HomeMy WebLinkAbout1959-04-06PLANNING BOARD MEETING
' April 6, 1959
A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning
Board was held in the Planning Board Office, Town
Office Building, on Monday,April 6, 1959 at 7:45
p.m. Present were Vice -Chairman Grindley Members
Burnell, Mabee and Soule and Planning Director Snow.
Town Counsel Stevens was also present from 8:30 to
9:15 p.m.
Approved also were the following bills which
had been submitted for palrment: Spaulding -Moss,
white prints --X8.00; Minute -man Publications, adver-
t, -sing -44.90; Allen Bros. Cor ., l stamp --41.70;
F.B.McArdle, Kraft envelopes -.00; Samuel P. Snow,
car allowance for March, 1959--"=20.00.
Considered next by the Board were the fol-
lowing Form A applications for determination of
Planning Board jurisdiction:
#58-25, submitted April 3, 1959 by Anthony
R.Cataldo; plan entitled "Land in Lexington,
Mass.", Scale: 1" = 40', dated Mar .1959,
J.F.Kerwin, Engr. of Design.
#59-26, submitted April 31 1959 by Mrs.F.L.
Spellenberg; plan entitled "Plan of Land in
Lexin"ton-Mass.", Scale: 1" = 40', dated
' Oct. �, 1957, Miller & Nylander,-C.E.'s &
Surveyors.
Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was unani-
mously
BILLS
FORMS A
Mr. Gustaf Larson of Arlington met with the
Board from 7:45 to 7:50 p.m. and discussed a revised
LARSON
proposal for subdividing his land fronting on Oak
-
Street. (See Planning Board minutes of November 18,
OAK ST.
1959.) Said proposal was in the form of a plan en-
SUBDIVISION
titled "Property of Gustaf Larson, Lexington,Mass."$
dated Mar. 1959, and drawn by Fred A. Joyce, Surveyor.
The plan was taken under advisement and Mr. Larson
told that he would be notified of the Board's in-
formal opinion in regard to the proposal. When the
matter was discussed later during the meetingy Mr.
Snow was asked to stud7 the proposal and recommend
action to the Board. This he stated he would do in
conjunction with a plan he was preparing for a re-
development of the Hillside Avenue area.
Approved by the Board were the minutes of
MINUTES
its March �O$ 1959 meeting.
Approved also were the following bills which
had been submitted for palrment: Spaulding -Moss,
white prints --X8.00; Minute -man Publications, adver-
t, -sing -44.90; Allen Bros. Cor ., l stamp --41.70;
F.B.McArdle, Kraft envelopes -.00; Samuel P. Snow,
car allowance for March, 1959--"=20.00.
Considered next by the Board were the fol-
lowing Form A applications for determination of
Planning Board jurisdiction:
#58-25, submitted April 3, 1959 by Anthony
R.Cataldo; plan entitled "Land in Lexington,
Mass.", Scale: 1" = 40', dated Mar .1959,
J.F.Kerwin, Engr. of Design.
#59-26, submitted April 31 1959 by Mrs.F.L.
Spellenberg; plan entitled "Plan of Land in
Lexin"ton-Mass.", Scale: 1" = 40', dated
' Oct. �, 1957, Miller & Nylander,-C.E.'s &
Surveyors.
Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was unani-
mously
BILLS
FORMS A
4-6-59
VOTED: That the Lexington Planning Board determines '
that the plans accompanying; Form A applica-
tions #59125 and #59-26 do not require approval
under the Subdivision Control Law and that said
plans be so endorsed.
At B:00 p.m. the Board held a public hearing rela-
BATTLE tive to the application of the Leeland Construction Co.,
GREEN Inc. for approval of a definitive subdivision plan en -
VILLAGE titled "Battle Green Village Section Three Lexingtons
SEC. 3 Mass." Mr. Leeland G. McConchie, President of said cor-
poration, and Mr. Philip J. Knox, Jr. of 18 Greenwood
LEELAND Streets Lexington were the only two persons present at
CONSTR. the hearing. Mr. Grindle read the notice of the hearing
CO. as it had been sent to all persons deemed to be affected
and as had been published in the March 19s 1959 issue
of the Lexington Minute -man. He then explained the
procedure in conducting the hearing and called upon the
subdivider to present the subdivision plan.
Mr. McConchie stated that Section Three of the
Battle Green Village development comprised a subdivi-
sion of lots fronting on extensions of Freemont Street
and Oxbow and Constitution Roads. The question was
raised in regard to the locations shape and purpose of
the unmarked parcel of land between lots 40 and 41 as
shown on the plan. Mr. McConchie replied that he was
not sure of its purpose but thought it might be for a
future street location. Mr. Knox stated that he owned
lots 222 through 227 on the undeveloped section of Free-
mont Street to be constructed by the subdivider was to be
connected with the section of said street outside the
boundary of the Battle Green'Village property. He said
that he thought if both sections were connected they would
serve as a short cut between Cedar Street and Paul Revere
Road and that the connection would be undesirable. Mr.
Knox was informed that it was the Planning Board's opinion
that both sections of Freemont Street should be connected
and that the Planning Board proposed to recommend that
the section abutting the subdivider's property be laid
out as a town way.
There being no further questions or discussion
the Chairman asked for an expression of opinion of
those present in favor of and those opposed to the
approval of the definitive plan. Mr. McConchie indi-
cated he was in favor of approval. No one indicated
opposition to approval. Thereupon, the subdivision
plan was taken under advisement and the hearing declared
closed at 8:15 p.m. ,
The Board next considered the draft of a proposed
4-6-59 -2-
' letter to the Board of Appeals in regard to the
petition of the Lexington Park Trust for permission BOARD OF
to erect a 20' x 46' metal sign at the northeast APPEALS
corner of the Routes 2 and 128 intersection. (See
Planning Board minutes of March 30, 1949.) The
Planning Board approved said draft which was signed
by the Vice -Chairman. (See addendum.)
Mr. Stevens came to the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
at which time the Board discussed with him various
current matters before the Board. Particular atten- PROPOSED
tion was given to a bill introduced into the State LEGISLA-
legislature, said bill being,"To change the exemption TION
of religious and educational institutions" and BILL 5.236
numbered 5.236. Before taking a position in regard
to the proposed legislation, it was decided to wait
upon action of the Legislative Committee considering
said bill.
Mr. Stevens left the meeting at 9:15 p.m.
GARDEN
Mr. Soule displayed a set of plans entitled APARTMENT
"Proposed Multi -family Housing for Mr. Joseph Trani, MULTI -FAMILY
dated 16 June 10,58, and prepared by Charles H. HOUSING
Cole II, -Architect. Mr. Soule stated that Mr.
' Joseph Trani, owner of the property numbered 1037- TRANI
1019 Massachusetts Avenue had employed Mr. Cole to
prepare a plan showing how said property might be
developed as an apartment zone. It was further
stated that Mr. Trani wished the Board's informal
opinion in regarc. to the plan and the possibility
of rezoning the property as an apartment district.
It wasointed out that rezoning so small an
area as a 1-11 acre lot would constitute spot zon-
ing and so be illegal. Since the lot together with
adjacent southeasterly properties were zoned as a
two-family residence district, it was thought it
might be possible to assemble land, extend Spencer
Street northwesterly and thence southwesterly to
connect to Massachusetts Avenue, and build two-
family houses on lots fronting on said extension of
Spencer Street. Mr. Soule stated he would so in-
form Mr. Trani and return said set of plans to him.
After further discussion of current matters
under consideration by the Boards the meeting was
adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
i
Rich rd H. Soule, Clerk
ADDENDUM '
April 6, 1959
Board of Appeals
Town Office Building
Lexington 731 Mass.
Gentlemen:
At its meeting on March 30, 1959 the Planning Board
discussed the petition of the Lexington Park Trust to
erect a sign approximately 20 feet by 46 feet at the
northeast corner of the intersection of Routes 2 and
128. It was the unanimous decision of the Board to
go on record as being opposed to the granting of said
petition and to set forth the Planning Board's reasons
for its opposition.
It has long been the policy of Lexington to prohibit
large free-standing signs, particularly those as 1w ge
as billboards and of that character. Such signs are
entirely out of keeping with the environment standards
this Town is endeavoring to establish and maintain.
Furthermore, the Planning Board believes there is no '
justification for the erection of such a sign as the
Trust wishes to erect. It is understood that there
has been sold or leased to the Raytheon Manufacturing
Company all the C 3 district land bounded by Spring
and Shade Streets, Routes 2 and 128. The Planning
Board sees no reason, therefore, for Cabot, Cabot &
Forbes or any of its subsidiaries to advertise the so-
called Lexington Office -Research Park.
Very truly yours,
LEXINGTON PLAI\r, TNG BOARD
Isl Thomas S. Grindle,
Vice Chairman
1