Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-04-05-TSC-min-worthen.pdf cili 11 ii �= _,,t,'t`$ Trrftrn of rxingtun, ttssttrl�uzcft '4,_$,-,MEMORANDUM 4c.. Zd ,� TO: James F. Crain, Chairman DATE: 4/5/83 PAGE: 1 Board of Selectmen FROM: Peter M. Chalpin, Chairm-, SUBJECT: Request for Traffic Safety Committe- v . Crosswalk - Worthen Road Madelyn Simmons , s /1 le , (1 .", At its meeting of March 30 , 1983 the Traffic Safety Committee met with Madelyn Simmons to discuss her request for a crosswalk on Worthen Road at the Shawmut Bank. Ms. Simmons indicated that residents of Greeley Village do their shopping at the Stop and Shop and that nearly all walk to and from the store. Their route takes them behind the Medi Mart, and they generally cross Worthen Road at mid-block, near the Shawmut Bank. This route is being used because it is shorter than using Bedford Street to the cross signals at Worthen Road, and because traffic in and out of the Shell station driveways is a concern to them. The Committee explained to Ms. Simmons that we were opposed to installing a mid-block crosswalk on Worthen Road, particularly one which would be used primarily by senior citizens, because of the traffic volumes and patterns in the area. Beyond this, we explained that the presence of such a crosswalk did not provide a physical barrier and would not assure Greeley Village residents of safety when crossing. We agree that they must walk an additional distance to use the pedestrian signals and that the gas station driveways may at times be confusing. Nonetheless, we must recommend this as the route they use. The pedestrian signals at Bedford Street were originally installed for the benefit of Greeley Village residents, and the State had to be convinced that they were warranted for these people because the overall required mini- mum pedestrian volumes did not, and do not now, exist. (See enclosed letter dated 11/28/75) It is our recommendation therefore that the request be denied. While no street crossing, including a signalized one, guarantees pedestrian safety, we believe the chance of a pedestrian being struck at the signals at Bedford Street is far less than at the mid-block location. In addition, we are very concerned that the Greeley residents continue daily to cross Worthen Road at the Shawmut Bank. They do not appreciate the chance they are taking. With this in mind and in keeping with Capt. Lima' s offer to Ms. Simmons to have the Safety Officer address the residents, we wish to include a visit by the Safety Officer as an additional recommendation. INR , , ) ,, \ \ F-TM-t MP-2M Triton of `Uexin$tnn, cfilinsonr4usetto MEMORANDUM TO: James F. Crain DATE: 4/5/83 PAGE: 2 FROM: Peter M. Chalpin SUBJECT: Crosswalk Worthen Road Finally, the Bedford Street pedestrian signals were timed for a walking speed of 3. 33 feet per second to accommodate the elderly. The national average is 4 feet per second. Currently, 15 seconds are provided in the Walk/Don' t Walk phase. Ex- tending this phase to 20 seconds may be desirable. Twenty seconds is based on a walking speed of 2 .5 feet per second, and this additional time should not cause undo traffic delays. This would require amending the State permit for the signals. Those in attendance: Peter M. Chalpin Capt. James J. Lima Mr. Donald Graham Dr. Eric T. Clarke pmc/w enclosure cc: Traffic Safety Committee Robert M. Hutchinson, Town Manager Walter J. Tonaszuck, Director of P .W./Eng. f-TM-1 MP-2M