HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-05-22-UTIL-min.pdf Minutes of the Electric Utility Ad-hoc Committee
May 22, 2002
Members in Attendance
Roger Borghesani, Paul Chemick, Norman Cohen, Peter Enrich, Ingrid Klimoff, Patrick
Mehr, David Pavlik, Bob Reid, Kelly McKay Zeoli
Patrick handed out a spreadsheet comparing Nstar rates with those of Massachusetts's
municipalities.
Ken Barna
Ken Barna, a Brookline resident and electric committee member and attorney, came to the
meeting to discuss a memo he wrote in his legal capacity He has several municipal light
plant clients, including Concord. He said that last summer Brookline experienced significant
power outages, so the Selectmen created an electric committee to look into electric power
issues.
Ken explained what he wrote in his memo. He did not want to distribute copies of it, as he
does not want to be perceived as giving legal advice to anyone who is not his client. Points of
his memo.
• The Mass. Legislature has enacted a series of general laws relating to the authority to
create and operate light plants. MGL Ch. 164 is the template for light plants and a
municipality must follow the general laws. MacRae v Concord Selectmen 296 MA
394 (1937).
• In order to start a light plant, a municipality must have 2 Town Meeting (TM) votes
with 2/3 approval for each. Ch. 164 Sections 34, 36. There must be different votes for
aggregation than for the acquisition of the light plant. The votes must be at least 3
months,but no more than 13 months apart. Neither vote is binding,but if there is a
second vote, it is seen as being very serious.
• MGL Ch. 44 Section 8, subsection 8, the municipality has the authority to bond for
capital expenses but not for operating costs. To bond outside of Prop 2 '/z, the
municipality does not have to have an override vote; the vote to authorize the bond by
TM is all that is needed. The light plant does not have the authority to issue debt, only
the municipality does.
• After the TM votes, the municipality will have to negotiate with Nstar regarding the
cost of facilities, 164 Sections 41-43 If there is no agreement on the valuation, then
DTE will determine the outcome. It is a quasi-judicial process with discovery, expert
witnesses, direct testimony, cross examination, hearings, and briefs. An appeal of the
outcome would go directly to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Ch 25,
Section 5
• There have been 2 recent relevant proceedings, Town of Wilmington v Reading Light
Plant and Town of Stow v Town of Hudson.
• Nstar would put up a strong fight to stop any municipality from electric
municipalization and the municipality should expect to spend at least $100,000.
Along with purchasing the poles and wires, there would also be costs for Nstar
bypassing Lexington to service other towns.
• Senator Morrissey and Rep. Bosley are both strong supporters of municipal light
plants. The Braintree light plant superintendent, Walther McGraf, is close to the
Senator.
• There are no regulations as to how members of a light plant board are chosen. The
members could be appointed by the BOS or the Town Manager or elected etc. The
manager of the light plant is appointed by the board and has the authority to sign
contracts.
• The Mass legislature and Supreme Court have given exclusive management of the
light plant to the plant manager and board. Therefore, the Board of Selectmen would
not have control over the plant. In fact, a municipality and its light plant are legally
seen to be so separate (because of having rate payers versus tax payers)that they
could, in fact, sue each other. 32 Mass Appeals Court 964 (1992)
• However, the municipality, not the light plant itself, controls the appropriations and
budget of the light plant. But TM has no jurisdiction over setting the electric rate
price. 348 Mass 266, Ch. 164 Sections 55-58. 426 Mass 1347
• The light plant is the employer for its employees, including collective bargaining
employees. It sets the employees' wages. MCR 29 JJ(Marblehead), 196 Mass 141
(Taunton). The municipality, however, is in control of the property insurance and
pensions. 344 Mass 133
• The bidding is the same as for the municipality The municipality owns the property
• Retail choice does not apply to the plant.
Peter believes the committee should setup a meeting with Morrissey, Bosley, and other
towns, like Braintree,Arlington, and Concord this summer. Ken will speak with his
committee about a joint meeting. He would also like load information from Lexington's
committee.
Next Stens
• The next meeting of the committee is on Wednesday June 12 at 7.30 p.m. in Room G-
15 of Town Hall.
• A legislative task force will meet on Thursday, May 30`h at 8:30 a.m.