HomeMy WebLinkAbout1946-07-2579
BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING
July 25, 1946
A meeting of the Board of Appeals wau held in the Select-
men's Room, Town Office Building on Thursday evening, June �5,
1946 at 7:30 p.m. Messrs. Locke, Brown, Nickerson, and
Associate Members Ripley and Ballard were present. In the
absence of Mr. Bowker, Mr. Locke acted as Chairman.
Further consideration was given to the application of Charles
J. Bjorkgren for permission to erect a building at the rear of
265 Bedford Street, Lexington for the purpose of storage and
playroom which will not have the required setback farmm the street.
The Chairman read a letter from Mr. Lynch, Town Counsel,
regarding the Bjorkgren petition.
The Chairman said that if the building had been set back
twenty feet, the Building Inspector could probably -have granted
a permit. He stated that the building was approximately 22t x
301.
Mr. Nickerson said that he thought it was very easy for
contractors to depart from the requirements of a residential
area and cause an unsightly condition.
Mr. Brown wondered why the building was so large if the man
only intended it for the storage of ladders and tools.
Mr. Nickerson said he did not like to see a house, garage
' and then another house or building on so small a lot.
Mr. Ripley said that Mr. Bjorkgren was governed largely
where he proposed to put the building by the fact that he wanted
to have a garden. The soil is very poor on part of the land and
very good on another part. If the building was set back farther,
it would ruin the little garden that he has.
At 8:07 p.nA. hearing was declared open upon the application
of Julia Grant for permission to sub -divide a parcel of land,
located at 627 Massachusetts Avenue, Lexington, for a building
lot which will not have the required frontage.
The notice of the hearing was read by Mr. Brown.
Mr. and Mrs. Julia Grant, their daughter, and Mr. Healey
were present at the hearing.
Mrs. Grant presented to the Board a map showing just what
she proposed to do. She stated that her present house is near
Pleasant Street, and is called the "Old Joy Estate". She said
that the present frontage on Lot A-1 is approximately 196.10
feet and she couldn't possibly take any more frontage from this
lot, because the main house requires a large frontage. She said
that she wanted to build a house for herself on the proposed lot;
the new house to be set back in line with the main house.
The Chairman asked how far back she world locate the new
bD.0-ae %
Mrs. Grant stated that she would put it back in line with
the piazza of the main house.
80 x
Mr. Healy said that a house lot on this location was all '
right, but he would not want to see the zoning changed for
anything else.
The Chairman said that there would be no changed in zoning.
Mr. Heilpy said that he would be perfectly satisfied to
have a house there, but he wouldn't want anything also there.
Mr. Grant and his daughter merelyappeared in favor of grant-
ing the permit.
The Chairman said that the matter would be taken under consider-
ation.
Mrs. Grant stated that what she proposed to do was to sell the
main house and build a small house on this lot.
The hearing was declared closed at 8:17 p.m. and the group
retired.
At 8:20 p.m..hearing was declared open on the petition of
0. Henry Janckson for permission to alter the barn located
at 40 Clarke Street, Lexington into temporary living quarters.
Mr. Jackson, the petitioner, was the only person present
at the hearing.
Mr. Brown read the notice of the hearing.
Mr. Jackson distributed several copies of blueprints to the
Board. He stated that he wanted a three room apartment on the
second floor of the barn for his daughter and her husband, a
veteran.
The Chairman asked if there were to be any changes in the
'
exterior of the building.
Mr. Jackson said that the only changes would be the addition
of one or two windows. The doorway would be one that was origin-
ally in the barn, and it is entirely separate from the main part
of the barn.
Mr. Jackson said that the apartment would be on the second
floor of the barn and the first floor would be used for storage
purposes.
The Chairman asked what was meant by temporary living
quarters.
Mr. Jackson stated that his son-in-law learning his business,
and it would probably take him about five years to accomplish
this. He stated that he would pipe the heat in from the green-
houses.
Mr. Ballard asked if there would be a chimney.
Mr. Jackson replied in the negative. He said there would be
gas in the kitchen.
The Chairman said that it should be defined as to what is
meant by temporary and that perhaps the restriction should be
made that it be occupied for only a specific time and that only
he or a member of his family should live in it.
Mr. Jackson said that this restriction would be perfectly
agreeable with him.
81-7,
' Mr. Ballard asked if there would be two exits.
Mr. Jackson said that he could put a fire escape on,
leading from the bedroom window.
The hearing was declared closed at 8:37 p.m. and Mr.
Jackson retired.
At 8:40 the hearing was declared open on the application
of James Cataldo for permission to maintain a roadside stand
at the corner of Lowell and Woburn Street, on:iproperty owned
by Mr. Howard M. Munroe.
Mr. Cataldo, Mrs. Porter, Norman Carr and two other
persons were present at the hearing.
Mr. Cataldo said that he would like to have a stand to
sell his vegetables at this location. He would also like to
be able to sell fruit.
The Chairman asked how long Mr. Cataldo had been farming
this land.
Mr. Cataldo replied about twelve years.
The Chaitman asked if he had built anything there.
Mr. Cataldo said he has put up a stand with an awning
over it.
The Chairman asked how large the stand was.
Mr. Cataldo said that it was approximately 12' x 101.
' The Chairman asked what hours he would operate the stand.
Mr. Cataldo replied from 10:00 am to 9:00 p.m.
The Chairman asked about the illumination of the stand.
Mr. Cataldo said there would not be very many lights,
and there definitely would not be any flood lights.
Mr. Cataldo said that the only signs he would have would
be the small signs on the stand itself.
The Chairman asked if he would operate the stand on
Sundays.
Mr. Cataldo said that he would like to have the stand
open on Sundays.
Mr. Brown asked if there would be room enough for people
coming in automobiles.
Mr. Cataldo said that he had room enough to accommodate
six automobiles at the same time, and he did not think there
would be any need for parking on the street. Mr. Cataldo said
that if they haven't enough room, he will &evel down the bank-
ing for additional parking space.
Mr. Ripley asked Mr. Cataldo how long he would need the
permit.
Mr. Cataldo said that it would be a seasonable permit.
Mrs. Porter stated that she was in favor of granting the
permit.
Pair. Norman Carr said that he was also in favor of grant-
ing the permit.
82
0c,
c�
No one appeared in opposition, but a letter was received
'
signed by Mr. Howard M. Munroe stating that he did not favor the
issuing of a permit for stand at 105 Lowell Street. Mr. Munroe
did not give any reason for his opposition.
Mr. Cataldo said that he could not understand why Mr.
Munroe did not want the permit granted. He stated that he had
talked with Mr. Munroe about the stand and Mr. Munroe did not
have any objections.
Mr. Cataldo said that he leases the property form Mr. Munroe
every year.
Mr. Cataldo said that he was not trying to put up a stand
against Mr. Munroe's wishes. Ue said that he had spent $150
for the awning because he understood that Mr. Munroe was in
favor of granting the permit.
The Chairman said that the Board has the right to grant a
permit to the owner to sell only the products that have been
grown on his land.
Mr. Cataldo said that when leaning a piece of property,
the tenant becomes the owner.
The Chairman said that he would have to check with the Town
Counsel.
Mr. Cataldo said that he would talk with Mr. Munroe to see
what his objections were.
The hearing was declared closed at 8:55 p.m. and the group
retired.
'
The notice of the hearing was read by Mr. Brown.
Mr. Ripley said that the Town Counsel should be contacted
to find out whether or not persons leasing property should be
termed as the owner.
The Chairman retired at 9:00 p.m. to phone the Town Counsel
for an opinion on the matter. He returned to the meeting; and
said that it was the Town Counsel's opinion that ownership
runs to the duly appointed tenant.
The Board discussed the application of James Cataldo, and
upon motion of Mr. Nickerson, seconded by Mr. Brown, it was
unanimously voted to grant the petition in the following form:
BOARD OF APPEALS PERMIT
The Board of Appeals, acting under the Lexington Zoning
By -Law and General Laws, Chapter 40, Sections 25 to 30 as
amended, having received a wtitten petition addressed to it by
James Cataldo a copy of which is hereto annexed, held a public
hearing thereon of which notice was mailed to the petitioner and
to the owners of all property deemed by the Board to be affected
thereby as they appear on the most recent local tax list and
also advertised in the Lexington Minute -Man, a newspaper
1
m
' published in Lexington, which hearing was held in the Select-
men's Room, in the Town Office Building on the twenty-fifth
day of July, 1946•
Three regular and two associate members of the Board of
Appeals were present at the hearing. A certificate of notice
is hereto annexed. At this hearing evidence was offered on
behalf of the petitioner tending to show: That Mr. Cataldo
wished to erect a display counter, covered by an awning,
attached to the house at the corner of Lowell and Woburn
Streets; slid counter running along the front of the house,
12 feet on the front of the house and 10 feet along the
Woburn Street side, on the premises owned by Howard M. Munroe;
that he wished to sell products grown on the premises; the
stand would be operated between 10:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M.,
seven days a week, during the months that the outside stand
could be operated; that sufficient space had been provided so
that it would not be necessary for cars to park on the street
while patronizing the stand; that there,would be no flood
lights and only such illumination as necessary to properly
illuminate the counter.
Three persons spoke in favor of granting the petition.
Letter was received from Howard M. Munroe, owner of the
property, opposing the issuing of a permit for a stand on the
above location. No reason for his opposition was given in the
letter. ,
At the close of the hearing the Board in private session
July 25, 1946, gave consideration to the subject of the petition
and voted unanimously in favor of the following fifldings:
1. That in its judgment the public convenience and
welfare will be substantially served by the making of the exception
requested.
2. That the exception requested will not tend to impair
the status of the neighborhood.
3. That the exception requested will be in harmony with
the general purposes and intent of the regulations in the Lex-
ington Zoning By-law.
4. That owing to conditions especially affecting the said
parcel but not affecting generally the Zoning district in which
it is located, a literal enforcement of the provisions of the
Lexington Zoning By-law as to the locus in question would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner and that desirable relief
may be granted without substantially derogating from the intent
or purpose of such Lexington Zoning By-law.
l
84 0C
..r
pursuant to the said findings, the Board hereby unanimously '
decides that the application of the Lexington Zoning By-law
is hereby varied so far as may be necessary to permit James
Cataldo to maintain a roadside stand at the corner of Lowell
and Woburn Streets on the property owned by Howard M. Munroe
for a period ending July 25, 1947, subject to the following
conditions: That only the products of the land of the owner
shall be offered for sale, that there should be no object-
ionable illumination of the stand; that the use of signs
shall be limited to small signs on the counter; that the
stand shall not be operated after 9:00 P.M.; that sufficient
parking space off the highway shall be provided on the premises;
and that the premises shall be kept in a neat and orderly
condition at all times.
The Board hereby makes a detailed record of all its pro-
ceedings relative to such petition and hereby sets forth that
the reasons for its decision are its findings hereinbefore set
forth and the testimony presented at the said hearing, including
that herein summarized, and directs that this record immediately
following this decision shall be filed in the office of the
Town Clerk of Lexington and shall be open to public inspection
and that notice of the decision shall" -.be mailed forthwith to
each party in interest.
BOARD OF APPEALS OF LEXINGTON '
(Acting under the Lexington Zonin
By-law and General Laws.)
Errol H. Locke
Aiden L. Ripley
J. ilton Brown
D. E. Nickerson
Walter C. Ballard
I, Hazel J. Murray, Clerk of the Board of -'Appeals of (Lex-
ington, appointed under General Laws, Chapter 40, Section 27,
hereby certify that I sent by postage certificate of mailing
on the 11th day of July, 1946 to James Cataldo, Albert E. &
Marion Olsen, Clifford H. & Mary C. McGee, Jennie Currier,
Leonard K. Dunham, Elmira & Howard Munroe, Elizabeth Porter,
et al, and also advertised in the Lexington Minute -Man
on July 11, 1946, a notice of which the following is a true
copy.
Hazel J. Murray
Clerk,Boardoff-Appeals.
1
N O T I C E
July 119 1946
The Board of Appeals will hold a hearing on the matter
of varying the application of the Zoning By-law upon applicat-
ion from James Cataldo for permission to maintain a roadside
stand at the corner of Lowell and WoburnStreet o pr$pe
owned by Mr. H. y. Munroe, under the Lexington ton ng Y- a
and in accordance with Chapter 40, Sections 25 to 30 as
amended of the General Laws and amendments.
The hearing will be held on July 25, 1946 at 5:30 p.m.
in the Selectmenls Room, Town Office Building, Lexington,
Massachusetts.
Hazel J. Murray�__�
Cler , Board of
Lexington Board of Zoning Appeals
Town Office Building
Lexington, Massachusetts
Gentlemen:
July 5,_1946
The undersigned hereby petitions the Lexington Board of
Appeals, appointed under General Laws, Chapter 40, Sections
25 to 30 as amended, to vary the application of section 9F
Lexington Zoning By-law with respect to the premises
Lowell Street and Woburn Street, owned by H. M.
of Lexington by permitting the following: Sale of
and vegetables.
of the
at No.
Munroe
fruits
James Cataldo
47 Rindge Avenue
Lexington, Mass.
The Board discussed the application of Julia Grant, and
upon motion of Mr. Ripley, seconded by Mr. Ballard, it was
unanimously voted to grant the petition in the following from:
1
on
86
BOARD OF APPEALS PERMIT
The Board of Appeals, acting under the Lexington Zoning
'
By -Law and General Laws, Chapter 40, Sections 25 to 30 as
amended, having received a written petition addressed to it by
Julia Grant a copy of which is hereto annexed, held a public
hearing thereon of which notice was mailed to the petitioner
and to the owners of all property deemed by the Board to be
affected thereby as they appear on the most recent local tax
list and also advertised in the Lexington Minute -Man, a news-
paper published in Lexington, which hearing was held in the
Selectmen's Room, in the Town Office Building on the twenty-fifth
day of July, 1946.
Three regular and two associates members of the Board of
Appeals were present at the hearing. A certificate of notice is
hereto annexed. At this hearing evidence was offered on behalf
of the petitioner tending to show; Mrs. Julia Grant wished to
sub -divide the parcel of land located at 627 Mass. Avenue so
that the lot on which the present residence now stands shall
have approximately 126.10 feet frontage, with an area of approx-
imately 24,330 square feet, designated on plan of Albert H.
Miller and Wilbur C. Nylander, datel June 21, 1946, marked
Lot A-1, that the second parcel of land shall have a frontage
of seventy feet with a lot area of 18,180 square feet designated
on the same plan as Lot A-2. Mrs. Grant stated that any residence
located on Lot A-2 would be set back at least the same distance
as the existing residence on Lot A-1 at 627 Massachusetts Avenue.
No one appeared in opposition.
At the close of the hearing the Board in private session
July 25,1946 gave condideration to the subject of the petition
and voted unanimously in favor of the following findings;
1. That in its judgment the public convenience and welfare
will be substantially served by the making of the exception
requested.
2. That the exception requested will not tend to impair
the status of the neighborhood.
3. That the exception requested will be in harmony with
the general purposes and intent of the regulations in the Lex-
ington Zoning By-law.
4. That owing to conditions especially affecting the said
parcel but not affecting generally the Zoning district in which
it is located, a literal enforcement of the provisions of the
Lexington Zoning By-law as to the locus in question would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner and that desirable relief
may be granted without substantially derogating from the intent
or purpose of such Lexington Zoning By-law. ,
Pursuant to the said findings, the Board hereby
unanimously decides that the application of the Lexington
Zoning By-law is hereby varied so far as may be necessary to
permit Mrs. Julia Grant to sub -divide the parcel of land
located at 627 Massachusetts Avenue as detailed on the plan
submitted, dated June 21, 1946; that any residence located on
Lot A-2, shall be set back from the street at least the set-
back of the building on Lot A-1.
The Board hereby makes a detailed record of all its pro-
ceedings relative to such petition and hereby sets forth that
the reasons for tis decision are its findings hereinbefore set
forth and the testimony presented at the said hearing, includ-
ing that herein summarized, and directs that this record
immediately following this decision shall be filed in the office
of the Town Clerk of Lexington and shall be open to public
inspection and that notice of the decision shall be mailed forth-
with to each party in interest.
r. -
BOARD OF APPEALS OF LEXINGTON
(Acting under the Lexington Zoning
By-law and General Laws.)
Errol H. Locke
' J. Milton Brown
D. E. Nickerson
Aiden L. Ripley ,
Walter C. Ballard
I, Hazel J. Murray, Clerk .of the Board of Appeals of
Lexington, appointed under General Laws, Chapter 40, Section 27,
hereby certify that I sent by postage certificate of mailing
on the 11th day of July, 1946 to Julia Grant, Clifford and
Ruby H. Faulkingham, John R. and Ann G. Paranya, Dennis J.
Healey, Adrian E. E. Jr. & Anita MacKeen, Katherine Zecobs;
Amalie J. Armstrong, Frederick L. & h.abel A. Doyle, Adeline
L. Cataldo, Margaret C. & Martha J. Wilson, Trs'.. Anthony R.
Cztaldo, Lizzie E. Lowell, Leona 0. Truesdell, Henry P. Clark,
and also advertised in the Lexington Minute-Y'an on July 11,
1946, a notice of which the following is a true copy.
Hazei J. Murray
Clerk, Board 67 -Appeals.
N 0 T I C E
July 11, 1946
' The Board of Appeals will hold a hearing on the matter
of varying the application of the Zoning By-law upon petition
of Julia Grant for permission to sub -divide a parcdl of land
Q
located at 627 Massachusetts Avenue, for a building lot
which will not have the required frontage, under the Lex-
ington Zoning By-law and in accordance with General Laws, Chapter
40, Sections 25 to 30 as amended.
The hearing will be held on Thursday evening, July 25,
1946 at 8:00 p.m. in the Selectmen's Room, Town Office Build-
ing, Lexington, Massachusetts.
Hazel J. Murray
Clerk, Boar7 of Appeals.
June 25, 1946
Lexington Board of Zoning Appeals
Town Office Building
Lexington, Massachusetts
Gentlemen:
The undersigned hereby petitions the Lexington Board
of Appeals, gppointed under General Laws, Chapter 40, Sections
25 to 30 as amended, to vary the application of sedtion 6A
of the Lexington Zoning By-law with respect to the premises at No ,
627 Massachusetts Avenue, Lexington,* by permitting the following:
A sub -division of land for a building lot, which will not have
the required frontage.
*otiened by rsulia Grant Julia Grant
627 Massachusetts Avenue
Lexington 73, Massachusetts
Mrs. Grant is to give the Board d final tracing of the
subdivision before the Board can actually sign the plot plan.
The Board considered the petition of C. Henry Jackson,
and upon motion of Mr. Nickerson, seconded by Mr. Ripley, it
was unanimously voted to grant the petition in the following
form:
BOARD OF APPEALS PERMIT
The Board of Appeals, acting under the Lexington Zoning
By -Law and General Laws, Chapter 40, Sections 25 to 30 as
amended, having received a written petition addressed to it
by C. Henry Jackson a copy of which is hereto annexed, held
a public hearing thereon of which notice was mailed to the
petitioner and to the owners of all property deemed by the
' Board to be affected thereby as they appear on the most recent
local tax list and also advertised in the Lexington Minute -
Man, a newspaper published in Lexington, which hearing was held
in the -Selectmen's Room, in the Town Office Building on the_
twenty-fifth day of July, 1946.
Three regular and two associate members of the Board of
Appeals were present at the hearing. A certificate of notice is
hereto annexed. At this hearing evidence was offered on behalf
of the petitioner tending to show: That G. Henry Jackson
requested permission to alter the barn located at 40 Clarke
Street, Lexington at the rear of the present dwelling, making
temporary living qugrters on the second floor of the barn; that
there would be no changes to the exterior of the building except
the installation of a doorway and windows; that the alterations
would consist of providing space for a living room, bedroom,
kitchen, dinette, and bath; that it would be occupied by his
daughter and her husband.
No one appeared in opposition.
At the close of the hearing the Board in private session
July 25, 1946, gave consideration to the subject of the petttion
and voted unanimously in favor of the following findings:
1. That in its judgment the public convenience and welfare
will be substantially served by the making of the exception
' requested.
2. That the exception requested will not tend to impgir
the status of the neighborhood.
3. That the exception requested will be in harmony with
the general purposes and intent of the regulations in the Lex-
ington Zoning By-law,
4. That owing to conditions especially affecting the said
parcel but not affecting generally the Zoning district in which
it is located, a literal enforcement of the provisions of the
Lexington Zoning By-law as to the locus in question would inv&Ive
substantial hardship to the petitioner and that desirable relief
may be granted without substantially derogating from the intent
or purpose of such Lexington Zoning By-law.
Pursuant to the said findings, the Board hereby unanimously
decides that the application of the Lexington Zoning Bp -law
is hereby varied so far as may be necessary to permit C. Henry
Jackson to make alterations to the barn located at 40 Clarke
Street, Lexington, providing temporary living quarters and
subject to the following conditions: That the remodelled build-
ing shall be used for living quarters only so long as the build-
ing is occupied by Mr. Jackson or a member of his immediate
family, but in no event shall it be used after July 25, 1951.
90
The Board hereby makes a detailed record of all its pro-
ceedings relative to such petition and hereby sets forth that
'
the reasons for its decision are its findings hereinbefore set
forth and the testimony presented at the said hearing, including
that herein summarized, and directs that this record immediatbly
following this decisimn shall be filed in the office of the
Town Clerk of Lexington and shall be open to public inspection
and that notice of the decision shall be mailed forthwith to
each party in interest.
BOARD OF APPEALS OF LEXINGTON
(Acting under the Lexington Zoning
By-law and General Laws.)
Errol H. Locke
Aiden L. Ripley
Walter C. Ballard
D. E. Nickerson
J. Milton Brown
I, Hazel J. Murray. Glerk of the Board of Appeals of Lex-
ington, appointed under General Laws, Chapter 40, Section 27,
hereby certify that I sent by postage certificate of mailing on
the 11th day of July, 1946 to C. Henry Jackson, Elizabeth K. ,
& Katherine Buckley, Sarah B. Smith, Marion W. Perry, Frances
L. Roberts, Elizabeth R. Nourse, Gertrude M. Gosgrove, Louis L.
Crane, Paul A. & Viola Rinkland, Thomas P. & Catherine Murray,
and also advertised in the Lexington Minute -Man on July 11,
1946, a notice of which the following is a true copy.
Hazel J. Murra
ark, Board o ppeals
N 0 T I C E
July 11, 1946
The Board of Appeals will hold a hearing on the matter of
varying the application of the Zoning By-law upon petition of
C. Henry Jackson for permission to alter the barn located at
40 Clarke Street, Lexington into temporary living quarters, under
the Lexington Zoning By-law or in accordance with Chapter 40,
Sections 25 to 30 as amended.
The hearing will be held in Thursday evening, July 25, 1946
at 8:15 p.m. in the Selectmen's Room, Town Office Building,
Lexington, Massachusetts.
Hazel J. Murray '
Clerk, Board of Appeals.
' July 3, 1946
Lexington Board of Appeals
Town Office Building
Lexington, Massachusetts
Gentlemen:
The undersigned hereby petitions the Lexington Board of
Appeals, appointed under General Laws, Chapter 40, Sections
25 to 30 as amended, to vary the application of the Lexington
Zoning By-law with respect to the premises at No. 40 Clarke
Street, owned by C. Henry Jackson of Lexington, Mass. by
permitting the following: Alteration of existing barn into
temporary living quarters.
C. Henry Jackson
40 Clarke Street
Lexington, Mass.
The Hoard then took up the petition of Charlena J. Bjorkgren.
Mr. Nickerson said that a.13,500' lot is quite small for a
large house, garage and then another building.
Chairman said that the building did seem to be quite an
1The
elaborate building.
Mr. Nickerson said that the use of this building really comes
quite close to being a business.
Mr. Ripley wanted to know if it were within the jurisdiction
of the Board of Appeals to say anything about the size of a build-
ing going on a lot.
The Chairman said that the Board is liftited as to what they
can allow. He stated that Mr. Bjorkgren's petition was for
permission to erect a dwelling for storage and playroom which
will not have the required setback from the street.
Mr. Ripley wanted to know if the permit was denied, could
Mr. Bjorkgren increase his garage space.
Mr. Nickerson said that he would have to make out an appli-
cation to enlarge the garage.
Mr. Brown said that perhpps Mr. Bjorkgren could have put
the building up without coming before the Board of Appeals if
he had had the required frontage.
Mr. Ripley wondered if the Board would have any objections
if Mr. Bjorkgren decides to sacrifice his vegetable garden space
and sets the building back within the rules.
Mr. Ballard said that he thought it would then be up to
the Building Inspector.
Mr. Nickerson felt that he should produce his deed so as
to find out whether or not he can erect more than two dwellings
92con
_ x
ca
on the lot. '
The Board decided to check with the Building Inspector and
the Town counsel, if necessary, to find out if the Board is only
interested in the setback. Also, to see if the dried can be
obtained.
The hearing was adjourned until a later date.
The records of June 14, lune 19, and July 18, 1946 were
declared approved.
The meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
A true record, Attest:
er - pro tem.
t