HomeMy WebLinkAbout1913-05-11-BOS-ltr.pdf Seinagier
errs r,a/inotrrd cf it <,
iftte,t., e,n33 54044 May 31st. ,1913.
Mr. George H. Childs,
Chairman of Board of Selectmen,
Lexington, Massachusetts.
W dear Sir,--
With reference td) the title of the Belfry Hill
lot, which the town proposes to buy from William W. Ferguson, I
would report that there are some features regarding it with which I
am not fully satisfied, and which I wish to call to your attention.
I began the examination with the conveyance of Franklin M. Harring—
toh et als to the Lexington NAnument Associ.ation,October 3rd, 1863,
which covered the Belfry Hill lot and a lot of about one quarter of
an acre of land on Vain Street, now Massachusetts Avenue, then occu—
pied by Mrs. Clarissa Harrington, which I understand to be the
brick house now occupied by the Harrington sisters. I assumed the
title good in the grantors in this deed to the Lexington Nenument
Association, except as therein stated: namel ,— that it was subject
to the life interest of Mrs. Clarissa Harrington, who I understand
died some years ago.
The Lexington Monument Association was incorporated in 1850
for the purpose, as stated in its act of incorporation, "of erecting
a suitable monument on the battle ground in the Town of Lexington. . . .
said corporation may receive and hold,by gift, grant or devise, real
and personal estate not exceeding in value the sum of $20,000. , pro—
vided the same be applied exclusively to the erection of a monument,
or the purchasing, fencing and ornamenting of the grounds around the
same."
72—
Mr, George H. Childs, 2.
In December of the same year ( lg63) the Lexington Monument
Association conveyed the premises covered by the foregoing deed
to Isaac H. Frothingham. This deed contains the following re—
t
cital , namely,— "said parcels are conveyed to the said Frothing •
—
ham in trust, to manage and take care of the same for the use and
•
benefit of the said Lexington Monument Association, and suffer said
Association at any time within twelve years from the date hereof to
enter upon said land D40 erect thereon a monument to commeniprate
the opening scene of the Revolutionary War, commonly called the
Battle of Lexington, and if said Association within said twelve
years shall commence to build said monument and expend thereon not
less than ten thousand dollars, the legal estate herein shall vest
in said Associatiox and if at the expiration of twelve years, said
Association shall not have commenced to build said monument and
expend thereon said sum of ten thousand dollars, said Frothingham
shall convey said land to the persons who are the heirs—at—law of
William H. Cary, of Brooklyn, New York, or to their heirs or assigns,
and thereupon all the interest of the said Association shall cease. "
This deed is not accompanied by any vote of the Lexington Monument
Association authorizing this conveyance as there should have been,
and I have no knowledge whether the Association has any records
bearing upon the matter.
Furthermore, the purpose of the corporation,as above stated,
was the erection of a suitable monument "on the battle ground, " and
Belfry Hill was not the battle ground, and the question may be rais—
ed, whether the Association had Ftny authority to take title to the
Belfry Hill property?
?33r-
Mr. George H. Childs,3.
Furthermore , the deed to Frothingham purports to establish a
trust namely,— that unless within tvelvo years the Association
erects a monument and expends ten thousand dollars all its interest
in the real estate covered by the deed would cease and prothingham
was to convey the real estate to the heirs—at—law of the said
William H. Cary.
It appears from the records that seven years later:namely,—
on May 17th, 1£570, the said Frothingham as trustee conveyed to
Clarissa H. Rindge the same premises which were conveyed to him by
the said Lexington Monument Association, excepting therefrom a small
triangular piece of land of 170 feet base and 20 feet altitude ad—
joining the land of Luke W. Wright, which is now the premises occu—
pied by Mr,. George H. Streeter. This conveyance was joined in
by way of assent by George S. Cary, John Hastings and his wife Maria
M. Hastings, stating that they were "some of the heirs—at—law"01
William H. Cary.
Two questions are naturally raised by this deed. First;
what right had Frothingham to convey the premises during the twelve
years, and, second, what title could he give if the conveyance was
assented to by only a portion of the heirs of William H. Cary ( when
the only authority he had, as appears from his trust, as above stat—
ed, was, after the expiration of twelve years, to convey the premis—
es to the heirs of William H. Cary, or their assigns )?
It next appears that on March 30, 127g, Frothingham as owner and
trustee conveyed to the said Clarissa H. Rindge said snail triangular
lot of land, which was excapted in former conveyance to her.
Just where this triangular lot is situated I have not as yet been
able to determine, although it seems to have joined in the rear the
Wright (now Streeter premises) . this conveyance was assented to
-4—
Mr. Sorge H. Childs.
by Nathaniel H. Cary and his wife, Samuel E. Howard executor .of
the estate of George S. Cary, Isaac H. Cary and wife, and Maria M.
Hastings, widow, and heirs—at—law of William H. Cary, deceased.
This assent, however, related only to the small triahgular parcel,
There next appears on the record under the date of April ig,
1g7g, a deed from Nathaniel H. Cary and Isaac H. Cary, described •
as two of the heirs—at—law of William H. Cary, of Brooklyn, New
Yotk, to the said Clarissa H. Rindge, covering the same premises
described in the deed of Frothingham, trustee, to her, of May 17,
1870, above referred to.
Clarissa H. Rindge died in lgg5, and by will gave the rest and
residue of her estate to her son, Frederick H. Rindge. At the time
of her death, she was a widow.
The said Frederick H. Rindge died in 1905, leaving three minor
children,. Samuel K. , Frederick H. and Rhoda A. By his will, he
gave two thirds of his estate to his children equally and one third
to his wife, and subsequently his wife, (two of his children having
then become of age) and the guardian of his remaining child, con—
veyed the premises to Florence E. Hayes in 1912, and Ads. Hayes
shortly thereafter conveyed the premises to William W. Ferguson.
The foregoing records raise the following questions namely,-
1 . Did the Lexington Monument Association under its charter
to erect a monument on the battle ground have authority to purchase
land and erect a monument on Belfry Hill? Apparently, however,
it erected no monument at all.
2. Was the conveyance to Frothingham,without a vote of the
corporati.on,and under the teens of its charter, valid, particularly
in view of the fact that the atranpted declaration of trust provided
that the Association should have twelve years within which to erect
11
to
W. George H. Childs.
the monument?
3. Assuming that the authority of the corporation was suffi—
cient upon the points above mentioned, it would appear from the re—
cords that he made conveyance to Clarissa H. Rindge,rather than to
the heirs of William H. Gary as he was expressly directed to do
by the terms of the trust above mentioned.
4. There is nothing on the records to show that those who
assented to or made conveyance of their interests as heirs of William
H . Cary, as above mentioned, were all of his heirs. If they were
not, there are still outstanding interests, which might not be cut
off by the lapse of time .
Perhaps these points can all be cleared up, or at least enough
of them, so that your board will feel justified, in consequence of
the lapse of time, to take title. I will he glad to confer with
you regarding them, and will also send a copy of this letter to Ivlt^.
Ferguson.
Very truly yours
a - � t