Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1934-05-18IT ra�.T 1f3, 1934 ' is "-i'•F'�tln7 oft'," 111Y11nEs �3Oar(3. '`,TaS h.e1d. in t1"le Oonference oom of the o m Uffice Build .nn,f on ldav, ,,-a-, lo, 1934, at 7.30 eUte_n sr �. ,.., i. .. DuffirY Ulynn,urecle7-1 :'.11b',11, and UChcibe wore -ore sent . 1'r. Luff-., �,;as elected, on .r. "ilynn+s riotion, to serve as Lei-Jnr"tonl s rel-)r.sentative on the i:eLional Planning Board. J_r. 1)uffv a mounced that there would be a Town , eetin3 on June 25, 1934, and that articles for said `mown-Loeting should. be in by June 5, 1934. Discussion of the zonin,,of i, -.ass. avenue between '. oburn atreet and Vine roof; s c7,'ed -,i t the ioar•d fell; that the present status became la,"r under false pretenses; thl.t the Board felt that this v°!'_tole area s!' ,ul_d e in a residential zone; t' at the ore sent status was r)refera:ale to t",at _ic':i existed )rior to t%ie '?'or:!n I eeting of Lass. larch 26, 1934. It .:<as voter; to holm _earin s ane submit articles to the °'o;rn . eetin l) to see i'' t.nc "oning iv -Lai.; will be amended Avenue so , that the south side of i!%ss. lvenue ',rill be in a residential_ zone, and 20 to see if Vie i'own cTishes to chap e the north side of the Amend - avenue back to a business zone. i:.r. rirlball ex-oressed the opinion, which seemed to be salared ments by the rest of the-ioarclI that the Board should urge the passa,f-;e of first r;ronosal, but s_�_ould, in anT- event, oT)oose the passage of 'the the second, his feelinL bei i^; that it is better to have one side of t -e avenue in resicential zone than to have both sides in business. ,_r. .'i -,ball moves. that the Board _sold hearings on the two proposals mentioned above. `i'-te -motion teas unanimously passed.. .1r. .:r;ele-- roved t ,- t tele sate of the hearing be set for onda r, June llt;;?. '_ potion passed unanimously. . .°ras 1:r. Greeley broua;ilt ur the question of newspaper publicity in connection '•ri t'n cro ects sponsored by the i1clanning iDoard. It seemed to be t`ie o-)ini.o:a of t'-1ose present Hat the "Lexington Ltinute- Ean" }-lad sho,,,,•ed little interest or s-7,opathy in the Planning Board's recent - r.•ojests, and that the hoard should endeavor to het more support and bac'«im f-lor,: the local mess. The lerk was instructed to pre- pare a ".Letter to the editor" exolai.nin'c and supporting the Board's new proposals, said letter to be anl)roved b; the Board before publica- tion. i.1scu.ssion of Er. ".'.K. GreelesTfs petition for an extension of 3elfry Bo1fry 'i'errace s__o­led the matter could not be carefully con- Terrace sidered1-JJt1i.out ascertaining more information regarding the property* of i::r. ollis '11;cbster. The Cler1. ':,,as instructed to advise lir. Greeley to consult 'e _ti. --r. ebster on this point. Leeting Z,Tas adjourned. at 9:15 I'. i'•=. Respectfull3. subrmttted, Roland B. Greeley (Signed) Clerk