Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-02-25-PWGC-rpt.pdf Art cle 37 Feoruary 25, 1966 Board of Selectmen 7c—il Of:Ice 7,Aicing Lex:7ngton, ivI2sscnt,Eetts 02173 Gentleten: Enclosed is the report of the Committee on the Public Works Gal7rge We htpe it is satisfactory to you. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to serve. Very t,:uly , ... airman John H hugh M Chapin Ilbert Gray John J Car7oll Otls Brown REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE February 25, 1966 Article 13 of the Special Town Meeting held on November 24, 1964 authorized the Selectmen to obtain preliminary plans and specifications for alterations and additions to the Public Works Garage on Bedford Street The sum of $2,000 was appropriated in conjunction with the article In the spring of 1965 the Selectmen appointed the following committee to assist the Board in carrying out the intent of the Town Meeting vote: Robert Cataldo, Selectman - representing the Board John H. Blaisdell, representing the Appropriations Committee Hugh M Chapin, representing the Capital Expenditures Committee Albert Gray, Executive Assistant to the Board John J. Carroll, Sub,t. of Public Works and Town Engineer In order to keep the Town Meeting Members fully informed as to the workings of the committee, it requested that the TMMA appoint an official representative to attend all meetings. The appointee was Otis S Brown, former Selectman The first meeting of the committee was held on June 11, 1965. Selectman Cataldo was elected chairman From the beginning the committee recognized that it was faced with a complex problem It knew that the Public Works Department was carrying out its day to day operations from a building that was becoming increasingly older, overcrowded and inefficient. However, it also felt that before it could make recommendations as to how these problems of space and efficiency could be solved, it had to find the answers to many questions SPACE i' much additional space was needed right now? What new services might the Public-. 14,,,TYs. L9., called upon to perform now or in the future -2- that might require additional space for men and equipment? Recognizing the fact that the department now uses two other buildings for storage of supplies, what could happen that might require this storage to be at the Public Works Garage? Were taere any otbar departments which might want storage space at the garage now or in the future? LOCATION Should the Public Works Garage remain where it is? Maybe a better site could be found. If so, could the present land and building be sold for such a price and for such a use that the Toun would greatly benefit by the move? OTHER RELATED PROBLFM3 Could the present overcrowding in the Town Office Buildings be alleviated, or permanently solved, by moving - say the entire administrative and engineering A operations of the department - to new quarters at the Public Works Garage? To these and many other quesions tae Committee set out to find answers. With the approval of the Selectmen, the scope of the study was broadened so that the Board would have the bepe2it of all the facts in making any recommenda- tion to the Town Meeting SPACE Why do we peed additional space" How much do we need? Whcn is it needed? The nost immediate reason for needing extra space is that the present building _s grossly inadequate in many ways: Vehicle Storage Area The total area for vehicle storage does not allow all the dePartment's 70 pieces of equipment to be stored inside and then only by jamming and crowding them together in a mish-mash that is extremely inefficient from an operating point of view, -3- The results are as follows: 1,) The trucks cannot be stored with their plows in front of them. If this were able to be accomplished, a great deal of time would be saved and increased efficiency would result. 2, ) In an emergency the needed piece of equipment is often the one that is blocked by two or three others. This means wasted time and is ineffecient, 3 ) All of the department's equioment cannot be stored inside This is particularly bad in the winter when cold weather produces many problems Each Friday night and on many weekdays during the winter, the trucks are stored with heir chains and plows on so that they will be ready to go when snow starts. If no s`orrl occurs, then the first order of business on the follow ng woskda ,,.ora-ng is to move everything out of she tu-ldirs so that the plows can be removed and stored outside. If the trucks were parked inside each night with their plows in front of them, this wasteful and time consuming operation could be eli.minated. Mechanics' Area This section (which can best be described as an alley) is poorly located, tar too mall in area and is poorly laid out. At the present time it contains one hydraulic lift so located that when being used it blocks the entire mechanic's alley The alley itself can be often plugged up by a piece of heavy Equipment such as a dozer under repair and made immobile by removal of its tracks or engin, In addit..on the mechanics' stock room for repair parts is insu fIcient 3n at ;.: -4- Other Areas The lunch room is too small; the toilet facilities are outmoded and in- adequate; there are no shower facilities, the administrative area is in- adequate with no offices where supervisory personnel can work or discuss problems in private; the general stock rooms are too small. There is no storage area where small equipment and certain materials such as barricades, chains, pumps etc can be stored and repaired. (See diagram) Effect of Town Growth It is fairly obvious that as the Town grows the need becomes greater for more men and more equipment to keep up with the demand for the increased volume of services now being offered. The consequence is the need for more space Effect of New Services With growth the demand for new types of services increases. More and more we hear talk about the possibility of such additional services as municipal rubbish collection or combined rubbish and garbage collection and leaf pickup. The Committee feels that the time has now come when all Town vehicles should be serviced at the Public Works Garage. With this general idea of centralized vehicle maintenance in mind, the Committee contacted the School Committee to ask about the possibility of the Town ever owning and maintaining its own school buses. The reply stated that the chances of such a situation occuring within the next ten years were highly probable If this did happen, tae Committee felt that the logical place for storing the buses would be at the Public Works Garage (although probably out- side) and that the Public Works Department would have to service them. -5- Other Space Problems After discussion with the Civil Defense Director, the Committee agreed that any addition should provide for a small amount of dead storage space for Civil Defense supplies The Committee also felt that any addition should provide space for those Park supplies which are now stored in an old wooden building on the Buckman Tavern grounds and in a cement block structure at the Center playground. The Supt of Public Works was then asked to estimate space requirements for a near saturation population of 45,000, taking into ccnsfleration that by that time the Public Works Department might be providing municipal rubbish collection and servicing all Town vehicles With all of the above information at hand, on September 14, 1965 the Committee unanimously voted to reccmmen-! to the Selectmen that approximately 26,000 square feet of additional space be added to the present 22,800 square feet of useable area now available at the Public Works Garage. The recommenda- tion was quite specific in stating that it did not mean that the entire 26,000 square feet should all be in new construction. It felt that alteration and structural changes within the present building would provide some of the additional area needed. LOCATION Should a new Public Works Garage be Constructed on Another Site? The Committee felt that if this question were to be answered affirmatively, the new site would have to serve the Town as well or better than the present one lt -wield have to he centrally boated, must have approximately the same area (9 acres) as tAic pmc,%extt one aud must be located an or near a major road of the Town -6- Furthermore the sale and subsequent tax revenue from future use of the land and buildings would have to clearly offset the cost of land acquisition, building construction and land development of the new site. Some eighteen potential areas within a mile and one-half radius of the Center of Town were examined by the Committee. Of these, only three met the requirements for providing a good location for a Public Works Garage, and even these would require extensive site preparation in order to be acceptable. In the meantime the Committee asked the Planning Board what it felt would be the best use of the land on which the present building is located, how it felt about the Public Works Garage being moved elsewhere and if this move did occur, how it thought the land should be zoned In addition the Assessors were asked to determine the present value of the property based on current C-1 zoning and under two other possible zoning conditions. The Planning Board replied that it thought the present municipal use of the land should continue However, it also said that if the garage were to be moved elsewhere that the area should be zoned residentially, with the future possibility of changing it to a "Tradesmen Park". The Assessors reported that the present value of the property was approxi- mately $140,000. based on current C-1 zoning. They did not report the value of the property as it would be under residential or "Tradesmen Park" zoning. How- ever, the Committee felt that C-1 was the controlling zoning. It was the considered judgement of the Committee that the cost of land zrx,atnItion, land development and new building construction reduced by the sale of t-kw pIt property would exceed the cost of rebuilding and expanding the present eiblic Itkiera c...,,rev„e at the present site. On the upe,tm ,T Gsvamittee -4,ote.d unanimously on -7- September 14, 1965 to recommend to the Selectmen that the Public Works Garage should remain in its present location. Tae basis for the recommendation may be summed up as follows: 1.) The present f'blic Works Garage is structurally soLnd. 2 ) It can La expa:ided relatively easily. 3. ) The lard area o" the present site is adequate. 4. ) The present site has been used for many years for the same purpose and meats with general public acceptance. 5 ) ii:Le present site is centrally located within the Town. 6.) Of the eighteen sites studied by the Committee only three were found to he satisfactory and none were better all around than the present one (See map) 7.) In the light of information received from the Planning Board and Assessors, the Committee felt there would be a real financial loss to the Town if a new Public Works Garage were to be constructed on another location. OTHER RELATED PROBLEMS Are the present Town Office Buildings adequate to meet the future needs of the Town? If they are not, could an addition to them be post- poned temporarily, or permanently avoided, by moving - say the Public Works Administration and Engineering - to new quarters at the Public Works Garage? The Committee felt that these were important questions and ones to which answers must be found before it could proceed with any plans for altering or adding to the Public Works Garage it therefore contacted all Town Lepartmenta Kwit.h the exception of -8- the School Department) who now occupy, or who might in the future occupy space in the Town Office Buildings and it asked them to declare their immediate space needs and to estimate their space requirements for a saturation population of 45,000. All departments replied. The results of the survey showed that there is a need for immediate additional space. Of importance is that the pro- jected space requirements indicate approximately 8,000 square feet of floor space more than the 11,000 square feet now available should be provided within 10 years. The obvious next question is whether the problem of overcrowding in the Town Offices could be sol9ed by moving Public Works Administration and Engineering to new quarters at tae Public Works Gr-g2. And if this shift did occur, would other Town departments and the public be so seriously in- convenienced that the change would prove detrimental to the Town in the long run? The Committee therefore ran a month-long, daily survey to determint the possible effects of such a transfer. Every person entering the Town Office Building was counted and was asked whether his trip included business with both the Public Works Department and some other Town department. In addition, a close check was kept in all departments on the number of business visits (which could not have been made by telephone) that employees made between all other departments and the Public Works Adminis- tration. Based on the results of the survey, the Committee voted unanimously on September 14, 1965 to recommend to the Selectmen that the Public Works Administration and Entineerinz sections should remain in the Town Offire Building. -9- The basis for the recommendation may be summed up as follows: 1.) The extent to which the shift would inconvenience the public and other departments was not great enough so that it should be a major factor in making the decision. 2. ) The efficiency of the entire Public Works Administration would not be substantially increased by the move. 3. ) At the present time the shift would not provide a permanent solution to the space problem in the Town Office Buildings. PRELIMINARY PLANS 81 SPECIFICATIONS On September 14, 1965 the Committee received permission to talk to architects for the purpose of preparing preliminary plans and specifi- cations A total of fourteen aero interviewed. On Nov_Lber 8th, the Board of Selectmen accepted the Committee's recommendation to hire William A. Halsey, Architect and Planner of 134 Mount Auburn Street, Cambridge. DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN From the beginning of the development of design phase, the Committee felt, and continues to feel, that the interests of the local neighborhood would be served best if there were to be no expansion of the facility to- ward Bedford Street It also felt that all major vehicle movement within the complex should be in the "back yard". The Architect agreed that these recolmments would not seriously affect his attempts at solution of the problem Working closely with the Committee, he began analyzing the needs utvl program of the. Public Works Garage facility. Analysis indicated that the Irr',/,ruz .,*-cini-..a.1x+scil four major functions: -10- 1. ) Vehicle Storage 2, ) Mechanics' Work 3. ) Stock and Storage 4. ) Administrative and Employee Facilities In his initial attempt at solution, the Architect placed these functions in separate buildings. However, it became evident in Committee discussions with the Supt, of Public Works that in order to maintain and improve the effici2ncy of the operation of the department and to attain certain desired relationships both within and between the various functions, that consolidation of the facility was necessary All subsequent layouts maintained this concept. The Architect presented many different design - live of which reached the preliminary plan stage - before the Committee was satisfied that it had the best solution to the problem. In studying each scheme the Architect presented, the Committee con- tinually found itself face to face with the problem of what to do with the present building. It was constantly reminded of its previous thinking that alteration and structural changes would provide some of the needed additional space. Since in the final analysis this thinking was chauged somewhat, a detailed report follows telling how and why the existing building was treated in the final plan IWRO,RK; WITH UTILIZING THE PRESELT BUILDING Mc! p-rse_nt structure is approximately 113 feet wide and 2C2 feet long. It has an It.lIng clumn spacing of 20' - 0" x 22' - 6" It is structurally sound and in g,c3o4 -11- Vehicle Storage The first thought of the Committee and the Architect was to utilize the present building as much as possible for vehicle storage However, careful analysis of both turning movements and space needs of existing vehicles proved that the column spacing was a major deterrent to an efficient use for vehicle storage. Furthermore, a structural analysis turned up the fact that while it was possible to remove every other column in the building in various combinations, it would have to be done at a minimum cost (due to substituting structural work) of roughly $1000. per column. The analysis also proved that the removal of adjacent columns in any combination was entirely impractical. Since removing every other column would still act pnDvike efficient vehicle storage, would be expensive, and would leave the Town with an old building, the Committee decided that it would not propose this as a permanent solution to this problem, Mechanics' Work Area The column spacing again, as well as the age of the structure became serious objections to using any part of the present building for a mechanics' work area that would be expected to provide the ultimate solution to the Town's needs. The Committee therefore felt that the space for mechanics' work area should be provided by new construction. tock and Storage It was obvious that the present building could be used for storage of aupplies and small egaipment. However, its height does not afford efficient storage aTeme awl in order to maintain or attain certain functional relation- ships bet-Aeen Stc,c`e. JO, C."1- 41 Administrative areas, the Committee -12- felt that this space should be provided by new construction. Administrative and Employee Facilities The pivotal important control area of the facility is the office - employee facility area The thinking of the Supt of Public Works is that these areas must afford direct control to the three above. Because of site conditions, the Architect recommended that these offices be contained as rebuilt space about 35 feet deep across the front of the existing building. This will allow an excellent functional relationship to be attained between this area and other major functions of the facility. SUMMARY The Committee arrived at the following conclusions in regard to the present building: 1. ) With the present column spacing, it cannot be used efficiently for vehicle storage. 2 ) Any remodeling of it by eliminating every other column would not increase the efficiency enough to warrant the additional expenditure 3 ) No part of it could be used economically or efficiently as mechanics' area 4.) Functionally it should not be used for storage of supplies and small equipment. 5.) A portion of the front part of it should be rebuilt as administrative and employee facility area. Although not on a satisfactory basis, it is still possible 1-U use the remainder of the building. for vehi.cJe. storage, -13- 7. ) The final solution in the second stage should see existing building torn down and replaced with a new column free structure PROPOSED NEW FACILITY The Committee finally approved a design that shows a building whose core stands on the foundation of the present building but which has wings on the north and south sides and an addition in the rear. The mechanics' work areas for maintenance of all Town vehicles will be housed in the north wing. At the far end of this section will be the paint and sign shop, which will include a vehicle spray booth. The main access to these areas is from within the "back yard", although overhead doors toward Bedford Street will provide a drive through wash rack and emergency access to the work area. Two lifts of 10 ton capacity will be installed at this time with provision for a third in the future. There will also be direct access to the vehicle storage area. Since this area will be rated as high fire hazard, a fire wall will be provided between it and other areas. The total area of this entire wing is 7200 square feet Stock and Storage Area This area has been developed as a wing of 7200 square feet to the south The stock room will contain small items such as repair parts, copper tubing, fittings, etc that will be issued by the dispatcher. The storage area will be used to store small equipment and some materials and will provide an area for repair of equipment such as chains, barricades, etc. later meter repair room has been placed in this wing. Office - MapkuTc.e Facility Area This area is witnin the boundaries of the present building at -14- The Bedford Street end. The area in the southwest corner of the present building contains a general office, as well as sepaLate offices for the Asst Supt. of Public Works, General Foreman, Park Supervisor and Tree Warden, Dispatcher, field office for the Supt. of Public liorks and a conference room The dispatcher's office is located so he will have direct control of the stock area and vehicle storage area The lunch room, adjacent to the office area, will be used additionally as an assembly place each morning for men to receive their assignments, and also serve as a general meeting place. Employee facilities incluCe a locker room with space for 80 lockers, toilets, wash and shower facil4tios. The office of the Head Mechanic is wLth,_n this area, as Is the mechanics' stock room, but at the same time is adjacent to and overlooks the mechanics' work area. The full height of the present building is not necessary in the administration - employee facility areas, so en upper level will be built over these, providing a space for mechanical equipment and dead storage area The total area of the facility at the completion of Stage II will be 43,920 square feet - a total of 21, 120 square feet greater than the present .uilding, and about 5000 sruare feet less than the area originally thought to ue needed, MR, OF Structurally, are prol'osed within the exisAng building. -15- The columns will remain. However, all interior walls, plumbing, etc. will be removed to provide an open area for vehicle storage. The structure of the two new wings will be steel beams or trusses, 15'-- 0" on center with wood joists over Below the wood joists, fire- rated gypsum board will be applied. The exterior walls of the new wings and the front wall of the administrative - employee section will be brick masonry The existing system of unit heaters in the present building will be retained. New gas fired unit heaters will be provided in the stock and storage areas, and the mechanics' work area. The administrative - employee areas will be heated by forced hot water. Existing lighting will be retained in the vehicle storage area of the present building and all new areas will have fluorescent lighting. STAGE I The estimated cost of the first stage of construction which includes the mechanics' wing, stock and storage wing, and the administrative - employee facility section, modifications to existing vehicle storage area, and site preparation, will be $356,000. The situation in regard to vehicle storage will be slightly better than it is now, but by no means will it be adequate Vehicles will still have to be stored one behind the other although a more orderly arrange- ment will be possible (See diagram) WUCIR TT Sr thc4r.t.cnr-1 stage of construction the existing building beyond the aclutWitive - employee facility area will be torn down and a new -16- column-free building will be built on the present foundation. This new construction will extend 60 feet beyond the end of the present structure. Most of the vehicles will have direct access to aisles and there will be some room for addition of vehicles caused by expansion of present services or addition of new ones. This second stage is estimated to cost $272,000. The completion of this stage should see a Public Works Garage that will serve the Town for many years to come ADDENDUM TO "OTHER SITES" (See page 5 of report) February 25, 1966 Late in February the Assessors brought certain facts to the attention of the Committee that made it necessary to reconsider the entire question of whether a new site should be considered. They pointed out that the value of $1410,A00. which they placed on the property in their letter of June 30, 1965 was no lmnger valid. Recent real estate activity in the area indicated that the property should be valued much higher. They felt that the properLy was now worth from $1.10 to $1.50 per square foot. This would place its value as C-1 land at from $400,000 to $600,000. Since the Assessors' appraisal was necessarily made in haste, the Committee ebtained an Hpinion of value from a competent local appraiser. He stated that the pr3pec,y was worth $400,000. less the cost of installing sewer facilit_es at $60,000, or a net Pf $3431 ,0o0. On the basis Pf this new information, the Committee again considered the question! Should a New Public Works Garage be Constructed on An,;ther Site? The only change in facts from when the Committee first examined this question last September was in regard to the value of the present property in its present C-1 zone. The Committee therefore tried to determine what the total effect cm the Tpwn would be if it sold the present property and built a new public Works facility on the best of the three sites the Committee had previously considered. A figure of $400,000. was used for the value of the present land and buildings. ($60,000. more than the appraisor's figure) The cmst of land acquisition, building ccYrAtA:mction and installation of roads and utilities -2- at the proposed new site was carefully worked out as follows: Present Site Alternate Site Stage I $356,000 Land Acquisition $ 80,000 Stage II $272.000 Building & site costs $755.000 Total cost $628,000 Total cost $835,000 Sale of present property L00.000 $435,000 Cost - present site - $628,000 Cost - alternate site- 435.000 Savings to Town $193,000 The Committee then asked itself how much effect an apparent $193,000 savings should have on their previous recommendation that the building should be kept where it is. After serious consideration the Committee on February 21, 1966 voted un- animously to reaffirm their original recommendation that the Public Works Garage should remain where it is. The basis for the recommendation may be summed up as follows: 1.) The land area of the present site is adequate 2.) The present site has been used for many years and meets with general public acceptance. 3.) If the land were to be used for C-1 purposes, some undesirable side effects such as traffic problems could occur due to the large number of uses permitted under that type of zoning. 4.) The Planning Board is unanimously opposed to this land being relinquished by the Town under the present C-1 zoning. The following is a copy of their letter to the Board of Selectmen dated February 18, 1966: -.3- TOWN OF LEXINGTON Massachusetts PLANNING BOARD Town Office Building Lexington, Mass.02173 February 18, 1966 Board of Selectmen Town Office Building Lexington, Mass. Re: Public Works Garage Attn: Robert Cataldo Gentlemen. This is to confirm and, clarify the position of the Planning Board on the use of the parcel of land on which the Public Works garage and workshop are located. The Planning Board is proposing that this land )e rezoned to CS (Service and Trade) district - a new zoning classification in- tended to accommodate contractors' yards and services and other similar uses. It is believed that Public Works garage will fit in well with this type of land use. If the CS rezoning article is not adopted by the Town Meeting, the Planning Board recommends that there be no change of the present use of the parcel of land in question. The Planning Board is strongly opposed to this land being relinouisheo by the Town under its present C 1 zoning. There are very few restrictions on the use of C 1 land and. it could thercfore be developed in a number of ways which would be detrimental to the neighborhood and create a major traffic problem. Should the decision be made to rel cate the Public Works garage and to sell its site, the PLAnning Board will urge a rezoning of this land to R 1 resiaential status. lours very truly, LEXINGTON PLANNING BOARD Alexander V. Zaleski Planning Director • / W % NCE5TETZ N /-\ \ P�U2LtNC"TON_ tows H +'�� LL • ?C`•t O 3 \ V' 00k0,... i ,� V ST gUIte `L'J o ° Z \ 3 ; 11Vt , *13/41 ,L4 © 0 �. Z ` supremo _ _ f (' I �` ��' M',�t et E M.Q ct t4 Ns ..0*"... --. \ 0 < ",, ill 0 w st t1` o mo. • O 0 �� v 40 'OA 1 Woo A`r a o // ` �t 0 Z\'''''...., \ .vs 11 Nr p ______-..; J .• .-+ CO• ., P v 1, N' ~.,~. J� S • Sta`61 CsE SiTE5 ���� -- TnC Aa �,�G.T(j1V TOVirk \ .- sp.covse.`Ts 1966 0 � all \ � V. Z ....? sr 4 `" Sic ACRES !1i , a 4?-1f 4 V i [------ ...., A, ull lir - A� y/ 1 ' SEDFO2 D 1 I ST. PUBLIC W02K 5 G A2A G E 7,:,::.,..1E _ .ze 0 , i . • slu_ is yY� ® D.A IA 6 NOwER ��t Y� C, �� •I#QeswcePr1 .� 0 :v SPRY ER b p =.- I*63SNOWLOAD6R I I ^ 4 tf IV ©4 16 4. 46Qo�LE:2L � s 1rJJ111 .` W 169 BLOWER I I 1 s - _. 1015TRucKSANDE>Z 1 I 1 I ; L 0 I UQ I I Y A) 101T120CK SA NIDE Q N w f I 0.0. ! • i Z Q ---- + �. O RI3VOCK SANDER I < I4 'T i tY 02/MUCKSANDS R I U Y 1 STOCK I Is".°1"" I Iet ■ N 1 2OOM I — I*2I wALTi R9 SANDER I I > I I I04 Cl I I _r N I.17WALTaRSSANDtR I I r—____I -- I �� 11 OSI LS.T�ORAG E 2 I*7 T2ucK I �- 3q 4 v Ca2R7ALL.l 6,3 Ul a I4.2¢TR.ucK I N� .r 1 9 i i N O I PICKUP I ti I • */ 2 • I °18TRU CK 1 3 * I TRUCK 11 /10 TRUCK I it TRUCK I u u lCOMPQEssoR�$ICKJ 1 $16T2ucK I 3 3 fff N ■ I- 1-- • quo . �.T--_�._ J N N rTq^ e¢ I METER m 41 Ie 53 s�, '" 'n. � I ROOM I o � Z Y =° ;° Q r1 U ■ 0a NN N •0 1-1—— ... _ . Ill ®� 3 I " LU tit C H a LI L N sY I 200M i OFFICE .. ...1 1 EXISTING BUILDING VEHICLES SHOWN AS THEY ARE Now USUALLY PA2KED AT NIGHT I. .. . _..I STORAGE OF MATERIALS t. EQUIPMENT C®MPILIE TEED 8 TA IE 11 COLUMNS 2EMAIN IN PRESENT BUILDING ISEri NM IA W C h,� 3 Y WO ®® G� ■$ C S N ■ ■ ; . F 1 . 1 : Ea I.462oL�eRl 3 '� 3op w �i > a a ELSOML80OADEblEarM4 i b yic ■ ■ • .'6B *Gd. ttmallt.3SNOW LOADER I m} t I JWEEDER rjwi■ER Y 1T N/ 79 M® SNOW BIow.R FC �`d a p ® INCI.UADER ■ ■ ■ Teem■ ■ I0I01-RUCKSAN■■RI I *22TRUCK I I1,19TRUCKSANDE I =2GTeucK I I �I»2DT■■cKSANDER II *24 MACK TRUCK I - . — -- • la13lituc•SAN DER I I Jr IGTRUCK I■ r I I 1 ,12 TRUCK I I AI 17 TRUCK I }/ ■ • i• m I I4141RUCK I I $1 TRUCK I # I I •23TRucK1A`IIAUSDURTRucK+I 1+036 COMP.TRucK� METER I STORAGE . 111 . ■ • 1 14,IBREDTRUCK I I FUTUR■I5uc. I Fum•ElkocK fuTUR■IRuCKI 1-1 ■• DU • ■ ■ � .p •Z .9 A ��■� I _ _ — ______ y 00 Y YIo LIFTS N c 6 STOCK OFFICE 1I OFFICEI - PAINTSD ASH QFFICE TU� rl l —1— ��IS P. LI 11___w I i 1Cn/Y F GEI.IEIZA IOTfICE PAINT I I MECHANIC Vel O12K AREA I'-'1 —� _ I_— I IL ,.� SI-109 I MECHANIC LOCKER _ STOCK 2ool..t I LUNCH I I 1 --- I $,TOILETS I I CDNF I 17 I PER IASSIST �_ I I I I I w I C OMPLET ED 3TA.QxE IL 11'27 WALTERS SANOERi I*-tIWALTER794wNOER I Ii 51 GRADER I #44INSLN SNOJ EL I 11 71! d n 7, - t, gl9 Y Y o o ti Y u j N i 4 3 N 4 T Y u �y Y g Y y yy' g P- M Imo' ;1 ;; M MM tS+i`iri 5 HO;:iT Ela ©®O M I ® ® © s ® I rw.t+xma I Tat Ta M1� k�saL ;;�! Y a.z n1°,,. $ �WEal m�+1 63 SNo0Lo Avec I I IS `s I a rua f roM1 WTrucpt I O AiE7ER I STORAGE V W W ri OJ' A Q 4 2 2Q Q r v a i 3 6 o S LIFTS P vW+ rWn N �' c o V .. _ _ _ I PAINT PAINT / FILE IOFFICr E1 DISP. STOCK SPRAY SHOP WASH T M I .L— s....c. OFFICET ^ r1 Iri as F GENAL I O ^� LUNC1 IF ,...,'r IAOFFICERE 1 ICf F ___1l.�E CH AIJIC 4JOfGK A,2EA11 - L I LOCKER ROOK 1 1TolTs LCOMF I [5UPEIE