HomeMy WebLinkAbout1948-08-16473
SELECTMEN'S MEETING
August 16, 1948
A regular meeting of the Board of Selectmen.
was held in the.Selectmen's Room on Monday evening,
August 16, 1948, at 7:30 p.m. There were present:
Chairman Paxton, Messrs. Emery, Gay, Driscoll and
Nickerson. The Clerk was also present.
A letter was received from Mr. Chapin, Veteran's Transfer
Agent, informing the Board that the anticipated to Vet's
expenses for his Department for the month of August Ben. Acc't.,
totalling $259 will leave a balance of $11.96.
Mr. Finery moved that the Appropriation Committee
be requested to transfer the sum of $500 from the
Reserve Fund to the Veteran's Benefit Account.
Mr. Driscoll seconded the motion, and it was so
voted.
Mr. Walker, Town Accountant, met with the
Board and discussed at length finances of the town
giving a comparison of the balance sheet with the
period ending July 31, 1947 and the period ending
July 31, 1948. Mr. Walker called the Board's
attention to the fact that if the Town is to take
advantage of money available under Chapter 645 for
building the elementary school, application must be
made before September 18th. Mr. Gay moved that
application be made by the Chairman of the Board of
Selectmen. Mr. Emery seconded the motion, and it
was so voted. Mr. Walker retired at 8:25 p.m.
Mr. Lynch, Town Counsel, and Mr. DeFoe, Supt.
of Public Works, met with the Board to discuss gen-
erally betterment assessments. Mr. Emery asked
whether or not it is legal to make a different
assessment per foot for different parcels, the abutters
beim on the same street. Mr. Lynch replied in the
negative. He said that it must be figured at the same
rate for every one on the street. The Chairman said
that from a practical point of view it should be, but
from a legal point of view it did not have to be.
Mr. Lynch explained that the Board is obligated to
assess betterments. The total cost is first determined
which includes street drainage and everything. The
Betterment
Assessment
474
total cost shotild then be apportioned among the
assessable lots on a pro rata basis. He stated
that then the important thing is determined,
which the Statute states, in no event shall the
amount of the betterment assessments be in excess
of the advantage or benefit to a particular lot of
land. He said that first the Board must analyze
the benefit to each lot and determine whether or
not, in the opinion of the Board, the property has
been benefited to the number of dollars determined.
He explained that the assessment cannot be more
than the estimate filed at the Registry.
The owner of the property can petition for an
abatement of the assessment. The Board must then
again determine if the amount of the assessment is
in excess of the benefit or advantage and an abate-
ment can be made. If the Board refuses to abate,
the owner can then go to Court. Mr. Nickerson asked
if the Board abated one assessment must the others
be abated. Mr. Lynch replied in the negative and
stated that the Board analyzes one particular
property and ignores the remaining property during
the analysis. He said that the Board does not have
to concern itself with the rest of the land on the
street. The Chairman asked if the Board had to take
the total cost into consideration and Mr. Lynch
replied in the affirmative. The Chairman said that
from a practical point of view it would seem that
all of the properties would have the same rate
unless there is something particularly different
about any one lot. The Chairman stated that Cherry
Street, Taft Avenue, Cary Avenue and Sutherland
Road were all done at one time and the chances are
that these should be considered as one group. If
there is no -charge for the drainage, he determined
an average assessment per front foot of assessable
property of $3.29. He stated that on Pine Knoll
Road he figured an assess*ble cost of $3.61; on
Brookside Street an assess*ble cost of $3.37; and on
Spencer and Joseph Roads an assessable cost of $3.70.
Mr. Emery asked if it were all right to leave out
the corners. Mr. Lynch replied that he thought it
was all right to leave out the corners but he dis-
agreed with the approach. He said he did not believe
the Board could leave out as a rule of thumb the
drainage cost. He said that the Board could determine
that the benefit to a particular piece of property
is so many dollars and if it happens to coincide with
the drainage it is all right. The Chairman stated
1
that the Board has not decided on anything yet.
Mr. Lynch said that if the Board eliminated the
drainage and it is ever questioned by Town Meet-
ing it might prove embarrassing. He said the Board
should determine the total cost, and then when the
Board comes to assessing determine the betterments
to each piece of property.
Mr. DeFoe said that Mr. Milton F. Shaw of
Grant Street was waiting outside and would like
to meet with the Board. Mr. Lynch presented the
Board with a plan showing Grant Street as a 50' street
at the time that Shaw purchased his property. Mr.
Lynch said that in order to get ready for the street
they dug out the ledge staying on town property.
At no time did they go on Shaw's property except
one time they left a steep bank. This was levelled
off. On Shaw's property the c esspoolwas then close
to Grant Street. The Town Engineer started to put
in a new cesspool. Mr. Shaw called Mr. Lynch and
Mr. Burns also called Mr. Lynch. He said that he
took a look at it and even though the town has not
taken any of his land the town has no right to go in
and damage the land. It is damaged by lack of
support. He said that Mr. Shaw is not entitled to
anything better than he had before but he is
entitled to something for damage to his land. Mr.
Lynch said that Mr. Burns stated that by cutting
into the bank to reduce the sharpness of the drop,
replacing his steps and sodding, he will have a sit-
uation the same as he had before. Mr. Lynch said
that he does not think the town should do anything
on this land or Mr. Fuller's land until the Town
has a definite agreement. Mr. Lynch said that even
though Mr. Shaw was present at the meeting of the
Board at the time Grant Street was discussed, and
acquiesced, no agreement was entered into.
Mr. Shaw met with the Board at 9:30 p.m.
He said that he wanted to find out what the story
is on Grant Street. The Chairman explained that
the Board appreciates his position but unforunately
there is no money for wells and that is all there is
to it. It was not figured in the appropriation and
there are no funds with which to build a wall. He
explained that the engineer and Mr. DeFoe has been
wicking on a plan on this and he believes they can
work out something so that the slope will not be much
475
Mr. Lynch
re:
Grant St.
476
greater than it was previously. He said that if
the town raises the back edge of the sidewalk from
two feet above the center grade line of the street
he thought they could have a slope fairly close
to three to one. He said he thought this would
work out well for Mr. Shaw and that the sidewalk
would be considerably higher than it would be on the
other side. Mr. Shaw stated that they laid it out
and he looked at it. He said there is no place to
park his car off the road. The Chairman said this
is a disadvantage everyone has because we are not
supposed to park cars on the road. They should be
in the driveway. The Chairman said that in the
winter time particularly the town doesn't want cars
parked in the street. Mr. Shaw said that he is in
a position where he just can't seem to do business
with the Board of Appeals. The Chairman explained
that the Selectmen have no jurisdiction over the
Board of Appeals. The Chairman •explained that as
far as the town is concerned in connection with all
betterment streets they do arrange the ramp going
into private driveways and if Mr. Shaw will let the
Public Works Department know where he wants it they
will fix it so that he will have a ramp where he
wants the driveway. Mr. Shaw replied that he can't
put in a driveway without excavating. The Chair-
man explained that the dtiveway was Mr. Shaw's
problem and not one for the town. Mr. Shaw said he
thinks the main issue is the property being left
in good shape, and he does not believe it is. The
Chairman said that the Board does not know because
the job is not finished yet. Mr. Shaw said that he
could visualize it. He said that to his way of
thinking any sort of slope is difficult to maintain;
apt to wash and hard to mow. Mr. Gay asked if he
were looking at this from the new plan or the way
it is now and Mr. Shaw replied, "Either way."
The Chairman said that he thought Mr. Shaw did
not understand how the excavating would be done and
what the finished dhoulder would look like. The
Chairman said that according to the plan which he
believes was drawn up recently, leaving the side-
walk at the original design, it is only about six
feet lower than the original grade at the right of
way line. They went back 12' to get a one and one-
half slope. Mr. Shaw replied that even so it is a
considerable drop and will leave a 6' bank.
1
477
The Chairman again stated that :there are no funds
for a wall. Mr. Shaw said that he thought the money
could be obtained. :He 'stated that the whole street
is being put in by the town at the request of the
people living on Grant Street. A certain minimum
job has to be done and they are all paying for it.
He said that he maintains that to do the job in style
as the rest of the job is being done, they will have
to put in walls. The Chairman explained that Mr.
Shaw was told at the meeting that the estimate was
not based on wall construction. Mr. Shaw replied
that that hearing was all very preliminary and there
were no figures as to how far back the town was going
on a person's land. He said that he spoke to Mr. Lynch
not long ago and he was under the impression that there
was no 10' grade possible there. Mr. Shaw said that
he had no way of telling what the elevation was. He
said that if the chairman cites that meeting as a
place where this was talked over it was only preliminary.
He said that at that time it was not decided what was
to be done about the Richard's house. The Chairman
explained that the Board knew that the Richard's
property'had to be disposed of one way or another.
Whether it was torn down or removed was incidental.
It was more economical, however, to tear it down than
to move it. He said that the Board knew the road was
going where the Richard's house was located. The
Board also knew that there was ledge there. He explained
that every one was told that all slopes would be on
private property. He said the Board recognized that
the situation is unusual but there is absolutely no
money in the appropriation to construct stonewalls. He
said that the town would like to have the grade of the
sidewalk where it belongs but there has to be sacrifices
both ways. He said the only thing to do is to raise
it up and make it as easy a slope as possible. It will
be greater than the slope originally. He stated that
he does not believe that the depression will be near
what Mr. Shaw thinks it will be. The Chairman ex-
plained that the town has not, over a period of years,
put in stonewalls on betterment streets except when
we have ERA and so forth. Mr. Shaw replied that the
fact that it hes never been done should not carry much
weight. He said that he thinks that this is a unique
situation and the Board can't look back on the past.
1
478
The Chairman said that he could point out a steeper
slope and mentioned Farmcrest Avenue and Kendall Road.
He said it was sloped at a one and one-half and
one slope and there was a house on the property. Mr.
Shaw asked what the owner did. The Chairman explained
that the owner wanted the street so he took the slope.
He said that there Is no money for the wall and he
thought that Mr. Shaw should try to realize that the
Board will do everything it can to ease the problem
without the construction of the wall. Mr. Shaw asked
what was to prevent the Board of Selectmen from pro-
posing at the Town Meeting that this be re -opened.
The Chairman said that the Selectmen do not have to
open it at the Town Meeting. It is up to the Board
of Selectmen to determine the assessments and that
the assessments have already been filed at the
Registry. Mr. Shaw asked if they could be changed
by law. Mr. Lynch replied that they cannot be
changed. The Chairman said that some conclusion
would have to be arrived at because the contractor
is ready to move the shovel out. if no agreement
can be reached it then becomesa matter for the
court to determine whether or not Mr. Shaw gets
a wall. He said that Mr. Shaw could say that all
right, perhaps this slope would not be so bad and
give the town a release to go in and do the job.
The Chairman said that if he did he could rest
assured that the public Works Department will make
every effort to see that the grass grows or they
will sod the slope. Mr. Shaw asked where the money
for the sod was coming from. The Chairman said that
the town had the sod. Mr. Shaw questioned how the
labor would be paid for putting in the sod and the
Chairman said that the labor for putting in the sod
can't be compared with what it would cost to con-
struct a wall. Mr. Shaw asked if the total appro-
priation had been taken care of and the Chairman
replied in the negative but stated that it will be
by the time the work is completed, and that there
is a greater amount of ledge encountered on Grant
Street than was anticipated. Mr. Shaw said that
he is not asking that the grade be left just as it
was before. He said he had a slight grade before
and would like to see a partial wall with about
a four to one slope, and it would take a 51 to 6'
wall. The Chairman said that a partial wall could
cost between $4,000 and $5,000. Mr. Shaw said he
would like to know what the decision of the Board
is and the Chairman said that the decision is with
1
479
Mr. Shaw. He can give the town permission to
go in and raise the grade to 3' above the gutter
line; then to slope on his property and to see that
grass grows on it. The Chairman explained that is
one choice Mr. Shaw has. The other choice is not
to permit the town to do it. It will just go along
and be left in the rough condition. There would
then probably have to be a court decision. Mr.
Shaw said that if that is the way it is he does
not want to see a court decision.
Mr. Shaw said he thought the thing to do is
just to leave it in the Board's hands. The Chair-
man said, as he understood it, Mr. Shaw wanted to
leave it up to the Board, and that the Board will
make every effort to minimize the slope and sod it.
Mr. Shaw replied that he thought he should have a
wall and that is what he is going to try and get.
He also said he would like cesspools filled over.
The Chairman said that he had hoped an agreement
could be reached on the slope but now Mr. Shaw
says he is not going to be satisfied with any-
thing but a wall. Mr. Shaw said that was correct.
The Chairman addressed the Supt. of Public Works
and said that if he had started to dig a cesspool,
to fill it in and continue to construct the street.
Mr. Shaw said that he thought he should have some
steps. The Chairman said that nothing could be
done on that and there will be no action brought
at the next town meeting. Mr. Shaw said he thought
it is only fair that he should be able to get in
and out of the street in some decent fashion. Mr.
Gay asked whose responsibility the steps are. Mr.
Lynch replied that the steps are Mr. Shaw's respon-
sibility and that they were on town property.
Mr. Shaw said that he did not put the steps there;
that Mr. Callahan, who built the house, put them
there. The Chairman said the Board will do the best
it can under the situation but Mr. Shaw leaves the
Board in a difficult position. He stated that the
Board told Mr. Shaw very definitely the day of the
hearing that there was no money provided for walls.
He said that Mr. Shaw must recall that on Grant
Street the Board of Selectmen were recommending
indefinite postponement, but that Mr. Shaw went
to Town Meeting and presented the issue. The
Chairman asked Mr. Shaw to retire for a few minutes.
He left the meeting at 10:20 p.m.
480
Mr. Nickerson asked about the possiblility of
a slide taking place and someone being injured.
Mr. Lynch said that the Town is not responsible
for Mr. Shaw's land. If the slide is out on the
street the town would be responsible and the town
has an obligation to keep the street and side-
walk safe. Mr. Nickerson asked if the town could
slope toward the back to a 21 cut and Mr. Lynch
replied that the town would be trespassing and
has no right there. Mr. Nickerson said that he
meant on the sidewalk area. The Chairman said that
is what he has been trying to work out. Mr. Nick-
erson said that if the place is going to be left
the way it is, it should be left so that there is
as little danger as possible. Mr. Emery asked if
the town put in the steps, would it hurt or help.
the town's position. Mr. Lynch said it would hurt
the town's position. The steps were on town
property originally. Mr. Lynch said he would go
this far; - if Mr. Shaw would give the town an ease-
ment to go on to his land, the town would slope it
and put in steps comparable to the steps that were
there. But if the town can afford the land,
adequate lateral support that is all the town
is obligated to do. Mr. Lynch recommended that
the Chairman ask Mr. Shaw definitely if he has had
legal advice on this matter and if he replied in
the negative tell him in view of the information
the Board has, which the Town Counsel is not free
to divulge, that it would be advisable for him to
see an attorney. Mr. Shaw returned to the meeting
at 10:35 p.m.
The Chairman told Mr. Shaw that he did not
have to answer the next question if he did not want
to and proceeded to ask him if he has consulted an
attorney. Mr. Shaw replied in the negative. The
Chairman said tat the Board wanted to advise Mr.
Shaw to consult an attorney because the Board wants
him to be thoroughly familiar with his rights in
this matter. The Board does not want him to feel
that the Board is consulting an attorney and he
has not had that advantage. The Chairman asked
if in thinking this over in the period of time
Mr. Shaw was out of the meeting he was still of the
same opinion, that he is not going to be satisfied
with any thing else other than a wall. Mr. Shaw
said that was correct. The Chairman said that if
Mr. Shaw would give the town a slope easement that
will not in any way grant the town a release but
1.4
1
481
but it will just be a slope easement for the
purpose of going in and sloping. The easement
would be written by the Town Counsel and should
be checked by Mr. Shawls counsel. The Chairman
explained that the Board is gambling on this to the
extent that the members of the Board feel that if
Mr. Shaw will give the Board a permit to slope,
without affecting his rights, that he will be satisfied
enough so that he will not want to go any further.
The Chairman said that if the Town Counsel draws up
a slope easement', the Board would very definitely
like Mr. Shaw to have it checked with a lawyer. He
explained that if. Mr. Shaw does not want to give a
slope easement the town will have to leave it in its
present condition. Mr. Shaw said that he thought the
thing for him to do was to engage counsel and see
what he will say. He said that if he has no right
in the matter his counsel will put him right. He
stated the thing to do is to actually engage counsel
and see whet he has to say about it. Mr. Shaw said
that as far as going on the property, the town has
already gone on the property fifteen feet and want-
ed to know why they didntt continue. Mr. Lynch
said that he would prefer to have Mr. Shaw see his
attorney. Mr. Shaw asked why he should sign a
release. Mr. Nickerson explained that it would not
be a release but just a slope easement to do the work.
Mr. Lynch suggested that Mr. Shawls attorney contact
him. He said he would prefer not to discuss it with
Mr. Shaw because he does not want him to feel that
the Town is taking advantage of him and that if
he will have his attorney call him he will be very
glad to discuss the matter. In the meantime he
suggests that the town not go in even to fill in
the cesspool. If this can be worked out with Mr.
Shawls attorney in the next few days, the town will
move in immediately. He said that if Mr. Shaw will
talk with his attorney and is told of the legal
problems involved, he will understand the situation
better. Mr. Shaw retired at 10:45 p.m.
Mr. Lynch asked if he had the authority of the
Board of Selectmen to negotiate with an attorney as
indicated. Mr. Emery moved that Mr. Lynch be
authorized to negotiate with Mr. Shawls attorney.
Mr. Driscoll seconded the motion, and it was so voted.
Mr. Lynch retired at 10:55 p.m.
482
Bids for
Salt
Mr. DeFoe requested permission to purchase salt
and presented bids. Upon the motion of Mr. Gay,
seconded by Mr. Driscoll, it was voted to authorize
the Suptt. of Public Works to place an order with
the International Salt Company for 120 tons at
their quotation of $11.40 per ton.
Mr. DeFoe presented samples of namesletter by
Wrico. Mr. Gay moved that the Engineering Department
Wrico the names of veterans to be placed on the
Honor present honor roll in front of Cary Memorial Building.
Roll Mr. Nickerson seconded the motion, and it was so voted.
Mr. DeFoe informed the Board that he had analyzed
the low bids received for the construction of water
main in North and Burlington Streets, Dingley Con-
tracting Company being the low bidder. He said that
he did not know anything about this concern and called
Metcalf & Eddy who recommended favorably. Mr. Emery
moved to award the contract for constructing water
mains in North and Burlington Streets to Dingley
Contracting Co. of Natick, the low bidder, who sub-
mitted a price of $7,865. Mr. Nickerson seconded
the motion, and it was so voted.
Award
contract
Mr. DeFoe informed the Board that Mr. Cataldo had
written a letter some time ago requesting to have the
Cataldo sewer assessments levied against him delayed. The
Sewer assessment amounts to $518.40. Mr. DeFoe presented
Assess- a sketch showing the section in question. He stated
went that the land is low farm land. The Chairman suggested
that Mr. DeFoe have the necessary agreements pre-
pared by Mr. Lynch for the Board's signature.
Mr. DeFoe said that he had received requests for
abatements for sewer assessments levied against four
lots on Spencer Street. He presented a plan show-
ing the properties and the Chairman explained the
situation to the Board. The Assessments were filed
against the abutters in error and as a resa.lt they
were assessed although there was no construction.
Mr. Emery moved that the Supt. of Public Works be
authorized to prepare the necessary forms for abate-
ment of sewer assessments levied against Lots E,
part of F, C and D on Spencer Street. Mr. Driscoll
seconded the motion, andit was so voted.
Spencer
Street
Abatements
Mr. Gay inquired about renting equipment on
Richards and Robbins Road. Mr. Emery wanted to know
if the equipment could be rented with the understanding
that the abutter hire the operator. Mr. Driscoll said
that he was opposed to renting of town equipment and
brought the question up as to what would happen if
the operator were injured. The Clerk was instructed
to advise Mr. Ross, who originally petitioned for town
equipment, that no change has been made in the vote
passed by the Board whereby no town equipment shall be
rented for use on private property, private ways or un-
accepted streets. The Chairman said that he wished to
be recorded as being in favor of renting town equipment.
A petition was received from W. John Baskin,
Homer W. Bartram and J. Calvin Bartlett requesting the
installation of a water main on Henderson Road.
Mr. DeFoe said that Mr. Baskin had advised him that he
is not going through with Williams Road and if that is
so it may be possible to install the water in Henderson
Road. Mr. DeFoe retired at 11:25 p.m.
483.
Renting
of town
equipment
Water re-
quest for
Henderson
Road
The Chairman read a letter from John T. Black-
well relative to the application received from the Lovell
Bus Lines for a license to operate on Access Road.
Mr. Blackwell informed the Board that from the information
he has received it would seem to him that the Board would
be justified in granting the license. Mr. Emery moved
that the Lovell Bus Lines be granted a license to operate
motor vehicles for hire over the following described
route:
"Over portions of the State owned highway
leading to the Bedford Airport, known as
Access'Road, located in the Town of Lex-
ington, in either direction.
Mr. Nickerson seconded the motion, and it was so voted.
Upon motion of Mr. Emery, seconded by Mr. Driscoll,
it was voted to grant the following licenses:
Edward Watson 65 Reed Street
Clifford F. Flack 41 Outlook Drive
William Viano 1794 Mass. Avenue
Countryside Associates Lowell Street
Public Carriage
Peddler (renewal)
Sunday Movies
Sunday Golf
A decision relative to granting a public carriage
license to -Edward Watson was held over from the last
meeting. A satisfactory character reference was re-
ceived from the Police Department. Mr. Nickerson
moved that the license pe granted subject to Mr. Watson's
Bus permil
to
operate
over
Access
Road
Public
Carriage
License
484
Apptt. to
Board
of
Appeals
Election
Workers
advising the clerk as to the location from which his
business will be conducted and the number of cabs
he expects to have. Mr. Gay seconded the motion,
and it was so voted.
The Chairman reported that he had talked with
Mr. Locke who suggested the possibility of appoint-
ing a member from the Board of Selectmen to serve on
the Board of Appeals to fill the unexpired term
caused by the death of J. Milton Brown. Mr. Emery
moved that Thomas G. Lynch be appointed a member
of the Board of Appeals to fill the unexpired
term caused by the death of J. Milton Brown. Mr.
Nickerson seconded the motion, and it was so voted.
The Clerk informed the Board that it would be
necessary to appoint additional election workers
inasmuch as some of the individuals appointed on
July 26th had declined. It was decided to make
the following appointments:
Precinct 3 Mrs. Elizabeth McCormack Teller
Mrs. Gerald Turner (Alternate)
Precinct 4 Harry Boyd
Roy Johnson
Harry F. Howard
Thomas Napoli
Leon A. Burke (Alternate)
Frank Tobin (Alternate)
Inspector
Teller.
Deputy Warden .
Deputy Inspector
The Chairman said that the Board should set a
date for the Special Town Meeting and also a date
for closing the warrant. It was decided to close
the warrant on September 20th and to hold the Town
Meeting on October 18th providing this date xdeets
with the approval of the Moderator, Mr. Holt.
The meeting adjourned at 12:05 p.m.
A true record, Attest:
le , electmen.
1