Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-07-22-SPAIG-min.pdf July 22, 1993 FACILITATOR SUBCOMMITTEE July 17, 1993 Meeting Present: Nancy Adler, Neal Boyle, Andy Friedlich After agreeing facilitators should be non-political , initial discussion involved the skills we want in facilitators. It was noted that the hearings are regarded as a process to set priorities by defining and ranking those things that are important and that we have to protect. Reservations were expressed about formal facilitator training . Once hearing goals have been determined , it was felt that the Implementation Planning Group ( IPG) develop a statement specifying_ the ground rules and expectations of facilitators. The meeting was then broken down into three areas. These included : 1 ) The qualities we want from a facilitator. Can elicit opinions on what people think - Will clarify opinions expressed - Able to enhance discussion (not heated debate) - Has sense of when discussion of particular topic is exhausted and able to move on to another point. 2) Where we will get facilitators. ( It was decided that given the resources available in Lexington , local people are preferable. ) In order of preference: - Local clergy - Debate teacher at HS - Lexington people - Former Selectmen - Business executives - Lawyers - Academics - Consultants, etc . (Get list of people who worked on finance meetings. ) - LWV - State level - Mass. Municipal Assoc . - Universities 3) Facilitator training session . - Have joint meeting of IPG and facilitators. - IPG will establish ground rules and expectations - Jointly develop outline for hearings and hard copy of presentation ( It was assumed that the Rick will work on getting recorders at BU. )