and that said
elan be so endorsed.
The attention of the Board was called to a
copv of the To,, -in Counsel's letter, dated February
10, 1961, to the Selectmen informing them that the
trustees of Tufts College had released to the Town
all conditions, prescriptions and limitations as to
the use of the nareels of land that were conveyed
to the Town by Augustus F. Scott i_n 191LL and 19151
the instrument settint* forth said release being
dated February 1, 10')1 and recorded February 10 in
the Middlesex South District Registry of Deeds.
MTNTTTFS
FORM A
CF?\TTRAL
SCHOOL AND
PECRFATION
ARBA
-2-
Tn connection with said release Mr. Snow gave
H.856
a report of the ubli.c hearing held in the State House
n
'
by the Committee on Towns of the Massachusetts Legis-
lature on House Bill No. 856, said bill authorizing a
town to use for school, nalS-ground or recreational pur-
noses and for all purposes incidental thereto the parcels
of land in Lexin?ton given to the Town b<r said Scott by
two deeds. Mr. Snow said he had been informed that after
the exec,uti_ve session the Committee had reported favor-
abh* on the bill.
Distributed to the Board were conies of Articles
ARTTCLFS FOR
48, 402 50 and 51 - ich had been inserted in the warrant
WARRANT
of the Annual Town Meeting, Art. 48 at the request of
the Board of .Anneals, and. Articles 405 50 and 51 at the
TO'.dAT
request of the Planning? Board. Tt was decided
to hold
MKIETING
on March °, 1061 pt, 7;30 n.m. in Fstabrook
FIall a nub-
lir- hearing on the nronosals to amend the Zoning By-law
as set forth in said articles.
Mr. Snow exhibited for the Planning Board's
BOARD OF
information nlans accompanying the Bianchi, Lange and
APP"ALS
Millican neti.tions to be heard by the Board of Appeals
on February 28. The Board took no action in regard to
the Milli -can petition.
Later in the meeting the Board discussed the
'
Bianchi and Lane petitions which sours t Board of
Anneals permits for apartments for housekeepers in
the Bianchi. and Lange residences presentl7 under
construction on Tufts Road. Mr. Stevens expressed the
onini_on that both proposals were obviou.slz* violations
of the intent of th.e zoning by-law. He stated. that
preservation of single fami.17T residential districts was
so basic to the veru concept of zoning that if apart-
ments were a7_lowed in residences as nronosed, zoning b7 --
laws might as well be abolished. The Board decided to
oppose vi_Torously the granting of the BSar_chi. and Lange
reti.ti_ons. Mr. Soule was asked to appear at the hear-
ing in regard to said nett --ons and to express the Plan -
n nm Board's views.
"lead to the Board was a letter, dated February
WP.LTHAM ST.
10, 1461, from the Chairman of the Board of Anneals in
GAFDFI?
remard to the Vine Brook Fealty, Trust site and bui.ldi.n
APA77TMT71'
plans which had been submitted to the llanni_ng Board
DISTRICT
for consideration on February 2, 1961. -Mr. Snow re-
ported that his examination of the buildi.ng and site
plans indicated that they were not in form for construc-
tion purposes althou7*h obvicuslir they met the Planning
Board's recommendations as to exterior building designs
and the locations of buildings, parking: areas, etc. He
stated that there were minor grading problems which would
2-13-61
' be created if t}e plans Caere followed as drawn and
pointed out the lack of sufficient spot elevations
to cnsble a contractor to set I?rades for all walks
and paved areas. we also noted the lack of drain
data and relationship of drains to the plan and rro-
file of ''merson Road as shown on the V'ne Brook
t,_eadows Section 2 definitive subdivision elan
annroved by the Plannin7 Board on January 235 1061.
These matters were discussed with Town
Counsel Stevens later in the meetin^ with sneci_al
reference to the nlanni_ng Board's letter of June
20, 1060 to Mr. Arthur G. Manaseli_an, architect.
(See mim.ltes of nlanning Board meetinm of June 20,
1060.) It was narticularly noted that there was not
included in the set of building and: site plans as
submitted a buildi.nf- location plan. It was decided
t'ierefore not to write a final report on said plans
until the follox,inm meeting* of the Planning Board.
Mr. Snow i-ia s asked in the meantime to confer with
the building inspector and the Superintendent of
Public '.<iorks and inform Mr. Manaselian of all the
i.nfo.rmat .or which had to be added to the set of
-dans before being; acted upon by the T'lanninF Board.
' The attention of the Board was called to a
letter, dated lebrzzary 10, 1061, from the Chairman
of the Board of Selectmen to tiie Chairman of the
"Planning Board w1th reference to a joint discussion
held on i'ebru:ar7T 1 between the two boards in regard
to the formulation of a -joint co-mittee of four to
screen rezon;nn nronosals before the nlannin�^ Board
was asked to stud7T the same. (See addendum.) The
Chairman as'_.ed 'Sr, t'rindle and Mr. Soule to serve
on said corm'ttee.
After Pr. Stevens left the meeti.nr, the Board
*ave final consideration to the application for
tentative annroval of the Minute Man Highlands Sec.
It preliminary subdivision clan. Attention was
called to a letter dated February 7, 10611 notify-
ing the Planni.n 'hoard that the Board of Health did
not annrove of said subd'.vision at this time. Unon
motion du lv made and seconded, it was unanimously
NOTED: that the nr^liminary subdivision plan en-
t'_tled 't ,,elimi_nary Plan Minute Man High-
lands, Section 4 i.n Lexin^ton, Mass.", dated
January 6, 161, which was submitted to the
Board by James A. Carrig on February 1, 1061,
accompanied by an annlication for tentative
an nroval of preliminary elan, Form B, dated
Jarnza ry 31, 1061, be and r_ereby is d i sanproved
for the reason tr^t said subdivision has only
one means of access,
RFZONTvG
PROPOSALS
Cr)PJIMTTTFE
MINUTE MAN
HIGHLANDS
SEC. 4
CARRIG
It was decided to write Mr. Carrig a letter
informing him the Planning» Board's action in regard
'
of
to his nlan and also noi_nting out that a sewer would
have to be installed in the whole subdivision, access
for water and sewer nrovided, a trunk sewer installed
along the general location of Clematis Brook and a
street arrangement developed which would avoid exces-
sive excavation as in the case of "C" Street shown on
the plan. Mr. Snow suggested that after he completed
his studies for the development of the areas adjacent
to the nronosed location of Emerson Road from Lawthorne
Road to Adams Street and from East to Woburn Streets,
he undertake a detailed study of the area adjacent to
the nronosed location of 'srortren Road from � a.rrett Road
to the Cambridge -Concord Highway, He suggested that
this information be included in the letter to Mr,
Carrig.
The meeting adiourned at 10:115 p.m.
Levi C. Burnell
Chairman '
AD'_DB'NTDTTM
February 101 1961
Mr. Levi G. Burnell, Chairman
Lexin-ton Planning Board
Lexington 73, Mgssachusetts
Dear Mr. Burnell:
3s a result of the joint discussion of the Planning Board
and the Board of Selectmen last week (Feb. 1) Alan Adams
and I have been arroi_nted the two Selectmen to serve with
two members of the Planning Board on the screening commit-
tee which was agreed anon at that time.
Are we in agreement that the nurpose of the committee is
to encourage or discoura-e new business enterprises for
Lexinrrton. ^11 inquiries, whether to the Manning Board., i
Selectmen or individual members, requiring rezoning for
suggested use, are to be: referred to and screened by the
committee before the Manning Board is asked to f*iv them ,
further time and study.
The cor-inIttee Is also to review as soon as possible the
2-1j-61
-5-
I
proposals which have been received recently enough to b e
.
cons.derea 'ac+„lve,.n
The pur.nose of this screenin7* committee Is not to encourage
exploitation of Leamington but to encourage desirable enter-
prises to ap-oroach us with reasonable plans. Many town
have set un special committees to search out "customers"
but this is not our idea.
We have all been aooroached individually concerning one
project or another. If all projects can have their
initial nresentation to this screening; committee much
time shall be saved for every*one, and Lexington should
benefit.
RM:m
1
i
Very trul-�r ,yours,
Isl ?uth Morey
Chairman