Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1956-10-29 r r PLANNING BOAPD MEFT AG October 20, 1956 A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held In the Town Engineer 's Room, Town office Build- ing, on Monday, October 29, 1956 at 7:30 p.m Chair- man Hathaway, members Abbott, Adams, Burnell, Grindle and Jaquith were present. Mr. Snow and the secretary, Mrs. Milliken, were also present Mr. Harold F. Stevens, Town Counsel, was present from 0:40 to 10 30. The r'oard approved the minutes of its meetings MINUTES of march 5 and October 8, 1956. The following bills were presented for pay- ment : Minute-man Publications, Inc. advertising-- BILLS 67.50; U.S.Government Printing Office, census publi- cations--t)i.L45; Samuel Snow, reimbursement of ex- penses for period ending October 26, 1956--*15.23; Mary G. Campbell, secretarial services for period ending October ?6--x`'25.00; Anne H. Milliken, secre- tarial services for period ending October 26--A10.00. It was moved by Mr. Grindle, seconded by Mr. Abbott, and voted (Mr. Adams not voting) to approve payment of the bills as presented. Read to the Planning Board were the notices of petitions to be heard by the Board of Appeals on BOARD OF Nove"ber 6, 1956. It was decided to take no action APPEALS on said petitions except the one of LaCava to use a - building numbered 10117 Waltham Street as an office. LA CAVA Notes were dictated to Mr. Snow, he being asked to incorporate these in a draft of a letter to the Board of Appeals setting forth the Planning Board ' s objec- tions to the granting of said LaCava petition. Also read to the Board was a copy of a letter, dated October. 2L2 1956, from John E. Ward, 15 Robin- MIDDLE son Road, to the Superintendent of Public Works of RIDGE Lexington requesting action on a drainage problem SFC. 1 which Mr. Ward claimed Techbuilt, Inc . was creating on his lot as a result of filling lot 26 on Turning Mill Road. A sketch attached to said letter and showing the problem involved was exhibited to the Board. It decided to place the letter in the Board's files in regard to the Middle Ridge Section One sub- division so that the matter might be referred to at such time when Techbuilt, Inc. wished to have its performance bond for completion of work in said sub- division released. The following Form A applications were token FORMS. A under consideration for determination of Planning Board jurisdiction #56-89, submitted October 20, 1956 by Robert ?. Carrig, Agent for Olive T. Carrie*; plan entitled "Plan of Land in Lexington-Mass.", scale 1" = 40 ' , dated Oct 20, 1056, Miller & Nylander, C E. ' s & Surveyors 756-90, submitted October 20, 1056 by Donald E. Watson, Trustee, pl.n entitled 'Part of Land Court Case 5982E Revised Plan of Lots 11 and 12 Lexington Mass. ", Scale 1 in = 40 ft , dated Oct . 24, 1956, William J Ford, Jr. , C.F Upon motion duly made and seconded it was unan- imously VOTED: that the plans accompanying applications #56-89 and #56-90 be signed bearing the endorsement "Lexington Planning Board approval not required under the Subdivision Control Law " In connection with the endorsement of the elan MIDDLE RIDGE accompanying Form A annlication 4'56-90, Mr Snow re- SEC . 2 norted that the Town Counsel had informed him of the obtaining of an agreement between Donald E Watson TFCHBUILT and Techbuilt, Inc in wh ch Watson had granted Tech- built an easement for passage over Gould Road in return for a drainage grant from Techbuilt to Watson. Mr. Snow indicated that it was now in order for the Board to endorse the Middle Ridge Section Two definitive sub- division plan which he said he woild give to the Town Counsel for recording in the Registry of Deeds. Mr. Snow exhibiteda sketch nlan he had prepared WITHERELL showing the extension of Eldred Street between Justin OPTION and Grove Streets through land of Richard H. Soule and Lawrence H. Witherell. Mr. Snow then gave a report of ELDRED STREET his negotiations with Mr . Witherell and the terms ETENSION under which he believed an option could be obtained. (See also minutes of August 6, 1956 Planning Board Meeting. ) In his renort Mr Snow said that Mr . Wither- ell was in agreement with the proposed road location and the suggested lotting of his land as shown on the sketch plan. Mr Snow also said that Hr. M therell was willing to grant to the Town for 6300 00 the per- petual right and easement to use for all purposes for which town ways are commonly used all the land in- cluded within the location of the nronosed road as shown on said plan, the grant being subject to the following conditions (1) that the nronosed extension 10-29-56 -2- of Eldred -treet would be constructed by the Town under the betterment act and (2) that the Board of Selectmen would agree to extend the time of navment without interest for the betterments assessed against Mr litherell' s land until it was built upon or sold Mr Snow was authorized to proceed with the obtaining of an option to purchase for no more than 4300.00 an easement across Mr. Witherell 's land subject to the conditions as outlined. From P 50 to 9 lc' n.m. Mr John F. MacNeil, Mr Alfred B. Troneano, attorney, and Mr. Diehard S MAC NETL Morehouse, architect, met with the Board Mr. Tropeano said that he had requested the appointment with the Board to discuss the situation of his client with reference to the variance the Board of Appeals had granted Mr MacNeil for construction of a building on Depot Square and to the nronosed street connecting Denot Square and Meriam Street . (See minutes of August 1 and Sentember 10, 10'6 Planning Bo"rd meetings ) Mr Troneano then stated the Selectmen had agreed to lay out and construct said nronosed Street and his client in turn had agreed to delay construction of his build- ing and to face it on the nronosed street Fe said that now it had been found that the street is to be only 17 .62 feet wide including a sidewalk. Mr. Tron- eano concluded his statement by saying that in view of the narrowness of the nronosed street and the appearance of the buildings owned by Mr Scott on the other side of the street, he and Mr. MacNeil and his architect still believe that the best way to develop the land under discussion would be to face the MacNel building on Depot Snuare There was exhibited a flan which Mr Troneano said illustrated the way it was desired to locate the Mace?e 1 building, the rlan being prepared by Mr. More- house, dated October 2q, 1956, and entitled "lot Plan commercial Building for John MacNeil Denot Sauare Lex- ington Mass " After numerous questions and much dis- cussion about this plan, the chairman asked what the schedule was for the construction of the building Tyr. Troneano said that so much time had elapsed without the cm struction of the nronosed street or a rezoning of the remainder of the Trac'-Til lot that "r MacNeil was forced into a breach on his Hart of the agreement referred to above The Chairman said members of the Planning Board would want to discuss the matter among themselves and then discuss it with the Town Counsel and. the Selectmen Town Counsel Stevens met with the Board from 9 4i' n.m. to the end of the meeting to discuss various matters currently before the Board The first matter discussed with him was that in regard to the MacNeil case. It was pointed out to T'Ir. Stevens on t}- e xylan referred to a Bove that the nronosed %acNeil building cid not face on the nro- nosed street and did not have a 10-ft. rear yard in accordance with the agreement "r. -Tac7ei1 had made nrevinusl1r . Tr. Stevens suggested that these facts be brought to the attention of the Selectmen. The Planning Board adjourned its meeting at 10.30 n.m. C ? Levi G. Burnell, Jr. Clerk