HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-08-25BOARD OF APPEALS
August 25, 1977
The Board of Appeals held a regular meeting on Thursday, August 25, 1977,
beginning at 7:30 p.m., in the Selectmen's Meeting Room of the Town Office
Building.
Present: George P. Wadsworth, Chairman
Ruth Morey, Vice Chairman
Woodruff M. Brodhead
Thomas G. Taylor
Clarence D. Turner, Associate
Public hearings were held on the following petitions, notices of the hear-
ings having been mailed and hearings advertised in the Lexington Minute -Man
newspaper as required by statute.
W. Geoffrey Little - variance of the Lexington Zoning By-law to maintain the
existing dwelling at 24 Spring Street with a side yard of 7.46 feet instead of
the required 7.5 feet, and a front yard setback of 24.2 feet instead of the
required 30 feet, and to build a single story extension to the existing garage
and house forming a new family room with side yard of 7.43 feet instead of the
required 7.5 feet.
Andrew J. Lane - special permit, pursuant to Lexington's Zoning By-law Section
25.73 and General By-laws Article XXX, to remove excess loam and fill along the
Edison easement as shown on plan of Woodpark Estates, dated July 31, 1974 and
plan of proposed regrading Woodpark Estates, dated July 28, 1977, plans by
Colburn Engineering Inc.
Walter C. Tomlinson, Jr. - to amend the hours of operation, granted by the Board
of Appeals Permit, dated April 13, 1971, for Denny's Restaurant, 440 Bedford St.,
from the present 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., seven days a week, to twenty -fours per
day, seven days a week.
John C. Przyjemski and Marcella J. Przy emski - on the appeal from the decision
of the Building Commissioner in issuing a building permit to Camillo Sganga at
88 Cliffe Avenue.
DECISIONS: The Board made the following decisions, all in open meeting. See
decisions for more details, all in Board of Appeals' files and also filed with
the Town Clerk.
Little - Granted unanimously.
Lane - Denied unanimously.
Tomlinson — Denied unanimously.
Przyjemski - Request denied unanimously. Note: The Board of Appeals finds that
this appeal involves a boundary dispute rather than a zoning question and that
the Land Court is the proper forum to decide the issue.
The meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
' Respectfully submitted,
Evelyn F. Cole, Administrative Clerk