Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1930-10-20 PLANNING BOARD HEARING October 20,1930 8:15 - 9:00P M. "For consideration of the proposal to change from an Rl District to a Cl District the lots of landlocated at the south- west corner of the junction of Bedford Street and Valley Road mad also at the southeast corner of the junction of Bedford Street & North Hancock Street." Mr. Emery took charge and explained that the Planning Board was inclined to think that if the Smith property is put in- to the Bustness District, the other corners should be changed also. Mr. Edward. A. Meade:- 15 North Hancock Street. When he bought the property last July, he nicked this neighbor- hood because he thought it was a nice, quiet residential section. Wants it kept so. There is enough element of danger in the traffic at this point without more stores. 'Lo put up stores now would decrease the valuation of his property. He does not see the need -of more stores. There are two stores vacant in the Manor Crescent for some time. Mr. J. J . Brady:- Nonresident, lives in Lowell but owns land on Bedford Street across from Coal Company yard. Feels that there are a lot of residential districts and wants this section made bustness. He does not think it is residential because of the coal yards in front of his lot. Had chance to sell but people refused because of coal yard opposite. Stated that Mr. Meade would be far enough away from the stores if any were built. ij Mr. E. A. dei aaQ:- Said Mr. Brady stated that he, Mr. Meade, would las far enough away from the stores. If •: the stores were built on the Parks property, he would be abutting them. Objects very strongly. Mr. Thomas Kelly:- Bedford Street next to Parks property towards Town. Has discussed the matter with Mr. Parks , •. about zoning and found that he also thought a '"' residential district at this lbcaiity was out of place. This section was zoned by the Town as residential but Burrill ' s property opposite ,`. the North Lexington Station is not residential „, • and the Railroad property is residential. The are various demands for business there at that corner. Has had an offer for the property in the lot south of where he lives if it were a business district. The people wanted a team* The offer was far beyond the value now. The land is too high for a residential district. When the street was constructed, it was lower`. ,a` People don't want to climb stairs to their `Y residence. It would cost a lot to remove the ; . earth to make it level with the street. g. q • ,-VW II 1 4 } 11 About 20 feet of Burrill ' s property, 100 feet "' r lir , along the brook and 30 feet along the railroad ,, II is not very much like' residential property'. Mr. Emery:- Stated that there is 250 feet of North Hancock n` Street and 200 feet of Bedford Street in the business zone. Asked Mr. Kelly if he didn't think that would accomodate a tearoom. Mr. Kelly:- Replied that it wouldn't take care of it and 5 that it should all be rezoned and put into the business zone . It has got to come eventually. z It is not desirable to build houses in the near vicinity of a coal yard or railroad. Mr. E . A. Meade : - Stated that two stores in the Manor Crescent °_ would not be unoccupied for over two years if 4' there is such a demand for business. ;; Mr. E. F. Scheibe:- Stated that he built a house for his foreman, Ernest LaRose, on Harding Road and that Mr. LaRose and his neighbors were opposed to the change. x¢ Mr. Thomas Kelly:- Asked why there should be objections from the outskirts of this section. It has got to be turned into a commercial district sooner or later for the best interests of the Town because r II they get more out of it. The stores in the Manor Crescent are not suitable for bunisess and could not be rented for business. One was made "` into a lunch room and the other was an office. Mr. Richards got these stores without a hearing `: from the people. 1'.. 41 Mr. Edward W. Ormond: - 10 North Hancock Street . In in the grocery lw business on North Hancock Street. Has been in F`,: business in Lexington twenty years. Thinks there h„; is no more demand for any kind of stores at this . place. Is opposed because he thinks there is enough business there . People have tried tea- rooms there several times. At present there is e4, a gasoline station, First National Store, a 4, periodical ship and his grocery store. The periodical shop was a drug store but couldn't make it pay. There is always a gang hanging around the gasoline station. Mr. Thomas Kelly: - Bought his property thirteen years ago and ?fi` • did not hear about a coal yard at the time. ,., Stated that if Smith's corner is not changed, ,4 _ the other corners should not be changed. Has `' talked with Mr. Parks and Mr. Dempsey and neither ”, II one wanted to appear for or against the change.. , Mr. Brady:- Thinks it ought to be changed into a business district because of the coal yard and gas station already there. Thinks lower end of Bedford Street 7 should be put into the business zone anyway. i *;e w._ 71 III y% Mr. Ormond - Stated that Mr. Brady could have lower end of Bedford Street put into business zone. lir Mr. J. J. Brady:- Asked Mr. Emery to consider putting the y lower end of Bedford Street from the Railroad up 80 feet and from DixlsOline up into the business zone anyway. Would like whole frontage if possible but if not possible, would like 80 feet out of 310 feet. Would be used for tea- room. Mr. Ormond and Mr. Meade - opposed Mr. Kelly and Mr. Brady - in favor hp .11 S'. 'y V" o Yf' 3