HomeMy WebLinkAbout1934-05-18 IL �. i 1 :0 .1.1 _:TI. G
a� 18, 1934
I ,. meetin ci t; 'e 1 I enning joard '-raS held in the Conference
Loom of the ' o''n Lffice ..wild .nnp on i'iiday, ,,_ay lo, 1934, at 7:30
P. L . , ess: s. uf i Y, Sls=nn, ree le--, im_h 11 , and ache ibe wore
present .
_r . Luff- was lected, on i r. i1Ynn' s notion, to serve as
Le-iar"toni s representative on the :.egional Planning Board.
;, r. i"uf1 v a i -ounced that therg would be a 'town i eeting on
June 25, 1:)34, and that articles for said 'sown :. eeting should be in
by June 5, 1?34.
Li scussion of tie zoning of Lass. Avenue between oburn Street
and Vine roc': s-io''er t. t t the board fell; that the present status
beca_re la under false pretenses, that tne soard felt that this
,znolo area s ould be in a residential zone , t-iat tne present status
was ?referable to teat ic.i existed ,prior to tie To-'n. Leeting of Lass.
e, arch 26, 19,54. it 1- ,.s voter to hold nearinrs anc suomit articles
to the c o' n eetinr, 1) to see ii t.nc oning 3:7-Law will be amended Avenue
so that the sort 1 side of lass . ,,veno.^ 'rill be in a residential zone,
and 20 to sea if the :'oTn ishes to c_iange the north side of tae Amend-
avenue bac ? to a bi sihess zone.
T. ._imbdll eYnressed twee opinion, wnich seemed to be satared merits
by the rest of the boare , that the Board should urge the passage of
I
the first ;ronosal , but s__ould , in anY event , on .ose the passage of
the second, his feelin bei-ir twat it is better to have one side of
tne avenue in residential zone than to have both sides in business.
I_r. ni^'call moved that the Board hold hearings on the two
proposals rientionef above . `1 >e motion las unanimously passed..
r. ,r ole- moved t z_t t re date of the hearing be set for
ondam June lltn Inc notion °'as uassed unanimously.
1:1- . teon ar brot :Tt up the question of newspaper publicity
in. connection w i tri -,ro iec'-s sponsored by the ilanning 3oard. It
seemed to be tip opinion of taose present that the "Lexington L,inute-
'r, an" had sho-•ed little interest or s,-r,nathy in the Planning Boards s
recent "r.•o leets , and tp.at the Loard should endeavor to get more support
and bcc Linc- nom the local press . The ulerk was instructed to pre-
pare a ".Letter to the editor" exulain_inT and supporting the Boardts
new proposals, said letter to be aparoved bT- the Board before publica-
tion.
1:$ scu.ssion of Lr. '' .h . creelesr' s petit on for an extension of Belfry
ieifr- 'Terrace s__c"ed to t the matter could not be carefully con- Terrace
siderert .+ t 'out ascertaining more information regarding the property
of i. r. .ollis ebstor. ihe 61er'.. "'as instructed to advise Lr . Greeley
to consult - tri r . ebstor on treis point .
I
L eetine was adjourned at 9 15 t . b .
Respectfully submitted,
Roland B. Greeley ( signed)
ulerk