Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-06-09 SB-minSELECT BOARD MEETING Monday, June 9, 2025 A meeting of the Lexington Select Board was called to order at 6:30p.m. on Monday, June 9, 2025, via a hybrid meeting platform. Mr. Lucente, Chair; Mr. Pato, Ms. Hai, Mr. Sandeen, and Ms. Kumar, were present, as well as Mr. Bartha, Town Manager; Ms. Axtell, Deputy Town Manager; and Ms. Katzenback, Executive Clerk. Chair Lucente called the meeting to order at 6:30p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS Jim Williams, 8 Stratham Road, expressed concern about lack of public participation to date in the Article 97 process and asked the Town Manager to immediately open the EEA portal for the high school building project. SELECT BOARD MEMBER CONCERNS AND LIAISON REPORTS 1. Select Board Member Announcements and Liaison Reports Mr. Lucente stated that he and Ms. Kumar attended the LHS graduation on June 1st. There were 583 Lexington High School graduates, and stated Ms. Kumar did an amazing job providing the remarks on behalf of the Board. Ms. Hai stated that this Friday is the Massachusetts Municipal Associations’ Select Board training day from 8:30am-330pm in Devons. TOWN MANAGER REPORT 1. Town Manager Weekly Update Mr. Bartha stated that he attended the ICMA board meeting this past weekend in Minneapolis and learned during that they will also be hosting some events this year to celebrate America's 250th. He noted that Lexington would be happy to share its ideas. He stated that Joanne Belanger retired earlier this spring and the applicant portal for that position closed last Friday with a strong response. The Town is also in the middle of interviewing for the DPW Ops Director and the Communications Director positions. Mr. Bartha stated that this is Wellness Week for Town employees. CONSENT AGENDA Consent Agenda Item #9 was held for further discussion. 1. Accept: Select Board Committee Resignation Lexington Bicycle Advisory Committee - Ramprasad V . Reddy To accept the resignation of Ramprasad V Reddy from the Lexington Bicycle Advisory Committee effective June 09, 2025. DOCUMENTS: 2025.05.20 Ram Reddy - Lexington Bicyle Advisory Committee_Redacted 2. Approve: Dissolution of Town Manager Search Screening Committee To dissolve the Town Manager Search Screening Committee. 3. Approve: Select Board Minutes To approve and release the following minutes: May 12, 2025 Select Board May 19, 2025 Select Board May 29, 2025 Select Board DOCUMENTS: DRAFT 05122025 Select Board minutes, DRAFT 05192025 Select Board minutes, DRAFT 05292025 Select Board minutes 4. Approve: Fiscal Year 2026 Cost-Of-Living Adjustment (COLA) for Non-Represented Employees To approve the Fiscal Year 2026 Cost-Of-Living Adjustment (COLA) for Non-Represented Employees as presented. DOCUMENTS: FY 2026 COLA for Non-Represented Employees 5. Approve: Request for Water and Sewer Deferral To approve deferral of the FY2025 water and sewer payments for136 Maple Street. DOCUMENTS: Deferral -136 Maple Street 6. Approve: Water and Sewer Commitments To approve: Water & Sewer Commitment Section 3 $ 4,251,492.62 Water & Sewer Commitment Cycle 9 March 2025 $ 320,007.37 DOCUMENTS: SB Meeting Commitments Water-Sewer 7. Approve: Chamber of Commerce Request to Place Sign at Emery Park Announcing the Free Community Summer Concert Series To approve the Lexington Chamber of Commerce request to place a 36-inch by 72-inch wooden sandwich board sign on the lawn at Emery Park, Depot Square from June 13 through August 23, 2025, as proposed. DOCUMENTS: Chamber of Commerce request to place sign, 2025 Summer Concert Series Sandwich Board 8. Approve: One-Day Liquor License – Wilson Farm, 10 Pleasant Street Dinner in the Field – Thursday, June 26, 2025 To approve a One-Day Liquor License for Wilson Farm to serve beer and wine for the purpose of their ‘Dinner in the Field’ event to be held at Wilson Farm, 10 Pleasant Street, outside of farm greenhouse #7, on Thursday, June 26, 2025 from 5:30pm to 9:30pm. DOCUMENTS: Dinner in Field MAP VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve Consent Agenda items 1-8. CONSENT AGENDA 9. Approve: License for Public Entertainment on Sunday – Fiesta Shows, Hastings Park 69th Annual Fourth of July Carnival Mr. Lucente recused himself from this item. To approve a License for Public Entertainment on Sunday for Fiesta Shows for the purpose of providing amusement rides and games for patrons of the 69th Annual Fourth of July Carnival to take place on Sunday, July 6, 2025 at Hastings Park, 0 Massachusetts Avenue, from 1:00pm to 8:00pm. VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, the Select Board voted 4-0 to approve Consent Agenda item 9. ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION 1.HEARING: Noise Bylaw Permit – Mural Project at 135 Massachusetts Avenue Mr. Lucente explained that the Economic Development Department is requesting approval of a Noise Bylaw Special Permit to allow evening work to be performed at the rear of 135 Massachusetts Avenue for the East Lexington Mural Project, outside of the allowable hours under the Noise Bylaw. Work would start on Tuesday, June 24, 2025, through Friday, June 27, for approximately three nights from 9:00 p.m.- 11:00 p.m. While the artists believe that the work can be accomplished in three nights, four nights are being requested in the event that rain causes a delay. The hearing notice was mailed to abutters and was also posted to the Town Website Legal Notice page. Jay Abdella, Senior Economic Development Coordinator, explained that a noise consultant reviewed the proposed area to be impacted and determined that the boom lift, in conjunction with a white noise alarm to disperse the backup alarm, would result in levels that are approximately 50-60 decibels, which is similar to the average car driving through Mass Ave. As requested by the Board, letters were sent out to all abutters asking for feedback and opinions. An open session with the artists was also held for those interested. VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve a Noise Bylaw Special Permit for evening work to be conducted from 9:00pm to 11:00pm to take place between June 24, 2025 – June 27, 2025 for work related to the East Lexington Mural Project. DOCUMENTS: Request Memo For Select Board Special Permit 2. Discussion: Diversity Equity & Inclusion Staffing Update The Board received a presentation from staff on plans to expand staffing resources dedicated to DEI based on feedback received from employees, local stakeholders, and subject area experts. It was explained that the request is for an Assistant HR Director position, which would also function as an Internal Equity Officer. Another request is for a new external position, a Clinical Engagement and Community Equity Officer. The Board suggested internal and external goals, a way to track progress, and additional data reporting. Mr. Sandeen suggested that one of the main aspects of equity from a community perspective is housing. He requested that the housing be a key priority of the externally focused goals for this position. Mr. Bartha agreed that these things would be considered and worked on. Deborah Strod, 10 Thoreau Road, stated that she appreciated the investment in the research and outreach, and the involvement and empowerment of multiple staff. She also appreciated the embodiment in teams and teamwork, with senior leadership involved and accountable. She agreed that efforts on both external and internal work are needed, and that they require different types of resources and coordination with the community. Stephanie Hsu, 9 Locke Lane, emphasized the importance of making sure that Human Services is fully staffed throughout this process, and that their resources are not depleted in the process of working through these goals. Wendy Manz, 3 Captain Parker Arms, thanked Mr. Sandeen for invoking the issue of housing in the context of DEI. She urged the Board to look at specific, tangible items that make a difference, as opposed to organization structure only, and housing is one of those things. Melinda Walker, 14 Larchmont Ln, stated that the applauds these efforts. She stated that work that can be done in terms of respecting people who work in the Town, but who do not live in the Town. DOCUMENTS: DEI 2.0 Memo w/ attachment, DEI 2.0 PPT Cover Mem 3. Approve: Parklet Location on Massachusetts Avenue Sandhya Iyer, Economic Development Director, explained that, for the last several years, the Town has placed a parklet on the Southwest side of Massachusetts Avenue due to the narrow sidewalks. This year, with unanimous approval from the Lexington Center Committee, the Economic Development Department recommends the placement of the Parklet be located in the three parking spaces in front of 1718 Massachusetts Avenue. There is support from MiniLuxe, Galaray House, and Marathon Sports. Police and Public Works have also indicated their support for the location. A walk through with Economic Development and Public Works occurred on June 3, 2025. Kerry Brandin, 16 Franklin Rd, suggested a parklet on Waltham Street. There is an indent on the sidewalk which could be utilized, and this would be a welcomed item in this area. Dawn McKenna, 9 Hancock St, stated that there is a tremendous amount of traffic along the bikeway and the more parklets installed, the better. She noted that these parklets came about during the year that the Tourism Committee decided to start Revolutionary Revelry. At the time, there was no place for bicycles to park. She spoke with Mr. Michaelson, who was opposed to taking a space out of the Center, but she convinced him that 20 bicycles could fit in that space. At the end of the six-week period, he agreed to leave it up all summer. Jay Luker, 26 Rindge Ave, asked when the Town will move beyond parklets and try to widen the sidewalk in this area. The public space that these parking spaces take up is extremely valuable and there are other amenities and benefits which they could be used for. If the parking spaces are so important, they should be charged more for. VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, the Select Board voted 5-0 to authorize the installation of the Massachusetts Avenue Parklet starting the week of June 16, 2025, through the end of October 2025, in three parking spaces in front of 1718 Massachusetts Avenue. DOCUMENTS: Parklet 2025 Location Details, MiniLux e Parkelt Support Letter, Galaray House Support Letter, Nouve - Support Letter, Marathon Sports - Support Letter, Artinian Jewelry letter of concern, Btone Support Letter Backup Material 4. Discussion: Battle Green Use Policy Mr. Lucente stated that, at the request of the Police Department, the Select Board is asked to consider potential amendments to the Use of the Battle Green regulation to clarify the physical boundaries of the Battle Green and to address permitted use of the pedestrian island directly in front of the Captain Parker Statue. In response to growing public safety concerns and the need to ensure unobstructed ADA access in this constrained and historically significant location, the Police Department has recommended that this area be formally recognized as distinct from the main Battle Green and subject to Select Board review for any proposed assembly or demonstration. The intent is to discourage such activity in this space and reinforce the importance of permitting and oversight in sensitive areas. He noted that the Board heard from 17 residents ahead of the meeting. Captain John Mazerall, Police Department, stated that the concern is public safety. The local groups seen in this area have been very peaceful but there could be an issue if opposing groups meet each other in this small space. Town Counsel Mina Makarious stated that the Board’s intent is not to limit speech. He confirmed this area cannot be closed off entirely for free speech, similar to the Battle Green. Mr. Pato stated that he believes it is essential to preserve the ability for people to express themselves freely in a time and place that is appropriate. The Battle Green area is an appropriate place, though he recognizes the need to preserve safety issues. He is having trouble understanding the difference between the apron area and the sidewalks in the Center. The Town should aid a group to make sure they are not impeding safe travel. This location is not necessarily one that should be treated differently than anywhere else. He is uncomfortable with changing to a permitting process, as it does not seem consistent with the types of expression that he commonly sees in this area. He asked if there are other ways to accomplish the safety goal without compromising the ability for spontaneous engagement. Captain Mazerall stated that there is an ability for the Police to legally move people across the street if things get out of hand. However, it is difficult to determine where that line is. Ms. Hai stated that no one on the Board wants to limit free speech. The Police are very responsive if safety becomes an issue. She would not like to see this proposed amendment move forward as written. Ms. Kumar stated that she is uncomfortable with placing restrictions as drafted. She does believe that there needs to be a balance between the safety needs and not taking away use of the Captain Parker statue for public demonstrations. Mr. Sandeen stated that Lexington, being the birthplace of American liberty, should not be or be perceived as making it harder for residents to exercise their First Amendment freedoms, one of which is the right of the people to peaceably assemble. He stated that Lexington has been using the Battle Green for 250 years in the exercise of these rights and is confident that it is possible to continue to use the Battle Green peaceably and safely for the next 250 years. He does not believe a change in policies or regulations is needed. Mr. Lucente asked if the Board believes any limits should be placed on pedestrian island directly in front of the Captain Parker Statue for those assembling. Mr. Pato suggested opening up some portions of the grass area behind the statue to allow for impromptu events. He would like to see the use of this area broadened. Toby Sackton, 8 White Pine Lane, stated that there has been a long tradition of public protest and political activity in the Center. Lexington Alarm was started by an ad hoc group to reawaken the spirit of resistance to tyranny that animated America's founding 250 years ago. The group peacefully opposes government actions that violate the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. The group strongly opposes the request to expand the definition of the Battle Green beyond the grassy area, because the Captain Parker statue represents the beating heart of the Town's history. The resistance to tyranny today is deeply grounded in the history and reflects the values that Captain Parker and the Minute Men defended on the Green. This activity of standing out and expressing the historical concern about tyranny should not be met with more restrictions on freedom of speech and assembly in Lexington. Dawn McKenna, 9 Hancock Street, stated that, first and foremost, this is a national treasure, and a National Historic landmark. The discussion that this is somehow an expansion of the Battle Green is incorrect. The Battle Green has changed sizes multiple times over the years. It is important to understand that the way the area is being used now was not the original intention. She stated that, per page 49 of the Battle Green Master Plan, the Select Board’s charge was to ask for a draft regulation. The Board has never passed that draft regulation. Linda Patch, 75 School Street, stated that some of the purported concerns that have been heard include tourist foot traffic, photography, and walkway obstruction. These pale in comparison to the foundational rights at stake: the freedom of speech and the right to peaceful assembly. If the Town begins to prioritize postcard perfect images and commercial convenience over civic engagement and constitutional liberty, that is a descent into tyranny, and it is not preserving history. Overreach from any entity must not reshape people’s rights through concocted redefinition and red tape. The redefinition of what constitutes the Battle Green in order to limit protest space is politically and morally corrosive. Designated protested zones recall authoritarian regimes, not democratic towns. Elizabeth Garrels, 11 Plymouth Road, stated that for four or five weeks now, she has demonstrated with the Minute Women for Democracy. This group comes together for a half hour at the statue of Captain John Parker on the Lexington Green. As the group's name indicates, it gathers to speak out in defense of democracy and to decry the growing threats are seen to weaken or even destroy the sacred democratic institutions of this country. Jessie Steigerwald, Cedar St, stated that she has helped organize or support 20 protests since February 5. She stated that the increase in activity being seen, especially around Captain Parker, has nothing to do with the physical improvement of the sidewalk, and everything to do with the issues at stake, namely with President Donald Trump working to dismantle democracy. Having a central place means a lot to gather people together. It has also been great for tourism in the Center. On May 1, Captain Mazerall approached her during a large turnout event and noted that people could not stand on the sidewalk/stone dust area. There does need to be clarification. She echoed Mr. Pato’s suggestion to allow people to use the sidewalk. Clarence Labonte, Grove St, stated that the minute any restriction is place on, or anyone is given the power to control, the ability to speak, this is a downhill spiral. Charlie Bauer, 2 Oakland St, stated that his background is civil rights. He has represented law enforcement for over 40 years in the State of New Hampshire. The proposal is a complete ban on speech and assembly in a public area. The United States Supreme Court and the highest court in Massachusetts has stated that any banning or limiting of free speech and free assembly on a public sidewalk, street, or park, must be done in the most narrow and constricted way possible. This proposal states that demonstrations, which are not defined, should be across the road. That is not narrowing the restrictive use, as required under the law. He stated that he would be willing to work with Town Counsel to address both safety, which is essential, as well as the freedoms of right of assembly and speech. Avram Baskin, 43 Carville Ave, stated that holding political protests in front of the Minuteman statue sends a unique and symbolic message. Symbolism that will be lost if residents are restricted to protesting along Mass Ave or on the sidewalks around the Battle Green. If the concern is that groups of peaceful protesting residents somehow impact the accessibility or experience of tourists, most, if asked, would likely temporarily spend their First Amendment rights and gladly step aside so people can take photographs in front of the Minuteman statue. Mr. Sandeen stated that there needs to be more public outreach to determine what the public believes should occur. It was agreed that a Mr. Pato and Ms. Hai would continue to review this item and bring back another proposed amended policy to preserve public safety when gathering on or near the Battle Green. DOCUMENTS: Battle Green Memo from PD, Proposed Changes Battle Green Regulations – redlined, Battle Green Use Regulation, Battle Green Proposed Boundaries Map The Board took a brief recess. 5. Approve: Conduct and Decorum for Public Meetings Policy Mr. Lucente explained that, at the July 8, 2024, Select Board meeting, the Board reviewed and discussed the proposed Conduct and Decorum for Public Meetings Policy, which is intended to establish clear and consistent guidelines for behavior at public meetings. The policy outlines expectations for participation, order, and respect, while ensuring alignment with constitutional protections for public speech, as affirmed in Barron v. Kolenda and other relevant case law. Suggested edits from the July meeting have been incorporated into the revised draft. Town Counsel has reviewed the current version and is satisfied with its content. Approval of this policy will allow for its inclusion in both the Select Board Procedures, Policies, and Regulations Manual and the Town Clerk’s Board and Committee Handbook. The Board reviewed the draft policy and made some edits. Town Counsel Mina Makarious also suggested amendments. Bob Pressman, 22 Locust Ave, stated he feels that this is a highly flawed document which comes to the Board with no statement of facts as to why committees should be micromanaged in the way identified, and, more importantly, hides and distorts the full scope of freedom of speech as identified in the Kolenda decision. Melinda Walker, 14 Larchmont Ln, asked if language within the document means that boards and committees have to require a time for public comment. Mr. Lucente stated that this does not mean that public comment is required at each public meeting. If there is public comment, the chair should announce the guidelines. Ms. Walker stated that it is confusing to some committee in terms of what the policies are for declaring public meetings as working sessions. VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve the Conduct and Decorum for Public Meetings Policy with the five edits as outlined this evening, and to incorporate it into the Select Board Procedures, Policies, and Regulations Manual and the Town Clerk’s Board and Committee Handbook. DOCUMENTS: Policy-Conduct and Decorum for Public Meetings-060925, Redline_Conduct_and_Decorum_Comparison_from_July Version 6. Approve: List of Legal Holidays during which Construction Noise is Limited as it Relates to Noise Control Bylaw Chapter 80 Mr. Lucente explained that, at the 2024 ATM, Town Meeting voted to approve amendments to Chapter 80 (Noise Control) of the General Bylaw to clarify when construction noise is restricted. As part of this update, the bylaw now defines “Legal Holidays” as those recognized by the Commonwealth and those identified on a list approved by the Select Board [Article 29, adopted 3/18/24]. To comply with this provision, the Select Board is asked to formally approve the list of holidays during which construction activity is subject to restrictions. This action ensures clear communication to residents, contractors, and enforcement departments. The proposed list reflects: The 12 Massachusetts-recognized legal holidays The same list of 12 holidays presented to Town Meeting during the Article 29 presentation This approval will aid in consistent enforcement by the Building Department, DPW, and Police, and addresses recent public inquiries about when construction is limited due to holidays. VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve the following legal holidays during which construction noise is limited, as outlined in the Noise Control Bylaw, Chapter 80. New Year’s Day Martin Luther King Day Presidents Day (Commonwealth of Mass - Washington’s Birthday) Patriots Day Memorial Day Juneteenth Independence Day Labor Day Indigenous Peoples' Day (Commonwealth of Mass - Columbus Day) Veteran’s Day Thanksgiving Day Christmas Day DOCUMENTS: List of MA legal Holidays, Article 29 noise presentation posted 2.12 7. Discussion: Proposed Compost Pilot Partnership with Black Earth at Hartwell Avenue Site Andrew Brousseau, Black Earth Compost, stated that the proposal is for a pilot with the Town at Hartwell Ave, with the goal being to integrate food scraps into the existing yard waste operation. In the long term, this will save the Town the most money and provide the service for the lowest cost. This would include a reduction in the Town's collection bill of approximately 5%. There would also be a revenue portion, that for every cubic yard of compost sold, the company would provide a revenue payment to Hartwell to help compensate their books. The pilot would allow the Town to determine if it would like to continue with this into the future. Mr. Sandeen thanked Town staff and Black Earth for moving this forward. Ms. Kumar asked how to make this pilot successful. Mr. Brousseau stated that some metrics of success include how the company works with Hartwell and if the operations match. There could be a concern regarding complaints, such as rodents, which are outside of the company’s control. Making sure the project is financially viable is also important. DPW Director Dave Pinsonnault stated that it will be important to make sure the two entities can coexist at the site without impacting each other. The pilot will help to evaluate that. There was agreement to move forward with a pilot partnership and report back to the Board in the future. DOCUMENTS: Black Earth Partnership PPT 8. Discussion: Condo Conversion Board Mr. Lucente explained that the Select Board will review and discuss the future of the Condominium Conversion Board, which was established in the 1980s and has remained inactive for well over a decade. While it still appears on the Town’s official list of boards and committees, there are currently no members appointed, and no recent activity has occurred. However, recent resident inquiries, such as one involving a potential condo conversion on Massachusetts Ave., have highlighted the confusion this creates for property owners and staff. In the absence of an active board, questions regarding procedural requirements, such as application review and hearings mandated by Chapter 63 (§63-6) and Chapter 144 of the Town Code, remain unresolved. The Select Board could potentially appoint a standing board, another Town body, or even itself to serve as the Condominium Conversion Board. Options include: Take no action, and wait to see if any issues arise – which preserves the current ambiguity Dissolve the Condominium Conversion Board and Reassign the functions – to staff, another existing board or committee, or the Select Board itself; This would also require amending the relevant Town Code sections. The Board agreed that Staff should make a recommendation as to which committee/board could take over the responsibilities of this Board.Town Counsel Mina Makarious stated that the bylaw already allows the Board to delegate the responsibility to any other board that exists or to the Select Board itself. Jay Luker, Precinct 1, stated that the administrative purposes and tasks can certainly be passed to other entities. The urgency under which this Board was established may be even worse now 30 years later, and he is unclear who will pick up the torch. DOCUMENTS: Condo Board – Charge, Condo Board - Code Chpt 63, Condo Conversion Board - Code Chpt 144 9. Discussion: Board and Committee Member Service Policy Mr. Lucente stated that the Select Board will revisit a long-standing discussion on whether to establish a policy, guideline, or best practice concerning the length of service for members of Lexington’s boards and committees. The aim is to balance respect for dedicated, long-term volunteers with the need to encourage broader participation and foster new leadership. Questions include whether to set expectations for rotating leadership roles (such as chair), whether to limit consecutive years of service for members, and how to approach reappointments. Specifically, whether incumbents should be evaluated alongside new applicants. While prior efforts (including a September 2021 work session, and a July 2022 Memo from the Town Manager) identified interest in these issues, no formal policy was adopted. If the Board wishes to pursue this further, a draft framework will be developed for consideration. Ms. Hai suggested asking committee members and/or chairs their thoughts on these topics. Mr. Sandeen agreed that committee term limits are appropriate and can encourage new voices, but Mr. Sandeen also noted he is concerned about establishing chair term limits as it can take new chairs some time in order to learn how to most appropriately chair and this should be considered. Ms. Kumar stated that she is generally in favor of some sort of limits. 10. Discussion: Potential Creation of Committee Academy Mr. Lucente stated that the Select Board will discuss the concept of launching a “Committee Academy”, a potential half-day training program designed to provide both foundational knowledge and practical skills to current (and, potentially, prospective) members of Lexington’s committees and boards. While the existing Committee Handbook contains valuable information, many members will benefit more from interactive, real-time guidance. This initiative aims to improve consistency, compliance, and confidence across committees by offering training on key areas such as municipal law, ethics, conflict of interest, Open Meeting Law, public records, meeting procedures, and effective public engagement. At this stage, the Committee Academy is presented as a concept. If the Board is supportive, the Select Board Office will collaborate with the Town Clerk’s Office to further develop a proposed framework and content. The Board agreed that it would like to pursue the creation of this academy, with Staff, Mr. Lucente, and Ms. Kumar to work in a small group to gather a framework. EXECUTIVE SESSION 1. Exemption 3: Collective Bargaining - To discuss strategy with respect to collective bargaining (LMEA, LMMA, Fire, Police Superior) VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 4-0 at 10:00 pm that the Select Board go into Executive Session under Exemption 3 to discuss strategy with respect to collective bargaining for the Lexington Municipal Employees Association (LMEA), Lexington Municipal Management Association (LMMA), Fire Department, and the Police Superior Unions, and not to reconvene in Open Session. Further, it was declared that an open meeting discussion may have a detrimental effect on the bargaining and litigating position of the Town. ADJOURN VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 from the Executive Session to adjourn both the Executive Session and the Regular Meeting at 10:25p.m. A true record; Attest: Kristan Patenaude Recording Secretary