Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1928 Planning Board Minutes 1928 PLANNING BOARD Frederick L. Emery J. Henry Duffy C. Edward Glynn William D. Milne Clarence H. Cutler Harry A. Wheeler PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass . January 3, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Cutler, Glynn and Milne. This was a joint meeting with the Board of Selectmen at the latter' s request . The present status of the work on the plans for the drainage and development of the Vine Brook areas south and west of the Centre was discussed and explained. The planning Board asked for an appropriation of $1500 to enable the engineers, Metcalf and Eddy,to complete their work on the project and to make a final engineering report in regard to it. The selectmen appeared to be agreeable to this appropria- tion and the matter was left in their hands . The views of the Planning Board with respect to the needs of the town and its boards for engineering service 111 were presented and the matter was discussed at some length in the presence of Messrs . Scammon and Cosgrove . The Board endeavored to convince the selectmen that there was need for a more generous provision and a definite policy in regard to the engineering de- partment along lines set forth in letter previously addressed to the selectmen. W. D. Milne , Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. Lexington, Mass . Janu- ry 10, 1928. Present : Messrs . Emery, Cutler, Duffy and Milne, also Engineer Cosgrove . There was a discussion of the status of the Lexington Park development resulting from an inquiry from the engineer respecting the present owners and that property as to the status of the lay-out of streets . It was found that the action taken by Griswold on the adjoining development had prejudiced the street location plan for the Lexington Park area, and it would be necessary to work out some scheme to harmonize these two developments . Mr . Griswold was asked to bring Mr. Bellamy, the engineer for Griswold, together with Branch, the engineer for the Lexington Park development and to scheme out a reasonable arrangement . Mr. Cosgrove exhibited sketch plan for a possible service street paralleling the railroad in the rear of the present town hall lot . He stated that these plans were prepared at the suggestion of the present owners of the town hall and adjacent properties and had not been reviewed by them. It is said that no information has been given by these parties as to their proposed development in this area. He was advised to get in touch with these parties and to secure from them a definite statement as to what they propose before spending his time in laying out possible schemes . The matter of a possible candidate for the vacancy on the Board left by Mr . r`reeman was discussed, but no action was taken other than to suggest that Mr . ' orthen be urged to resume his service with the Board. W . D. Milne, Clerk . PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass . February 6, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Glynn, Duffy, Cutler, Cosgrove and Milne . Mr. Neil McIntosh appeared with his Engineer Frost and plan for development of the Davis property on Bedford St . , the matter having been referred by the Selectmen to the Planning Board. After brief discussion Mr. Cosgrove was asked to prepare plan and topography of the entire area, Mr. Frost agreeing to furnish profiles of the brooks . Promise was made for prompt action as soon as the data was available . Captain Breed appeared to consult with the Board in regard to Kitson designed memorial for Hastings Park and seemed to desire the active support of the Board for the plan. It was voted to advise the Selectmen that the plan was acceptable in so far as it affected present or proposed streets, but to call attention to need for new provisions for drainage in the area if the memorial was built. There was discussion of the service street between Massachusetts Avenue and Railroad and Mr.Cosgrove was asked to prepare two sketch plans for basis of discussion with Seligman and others . There was brief discussion of Kirkegaarde scheme for street off Kendall and Middle Streets, but this matter had not been referred to the Board by the Selectmen. W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOA1D MEETING. Lexington, Mass . February 21, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Glynn, Cosgrove and Milne . The McIntosh Plan for development of the Davis property on Bedford Street was reviewed, the engineer having prepared a topographic plan of this tract. The McIntosh plan called for streets through the area per- pendicular to Bedford Street and 210 feet apart. The thought was expressed that frequency of intersections was undesirable and that it might be advisable to continue the general arrangement of streets as in the Lexington Manor area so that the main-ways would be parallel with Bedford Street. A tentative sketch plan was drawn so that this matter might be discussed. Mr . McIntosh and his engineer then appeared and Mr. McIntosh presented his reasons for opposing this scheme for streets parallel with Bedford Street . These reasons appear to be largely connected with. the ready salability of the lots . After discussion, it was pointed out that no well-defined plan had been prepared to show how the street system in the new area would be matched up with that in the Lexington Manor development, and it was accordingly voted to give the engineer an opportunity to prepare two plans for the street development of the entire area,- one based principally upon the original suggestion submitted by Mr . McIntosh. After discussion of the street proposed by Mr . Kirkbright parallel with Kendall Road off Middle Street, the Board voted in favor of the approval of such a plan if Mr . Kirkbright could secure the land and the agreement of owners of adjacent land through which the street would be projected. The meeting adjourned until February 28th. W. D. Milne , Chairman. 11 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. Lexington,Mass . March 19, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Glynn, Cosgrove and Milne . Absent: Mr . Cutler and Mr . ',Iheeler, new member . The new Board was organized with Mr. 7mery Chairman, and 'V. D. Milne, Clerk. The meeting was devoted to a review of matters pending and a discussion of work to be done . Mr. Cosgrove was asked to ascertain from the owners the status of the matters affecting the Bacon property. Mr . Cosgrove was asked to prepare data for revies of the situation as regards the building line on Mass . Avenue, East Lexington. Mr . Emery agreed to ascertain the action to be taken with regard to the appropriation for the completion of the engineer ' s report on the Vine Brook drainage project. It would seem essential that topography and other survey data be collected with respect to the area bounded by the Arlington line, Massachusetts Avenue, Maple and Lowell Streets . It was also pointed out that the completion of a street scheme on the higher land south of Massachusetts Avenue, East Lexington near the Nichols Estate be secured. The necessity for new lay-out affecting Grove Street was mentioned. W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD Lexington, Mass . A meeting was held May 1, April 24 and April 17 . Mr . Hartman, State Consultant, was present on April 17 and May 1 and there was discussion of various details of the present zoning by-law, particular attention being given to the minimum permitted size of lot, size of front, rear and side yards , the control of buildings on rear lots not directly fronting on streets and the advisibility of requiring a hearing and permit from the Board of Survey for the erection of semi-public and institutional buildings in the single-house zone and the establish- ment of certain nuisance occupancies in the business districts . At the meeting on May 2, the suggestion was received from Mr. Custance relative to the changing of the Parker and Foster Street area to a single- family zone, this being viewed with favor . No definite action was taken at any of these meetings . '!. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass . May 8, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Cutler, Duffy, Cosgrove and Milne . There was a discussion of a building line below Massachusetts Avenue and it was voted to recommend the establishment of a building line thirty feet distant from the northerly and easterly side of the Avenue from the Arlington line to the curve near Oak St . =ith a building line corresponding with the street line on opposite side of the street. Mr . Emery agreed to notify the Selectmen of this action. Meeting May 15. Present: Messrs . Emery, Cutler, Glynn, Cosgrove, Wheeler and Milne . Mr . Hartman was present to discuss proposed changes in zoning by-law and submitted draft of new sections governing size of lots in residential sections and calling for condition precedent for certain types of occu' ancy in both business and residential districts not now so limited. No formal action was taken at the meeting. Mr . Hartman was left to further refine the wording of his proposed clauses . The meeting adjourned to Monday May 21. W . D. Milne, Clerk. LEXINGTON, MASS. Planning Board Public Hearing June 25, 1928. A public hearing was held at 8 M. in the new Town Office Building, Lexington, Mass . in regard to change in the zoning by-law to change the existing two-family house district involving Parker St . , Forest St . , Muzzey St . , etc . between the Playground park area, Waltham St . and Massachusetts Avenue, to a single-family house district . The hearing was called after public notice of fourteen days, as required by the zoning by-law, had appeared in the Lexington Times Minute Man and was inserted by Assistant Town Clerk, Mrs . ':Ihittemore , who has the record. The meeting was called to order at 8.20 P.M. by "I . D. Milne , presiding, and C . E . Glynn, acting as clerk. No other members of the Planning Board were present. Seven citizens were present . On a call for showing hands, four citizens expressed themselves as favoring the proposed amendment of the by-law and one was opposed. Mr . Greeley, Mr . Bailey and Mr . Mitchell all spoke in favor of the amendment . Mr . Ferguson had a slight objection to the change and stated that he would not be personally affected. Mr . Hunneman also favored the change as did Walter Ballard. The hearing closed at 8.50 P.M. after arrangement had been made for the presentation of a motion under the article warrant for the town meeting and an informal gathering of the citizens present . W. D. Milne, Clerk. 111 PLANNING BOARD MEETING LEXINGTON, MASS. July 17, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Cutler, Glynn, Duffy, Milne and Engineer Cosgrove . The plan of land controlled by the Star Realty Trust and presented by Mr. Rowland was con- sidered, but in view of the fact that this party anticipated a considerable extension of the tract under development, the matter was left for Town Engineer and the owner' s engineer to prepare complete plan and topography of the whole area and submit the plan at a later meeting. Mr . Rowland was asked to furnish copy of the trust agreement, financial statement,and prospectus of the Star Realty Trust of which Carl ;,F. Johansen, is President,and whose office is at 19 Milk St. , Boston. The Planning Board voted as being not in favor of the erection of a filling station at Fottler Avenue and Massachusetts Avenue, or at any other location in that vicinity, and indicated its preference for stores at this location. On plan of Mr. Lewis Hunt for a street between Massachusetts Avenue and Slocum Road, the Board voted to ask Mr. Hunt to submit a lotting plan of this area. W. D. ISI i l ne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. Lexington,Mass . July 31, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Cutler, Milne and Cosgrove . The Board appeared before the Selectmen relative to the application of Prendergast Bros . for a filling station at corner of Fottler Avenue and 1..assachusetts Ave . , East Lexington. The sentiment was voiced that the Prendergast proposal to erect stores if the filling station permit was not granted was a threat . The Planning Board was generally opposed to the granting of filling station permit believing that the stores would not be erected. The promotors of the Star Realty Develop- ment near the Arlington line on Massachusetts Avenue presented nothing further and the Town Engineer had made little progress with them. The uncompleted business of the committee was reviewed and it was decided to push particularly the matter of building lines on Massachusetts Avenue, East Lexington. "I. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass . August 7 , 1928. Present: Messrs . _,mery, Duffy, iAlne and Cosgrove . Mr. Emery reviewed before the Selectmen a letter from the town counsel stating his views which were to the effect that the establishment of a building line on Massachusetts Avenue would result in damages equal to the value of the property between the building line and the street if damages resulted from litigation, and that the fixing of damages by prior agreement with the several parties would probably be good economy. Mr . Chamberlain of the Selectmen appeared and stated that the Selectmen had granted the permit to Prendergast Bros . for a filling station at corner of Fottler Avenue and Massachusetts Avenue with the privilege that all structures be thirty feet back from the sidewalk line and subject to release •on the part of Prendergast Bros . with respect to the area thirty feet back from the street in anticipation of the establishment of a building line . Mention was made of the application of the Rest Inn people for extension of their filling station plant on the opposite corner of F ottler Avenue . It was noted that this station is a non-conforming use in a residential district, but it is thought that it would be only fair to allow the extension of this privilege, and by means of a promise of this extension secure from the Hest Inn people the release with respect to the establishment of a building line thirty feet back from the present sidewalk line . There was discussion of the securing of the releases on other properties on the Avenue for establishment of this building line and a list of property owners was checked and assignments made to various members of the Board. Lr . Cosgrove was to get a correct list from the assessor ' s office and Mr. Emery was to prepare the release form to be used in af eeounsMention s JeJ of thesolicitationoioiiityyoi the l?osp a on tne ell ington Estate . W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass . September 13, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Cutler, Duffy, Glynn and Milne . The engineer' s report regarding the Vine Brook drainage project was reviewed and the ad- visability of providing a Planning Board preamble for it was discussed. Mr. Emery reported his further discussion of the project with Mr . Ryder, and indicated his feeling that it would be necessary for a development company to be formed by the Ryder interest in order that co-operation might guarantee to the town the betterments payments if the town undertook a work of such magnitude. It was felt that a report should more clearly develop the extent of the benefit of the drainage work beyond the immediate area reclaimed and available for building developments which the report indicated to be 185 acres . There was discussion of the doubtful possibility of an open channel design shown being possible between Vine Brook Road and Mass . Avenue, and it was suggested that this matter be reviewed further with the engineers . Mr. Emery felt that a further meeting with the engineers would be desirable and suggested certain arrangements . It later developed that it would be advisable if further meeting of the Planning Board be held on Monday September 17 at eight o' clock, at which the engineers' Mr. Raymond would be present . W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass . October 2, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Cutler and Milne . Copies of the engineer' s complete report on the Vine Brook drainage and development project was received. Copies were given to Messrs . Duffy, Cutler and Milne for further review . Discussion was chiefly on the proposed division of the zoning by-law, particularly on the limitation of individual lot sizes . Mr. Emery stressed the necessity for putting the amendments of the zoning law in shape for a town meeting to be held in November. It was proposed to amend the law to read to the effect that in all land hereafter laid out, each lot shall have a seventy foot frontage on the highway and an area of not less than 7000 sq . ft . , also that a side yard of not less than 10 ft. be required on each side of house and that a rear yard of not less than 30 ft . be provided, not over 30 per cent of which may be covered with accessory buildings . Mr. Duffy was quite insistent in his argument for a greater depth, but others present regarded 7000 ft . as the maximum in the way of a limitation which it would be expedient to try to secure . V 1�. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING LEXINGTON,MASS. October 26 and November 2,1928. These meetings were devoted to discussion of various sections of a new zoning by-law for the town, proposed to be presented to the town at a meeting to be held the latter part of November . W. D. I:`ilne, Clerk. AXt !tent '97.4011. 'resent 'Abeam. ?erg's 'line, Cutler rd - ' el ,SFr. has vas kield at the ":wn iiffioes on t e evening of 19LO after a luly published notice o: the ;r'opoatl to ek n:-e t o building Oy.li w. draft of the no' pro :.use(i eon!.rg by4 w )1 been prep'_ ed que4 *las distributed. (bout twont7.• three persons were iresent s s.i C7te entire proposed byiu.law was read a±x_ V1,C) vt r ioue sent z ons discussed. oue *Wootton developed on W.* _ 'u C of .r. 'ays.`..,h 11 her., the e requix nts for side.y rd.s insofar as t4..e7 af..aote t tho properties w!-ere lots were laid out _3rtar to the ai.ot'tton o: the zontne low. '. iturke c ; .r. - ointoph rased Quest!ons 1:1 regar,., to t' a sic* of get l state sicno wmatto4. •o toi"tl oallod ettentton to tyn 4ppprent prohibition o. enpo' ry reel-ost*te olfi.aes on now dovelornent. • 1.Vtit+nno i . Jan On ;`x. ., . .'utter !,-, �tsent ld t' it v".c, o in recArd to t.'xe rropobed lot sizes of Ino ` sq«ft. ' tt=ke 7Z-') ft, frontsce. x'. Johnson =.nu .,v. "oIntoth felt tLt thls ft harttsLtps but it rens.+r l the Hooting mewled to favor this provision. Hearing on Amendments to Zoning By-Law, held at Parker School, North Lexington, Monday, December 3rd, 1928. Present : Chairman F.L. Emery C.E.Glynn. The Hearing was called to order at 8.05 P.M. Chairman Emery read the Amendments proposed, explaining in detail the purposes and what was hoped to be accomplished by the changes. 4€-p. 3 Mr. Jas. H. Russell spoke in favor of defining the limitations of)n the C-1 District referred to in paragraph I, cpage 8 to conform to the intent of the original by-law. He claimed at the proposed amendment extends the limits of this C-1 District. Mr. White spoke in favor of the provisions of Section 6. Mr. Johnson referred to the success of developments by Mr. McPhee off Reed Street, where no lot had less than 60 ft . frontage, or contained less than 7500 ft. Mr. H.H. Johnson voiced a general objection to the limitations proposed by Section 6. Mr. McIntosh asked the Chairman for an explanation of his statement that the McIntosh developments were a liability to the Town on account of causing increased tax rates. Mr. John F.Fleming asked what effect the amendments would have on lots now existing, and was informed by the Chairman that lots laid out prior to the adoption of the amendments would not be affected thereby. Mr. G.j.Bean spoke in favor of limiting the frontage to 60 ft. instead of 75 ft. under Section 6, claiming that the developer cannot find a ready sale for lots with the greater frontage. Mr. McIntosh under reference to Sectin 10, asked what would be the effect on a mortgagee of a non-conforming structure in case 50% or over of such structure were destroyed. Lexington, ' nes, Present: _,{essrs. '_mery, -°ilne, Cutler tnd ' heeic r. hearing was held at the Toon Offices on t?)o evening of Decenber : , 1928 after a duly published notice of the proposal to change the building ay-law, draft of the no.r proposed zoning by-law had been pre p°a2ed .and tics distributed, rq,ou t twenty- three persons were present and the entire proposed by-law was read and. the various sections discussed. .,ome objection developed on the nn.rt of -4r. ;tarah.all :hen the requirements for side-yards insofar as they affected the properties where lots were .aid out prior to the adoption of the zoning law. z . aiurke and ';r, rcIntoah raised questions +.n regard to t °e size of real-estate signs permitted. 'r, 7cIntosh called attention to an apparent prohibition of temporary real-eatate offices on new development, •z�. n.1Kdman, r . John on 2,11d `+r, Cutter presented their vwewe in regard tm the proposed lot sizes of 7500 sq.ft. with 75 ft, frontage, Mr, Johnson -Lnd r. `'ointosh felt that this would work a hardship, but in gener<..1 the meeting seemed to favor this provision, .l « Milne, Clerk. Lexinfton, ''ass. Present: -'essra. "`msry, Chairman, ''hee1Fr Rams). hearing was held ..t the ?o3n Offices at 8 '. December 10 1928 on the petition of L?onald .hea to amend the zoning by-law to create a bu;;iness district at his property at 117-119 etc, 'l assachusetta Avenue, ast ...xtngton. There were some thirty people present. Thomas , . Cull- a apiieared for Oonalgo` ea. but presented. no reason shy this petition shoul brI , vor_ably regarded than those which had been presented by previous attorneys for r, hes at two previous hearings. Various people spoke in opposition,and on the call for votes it aper mored that practically the entire attendance was opposed to the creation of any more business district it this neighborhood for whatever purpose. .P. :'ilne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass . Saturday, December 15,1928 . Present: ILessrs. Emery, Glynn, Duffy, Cutler, Wheeler and Milne . The meeting was devoted to a further discussion of the details of the proposed amendment to the zoning by-law, particular attention being given to matters concerning lot sizes in present developed districts and in new districts . The definition of term "street" is used in the by-law to control all buildings on rear lots and the demolition clause affecting non-conforming buildings damaged by fire . Adjourned at 12 .15 a .m. i. U. Milne, Clerk. or 77 i"or The Year T'nding December . 1, 1928. The 11anning board has continued the practice f advising the Joard of :.Jurvey upon their request, in the matter of new lr.nd and street developments and has given specific consideration to the follm.ing ::ratters: Star healty Co. development,near Sylvia `t., rast Lexington. !IcIntosh development, Tedford :>t.,Nort!, Lexington, Nickerson development, ,. perces' Bridge. Building lines on °!assachusetts • ve .,t'ast Lexington. Hunt developrnent,near .locum hd. , Lexington. (riswold development, North Lexington. Lexington i-ark development, North Lexington. Bean development, (''etherbee 'ark) , Bedford t. , North Lexington. ...treet neer Kendall :toad for L. Kirkbright. The Board during the year held formal hearings upon the following subjects: Proposed changes in the zoning law to include in the single family dwelling district all the area between 'tassachusetts venue, altham `=t, and the : rark and Playground area, except that zoned for business, this area having originally been zoned as an R2 or tt:o_ family dwelling district. This change was adonted by the Toan. `'etttion of Donnld bee to a*::end the zoning law to create a :usiness district at 117-119,etc. "assachusetts `venue, Fast Lexington. The Board. has not recommended this change . 'roposed general revision of the zoning law. The 10 and has spent much time in the study of the i-orkings of the present zoning law and has proposed amendments tending to clarify it :nd to more effectively secure for the citizens those benefits .which were sought nhen the law was created. 'hue the proposed amendments in some instances increase the restrictions upon real est. te develop-lents, for the most part they are designed to bring the law into conformity with similar laws elsewhere and to en•.:ble the to :n more effectively to control its development and to avoid the introduction of inimical conditions possible under the present law. :'our public hearings .sere eld in various sections of the town in regard to these proposed amo aents . The gener%1 *+atter - 2 - report of the Planning Board. has now been referred by the Town to a committee of ten citizens appointed by the , electmen who are to serve in conjunction with the Planning Board and who ore to rt-port at a later torn meeting. The Board has continued its study of the development of the large low areas in the Vine Brook drainage basin mouth and west of the center, involving important considera- tions with respect to general drainage, park development, and streets for through traffic, and has had frequent meetings with the engineers, etcalf and ',.ddylwho have been employed in this connection. The rc-port of these engineers in regard to the drainage problems, the soil and other conditions, and upon the subject of betterments in this and adjoining areas is now in hand and the study of the whole is continuing. The Board favors more rapid progress in the matter of establishing proper and wider lines on the m;,ny old and narrow to:n ways, in order that the building of houses may not further imp it the opportunity for securing sightly 1.nd safe streets without excessive future exrence. The i oard, as previously, favors an improved organization of the Town engineering service hich ill permit of the establishment of a coherent policy and plan for the extension of the public facilities, sewers, water mains, streets, etc. on a broad economic basis, and at the same time rrovide for prompt gat 'ering of the engineering data necessary for the solution of immediate problems of development as well as those of tho future . .fespect.:=illy submitted,