HomeMy WebLinkAbout1933-11-17PLANNING BOARD HEARING
November 17, 1933
' A Planning Board Hearing was held in Bstabrook Hall, Cary
Memorial Building, Friday evening, November 17, 19330 to con-
sider the advisability of amending the Zoning By -Law and Map
so as to change from a C.1 to an R.1 District all areas now
embraced within the C.1 District on the northeast side of
Woburn Street and Massachusetts Avenue extending from Fletcher
Avenue to Vine Brook, and on the southwest side of Massachusetts
Avenue from Winthrop Road to Wallis Court, or any part of such
areas.
Messrs. Duffy, Robinson, Glynn, Scheibe and Kimball were
present. The secretary was also present.
Mr. Duffy took charge and read then notice which appeared
in the paper and which was sent to 151 property owners in the
area designated by the Planning Board. He also explained that
the Planning,Board was impressed with the lack of necessity
of such extensive business areas in Lexington and believed that
the first allotment was very general but experience in Lexing-
ton and other communities seems to indicate that a much smaller
linear footage is required for the business needs of Lexington.
He stated that one of the owners of considerable property
named in the petition had stated to the Town Meeting and'in-
dicated to the Planning hoard that he would like to see this
' change made and he and others have indicated that in the
Interest of the Town and to safeguard the Town property. The
purpose of the hearing was to find out how the property owners
in the area felt about it.
Mrs' Sexton, 1519 Mass. Avenue, representing her mother,
Mrs. Leary, who owns the property at the corner of Fletcher
Avenue and Mass. Avenue, stated that they were opposed to any
change being made and wishes the property to remain as it is.
Mr. Paul McDonnell, representing Daniel J. O'Connell,
and Olive C. Myers, stated that he wished to record their
objection to the change.
Mr. Duffy asked him if he knew Mr. O 'Connell ' s state-
ments made before the Town in favor of the change and Mr.
McDonnell replied that he did not.
Mr. H. B. Lamont, ',Ninthrop Road, stated that he was
surprised to learn that the property in question was business
and while he did not think he was really affected by the change,
he would like to see the district kept residential. He also
stated that as he would not like to see filling stations at
the corner of Mass. Avenue and Winthrop Road, he would very
strongly favor making it a residential district.
Dr. William L. Barnes, 1557 Mass. Ave., owner of property
adjoining the Town property, stated that he always felt that
it was rather unnecessary to have made this property business
as it will be a long time before the Town will need that area
for business purposes. He reported that he had several offers
to sell the lot below his house for stores but had refused
to do so and thinks it will be for the best interests of the
Town to keep both sides of the street in a residential area
until the Town needs it and then it can be changed.
Mr. Theodore A. Custance, stated that he appeared on
notice received himself and was not representing the Baptist ,
Church. He said he notified the executives of the church but
none appeared. He remarked that he was glad to see that the
Planning Board had taken this move as he felt that when the
Zoning Law was started, many unnecessary,business districts
were made. He feels that it would be wrong to let the
property opposite the Town buildings be built up as a business
district, and would like to see the district changed to a
residential zone. ,
Mr. H. B. Lamont again stated that he would like to see
the corner lot at Mass, Avenue and Winthrop Road kept residen-
tial and favors changing the property between the Baptist
Church and Winthrop Road to residential property, In regard
to the property on the other side of the Baptist Church to
Wallis Court, he felt that it is very near the garage and an
existing business section and if the people in that section
wish to retain it as business., he had no objection.
With respect to the Town buildings, he said he would
like to see them protected and thought it up to the Town to
act irrespectively if they wanted to protect them.
Mr. Duffy asked if any others wished to speak and as
no one wished to do so, the hearing was declared closed at
8:45 P. M.
Respectfully submitted, 1
Clerk
1
PLANNING BOARD MEETING
November 17, 1933
' A meeting of the Planning Board was held in the Confer-
ence Room of the Town Office Building, Friday, November 17,
1933, after the hearing in Estabrook Hall, Messrs. Duffy,
Glynn, Kimball, Robinson and Scheibe were present. The clerk
was also present.
Mr. Glynn suggested writing letters to the Baptist Church,
Edgar Thivierge, Anstiss Hunt, Nobert English and Mrs. Erma
L. Burgess and call to their attention the fact that the
Planning Board held a hearing and they were not represented
and the Board would like their opinion as to the advisability
of the proposed change.
Mr. Duffy felt also that there should be something to
show on record and that the matter should be taken up with
the Town Counsel in regard to damages in this case. Mr. Mass, Ave.
Duffy then talked with Mr. Wrightington on the telephone on Zoning
the matter and was advised that no damages can accrue and
the owner would be protected under the non -conforming use.
He also thought it wise to get the opinion of the property
owners who did not appear at the hearing.
Motion was made and seconded that the clerk be instruct-
ed to write to the Board of Trustees of the Cary Memorial
Building and those owners of property who were not present
' or who did not express themselves at the hearing as to
whether they favor the proposed change, and it was so voted.
Mr. Robinson read a letter from the Board of Selectmen
requesting that the Planning Board continue their study of Sickle
Sickle Brook as they were anxious to get an appropriation Brook
at the March, 1934, meeting to do the work.
Mr. Robinson read a letter from Federal Emergency Ad-
ministration on Public Works stating than an amount of money
had been set aside for surveys putting unemployed men to
work. If a project is put before the local board, assistance Survey
will be given. The Chairman suggested that the local board Projects
meet with Fir. Cosgrove and the Chairman of the Selectmen and
find out from headquarters how the money is loaned.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 P. M.
Respectfully submitted,
I Clerk