Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Planning Board Minutes, Volume 1, 1918-1930.pdf
19J8 PLANNING BOAFI; Frederick L. Emery Christopher S. hyan S. Louis Barbour Howard S. 0. Nichols Fred S. Piper Edward T . Hartman ADJOURNED TOWN nETI NG March 11, 1918 Art . 26. Creation of Planning Board On motion of Jay 0 . Richards, it was voted "That a Planning Board be created in accordance with Chapter 283 of the Acts of 1914 and amendments thereto, said Board to consist of six member, two members to be elected for the term of one year, two members to be elected for the term of two years and two members to be elected for the term of three years, and annually hereafter in the month of March two members shall be 111 , elected for the term of three years ." Vote passed unanimously at 7:47 P. M. L=GTC1 m -r P�..A I_.G 3C:i D At the to; n m,,eti ng of March 11, 1915 , the town elected a l,inni:ic- board cc: ose,i. of the .7_' 1o'• ina ner:bers : For cu Frederick 1 . Lmer j , • S . Ryan For t%,o ear;; 3 . Lewis Barbour Hoy ard_ :3 . C . i;ichols For Three tars Fred :, . Piper and 7 . Hartman =U71:5' l- , CT 7.HE L: XI GTC.i27 tG BOARD April. 2, 1915 . Messrs . Barbour, T ierj' , Hartman `nd Piperr, in answer to o c-11 from the Board of Select/nen acpeared of the To4,.0 Hall ,3nd the oath of office as members of the To, n 21anninf• Board :as administered off: the ' o, n The 3oerd or- gani - ed e1;-,c; in- s c;: irYn^n Frederick 1 . Tier-, , Pc secre`ar- .:_ art. T . H _•t n . Various matters ;were dis- cu c a , m? rl `-. ith reference to the po ers of the Board , its relationship to other i ovn boards , clic it , as Voted: To i ,vite roDr:',oc?•:.{;:ntives frci the Board of ..iu.rvey and the Park Boer d to ';Vi=e t lth the Ply nnic Board as rF .; 12.1""1' es pos ' lid e and tic''l ar1l' when T-Int; fec` in' • t .e '_�r e t>:'lelYu. 'wore under cont ideretion . Ld,•ard. T . dartrr.an, aecrPtary April 2Z , 1518 . \ There were ereent ]mere- , B^.rbo,,r , Riper , T'ichols arid. Har t-.7L , together ,;i.th ton er:_•ineer Duf fev Rir; ar 's re ,r E"sP.._ti fir" the Board o ._ :;urve: . The Board dis- cussed the lay-out of .Loc ivenue Cl e 't" 1..;iG_.. , ' l.e pro- posed ce'r,eter:- , the (_-,-stio i of to n ]E o , i1C tire of the p ift o s of th,= to , n . Voted.: To -: k the ce,-et-,r`, -or ittee to YYeet t,ith the Plan-in- Board tc cciic i(.er the d'eveloo rent of the. ce"etery as ';er vote of the to.Jn . Voted.: To ask the ..r cret=�ry to c.o : ;a at l-n('._ccaa )e architects with refer -nee to the lf y-out of the ce eter-- . At the r`=( ' r', t of _• • . Richard, the pi o oos ed rngat e Pa. sa- chuL e -c Aver:Liar- f1 . Vine Brook ,c iui d ere;? ,f:‘, 1-10, it , a6 To ask Daniel Cerucci, vho propose., to build the ;,G :_n•-et .ith the Board at the next T!ee,tinP• to dis- cuss the situation. To ed 7oiirn to .aonday ,, April , 8 P .M. EC.vard T . Hssrtanan, Secretary 4 April 29 , 19] 8 . .� There were present :lessrs . Emery, Piper , Barbour , T;ichols , Ryan and Hartman, v,ith Ir . Cerucci, .Tessrs . Scammon and Richards of the Board of Survey and Tovn n Engineer Duffey . The situation in repard to the proposed enrage on assachus etls A� enue and Vine Brook and the development of the land beck of the site v.as considered at length and it vias Voted: To ask the Board of Serve,; to have made a survey of Vine Brook to Jaltham Street and of the other branch of Vine Brook to its sources and on to the state road so as to €dive a proper idea of where the main u ays should run. Voted: To advise Mr . Cerucci of this action and ask hien to hold his plans for iurthsr detielopments . The Board then discussed the development of the new cemetery end it viva., Voted: To ask the Secretary to consult 1:r . Arthur Shurtleff with a view to ascertaining the possibility of securing hil , as consulting landscape architect with someone else to carry out the detailed development of the site . Voted: To adjourn to May 9 , at rhich meeting the cemetery committee is to be asked to �~eet v.ith the board . Ldward T . Hartman, Secretary 5 October 15, 1915 . IILlIINGTON PLA1t1fING :BOARD Responding to an invitation from the Board of Survey the entire planning board met with the Board of Survey' to consider the taking of land for a street running westerly from Massachusetts Avenue along Vine brook. The board was polled on the question and with the exception of lug'. Ryan there was adreement that the taking should be made so as to hold the water way for sewer purposes , also to give access to the land behind which would otherwise have no satisfactory outlet to Massachusetts Avenue. IIThe Board was interested also in a presentation vby Mr. Horton with a view of usinL the taking as a portion of a parkway wliich would ultimately connect with Waverly Oaks and possibly with other park centers. f4 r ‘Lf Lexington Planning Board . November 4, 118 . There were present all the members of the Board ex- cept T:r .Hyan, also Mes ,rs . Scamman, 'Richards and Duffy After extended consideration of the question of ex- "Th tending and accepting hocust Ave . it was decided to postpone definite action until the selectmen reported on the exact form of the original motion. The remainder of the meeting was devoted to the need and method of develo-ning a town map and the lay-out of the town's main ways . No definite action was taken. T .T.H';rtman, Secretary Lexington y 1enninP Board Dec .9 , 1918 . There were present : essrs .T-nery, TTichols , Piper, -z rbnu.- , rid T7artman . voted: The the Planning.- Borrd f vors the p=assage of bills already in craft form to put into effect the con- stitutional amendments on districting or zoning of cit- ies snd on billboards ^nd to rec ue: t the Secretary to notify the Senator and Representative representing Lex- irlPton. Voted; in recommend to the Board o f Survey the establish- ment stabli h-ment of building lines on Muzzy Street and to make the Chairman and :Tr .B` rbour a sub-committee to confer with the Board o f Survey on the matter . Voted; fn advise : r .CTreely in answer to h7s letter of 11 November 8 thot ' he Board out d commend the purchase of the Keeley Institute lot by citizens to be held nor the purpoue of promoting the best development of +-re town, s.ith no t, n'ency on the o?rt o f the loard to advise its u: e for town purposes . Voted: Tit ' he Chairman ask 'Tr .1.t .Ballard to seek a long time option on the old Lumber yard property with a view lo r curanP it for a town yard. PLANNING BOARD REPORT FOR 1918 The Planning Board organized on April 2, 1918, and be- tween this date and the close of the year held twelve meetings, eight of which were joint meetings with the Cemetery Committee . Numerous informal meetings of various members of the Board have been held. Upon a number of occasions members of the Board of Select- men, Board of Survey and Park Board have met with the Planning Board , and upon other occasions members of the Planning Board have met with other Boards . The principal work of the Planning Board has been in connection with the Cemetery Committee, serving as a joint board under vote of the Town to lay out the new cemetery. At the time the Planning Board was established, the Town assigned to it in co-operation with the Cemetery Committee the task of securing plans for the development of the new cemetery. Owing to the demands of this work, the Board has naturally given to the Cemetery project the major portion of its time . Leetings of the joint committee , conferences, interviews, visits to ceme- teries in this vicinity and elsewhere have been very nearly con- tinuous with the result that a report will soon be ready. Plans are nearing completion, and it is hoped that a full report with Plan of the proposed lay-out and draft of rules and regulations for handling the matter may be in the hands of the citizens prior to the annual town meeting. It is expected that the plan of development willbe at that time sufficiently complete to enable the Town, provided it accepts the same, to take definite action looking toward actual work of construction. Aside from the fact that the work upon the new cemetery has taken the major part of the Board 's time and attention, it is to be remembered that the Planning Board is a new one with no traditional or well-defined lines laid down for its work. The inevitable result has been to require time to feel out the situation which confronts the Town, and to determine to what line or lines the Board could best devote its time and effort . The Board is without any real power in connection with any matter, and must content itself with recommendations and suggestions to be put into effect by the Town, and while numerous matters having to do with the welfare of the Town as the Board conceives it have been considered and gone into to considerable extent, it seems wise at the present time not to dwell upon matters that at present can only be considered as possibilities . At the very outset of its work, the Planning Board en- countered the necessity for an adequate map of the Town, and until such a map can be produced, very little of real value can be accomplished in the intended line of activity of a Planning -2- Board . Lexington has large areas of undeveloped land, - farms that were once operated but are now in the market for develop- ment . These areas will go to haphazard, cheap development, each area to be developed upon a plan largely its own and without due regard to the development of adjoining areas, unless they be considered as a whole, laid out with proper reference to the topography and served by a comprehensive system of roads. The Boardof ourvey, upon whom devolves the responsibility for im- proving development layouts, cannot properly pass upon the same and should not be charged with responsibility therefore in the absence of a proper and sufficient plan of the Town. New lines of highway should be developed to relieve the traffic on I,:assachusetts Avenue and to open up outside areas, but here again, nothing can be done without a Town map. The Planning board urges with all possible emphasis the necessity for immediately providing for such a map. The Town Engineer is doing what he can in this direction, but with the force at his command and other duties devolving upon him must necessarily require a long time in its preparation. In our opinion, a special appropriation is justified to increase the engineer ' s force to enable him to make immediate progress to this end. The duties of Planning Boards, as specified in the law, are "To make careful studies of the resources, possibilities and needs of the Town, particularly with respect to conditions which may be injurious to the public health or otherwise in- jurious in and about rented dwellings, and to make plans for the development of the municipality with special reference to the housing of its people ." The Homestead Commission and the Federation of Planning Boards both point out the importance of a town map, topographical and showing existing streets , railways, parks and undeveloped land, as a basis for a creful study of future developments ; and that the board should forecast developments needed at least fifty years in advance of any given time . ouch developments should be , when adopted by the Town, laid down on the map as the basis of procedure . It is further pointed out that it is the absence of such planning, and the foresight it brings into play, which is re- sponsible for the chaotic conditions so generally found. In practically every other respect we find careful planning in ad- vance . Municipal development is the exception, where accident or the interests of a developer dictate what is to rule the Town for good or ill for centuries. ie plan our homes , which have a comparatively short life . '; e have left to chance the laying out of our streets, which last practically forever. l,hen an old established street is changed it is at a frightful cost . -3- The foregoing sets forth the general purposes of a Plann- ing Board . No one can dispute the wisdom of the course outlined. The Board hopes, without any power of its own, that it can justify its continued existence by the wisdom of its suggestions, plans and activities . Respectfully submitted, FREDERICK L. EMERY, EDWARD T. HARTMAN, CHRISTOPHER S. RYAN, HOWARD S. O. NIC HO L S. 1919 PLANNING BOARD S. Louis Barbour Christopher S. Ryan Howard S. 0 . Nichols Fred S. Piper Edward T . Hartman 'Milan R. Greeley ITINUTES OF THE LEXINGTON PLANNING BOARD, MARCH 11 , 1919 . There were present :Messrs .Nichols , Greeley, I?:;an and Hartman, ,rich I:Mr.Emery in consultation. The 1110 board organized by electing 'ir .Greeley chairman and ?Ir .Hartman Secretary . The Locust Ave .Extension was discussed at length and it was voted to approve the recommendgtion of the selectmen acting as a board of survey in regard to re-locating Locust Ave and accepting an extension thereof. ADJOURNED TOWN MEETING March 17, 1919. Art . 37. On motion of Jay 0 . Richards, it was voted that the Selectmen be and are hereby authorized to accept from the Boston and Maine Railroad a deed conveying to the Town a parcel of land located in front of the railroad station and commonly known as Depot hark, said land to be used for Park purposes only, with the condition that should the land be required for railroad purposes in Lexington, the town shall deed this land bac'c to the railroad upon payment by the railroad to the Town of a sum of money equal to what the Town would have received in taxes if the property had remained in the possession of the railroad, said sum to be based on the assessment of the year 1918. tes of the Lexington Planning Board, April 29 ,1919 There ere ire ,'r.t ::es.rs Greeley, Berborr and the secretary. 410 Voted: To ask the Chairman to consult ::"r .Blake in re- gard to The donation of a piece of land to properly develop the conjunction of Somerset Road, ::lerriam Street , etc . There was a lengthy discussion of the question of building laws for the purpose of protecting the town from injurious building developments and of pro- tecting buyers from speculators . This question the Board agreed to take under ivo consideration. It was the sense of -he Board that an effort 11 should be made to work out a scheme for securing the Gaut Lexington mersh and adjoining lands through an investment club . It was the sense o i' tl e Board that it should pre- pare a general statement in regard to its func`ions, , what ground it should cover and the rain fields of its usefulness . Among the items mentioned were a town map, developed with special ref rence to topogl aphy, the development of th'_s topography through street lay-outs , etc . , zoning, housing regulations , taxation, town ex- 411 penditures by business-like methods , and one organiza- tion of public interest in the public development of • the town. It v, s felt that such local groups as the Board of `s'rade , the Co-operative Bank, and an invest- ment com it ' ee or club which should be organized, ould be of material S rvice . 111 Voted: To r= cor^1,ezid to t_ne town that the road at the base of Mt .Tabor be named lit .Tabor Road provided the town of Lincoln will co--operate by giving the same name to the portion of 'rhe road in Lincoln. Lexington Ilanning Board, June 21, 1)157 . Present - Greeley, Ryan, Ilichols , Piper, Hartman . A letter from the Lincoln Selectmen agreed to the proposal in regard to the name of the road at the base o - ; t . Tabor, and it was agreed to present dihe name to the nexp toad meeting. Voted - To recommend a curve following Vine Brook,for st-r pet entering from lassachusetts Ave . into the Cerucci property, .and to refer it to the board of Survey. After discussion of the problem of unsatisfactory de- velopments, nov. under way, it WT.5 Voted , To ask the board of trade, the co-operative bank, the trust company, the savings bank and the East Lexington improvement association to meet with the planning board on June 26 for a discus.-ion of the -:problem. PLANNING BOARD MEETING August 13, 1919 All members were present, together with h':essrs . Richards, Duffy and Jackson in consultation. The meeting was called to consider the proper site for a Town Hall, a bequest for one having been received by the town. Several sites were appraised and, owing to the need for a prompt decision in regard to the present site in conjunction with the Keely Institute lot, it was VOTED:- That the board is of the opinion that the present site is inexpedient . The reasons were transmitted to the Selectmen and are appended hereto . August 14, 1919. To the Selectmen of Lexington: The Planning Board, acting on the request of your board, has considered the proper site of the proposed town hall and begs to report that it voted to recommend against the use of the present site in conjunction with the adjoining lot . Points in favor of the present site : - The location is convenient to the center of activities . Points against the present site : Not a good setting for a desirable public building or for one of a memorial nature , The location is noisy and dusty, It is on land too near the business center, therefore valuable for business purposes, A desirable form of architecture would not harmonize with the adjoining buildings, present and probable, There would be no space for proper setting, for park- ing automobiles , or for future development . A building of the nature desired should be located where it can be seen, and where it will have the possibilities mentioned under the second heading. The proper setting for prominent pub- lic buildings is on a park or other open space , or on the axis of a prominent thoroughfare . The Planning Board is actively canvassing the possibilities and will hope , as soon as may be necessary, to be ready to advise as to the best site for the purpose . The question is one of great importance to the proper future convenience and development of the town, and it is with this in mind that the Board will give it its best attention. This report is sent at this time because of the necessity of an early decision on the desirability of the present site . Respectfully submitted, FACTORS ITS LOCATION OF TOWN HALL 111 1. General effect on the Town. 4 It will improve the Town most if it is located where it has the handsomest and most congenial surroundings and can be seen by both townspeople and visitors. It should not be used, however, as the means of securing the des- truction of an existing eye-sore . 2. helation to future development of Town. (a) Should not be boosted in midst of future business sec- tion as it can have no assured relation to new business buildings , withdraws too much valuable property from taxa- tion, and interrupts the proper growth of the business centre , :Jew England villages usually have public buildings grouped in some central location. Lexington has two distinct villages . The Hall could form a part of a civic centre in the larger village . (b ) Should be conspicuous , in order to have the greatest effect on the general character of the Town ( see 1) . ( c ) Should be convenient . Should be so located as to serve the townspetbple with the least inconvenience . The town officers , such as collector, treasurer and clerk shoul be accessible . The population centre of Lexington is shifting rapidly toward the 73ast Village so that a loca- tion near the centre of population would carry the Hall well out of the Centre Village . This is undesirable , as it would then be only measurably convenient to either village . A site somewhere near the main village would probably be practically as convenient to the ;past Village and a great deal more convenient to the Centre . Convenience i. s becoming more and more an elastic quality as transportation methods improve , and does not limit the location within narrow bounds, as in moibrless days . 3. Relation to its immediate neighborhood. ( a) Immediate surroundings should be safeguarded and should promise if possible congenial development in the nature of a civic centre, or group of future public buildings. (b) Should not be a single structure unrelated to its future neighbors. This is a discredited idea and has given place to a wider apereciation of the advantages of well- grouped buildings. Theoretically, at is possible group commercial and public buildings into one harmonious com- position, ,ut practically the public is unable or unwill- ing to con.rol private development . -2- In any case , the best result comes from grouping buildings that are related in purpose . In Lexington this means grouping with some existing buildings or else getting land enough to permit, of other new buildings . ( c ) Should dominate the groups of which it is one . Ai^ong business buildings in a business district it may be completely eclipsed by taller commercial structures , like Carpenters Hall , Philadelphia, or the Watertown, raltha.m or Stoneham Town Halls. ( d ) Need not be adjacent to town yard for sewer, water and street departments. 4. Relation to lot. (a) Should have room for parking motor cars, for second- ary exits and for ample lawn, ( unless it is decided to build it directly on the street) . (b) Should be placed in such a way as to provide for future grouping with other buildings , or extension of this building. 5 . We of lot . Building might easily need to cover an area 125 feet wide and 175 feet deep . The Arlington Town Hall is larger than this, and Braintree slightly smaller. Tewksbury, wi thv59 ,000, is covering 90 x 120. A good lawn in front would require that the front of the build- ing be at least 50 feet from the street line . The present Hall is 25 feet . Minimum parking space, or at least a fair passage in rear of building, would make probable required depth -- 50 - 175 - 25 -250 ft. 1,1idth need not be greatly in excess of building if neighboring property is safeguarded. See diagrams of lots and schedule of dimensions of Town Halls. Ivo site appears ideal, and therefore the procedure must be to weigh advantages and disadvantages. 1---' 0 Pc+ 0 3 Li 'xi c2 0 . P CD i3`nc•c+ W tD c+ +, P 1-4• .c�.. ca.-~ 0 I11 0 m 0 0 o 0 i'! 0 0 ..1 : 1-40 N 9 P Pi ID , :r ; 3 •Ti 0 0 4ZS4� (1 ) Location should be conspicuous and where it will add , 9, 2 ri',, o ,; o beauty of town for visitors as well as for tow-nspeo4e. ¢' '��•" s LJ (Q) Should not be in such relation to surroundings that tj wb Wio --.; 0 nearby present or future buildings can injure it. gi o PHI-4 o 0 0 0 ti �!a LA (3 ) Should be convenient for voters taking train in •O t's.J morning � .•.:` 0� 0 0 1-,-.4 ID i-, 0 0 f 0 OBJ M• 0.0 0 4�1 „ ,.. , ( ' P.4.1-4-'i 4 '' 9 / c+ ;+ I 1 (4 ) Should be cor er ie.'. ;, for t.:•ansaetio i of daily � . ",:d .;ak.a i P i 1.iry.G"a` o : %" '.+ 3 ' .,;,:9 o .1, C o 0 6. Z. 0 C. o f u,O ,1-k i"' 0, (5 ) Shoult�. .,c yonvenient to East and Nortn Villages -o. 4 t�x�a n ` t.7):J r:-.710 c,t .` 0 0 '7: ilf rs. 0 L i !2 O C 001 jiI .L...�., (6 ) Should be convenient to as 1ai•ge a number of people ::'17)..,) O`W ") h-+ 0a -e 0 0 �m 0 PI il, c • as possible on foot. o O 0 u p6o ,F+• u. 7 ) Should have room for f .tu.r. e civic centre of well- b3-r W.1t-0 �d W 0 grouped iublic buildings. P O x 0 0 00 ; 1171 It (8) Shouir: not be ci ovvded up close to street like present ,� J .:!� 1r�, o ' hall , but have room for ample lawn in front. 0.� 0 p 0 i 0 ca '"D 0 ).' C _' 1.4 0 . 9 «t IP. ' H a, c1--, cf (9 ) It should not be so located as to withdraw large ; Y1 0.! .. 0 0 M 4�_valuecin property, _ res rt or future, from taxation. :i! 93 N c3 49:C O o 0 -, ,1 c NJ a 0 0 ) concealed r 1'•1 S T 1 Y^l (ti 7w• +"1 (i�} Should not be f_ o: . ,.,���. �:� East a,..,�roa.c,h ;,j � o � 0� oil razz;z;, ��,_�0. l .'t1 O iv CTD P. r 1u 0, 0 N. i..�. CJ 0 0 10 (11 ) Should not be close to both steam and electric c) 0 o roads at noisy points. pa0Ho,10 ' . a.G (12 a Should not be in a style foreign to Lexington, but P i� o 2 0 0 0 0 shoal., ? , amid c. r" ' cN o 0 p ,o t) O be Colonial �. lu N.-.rr. �.n,.�in�,. f•.�vora.ble to t �a�,, s�°le, s�.�.��-s 9 rte. moi",'.) Snould not injure airy existing or future function t -� or feature of the t �-, p ^� o town.. s 9 9 o ` . Ems. E The board met on August 18 and 29 and on September 16 with a joint--committee to consider the site for the proposed town hail . Meeting of October 10, 119 . Present: Greeley, Ryan, Piper, Hartman. The board considered the question of the proper de- velopment and protection of the 3,ast Lexington flats and agreed to definitely ascertain the attitude of the town of Arlington, which owns the property. As soon as possible the board agreed to have the matter brought before the voters for action. voted: To advise that the town obey the law in regard to guide posts, R. L. , Chap. 52, Sections 1, 2 and 3. Voted: That it is the sense of the borrd that the interests cilf the town and the work of the board would be advanced by the promotion of a town newspaper . LEXIP,GTOI PLA.i:17cc BC =:D ::EETI I. O November 6 , 1919 . 'Phare were nresnt Messrs . Greeley, Nichols, end the Secretary, with Engineer Duffey in coni erence . On October 31st, the Planning Board met with citizens of the Town and Manrger Pollock of the Boston and Maine Railroad , regarding the situation at the LexinMtor_ Station. After conference with Mr. Pollock and President Hudson of the Road , it was found it would not be expedient to take any action which would lead to a considerable expenditure of the road to prevent people from entering from Merriam Street , v, ere the accidents usually occur . The euestionE of the Locust Avenue extension and the East Lexington .:'lets, were discussed and it was agreed to take the matter or the Locust Avenue extension up at the next meeting, with details to be supplied by the Town Engineer . A letter to the Board from rr.ncis H . f-7olmes was reed and it was TOTED - To refer the letter to 2r . E. Taylor, :'ire Commissioner , end to notify the writer. VOTED - To ask the Secretary to c.rite to the Arlington Board of Public ':'dorks in regard to their sentiments concerning the East Lexington Plats , and our desire in the matter, and to state that we would be glad to confer with the Beard to see ,:hat may be done . VCT7,D - To establish the following sub-committees of the Planning tsoara. On street names - Dr. Wiper Cr. zoning - Hartman Cn building laws - Hartman Revision of Ton departments - Barbour On Town newspaper - Nichols On cooperation with Park Department-Greeley - 2 - 410 VOTED - To write a letter to the Selectmen asking whether the purchase of the Keeley Institute property by citizens of the Town was made with the under- stpnding that the site was favored ac a location for the new Town Hall, and whether the action of the Planning 3oard in thiconnection was made known to the purchasers . Engineer Duffey cal] ed attention to the fact that it was possible to get around the ;Board of purvey act by going to the Land Jourt and getting approval for a specific layout . :1r. Duffey said that the subdivision of the interior areas is a Land Court function. this seems to point to a con 'lict of ailthority. 2.4, (4rq. 46euti 044 -t )5e-1 0-0- 4 of 7fee.,ta /9f9, turd f.,.„00 Igor c d o , 44 0 i-zr,a t t m:ye Alitze44,e1-4 62241 Report of the Lexington Planning Board for 1919 . IIPThe Planning Board feels very much gratified because of the acceptance by the Town of the plans for the development of the new cemetery which it had a part in "ormulating. In- dications are that this cemetery will mark an era in cemetery developrneut . The detail work of the year consists of a number of small items . Among them are the Following:- The board called to the attention of the town clerk the fact that the important chapter dealing with apartments and other tenements was omitted from the last edition of the build- ing law. This chapter prevented the construction of a cheap apartment house in the center of. the Town. Yet through fail- ure to publish it the Town misleads builders and makes itself liable . The entire law should be forthwith published. It assisted in laying out lines dor future street develop- ment in the vicinity of Vine Brook Road from LIassachusetts Avenue to Waltham Street . The board made a careful study of the proposed site for a new town hall and reported as a board against the present site and to the same affect when acting as a part of the joint committee on the question. The Town referred to the board the question of the name for the road et the base of I;It . Tabor and after advising with the selectmen of Lincoln the board recommended the name "Mt . Tabor Road" . 110 It presented to the board of survey a scheme for replanning the junction of Merriam Street , _:franklin Road and Somerset Road. It called a meeting of bankers and explained the need of con- structive co-operation in housing development to supplement the effect of the building law, which is negative in its nature and cannot secure positive results . It conferred with the general manager of the Boston and Maine Railroad on improvements at the railway station, and submitted lilans which t:o man? er approved, c„ti, iAr.l- to +110 nprrovsol o i Yeo railroad administration. It recommended to the selectmen that the main ways of the Town be properly marked with guide posts in accordance with the law. The board has been at work on the problem of the East Lexing- ton marsh, but the matter develops slowly because of the reorgan- ization of the state boards . The interests of the metropolitan district and of the town would be advanced by flooding the marsh and by surrounding it with a driveway so that the breeding of mosquitoes might be stopped, and the water area and park development added to the amenities of the town . The board has considered the question of its functions and, in close agreement with the opinions manifested at the annual meet- ing of the _'ederation of Planning Boards on December 12th, it feels that any problem affecting the future development of the town should receive its careful attention. The history of the boards in the 4 . state shows that it is a rapidly growing custom to refer matters 110 to the boards for study. The recommendations in such instances receive acceptance or rejection in proportion to the efficiency with which the work is done . This probably offers the best avenue of activity at the present time and your board is at all times glad to co-operate along these lines in any way it can. Respectfully submitted , Dec . 26, 1919 . 1920 PLANNING BOARD �':lilliam R. Greeley Christopher S. Fyan Fred S . Piper Edward T . Hartman J. Odin Tilton henry L. "!adsworth LET.ITTG'"C?T PL'JTV ITTC -3012D. January 29 , 1920. here vverd .,.essr 6 . LTreele„ nai ,oelec cinan 'Oster, Town Ung•ineer nu fy. The cuestion of the consolidation of Peirce 's T3ridge and the East Lexington Stations was considered 1n ^oniTmr't1 er «.r7 1-" cuestions o " a new station at Lexington and the abolition o' grade crossings throughout the town. After consideration of the vccious problems involved , it was voted to ask the Secretary to e,rite to the Board o" Selectmen pointing out three principles . 1 . 7o actio,. should be taken rnd if noss3_bl e n_othinp done unti 1 s scientific study hrs been made o ' the :thole situc.tion and, as -'ar =s possible , a coherent system and method or procedure de', eloped so th't as each individual sten 1s trken it may be ef- fective to lards the comprehensive -;thole . 2 . As bearing upon this, the future characteristics of rail{vaservice Pre important . Present evidence indicate. that future service l',:11l co.asi . t olig ter or shorter units and therefore more _frecuent trains . I this is true , more numerous stations are the only logical outcome . There Fro- lel be a station at Lexington, one beteen Lexington and Munroe , the .!lunroe Sta- tion, Peirce 's Bridge Station end East Lexington Station, and later , one between East Lexington cnd 4rlinp.ton Ttelghts . r'onsiderin f' the opportunities for future development of homes, the °resent Peirce ' s Bridme Station and the Fast Lexington Station will take care of these -future developments -uch better tran consolidated station. The aolition of grade crossings as c_fectir_n• railc.a� stations . TT-is is one of the main rensons 'or A scientific study. I the railroad is to be 1 oc ered throurrhou+ any con- �luc;l<'.oie U1�Ud.11(.d , b fit.,( 1Ulab b.IUula !ie lucCteu 1 1-C,al rezere.lee to the new 7-de . This iq a n-rti c'ilarly vital point :.n connection with rho centre e+ration . 'Te t_o not, a1- event 7-noc ihet1'er the road v7ill be lowered or r'lised. The Town should avoid the sit- uation developed in some cit- es \'_fere rail way gtrti or � p located in S hole in the ground and the tr< f"fic facilities are 11 far above it . The Board considered the cuestion of the extension of Locust Avenue and its accei)tance by the -own. It considered ;articular]," t.r_e o. ncti.on of Locust A\ enue an0 el.len Road as irid out by the Town Enp,ineer and voted to recorlrlenc the extension o ' Locust Avenue as laid out by 'Le7mTrn Engineer, and to recom- ?F 2. mend the accentanre o Locust tven•ze to '`.he point ‘There the present grade ends . The 3oard considered the question of' 1ayins water mains in anacceDted streets mnd 141th the t nder- stndina that the qater Board is collecting evidence as to the methods in other towns, the matter was lent in Abeyance :'or `'inure consideration. "2 . H.`.I.R''ST'0T Secretary. TrT- Th -DT 17T- _ . I , , , - , Lexington 21anning Board. March 25, 1923 . 111 Where were present Messrs . ureeley ,, '. adsworth, _ilton and Hartman, with Town engineer Duffey in conference . she board considered the question of the :last I,exington flats and its general feeling was that thra3 lines of action were worthy of consideration. 1 . To take the flats - but anis cannot at the moment be definitely decided upon be- cause of Arlington's contract with an outside concern. 2. To take a certain portion of the land around the flats for a marginal park and boulevard. 3 . To take the land of the suburban Land Co . for park purposes for the com- bined objective of developing the town park system and of protecting the town from a development which will ultimate- ly be far more expensive than the taking for park purposes . After further consideration it was Voted: _o recommend the takint of the entire holdings of the Juburban Lana Co . ana at least X63 feet around Lhe flats to Maple street for a marginal park and boulevard. Voted: That the board recommend the development of no additional street entering the Common from Belfry Hill and that if it is found necessary for the development of the land in the vicinity of Belfry fill to develop a new outlet, tne board recommends that it follow an extension of 2orest street essentially as laid out in tne plan of oauury , 10/4. Votea; o recommend that Highland .avenue be extended to 'addle :itreet at a point near its junction 7oa.d and that the tory.► build the street and assess the cost on the abutting properties . 410 Minutes of Planning Board i Meetings of June 3 and 10, 1920 . 110 On June 3 the planning b oar a, the o oari of curved, the town counsel and the town engineer, met in joint meeting wi.th similar of-ricers of the town o-P Arti.nRton to discuss the question of their mutual interests in the Lexington Great Meadow. The objects to be attained, the mutual in- terests of the towns in the attainment of these objects, the legal and other principles underlying the present situ- ation, were discussed at length and the joint body request- ed the planning boards representing the two towns, to- gether with the town counsels , to prepare a tentative plan of the proposed takings and a base for an agreement which would accomplish the purposes in mind. At the meeting June 10 the planning boards and the town counsel from the two towns met and considered the plan itaand base of agreement as apart of this record. At the close A. of the meeting the Arlington Board agreed to give the matter attention as a board amend to consider it with the Arlington authorities which hav ancted in the matter and report back to the Lexington Planning Board. 411 The need for prompt action was mutually recognized, mutual interest of the two towns was re-affirmed, and it was agreed that action should be taken as promptly as conditions would permit . TENTATIIYE AGREEMENTS USED AS A BASE 2Oit DISCUSSION AT ?H JOINT MEETING OF THE ARLINGTON AND LEXINGTON PLATING BOARDS ON JUNE 10, 1920, RE. LlaINGTON "GREAT AT MEADOW". s The Town of Lexington Agrees 1 . That it will proceed to make a taking for park purposes of the land now belonging to the auburban Land Co ., so-called, and of the land constituting the "Great :ieadow" and will go to the Legislature and endeavor to obtain whatever legislation is necessary for this taking. Such taking of the land of the "Great Leadow", however, is to be made subject to the existing easement of the Town of Arlington to use such land as part of a water system or water storage basin, and subject also to the rights un- der an existing lease given by the Town of ,irlington for the re- moval of peat therefrom, but the area to which this water basin privilege shall attach shall be that area shown on plan made for the Lexington Planning Board as "the water basin", and the bal- ance of Arlington's land shown on said plan shall be released from the easement in order that Lexington may lay out at an ap- propriate time a boulevard around the basin. 2 . That upon such taking being consumated and at the termi- nation of the lease (or its abandonment) of the premises above referred to, Lexington shall take charge of the water basin, 411 so-called, of the "GreatIeadow" and as the agent of the Town of Arlington cause the same to beflooded and kept flooded for the purpose of securing to the Town of ,;rlington the same flow of 2 . water for its reservoir and the same rights to such water that they would have if the Meadow were to be flooded by Arlington. 11/ leo guarantee, however, to be given by the z'own of Lexington as to the quality or quantity of water to oe i;uus aelivered. 3. That no taxes shall be levied by the Town of Lexington a .ins+ the 'Poen of .Ar1 irpton on the "(`=rent ':'[ea.tow" rrorerty and no charge made against Arlington for custodianship after Lexington shall have become custodian thereof, as above provid- ed. 4. In the event of Arlington deseir*ing a larger storage capacity in the water basin Lexington agrees to make reasonable excavation, all expense to be paid by Arlington. The Town of Arlington Agrees 1. That it will consent to Lexin;ton making the taking for park purposes of all the land included in the "Great Meadow" subject to its flowage easement for water purposes, such ease- ment, however, to be considered only as attaching to the actual water basin shown on plan made for the Lexington Planning Hoard and not to the surroundingbasin, the title of which is to vest in Lexington absolutely for park purposes and of constructing a boulevard around the basin at an appropriate time. • 2. That it will assist in every appropriate way to obtain the legislation to accomplish this end and that it will confirm by deed the title of Lexington under its taking of the land which Arlington owns in fee in the "Great iieadow" subject to 3. water rights and subject to the lease, as aforesaid, to the land in the water basin. • 3. That upon the taking being completed and Lexington acquir- ing title as aforesaid and upon the expiration of the present lease of the premises, it will consider and appoint Lexington • as the sole and perpetual custodian of the water basin subject to the agreement of the Town of Lexington, however, that it will cause the same to be perpetually flooded so that the Town of Arlington may have the benefit of a water reserve without, how- ever, Lexington mating any guarantee as to the quality and quantity of water so to be delivered. 4. xhat the Town of Arlington will make no claim against Lexington for land or other damages under the taking by the Town of Lexington, as aforesaid, in any manner whatever . adPPLE>E lARY QUESTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED 1 . The exact boundary of the water basin and area. It was considered that this would be probably necessary as a basis of the agreement between the two towns . 2. The question of the repairian rights involved in the matter . 0 PLANNING BOARD MEETING December 10,1920. Messrs. Greeley, Tilton and Wadsworth present. Communication read from Mr. Fred Emery asking if any plan had been devised relative to the bridge development and road building now going on near Vialtham Street . Mr . `Pilton reported that a plan had been made and was in Mr. Luffy's hands and that he had so notified Mr. Emery. The Board at this time adjourned to attend a meeting of the Selectmen relative to the layout of the streets on plan of the "Home Guardian Company" land. The Planning Board recommended at this hearing that the streets on this plan be brought to grade before being approved. The Chairman reported that the Boston & Maine authorities had stated that they would rebuild the Lexington Station and plan on spending about c13,000 thereon. PLANNING BOARD REPORT FOR 1920 During the year 1920 the Board has been occupied with numerous questions, including the following: 1. Repair of station, future disposition of railroad lands, safeguarding entrance from is:erriam Street, etc . The Board, acting with the Selectmen, has succeeded in getting the President of the railroad to order the repair of the present station, with the addition of important features . Estimates are under way. A plan contemplating the abolition of the lerriam Street grade crossing has been outlined. 2. Land developments. The Board co-operated with the Board of ,Jurvey in conferences with the Town of Arlington to settle the future use of the Great Meadows, and later on con- ferred with the Town Engineer and the State Department of High- ways. The resulting plan was partially carried out by a vote of the town taking for park purposes certain lands bordering the Great :endow. In North Lexington developments, two in number, have been visited with the Town Engineer . In the case of the "Lex- ington Park" land, the Selectmen of Bedford were called in con- ference . Your Planning Board assisted in the preparation of a elan, which is now under discussion. The Kendall Farm Development is at this writing await- ing the result of public hearings . A plan has been prepared by the Town Engineer, including all the surrounding territory bounded by Bedford, North Hancock, and Burlington Streets . The Planning Board has advised in favor of the local control of as much of the undeveloped areas as is possible . In all cases of land development by outside parties who are not interested in the town, the Board of Survey Act gives the Town power, under penalty of witholding public service (water, sewerage , street maintenance , etc . ) from such land, to approve or disapprove layouts submitted by the owners. The town has insisted that such layouts shall show proposed streets ( 1) conforming to the natural topography, so as to give easy grades, proper drainage , etc . , and (2) at such distances apart as to allow proper depths for house lots for the type of resident likely to buy in the locality under consideration. 3. The Board has taken up the question of a legislative act to require the Land Court to obtain the approval by local boards of survey or planning boards of land sub-divisions, be- fore such sub-division shall be recorded by the said. court. -2- While the Board can continue to be of use in connection with details of administration and. current problems , its true function is in the field of the general future development of the community. Respectfully submitted, Tzf'M. ROGER GREELEY, Chairman EDWARD T . HAR TMA N, CHRISTOPHER S. RYAN, FRED S. PIPER, J. ODIN TILTON, HENRY L. WAD SWOR T H. 1921 PLANNING BOARD J. Odin Tilton Christopher S. Ryan William R. Greeley Henry L. Wadsworth William H. Ballard Frederic R. Galloupe PLANNING BOARD MEETING January 14, 1921 ,Messrs . Greeley and '"iadsworth present . At this meeting it was stated that the matter of specify- ing a plan for future road construction in Lexington would be taken up. fir. Blodgett , the former chairman of the 1''inance Committee , appeared before the Board and stated as his idea that the Planning Board should take an active part in seeing that definite plans for road construction be carried out from year to year and that this Board urge each year the necessity of a definite appropriation being made for specified road work instead of allowing the appropriation to be made generally. After report from the Town Engineer as to the road mileage in the town and the number of miles of each kind of construction, and the further discussion of the general subject of road building, the meeting adjourned. DEFINITIONS FOR STREET NAMES ALLEY. A narrow service street . Any short street thirty feet or less in width. AVENUE Originally meant access to a house or building. private drive- way. More recently applied to a broad public street . BOULEVARD . A broad avenue decoratively laid out, especially with park space in the center. CIRCLE. Circular junction of highways or circular endof a single highway. COURT. Rectangular pocket off a highway. CRESCENT. Sime-circular pocket or short street . EMBANKMENT. A built up bank or terrace on the edge of a body of water. ESPLANADE. A flat wide area - any clear level space especially for public walks or drives . LANE Narrow open byway or passageway of any length. MALL %fide level shaded walk. PARK Applied to public reservations only but not to highways . PATH A public foot-way. PLACE Similar to "Court" . bray also be applied to junction of a number of highways. QUADRANGLE An open square surrounded by buildings . ROAD A highway connecting one settlement , neighborhood, village , town or municipality with another, generally bearing the name of the locality. Highway from place to place . ROW A short street or passage . SQUARE Rectangular junction of highways. STREET Originally a paved way. A highway forty feet wide or more which is or has been part of a subdivision of land for building pur- poses . A main highway of a settled portion of a town or city may be so named . A highway in a settled place . TERRACE A court or short street occupying with its adjacent lots a small plateau. TURNPIKE Originally turnstiel or turnpike , that is a toll road, a road connecting distant points and passing through several communities . ?"WALK Similar to "Path" . wAY A highway less than forty feet wide and not exceeding one-quarter mile in length. See "Lane ." . ;s?IND:- A narrow lane . MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD March 24) 1921. Present: Messrs, Greeley, Galloupe and Wadsworth. Mr. Galloupe had not been sworn in so it was decided to take no final votes and not to organize for the year. VOTED: To have a monthly meeting first Thursday of each month. The question of establishing a set-back for Waltham St. , was discussed, but no action was taken. The Somes system of assessment was discussed and suggestion made that such a plan sould be worked out to secure equalization in Lexington. It was agreed that a definite plan sould be worked up by this board and suggestions given the assessors. Suggested that the planning board should study the question of whether land on Waltham Street should not be bought be prepare for further school house development. ADJOURNED _L PLANNING BOARD April 7, 1921. The board had a joint meeting with the spectial town eemmis.e4m1,042 on roads and the Board of Selectmen. Present: Messrs. Greeley, Gallcupe, and Wadsworth of the planning Board Subject under discussion Construction of town ways. Joseph A. Thomeselloo road contractor, was present and .-t lny=5.� for this construction work. ADJOURNED T MhETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD . gay 1, 1021. Vere present Messrs. Greeley, Ballard and 1;adsworth. duly Mr. Ballard had beenAsworn as a member cf the board by the Town Clerk. Vowed: That our chairman, hr. Greeley, be instructed to interview the Town Engineer and with him sucg'est a plan for established building lines on Bedford, 'ialtham and MuzseTT Streets and to -resort the plan and any suggestions at the next meeting. of the Board. Voted: That Mr. Ballard be instructed to interview Er. Foster Sherburne and find out fror him if possible-, when the plan on the Lexington Station can be carried forwarded. Voted: That Ten Dollars be donated to the Massachusetts Federation of Planning Boards and that the board notify the Town Treasurer of this vote. Meeting adjourned. MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD June 2, 1921. Were present Messrs Greeley, Ballard and Wadsworth. The chairman who had consulted with the Town Engineer submitted for the consideration of the Board a plan for establishing building lines on Bedford St. , Waltham St. , Muzzey St. , Mass. Ave. , and Woburn St. The Board VOTED to recommend to the Selectmen the adoption of the plan as outlined and authorized the chairman to commu-icate his plan to the Board of Selectmen and to file a copy of the latter with the clerk to be made a part of the minutes of this meeting. The matter of the town securing sites for school houses in outlying districts while there is an opportunity of purchasing such sites at a low figure was taken up and discussed. Upon suggestion by Mr. Ballard it was voted to authorize the chairman to communicate with the school committee for the purpose of considering with them, the future school needs of the town. It was VOTED to direct the Town Treasurer to pay from the appropriation of the Planning Board the sum of #50.00 to the firm of Kilham & Hopkins for work done in drafting plans for the remodelling of the B & M Station. The chairman submitted for the consideration of the meeting a list of definitions fordifferent types of town ways and suggested that in naming streets it would secure more uniformity if these uniform definitions could be employed. it was VOTED to authorize the Secretary to send a copy of these definitions to the Board of Selectmen with the suggestion that the Planning Board favors the use of such list in the naming of future town streets. A copy of the list of definitions is attached to the records of this meeting. MEETING ADJOURNED MEETING OF PLANNING BOARD - NOVEL ER 9 , 1921 There were present Messrs . Ballard , Greeley and Wadsworth. • The matter of the repair of the railroad station was dis- cussed , also the matter of the possible sale by the railroad of the land in front of the station on Eassachusetts Avenue . All the members of the Board expressed the opinion that this plot ought to be protected in behalf of the best interests of the town. The Chairman appointed Er . Ballard to act with the representative of the Selectmen to see Mr. Eustis of the Rail- road and call to his attention the vote of the town on March 17 , 1919 ! copy of which is hereto appended ,\ that the town would accept a deed to the lot under the conditions specified in the vote , and also to call to his attention that other citizens in the town were willing to buy other railroad land which the Road was seeking to dispose of at a price which would cover the cost of reconstructing the station . Replying to the letter from the Selectmen calling attention • to the petition of Mr . Ferguson for permission to extend Forest Street to Massachusetts Avenue across land at present owned by the Hancock Congregational Church, the Planning Board unanimously passed the following vote which was duly presented to the meeting: VOTED: That the Planning Board do not approve of the plan to extend Forest Street to Massachusetts Avenue across land of the Hancock Congregational Church. Bat in connection with said vote , it was the sen .e of the members present that the matter of extending Forest street should be given further consideration and a further recommendation made at a later date . The Chairman reported that the agreement which had been drawn up by which the abutters on ilassachusetts Avenue from Iu"uzzey to Cedar Street agreed to have a twenty foot set-back against their respective properti es was being circulated but that he personally had not time to attend to the matter and that consequently the matter was not carried forward as rapidly as it might . The opinion was expressed by the members of the board that in creating the set-backs on the different streets that the consent of all the owners should be obtained if possible end thus save the town the expense which would be incurred if building lines were established by law. � a Q • METING OF PLANNING BOARD - DECEIMER 29 , 1921 otelp. There were present Messrs . Greeley, Tilton and V;adsworth. Reported by Dr . Tilton that the Planning Board teerk up the matter of the proper administration of the Town Triangle about which there has been considerable discussion. No action was taken on the chatter since it was felt that this matter might work itself out if a new form of government were accepted by the citizens . The Chairman reported that he thought we had done as well as could be expected in getting the Boston & Maine Railroad Station repaired in view of the fact that the railroad has little money to spend and that the Railroad have contracted to spend X8000 or 49000 in the work. He further reported that the Boston & LaineRailroad have planned to sell land in front of the station on Massachusetts Avenue and he had received information from the Selectmen that the Railroad owned the plot absolutely and could sell it if they wished . It was suggested by the Board that the Secretary look into the matter of ownership of the plot and see if any conditions were in the deeds by which the Road originally acquired title . It was suggested by the Secretary that inasmuch as the €rade crossing proposition had to be worked out before the station proposition could be finally settled that perhaps it was just as well at this tine that no large amount of money were put into a new station. The Chairman spoke of the recommendation of the State Forestry Department with reference to the re-forestation of town lands and suggested that this was a matter that the Board might consider . The Chairman also reported that signatures were being obtained by J . S . Hill and himself to the agreement being circulated of the owners of property on Massachusetts Avenue with reference to the twenty-foot set-back. He said this was really an administrative job and the Board ought not be called on to do it . It was VOTED that this Board recommend that the Selectmen proceed to work out /*Astation near the common. It was the sense of the meeting that the annual report of the Planning Board should incorporate the plan of the Board for the development of Massachusetts Avenue below the common showing the limit for business purposes on the Avenue and suggestions as to town hall location. 0 PLANNING BOARD REPORT FOR 1921 The Board has pursued three main lines of study this year. (1)TOWN CENTRE. One of the most important considerations connected with Town Planning in Lexington at the present moment is to develop and maintain in the centre of our village a proper and worthy setting for the Common. The Common is a priceless possession held in trust for the whole nation as the birthplace of American Liberty . The citizens owning property bordering on the Common have one and all voluntarily placed upon their properties re- strictions that will for 100 years preserve the present character of the immediate surroundings . The next step, that of maintaining the approaches to the Common,must be made by the Town as a whole . The Common is annually visited by countless thousands. The avenues leading to it are none too wide . It is possible to preserve not only the present legal width, but also the present width between buildings , by establishing building lines , as provided in Chapter 82, Section 37 of the General Laws, and as recommended later in this report. The main approach to the Common is Massachusetts Avenue where it passes through the centre of the village . Several elements enter into the working out of a suitable civic centre and approachto the Common at this point . The Board has worked out a plan, under which the commer- cial development on the avenue will extend through the present business district northward as far as Muzzey Street and the Railroad Fark. Beyond Muzzey Street we hope that any future buildings will be set back according to the policy outlined below under Building Lines . If as part of this scheme , the Town decides to place its new Town Hall on property between the Avenue and Raymond Street, from Euzey Street to the Library lot , it would definitely estab- lish this locality as the civic centre of the Town, with Town hall, Public Library, Common, Buckman Tavern, Fire Engine House and ailroad Station in one continuous group. In this case , the wooden store building on the opposite side of biassachusetts Avenue should not, when it is destroyed, be replaced by another similar structure , but the land so released should be developed in connection with the Railroad Park and the Buckman Tavern property, to afford a worth approach to the Common. In this event, Muzzey Street should be widened and extended across the Park land to Waltham Street at the foot of _Loring Hill. This would form a more direct and convenient as well as much more attractive approach to the Town from the west . By providing for set-backs on I+ uzzey Street, a broad avenue can be secured for the future , giving adequate approach to the centre from the west . This avenue would join Massachusetts Avenue opposite the Railroad Park, and along the line of the possible future site of the Town Hall or other public building. -2- The Railroad Station and Park, therefore , occupy a very important position on the right of the avenue, approaching the Common. The repair of the Station and the preservation of the Park are matters that have constantly engaged the attention of the Board. When the station was damaged by fire , a new station was contemplated, and plans were presented by the Board. Opposition developed from an unexpectedsource and prevented the acceptance of these plans . After prolonged effort and repeated conferences, the Board worked out a scheme for restoring and adding to the present station, which met with general favor, and is now being carried into execution by the architect of the Railroad. The Board is unable , at this time, to report finally con- cerning the Railroad's policy in regard to the disposition of the Railroad Park on Wassachusetts Avenue . (2) BUILDING LIMES The Board has recommended to the Selectmen the establish- ment of building lines on all the main thoroughfares. Anyone familiar with the street system knows how narrow are certain portions of Waltham Street, Vloburn Street, Bedford Street and Massachusetts Avenue . The Town is not in a position financially to widen these streets, but it can provide for future widening without present expenses by establishing set-backs, or building lines . these lines should be fixed with the consent and co-operation of the abutters whom they benefit . If an abutter on one of these streets owns a house which sets back 50 feet from the street, it is to his advantage to accept a rule that will prevent his neighbor from building closer to the street line than himself. If another abutter has a house within 10 feet of the street, the 20 ft . set-back does not harm him in that it does not affect existing buildings, and it benefits him as it limits his neighbor from building up to the line . Convinced of the advantage of such lines, your Board on June wrote the Selectmen asking them to take the matter up with the Town. We believe that no other single item of Town Planning is more important than the above , and that it should be put through promptly. (3) PLAYGROUNDS AND SCHOOLHOUSE SITES The third item in our program has been the consideration of future playground and schoolhouse sites. Our schoolhouses are all on or near the main street of the Town. They are all crowded . A large number of pupils are transported from distant parts of the Town to attend these schools . In the near future they must be enlarged or new ones provided , or both. We believe that where an isolated district of the Town has so many children that it becomes a matter of great expense and an inconvenience to transport them to a schoolhouse near the centre of the Town, there is every reason to consider a -3- local grade school building. Transportation cost would be saved. Local needs could be met more perfectly. .j'he cost of the site would be incomparably less, than even a cramped piece of ground in the centre of the Town. ':kith the latter point especially in mind, we have visited sites in one of the largest districts, have taken members of the School Committee to these sites, and now respectfully report that land for a building with ample playgrounds can today be obtained at a low acreage cost, but that soon such land will be encumbered with buildings and will then cost the Town many thousands of dollars per acre . No schoolhouse would be built upon such land at once but we believe the need of suitable play space for baseball, etc . in the various outlying districts is alone of enough consequence to make immediate action by the Town advisable . We believe that the people of these districts have a right to the benefits above proposed and we hope that the Town as a whole will adopt such a policy without further delay. The Board was instrumental, earlier in the year, in pro- moting the scientific study of the Good Road Movement , and was represented on the Committee that planned the road-work last spring. tit the suggestion of the Field and Garden Club, the Plann- ing Board took up the question of the need for a Convenience Station in the center of the Town and has submitted to the Park Board a plan and recommendation for such a station in the neighbor- hood of the Common. The need of this feature has been emphasized again and again, and would seem to require no further debate . The Park Board has welcomed the cooperation of the Planning Board, and should be supported in this enterprise by the citizens . In regard to the land developments, the Board has kept in constant touch with the Massachusetts Federation of Planning Boards and the State authorities, and finds no adequate means of control of such development, except through purchase of the land by citizens who will develop it properly. This has been done successfully in Belmont, Norwood, and other communities, and the Board has cooperated with efforts to do the same thing in Lexington during the past year. The Board has been represented on the Committee for a revised form of Town Government, part of whose recommendations has been accepted by the Town. Law enforcement in Lexington has at times been very low. The Building Laws are now being enforced in an able manner, with the exception of that portion relating to billboards . A law is of little value unless backed up by puclic opinion. Public opinion throughout the State is running high against billboards . If the law that we already have is not good, we should revise it. Unenforced law is destructive of government . -3- The comprehensive survey of the Town is progressing, under the charge of the Town Engineer. Very little progress can be made by the Engineer in his own work, however, so long as he is called upon to perform manifold outside duties for other depart- ments . vghen it is finished, the Planning L)oardts most important work will be a general study of development, based on this survey. Iieanwhile , the Board looks for intelligent support of its recommendations , as outlined in this report . Respectfully submitted, 1922 PLANNING BOARD J. Odin Tilton Henry L. Wadsworth William H. Ballard Frederic R. Galloupe Leroy S. Brown Willard S. Brown At a meeting of the Planning Board held April , 1922 all the members were present except Mr. Galloup. Mr. Willard Brown and Mr. Leroy sat with the Board for the first time. The Board proceeded to organize and Mr. William {. Ballard was elected chairman of the Board for the year. Mr. Henry L- Wadsworth was elected secretary and while he objected to serving he agreed to act until a successor was chosen. The activities of the Board for the previous year were discussed and in particular the matter of the Railroad Park and a possible saving of it for the town was discussed , but no formal action was taken on any of these matters . PLANNING BO AFD MEETING May 26, 1922 A meeting of the Planning Board was held I. ay 26, 1922. The following members were present: - Messrs . Ballard, W. Brown, Leroy Brown and H. L. Wadsworth. Consideration was given to a plan showing street layout of land of the Lexinr-rton Building Trust andthe sentiment of the meeting was as expressed in letter below. H. L. Wadsworth ( Signed) Secretary May 26, 1922 Board of Selectmen Lexington, Mass . Gentlemen:- At entlemen:- At the last meeting of the Planning Board held May 19, 1921, a plan was submitted to our Boardfor consideration, showing a projected laying out of a street on land of Lexing- ton Building Trust, North Lexington paralleling Bedford Street . After considering the said lay out it was the opinion of the members of the Planning Board that while a street thus parallel- ing Bedford Street would be desirable substantially as indicated on the plan, that the matter of its termination, approaches and out-lets could not be well determined without full data regard- ing the contemplated future street lay out on the tract being before the Board. lours very truly, HLW/M At a meeting of the Planning Board held June 29 , 1922 except all the members of the Board were present Messrs . Galloup and Tilton. Mr. Cerussi appeared before the Board in regard to a 11, lay-out of streetson his development near Vine Brook off Massachusetts Avenue. 1'o formal action was taken. The Lexington Building Trust presented a plan of street lay-out to the Board showing the streets at present contemplated and which they desire to have approved. After much discussion it was VOTED that the Board recom- mend the approval by the Selectmen of the street lay-out on land of the Lexington Building Trust in :.dorth Lexington as set forth on a plan thereof, dated March 1922, subject however to such modifications of the curves shown at street intersections as maybe worked out and approved by Mr. Duffy, the Town Engineer, and Mr. Kelloway, the engineer for the Trust; that a plan show- ing such modifications be submitted to this Board at a later date. At a meeting of the Planning Board held October 2, 1922 the following members were present : William A. Ballard, Willard D. Brown, Henry L. Wadsworth, and Dr. Tilton. Mr . Harrison, the Superintendant of Public Works and Hallie C. Blake, representing the Park Department were present as guests. A discussion was had of the future development of the undeveloped area near the Centre of the town. Mr. Blake explained his idea of a memorial arch at the Parker Street Playground. A plan of Mr. Duffy, the Town Engineer , of a possible further extention of Forest Street to Massachusetts Avenue was studied by the Board. It was expressed as the sense of the meeting that a more detailed plan' be made of the pro- posed lay-out of .L1orest btreet extention, showing possible house lots , etc . The Board decided that Mr . Nolan, of Cambridge sho4ld be invited to address it and that the Selectmen be invited to hear him. It was left with the chairman and Selectmen to select a date. The question of a Zoning plan for Lexington was taken up and the sentiment seemed to be general that something should be done at once to formulate a plan. 4ir A December 1, 1922 bar. Henry L. Wadsworth 16 Hayes Avenue Lexington, lass . , Dear Sir: Mr . Foster, a Landscape Architect , will be present at the Town Hall on December 8th, 1922 at 8 o 'clock P . M. to present his views upon town planning for Lexington be- fore the Board of Selectmen and the Planning Board. This arrangement has been made in accordance with the understand- ing I have with Mr. William H. Ballard that you should be notified when it is convenient for Mr. Foster to be here, and I trust that I have selected a night when every member can be present . Respectfully submitted, Christopher Harrison(Signed) CH/G SUPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS. Meeting held on above date at which all members of the planning Board were present except Mr. Galloupe . The Board of Selectmen were also present . After Mr. Foster ' s address the matter of having his firm make a survey of the town was discussed but no definite action taken. H. L. Wadsworth (Signed) Secretary Jar' ids 1#r'.3.• 'p y�r'A tl 'at:; a fr Y n 1 :4"+t $t r`��{R �ih •.J:�' 11 i FA'W � 1 :<, i.�Rl. :��-/Ei�S..y�.a tR'` 1��:> �lr �k �.A{: ��-f�s�•o..Ja3 �A..Si FW.J Jr�-6"d:• 19=.. Xaa the towns and cities the °looted ole are) of noceesitara of wile . iva altiont all or their tine to the cxroe'a:> wade el, their corrarlity. The `lir : fleard serves the elected offieove end the citizens of* the torn °Fal f in an revisory ortopo.eity. twiny airaaje in nind the ibuture tame La well as the present neeeesiti nu. • `:' !o procedure up to the wetter& tb* hem been t o ooeoidor various unrelated' pt'obl ~:n. : thee/ have arisen and boon presented entt s to the lloard • , s citizen or eons rrenb fl of the I3cord. are all froiliar with sihat has trdten place in rs- rs,t 1 :s Cy) so.ealled Depot h t.rk; title e o Which has now peened to the :tual o ".rx.esk7tc ns 7410 '.',"C al appropriated sppre: '_adwoi ono-liar of tho caret o 11 j"."'; t t, EitBa . o bc.i'•noe contriluted individual effluence, lr: eon-lection with the .7arehatte or thie Ay it ss rmed to be the unanirtous a`,3: ice Viet provision o old ho r arse so that = ci o zu ettn =kvenuo Gould be widen el tatb eet farteou root. Fz:o noltt star; will be to ;Arovi e for the possi bl Wider :aast balance or rfi(t ohusette :arae am:rmdnatel.y rtete.nfoot I three& the centre or tbs to arrent.edca eenrere oo in I)oect„.:Taer boween the .'I`cot z-,,; , thez t lw lb Irx.e.rd 411.11.1) ` . Poster. nesoeinte or Jeer% ,:elen- of Cambridge, P.Za.ss., a specialist, Planning. in Tovrn.n Rs €a moult this; confiert*tCc 'Y. ?Wen hue aa' to t .lata to the se see "..t I !„or furnie.incxt prelinlmry service wt .ck'.` t1 11 he see '°z" Xal ior the Town to !Iwo in order t rt all or the eltisens CE1i1 a azaderst'.aa►1 t ha • Mid manner in etioh vie nen, en a "cries pion to rite na Z:r�e z i z•r l;lf`00,t1 4 von mar to your, in Wallow uc .ere intorantocl firot in the onsets end ilttioz or tho • eonoern and not In tho posebilition a the enoon, mod* an '':ouns to htivo aOcospioto cu to of outr aneeto and liabillt14.)a. and our future 7:)ooalb5,11- ties for 04atnaloo.,in order thet we man, as Individual eitireno of tho Vona a rt* opinion and take dofinite steps tooard aceavint; tihat WU . be best for us nil, .hope that the Seleetnen 411 make a dofinito reoomondation to you for the appropriation of a: atefloioni„ anonnt, of !Kalov In laa41 oo that toy can employ tho norricoo of a otrtx)tont 70r-an Ilrinnor to eorvilo a crarvqz or tho r,,tran & Loxington* ibepootfulty euirlitteda. H. LSi:147), Clifdrrzxn ;114-4-1Y L. uloa 1). z;:,Etoi: K. FaIan J. (;)Ti FRED GALLOUPE 193 PLANNING BOARD William H. Ballard Henry L. Wadsworth Frederic R. Galloupe Leroy S. Brown Willard D. Brown Frederick L. Emery 4 At a meeting of the Planning Board held ?March 5, 1923 in Carey Hall, the following members were present ; .:'illiam A. -) Ballard, Willard D. Brown, and Henry L. Wadsworth. Mr. Neil Mackintosh and his Engineer, Mr . Gannett appeared before the Board and requested its approval of a street lay-out shown on a plan of Mr. Gannett' s of a develop- ment to be had on the land on the Waltham Road beyond the State Road on the right . Mr . Duffy, our Engineer , was present and showed the Board the lay-out which he had made and both plans were dis- cussed at length. No official action was taken by the Planning Board but it was VOTED: To instruct the Chairman of the Board, Mr. Ballard to meet with the Selectmen in regard to the lay-out and explain that the Planning Board is willing to approve of the -lan showing the two main thoroughfares indicated on Gannett' s plan but object to the projecting of a street up the steep grade to the small rec- tangular piece of land shorn on the plan, and that the Board also feels that a modification in the lay-out of the cross street near ar'altham Street on the further end of the lay-out should be changed to extend over in the direction of and as near as possi- . ble to the drainage area in that section. It vas the unaminous opinion of the Board that Spring Street should be widened as a part of the development shown on this plan but no definate action was taken on this phase of the matter. chi-e.�- JOINT 14I:I• IJ G OF PLANNING BOARD A1 ) 3FLYGTI i I . s }ept. 7, 1923 A joint meeting of the Planning Board and Selectmen was held in the office of the selectmen on Friday evening, ,eptember 7th at 8 o'clock. There were present Hr. Black, lir. Moulton, Supt. Harrison, !1r. Emery, Dr. Tilton, Mr. Y.D.Brown, together with Hr. Hartman and tr. Greeley whose advice had been sought in connection with the subject of zoning. In the absence of Hr. Ballard Mr. Emery consented to serve as chairman and called on Mr. Hartman, first stating that some of the Board felt that no steps should be taken in connection with zoning without the employment of expert advice: whereas others believed, inasmuch as no appropriation for this purpose was likely to be made by the Town, that with the assistance of Mr. Hartman, Yr. Greeley and others as well as with help from the State House, the Planning Board itself could devise and put through the nec- essary measures. All were agreed that the immediate need for zoning regulations was imperative. Hr. Hartman in reply stated that any partial system of zoning would be ill advised, as in instances cuoted such regula- tions had not been. upheld by the courts. Yell considered and carefully studied measures for an entire community had been upheld, however, throughout the country. To devise such measures without proper expert assistance he considered "extremely hazardous", and assistance of this sort was much cheaper than subsequent litigation. The cost of such help was negligible -.a few hundred dollars-- Zoning men rather than Town Planners would be the best to call upon, among whom he mentioned John Fox who has done excellent work in ',',inchester and other places, Hr. Conray of Cambridge, and others. The steps to be taken would be as follows: 1. A carefully prepared map of the town showing the location of building plants, factories, service stations, stores, residences and the like; a map, in short, showing graphically the uses to which the various sections of the town were being put. -1- 2. `sem map prepared, the zoning nen employed would visit all sections of the town and talk over with the citizens the needs of the various neighborhoods, thus getting a thorough and intimate knowledge of the entire town. 3. 1th thin knowledge at hand and with the needs of the town as a whole in mind, he would then make a tentative man of the town showing his ideas of the necessary advisable re- s tris tions. 4. Heetings would then be held in the various sections, the plan showed, explained, di mussed and changes and revisions made so that a cot, unity feeling is built up that is strongly behind the proposed scheme. 6. nith the plan and the accompanying regulations annroved by the various districts, a final map is prepared and the eonini system thus worked up is presented at `,'own ;leeting for final a cccpta xce. To prepare a plan without the above cooperation on the part of all and attoript to put it through would be fatal. neither would it be necessary at this time to allot commer- cial zones for all time: conditions change and the regulations may be amended or added to at any time by tate same steps taken in connection *°re th their original adoption. It :could be wise, however, to get started on this work im- mediately. Every day's delay spells possible difficulties. The town iu changing rapidly, and if we are to preserve it as a high class residential locality, we should at once take the neces- eery steps to bring this about. In reference to the cost of skilled services, :fir. Greeley stated that the `.Gown of -.skefield not long since called for pro- posals from a number of zoning experts and the highest price quoted, although ca3 efield covers a larger territory and presents more difficult conditions, was 050.00. The zoning system adopted, Mr. Hartman went on to say, the next immoeiate step should be the establishment of building lines throughout the town and he told how with the cooperation of the citizens, very urge areas had been acquired in this connec- tion in Yinchester and Brookline and with practically no cost to the torn. 44bThe entire movement too be a success must be a comm nit * affair. In Mr. Greeley, whom {:'r. 14nery stated had agreed to cooper- ate with the Planning Board in every possible way, Mr. Hartman declared Lexington possessed a zoning expert of the very highest grade. Mr. Greeley remarked if he was to do anything in this con- -2- neotlon it must be with duo consideration to the future growth of the town that no short eiehted policies rainht bo adopters. No help of any kind,, it transpired, could be obtained from the «tate louse cr from the Attorney noral'e office. However, -".r. to rtman thought the following plan entirely feasible x 1. For the 2awn Engineer to spare a plan of the e"tires town shoe.Ing its nsca at the present tire, with au ee tions as to its 'uture development. 2. For the Plaening Board in cooperation with the oelectmen and with the assistance of 4r. Greeley as well as Supt. Harrison, Yr. Duffy and others interested, to work out a simple system of zoning which at the present time in Lexe ington ought not to prove a difficult matter. 3. ?or the ..aeloc Tien to arrange for and hold hearings in the various sections of the town. 4. To obtain all nooessary legal advice in the preparation of byeiaws at a slight expense. Suint. Harrison stated that Duffy Mould be at liberty to engage on this cork early in October and was confident in two weeks time that the preliminary map and information could be pre- pared. �# an initial step towards the inauguration of a toning system in Lexington, the heloct m n were asked to authorize 'ere Luffy to presecute this work as early as :Supt. .: +trrison oan spare her: for this purpose. In connection with the voluntary agreements for the estabr. lisl*snt of building lines twenty feet back from both sides of Massachusetts Avenue from the Oonmon to Hastings Park, Mr. Greeley stated that all but three signatures lad been obtained and urged that these be obtained at once that the proper sanction of the tows may be teecurod i cwetie tel t'. it was agreed that the reit meeting of the Hoard should be held on 'riday evening, September 14th at 7:ZM o'clock. Meets adjourned. 410 Report prepared at the request of br. emery by illard. D. Brown. es* PLANNING BOARD MEETING. Sept. 14, 1923. A meeting of the Planning Board was held in the Selectmen's Room on September 14th at 8 o'clock, there being present Mr. Ballard, Dr. Tilton, Mr. Emery and Mr. VI.D.B. Brown. C HA IRPrA N Mr. Ballard insisting that it would be impossible for him to act as Chairman longer, his resignation is reluctantly ac- cepted and Mr. :finery is elected in his place, the latter accept- ing the position only with the understanding that he may have the active cooperation of the other members . SECRETARY Mr. W.D.B1 tas elected Secretary. MASS. AVENUE SET BACK That the remaining signatures may be obtained to the vol- untapy agreement for a 20 foot set-back or building line on either side of Massachusetts Avenue between Clarke Street and Cedar Street, it is agreed that: Dr. Tilton will see Mrs . Litchfield who now has one of the papers; Mrs . Stratton; and Mr. H. L. Wellington. Thr. Emery will see Mr. E. D. Lane and Mrs . Crosby. Mr. Ballard will see the new owner of the MacDonald property and St. Bridget's Church authorities. Mr. Brown will see Mr. Lyon Carter and Mr. Seaver. It will be their endeavor to obtain these signatures before the next meeting. WEEKLY MEETINGS It is agreed that until further change the Planning Board shall hold weekly meetings on Friday evening of each week at 400 7:45 o'clock. FOREST STREET EXTENSION Mr. Ballard reads a letter from Mr. scammon notifying the Planning Board of a hearing to be held on the proposed extension of Forest Street on Monday evening, September 17th at 8 P.M. On motion of Mr. Ballard it is moved and so voted that: • The Planning Board recommend that Forest Street be extended at its present width to Mass . Avenue and that Jackson Court be • extended at its present width to Forest Street; both extensions substantially as shown on blue print of Plan of Proposed Exten- sion of Forest Street to Massachusetts Avenue, Compiled from Sur- vey and Office Plans, December 1921, J. Henry Duffy, Town Engineer. • It is understood that the above vote carries with it no approval of the loop indicated on the above plan. VINE BROOK DEVELOPMENT The next matter to be considered is the layout of streets in connection with the Cerussi Development, so called. Mr. Blake of the Board of Selectmen gives the history of the takings already made and states the matter is now being considered by the Land Court. Mr. Charles Ryder explains he has no immediate interest in the matter, and that for theinewly acquired property adjoining he has made no plans for development, his idea being that should he sell it would be for large estates . As to area included in proposed boulevard connecting with Winthrop Road, he agrees that no building shall be here erected without due notification to the Board of his intention so to do. that:After careful consideration of the situation the Board rotes The Planning Board recommends to the Board of Survey that they proceed to acquire for the Town for Street purposes, either by taking or agreement, a strip of land from Massachusetts Avenue to Vine Brook Road, sixty (60) feet in width from the westerly boundary of the taking by the Board of Survey under date of Nov- ember 6, 1918, with proper curves at the approaches. ALSO: That said taking be continued across Vine Brook Road to its junction with proposed boulevard as laid out by the Board of Survey under date of January 28, 1916. It is further voted that action by the Planning Board con- cerning the taking for said proposed boulevard according to lay- 400 out approved by the Board of Survey, January 28, 1916 be deferred until further data be furnished as to proposed extension of same to and through the Park Property of the Town; which data the Selectmen are requested to furnish the Planning Board as promptly as possible. Meeting adjourned at 11 o'clock. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Sept. 21, 1921. A meeting of the Planning Board was held in the Selectmen's Room on September 21st at 7:45 o'clock, there being present 40 Messrs . Every, Tilton, L.S. Brown and W.D.Brown. The Secretary's report of the previous meeting was approved and accepted.. MASS. AVENUE SET-BACKS As to the remaining signatures to be obtained in connection with the set-backs on Mass. Avenue it appeared that with the ex- ception of those of the new owner of the MacDonald property and the Catholic Church authorities, on which a report from Mr. Ballard was awaited, and of Mrs . Litchfield who had declined to sign, all had been obtained. Mr. Leroy Brown volunteered to make a further endeavor to secure the latter signature and it is hoped that all may be obtained before the next meeting. BUILDING LINES ELSEWHERE It appeared to the Board that no more valuable line of endeavor in the safeguarding of the proper development of the town could be undertaken than the securing of similar volun- tary agreements to that now almost effected. along Mass . Avenue from the Common to Cedar Street. In conformity to the views of the Planning Board of 1921 in a letter to the Selectmen dated June 15th, it was agreed to make a beginning of this undertaking along the following streets: 1. Bedford Street from Mass . Ave. to the Bedford Town Line. 2. Hancock Street, from the Common to its junction with Bed- ford Street in North Lexington. 3. Meriam Street its entire length. 4. Clarke Street its entire length. 5. Muzzey Street its entire length. 10 6. Waltham Street from Mass . Ave. to the Waltham. City Line, 7. Lincoln Street from Iass . Ave. to the Lincoln Town Line. 8. Woburn Street from Mass . Ave. to the Woburn City Line. -1. 9. Mass. Avenue from Woburn Street to Arlington Town Line. 10. The State Road from Mass . Ave. to the Lincoln Town. IL* . Maple Street its entire length. 111 10 Rather than indefinitely prolong the accomplishment of this work by attempting without outside help to cover the ter- ritory outlined above one street eet at a time, the Board were agreed that by enlisting the aid and cooperation of citizens living on these streets, the whole matter might be successfully put through without undue delay and without an excessive amount of work on the part of its members . It was agreed, therefore, to invite to the next meeting the following gentlemen to whom the above plan should be ex- plained, the great and immediate necessity of its being under- taken explained, and the enlistment of their services secured. Representing Bedford Street: Mr. T. A. Custance Mr. Wm. C. Stickel Mr. T. H. O'Connor Hancock Street: Dr. Howard T. Crawford Mr. G. L. Gilmore Mr. S. L. Barbour if Meriam Street Mr. Hallie C. Blake Mr. Robert P. Clapp Clarke Street Dr. Fred S. Piper Muzzey Street r`r. 'sward H. Mara Mr. Byron Earle " Waltham Street Mr. John L.A. Mulliken Mr. Neil Macintosh Mr. Geo. H. Gibson " Lincoln Street Mr. James Crone ..2.. Representing bile S Mr. Robert L. Ryder n i 'P Massachusetts Avenue. and Woburn_Streets • A group of owners to be made up by the Chairman. It was further agreed that Mr. L. S. Brown should have oversight of the work on Bedford and Clarke Streets : Dr. Tilton on Muzzey Street, Waltham St. and Lincoln St. ; Mr. W. D. Brown on Hancock and Meriam Streets ; and Mr. Emery on Massachusetts Avenue and Woburn Streets. That there may be no ambiguity or error in connection with the forms to be used, the Chairman agreed to collaborate with the Town Counsel in drawing same up and to have them in readiness for the next meeting. FOREST STREET EXTENSION Mr. Blake of the Selectmen appeared and stated to the Board that at the hearing on Monday night the recommendations of the Planning Board in connection with the Extension of Forest Street and Jackson Court a.ad met with a favorable response . Meeting adjourned at 9:20 o'clock. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. Representing State Road Mr. Neil McIntosh, Jr. Mr. .R. J. Fawcett Mass . Avenue Mr. James J. Walsh I Mr. Alfred Pierce Mr. Frank D. Peirce 4 Mr. Charles R. Joy Mr. Anselm C . Muller Mr. Charles J. Dailey PLANNING BOARD MEETING. Sept. 28, 1923. i A meeting of the Planning Board was held in Cary Hall on Sept. 28th at 7:45 o'clock, there being present Messrs . Emery, L. 3. Brown and D. Brown, together with the follow- ing citizens who had responded to the Secretary's invitation: Mr. R. P. Clapp Mr. Hallie C. Blake Mr. Cornelius O'Leary Mr. Neil McIntosh Jr. Nr. Alfred Pierce Er. J. Henry Duffy Mr. T. H. O'Connor Er. F. H. Moulton Mr. G. H. Gibson The reading of the Minutes of the last meeting being dis- pensed with, Mr. Emery explained what our neighboring towns have been doing in the way of establishing building lines through the cooperation of abutters ; the initial attempt at this sort of thing in our own town'so nearly an accomplished fact as to demonstrate its possibility; he great and imperative need of endeavoring to safeguard at once, not a single street at a time, but a large number of streets ; as well as reading a tentative draft of a proposed form to which the abutters should subscribe. Expressions of opinion were then asked for . Mr. O'Connor approved the scheme but thought while it would be very easy to obtain signatures from individuals, say in his own neighborhood, it would be difficult in the case of farmers . He was willing to canvas his street. Yr. O'Leary after further explanation on the part of the Chairman expressed his willingness both to sign such a proposed paper himself and to obtain the signatures of his neighbors. Mr. Pierce thought it a most excellent idea— the sooner we get at it the better— felt he could obtain all the signatures along Mass . Ave . to Bryant's Corner without any difficulty. Later raised the question if the proposed set-backs might not work a hardship by preventing a man's selling his land for the erection of a store on the street line. 40 Mr. Neil Macintosh while he considered the proposal an ex- cellent one and expressed 'Lis willingness to sign any such papers, thought they should include some regulations as to venders' s Lands . He also felt that the owner of a corner lot would suffer a material hardship , a 20 ft. set- back on two sides, and if some easement were not given him on the side street that he would not be inclined to sign. The Secretary read some notes of a conversation Ath Mr. Hartman wherein the statement was made that land set off as sug- gested becomes available for street widening purposes at any time without expense to the town. Mr. Clapp stated that either Mr. Gartman was misunderstood or was in error, as by voluntary signing the proposed. restrictions 10 the owner merely agreed not to build in advance of a certain line and he in no wise surrendered any rights that might be his in case it was later desiredto widen the street and the land was wantedby the town for this purpose. Neither could he agree with Mr. Macintosh's contention as to the desirability of reducing set-backs oncorner lots . Mr. Duffy explained the operation of the building line movement in Winchester as told him by Mr. Hinds, Town Engineer. As to the number of signatures obtained before bringing the matter to the town, while no definite percentage was set forth, it was usually felt that at least 805 should be secured. An interesting experience was toldof a main street on which some years ago 700 of the owners signed up for a building line . This not having been deemed sufficient, the matter was dropped. Now a new owner is planning the erection of a block on the street line. It will cost the town a large sum to prevent it. This owner is said to have remarked that he is next going to try this scheme in Lexington. Further discussion followed and it being clearly evident that all present were in sympathy with the inauguration of the movement, they were told that as soon as the necessary details could be more thoroughly workedout they a.2d others would be asked to serve as a volunteer force to assist the members of the Planning Board in securing signatures . Mr. Duffy agreed to have studies made of the proper set- backs on the streets already suggested, particularly Bedford, Hancock and Clarke Streets, before the next meeting of the Board on IT,riday, October 5th, until which time the meeting was adjourned . Willard D. Brown, Secretary. Planning Board Meeting. PLANNING BOARD .`.IEETIIJU Oct. •5, 1923, A meeting of the Planning Board was held in the eelectmen's room on Friday evening, October 5th at 7:45 otclock. Those attend- ing were Messrs. Emery, Ballard, L.S . and UP. Brown, together with Lir. Duffy, Town Engineer, and 4r. Greeley who was present for a short time. MASS. AVENUE BLDG. LITE_ It was y,Qted to recomend to the selectmen and Board of Survey that they proceed promptly in accordance with the law, to establish building lines on Massachusetts Avenue from Clarke Street to Cedar Street: said building &ines to be twenty-feet (201 ) back from ex- terior lines of highway. Also to transmit to said Board the re- leases obtained by the Planning Board fror all property owners on both sides of the street covering such building lines. BEDFORD :?reLEE y1 It was voted that the Planning board obtain signatures for re- leases for building lines to be established on both sides of Bedford Street from assacbusetts Avenue to the Bedford Town line ; said building lines to be twenty feet (201 ) back from the exterior lines of the street. After amendments had been made to the original draft, it was vet tO adopt the following form of release. '''To the Selectmen and Board of Survey, Lexington, u.lassachusetts. Subject to the conditions named below, the undersigned, owners of property bordering on Street, respectfully petition your honorable board to establish, as provided by law, a building line twenty feet from the exterior line of, each side of 11, said street; and we hereby mutually agree and covenant with each other and with the town represented by you, to execute any agreements, conveyances or releases necessary to establish the said building line as appurtenant to our respective premises:, it being understood, however, that said agreement and covenant are made upon and subject to the following conditions : (1) Said. agreement and covenant shall not apply to existing buildings or structures but only to new structures, and to additions to or extensions of existing structures. (2) Said agreement shall not be binding upon the undersigned unless and until at lease 750 of all owners of property abutting on said street shall have signed like agreements . 't 4 It was then voted that the Planning :3oard obtain signatures for releases for building lines to be established on the following streets ; said building lines to be back from exterior lines of these streets as below set forth. FIAVCOCK .S'ar ' a Beginning at the southerly end of Hancock Street and extending to Hayes Avenue and including same :-. Vesterly Side Easterly Side Twenty (20) feet back Twenty-five (25) feet back /TS r Fran Hayes Avenue to Adams Street easterly Side Easterly tcrly Side Fifteen (15) feet back Thirty (30) feet back i' }.rom Adams Street to Bedford Street Twenty-five (25) feet back on each side. CLel ., STET.-"' Avenuen S* : T from Mass. to _ ores �� gree t. esterly Side Easterly Side On corner lot owned by Miss Harrington ten (10) Twenty-five (25) feet back. feet back. On the remaining land owned by the Town twenty-five (25) feet back. From Forest Street to Parker street Twenty--five (25) feet back oneach side . LITTZ Z Y S 12hEE T Since elzley Street from "lass . Avenue to Forest street varies IP from 46 feet. to 40 feet in width, it was voted to obtain signatures for building lines to be established on each side varying from a distance of twenty (20) feet back from the street line at l+lass. Avenue and increasing gradually to approximately twenty-three (23) feet back et Forest Street; and from Forest Street to Vine Brook (20) feet back on each side of the street, PARKER STREET Twenty (20) feet back on each side and for its entire length. 4111 Time was lacking for more than a summary the ``' �; preliminary of conditions on Meriam Street and the centre portion of Mass. Avenue and the meeting adjourned at 10:55, subject to the call of the Chairman. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. lb PLANNING BOARD MEETING Oct. 26, 1323. A meeting of. the Planning Board .was held at the Town Hall • on Friday evening, October 26th at. 7:45 o'clock. Those in attendance were Messrs. Emery, Tilton, W.D.Brown, and Mr. Duffy, Town Engineer. MASS. A7ENUE FROM MERIAM STREET TO ARLINGTON LINE The meeting was mainly devoted to the consideration of building lines on lower Massachusetts Avenue and it was voted MERICaM TO WOBURN STREETS 1. To establish a building line on the northerly side of Mass. Avenue from Meriam Street to Woburn Street, to give a maximum width in the clear of 100 feet. 2. To recommend the laying out of a 40 ft. service street from Woburn Street to point Approximately opposite Waltham Street, there to turn at right angles and enter Mass. Avenue; this service street to be substantially. 100 feet from said building line for its entire length. WOBURN STREET TO OAK STREET To establish a building line on Mass. Avenue between Woburn and Oak Streets twenty (20 ft) feet back from both street lines, making a maximum width in the clear of 100 feet. OAK STREET TO ARLINGTON LINE As the establishment of a building line and possible future widening of this portion of the Avenue involved difficulties in connection with the private burrying ground Mr. Duffy was asked to submit to the next meeting a drawing showing a possible future relocation of the street. ZONING Some time was spent in the discussion of the Zoning situa- tion and the following tentative suggestions in connection with the establishment of business zones were made for future con- sideration. MASS. AVENUE (CENTRE) No Business above Muzzey Street. Business zone from Muzzey Street to Woburn Street and Winthrop Road, both sides. WOBURN STREET Business zone from Mass. Avenue to Manley Court, both sides . 40 MASS. AVENUE (East Village) 1. From Maple Street and including garage above Follen Church. 20 Between Sylviz and Bow Streets,. 3. At entrance to East Lexington R. R. Station on easterly side, 200 ft. in each direction. 11 1, Nov. 16, 1923. MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD 411 The regular meeting of the Planning Board was held at the Town Hall on Friday evening, Nov. 16th at 7:45 o'clock, there being present Messrs. Emery, L. S. and W. D. Broom, Dr. Tilton, Mr. Duffy, Town Engineer, together with Mr. E. S. Hartman and Mr. Greeley. A letter was read from Mr. Stone, Town Counsel, to the effect that the Town had never accepted either Chapter 82, Section 37 of the General Laws or its corresponding preceeding law under which the building lines on Massachusetts Avenge may be established. The Secretary was instructed to call Mr. Stone's attention to the List of General Legislative Acts accepted by the Town since 1856 in the Report of the Committee on Town By-Laws wherein it is stated that Rev. Laws, Chapter 18, Section 103 relative to the establishment of a building line was accepted by the Town on December 1, 1902. Mr. Every then reviews the tentative system of commercial zones adopted by the Board at its last meeting. In reply to questions Mr. Hartman advises that a certain number of district hearings will be necessary to settle local problems; but that there will be no need of a general public hearing as the Town Meeting is an equivalent to same. He advises no mention be made of Concord Hill Store or the Brick Block in East Lexington, these to come under the heading of non• conforming buildings. No nonconforming building destroyed by fire up to 60% of its value (50% would be better in Lexington) should be allowed to be replaced. All zoning regulations must be drafted with deliberation, due thought and chance of expression. The By-Laws should state first the general purposes sought, followed by definitions, the body of the textiand lastly, the enforcement conditions. In Chicago, dwellings other than for ene family are classed • as Apartments. If Lexington is contemplating restrictions relative to two family houses, now is the time to do so. To zone now for business only and later to seek regulations for two family or other classes of buildings would mean an amendment to the original act, requiring a 2/3 instead of a majority vote. Where private restrictions .are already established, these remain in force if more stringent than called for under the zoning ordinance. It was then moved and unanimously voted that the services of Mr. Hartman be retained to advise with the Board and to prepare zoning plans and regulations. For Mr. Hartman's guidance in the work consideration was given the different classes of zones to be established. Heavy Manufacturing Not to be permitted. Light Manufacturing These might be restricted to goods manufactured and sold over the counter; it was the sense of the Board that a certain amount of approved character might be admitted. Mercantile Buildings While the liklihood of wholesale bus- iness being established in Lexington seems remote, yet at present there is the Lumber Company plant, Merriam's factory, the Jefferson Union plant, Breck-Robinson Nursery. Subject left for future consideration. Residences (a) Single Families (b) Semi•Detatched (c) Double Houses. Apartments Not permitted. The possibility of saving to the Town a considerable portion of Tophet Swamp by acquiring Tax titles was spoken of. Mr. Emery reported writing the Board of Survey of the change in the character of development now being carried on by the Lex- ington Building Trust and of the lack of any jurisdiction on the part of the Planning Board: this resulted in a meeting of the Board of Survey with Messrs . Burgess, Richards, Kellaway, Wether- bee and Mr. Duffy. Amended plans are promised at once. Meeting adjourned for two weeks, at which time Mr. Hartman hopes to have plans prepareT or the consideration of the Board. Respectfully submitted, IP PLAN'dING BOARD MEETING November 22, 1923. A meeting of the Planning Board was held in the Town Hall on Saturday evening, November 10th, at 7:45. Those in attendance were Messrs. L. S. Brown, F. L. Emery, W. H. Ballard, and Mr. Duffy of the Engineering Department. W. H. Ballard was appointed temporary Secretary. Mr. Leroy Brown moved that we approve a ten foct building line on both sides of Waltham Street from Massachusetts Avenue to Vine Brook, and for the remainder of Waltham Street to the Waltham line, a building line fifty feet from the centre of the street. Business Zones A tentative discussion followed as to the portions of the Town which should be unrestricted for use for business purposes, the remainder of the town to be restricted against use for business purposes. • Lexington Centre - Massachusetts Avenue from Carey Library and Buckman _ o V. .. Tavern to Winthrop Road and Woburn Street. Waltham Street, both sides from Massachusetts .venue to Vine Broom Road. 0- ' Woburn Street from Massachusetts Ave. to Cottage S+reet easterly entrance • x and Manley Ct.. Query as to Woburn Street frontage of the Russell House. Lowell and Woburn Streets- 200 feet from their intersection. Bedford Street from garage andpoint opposite, to northerly boundary of Custance property and Meadow Land adjoining the Railroad and Lumber Co. property. Bedford Street at North Lexington, easterly side commencing with property of the Street Railway Co. and northerly to point where Street Railway right-of way returns to Bedford Street. Easterly sidg, from B. Ea M. R. R. north,,,including property of the Lexington Coal.Co. �"' "VN"VN-Ark' . .e Bedford Street at North Hancock Street, r- 250- feet from�intersection of streets. �, ( ,,t..,e+'� y,...,,, fi ��� $:,,�_ :�.�= { - = • Lincoln Street and. State Road, - 300 feet from intersection of same. Massachusetts Ave. north side from Cedar Street, west to Lake Street. --c•", Waltham Street at State Road, southerly from State Road on both sides- of Waltham Street for 250 feet. Waltham Street, junction of Concord Avenue, ,?...5fr feet from the intersection. --Mass. Ave. and Maple Street, property occupied by the Gas Station and , easterly side of Mass. Ave. f o: urveiStreet to the Pollen Church. Mass. Ave. at East Lexington Station,,property occupied by garage. Mass.-Ave. from Bow Street southerly, both sides to the Arlington Line. c w Special exemption for Merriam and other factories. 40 Meeting adjourned at 11 P. M. (?-L'.t,,.._ ,:,W. H. Ballard — W �` Secretary pro tem. Nov. 29, 1923. PLANNING BOARD MEETING - 40 A meeting of the Planning Board was held at the Town Hail on Friday evening, Nov. 29th at 8 o'clock, there being present Messrs. Emery, L. S. &_ W. D. Brown, together with Mr. Duffy of the Engineering Department and Mr. Hartman. The latter two gentlemen having prepared a map showing the various uses to which property has been put and the distribution of same throughout the town, the attention of the meeting was given to a reconsideration of the zones tentatively agreed upon at the meeting of November 10th. With the following exceptions they seemed logical and wise: a. "Lowell and Woburn Streets, 200 ft. from their intersection." b. "Lincoln Street and State Road, 300 feet from the intersection of same." c. "Waltham Street at State Road, southerly from State Road on both sides of Waltham Street for 250 f t. d. "Waltham Street, junction of Concord Avenue, 250 feet from intersection." To avoid congestion of through traffic at these points when business buildings should later be erected, it was agreed that some system of set-backs should be arranged for. Owing to the con- ditions it was found impossible to devise a formula applicable to all, and it was decided to have prepared for the next meeting plans showing the proper treatment of each of the above intersections; these plans when adopted to form part of the zoning regulations. It was further decided to reduce from 250 to 200 the allotted zone under Item c. e. "Bedford Street at North Lexington, easterly side commencing with property of the Street Railway Company and northerly to point where Railway Rightoaf•Way returns to Bedford Street. Easterly side from B. & M. R. R. north, including property of the Lex- ington Coal Company." 411 Last sentence of above changed to read:- Easterly side, from Sunny Knoll Street north in- eluding property of the Lexington Coal Company. -1m f. "Bedford Street at North Hancock, 250 ft. from intersection of streets." IIAmended to include only the present development along Bedford St. and to extend only to proposed street. g. "Mass. Avenue from Maple Street, property occupied by the Gas Station and Easterly side of Mass . Avenue from Curve Street to Follen Church." 40 To read - from northerly end of Curve Street to Follen Church. h. "Mass. Avenue at East Lexington Station, property oc- cupied by garage." Amended to extend from Cemetery to and including Garage and back to R. R. Station on both sides. It was felt that four classes of zones only need be provided for. 1. Single Family Dwellings 2. Semirdetaehed Dwellings 3. Double Houses 4. Business. 1. In a general way this to follow the present development- of the various areas which would embrace the Follen Road and Highland Avenue districts from Pleasant Street to Winthrop Road; the land sur- rounding to Common and Massachusetts Avenue from the Cary Memorial Library on. The Robinson Hill district. The Granny Hill district including Meriam,, Oakland,Streets, Somerset and Berwick Roads to and including Adams Street. Hancock Street. The property of the Lexington Out-Doors Club, etc., etc. 2. This zone to be worked out by Mr. Hartman for consideration by the Board with suggestions that the property along the B. & M. R. R. tracks between Meriam and Hancock Streets and that in the neighborhood of Forest Street might be devoted to such use. 3. This zone to follow the present development along lower Massachusetts Avenue and also on minor thoroughfares. r 4. As noted hereinbefore, apartments to be allowed in this territory. IIIConsideration was given the problem of overcoming the piggery nuisance and Mr. Hartman agreed to have information bearing on this point available in the near future. He also agreed, with Mr. Duffy's assistance to endeavor to prepare tentative zoning plan on the lines indicated above' for consideration at the next meet. Dec.7th. ..a_ II Meeting adjourned at 11:15 o'clock. Willard D. Brown, 'N Secretary. MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD Dec. 7, 1923. A meeting of the Planning Board was held at the Town Hall on A Friday evening, December 7th at 7:45 o'clock, there being present Messrs . Emery, L. S. & W. D. Brown, Dr. Tilton, as well as Mr. Hart- man and Mr. Duffy. The matter of set-backs in connection with the property onnthe corner of Mass . Avenue and Muzzey Street was discussed with Messrs. Clapp & Pierce to whom it was made clear that that the only set-back asked for in this connection was that of 20 feet on Muzzey Street. Reports were received in connection with the building line petitions that with two exceptions the signatures of every property owner had been obtained along Mass. Avenue from Nunn's Corner to Woburn Street and 75% of those from Bow Street up; and that prac- tically 75% of such signatures had been obtained along Bedford Street. In regard to Hancock Street it seemed apparent that some modi- fication should be made in the building line as originally laid down for the westerly side, and it was decided to hold up the obtaining of signatures along this street until the matter could be given further consideration. Attention was then given the zoning map prepared by Mr. Hartman and Mr. Duffy. Owing to the physical character of the properties it had seemed wise to them to amend the lines of two of the business zones decided upon at the last meeting by limiting the extent of the zone at the beginning of Mass. Avenue from the Town Line to one lot above Sylvia Street and by omitting the property at North Lexington A.ying between Sunny Knoll Street and the R.R. Station. It appeared that only one percent of the dwellings in the town consisted of superimposed double houses and that of a large number of extensive land owners none were in favor of allowing this class of buildings on their properties. The result of the engineer's studies of set-backs at intersecting thoroughfares were examined and discussed and it was felt these should be given further careful study. With the exception of these intersections the plan as a whole met wth the approval of the Board, and it was decided to call a hearing next Friday evening, December 14th for consideration by the property owners therein of that portion of the town 'lying to the north of Adams and Hancocks Streets; Elm Avenue and that portion of Mass. Avenue from Elm Avenue to the Concord line. A rough draft of the proposed notice to be sent by mail was read and approved. Meeting adjourned at 10:15 o'clock. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. FIRST PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO ZONING. Dec. 14, 1923. The first of the sectional hearings relative to zoning that portion of the town north of Adams and Hancock Streets, Elm and Massachusetts Avenues, was held at Cary Hall at 8 o'clock on December 14th with Messrs. Emery, L. S. and W.D. Brown, Mr. Hartman and Yr. Duffy in attendance. 400 notices had been mailed to property owners in this section. Including four members of the Board of Selectmen and Town Manager Harrison, there were 31 persons present, 6 of whom were women. Mr. Emery opened the meeting by telling what the Planning Board was doing in respect to the establishment of building lines, and what it hoped to accomplish in the way of establishing building zones, covering the whole matter in a very clear and comprehensive manner. Mr. Hartman then explained in detail the tentative zones sug- gested in that part of the town under consideration and as indicated on the prepared map and asked for opinions, suggestions and crit- icisms on the part of those present, that the final map to be presented to the town as a whole may express the feelings of all as to the direction and character of the town's development. In response the following citizens spoke: Dr. H. L. Crawford: Inquires as to manufacturing plants; also seeks more light in regard to matter of building line restrictions. Glad the former are to be excluded and records himself as in favor of the latter. Mr. Bashian: Questions harmonious appearance Jr streets if stretches en- tirely devoted to business are allowed at intervals. Will this not also tend to raise values in these districts and work a hardship on those who might obtain a less expensive location elsewhere: 14 t i' expresses himself vehemently at 10 the idea of making it impossible for the poor Armenian, Greek and Jew to live here . Already,because of the restrictions of the Selectmen and Board of Health, it is impossible to earn ones living by keeping pigs. After Mr. Emery's clear exposi pion of the real aims of the Planning Board' , he gives half hearted assent to willingness to cooperate. Mr. C . S. Ryan: Heartily in favor of zoning plans as a whole . Takes ex- ception, however, to wisdom .or necessity for extending business zone on Bedford Street from property of Custance and Lumber Company to Colonial Garage. Considerable sums have already been spent to keep business from this area. Land if properly drained well adapted for dwellings. Garage not necessarily is permanent fixture . Mr. Swan: Agrees entirely with Mr. Ryan. And as holder of more or less property in this locality, would be very sorry to see , it set aside for business. Mr. Hartman points out that with the drift of business al- ready towards this locality, if the land were restricted to res- idences an appeal to the Courts might not only admit business but might imperil the zoning scheme as a whole. Mr. Emery suggests that if the Owners of this property desire to exclude business, this result can perhaps better be attained by voluntary restrictions on their part. Mr. Scammon shows how the zoning ordinances may be upheld by the Courts and tells of a case that arose in Newton. Mr. George W. Reed inquires of the character of the development suggested for Reed Street. Is pleased that single residences only are to be permitted as rumors of double houses had reached his ears. Inquires also as to the extent of the proposed business area in North Lexington. Mr. Lidberg expresses his hearty approval of the zoning scheme. Mr. Dodge would prefer a single residence restriction on low land near B. & M. R. R. tracks in North Lexington rather than a business zone. Mr. Seaver declaims against superimposed dwellings and would prohibit all such save possibly in centre of town. Mr. Every points out the possible hardship this might entail on the owner of a narrow lot and asks for an expression of opinion from those present on the desirability of acting on Mr. Seaver's 9,uggestion. The vote is overwhelmingly in favor of such a course only one person appearing to oppose same. Mr. Bidwell e; presses approval of the zoning plan. Messrs. Hunt and W. L. Smith have no remarks to offer. Mrs. Peckham speaks enthusiastically- of the beauty of the town and its layout and affirms her view has been supported by numerous architects. No other expressions of opinion being forthcoming, the hearing is declared closed. PLANNING BOARD MEETING I/ Immediately following the zoning hearing a meeting of the Planning Board was held. CLARKE STREET Owing to the general reluctance of owners along Clarke Street to agree to a twenty-five foot set-back, it was moved and voted that 20 feet be substituted for 25 feet wherever the latter now appears in the petition for establishment of a build- ing line along this street. A tentative arrangement was made to personally inspect the properties along the westerly side of Hancock Street on Sunday afternoon with the view of arriving at some more equable arrange- ment as regards set-backs. The possibilities of obtaining names of property owners from Board of Assessors was canvassed. fleeting adjourned at 11:15. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. SECOND PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO ZONING. Dec. 21, 1923. 01) The second of the sectional hearings relative to zoning that portion of the town lying south of Adams and Hancock Streets, Elm and Massachusetts Avenues, and extending to the division line between Precincts 1 and 2, was held at Cary Hall at 8 o'clock on December 21st with Messrs . Emery, L.S. and W.D. Brown, Mr. Hartman and Mr. Duffy in attendance. Over 700 notices had been mailed to property owners in this section. Including Messrs. Scammon, Burnham and Blake of the Board of Selectmen who came in towards the close, there were 42 persons present. As at the previous hearing Mr. Emery and Mr. Hartman re- viewed at length the activities of the Board relative to both building lines and zoning; told what it was hoped to accomplish, explained the map, and asked for criticisms and suggestions that the Planning Board might learn the desires of the citizens . In response the following persons spoke: Mr. Woods :— Thinks business sections too widely scattered through the town. He would eliminate all small outlying business centres. Mr. Wadman: Differs entirely with Mr. Woods . Feels strongly that if stores and shops are confined to the centre it will be a hardship on all those living at a distance. Mr. Wr i gh t i n g t o n:.,.. Inquires as to character of zone at Five Forks. Mr. Hollis Webster: Asks what is the fundamental reason for the •b jection to stores in outlying areas. Has often in other towns seen buildings devoted to such. uses that were distinctly more attractive than those of the community they served. Mr. Wood:-- Askel to answer this question but is unable do so. 10 Mri Has always been strongly in favor of zoning. Wishes to make clear, however, that though strictly residential districts are mapped out, it does not mean that they of necessity remain so for all time, it beingpossible to reg-zone such areas later by a 2vote of the town. Mr. James S. Smith:— Is in favor of the zoning idea. Raises question as to the possibility of erecting hotel in any but a business zone. Under what classification would the Lexington Cut- e doors Club come?- a strictly business proposition. Are the business areas contemplated adequate for future growth of the town' Is satisfied at Mr. Hartman's assurance that they are twice the size of Arlington at the present time and 6 times as great as at present; the figures as prepared by the Town Engineer being Lexington, present business 3870 ft. bus, zones contemplated 21,850 ft. Arlington, present business . . . .9,240 ft. Mr. Clapp:— While in favor of excluding further manufacturing from the Town ques tions who cher it can be done legally. Mr. Wilson:-- Reserves any remarks until hearing in Precinct 1. Mr. 'Wadman: Inquires why Pleasant Street is restricted from business and not intersections as at Five Fork.;. Asks what are the objections to two family super- imposed houses. Points out their superiority to the semi-detatched type. Claims if they are not erected owners cannot afford to erect any but the cheapest form of single house, the Town not only losing thereby much in the way of taxes, but the attractiveness of its future growth being greatly lessened. Mr. Neil McIntosh: Replies to Mr. Wadman by stating that of 700 acres developed by him around Boston less than 10% of the buyers desired two-family houses . Out of the 40 houses already built in his Lex- ington development, but two are two-family houses . • The objections to this class of house seem to be : 1. the looks 2. they don' t seem to have the same privacy. In other words, they are not so "homey". Mr. Woods:- Inquires if the Board has taken into account the problem of new stxeets or boulevards, especially as a factor in a fine development of our surrounding hills. Mr. Hamlin:-- Wants to know if there are any restrictions at present in force preventing a building trust or an individual from cutting up a development Into small lots. Mr. Ferguson:— Thinks the town should be restricted as to cost of residences. Mr. Hartman:— Mr. Hartman makes clear that this cannot be done by any zoning regulations. The only persons who can dictate as to the cost of any building to be erected is the person selling the property. Mr. Cuter:-- Inquires as to private stands erected by farmers and must they be in the business zones? Tem- porary stands can, of course, be erected anywhero on the farmers ' land. Mr. Webster:— Inquires as to permits as for selling farm produce. Understands that many such stands are 2-tin by outsiders who bring in their goods from Boston. Mr. Scammon:- States that permits are required for Sunday selling but not for .leek days. Mr. Spaulding:— Is surprised that it is proposedto prohibit any manufacturing business from coming to the town. It seems to him that this should be encouraged. Fears the effect of too drastic regulations. Hearing adjourned at 10:10. 10 PLANNING BOARD MEETING Dec. 24, 1923. 40 Immediately following the hearing the Board discussed with interested citizens the problem of Post Office accommo- dations, it appearing that the present quarters being out- grown, the authorities have been searching for new locations and have under consideration such inaccessible sites as the Quinn property on Grant Street and the North Lexington car barns . A telegram in regard to same was drafted by the Chairman to be sent Representative Dallinger. It was moved and voted that the set-backs of 20 feet and 15 feet respectively adopted for the westerly side of Hancock Street between Mass. Ave. and Adams Street be redueed to 15 feet and 10 feet. It was decided to hold the hearing relative to the zoning of Precinct 1 on Thursday, December 28th in 2merson Hall; but it afterwards transpired that other events occurring on this evening made it unwise and the date was advanced to Friday, January 4th at 8 o'clock. Willard D. Brown, Secretary 40 1924 PLANNING BOARD Leroy S. Brown Willard D. Brown Frederick L. Emery J. Henry Duffy Edwin B. Worthen J. Odin Tilton 'a'HZII) PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO ZONING. Jan. 4, 1924. The 1i Lrd of the sectional hearings relative to zoning that portion of the town included in Precinct 1 was held at Emerson Hall, East Lexington, Friday evening, January 4th at 8 o'clock, with nessrs. x raery, D. Brown, Hartman and Duffy in attendance. 425 notLces had been mailed to property owners in this section the previous >:saturday: 60 persons were present at the hearing. Er. i: ery in opening the meeting outlined the work the Planning Board was attempting and spoke of the urgency of action on the part of the town in respect to the establishment of both building lines and zoned areas. The statute under which the 3oard's initiative was authorized was read and made clear, the tentative zoning map explained, and criticisms and suggestions asked for. Mr, Hartman spoke briefly of the history of the zoning move- and its rapid spread throughout the country, and discussed some points not covered by Hr. eery. The meeting was then thrown open for discussion, the following persons speaking:- r. 'ac Isaac: (68 Charles Street) :-. Thinks an owner should be privileged to erect a single dwelling alongside a two-family house: is pleased to learn that a tingle house may be erected any- where. Nr. Vonber :-- Inquires as to type of houses contemplated for Liberty Hill. Approves of this area being restricted to single family houses. Lir. !-xacIsaac:-- The whole proposition too important to be acted on hastily: a small map should be mailed each voter that he may have time to consider it carefully. r. Balogh:-- Inquires as to type of houses contemplated for Butler Avenue. .Approves this area being restricted to single family j, houses. On being questioned states this to be the feeling of the entire neighborhood. Mr. Alex. ‘Alson:-- Thinks above expression of opinion of no value whatever. Denies Yr. Balogh's competency to speak for his neighbors in this matter. Mr. Connor:— Believes in the zoning plan and the restrictions as a whole, but thinks it unfair in some respects. Heartily ap- proves two-family houses where they are properly restricted. In .)omerville they have been allowed to be built too close to each other; in East Arlington where they are from 20 to 25 feet apart be considers their appearance "very pretty". wets forth their super- iority to single family houses in that they bring in more revenue to the owner and their valuation is higher, which means added revenue to the town. States that banks will lend money on two-family houses where they will not on single dwellings. Mir. Holt (corner Mass. Ave. and ?:saple street) :-► states that he moved from Arlington to Lexington for the ©xpres€; purpose of getting away from the two-family house district. Thinks that area from curve ,.,treet to Maple Street should be limited to single family houses. pile there are a number of two-family houses in this stretch at present, Sleeve they are all single dwellings which have been changed over. No new two flatters have been erected. Is positive the majority of the people in this section are in favor of single family houses. (No others present, though asked to express an opinion, either confirm or deny this. Pyr. dolt declines to give names of any present living in this section. ) 11r. Chamberlain:-• Is positive that the two-family house cannot be taxed auffieiently to meet the added expense to the town, which 11 must in consequence be met by the owners of single family houses. Mr. Frank Pierce:,-... Agrees with Mr. Jolt in that the section between Curve and %aple treets should be restricted to single family houses. Beautiful building land on both sides of the street. Mr. Gibson:-- Inquires if it is planned to restrict business in East Lexington to one side of Mass. icvenue. Thinks it should be permitted on both sides, even if for shorter distance: much less damage to children. ".r. :iarshall:.. Asks relative cost of educating two-family house children as compared with coot of maintaining highways for one family house automobiles. The wealth of any town is in its children. Me would not object to having two-family houses built next his own single house. Approves, of business zone restrictions including filling stations, but would not differentiate as to kinds of dwellings. Yr. Patrick Flynn:— Deplores houses built out here in the country with no land about same. If the zoning system does nothing more for Lexington than to save it from the experiences of zaomcrvi.11e 41 and :hast •Arlington, it will be a nighty good thing. Of course some may reap an advantage: for example, land restricted to business will naturally become of greater value. But unless some section is really injured he is very retch in favor of the proposed zoning of the town. 1r. Murray Now lives in a single family house. Puts forth the proposition that individual taxes for a period of years furnish a pretty accurate ;uage as to the burdens being shouldered by a town or city. It .nae been stated that the erection of two.. family houses will occasion an added tax burden to the people of Lexington. In ,onerville, the city crowded full of two and three deckers, have individual taxes been doubled during the last 10 or 15 years? It is thought unlikely. " iow about Lexington?" Mr. :;ongeon:-d Mates ho can answer the above question. He moved here just 15 years ago. ills taxes were then 4147.00. ' belay on the sane property his taxes are )295.00. Ur. 'urray:— From the above figures it would not appear that C_ornerville e s two and three deckers have added a tax burden that Lex- ington with its single family houses has escaped. Quotes the tax rate of Cambridge as being 19.50 15 years ago and only $:50.00 now. Thinks two-family houses can be taxed to pay for all increased municipal expenses; perhaps not directly, but through the high rents their inmates pay the owners. He believes thoroughly in two-family houses which if built of a certain type and with proper restrictions would be of a distinct advantage to the town. '.to belong to Attropo1itan Boston: we must give everyone a chance to live here with us. 1 r. oudley 3urphy: States that the tax rate of 1 inchester has scarcely increased in the last 20 years, which he considers one of the best arguments for zoning. Mr. ,auk :— Takes exceptions to the figures quoted by Mrs xongeon as indicating the increased burdens being carried. V<e must remember that every 38 cents of the tax paid in 1908 is the equiva- lent quiva.lent of each dollar paid today. Mr. L. Ellsworth fierce:— States he built here because he wished to live in the country. Has noticed that many LAsmerville people have none likewise and because they wished to live in single houses. ";€1 have now the opportunity to reserve Lexington for a residential town. In his opinion if the tentative plans are open to criticism it is from the fact that too much space has been alloted to double houses. Mr. laclsaae:-- Believes in zoning but also in fair play. there should be as mush ssilea;ge devoted to double houses as to single. Desires maps mailed that problems nay be studied by all. Mrs. t:iaynard s-- Thinks too much attention is being given to financial aspect of the case and not enough to the location, setting, and appearance. Most double houses are not lived in by their owners, which means rapid depreciation of the property. Mr. Holts-- Agrees with a previous speaker that the child- ren are the wealth of the town, but avers it is their quality and not their numbers that count. One good man is worth a hundred hoodlums. Mr. ':!o■uld remind Mr. dolt that It was "the hoodlums" who went over the top while the elite got soft government positions. war "r. Alex. ' ilson:.- Doesn't wish to throw cold eater on the plans and work of the Planning Board but thinks the whole evening has been a waste of time. There is no necessity for any regulations, things may be trusted to work themselves out: the poor mechanic will not try to build alongside Er. Blake, for instance, nor will the latter be inclined to dwell among; the mechanics. M Besides you can't tell a man what kind of a house he can build on his property, and what kind he cannot. Nor if you could would such regulations retain effective. Money talks, and any desired proposition would be easily arranged for . You can rule out stores from a district but if the people want them they will go in despite zoning. In his opinion all these matters and all new developments can be more properly taken care of by the Board of uurvey. As to tax burdens, the answer to that is in the proper Board of Assessors. Thinks stores at intersections tend to lessen danger from speeding autos. Suggests they could be set back to prevent con- gestion from parked vehicles. .Jr. !msry takes friendly exceptions to a number of hr. ' ilson's statements and in oonclusfon (several people having left the Hall) asks for a showing of hands first by those favoring business restrictions and nothing else. 5 hands are raised. Then, by those favoring the general scheme as set forth by the Planning Board, including both business and residences. 28 hands are raises Hearing adjourned at 10:45 o'clock. riillard D. Brown, Secretary. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Jan. 11, 1924. 10 The regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on Friday evening, January 11th at 7:45 o'clock, there being present Messrs . Emery, Tilton, W.D. Brown, Hartman and Duffy. STRRET Dr. Tilton reports having met with but one re- fusal, that of Mr. Denham, in connection with Muzzey Street set-backs, all others being most enthusiastic. The Old Belfry Club will prob- ably take favorable action very shortly leaving the only others to be secured the Telephone Company and the Lexington Associates, whose signatures are expected. DRAFT OF ZONING BY-LAWS Mr. Hartman presents a tentative draft of a set of Zoning By-Laws which were very carefully gone over and discussed. These s:rill be redrafted and further considered at the next meeting. NOTICE TO VOTERS A rough draft of explanatory notice to voters to accompany by-laws was considered and it was de- cided to include with this a copy of the enabling- act. SPECIAL TOWN MEETING As it seems wise to get the Zoning Problem disposed of before the Annual Town Meeting in March , it was decided, if such action met with their approval, to ask the Selectmen to call a Special Town Meeting for this purpose to be held on Monday, February 11th. BUSINESS ZONES AT INTERSECTING STS. As the time before the above meeting seems too short in which to prepare carefully studied plans of the best treatment of Business Zones at Intersecting Streets, it was thought best not to attempt to incorporate with the zoning map any detailed plans of this nature but to undertake this work later in connection with building line restrictions. CHANGES IN TENTATIVE ZONING MAP As a result of the hearings and conversations with citizens it was decided to make the following changes in the zoning map as prepared and shown. (a) As the owners along Woburn Street had ex- pressed a preference for single family dwellings, because there is at present no double house development in this locality, and as the demand for single houses is evident, the semi-detached zone was here eliminated and changed into one for single family dwellings . (b) The stretch from Maple to Curve Street was changed from a semi-detached to a single family district. 10 (c) Business from Curve Street down was per- mitted on both sides of the street. (d) On consideration it seemed best to leave the business zone on Concord Hill as originally laid down. Meeting adjourned at 11:15 Willard D. Brown, Secretary PLANNING BOARD MEETING Jan. 18, 1924. The regular weekly Meeting of the Planning Board was held at the Town Hall on Friday evening, Jan. 18th at 7:45 40 o'clock, there being present Messrs. Emery, L.S. and W.D. Brown. Mr. Trani, in company with Mr. Wadman, appeared before the Board, the former having been directed by the Selectmen, he said, so to do, in consequence of his appeal from Mr. Wadman' s decision to hold back a permit for him to erect a store on Mass . Avenue near Maple Street (tentatively reserved for single dwellings until action by the Town in regard to the establish- ment of zones) . He also desired assurance that the 20' set- backs would be established. This the Board could not give. Mr. Trani stated, however, that he would set his building back 20 feet but he could not be persuaded to either delay his operations a short time or make any effort to secure some other location in the proposed business area even though such locations would appear more advantageous from a business stand- point. 111 Mr. Wadman submitted the following interesting figures in regard to two-family houses in Lexington: From 1914 to 1922 inclusive there were built here 383 single houses, 11 two-family houses: in the year up to 1924 there were built 57 single houses and two two-family houses. Mr. Hartman and Mr. Duffy then sat in with the Board and the balance of the evening was devoted to consideration of zoning. The tentative explanatory draft prepared by Mr. Emery designed to accompany the By-Laws to be mailed the citizens of Lexington, met with the approval of all, with minor changes to be made later. Mr. Hartman then presented his revised and completed set of proposed zoning By-Laws which were carefully gone over article by article, considered from all angles and discussed at length. Under Section II it was felt that the 60 and 50 percentage of areas allowed to be built upon for business structures was too stringent and these were tentatively changed to 75% and 65%. 40 Under Section 15 it was thought that the last clause: "and no signs shall be displayed except small professional signs where such necessary use is professional," should be stricken out. Section 16 giving the farmer the right to erect on his own property stalls for the sale of his own products, was considered with great care from the farmer 's standpoint, from the neighbor- hood standpoint, from the standpoint of the local store people, and the public at large. It was left standing as written until further consideration. APSection 17 was amended to read: "Hotels, as distinct from apartment houses, where permitted under this By-Law shall contain no arrangements of any description for private cooking or house keeping." Section 18, Article I was amended to read: "Permit the alteration of a one-family house or building wherever located to accommodate more than one family." Section 18, Article II "one year period" was substituted for two-year period suggested. Section 19, Destruction by fire or other accident of a non- conforming building was changed from 60% or more of Its assessed value to read : "65�.4 of its value." Despite the careful and prolonged discussion given each section, all felt the need of further reflection and consideration and it was agreed before any final action was taken, to hold a special meeting on next Friday afternoon, January 25th at 2:30; this to be followed in the evening with the regular meeting at 7 :45 o'clock. All present agreed to be present. Meeting adjourned at 11:30 o'clock. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. 1111 PLANNING BOARD MEETING Jan. 25, 1924. 41 A meeting of the Planning Board was held on Friday afternoon at 2:30 o'clock at the Town Hall, there being present Messrs . Emery, L.S. and W.D. Brown of the Board, with Mr. Hartman and Mr. Duffy. BUILDING LAW COMMITTEE Mr. Custanee of the Committee on Revision of Town Building Laws calls up to say that although that Committee has held its last meeting, it will be glad to consider any matter that the Planning Board may want included. TOWN )1I 6.6 1 LA V Mr. Emery states that the Selectmen desire the Special Town Meeting to be called for February 18th, and that they wish to include in the warrant other matters than zoning. Mr. Hartman reports that he understands the Attorney-General prefers Zoning to be considered in a meeting called solely for that purpose; but inquiry at his office discloses that no ruling to this effect has ever been made. NO ADDITION TO N DEF IN IT IONS Mr. Har tman's Revised By-Laws are then taken up and con- sideration is given the suggestion of Mr. John Fox that to the definitions set forth should be added something to the effect that: "Reference is made to the Building Laws of the Town for any neces- sary definitions not above covered." it seemed best to the Board, however, to avoid tying up the Zoning By-Laws to the Building Laws, and as all appeared clear as written, there seemed no reason for following out this suggestion, and the definitions stand as written. ! ANUFACTURING ZONE A letter from Mr. Bassett reviewing the proposed draft ad- vises the inclusion of a small manufacturing section as a measure of safety. This feeling having also been brought out at the hearings and elsewhere, the Board decides to add such a section to be listed and described as follows: 40 M I .. Light manufacturing, employing electricity for a motive power, utilizing hand labor and/or quiet machinery and processes, free from neighborhood disturbing odors and/or agencies and em- ploying not more than twenty employees, in any single and segre- gated building unit, is permitted within any manufacturing zone. It was decided also to set aside for the purpose of light manufacturing the area running south from Summer Street on each side of the Railroad tracks to a depth of 150 feet and extending to within 300 feet of the brook. MAP The Secretary reports the feeling of Mr. Ballard that a map should be prepared and sent out with the notices and By-Laws, and reports of his willingness to assume the expense thereof; and, 41 Mr. Duffy stating it was possible to prepare such a map in the time at hand, it was voted so to do; the various zones being heavily outlined and indicated each by its proper symbol, after the style of the Brookline Map. BUSINESS ZONES AT INTERSECTIONS Mr. Bassett advises in reference to suggested treatment of business zones at intersections that he doubts if Zoning Ordinances can so take over the land for the necessary set-backs with no claims for damages on the part of owners. SET...BACKS In reference to the set-backs suggested for building lines under Section 21, the Board, after considering similar provisions in other ordinances, decides to retain the set-back of 20 ft. previously agreed upon. LETTER FROM MR. FOX Mr. Hartman reads full letter received from Mr. John Fox reviewing the tentative draft and with suggestions and criticisms, B..LAWS The By-Laws were then taken up section by section. PART I SECTION I changed to read and sc approved "and to lessen the dangers from fire, congestion and confusion and to improve and beautify the town, the Town of Lex- ington is hereby divided into five classes of zones or districts defined and bounded on the zoning map prepared . . . ... " Meeting adjourned from 6 to 7:45 at which latter session Dr. 41 Tilton was able to be present and the consideration of. the By-Laws was continued. PART I SECTION 2 Definitions all approved. PART II Use Regulations Page 2 11, manufacturing 1, light manufacturing added to list of districts . SECTION 3 5 "or" changed to "and". 6 added at end: "and bulletin boards accessory to uses specified in above paragraphs 2 and 4. With these changes approved. SECTION 4 Approved without changes SECTION 5 Approved without changes SECTION 6 5 to read "Banks, barber and hair dressing shops, restaurants, bakeries, shoe repair and polishing shops, and manicuring parlors." 7 to read "Lumber, fuel and ice establishments." 9 to read "Garages for storage or repairs, stables, blacksmiths wheelwrights, harness, carpenter, paint and plumbers ' shops." With these Changes approved. SECTION 7 M I districts added and as drafted during the afternoon. PART III Height Regulations Page 4. SECTION 8 (formerly 7) 111 (A) and (B) approved. SECTION 9 (formerly 8) (A) and (B) approved xr�h PART IV Area Regulations Page 4 SECTION 9 Omitted entirely as it was agreed sufficient restric- tions imposed by setbacks called for hereinafter, to- gether with side line set-backs provided under building laws. 41 SECTION 10 Approved as revised by Mr. Hartman limiting lots to 5000 sq. ft. SECTION 11 Amended to read and so approved:- "In Cl districts e.djoining dwelling districts ,» no building,et PART V Accessory Uses Page 5 SECTION 12 Amended to read and so approved:- "All accessory uses and buildings shall be on the same lot with the building of the owner and shall be such as do not alter the character of the premises on which they are located." SECTION 13 Approved as revised by Mr. Hartman and substantially as written. SECTION 14 Approved SECTION 15 (old numbdr) omitted. SECTION 15 Discussed again at great length but with no decision* arrived at. Left for determination at next meeting. SECTION 16 Approved PART VI Exceptions Page 6 SECTION 17 Approved in entirety. 40 PART VII General Provisions Page 6 SECTION 18 Approved »4« SECTION 19 Approved SECTION 20 Set-Back - Approved as rewritten by Mr. Hartman and further amended by Mr. Emery and calling for "front yards with a depth of at least 20 ft. and fronting on all 'ways' whether on accepted highways or in development schemes." SECTION 21 "or by easements, covenants or agreements" omitted. Approved as so changed. SECTION 25 Approved SECTION 24 Approved SECTION 25 Approved SECTION 26 Approved SECTION 27 Added "and to the effect that the invalidity of any section, clause, etc., shall not invalidate the entire By-Lave" Approved. REMAINING PREPARATIONS With the Town Meeting due on February 18th all notifications for same must be out by the lith, which means that everything must be in the hands of the printer by the 6th or 7th. Mr. Vienot has agreed to print the necessary 2500 copies for $100.00. At the regular Planning Board Meeting, February 11th, the final draft of the By-Laws: the introductory notice which the Board has approved as to its general lines and which Mr. Emery will have completed at that time; as well as the map which Mr. Duffy will have completed, can be given final examination and approval. CONCORD HILL BUSINESS ZONE Further consideration was given the business zone allotted the Concord Hill District, and in so much as no accurate determin- ation can be made at this time as to the line of development in this area, it was agreed to leave the store which for the present serves the community sufficiently well, as a"non-conforming build- ing" with the idea that when the need for a business zone arises 4I its proper location can be determined with better judgment. BEDFORD ST. BUSINESS ZONE Mr. Hartman reiterates his contention that no change to a ..5►. residential district for that section apposite the Garage would be upheld by the Courts, and that any such desired use should be made by means of private restrictions. Meeting adjourned at 11 o'clock. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Feb. 1, 1924. 41 The regular meeting of the Planning Board was held at the Town Hall on Friday evening, February 1st at 7:45 o'clock; there being present Messrs. Emery, L.S. and W.D. Brown, and Dr. Tilton of the Board, together with Mr. Hartman and Mr. Duffy. ARTICLE FOR TOWN WARRANT The following article, prepared by the Chairman for insertion in the Tovm Warrant, was read, accepted and given to Miss Gallagher. "To see if the Town, upon report and recommendation of the Planning Board, or otherwise, will vote to amend the By-Laws of the Town by adding thereto one or more articles for restriction of particular Glasses of buildings and buildings to be used for particular purposes to and for excluding them from specified districts or zones of the Town, under the provision of Chapter 40, Section 25 to 30 inclusive, and Chapter 143 Section 3 of the General Laws of Massachusetts, or act in any manner in relation thereto," CARY MEMORIAL BUILDING SITE The Chairman then related meetings and conversations between Mr. Leroy Brown and himself and Mr. Clapp, Chairman of the Board of Trustees for the Proposed Cary Memorial Budding, as a result of which it was voted:-. That the Chairman be authorized to communicate through Mr. Clapp with the Trustees, asking that the same consideration be given the "Paul Revere Tavern" site as has already been given the other suggested sites, and arranging for a meeting at which he may discuss the matter with them. SHALL CARY MEM. ARTICLE HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER ZONING? The Chairman reports that Mr. Clapp, having inserted an article in the Warrant asking for a Committee of Conference in 41 respect to the proposed building, is strongly insistent that this article be the first to be considered at the meeting, even agreeing to this end to forego the planned presentation of lantern slides and other exhibits. It is the unanimous feeling of the Planning Board that inas- much as this special meeting had been asked for by them and as the immediate adoption of the Zoning Regulations is of the utmost importance to the welfare of the Town; and as, moreover, the Cary Memorial Trustees had already had ample time and opportunities to come before the Town, that consideration of the Planning Board's article should take precedence to all else: and it was voted: That the Chairman express to Mr. Clapp the sentiment of the Board and ask him to defer action relative to Cary Memorial Building until the question of Zoning has been settled. OUTLOOK CLUB To impress on the women voters the importance of the Zoning question the President of the Outlook Club and the Chairman of its Civics Committee are communicated with and tentative arrange- ments agreed upon for a special meeting of the Club at which one of the members of the Planning Board shall explain what is proposed for Lexington. LETTERS TO THE PRESS The "Times" having offered two columns of its space for an exposition of the Zoning scheme, Mr. Hartman reads the draft of the first of two articles he had prepared for this purpose. It is the opinion of the Board, however, that s single article appearing the week before the Town Meeting, without the historical background and confined to the Results to Lexington of the proposed Zoning Ordinance, will be more effective. The Board also feels that the article should appear in the "Minute Man" as well, even though it may be necessary to pay for the privilege. FINANCES The Walker Lithograph Company have agreed to print 2500 copies of the Zoning Map for $100.00. This is agreed to by the Committee and Mr. Duffy is authorized to offer $p5.00 additional for 300 extra copies; also to arrange for having them deliver the maps folded. Mr. Vienot has agreed to print 2500 notices of the Committee 's Report for $100.00. Something extra will be needed for ad- ditional copies which the Committee feel it will be advisable to have on hand for distribution at Town Meeting. Bills for past printing, etc., remain to be paid. To meet the above situation Mr. L.S. Brown offers to advance $300.00 towards meeting these expenses which, with Mr. Ballard's offer I/ to pay for the map, should take care of the financial problems until such time as the Planning Board may be reimbursed by the Town. BY»LAWS Mr. Hartman presents copies of By-Laws revised in accordance with previous decisions of the Board and with some additional w+.3,ar Changes incorporated since the last meeting. After full con- sideration and with changes noted below, the By-Laws are given final approval. SECTION I amended to read: . the Town of Lexington, under the pre. visions of the General Laws of Massachusetts including Chapter 40, Sections 25 to 30 inclusive, and Chapter 145, Section 3, is hereby divided into . , dated Feb. 18, 1924 SECTION 4 to read: Section 4, R I districts (one family dwellings). The follow- ing buildings and uses permitted:- 2 » added since last meeting and approved. SECTION 5 to read: Section 5, R 2 districts (double dwellings). All buildings and uses permitted under R I, together with the following:- SECTION 6 to read: Section 6, R 3 districts (two..family dwellings) . All build- ings and uses permitted under R I and R 2 and the following: SECTION 7 to read: Section 7, C I districts (retail stores, offices, etc.). All buildings and uses permitted under R I, R 2, R 3, and the following: 5 Rewritten with additions and approved. SECTION 16 amended to read as follows and so approved: "A stall or stand for selling farm and garden produce may be permitted as an accessory use in R districts but only on property of the owner and for the sale of his own products; and where such accessory use shall not impair the neighbor- hood nor tend to cause obstruction of a highway." SECTION 18 "the Board of Selectmen" substituted for "Board of Appeal, etc." in previous draft. 1. changed from previous draft to read: "to accommodate two families" Mr. Hartman thinking more than this exceedingly dangerous. In view, however, of the re- striction 'to improve the neighborhood' the required public hearing, the -written approval of the Planning Board, and other safeguards, it was voted to adhere to the former de- cision and it was voted to substitute for 'two families' 'more than one family. ' .,3» 4. Former sub»item (4) omitted entirely. SECTION 19 changed by Mr. Hartman to read: "No non-conforming use or building shall be restored, repaired or altered to an extent of more than 60 percent of its assessed value in any ten year period." 60 percent raised to 65% and the word assessed stricken out. SECTION 21 changed to read and so approved: no new building or structure shall be con- structed and no building or structure snail be moved, altered, reconstructed or enlarged so that a front yard less in depth shall result; the word structure referring to stalls per- mitted under Section 16. SECTION 26 newly added and amended as follows: the line "in so far as such permit or decision creates a danger from fire or injuriously affects life, health and morals" stricken out, the reference to the Statutes in Sec.. tion I making any qualification of this kind superfluous. The conclusion of the Section to read: "may, by giving the Building Inspector and the Board of Appeal notice in writing within ten days from the date of the issuance of the permit or of the decision appealed from, appeal to the Selectmen, or to such offer, board, commission or committee as shall be appointed or designated by the Selectmen to act as a Board of Appeal, who shall give notice and a public hearing before rendering a de- eision and shall keep a record of their decision and the reasons therefor. " IN CONCLUSION The general preamble preparad -by the Chairman having met with the approval of the Board, Mr. Hartman agrees to get his re- revised draft of the By-Laws to Mr. Emery on Saturday that the notices may be immediately placed in the hands of the printers. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 11:30. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. I y�inY PLANNING BOARD MEETING Feb. 8, 1924. 40 The regular weekly meeting of the Planning Board was held on Friday, February 8th at 7:45 P.M., there being present Messrs . Emery, L.S. and W.D. Brown and Mr. Duffy. The printed By-Laws and map were carefully reviewed and approved. The order of proceedure in the doming Town Meeting was discussed and it was the feeling of all that Zoning should, if possible, take precedence over the other articles in the warrant; and to this end Mr. Emery agreed to see Mr. Bayley and ascertain if he be willing to give way in respect to the article relative to printing valua- tions. The matter of arranging for suitable speakers at the meeting was also gone over. Det NTTNG ADJOURNED AT 11. P.M. Willard. D. Brown, Secretary. WDB/?SID PLANNING BOARD MEETING Feb• 15, 1924. The regular meeting of the Planning Board was held at the 41 Town Hall on Friday evening, February 15th at 7:45 o'clock, there being present Messrs . Emery, L.S. and Y.D. Brown, Dr. Tilton and Mr. Duffy. The reactions to the published ByLaws which have been in the hands of the voters since last Saturday and which reactions have been most earnestly and carefully considered in informal conferences since they first began to come in, were taken up for* wally and as a result it was voted to present at Town Meeting, together with the proposed By-Laws, the following amendments: a. To combine R 2 and R 3 districts so that Sec. 6 is eliminated and Sec. 5 becomes Sec. 5 R 2 districts (double and" two-family dwellings) . All buildings and uses permitted under R 1 and the following: 1. Double dwellings 2. Two family dwellings 3. Hotels and boarding houses 4. Fire and police stations. b• Sec. 7 becomes Sec. 6, the designation R 3 being omitted. c• Sec. 8 becomes Sec. 7, the designation R 3 being omitted. r d• See. 9 and Sec. 10 become Sections 8 and 9. o. Sec. 11 becomes Sec. 10 and the designation R 3 is omitted: the objection that 5000 sq. ft. per dwelling was too drastic not borne out by Mr. Duffy's figures which showed that in a large group of cases checked up by him, although the original lot plans had been smaller 'here was only one case in which the small land owners had not purchased at least two parcels, giving them in every case lots approximately 5000 ft. sq. f. Sec. 12 becomes Sea. 11 and the designation R 3 is omitted. Although our building laws allow second class construction to occupy the entire lot, it was felt that despite objection raised, the shading off of business into residential districts obtained under this section as written should be preserved. g. Sections 16, 14, 15, 16, and 17 become Sections 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 respectively. h. Section 18 becomes Section 17 and the phrase in third line reading: "will tend to improve the status of the neighborhood" amended to read: "will not tend to impair the status of the neighborhood." 1. Section 19 becomes Section 18 and owing to hardships arising under it and objections raised all but the opening paragraph eliminated so that the section as amended will read: "Section 18 Non«conforming uses. Non-conforming uses or buildings shall not be altered or extended except upon written approval of the Planning Board, a public hearing duly advertised, and a permit signed by the Selectmen." MO j. Section 20 becomes Sec. 19. k. Section 21 eliminated altogether, it appearing wiser to obtain releases in manner already proving so successful. 1. Sections 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 2?, 28 and 29 become respectively Sections 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27 respectively. Some objections having arisen as to the limited territory offered for manufacturing, it appearing that said territory ex- tended some 1400 feet in length with a total width of 3001 ft., in all 420,000 sq. ft. or well over 9 acres; and inasmuch as no other section suggested but would be injurious to nearby rest« dential areas, it was decided to leave further additions open to the desires of the citizens. It also appearing that the land about Grapevine corner owned by Mr. McIntosh had already been restricted for business to only 100 feet and that he had already disposed of a 100 foot property at the Spring Street junction for business purposes, it was dem cided to provide an additional business zone at this latter point of 100 feet in length. The Board feeling that the wishes of the citizens so far as they had been known had been most carefully considered and prom posed amendments agreed upon to carry out the wishes of all, without endangering the benefits of the Ordinances as a whole, the meeting adjourned at 10:15. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. 4, February 22, 1924. JCI1<IT =TM FLAMM M BOi RD MID COEFZRE5CE COMUITTEE 10 In answer to the call of the ;secretary of the Planning Board the first joint ?meeting of that Board and the Conference Cairn=itte€ appointed at the Town Meeting on Feb-ruary i$th, was held in the Selectmen's Room of the Town Hall at 7:45 o'clock on Friday evening, February 22nd, the foll.ew1xs,-^; 1701113 in attendance:- Il mnin :, .Board - Molsrs. Emesry, L.S. & iIsD Brown, Dr. Tilton Torn Engineer - Mr. J. HemYry Duffy Co mforerto) Co:m ittube Q Messrs . McIntosh, VitAnan, Cutler, Kilgomf Harrington arid Harrod. The matter of organization and procedure is dis- aw;sed an,: it is agreed to start in iaformAlly with Mr. Emery in the chair. Stating t:aat there se ime to have developed two fundamental objections to the nanni.rsz Board's reoommenda.- tions, the ehiair aaks for an informal expression of opinion cr the following propositions:- 1st. Ai. single .coside itiaa. zone for all class .e of dwellings, including two-family and double houses, as against two residential zones one for single family dwellings only. and. Should the area allotted manufacturing bo elaterially increased. 00 After a full. ex'essior of opinion on the above questions, the organization of a now joint Cammtttee in aoaordande with the vote p3 at the Town Meeting is effected; of whioh Coi it tee Mr . Terery is elected C'.::airre n and W. D. Brown, Clerk. . Emery brings to the attention of those peeaent the naticeo for the Be rinos fcr lenday eight wb.iell the Planning Board has had published in the two local papers. .A11 agree that with the ohcrtxi se of time intervening before again oohing before the Town that one well-Attended :nearing is to be preferred. to more. That this result may be attained all present agree and so vote to share equally ale ezpense of printing and addressing notioes whioh the Coatrman agrees to have done that they may go out to ell the voters ie l:c)nda 7 mornings s meil,- truing that the Torn will later see fit to re-imburne the Committee for the expevoe inenr-wed. It is thought best. aloe. to take no formal aeti.on of any kind until after the citizens have had a fur- ther °hence to express themselvee at the kBearing. The sugger tl or of ore eenervl reeidentiel zone IP as opposed to two reetrioted zones is discussed st length end the following a uggest:.or of Nr. Ellgomfaeerw to furnish grounds for a belief that the varying ideas of the members #5 may be reconciled, namely :- that the residential districts be substantially as set forth by the Planning Board, pro- however, any neighbor- hood that at any time hereafter i-' 1 neighbor- hood rr y, `:.ith the consent of a certain percentage of Le land-ovuere therein,ein , together with that of a leouor percent- age of the abutting land-owners, apply to the 3eleetmon, or the properly dosignetcd Board, for permission to come under the R 2 claesif ica.ticn; thus scouring local option for the various nei.ghbonceode affected. 60 divergent, however, were the views of the members in regard to the extent and location of territory that might be allotted for manufacturtpurposes that a common ground on which all might agree seemed to present difficulties of attainment. Mr. Harrington end Mr. Harrod, being in agreement that the people of East Lexington would not cb jcot to a manufacturing district along both sides of the Railroad tracks from a point below the East Lexington station to the rise in land at Maple Btreet, careful consideration is given to this location. Except es regards the number of w ployoes mention- * ed, the majority of the Conference Committee express them- selves as being satisfied with the definition of Light Manufacturing as appearing in the Planning Boardlo report. #4 M, ett g adjourned at 12:15 until Tuesday 41 evening, FebfuAry 23th, at Cary Willard D. Drvirn Clerk. 41 honday Lvein.ine, Fobr't Ary 28, 1924. 40 ."..t 8:00 ctclock, some 85 poroorr boin in attiand- : moo, ;Tmery o.�-11a the r,t.c ti; , to or,: r# t nd Isks for rolawrk:s, gw;stions and criticisms. suggesting ',hit all L;pc.ftkers be brief "id to the point. i - 1 :- Owns pr()perty on Bedford 3treets opposite low triangular area, just above air h: r na, rh1oh has bean zoned for business. ahould prefer this restricted for dwellings. there alrosA ).y being a la7 teal trusiness cont .'c at &ntpuon 1 . orrici'. %. • i3 rril3 : . 1)003 not care to say anything. Cal . Childs:- TU-;d<:v zoninz ;iQheme business allowed only on both sides of drive leading to akimnrii:s.$t Lexington Station, =.- li4nn property is tead by the B & M RY. Suggests a sort ata numb,.x of feet, say 500, b:, alloyed for buainoas on Massuchasotts avenue on oithe r aido of drive. Owns 160 fact froutago him olf end v.a.nta room to 40 exp .*nd .is business. 0_.ns to lots; 411 x 160t deep in all. adtjoin- ing :r. C .ildaa e. Ie planning to civet a r K,. 412411:-:`"' A:u:o►'o and 2aa applied far larni t. Lot too C0onT snail for dwelling; rould :Alio a stretch • for business 201 foot from drivo to etr.,tion. whish would take acre of botll htnaolf And ;1r. 01, 2,1ds. BB Rlzo owns entire point at lunation of nollan L<ye d and lia►ssacbsotte zavonue, sone 35,000 ft. w..toh he bo't t *tot years ago for amara ial development. and or which be bee expond d quite a few t cusond dollar a. The ;;F'lost ve1unblo sit() am- where around for buainosa purposes; not fit for dwellinca on account of drainica. ry• l:; td� '' Asks if there is any hl.n in tile 8y4aws por- mIttir4 one-family houaozs to bo allancod to tt o. family houses. . flvnn: u duggests tk: .t old houses tlukt mi^„ht bo so wed be cpeoitioally named in By.Lar r. 14=0, .,pain c is ,-, Lopes the Cotes littoc will givo smious con-► aidorstian to the needs of manufacturing pnd sire considerable ahtnges in extat of areas allotted for this purpose. Tbe present immolated not one too invite Menufastgriag. IP MIdesirable manufaoturioa, mach an glue worth fertiliser planta, to. might be specifically excluded. ro ob jeoti gin to sane on easterly side IQ '. L t.0 air ' lAilrocd Vonao o o tte Awa.ingten its. IP North th of V, a Lua cr Ccoapany there to ale° twallablc 3 vnd that 'would bring in taxable property if devoted to this purpose. ;yea to one and two-tamp a y houseot oucceote some scheme whereby the vsae:tour cooti.ono of the town might determine t .4r own alaSsitisat I on, on tsar 00;.: vote of tto;e oreeent and voting at a wi hboer good ho :ri.nc. Moro nicht be tiv) or six zones dr wn up for tills pow.. BrA, BevIev:- Ingalls.* bow areas maybe whiweed 'ender awmect— od -malars. ThinPs codon a iglit rice sstibow bordering tiny neighborhood might claim to bo strootea. Iwo ilk Inquires if sate= of employees io to be limited to 20. You can't ox'*at any community to mow unless it meters eono attest: to cttr .Qt rer ifacturoro. You'vo cot to find v,or . ter the people to do. s.• Inquires wbr' t is to be done vitb the lost Lexington m .dt s. IP In;ells4w Tauid like h. .a rec s -?lt►ton passed on t9 tbe mrd £'car a o s orat lon♦ lir. Flynn:- The ?last Lexington entrance to Lexington very uninviting. We ehould do all we can to im- IP prove it, and m nufaoturing does riot tend to do so but would be a great injury to the whole town. On the other side of the tracks there would not be ac -mob. of an objection. Mr. Spauldire:- Says land runs back of where he lives for nearly a mile before residences are reached; far enough from street not to be an eye sore . The low land back of Curve Street can never be used. save for manufacturing. Thinks any scheme restricting territory but allowing menu- fecturere to core in after appeal to the town would be antagonistin to their coming. Would prefer territory left t open to them. Mt . Bayley:. Calls attention to lad'7e of penalty; in no By-Law examined by him hae this been la.oking. The Ac; it .tip=lf woetbee of study As he reads it, it merely mens the preserving the town as it io, end eat meant to 1 !t it. up to a higher level. IP Approves of Mr. Opauldineo ideas - better to develop the town u ; than to riahhe things too difficult first. Mr. Bayle Calls attention to unequal trontra:nt on ( Cont'di opposite sides of tame street. 10 lone of the development schemes save that at Grape Vine Corner allor for anything but one- family hovaaa. heed Street, for instance, has nothing but one-family houses. a1 decisions should be loft as in V inebestor to the Board of 6elootmen. hopes the overlapping between building laws and zoning laws may be removed. Mr. '.Train:- Objects to his property being restricted to single family dwellings. Mr. Peckham:- See thousand of visitors yearly who all Morspeak of the beauty of Lexington. All remarks this evening have been from purely selfish re scns . hopes everyone in z11 will stand up for i-nd maintain the beauty of Lexington. Carao fram a maruf a a tur ing town and knows rha t they are. Mr . Dunt - Inquires as to reasons for growth of Waltham, •1 TobUrn, uinvy, Y.inohost r; can taxes be lowered ether! iso than with manufacturivs? Can re pay taxes r:ith the adoption of the .Tlenning Board's atheme? Mr. Dunham:- W r burn street and. Lovell, and Lowell to Arlington line should be for busines . IP Mr . Packard:- Why so much white area on the map? No schools, stores, moving picture houses, etc. , provided. Certain sections in every part of the town should be Prov idod with business sections . Mr. Reed:- Is Reed. Street restricted to one-family houses? This 1;c sentiment of his neighboirs. . Via.no•- I is land opposite the Carr Earns has been re- stricted to one-..family dwellings. Not possible with the Car Barns opposite . Should big un- restricted and o pe , to business as business i.0 on the opposite side of the street. Mr . Cutler:- voA'y tvson within 15 miles so. ry 2onirt, has not been undertaken long ago. Cites Woburn es a horrible example: can tt sell property with a garage or store on next lot. Mc man or woman has ani, right to do anything to injure his neighbors. Meeting adjourned at 10:15 . 1 Willard D. Brown Clerk Feb. 26, 192 a. Joint Meeting Planning Board & Conference Committee . The second meeting of the Joint Committee met at Cary hall on 41 Tuesday evening, Feb. 26, at 8 o' clock, there being present Messrs . Emery, L.S. & W.D. Brown, Kilgour, 1;'adman, Harrington, Cutler, McIntosh and Harrod; Mr. Duffy being present the latter part of the time . The meeting coming to order, Mr. Wadmen reads a draft of a com- plete new set of by-laws he has drawn up and in which only one gen- eral residential section is provided; the various neighborhoods be- ing permitted to settle their own status by vote . The Chaiman points out that this cannot be done under the Zoning ordinances of the Statutes. After an informal expression of feeling on the part of the mem- bers, a vote is taken on the question:- " Do you favor adhereing to the scheme already proposed by the Planning Board of separate single residence and two family residence areas as opposed to one general residence area to include both? " Messrs. 'teadmen, Kilgour, Harrington and Harrod voted in the negative and Cutler, McIntosh, L.S.BroYn, W.D.Brown and Emery in the affirm- ative . As to MANUFACTURINU Mr. Kilgour proposes that it be permitted continuously along both sides of the Railroad tracks from the Arl- ington to the Bedford town lines. On being put to vote this is favored by Messrs . Wadman, Kilgour, Harrington and Harrod and opposed by Messrs . Cutler, McIntosh, L.S.Brorn, i;.D.Brown and Emery. As the minority members refuse to entertain any modification of their proposals as to these two fundamental considerations it would appear that any hope entertained of united action must be given up and majority ed minority reports be submitted instead. Mr. McIntosh urges, however, that the Committee stick together awhile longer and in consequence the balance of the BY-laws are gone over. As to BUSIN1SS AREAS there would appear to be no great divergence • of opinion. The h IUET AND AREA Regulations will prove acceptable when made to conform to the Building Laws, save that the latter shall provide that no lot shall have a frontage of less than 50 feet . Mr. McIntosh suggests that BUSINESS AREAS ON STREET INTERSECTIONS be required to have set back of from 10 to 20 fecy,t. It is also suggested and meets with general favor on the part of the Conference Committee that the 20 foot BUILDING LINES be retained on all streets. tMr. Cutler raises objection to the clause prohibiting obstruc- tion of the street:sadjacent to STALLS. The Chairman explains the reason for LACK OF PENALTY in the by- laws and all present agree that a fine is bound to be ineffective and that the only sure way to stop infractions of the law is by in- junction. Mr. McIntosh feels that set-back restrictions should be placed at once on business zones at intersecting thoroughfares rather than waiting until such restrictions can be arranged for by private nego- tiations. As to the contention that only the Selectmen, the major beard of the town, should have power to grant exceptions, all present agree that the suggested arrangement whereby each Board acts as a check on the other is a preferable arrangement . There is no objection to any of the other arrangements. The Chairman again points out the advantage of a unanirlaus report from the Committee- stating that the Planning Board is more than wil- ling to make concessions to this end, and urges the minority members to meet the situation in the same spirit, Mr. Kilgour replies that the minority will meet by themselves and determine just what they are willing to concede; and a joint meeting is agreed upon for next Monday evening. Meeting adjourned at 12/15 . i+i llard L . brown, Clerk, 10 March 4, 1924. Joint Meeting. Planning Board & Conference Committee . The third meeting of the joint Committee was held in Cary Hall on 'u ;sday evening, March 4, at 8 o' clock; there being present Messrs. Emery, L.S. and W.D. Brown, Kilgour, Harrod, Wadman, Cut- ler, McIntosh, Dr. Tilton, together with ,ir. Worthen and Mr. Duffy who ware elected members of the Planning Board at Monday' s Town Meeting and had duly qualified. Mr. Harrington came in about 9. Mr. Kilgour states the results of the deliberations of the Mi- nority members, further than which they were unwilling to go in the matter of concessions. MANUFACTURING . A strip of land 500 feet in width, running northerly along the Easterly side of the S & M R.R. property and adjoining same , from the Arlington line to within 250 feet of Maple Street . And another strip of same width on Easterly side of R.R. property from the North Lexington Coal Yard to the Jod- ifrrd line . BUSINE ij. In addition to the zones set forth by the Planning Board a zone on Concord Hill for about five stores and adjoin- ing store of Breslin. The adjoining lot on North Hancock Street to zone already proposed. in Last Lexington, from Curve Street to Arlington line on both sides of 4assachusatts Avenue, with the exception of the 'Smith and Dana properties. Also from East Lexington Station to the Rest Inn. RESIDENCES. The remainder of the torn to be devoted to residences, no ' restrictions being laid down as to the types of dwellings. The other three minority members state that Mr. Kilgour has presented their views. in answer to questions from Mr. Worthen as to just what steps had been taken to see that the views of the people affected were represented, Mr. Kilgour states that he has discussed the matter with Mr. Burrill of North Lexington who is in favor of two-fami- ly houses and also with idr. Spaulding of East Lexington who takes the same position. r Mr. Kilgour goes on to state that he believes in one general area for all types of houses;- that neighborhoods can be restrict- ed when the need arises;- he quotes Ir. Baxter to the effect that Milton is willing to take a chance on one general area;- that the people can agree amongst themselves to keep track of property sold and for what purpose . When asked if he is not willing to meet the rest of the com- mittee half way he wants to know just what they propose. He feels set on keeping the town open and meeting conditions when we come to them - otherwise no growth. To say a man cant build a two- family house amounts to confiscation of property; - to forbid the building of stores, manufacturing plants, the establishment of sat-backs, side-line restrictions, etc. is another matter. This he believes in. He suggests that the Town be given the opportunity to select whichever scheme it likes. Mr. Wadman once more inquires as to the objections to a two- family house . It is then moved by Mr. 1i,. S. brown and seconded by the Secre- tary that, agreement being impossible, two reports be prepared and submitted to the Town. In a general discussion before a vote is taken Mr. Worthen states he has no objection to a certain amount of manufacturing in East Lexington; he agres with Mr. Duffy who thinks the ter- ritory might extend 2000 feet beyond the l;ast Lexington Station keeping it about 1000 feet back from Maple St. and thus saving the high land for dwellings. it is suggested, too, that it is unfair to locate manufactur- ing at the foot of hills already built up. Mr. Kilgour agrees to )reduce the width of the strip to 300 ft . but insists that it extend. from the Arlington line to within 250 feet of Maple Street. Mr Brown' s motion is then voted unanimously. 40 Meeting adjourned at 12/15 . Willard D. Brown, Clerk. iviarch 4, 1924. PiANNINu BOARD MELTING. Immediately following the meeting of the Conference Committee 111/ the Planning Board organized for the coming year, Iir. F. L. Umery being re-elected Chairman and W. D. Brown Secretary. Adjourned at 12/30 . Vi i llard D. brown, Secretary. PLANNING BOARD ---1924-1925. Leroy S . Brown Term expired in 1925. Willard D. Brown rr rt ft » Frederick L. Emery rt rr rr rr J. Odin Tilton n n rt rr J. Henry Duffy 'r 't Edwin B. Worthenrr rt rr r► March 7, 1924. MAJORITY GROUP MEETING ZONING CONFERENCE COMMITTEE. 111 The first meeting of the majority group of the Zoning Confer. ence Committee was held at Cary Hall on Friday, March 7, at 7/45 O'clock, there being present Messrs. Emery, L. S. and W. D. Brown, Duffy, Worthen, McIntosh, Cutler and Dr. Tilton. Mr. Kilgour calls up to say his group has decided:. BUSINESS. From Arlington line, on both sides of Mass. Ave. to about Oak Street. Thence to Harrod's store for dwellings . From Harrod's store, on both sides of Ave., to upper end of Curve St. for business. Remaining Business Districta asassigned by Planning Board, save that No. Hancock St. district is extended to include lot of ad- joining owner on that street. And save also that a district for five stores is assigned, along by Breslin's, on Concord Hill. MANUFACTURING. Along Easterly side of R. R. tracks, a strip 300 feet wide, from Arlington line to within 250 feet of Maple Street. A similar strip in North Lexington on Easterly side of tracks from Coal Yard to the Bedford line. DWELLINGS. The remainder of the Town unrestricted for dwellings of any type. It being evident from the above that there is no possibility of an agreement, the members, proceed to a consideration of the By Laws, section by section. SECTION 1. O. K. SECTION 2. (a) 0. K. (b) omitted. (c) becomes (b) to read A TWO FAMILY HOUSE is a detached dwelling intended and designed to be occupied by two families,. (d) becomes (c) (e) becomes (d) 1/ USE REGULATIONS. SECTION 3. "R2, DOUBLE DWELLINGS;" changed to R2, TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS; "f3, TWO FAMILY WELLINGS;" omitted. SECTION 4. 3. "public mud .,�,,,,,,,. " to read public build» Mr Cutler suggests the possibility, as a compromise measure, of permitting 2ND. CLASS two family dwellings, in Rl districts. The sentiment of the Committee, however, is to stick to one fam- ily dwellings. 4 Mr. Worthen inquires as to the taking of boarders which it has been claimed was not permitted. SECTIONS 5 & 6. Combined as Section 5 and;. to readi;- SEC. 5. R2 Districts (Two gamily dwel- lings) 1. Two family dwellings. 2. Hotels & boarding houses. 3. Fire and police stations. SECTION 7. becomes Sec. G, the designation R3 being omitted. SECTION 8. becomes Seo~.. 7, the designation R3 being omitted and the last two lines 'rand. employing not more than twenty employees, in any single and. segre- gatedi unit" being stricken out. HEIGHT REGULATIONS. SECTION 9. becomes Sec. 8. (a) Height limit changed to 40 feet. (b) 0. K. SECTION 10. omitted entirely, both (a( and (b). To be taken care of by the Building Ordinances. AREA REGULATIONS. SECTION 11. becomes Seep. 9 and changed to read;- In RI and R2 districts, land laid out after the adoption of this by-law shall provide a frontage of not less than 50 feet and. an area of not less than 5000 square feet per dwelling. Mr. McIntosh raises question as to determination of frontage on rounding corner lots and this is left to be worked out by Mr. Emery and Mr. Duffy. SECTION 12. becomes Sec. 10 and R3 designation o- mitted. ACCESSORY USES. SECTIONS 13, 14 & 15 become Secs. 11, 12 & 13. SECTION 16. becomes Sec. 14. The last clause "nor tend' to cause obstruction of a highway" stricken out as Coming properly under police regulations. The question of cider and other manufacture& products discussed •� and left to be w.. ._L+y1. out by Mr. Emery. SECTION 17. becomes Sec. 15. EXCEPTIONS. SECTION 18. becomes Sec. 16; and the phrase in third line reading "will tend, to in. jure the status of the neighborhood" amended to read "will not tend to im. pair the status: of the neighborhood." Also the following subsection added. (d) Permit the manufacture of cement blocks or other products from materials man- ufactured or obtained on the premises. GENERAL. PROVISIONS. SECTION 19. becomes Sec. 17; all provisions omitted 11 and changed in accordance with previous decision and with the amendment, of Mr. Clapp, so that the section will read;- N FO See. 17. NON COMING USES. Any building or part of a building which at the time of the adoption of this by-law is being put to, a non-conforming use may continue to be used for the same purpose or one not substantially different, and may be repaired, rebuilt or structually alteret; but no such building shall be extended or enlarged except upon written approval of the planning board, a public hearing duly advertised, and a permit signed by the selectmen. SECTION 20 becomes Sec. 18:. SECTION 21 becomes Sec. 1a and changed to read;- * Sec. 19. SET BACK. In residence dist- ricts designated as R1 and R2, a front yard of at least twenty feet in depth from street line to front line of• porch or building shall be provided etc. etc. Set backs also to be called for at the five business zones coming at street intersections. These to be worked out lir Mr. finery. Provision to be made, possibly in this section, possibly in Sec- tion 2-(e), that present non-conforming buildings may not be re- built within building lines. 410 Although the Planning Board had previously withdrawn this section the opinion of all present seemed to be that it is wiser to retain it, that immediate protection may be had throughout the town. SECTIONS 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29' became respec- tively Seas. 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, ea and 27. The lateness of the hour prevented a lengthy consideration of the Zoning Map. All present seemed to feel, however, that in fairness to the peop le who had built their homes on the East Lexington hills, the entire stretch of territory from the Arlington line proposed by the minority members for manufacturing purposes could not be agreed to; and all felt that a tract of land 300 feet in width along the Easter- ly side of the tracks, from a point opposite Fottler Ave. and exten- ding: to a point 2000 feet N. W. of the East Lexington station would for a long time to come afford sufficient territory in this section for manufactures. The termination of this territory is about 1000 feet back from Maple St. and at the beginning of the high land. The members had no great objection to a manufacturing area in North Lexington as proposed by the minority members. As to the Business Sections in East Lexington no definite conclusions were reached. In North Lexington it appeared wise to allow a business strip on the opposite side of Bedford St. from the Carbarns, to the Coal Yard; and also to extend the strip on the Easterly side to include all of the Burrill property. At Mr. McIntosh's suggestion it was agreed to transfer his entire development, formerly a R2 zone, to the white R1 district. The assignment of additional R2 districts involves so many considerations of the character of the future growth of the various sections that the members seemed to feel unanimously that this had best be left to future determination by these sections when the n eed for such assignment becomes more apparent Meeting adjourned at 12/15. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. i,iar. til, 1924. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. The regular meeting of the Planning Board was held in the Select- men' s Room, Friday evening, March 21st. , at 7/45 o' clock, there be- ing present Messrs. Emery, Tilton, Duffy, L.S. & W.D. Brown. 41 Waltham Cars. Dr. Tilton points out the grave danger at the junction of t.altham Street and Mass. Ave. due to the position of the wait- ing cars and which will be greatly aggravated when the new Post Office is opened. Cars should be compelled to stop 150 feet back from Mass. Ave. The enforcement of the No Parking rale would be helpful. Mr. Emery, who some time ago took this matter up with the Selectmen, agrees to communicate with them again. Set back. The Chairman also agrees to see if he can obtain from Mr. Hunt his agreement to proposed set-back on raltham St. to the end that this may be used as a meansof securing from Mr. Al- drich the set-back of the proposed new block on the opposite . corner. Billboards. Mr. Cotton is interviewed in regard to billboard legisla- tion, - a letter from Samuel Hoar to the Concord Selectmen is read, - and the Board agrees to prepare for the Tarrant for the next Town Meeting an article on the lines suggested by Ur. Hoar - er on more drastic lines; and to take no action rela- tive to three applications,raow pending, for new billboards, ( not allowed under the Zoning ordinances ) until after the latter have been 0. Kd. by the Attorney General. Lex. bldg. Trust Plans. Mr. Richards, for the Lexington Building Trust, asks the Planning board' s apwroval of a general lay-eut of streets, the details to be worked out later. No street shown is over 6g grade according to Mr. Kellaway and Mr. Wetherbee, and no lots less than 6000 sq. ft. or than a 60 foot frontage. 4, The board votes to approve lay-out submitted which is en- titled:- '} Lexington building Trust Study for Street.. Herbert J. Kellaway, Landscape Architect, Boston, class. , Nov. 16, '25 " The Board also suggests to ir. Richards that he have his engineer lay mut continuation of streets on adjoining proper- ty and secure the consent of owners to same that lay-out of same may be established by Board of Survey and future devel- opment may be in harmony with that being carried on at present. The desirability of the Building Trust' s securing a por- tion of the rear corner of the Varner lot is discussed. FUTURIi STREETS. It appearing that no fixed policy has never been estab- lished in regard to construction of streets for acceptance by the Town, this matter being left to the judgement of each new Board of Selectmen, it is asreod that a course of pro- ceedure along these lines should be worked out and made a part of the Town By-Laza. :fir. Duffy submits a draft of this sort already worked out by him. Sewer and water construction and extension should also be standardized. BACON LAY-OUT. The plans of the Bacon lay-out near the corner of Mass. Ave. and daple St. and entitled " Plan of Land in Lexington, da s., Dec. 1922, George r. Wetherbee, Jr. , Civil Engineer," is examined and not approved. The Secretaryis instructed to communicate with the Board of Survey and suggest that they write ;fir. Bacon to the effect that inasmuch as,- 1 .- the lots do not conform to the requirements of the new Zoning Law, 2,- the future extension of rear street to Maple St. would not give sufficient depth to lots on ad- joining property, and S.- these future extensions are not indicated on the plan, that he or his engineer confer with the Town Engineer and see if a more logical and better lay-out may not be worked out and one covering the above points. BUILDING LIKES. In connection with the establishment of Building Lines on Bedford St. , Muzzey St. , Clarke St. , and Mass . Ave. , from Clarke to Cedar St. on which the necessary releases have been obtained, the Secretary is instructed to communicate with the Selectmen and ask that the Town Engineer be authorized to prepare or cause to be prepared the plans necessary to make it possible for the Town to act on the petitions secured and to establish building lines as promptly as possible, that the benefit of present signatures may not be lost . EAST LEXINGTON COOP RATION. That a spirit if friendliness and cooperation, may be fur- thered it was suggested that representatives from the two East 1110 Lexington clubs be asked to meet with the Board and discuss any local problems they might have in whose solution the Plan- ning Board might be able to assist. Mr. Duffy agreed to get in touch with members of the two clubs. ATTY. GEN'L. In the absence of the Chairman, Mr. Duffy also agreed to keep in touch with the Tomn Counsel that the zoning ordinance may be submitted to the Attorney General at the very earliest date. Meeting adjourned ( 10 o' clock ) for two weeks, Willard D. Brown, Secretary, d` } April 4, 1924. PLANNING BOARD ME 'TING. Owing, to the use of the Selectmen' s quarters by the Isaac harris Cary Conference Committee the regular meeting of the Planning Board, held on Friday evening, April 4th., was ad- ! journed to the Directors ' Room of the Lexington Trust Company. There were present Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Tilton, L.S. and 'N;.D. Brown. EAST LEXINGTON C ONFERENCE. The representatives from East Lexington, invi- ted to confer with the Board in reference to any lo- "b cal problems, failed to put in an appearance . "iALTHAM STREET. Mr . L. S . Brown brings up the matter of the need for immediate action relative to 1''altham Street. The plan , for the new building are ready and the tenants of the old have been ordered out. per. Aldrich will, he thinks, be willing under suitable arrange- ments to set the proposed building back 8 feet, lining same up with Post Office which is under 10 year' s lease to the Government. This would permit widening the street to a width of 58 feet as far back as Vine Brook Road, the steps of the intervening houses be- ing now 5 and 12 feet back eespectively andthe houses themselves 11 and i6 feet. The Selectmen realize the seriousness of the sit- uation and suggest that one of the Planning Board meet with them on Tuesday night. This Ur. Brown agrees to do. Meanwhile the Chairman will see !Ir. Hunt as to any concessions he may be willing to make . The possibility is suggested of moving the corner block 10 feet nearer the Bank Building, cutting out a portion of the wooden block to do this, and the Sec- retary agrees to obtain an approximate figure as to the cost of so doing. FOREST STREET EXTENSION. The importance of extending Forest Street to Mass . Ave . before the 1925 celebration, and ways and means of securing this result are discussed at length. Mr. Duffy presents figures prepared last year, when the matter was first brought up, showing that on a basis 11 of betterments the cost of this work could be assumed by the Town at little cost. As a first step in this direction it is decided to invite interested property owners to meet with the Plan- ning Board at its meeting next Friday night, that their co-operation, if possible, may be secured; and the Sec- retary is instructed to communicate with Mr. Latimer Seaver, Mr. Alex. M. Tucker, Miss Mary E. Powers and Mr. William Ferguson, the owners affected. BUILDING PERMITS. The Building Regulations in force call for a request for a building permit to be acted on within 10 days. The Planning Board feels that this is too short a time and the Secretary is instructed to communicate with the Chairman of the Committee on Revision of said By-Laws and suggest that this requirement be amended to read something as follows .- " unless in special instances instructed by the Selectmen to the contrary." Also that if work is not proceeded to completion with- in six months the permit be revoked. ZONING MATTERS. It is learned that the Zoning By-Laws are now re- ceiving the attention of the Attorney General The possibility of revoking the Trani permit, pay- ing suitable damages on account of work already done or contracted for, is discussed with Town Counsel Stone. Meeting adjourned at 945. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. 41 April 11, 1924. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. The regular wwekly meeting of the Planning Board was held in the Selectmen' s Room on Friday evening, April 11th. , at 7/45 o' clock, the full board being present . FOREST STREET EXTENSION . In response to the note) sent the property owners along the line of the proposed Forest St, Extension, there appeared before the Board Mr. L.S.Seaver, Mr, W.E+.Ferguson, Miss Rose A. Tucker, and Miss Mary Powers and her brother, who in answer to the Chairman' s question as to their opin- ion regarding the desirability of the project and their wil- lingness to co-operate, responded as follows: Mr. Seaver. Believes the extension would be a good thing; it would not, however, be of any great benefit to himself.Although house he is now building, and which is now practically sold, fronts on proposed exten- sion its entrance can just as well be from present street. he would be perfectly willing to go into Town Meeting and advocate extension but would not be willing to donate the land, though willing to deed same to town at actual cost to him. Mr. Ferguson. Favors the scheme - will donate land - and will advocate extension in Town Meeting. Miss Tucker. Thinks extension would be a good thing as it would open up back land. Is not prepared to state her views, however, without consultation with her brother. Miss Powers. Thinks extension would be a good thing for the Town and that it would open up back land. She is not enthusiastic, however, over donating her own front AI land which she considers would be a much greater con- tribution than that made by any of the others. It is pointed out that by the extension of the street her back land, now practically worthless, could be divided into ten 75 foot lots; that the loss Ap. 11---2 of from 9500 to 9600 sq. ft. present front land would be compensated for by 48600 sq. ft. for the 10 lots or 38300 for only 9 that would thereby come into the mar- ket; and that assuming her Mass. Ave. land worth 25 cts. a ft. , her back land 1 1/2 cts. now and 12 cts. after extension is put through, by sacrificing 1500 worth of land she stands to make 4500 . AO If abuttors donate their land the Board feels there will be no additional sum asked in way of betterments - save sewer assess- ment - which would not be the case if the Town took the land. Nor is it likely the Town will ever put through the street if owners do not donate the land. All agree to think the matter over and to let the Planning Board know their decision the first of the week. The problem of draining this area is discussed at length. BOSTON POSTAL DISTRICT. Ir. Emery reports he has seen Ir. Baker who will show in a report the advantages to Lexington of coming into the Bos- ton Postal System. The reason that Lynn went out after having been was because of local pride fanned by the politicians. He will assign Inspectors to look into the matter and we may hear from him early in the week. WALTHAM STREET. Mr. L.S.grown reports that Mr. Aldrich is not willing to make a proposition in regard to giving up 0 ft. of his land until he can confer with his Architect . He is willing to co-op- erate but does not feel he should be asked to give his land. The Selectmen find, after conferring with the Town Counsel, that the can do nothing until after taking up the matter with the Town. Their feeling, however, seems to be that land should be taken, if necessary, for widening the street. They prefer that the Planning Board should continue the negotiations. It is the opinion of all present that if the land can be had for 000 or even 51000 it had better be snapped up rather than let the offer go by; and that the Planning Board in doing this could safely look to the Town to make good later. Mr. Brown will push the matter further. 41 BILL BOARDS. The members are each urged to write at once to hon. John A. Gibbs, State house, urging him to vote for house Bill 1548 relative to Bill Boards. Ap,11----3. LAY-OUTS OF FUTURE THROUGH WAYS. Mr. Worthen suggests a very important work the Plan- ning ;hoard might well take up to be the planning of new thorough- fares, properly opening up the town and connecting up present and future developments. .sir. Duffy points out that topographical surveys will be neces- sary that contours may be shown on the Town Map now about comple- ted. It is suggested he block out a letter to be sent the Select- men relative to request for work of this sort to be undertaken. CHARACTER OF YEAR' S WORK. Mr. Worthen points out that owing to the heavy burden the tax payers are to assume this year the plans and recommenda- tions of the Planning Board should not be of a character calling for large or immediate expenditures of money. EXTENSION OF WATER MAINS. Mr. Duffy suggests the great need for a standard meth- od of determining the amount and need of water main extension. He will outline something along those lines for the consid- eration of the Board. Meeting adjourned at 10/20. Next meeting - Friday, April 13, at 7/45. Willard D. grown, Secretary. I/ April 18, 1924. Planning Board Meeting. The regular weekly meeting of the Planning. Board was held on Fri- day evening, April 18th., at 7/45 o'clock; there being present Messrs. Emery, Duffy, Worthen, L.S. and N.D. Brown. 40 Mr. Richards in re. Set-backs. Mr. J.O.Richards appeared before the Board in reference to the matter of setbacks on the lots sold by the Lexington BuildingTrust it having developed that the restriction of 25 feet in their deeds applies to the frontage of main build- ing, while as defined in the Zoning Ordinance the 20 foot set-back required applies to the projecting porches in front. Because of this one owner who had staked out his house 25 feet back and was planning on an 8 foot piazza found himself 3 feet too near the street. Mr. Richards was of the opinion that the lining up of the house fronts made for a better looking street than the ar- rangement called for by the ordinance. Moreover, all his lots having been sold with the set-backs applying to the houses themselves, he was placed in a most unfortunate position. With these views the Board could not agree, but if it would make things easier for Mr. Richards expressed willing- ness to talk the matter over with the purchasers ; advising him on the street in question to reduce his set-back require- ment to 20 feet, and as called for by the zoning requirements - but on the other streets to retain his 25 foot set-back and as defined under Section 18. Proposed Wadman Development. It appearing that the Selectmen had advertised a hearing on the proposed alteration of the old B.F.Brown house, from a two-family to a four-family house, the Board informally dis- cussed the situation from various angles ; and feeling that any development should be related to development* on adjoin- ing estates, called up both Mr. Wadman and Mr. Blake, who appeared before them and explained just what they proposed doing. 40 It was argued by the Board that a more satisfactory re- sult financially both to the owners and to the neighborhood would result if the present house were razed, but to this the owners would not agree. As to lay-out of streets, however, Mr. Wadman expressed April 18 - 2 tivillingness to listen to any recommendation of the Planning Board and to tie his development into that of Mr. Merriam adjoining. If the latter's co-operation can be secured both Mr. Blake and Mr. Wadman will be glad to sit in at a conference if same 10 can be arranged for an early date. The Chairman agreed to see if Mr. Merriam will join in an endeavor to secure a more logical lay-out. Letter of Selectmen. Map and Surveys. A letter to the Board of Selectmen, prepared by Mr. Duffy relative to reproducing Town Map and securing Topographic Data was approved with certain additions. Boston Postal District. The Chairman reports that no word has been received as yet from the Boston Post-Master. Waltham Street. Nothing definite as yet from Mr. Aldrich. Forest Street Extension. Miss Powers reported last Monday that she desired more time to cOnsider the matter- possibly a week. Nothing fUr- ther heard from her. Meeting adjourned at 10/15. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. • April 25, 1924. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. . The regular meeting of the Planning Board was held in the Selectmen's Room on Friday evening, April in, at 7/45 o ' clock; there being present Messrs. Emery, Duffy, Tilton, Worthen, LS. and W.D. Brown. VADAN DEVELOPMENT. In response to letters sent by the Secretary, relative to a harmonious development of the Wadman and adjoining proper- ties, the following gentlemen sat in with the Planning Board. Messrs. Blake, Wadman, Merriam, Custsnce, Earle, Kraetzer, Fish and Wheeler. All evinced interest in the purpose of the conference, expressed e. willingness to co-operate as far as might be, and freely discussed various possibilities . The suggestion of a connection between Meriam and Hancock Streets, with a branch todgewood Road, appeals to all; but it is realized that northing definite can be worked out until topographical data are obtainedby the Town Engineer. Mr. Cus- tance, for the Selectmen, promises these shall be obtained by the Engineering Department and a tentative plan prepared for another meeting to be held next Friday, and the Conference ad, journs at 9/ 0 . LOWER MASS. AVE. SET-BACKS. The Chairman calls attention to the immediate need of se- curing set-back agreements along Lower Mass. Ave. , and among the names suggested as of persons most likely to secure them Mrs. Maynard' s is regarded as the most promising. The Chair- man will see her at once in regard to this. BOSTON POSTAL DISTRICT. Mr. Baker, within a few days, will have his report ready. His Inspectors have already been out here , LETTER TO Macintosh. The Chairman reads copy of letter sent by him to Mr. Neil Intosh urging his co-operation in securing better types of residences. Meeting adjourned at 19/ ;0 . Willard D. Brown, Secretary. May 2, 1924. PNIIVG BOARD MEETING. The regular meeting of the A Room onreg Friday evenih l�.nning Board was held at the Selectmen's Messrs. EmerY, Duffy, Wort enMay , L.S.at 8 1T.D. thereock; being present , andBrown,, and M . French, HANCOCK ST. PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT. Together with Messrs. Calder, Kraatzer, Fish, Make, Wadman and i�lerri�un the r� velvelopment of the properties°a rd examined the suggested de- op e and P perties bounded by Edgewood Road, �eriam Streets as prepared and explained by Mr. French. After certain changes, a lay-out was worked out that met with the approval and satisfactory agreement of all owners. Board and of the property This contemplates a 50 foot extension of to Hancock St. , with a 40 ft. Oakland St, branch through the Merriam andBlake properties to Edgewood Road; the drive encirc- ling the Fish property being abandoned and Goodwin Roa becoming a private entrance drive s. residences, terminating in aturn-around. Caldar and Fish As the Oakland Street continuation would call for quite an amount of land, recently to protect his purchased by Mr. Calder property, it seamed to the Board that if the plan were adopted andt be paid for the amount taken, through, Mr. CG.ld��r should Lot divisions were shown, and on the Blakepro called for a total of eight; - two to the rear of thetY Posed branch street pro- s and six betwee�,n it and Hancock St. , three on each street. If adopted, the "Brown" house mitted to continue as a non-conforming nbuildinot a, wouldutebe practically concealed by the new houses on the Hancock St. lots. Contingent on this lot division, substantially as shown, the Planning Board approved the lay-out was instructed so to inform the Selectmen d the Secretary PARK HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT. As to the development of �� Lexinton, � Park Heights, Section 4, R. . gon, Mass,, Property of Warren S. Griswold. y, C.E. , 25 Eldon St. , Dorchester, Mass." the Secretary is instruct --d to request Mr. Griswold and Mr. Bellamy to appear befar.e the Board at its next meeting. May 2---2. This proposed lay-out is not in line with the conclu- sions reached by Mr. Duffy when Town Engineer, and made known to the present developer. FOREST STREET EXTENSION. The Chairman states Miss Powers is still considering the 40 matter, and has inquired as to the amount of back land she will be required to give up. LOWER MASS, AVE. RESTRICTIONS. Mrs. Maynard is willing to attempt the securing of set- back agreements but suggests Mr. Guthrie, the new President of the Civic Association, as one more likely to meet with success, BOSTON POSTAL DISTRICT. A lettr is read from Mr. Baker who, upon the report of his Inspectors, thinks it possible and advantageous to ,ex- in;ton to include the town within the limits of the Boston Postal District . HARING ADVERT I SED. In connection with the hearing advertised in the Times, relative to granting permission to build a two-family house in a zone where this class of dwellings is not all- lowed, the Secretary is instructed to communicate with the Selectmen, pointing out that in no case, under the Zoning By-Laws, can an exception of this sort be granted. ZONING BY-LAWS. The Zoning By-Laws, having received the approval of the Attorney General, and having this day been published for the third time, are now in force . Meeting adjourned at 10 P.M. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. May 9, 1924. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. The regular meeting of the Planning Board was held in the Selectmen s Room on Friday evening, May 9, at 7/45 o'clock; there being present Messrs. Emery, Worthen, Duffy, L.S. and W.D. Brown. FOREST STREET 4 - EXTENSION. Mr. Leroy Brown reports he has just seen Miss Powers who consents to give her land, provided no betterments are assessed and that the Planning Board will arrange with the Tuckers relative to the necessary adjustment of lots. The question is raised as to whether, even though the land is all given, and although the Board has as- sured the owners that if this were done no betterments would in all probability be assessed, the Town can be -4 , properly asked to assume the entire cost of building the road. After quite some discussion it is felt that the Board can properly report to the Selectmen the attitude of the owners and leave to them the matter of recommend- ations. PARK LAND DEVELOPMENT. Mr. Griswold, Owner, with Mr. Bellamy, his Engineer, appeared before the Board with street lay-out of Section #4, which is a departure from that worked out last year by Mr. fluffy, and which does not meet with the Board's approval. The Chairman states, however, the Board' s desire to co-operate with the Owner as far as possible and be- speaks the Owner's co-operation as well. This, Mr. Gris- wold agrees to, and Mr. Bellamy, Mr. huffy and Town Eng- ineer French work over the plans, obtatning a result which, while apparently satisfactory, involves the con- sent of adjoining owners. A conference of all interested is sugmsted for next week and Mr. Griswold agrees to obtain th* addresses of all these parties and give them to the SeOretary that proper notices may be sent out. LUND.tRGAN'S APPLICATION FOR TWO-FAMILY HOUSE ON SYLVIA STREET. From information received from Mr. Lundergn, it ap- pears that the location he has in mind for the \ proposed two-family house is 200 ft. back from Mass. � a lot 62' x 80' - just under the required 5000e1`eet.� on May 9 ---2. Although the majorirjr of the houses on the short stretch of Sylvia Street tieing in Lexington are now two-family houses, and no great harm would be done by the erection of another; and despite the opinion of some of the members that Sec. 18 of the By-Laws might be interpreted to permit of an exception being made in this case; -nit is the feeling of all that we should be • most careful at the outset that no precedents be estab- lished tending to weaken our Zoning Ordinances. Mr. Worthen suggests that in this particular case the Selectmen might very properly ask Mr. Lundergan to bring in a petition, signed by the necessary percentage of owners, asking that the street be transferred to the R2 zone. This done, it could be brought up in Town Meeting, be approved by the Planning Board, and properly put through in accordance with the Zoning By-Laws. It is left that the Chairman see Town Counsel Stone, and after conferring with him, put the matter up to the Selectmen. HIGHWAY LINES. Mr. Duffy brings up the great importance of establish- ing Highway lines and reads copy of letter sent by him in A921, to the Board of Selectmen, asking that petitions be sent the County Commissioners. The Secretary is instructed to communicate with the Se- lectmen, asking that the matter be reviewed and that def- inite action be taken. BLAKE DT ELOPMENT.. Mr. Blake, while approving the proposed new street through the old "Brown ' property, does not feel he can fo follow out the proposed lot divisions ; and having with- drawn his petition for a four-family house, submits a lay- out which will eventually provide 6 lots between the new street and Hancock Street as suggested, but which, instead of two lots in the rear, calls for a short court by which four may be obtained. This meets with the approval of all and as soon as Mr. Wadman can provide a proper and accurate blueprint, the Sec- retary is instructed to write the Selectmen a supplementary letter, stating that the proposed lay-out has the Planning Board' s approval and Recommending it be adopted. IP WALTHAM STREET. No further word has been received from Mr. Aldrich. Meeting adjourned at 11/30. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. May 16, 1924. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. The regular meeting of the Plannin Board was held in Cary Hall on Friday evening, May 16, at 7/45 o'clock; there being present Messrs. Emery, Duffy, L.S. and W.D. Brown and Town Engineer French. WINTER STREET & GRISWOLD DEVELOPMENT. In response to the efforts of Mr. Griswold there appearedbefore the Board the following land-owners along that portion of Winter Street affected by the proposed Park Land Development;- Messrs. Mahoney, Haynes, Welch, Streckroski, to- gether with Mr. Griswold and his Engineer, Mr. Bella- my. The Chairman explains that the conference is in the nature of a get-to-gather meeting to see if with the co-operation of the property owners, a development of 'Minter Street may not be arrived at which, by the avoidance of excessive grades, will meet with the ap- proval of the towns-people and be to the mutual advantage of all. Mr. Haynes and Mr. Welch suggest a slight change in the course of the street whereby their properties will be left practically uninjured. Mr. Steckroski objects to the loss of certain of his front land, reclaimed by his own personal efforts; but it is pointed out that any considerable shift in his favor will work to the corresponding injury of Mr. Lex- nor across the street. He also objects to the proposed future streets across his property, preferring, instead, an extension of a street laid down by the R.R park developers and which running adjacent to his property would continue along a narrow piece of land now owned by him. It was pointed out that the streets as proposed would be to his ulti- mate advantage if he ever decided to put his property in the market; but until such time arrived he would not be affected thereby. Mr. Mahoney objects to the lay-out inasmuch as it takes a 50 foot strip completely across one end of his property leaving a plot of a little over one acre segre- gated, when the street is actually built, from the bal- 1, ance of his property, which comprises altogether, at the present time, from 10 to 11 acres. He has no desire to develope his land for residences having bought it for a farm, for which he needs his pres- ent acreage and claiming it impossible to purchase more adjoining. He does not care to commit himself, however, at this time. May 16---2. As the result of a long and most harmonious discus- sion it is decided to have Mr. French meet the owners on the ground on Sunday next, that they may all gain a better idea of the changes in Winter Street the Board is suggesting. • LUNDERGAN HEARING. At the Board of Survey's Hearing on Tuesday last, it appears that Mr. Lundergan's application for permission to build a two family house on Sylvia Street was denied. It also appears, from his conversation with Mr. Emery, that he now contemplates the erection of two single fam- ily houses, providing the 20 ft. set-back line is modi- fied to agree with the set-backs of the remaining houses on the street. BOSTON POSTAL DISTRICT. The Chairman reports a long conversation with the Inspector detailed to look into ' the matter, relative to Lexingtonfs coming into the Boston Postal District, whereby it would appear greatly to our advantage so to do. He presents petetions he has drawn up for this purpose. Meeting adjourned at 1130. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. May. 23, 1924. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. The regular meeting of the Planning Board was held in the Selectmengs Room on Friday evening, May 23, at 7/45 o'clock; there being present Messrs. Emery, j!orthen, Duffy, L.S. and J.D. Brown, and Town Engineer French. GRISWOLD DEVELOPMENT. Mr. Emery and Mr. French report that as a result of their going over the situation on the ground with the residents along Winter Street all seemed reconciled to Board' s plan in the main, objections being brought for- ward only as to certain details. Messrs Griswold, Bellamy and Steckroski appearing before the Board, the two former plead to be allowed the retention of the development plan presented by them, endeavoring to show that the steep section of the present Winter Street can be modified by cutting and filling so as to secure a 10 ;'o grade. When questioned as to the selling price of their lots, which range from 4 et. to 4 cts . a foot, they acknowledge there is not enough profit to be had to permit them to rough-grade the street its entire 50 foot width. The most they will do is to build a road- way wide enough to get by on; which will mean that the excessive cost of building the street as laid out by them will later have to be assumed by the town. The Board points out that by selling their lots so that reservations are held out permitting the future laying out of the street as proposed, they can, until such time arrives, continue to use the present steep way without regrading. This idea seems to strike a responsive chord, as does the expressed sentiment of the Board that the new side street shown need be but 40 feet in width. Mr. Steckroski asks for a modification of the lines of the street along a portion of his lot, and the Board assures him that while not able to conform to his wishes entirely it feels it can meet them to a certain extent. It also plans to change the curve somewhat at the top of the hill that Mr. Haines' property may not be injured unduly. And the Board agrees to see if arrangements cannot • be made with Mr. Ryan enabling the lower portion of Winter Street to swing across his land, instead of over the present ledges. In consideration of the above facts, after the peti- tioners have left, the Board decides to adhere to the plan substantially as laid out by Hr. Duffy and Mr. French and unanimously passes the following votes- May 23---2. Voted to recommend to the Board of Survey that the layout submitted under date of by Griswold for development of land border ng upon Winter Street be not approved; that as a sub- stitute the lay-out exhibited upon the tracing plan furnished by the Town Engineer under date of be recommended to the Board of Survey for approval, 41 but upon condition that the lay-out between Hillcrest and James Streets be altered to conform to said tra- ing plan and that said Griswold file such corrected plan -- with the Board of Survey as his development plan for said area and agree to obtain necessary releases and changes in title to property .to conform thereto - this latter section of land being still before the Board of Survey awaiting approval. It was also moved and voted that a copy of above vote be sent the Board of Survey togather with an ex- planatory letter and a tracing plan of the approved lay-out modified in accordance with the latest sug- geations. BOSTON POSTAL DISTRICT. It is decided best, in view 4of the coming elections, to take no active steps, for thea present, in the mat- ter of petitioning for admission into the Boston Pos- tal District. Meeting ;adjourned at 9/45. vii:tla;rd D. Brown, Secretary. 1 Sept. 15, 1924 . PLANNING BOARD) MEETING. The first Fall meeting of the Planning Board was held on Monday evening, Sept. 15th. , at 8 o'clock, there being present Messrs . Emery, Tilton, Duffy, and W. D. Brown, as well as Chairman Burn- ham of the Board of Selectmen and Town Engineer French. PARKER S TREET EXTENSION. Mr. Burnham ststes thst the necessary hearings have been held and that a Town fleeting is to be called on Oct. 6, when the project will be urged. Mr. Emery declares it the feeling of the Planning Board that this and all new street takings be put through under the Betterment Act; the few legal cases that might arise serving to establish a sound basis on which damages and bet- terments may be awarded. LIBERTY HEIGHTS . Mr. Burnham states the dwellers onCaswell Ave . , Wilson Ave . , Arcadia Ave . , and Cliff Ave. desire the Town tontake over these streets and put them in proper shape, for which they will be willing to contribute one half the expense which has been estimated as follows :- Caswell Ave. $ ,3049.00 Wilson Ave . 5000.00 Arcadia Ave . 2600.00 Cliff Ave. 4445.00 15045.00 GARAGE HEARING. There will be a hearing on Tuesday, Sept. 22. rela- tive to permission to erect a garage in the hill opposite Child' s Service Station, East Lexington, the front to be three feet back from the side walk line - the owner claim- ing this to be the only way of locating garage, without which he will be unable to sell his property. The Liberty Heights petitioners will be heard this same evening. STREET MAPS . Mr. French states the maps for streets for which building line agreements have been signed will be completed so that hearings may be held the latter part of October. mO"'N MAP. The completion of the large Town Map hinges on ob- taining a draughtsman, but Mr. French assures the Board it will be finished this year. 40 MISCELLANEOUS . Various matters are discussed informally, including 111 the problem of Building Inspector, the Waltham Street situa- tion, the electrification of the steam railroad and the mat- Sept. 15 - 2. ter of entering the Boston Postal System. In regard to the last named question it is suggested that the co-oper- ation of the Board of Trade be secured ; and that now the primaries are over, the scheme be more actively pushed. GRISWOLD DEVELOPMENT. Mr. French reports that Mr. Griswold has never filed 40 any plans and that he is going ahead on his original lay-out, regardless of the recommendations of the Planning Board and the Board of Survey. Mr. Emery suggests the erection of large signs on adjoining property. Mr. Burnham promises to bring this up for consideration by the Selectmen. STEVEN TRIBINO. A plan prepared by F. P. Cutter for the development of the property of Steven Tribino, off Utica St. , is exam- ined. It is returned with the request that revised plans be submitted that will better tie in with the future devel- opment of the adjoining parcels . Mr. French agrees to attend to this . PUBLICIY. The question of making the public better acquainted with the work of the Planning Board is discussed. Meeting adjourned at 10/30. Next meeting, Monday, Sept. 22. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. 41 Oct. 4, 1924 . PLANNING BOARD MEETING. The second meeting of the Planning Board was held on the evening of Oct. 4th. , the furl board being present, together with Mr. Guthrie and Messrs . McIntosh and Gannett. LOWER MASS . AVE. SET-BACKS . IP Mr. Guthrie reports difficulties in obtaining signa- tures to the petition for a 15' set-back from Oak St. to the Arl- ington line, the objections cheifly being:- 1 . As the Avenue may never be widened, why is the Planning Board in such a hurry now? 2. If they sign up for a 15' set-back now, might they not be asked, after the street line is established, to set their dwellings back 20 feet more? Mr. Emery will write a letter to Mr. Guthrie covering these points, and the Board expresses a willingness to meet with the residents of this section and discuss the problem with them. MR. MC INTOSH. Mr. McIntosh and his Engineer, Mr. Gannett, submit a tentative lay-out of the Cary Farm property recently purchased by the former, showing same sub divided into 300 house lots . He will submit a 200 scale plan showingthe surrounding properties - also a copy of the lay-out for the Planning Board to consider in conjunction with a visit to the premises . BOSTON POSTAL DISTRICT. It appearing that the Lexington Board of Trade is anx- ious and willing to take over the task of securing admission to the Boston Postal District, it is moved and so voted, - that the petitions already prepared by the Planning Board, with signatures to same, be turned over to them. WALTHAM ST. RESTRICTIONS . Mr. Leroy Brown returns petitions signed by over 75 per cent of the residents of Waltham Street asking for the estab- lishment of building lines on said street. EVENING FOR MEETINGS. It is agreed that for the present every other Tuesday evening be set aside for the meeting of the Planning Board, the next meeting to be held on Nov. 14th. Meeting adjourned. Willard D. Brown, 40 Secretary. Oct. 14, 1924 . PLANNING BOARD MEETING. A meeting of the Planning Board was held on Tuesday evening, Oct. 14th. , at 8 o'clock, there being present Messrd. Emery, Tilton, Duffy, Worthen, LS . and W.D. Brown and Town Engineer French. CO OPERATION WITH MR. MC INTOSH. Mr. Emery reports taking up and discussing at length with Mr. McIntosh the project of an architectural board who should act as a Board of Censors and who should aid purchasers and home builders with suggestions and advice, to the end that a more attractive class of dwellings may be erected and one worthier the community and the Town as a whole. A young draughtsman would probably be required who would prepare sketches, plans and suggested changes under the direction of the Board. Mr. McIntosh thinks the idea full of possibilities . It is the first instance, he says, in his wxperience of a Town' s offering to co operate with him. He thinks he would be willing to bear a good part if not the whole of the expense . It is the feeling of the Planning Board, in discussing the project, that if it is put into effect, the submission of plans for the approval of the Architectural Board should be made part of the restrictions. As a start, portfolios might be prepared - showing types of houses , of varying costs, that would meet with the approval of the Board - together with photographs of houses actually built that might be seen - 'as well as, perhaps, estimates from local builders . It is suggested that the Secretary sae Mr. Greely and ascertain if he would be willing to serve as one of such a Board. SET BACKS . Mr. French reports the completion of plans showing agreements for set-backs on Bedford, Parker, Clarke, Muzzey, Mass . Ave. f from Clarke to Cedar Sts . ) and Waltham Sts . Mr. Emery reports having written Mr. Guthrie in re . lower Mass . Ave . set-backs . He expects to hear from him soon. The Secretary is instructed to call to the attention of the Board of Selectmen the petitions asking that building lines be established with the request that the necessary steps be taken to secure the benefit of the signatures . CLERK OF THE WORKS. It is informally suggested to the School Building Com- mittee that a Clerk of the Works be employed for both school S buildings . Oct. 14 - 2. MEMORIAL ROAD. Mr. Duffy reports that the State Dept. of Public Works is looking into the project of making a memorial road of the route of Paul Revere . 41 BETTERMENTS. The Board discusses at length the policies in con- nection with laying out, accepting and building new streets and a letter to the Selectmen is suggested relative to their bet- terment policy. No action on this matter is taken, however. Meeting adjourned at 10/05 until Oct. 28. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. )'y OCt . 28, 1924. Owing to a meeting of the 1925 Town Committee on this 41 evening, the meeting of the Planning 3oard is post- poned until Tuesday evening, Nov . 4th. Willard D. Brown, Secretary, i`U NOV . 4, 1924. PLAth UNu BOAiRD Miz LTING . The postponed meeting of the Planning Board was held in the Selectmen' s Room on Tuesday evening, Nov. 4th. , at 8 o' clock, all members being present. • STR iT BUILDING POLICY. it being the opinion of the Board that the present policy of the Selectmen in grading newly accepted streets for only a portion of their width and assessing betterments on this basis will inevetably put the Town to great expense when, at some later date, these streets are finished their entire width; - as a basis of a communication to the Select- men calling attention to the gravity of this course of pro- ceedure, some time was spent listing the various kinds of trouble to which the Town might be liable:- with the follow- ing result. if the Town in accepting a street does not build it the full width, assessing costs under the betterment act, comple- tion later, with no expense assumed by the abuttors, may in the following instances be done only at an excessive cost, to be borne by the tax payers at large . a, zxcessively steep embankments ( fills ) requiring retaining walls and guard rails. b. Deep cuts, involving retaining walls or steep slopes; and if ledge is encountered, additional excessive costs. c. The problem of lateral drainage is greatly increased where fills and cuts have to be constructed after- wards. d. Present, also, is the question of possible land damages to be met if street is not built its full width at the outset. e . The central portions of a street, as usually laid out , takes the easiest course . The most expensive portions to build are the sides necessary to bring I/ the travelled way to its accepted width. f. ridden rocks, cuts, gullies, etc. in unfinished portions on either side may result in heavy damages for the Town to assume. Nov . 4.- 2. g. Then, too, easements may have to be paid for get- ting rid of drainage . h. The cost of circular curbings, required at street intersections, when streets are finally built full width, will have to be assumed at that time . i . It is much more economical to build the entire road at the beginning. j . and lastly- every Exception made to the policy of building streets their full width, paves the way for further exceptions - with increasing liabili- ties and dangers . BMILDING LINES. Mr. Moulton briefly confers with the board relative to the set-back releases, etc. and promises to have these p: tit1- tions taken up promptly at the next meeting .of the Selectmen. The Secretary receives from Mr. emery the petitions rela- tive to Waltham, Muzzey, Clarke and Bedford Streets, and is in- stuuctad to deliver them to the Selectmen, with the request for immediate action as promised by Mr. Moulton. ISAAC CARY MEMORIAL BUILDING. From information received, it becomes apparent that the Conference Committee, solely from the motive of immediate saving in cost to the Town, is inclining towards the Town hall Site . After a full discussion of the matter it is agreed that the Chairman draft, for the approval of the Board, a letter to be sent the Conference Committee discussing the undesirability of this site from a Zoning standpoint - and indicating the Board' s preference to the Cary Library site. Meeting adjourned at 9/50 to Tuesday Nov. 11th. Willard D . Brown, Secretary, Nov. 11, 1924. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. A meeting of. the Planning Board was heldin the Assessor' s Room on Tuesday evening, Nov. 11, at 8 o'clock, there being pre- sent Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Tilton, L.S. and W.D. Brom and Mr. French. LETTER TO CONFERENCE COMMITTEE 41 IN RE. TOWN HALL SITE. The Chairman reads a letter from Mr. Geo. H. Gibson, Clerk, in which he states .- "At a meeting of the "Committee of Eleven to confer with the Trustees of the Cary Fund" held. Nov. 5th. , it was voted:- " that the Clerk make inquiry whether the Planning Board has any plan in mind for development of the district in the centre of the Town, bounded by the railroad, Meriam St. , Clarke St. , Forest St. , Waltham St. , Vine Brook Road, Win- throp Road, Woburn St. , to the railroad. If the Planning Board has any plan affecting any patt of the described district, please communicate with that Com- mittee in writing as early as convenient. " NRr. Emery reads a letter he has prepared in answer to above . This is discussed and approved with certain omissions and amendments . LETTER RELATIVE TO STREET ACCEPTANCE ANI) CONSTRUCTION. The Chairman reads a draft of a letter to the Selectmen relative to the course of proceedure in connection with the acceptance and construction of new streets and the levying of betterments . After lengthy discussion, it is thought best to look more closely into the legal aspects and re-draft the letter for further consideration. MASS. AVE. SET-BACKS. The Board considers at quite some length the set-backs allotted to upper Massachusetts Avenue . Adjourned at 9/45/ Willard D. Brown, Secretary. 10 1G, Nov. 18, 1924. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. A meeting of the Planning Board was held in the Selectmen' s Room of the Town Hall on Tuesday evening, Nov. 18, at 8 o'clock, all the members being present, together with Mr. McIntosh and his Engineer Mr. Frost. FAIR OAKS TERRACE. 11 Mr. McIntosh submits " Plan and Profile of Fair Oaks Ter- race - Nov. 192 A - C . H. Gannett, C .E. " and asks for Planning Board's approval of road terminating in circular turn-around, 100' in diam. , opening up 13 lots in back of old Lawrence house . This is finally approved, provided circle is moved back 100 feet from the location shown to avoid locating same on an exces- sively steep grade. CARY FARM PROPERTY. Mr. McIntosh submits large and small scale prints of pro- posed road development on the Cary Farm property. After. ^.an informal discussion of the matter, the Board a- grees to meet Mr. McIntosh at 2/30 next Sunday afternoon and go over the premises with him and his Engineer. LETTER IN RE. TOWN HALL SITE FOR ISAAC CARY PEM. BUILDING. The Chairman reads a copy of his revised letter sent to the Conference Committee on Nov. 14, and conveying the views of the Planning Board relative to the suitability of the Town Haal site for the Isaac Cary Memorial Building. Letter approved. APPROVAL OF HOUSE PLANS. The Board takes up with Mr. McIntosh the possibility of his inserting in his deeds to the Fair Oaks property a restrictive clause reauiring all buildings hereafter erected to meet with the approval of the Planning Board, or a Committee of Architects appointed by them, This, on advice of his counsel, Mr. McIntosh feels he can not do; but he is willing to have such a requirement put into a supplementary agreement, and do his best to have it sub- scribed to by all purchasers . SET BACK MAP. Mr. Brown suggests the usefulness of a map showing the pro- posed set-back lines on the Keeley, Edison and Town Hall sites ; and it is left to the Secretary to ask Mr. French to prepare such a map. BILL BOARDS. 41 Tha Chairman asks Mr. Duffy to carefully read through the last Bulletin issued by the Federation relative to Bill Boards and report as to any action it might be advisable to take . Nov. 18 -- 2. MEMBERSHIP FEE FOR FEDERATION OF PLANNING BOARDS. The Secretary reports a bill received from Mr. Jos Finberg 24 John Street, Attleboro, for dues to the Federation of 40 Planning Boards . Mr. Leroy Brown generously donates the necessary lo.00 and the Secretary is instructed to pay our membership fee . Meeting adjourned at 10/15 until Nov. 25. '`rillard D. Brown, Secretary. Nov . 25, 1924. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. A meeting of the Planning Board was held in the Assessor' s Department of the Town Hall on Tuesday evening, Nov. 25th. , at 8 o'clock, there being present Messrs . Emery, duffy, L.S. and Vt.D. Brown and Yr. French. MC INTOSH DEVTELOPM NT. After discussing the Fairhan_k's lay-out in the light of • its recent inspection of the property, the Board finds itself agreed that while the streets as laid out are of easy grade, they ignore to a greater or less extent the topography of the region. Furthermore, owing to the great depth of the lots, it seems more than probable that in the course of time many in- dividual developments would be attempted , so that consideration should be given at this time to the trend of future develop- ment with the possibility of streets of easy grade and drainage . Mr. McIntosh is then called into the meeting, inasmuch as he is to appear before the Board of Survey for approval of the lay-out, and is told the feeling of the Planning Board and of their unwillingness to approve the plan as presented and with- out a topographical map. He suggests limiting the lots to one house each, but de- clares he cannot reserve land for future streets, particularly as this would mean a great loss to him financially, and he is doing now more than any other developer would do; neither will he have a topographical survey made, as he regards this as en- tirely unneccessary. He then refers the matter to the Board of Survey, who request the opinion of the Planning Board. This is voiced by the Chairman who states that while the streets as laid out are of good grades, there has been no provision made for future development, which is bound to come with lots of the depth indicated; and with the future interest of the Town in mind, the Planning Board cannot approve the lay-out as submitted without further study, which to be intelligent should be based on a topographical survey. If Mr. McIntosh is unwilling to provide this, Mr. Emery urges it be made at once by the Town Engineer. Meeting Adjourned. Willard D. Brown, Secretary. Dec . 2, 1924. The regular meeting of the Board postponed to Dec. 9. D . 9, 1924. PLANNING BOARD MEE T ING. The postponed meeting of the Planning Board was held in the Assessor's Department at the Town Hall on Tuesday evening, Dec . 9, at 8 o'clock, there being present Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Worthen, L.S. and V .D. Brown and Town Engineer French. VINE BROOK DEVELOPMENT. 41 The Chairman reports that Mr. Leslie Ryder wishes a confer- ence with the Board relative to reaching some decision regarding the proposed roadway along Vine Brook which was taken up with him last year. As Mr. McIntosh' s development will probably occupy the im- mediate attention of the Board, Hr. Ryder has been asked to post- pone his conference for a couple of weeks . Mr. Emery exhibits a water color sketch he has had made showing a suggested treatment of Vine Brook and the adjacent roadway in the Playground and calling for a planting of willows . This meets the approval of the Board and Mr. Emery later submits same to the Board of Selectmen. BUILDING LINES . Hr. Scammon leaves with the Board notices for hearings rel- ative to building line set-backs along Bedford, Clarke, Waltham, and Muzzey Streets and Massachusetts Avenue . BILLBOARDS. Mr. Duffy reports the results of his conversations with Mr. Hartman relative to proposed legislation action relative to billboards . There is some doubt whether the Zoning Ordinances will take care of the bill hoard feature inasmuch as it has no reference to the use of land . Proposed legislation in this connection will occupy a year's time at least. Meanwhile, Mr. Duffy will have recommendations worked out for consideration at the next meeting of the Board. MC INTOSH DEVELOPMENT. Mr. French having completed his topographical survey, the Selectmen refer the Fairbank' s Development lay-out back to the Planning Board, before whom appear Mr. McIntosh together with Mr. Gannett, his Engineer, and Mr. Frost. After a long discussion, during which Mr. McIntosh declares himself willing to restrict his lots to a single dwelling, but as unwilling tp lay out any system of secondary streets to be constructed at some later time, it is voted.- That the Planning Board does not feel justified in rec- , ommending for approval, at least without further study, any scheme that disregards secondary streets . It will have Mr. French make a study of the Fairbank's property with this in mind, using the topographical map just made, and suggests Mr. McIntosh and his Engineer make similar studies . And will meet one week from tonight to consider the matter. It is suggested lots 350 ft. in depth might prove ac- ceptable. Meeting adjourned at 11/15. Willard D. Brown, Secy. Dec . 16, 192.4-. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. The regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on Tuesday evening, Dec . 16th. , at 8 o'clock in the Selectmen's Room, there being present Messrs. Emery, Duffy, Tilton, L.S. and W.D. Brown and Mr. French. RYDER DEVELOPMENT ALONG VINE BROOK. Mr. Leslie Ryder appears before the Board and asks that some definite action be taken in regard to street lay-out a- long Vine Brook from Mass. Ave. in, and the roadway connecting with Waltham Street which the Town ballasted with stone with- out having taken the property over. He is most anxious that these matters be settled speedily as in their present standing he is put to a hardship in dispos- ing of his holdings . The Board goes over the surveys and plans with him and a- grees to give early attention to the matter. MR. MC INTOSH-FAIRBANKS DEVELOPMENT. Mr. French presents for the considerstion of the Board a lay-out of the Fairbank's property as prepared by himself and Mr. Duffy, and which seems to all the members a most log- ical and well considered arrangement. Mr. McIntosh, however, appears before the Board and now formally withdraws his petition for the approval of the devel- opment of the property as previously submitted. He states that on further consideration he has decided it best to undertake a "farm" development and asks now for the ap- , proval of the present roadway to the Mansion House, increased to 50 feet in width and extended, practically as shown on for- mer lay-outs, to Shade Street. He also agrees to give the land abutting on Shade Street to enable the Ton to widen same . As nearly as the Board can make out, the new scheme con- templates small lots on all the surrounding streets, including the new street for which approval is asked, leaving large tracts in the centre, or farms, to which access may be had only through some of the street lots . No provision of any kind is contem- plated looking towards the future development of these areas . While the Board has no objection to the proposed street, it is the feeling of all that this future development should not be left to chance, but should be provided for at this time. ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTING BOARD. The Chairman and Mr. McIntosh having had various confer- ' ences relative to the suggested scheme of having all future purchasers of the lottery's property consult with a Board of Architects, acting for the Planning Board, and to consist at Dec . 16 --2. the outset of Messrs . Brown and Greeley, Mr . McIntosh reads to the Board a copy of a tentative supplementary agreement he will try to persuade all purchasers to sign. This meets with the approval of all, and if carried throuh in the proper way should prove teftttMr T great tebneitoMr. MiwIntosh, 11 to the lot owners and prospective n. Meeting adjourned at 11/30. 'rillard D. Brown, Secretary. 11 I67 PLANNING BOARD RIPORT FOR 1924 The elanning Board submitted no report one year ago . It vas too much occupied in the work of drafting a Zoning By-Law for Lexington and no definite results could be reported. A Zoning Law was finally reported to and approved by the Town at the session of the annual meeting held on search 17, 1924, was later approved, without change , by the Attorney General of the Commonwealth, and thereupon became a By-Law of the Town. The entire subject was so thoroughly explained and so generally considered by the voters , at the time of the adoption of the By- Law, that further comment by this Board or at this time in un- necessary. It is the opinion of the Planning Board, and we believe of all thoughtful citizens, that no act of the Town has done more than this to protect the future of the Town and to promote a livelier sense of civic duty and confidence . The By-Law, as passed, will doubtles be found lacking in complete provisions to meet all conditions as time goes on and unforeseen developments appear. It can be amended where necessary when the need develops . The zoning problems out of the way, the Planning 13oard addressed itself to numerous other matters, some of its own initiation and others referred to it by the Selectmen. It must be borne in mind that the Planning Board is with- out authority or power to do or to order any work or reform. It may only recommend; other officials or agencies of the Town must be relied upon to make these recommendations effective . Next to the zoning of the Town, the Planning Board has thought the establishment of building lines to be most important . A general provision to this end was incorporated in the Zoning By-Law which provided that no building in any residential district, should be placed nearer than twenty feet to the exterior line of the street . Such provision is generally effective but needs reinforcement and slight modification for application to certain streets and sections of streets to produce the best results. The Planning Board, has , for many months, been actively at work upon this subject and it is hoped that in the near future , definite petitions with necessary releases may be pre- sented with respect to certain streets for action and acceptance by the Town. Other streets will then be taken up in like manner. -2- Proposed layouts for development of various tracts of land in Town have been referred to the Planning Board by the Selectmen for such recommendations as the Planning Board could make . In every such instance , the Board has given careful con- sideration to the plan, has heard the petitioners, and has visited the property. With a single exception, the Selectmen, sitting as the Board of cYurvey, have , we believe, adopted the recommendations of the Planning Board. Among the properties so visited have been the Bacon property at Massachusetts Avenue and Maple Street, East Lexington; the Griswold property at North Lex- ington; the Tribino property on Utica Street ; the Blake-Wadman property on Hancock Street; the Gary Farm property on the State Road and the property of the Lexington Building Trust on Bedford Street . To supplement the Zoning Law,the Planning Board is de- veloping a scheme for an advisory board of architects to advise with those who purchase land and intend to build in Lexington. This board will consist of i+.essrs. Millard D . Brown and illiam Roger Greeley. The cordial cooperation of our large developer, Mr. Neil I+:clntosh,has been had in this undertaking and it is hoped that real and substantial results will be had in the shape of houses that are more attractive in themselves and more harmonious as a group. It is too early, as yet ,to report definite results. The Planning Boardhas given much time to many other matters such, for example , as the widening of the Massachusetts Avenue end of Waltham Street; the extension of Forest Street to Massachusetts Avenue to furnish a relief to Massachusetts Avenue as well as to develop a considerable tract for residential building; initiating the movement for adding Lexington to the Boston Postal District, obtaining investigation by the Post Office officials and approval by the Postmaster at Boston; bill board regulation and completion of the large scale map of the entire Town. Such a map is indispensible for proper consideration of highway extensions and for the laying out of new highways. It will be necessary, however, for the Town Engineer to add fairly complete topographical detail to the map to make it possible to lay out highways with proper grades and for proper drainage . In the opinion of the Planning Board one of the most ur- gent and important problems confronting the Town at the present time is the laying out of through highways to accommodate the ever increasing motor traffic . This may be done by connecting existing highways or by extending the same and may, in some instances, involve the building, at least the laying down, of entirely new ways ; but -3- it must be done and promptly and, by so doing, a substantial control will be obtained over future land development in the Town. Eespectfully submitted, LEXINGTON PLANNING BOARD FREDERICK L. EMERY, Chairman J. 0. TILTON, M .D. LEROY S. BROWN EDWIN B. WORTHEN WILLARD D. BROWN J. HENRY DUFFY Lexington, 1v!ass . Februarylst, 1925 1925 PLANNING BOARD Frederick L. Emery J. Henry Duffy Edwin B. Worthen J. Odin Tilton C. Edward Glynn William D. Milne Jan. 13, 1925. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. III A meeting of the Planning Board was called for Tuesday evening, Jan. 13th. , but only Messrs . Emery and Duffy were able to attend. A hearing of the Selectmen to Mr. Mclntoshes request for appro- val of a single wide street through the Cary property 9 on the lines of the present entrance drive ) was being held, at which Messrs . Emery 0 and Duffy were requested to sit in. 1!Thile no objection was to be had to this street in itself, Mr. Emery stated it was the feeling of the Planning Board that this should not be accepted without provision being made for the future develop- ment of the entire property. Jan. 20, 1925. The meeting of the Planning Board regularly falling on this night was postponed to Jan. 31st. III • Jan. 31, 1925. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. A meeting of the Planning Board was held in the Selectmen' s Room on Saturday evening, Jan. 31st. , at 8 o 'clock, there being present Messrs . Emery, Duffy and W. D. Brown. BILL BOARDS. Mr. Duffy reports conversation with Mr. Hartman who promised to forward copies of Bill Board Regulations of Newton and other places . In view of the fact that Mr. Hartman thinks we are amply protected under our Zoning Laws, Mr. Duffy suggests and those present concur, that we let the matter stand as at present, while awaiting proposed legislative action in regard to this problem. It is agreed also that the Board make a survey of existing bill boards, noting those that do not comply with the State regulations, that through the Selectmen the State Department of Public Works may be asked to see that same are removed. 1925 APPROPRIATION. A letter having been received from Mr. Pierce ask- estimate of the Planning Board's probable expenditures for the year to come, it is agreed that from $150 to $ 100 should be ample. PRINTING ZONING REGULATIONS, ETC. 111 It is agreed it would be a wise policy for the Town to have printed in a single volume the Town By-Laws, the amended Building Laws, the Plumbing Regulations, the Zoning Ordinances and whatever other regulations of this character might properly be included. Mr . Greeley is conferred with and agrees to see that a suitable article is inserted in the warrant for the March Town Meeting. Mr. Duffy agrees to take the matter up with him more at length. Dr. Kane, who happens in, reports requests for copies of our Zoning Ordinances from states even as far removed as Florida. FOREST STREET EXTENS ION. The chairman agrees to see the Selectmen relative to the possible acceptance of the proposed Forest Street exten- sion, which for lack of funds was not taken up at the last Town Meeting. This should be finished, if possible, by June next. THROUGIH HIGIfi'rAYS. 4/ After a survey of the large scale map of the Town, it is decided to ask the Town Engineer for a copy for the Planning Board which may be studied and marked in connec- tion with a system of through highways . Meeting adiourned at 10 o'clock, subject to call . 'Millard D. Brown, Secretary. PLANNING BOARD MEETING 1. March 14, 1925. The first meeting of the new Board was held March 14, 1925, at the Town Hall, at 8 o' clock- P.M. Chairman Emery, and Messers Duffy, Tilton, Glynn, and Milne were present, also Town Engineer French. Mr. Emery outlined the functions of the Board. Lexington Building Trust. i Messrs . J. O. Richards, and Kellway for the above presented sketches showing proposed extension of Hancock St. and outlined difficulty with George A. Warner and Ellie War \. in an attempt to secure from them certain parcels of land \ needed for the favorable location of the proposed street. They were heard, and the chairman directed the secretary to invite George (and Ellie ) Warner to come to next meeting of the Board to present their side of the matter. Messrs. Richards and Kellway were then advised by Mr. Emery relative to the consulting board of architects of the Planning Board. Mr. Richards indicated his appreciation of the value of such consulting architects and expressed a willingness to have Mr. Willard Brown advise customers of the Lexington Building Trust in regard to the general fitness of structures planned, for the surroundings, etc. He promised to cooperate in bringing the parties together as suggested. Street Lines. Mr. Hatch reported progress in securing released for "set-backs" from property owners on Massachusetts Ave., Bedford, Muzzey, Clark and Waltham Streets . The work being incomplete he was directed to continue with it. Adjourned at 10 P.M. to Thursday, March 26, 1925. Wm. D. Milne, Secretary. PLANNING BOARD MEETING II Tuesday, March 31, 1925. Town Hall, 8 P.M. Present: Chairman Emery, Messrs. J. 0. Tilton, C. E. Glynn, J. H. Duffy, W. D. Milne. Lexington Building Trust. In response to the Board"s invitation George A. Warner and his wife Ellie Warner were present and were heard relative to their attitude on proposed extension of Hancock Street ovef land of Lexington Building Trust and abutting theirs, and the offer to buy or trade for certain of their land at the rear of their lot to accomodate grades and curves of the proposed street. Chairman Emery endeavored to induce them to yield sufficiently to assure a suitable layout for the road but they showed disinclination to treat with the Lexington Building Trust. It was finally left that the proposed taking would be staked out so that they could see what it amounted to, also that there should be staked out a strip on the north of their lot to show what the Lexington Building Trust was willing to trade for the taking. The Warners were asked to consider the matter in the light of these representations and meet again with the Board at some time to be arranged later. Mr. J. 0. Richards was again heard as to the willing- ness of the Lexington Building Trust to do anything reasonable to satisy the Warners to such an extent that they would trade. He was asked to supply the town engineer with data to enable the latter to stake out the lines of the proposed street as affecting Warner property, and he promised this . Also he was urged to reconsider proposed street lines in the Lexington Building Trust property with a view to providing suitable through lines to the north, and to arrive as soon as possible at some final scheme of street layout for the property. The meeting adjourned with the understanding that the Board would later view the sites of the proposed streets above mentioned. Wm. D. Milne, Clerk. III PLANNING BOARD MEETING III April A 1925. Present: Chairman Emery, Messrs . Tilton, Worthen, Glynn and Milne. C. E. French, Town Engineer. Lexington Building Trust. The matter of Lexington Building Trust street location northerly from Burlington Street near Hancock Street along land of George A. Warner was discussed. Messrs . Emery, Glynn and Milne had previously viewed lines as staked out by Town Engineer showing the taking of Warner land desired by the Lexington Building Trust. It was voted that it was the sentiment of the Board that an agreement between the Lexington Building Trust and Warner, permitting the taking of a curved piece of Warner land was desirable, but that failing such an agreement, the street could be properly laid out without involving the Warner land. The clerk was directed to so inform these parties . (See copies of letters to Lexington Building Trust and Geo.A. Warner, dated April 28, 1925) . It was further voted to recommend to the Lexington Building Trust a further study of proposed location of streets in their development as follows : The Planning Board after examination of the premises and study of the Preliminary Plan dated December 1920, sub- mitted by the Lexington Building Trust, recommends to said Trust that an effort be made to lay out the proposed street leading northward from Burlington Street beside land of George A. Warner, in such a manner as to afford a direct through street substantially parallel to Burlington and Grove Streets to the street called Simonds Road, and eventually to Grove St. at such a point that the present sharp curves in Grove Street may be eliminated. The clerk' was directed to inform the Lexington Building Trust to this effect. Muzzey Street. The matter of building lines on Muzzey Street was dis- cussed, and the clerk was directed to invite James J. Carroll, P. F. Dacey, and E. H. Mara to meet with the Board on this matter, at its next sitting. The extension of Highland Ave .was discussed, and the Town Engineer was asked to secure certain data affecting drainage and street locations in that and nearby sections. Adjourned at 10. 15 to May 4, 1925. Wm. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING IV. May 4, 1925. Present : Chairman Emery, Messrs . Glynn, Duffy, Milne, and Town Engineer French. Hancock Birches development. Frank Cutter appeared with plan of land lying north of Adams Street at Meriam Street and east of Hancock Street at Revere St. and desired approval of a layout for a proposed street. He was directed to confer with the Town Engineer that full data as to properties and topography in the region north of Adams Street and east of Hancock Street might be made available to the Board in order that a decision in regard to the proposed street might be made intelligently. The Town Engineer was asked to secure and present the necessary plans and data. Muzzey Street. Messrs . Dacey, Mara, and Carroll appeared in response to the Board's invitation and considerations as to building line establishment on Muzzey Street were presented to them, they not having signed the desired releases . They would not promise to sign but agreed to think the matter over further. Adjourned 10.15 P.M. to May 14, 1925. W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING V. May 14, 1925. Present: Chairman Emery, Messrs . Tilton, Duffy, Worthen, Milne, and Town Engineer French. Public Cemetery. James G. Ramsay, 217 Massachusetts Ave., Lexington, representing Chamberlain & Burnham, Inc., Old South Building, Boston, appeared and stated that his firm had been commissioned by the Valhalla Cemetery Co. of Minneapolis (or similar name ) to secure a site for a public cemetery. Also, that the Bashar,farm, off Massachusetts Ave. had been selected as possibly suitable and had been found to be available. He asked for the consideration of the Board of the project, with a view to securing the necessary permits . After discussion which indicated that the site was on the Cambridge water supply watershed, that the location was such that the business success of the project was questionable, that the Zoning By-law at present prohibited such use, and that public sentiment would probably be against such a project, Mr. Ramsay was advised to secure and present further information as to his client' s standing, the guarantees they could offer, and the general conduct of like business of the concern else- where, if he felt that the proposal was worth pressing. Vine Brook. The matter of street layouts in the neighborhood of Vine Brook Road at its crossing of Vine Brook, and the general scheme for proposed street leading south from Mass. Ave. at Vine Brook were then discussed at length, with various suggestions . The Town Engineer was asked to prepare sketches showing possible arrangements, and the clerk was directed to invite Robert J. Ryder and H. M. Aldrich to be present at the next meeting of the Board, in order that their ideas of the development of the streets in this locality with respect to their extensive property holdings in the neighborhood might be known to the Board. Meeting adjourned at 10.30 P.M. Wm. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING VI. Thursday, May 21, 1925. Town Hall. Present: Chairman Emery, Messrs . Tilton, Worthen, Duffy, Glynn, Milne, and C. B. French, Town Engineer. Park Area. Plans by Arthur A. Shurtleff showing scheme for marginal roads in the Park area off Waltham Street and in the vicinity of the Pageant grounds were reviewed and met with general favor. H. M. Aldrich was present and stated that the general scheme in so far as it affected his properties was acceptable to him, especially the plan for dual roadway along Vine Brook both east and west of Waltham Street. Wilson Avenue. Then appeared J. A. Wilson of Wilson Ave. East Lexington, with C. J. Henrich and two others . Their plea was for the Board to approve an amendment to the Zoning By-law to permit two family houses to be built in the area comprising the J. A. Wilson property of 14-;27; acres lying south easterly from Wilson Avenue to the Arlington town line. It was represented that the property was to be sold, and unless the restrictions were removed to serve as an induce- ment to high grade builders, the property would be likely to fall into the hands of parties who would develop it in a manner unfavorable to the town and local interests . After consideration the Board unanimously voted not to favor the desired change in the By-law and the clerk was instructed to draft a letter to J. A. Wilson apprising him of this action. Meeting adjourned at 10.30 P.M. Wm. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING VII Thursday May 28, 1925. Town Hall. Present: All members and C. B. French, Town Engineer. Park Area. In response to the Board' s invitation there appeared Robert Ryder and Charles Ryder and to them was shown the Shurtleff sketch plan for scheme of marginal roads, and treat- ment of Vine Brook in the Park Area, off Forrest and Waltham Streets . They expressed favor for the general scheme. There was discussion of the relation of the Park lands south of Lincoln Streets to the general development and to complications on account of the Aldrich holdings in thie locality, and the legal actions brought by Aldrich. The Ryders agreed to take favorable action upon the suggestion that the Town, Aldrich and themselves jointly or severally use the advice of one land- scape architect in formulating the plans for the development of the park and their private lands in this locality. Vine Brook Road District. The Ryders being extensive land holders in the region south of Vine Brook Road along the South Branch of Vine Brook, they were asked as to their attitude toward certain proposed street development plans for this locality. They expressed themselves as favorably impressed with a scheme to run a highway south from Massachusetts Ave. at Vine Brook to connect with street system near Grapevine Corner, so-called, with the south branch of Vine Brook embraced by a roadway on either side. There was further discussion of the drainage problem in this area. Vine Brook drainage: Upon departure of the Ryders there was extended discussion of the legal and engineering considerations affecting the lowering of Vine Brook at Massa- chusetts Ave. Mr. French was asked to inquire of the Town Counsel as to the right of the town to enter upon property to make improvements in brooks, etc. Messrs . Milne and Duffy were asked to consider the adequacy of previous engin- eering plans for brook lowering at this point and to obtain a rough estimate of the cost of an improvement which might be considered to be adequate in view of indicated future conditions in this drainage area. Meeting adjourned at 10.30. Wm. D. Milne, Clerk. aa_ 111 PLANNING BOARD MEETING VIII. June 4, 1925. Town Hall. Present: Emery, Chairman. Messrs . Tilton, Duffy, Worthen, Milne, and Town r'ngineer French. "Hancock Birches ." In connection with the proposed development by Diehl & Co. of property off Hancock and Adams Streets, the Board studied the general topography and configuration of the entire tract between these streets from their junction to Burlington Street on the one hand and East Street on the other. It was agreed that an approximately direct connection from East Street to North Hancock Street was desirable, and from this a sketch of possible street lo- cations parallel to this, with certain cross streets was developed. Certain modifications in the street proposed for the Diehl property as shown on plan prepared by Frank Cutter, engineer, were favored to make this development fit in with the larger development of the whole tract. The sketch plan was turned over to Town Engineer French for refinement and further study. The Clerk was instructed to invite Diehl and Cutter to be present at the next meet- ing of the board to review the matter. Vine Brook Drainage. Messrs. Duffy and Milne reported briefly in regard to their study of the 1913 McClintock & Woodfall plan for the improvement of the brook at Massachusetts Ave. and south- ward. A more generous dimension for the culvert under Massachusetts Ave. was advised (32 sq. ft. against 24). A lowering of 2' -0 at Vine Brook Road was held to be barely sufficient if indeed so. An approximation of the cost of the improvement figured $50460,000. A taking 20 ft. wide along the brook north of Massachusetts Ave . to below Sherman Street was suggested. Meeting adjourned at 10 P.M. for one week. Wm. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING IX Town Hall, June 18, 1925. Present: ;Messrs . Ti3.ton, Worthen, Duffy, Milne, and Mr. French, Town Engineer. The meeting was called to order by the Clerk and Mr. J. H. Duffy was elected to act as Chairman in absence of Mr. Emery. Frank Cutter, Esq. , Engineer with Mr. Diehl appeared with reference to proposed street and lot layout of Hancock & Adams Streets, (Hancock Birches ) . Town Engineer French had prepared plan of surrounding territory and made tentative sketch for streets embracing a tie between East Street and North Hancock Street with secondary streets . The matter of securing a proper arrangement for proposed street and junction ofancock and Revere Streets was discussed at length and it was left that Mr. Diehl was to ap::roach Mr. Bull with a view to making exchanges of land which would allow a more favorable entry than that proposed over land already owned by Diehl. The meeting adjourned at 10.30 without date. PLANNING BOARD MEETING X. Town Hall, July 10, 1925. Present: J. H. Duffy, (acting chairman), Messrs . Worthen, Glynn, Tilton, Milne and Engineer French. Frank Cutter, Engineer, appeared with Stephon Trebino with sketch plan of proposed street off Utica Street. Engineer French had been over this matter. It was discussed and left with the understanding that i,iessrs . Cutter and French would study possible connecting streets and the surrounding area, and present a further scheme at the next meeting of the board. Yr. Cutter also presented a proposed lot and street plan for Walter Black for land off Highland Avenue . The plan was reviewed and it was suggested that allowance be made for proper setback of existing houses from the proposed new street, and that allowance be made for through street to lands at the south of Mr. Black' s property. It was left that Mr. Cutter was to submit a revised plan. Mr. Cutter reported for Mr. Diehl in regard to the "Hancock Birches" development, that Mr. Diehl had been unable to make any trade with. Er. Bull whereby land would be available to locate the proposednew street from Adams to Hancock so it would join with Hancock northerly from the triangle at Revere Street. It was the sense of the meeting that if proper dxchanges of land could be made to secure suitable curves at the junction with Hancock Street, the use of the strip belonging to Diehl for the street location would be acceptable . Mr. J. Henry Duffy was named as delegate for the board to attend a conference to be held between Messrs . Aldrich, Ryder, end Landscape architect Shurtleff for a discussion of a pre- liminary plan of street developments in the south and west branch areas of Vine Brook and contiguous to park lands of the Town. Dr. Tilton raised a question as to the employment of. Mr. Shurtleff, and there were other questions as to who was obligated for the expense of Mr. Shurtleff's work. Dr. Tilton was narndd to represent the Planning Board in opposition to the granting of permits for filling stations on Bedford Street, at Grapevine Corner, and at Massachusetts Avenue and Marrett Street, at hearings to be held shortly. There was mention of the Board' s stand in opposition to opening land at Bow Street and Massachuse'EY n BSr business use . The meeting adjourned at 10.30 for one week. PLANNING BOARD MEETING XI. Town Hall, July 17, 1925. Present : J. H. Duffy, E. B. Worthen, J. 0. Tilton, C. E. Glynn, W. D. Milne, also C. B. French, Engineer. Stephen Trebino, with Frank Cutter, appeared and the matter of new streets in Trebino land off Utica Street was further discussed end a scheme decided on. Iir. Stevens, owner of the sand and gravel works and land adjacent also was present and took part in the discussion. The matter was left for Engineer French to prepare duplicate plans of the road scheme for record with this Board and Board of Survey. Walter Black appeared with Frank Cutter to present plan for new streets and lots off Highland Avenue and Slocum Road extension. The matter of extending Slocum Road to provide opening to land beyond, was discussed. No decision was reached, and the meeting adjourned, finally, for six days to meet at Walter Black' s and view the ground. There was discussion in regard to the change in zoning law at Bow Street, and the clerk was instructed to write to the Selectmen suggesting urgent need for new layout for Bow Street to prevent development of bad conditions there. Meeting adjourned at 11 P.M. until July 23, 1925 gs noted. PLANNING BOARD MEETING XII. July 23, 1925. Present: Messrs . Duffy, Glynn, Worthen, Tilton and Milne of the Planning Board, also by invitation Town Engineer French, Walter G. Black and Frank P. Cutter. Meeting was held at premises of Walter G. Black off Highland Avenue where the territory was viewed in considerable detail. Adjournment was taken to Town Hall where kr. Black' s proposals for street development in his property was discussed. Mr. Black finally agreed to a way through his property to the southwesterly to allow for connection of an extension of Slocum Road through to an extension of Winthrop Road or another principal way into the territory to the south and the matter was left for him to have his engineer prepare the necessary plans for the development for submittal in final form. Mr.. Cutter then reported for Mr. Diehl in regard to the development of property known as Hancock Birches, off Hancock and Adams Streets . He stated that Mr. Diehl was agreeable to the suggestion that the strip of land extending to Hancock Street opposite Revere Street be used for street, and that excess area in this strip, not needed for street would if possible be swapped with adjoining owners in such a manner as to allow proper sweep curves to be made et the entry of new street from Hancock Street. Ir. French was asked to present to the Board duplicate blue prints indicating the Board's suggestion as to the development of this and contiguous areas in order that they might advise the Board of Survey in the matter. Mr. French was asked to provide duplicate blue-prints showing the Board' s suggestion in regard to street development in the area of Stephen Trebino ' s land off Utica and Woburn Streets . The meeting adjourned without date. PLANNING BOARD MEETING September 14, 1925. Present : F. L. Emery, 'hairman, C. E. Glynn, J. H. Duffy and W. D. Milne of the Board. C. B. French, Town Engineer. Mr. Emery reviewed the work of the Board during his absence in July and August. The matter of the Trebino layout off Utica Street was mentioned and Mr. French promised to have duplicate prints of the Board 's plan for this area furnished in time for the hearing of the Board of Survey on September 22, 1925. The matter of the layout for Walter G. -clack off Highland Avenue was mentioned and it was voted to recommend to the Board of Survey that they secure from Walter G. Black an easement for drainage purposes over a strip 10 feet wide from the junction of proposed extension of Slocum Road and proposed street south of and parallel to Highland Avenue to the town drain in this locality, all in accordance with an understanding existing between C. B. French, Town Engineer and Frank P. Cutter, and understood to be agreeable to ':7alter G. Black. Frank P. Cutter appeared for Ernest Macphee with reference to desired layout of streets in property of the latter off Reed Street . The locality was discussedand sugges- tions for development were offered. Mr. Cutter and Mr. French were asked to collaborate and prepare a plan showing topography and existing streets in the region bounded by Hill, Bedford, Reed, Grove and Cedar Streets, in order that the Board might be properly acquainted with the conditions and possibilities of the whole before proceeding to pass on the particular proposals for Macphee. Mr. Emery reviewed the status of the matters affecting the Aldrich, Dyder and Town interests in the south and west branch basins of Vine Brook and promised to re&e -. .r , 4-4, 4 -s ding with Mr. Ryder. Meeting adjourned at 10 P.L . to Tuesday September 29. PLANNING BOARD MEETING TO`411. HALL LEXINGTON, MASS. September 29, 1925. Present, F. L. Emery, J. U. Tilton, J. H. Duffy, W. D. Milne. Plan of proposed layout for Joseph Street for Pichette and Ahern, off Massachusetts Avenue and Maple Street, East Lexington, was presented and discussed. It appeared that these owners also had land easterly of the railroad right of way, and that it would be well to consider allowance for a crossing of the railroad in connection with the new street, in view of the fact that Maple Street afforded the only practicable crossing except at grade now present in a con- siderable distance. The petitioners were asked to confer with the town engineer in order that plans of the whole area might be laid before the Board for its consideration of the matter. Mr. Emery outlined discussions which he had had with P+essrs . Alrich & Ryder relative to land of the former off Lincoln Street in the vicinity of park properties . Mr. Emery reported that Mr. Ryder had purchased the interior land in the Cary Farm development area. Mr. Emery was to review with Mr. Ryder and the town engineer the possibility of preserving the rights of way for entry into this area with a view to future streets along lines suggested or discussed by the Planning Board at the time the development first came before them. Mr. Duffy reported in regard to his investigation of the matter of handling drainage projects through the State Drainage Commission. After discussion it was voted to recommend to the selectmen that they proceed through the town council to secure from the Legislature an act sirrilar• to acts already made in behalf of Belmont, Wakefield, Milton, etc . enabling the selectmen to proceed in drainage matters as they do as a Board of Survey in street matters, to make necessary takings, secure easements, apportion betterments,etc. Mr. Duffy was appointed to confer with the Selectmen and Town Council in regard to the matter. Meeting adjourned at 10.00 P.M. without date. W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING LEXINGTON, MASS. Town Hall October 19, 1925. Present: Messrs . Emery, Tilton, Worthen, Duffy and Town Engineer French. Messrs . Pichette and Ahern presented plans of Joseph Road East Lexington for approval. The Board voted to approve a sketch plan prepared et the meeting and signed by the Town Engineer, said plan amending the plan of the petitioners so as to provide for a future road crossing the railroad and also for an extension northwesterly to the Burns land adjoining, -minor adjustments and exchange of lands being necessary between petitioners and one Kennedy to provide for a desirable approach at this latter extension. The petitioners agreed to negotiate with Miss ( ? ) Kennedy to perfect the plan, - minor changes in radii of curves and engineering details to be permitted in accordance with the Town Engineer's directions . Formal hearing is to be held by board of Survey October 20 next, and Mr. Emery agreed to represent the Planning Board at the hearing. A plan was presented showing a projected street called Blake Avenue from Edgwood Road on land of Blake . The plan being substantially different from a general plan of this locality approved by the Planning Board in the past and no provision being made for rounding the corner of said street with Edgewood Road at land of 111 Earle, the Board voted not to approve the layout and to request the petitioner Mr. Wadman to furnish more data with respect to trees, etc. so that the possibility of a locstion more in harmony with that which the Board formerly approved, may be studied. Mr. Emery reported the result of conferences with Messrs . Ryder and Aldrich with reference to lands abutting the playground areas . Discussion was had as to the feasibility of delegating certain of the Board's activities to sub-committees, in the hope that minor details may consume less time at regulator meeting, and that the Board may devote more time to broader policies, such as major thoroughfares, building lines, etc. Meeting adjourned at 10.30 to Monday October 26 at 8 P.M. J. H. Duffy, Clerk. ( Pro tem) . PLANNING BOARD MEETING T OV''N HALL Lexington, Mass . October 26, 1925. Present: Mr. Emery, Chairman, Dr. J. O. Tilton, Messrs . J.H. Duffy, W. D. Milne, C . B. French, Town Engineer. Henry C. Rowland of Arlington, appeared with Tebbets, Building Inspector, presenting matters pertaining to lot and street development in property off Massachusetts Ave. between Slocum Road. and Bloomfield St. He was urged to make allowances for a street development that could be acceptable to the town. He was asked to cooperate with the Town Engineer and appear at the next meeting with plan and sufficient data for the whole area between Massachusetts Ave. , Slocum Road, and Bloomfield St . so that the Planning Board might intelligently discuss the proposition and a suitable street location be found. He agreed to do this . Mr. Wadman appeared with further reference to the Blake Ave. development. There was a long discussion of the iniquities of departing from plans previously agreed upon by the Planning Board and all interested parties in this neighborhood, and proceeding on plans of a nature wholly unacceptable to the public interest without consulting either the Planning Board or the Board of Survey. The plan for the Blake Ave . riadman development) as prepared by Engineer Cutter was discarded, and a more suitable street location was shown. Engineer r'rench agreed to work out the details and submit a suitable plan at meeting November 2, preparatory to the Board of Survey hearing on this matter set for November 3. One Dreselley, erecting a house on lot in former Merriam land on line of proposed Blake Ave. location was advised to suspend building operations until Eine of proposed street was fixed by the Board of Survey. It was suggested that Engineer Cutter be warned to govern himself by Planning Board proposals in street matters and not to proceed to suit his own or his client' s fancy without consulting with the Board where studies had been made. Meeting adjourned at 10 P.N. till Monday November 2, 1925. W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. TOWN HALL Lexin_gton,Monday,November 2,1925. Present: F. L. Emery, Chairman, Messrs. Tilton, Glynn, Worthen, Duffy, Milne, Town Engineer French. Henry C. Rowland appeared with further regard to proposed development of old Fitch Estate off Massachusetts Avenue and Bloomfield. The Town Engineer had prepared a plan of this property and after discussion, a road approxi— mately parallel to Slocum Road was laid down on the plan, and was deemed suitable and acceptable. Insofar as it lay upon land of the petitioner or land bounden to him, this road location was voted proper for presentation to the Board of Survey. There was brief discussion of the Wadman -- Blake Avenue matter, and after slight modification the Town Engineer's plan for this street was voted acceptable to present to Board of Survey. W. D. Milne was asked to represent the Planning Board at the Board of Survey hearing on November 3. Meeting adjourned at 9.40 P.M. W. D. Milne. Clerk. At Board of Survey Hearing November 3, 1925 Messrs. Duffy and Milne were present, also Messrs. Wadman, Dresselly, E. P. Merriam, etc. Town Engineer' s plan of "Blake Avenue" (as amended) was acceptable to all. It was suggested that the Board of Survey proceed to lay out the remainder of this road through the Goodwin property and Mr. Merriam was asked to secure necessary signatures from Mrs. Goodwin, which he promised. It was proposed to call the street Goodwin Road rather than Blake Avenue. W. D. Milne. PLANNING BOARD MEETING TO'`'N HALL. Lexington, Mass . November 10, 1925. Present : F. L. Emery, Chairman, J. H. Duffy, W. D. Milne and C. B. French, '.Lown "engineer. This meeting was limited in its scope to a general review of the matters before the Board and to a discussion of procedure . Mr. Duffy outlined certain failures of the present system of making sewer assessments and cited the practice in other towns, it being apparent 111 that Lexington was not securing suitable returns on the outlay for sewers. Mr. Emery proposed a division of labor among: the several members of the Board with a view to securing greater efficiency in action. The delegation of certain matters to certain members was proposed. 74. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING LEXINGTON, MASS. Town Hall, December 5,1925. Present: Emery, Chairman, Messrs . Tilton, Worthen, Duffy, Glynn, Milne, and Mr. French, Town Engineer. The meeting was called by Mr. Emery for discussion of three matters : 1 . Sentiment of the Board with relation to the service street planned to extend from Sherman to Meriam Street between Mass . Ave. and B. & M. R.R. in its bearing on possible location of Cary Memorial Building on the Blake-Plumer property. After discussion it was unanimously voted: "That while it was the unanimous opinion of the Planning Board that the Cary Memorial Building should not be placed on the so-called Blake-Plumer site because said site is destined to be in the midst of the future congested business zone of the town, if the Trustees under the will, having the matter in charge determine that such building if tendered and accepted must be located on such site, the proposed service street to be built between Mass. Ave. and the B. & M. R.R. may be terminated at each side of the Memorial Building lot or deviated across said lot in such a manner as not to obstruct the placing of such Memorial Building thereon," 2. Veterans ' Hospital. Mention was made of the possibility of the sale of the so-called Simonds property off Burlington and Grove Streets to the United States for site for a veterans ' hospital, and of the endorsement given by the selectmen as individuals, the Legion Post, and the Board of Trade, to efforts to secure this project. Attention was called to the burdens of cost due to withdrawal of land from taxation and the reconstruction of streets, laying of water mains, etc. that the erection of sucha plant would put upon the town. Other phases of the matter such as the danger due to class of patients and the availability of a site in Bedford where the town had voted for the project, were mentioned. It was decided not to take action, as a Board, to oppose the project, although in general the members seemed to hold the project in disfavor insofar as it appeared to affect the ultimate good of the Town. 2 II3. Curtailment of train service by B. & M. R. R. Mr. Emery reported that the B. & M. R.R. was determined to reduce the train service and was threatening to limit such service to two trains daily each way. He, with other citizens of influence, was endeavoring to secure agreement on the part of the railroad to provide three trains daily each way, at better times. He asked if the Board would vote to favor improving the Bus service by arranging for through service to Harvard Square . After discussion it was decided that it was not properly within the scope of the Boardts duties to move in such a matter. Lie wort of the Planning, 3oard for the Year 1925. • The Panning Board, except during the Summer months, has met IIpretty nearly every week, the Town ax ;ineer as a rule witting in at its meetings. A wide diversity of problems and. matters are being catstant- ly presented for consideration by the Board and frequently the more press- ing s-Raller problems interfere seriously with the consideration of the larger and more important ones. : or a considerable period it seemed as if scarcely a week passed without some petitioner a9pesiring before Vie 3oard ztatin; t'Akt he had bought this or that place and desired to cut it up into house lots and lag out streets to serve the same, so that he might begin building operations at once. In such instances the practice of the Board has been to call for surveys of the property and then sit down with tic: new owner and work out a layout that would give to him, so far as possible, the number of lots he is entitled to have, but so ar- raed and with streets or street extensions so laid down, as to tie in with present or prospective streets in adjoining properties. Unless this be done in every instance, the to;gyn would find itself with a large num- ber of separated developments utterly incapable of beirk.7 tied together as a part of a unified development of the larger area of which they may form parts. ;:i ile in many instances the Board has found the owners somewhat reluctant at first to accept the delay necessary to this more complete working out of the plans, it is believed that in every instance the plans eventually recommended. by the Board and accepted by the owner have furnished the latter a more satisfactory development from every point of view, than what had been originally- in mind when they came be- fore the Board. uestions are constantly arising in connection with the Zonirg Law IIcalling for interpretations of the latter and. for cooperation between the representatives of the town and property owners in reducing to concrete form the general provisions of the law itself. i2- • Among the larger problems requiring consideration and upon which the Board has devoted. considerable time is that of throuch and through streets, referred to in the last report. k;ork upon thin problem can only progress as the Town 7ngineer is able to furnish necessary plans . Substantial progress has been made in gathering the necessary data, and it is hoped that by another year some definite recommendations may be possible. 7he problem itself is of great importance to the town be- cause such throu(;h streets furnish the ground work to which all loom developments mu t be fitted and, to the extent that the throu h streets are lair down, to that extent will we be able to control local develop- ments. evelop- ments. A good deal of time has been devoted to the matter of development of the park property extending from `„`altbam Street to the State goad and to the related development of the property between Waltham Street and I assachusetts avenue . iielative to the park section of this property, we found the town blocked by private interests that seemed to prevent nec- essary development to make available all the town lands and, after con.- siderable delay, the Board is able to report a change in ownership of certain parcels that bide fair to make it much easier to handle the problem than has heretofore been possible . However, actual development of the park lauds as well as of the lands in the Vine Brook area below altham Street can only pro,:rens as the development of the drainage prob- lem progresses, and. here, again, much study has been given to the problem presented by the passage of Vine Brook under Massachusetts .venue and the railroad, at which points the brook must inevitably be lowered. to make 4 the lands available and profitable, and this in turn will involve a very large sum of money. Believing it to be inexpedient to undertake anything of the sort without adequate provision for obtaining such return as would be justified, the Planning Board, in consultation with the Selectmen and -3- Town angineer, ha: caused to be presented to the Legislature a bill con- solidating and broadening the provisions for drainage in Lexington and permitting the assessment of betterments in a way that will, in the opin- ion of the Board, make it entirely possible in the near future to bring forward a comprehensive plan for the drainage and improvement of the en- tire areas in question and, at the eame time, avail of such improvements to cover, in large part at least, the drainage costs. The cooperation of the State engineering force has been availed of in this connection. It has seemed to the Planning :hoard that the present method of assessing costs for sewer extension is quite unfair to the town, inthat the individual property owners served by dewer extensions were called up- on to pay altogether too small a fraction of the cost of construction , the town as a whole paying the larger part. When it is realized that the town to date has paid more than eighty thousand dollars for sewer construction, it is apparent how small an amount the property owners Liao have been serv- ed have paid. Believing a continuance of the present inequitable system would be ruinous, the Planning Board, in conjunction with the selectmen and Town Council, has prepared a bill which has been filed in the Legis- lature, seeking an amendment to the newer law to permit assessments upon the property owners immediately benefited to be substantially increased -- approximately to one-half the cost of construction. This bill, together with that upon the drainage question above referred to, if passed by the Legislature, will be presented to the town for acceptance and, if accept- ed, will prove exceedingly useful. Anothe . problem that has occupied much time of the ]oard has been that relating to water main extensions. The present method of assessing costs for extension of water mains requires the benefited petitioners to pay ten per cent upon the cost of extensions for a period not to exceed ten yeses. Since the petitioning property owners are thus called span • -4- to carry for a period of years the entire burden of construction cost, it has been the nractiee of the town to install mains of sufficient cap- acity only, to serve these petitioning miners. '';'he result has been that today Lexington is said to have a larger number of miles of six-inch water mains than nay town in the metropolitan district. ix-inch mains are too small to serve any considerable areas of the town, anti it is a question of but a short time when our insurance rates will be raised, be- cause of inadequate water mains. The Planning 3oard has, after much study, worked out an amexulment to the By-Laws, which it proposes to brig g forward, authorizing the: assessment upon the petitioning owners so much only of the capacity of the extensions as their local requirements call for, permitting the town to install mains ;,s much larger than called for by local requirements as may be deemed necessary to take care of connect- ed or further areas. In this manner we shall get away from the further unlimited extension of six-inch water tains and secure a larger extension of eight-inch and larger mains. Completion of the program for establishment of building lines has been necessarily held. back by pressure of more iraiportarit work, but it has not been abandoned, in fact, is actively vniler way, but progressing more slowly than anticipated. The matter of an advisory board of architects, referred to in the last annual report, has not worked out satisfactorily, Pressure of other matters has prevented the Board from lying to this the attention it woald have been glad to ;give to it., but it has been impossible to revise the plan or to push it to active usefulness. Among the local problems that have come before the :board for consideration have been the following:- Layout of extension of Slocum Road and other streets off Kiehlaad telLAvenue land of ?'alter Black, tep /rod ::;.gni submitted to Board of our- vey; consideration of development of streets and land of :.acI'hee and. lib others off Reed Street off Lexington, still pending; l eouL for streets in land of Pichette and Ahern off assachusett. Avenue and. Maple Street, East Lexington, acceptable plan recommended to Board of +:survey; considera- tion of plan for street extension in connection with the land. between ;rcadia Avenue and Lowell •`.:treete reeopmendation made to-Board of survey; laeout for land and house lots on What was Fitch property, between Bloom- field Street and Slocum Aoed, recently purchased by H. C. _ o:71and, accept- able plan recommended. to T,oard of Survey. °4-Aili J''l`'Ill , iedekes .- The: .lannine 3oard, after full consideration, voted to oppose the location of veterans' insane hospital in Lexington. Yioldinee to no one in respect for our World War veterans and what they did in the service of our Country, if Lexington had been the only practicable site for such a hospital, no objection would have been made; a careful investigation, II however, showed that engineering problems were serious, that the costs that would have been imposed upon the town, both iemediately and cover- ing succeeding years, were such that the town could ill afford to invite them when equally available sites were to be had in adjoining towns, where the problems were not so great arid would not prove so burdensoes. The ultimate deoisi.: n, es now announced, to place the hospital in Becifcmd, is understood to have been based mainly upon engineering and construction- al grounds and not upon any sentimental grounds or preference. `.she claim so earnestly advanced in behalf of the project, that the advent of the hospital would have been a great thing for the town and mead have brought much business to its tradesmen, is upon no higher basis than the objections Which have been criticised so severely, that the advent of tee hospital would injure property values and bring a tax burden upon the town. It is as selfish to desire the hospital for personal gain and profit as to ob- ject to it on the ground that it would bring a burden of expense. =' y other problems have cone before the Board and have been the sub- - 0 ec-'kmof thbrouh disCussion L116 have :Involved cosi work, which it seems uallQcessary here to touch upon. The -lembers Of the 3oaaN1 have cooptrated he 1r LI the work and have sacrificed muca of time aul personal cotvpionce to the problems before thorn . Respectulli sbultted, Feb. , 1926. II I 1926 PLANNING BOARD Frederick L. Emery J. Henry Duffy Edwin B. Worthen C. Edward Glynn William D. Milne Arthur W. Freeman PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, January 7, 1926 . Present: F. L. Emery, Chairman, Messrs . Worthen, Duffy, Tilton, Glynn, Milne. Also C. B. French, Town Engineer and Tibbets, Building Inspector. Zoning Law. Mr. Tibbets asked information as to the Zoning Law with special reference to business district at North Lexington, also asking for definition of bound of the business district at East Lexington now set by old Childs Garage building which is to be removed. He raised the question as to the permissibility of altering the present non-conforming Harrod store at East Lex- ington into two stores . Vine Brook Drainage. A letter from Engineer Churchill of the State Re- clamation Board was read, indicating Mr. Churchill' s belief that a cleaning of Vine Brook would relieve immediate diffi- culties and that the Town had ample power to proceed. Messrs. Duffy and Milne were asked to consult with him further. General Dra. na e Act. Mr. Duffy reported that the new empowering act drafted by the town counsel along lines similar to acts of other towns was in the hands of representative Perry, and that the matter was proceeding in regular course. Vine Brook Road. Mr. Emery noted the construction of an addition to the Viano garage, bringing the structure to the westerly line of the proposed street from Mass . Ave . to Vine Brook hoad, and queried as to the status of this road. It was noted that the Board was still on record as in favor of the 100 ft. taking for this road, in order that the town might have a free hand in any brook improvement at this location. Sewer Assezments . Mr. Duffy presented a draft of an act relative to assessing for sewer construction, and there was general dis- cussion. The matter was left for further immediate study by Mr. Emery and Mr. Duffy. Veterans' Hospital. It was unanimously voted that the Planning Board was opposed to the proposition for having the Veterans Hospital in Lexington. Parking. Mr. Worthen reported that present 30 minute parallel parking in the business area had afforded relief for the present . It was voted that the sub-committee continue to study the general matter, out that they need not press the matter unless other propositions appeared. - 2 - I School House Site . Mr. Worthen reported that Mr. Mara had not yet called a meeting of the representatives of the various boards interested in this matter. Meeting adjourned 11 P.M. for one week. . D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD ILEETING Lexington Town Hall, January 15, 1926 . Present: Chairman Emery, Messrs . Worthen, Tilton, Glynn, Duffy, Milne and Engineer French,also Mr. Wrightington, Town Counsel. This meeting was devoted entirely to discussion of the proposed sewer tax assessment problem, with a final arrangement of the legislative bill to be filed by Mr . Wrightington on January 16 . The time permitted for filing was limited and it was felt that the method adopted for the assessments should be very carefully reviewed, and gone over by the selectmen, they having asked the Board to review the matter . Wm. D. Milne, Clerk. 2 ,c6 PLANIJIEG BOARD MEETING Lexington Town Hall, January 22, 1926. Present: Chairman Emery, Messrs . :'iorthen, Duffy, Glynn, Milne . Stephen Trebino appeared, uninvited, with Mr. Stevens, and asked for information as to layout of street through his property, in particular as to why it was 42 feet wide . It was explained it was so intended, and that the Board Could countenance no "spite strip." He also inquired as to permissibility under zoning by-lay of manufacturing concrete blocks on his land. The matter of feasibility or desirability of a town forest was brought up. It seemed the general opinion that with the development prospects in Lexington such a project would hardly be worth while, though forest planting at the reservoir and on tax title town lands in Tophet swamp was mentioned. There was a review of the various matters pending before the Board or open for its consideration, and a long discussion on the matter of street acceptance and of the general plan of levies and guarantees for the laying of water mains . Wm. D. ,Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING February 9, 1926. Present: Chairman Emery, Messrs . Tilton, Duffy, Worthen, Glynn and Milne. Mass . Ave. Ir. Emery reported the selectmen' s proposal to reduce the curve on the avenue below Pleasant Street near Oak Street, East Lexington, in connection with set-back releases, etc. The matter of street line and set-backs along north side of the avenue near town hall and Edison sub- station was presented in the light of proposed construction of store block on the intervening lot . Mr. Emery reviewed his discussions with the owners . He agreed to suggest to the selectmen the advisability on early establishment of a new street line from Woburn to Grant Street, a new taking and building line from Grant Street to we't of Town Hall lot and a new building line thence to LIeriam Street. General. There was a general discussion of legislative matters pending on sewer and drainage acts, and on future policy in regsrd to charges for water main extensions . PLANNING BOARD MEETING. Tuesday, March 2, 1926. Present: Chairman Emery, Messrs . Worthen, Duffy, Freeman, Milne, also Messrs . French and Ross . This meeting was devoted to a discussion of the features of the proposed sewer, drainage and highway bills, and their presentation to the town meeting. March 4, 1926 Messrs . Duffy and Milne appeared before the Selectmen to further secure their support and understanding of the sewer, drainage, and highway matters sponsored by the Planning Board. March 7, 1926 Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Worthen, Glynn and Milne had an informal review of the matters to be presented at town meeting, and arranged for the presentation. W. D. Milne, Clerk. 111 PLANNING BOARD MEETING LEXINGTON, MASS. April 27, 1926 . Present: Chairman Emery, Messrs . Glynn, Worthen, Freeman, Duffy and Milne . 1. Discussion of areas susceptible to improvement by reason of brook lowering,etc . These areas outlined on map. 2. Schofield presented a Mr. Boss, who had plans of an apartment house for corner of Waltham St. and Vine Brook Road and wan ted business district extended about 99 ft. farther on Vine Brook Road to accomodate it . He was asked to present his plea and plans in more definite form. Board did not appear very favorable toward such a change . 3. L. Ryder asked the Boardts approval of request to establish a business district at Lowell, North, and Blanchard Streets . The Board voted unanimously to approve this, and Mr. Ryder agreed to do the necessary work for the hearing, etc. Mr. Ryder agreed to grant any land for widening,etc . , to protect the highway development. 4. Presented to the Selectmen the drafts of explanatory discussions of the sewer assessment and drainage acts to be published with the warrant for the May 13 meeting. Also urged that a comprehensive scheme for land, street, and brook development be completed before expenditures were made on work in the critical drainage areas . Adjourned 11.45 P. M. W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. Lexington, Mass . Tuesday, May 11, 1926 . 5 P.M. Present; Messrs . Worthen, Glynn, Milne . This was a hearing relative to amendment of the Zoning By-law to permit a building district at LoNell and North Sts . , called upon oral petition of R. L. Ryder under initiative of the Planning Board. Mr. Worthen was elected to act as chairman. There appeared Mr. Currier who opposed the creation of this business zone on the grounds of damage which he claimed would be done to his business at Woburn and Lowell Street, a mile distant . Miss Fairbanks appeared and asked that the business zone be extende:i to embrace a part of her land. Mr. Mercandante was not opposed. Mr. George Evans favored. Mr. Saul gave no opinion. Mr. Ryder favored. After hearing all parties the Planning Board voted: As required under Section 24, to recommend that the Zoning By-law be amended in the following particular; namely that a business district be established at the locality of the junction of Lowell and North Streets, specifically as follows : On both sides of Lowell Street a distance of 300 ft . northerly and southerly from the point of intersection of center lines of Lowell Street and North Street northwesterly, and on both sides of North Street a distance of 250 feet from the point of intersection of the center lines of Lowell and North Streets northwesterly, and on both sides of North Street north easterly a distance of 200 feet from the intersection of the center lines of Lowell and North otreets northeasterly, subject to provisions of section 18 of the Zoning By-law. And further, that the Planning Board recommends that the Selectmen take the necessary action to secure proper street widenings on both Lowell and North Streets at this location. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass . May 21, 1926. Present:Emery, Chairman. Members, Worthen, Duffy, Glynn, Freeman, Milne. Mr. Joseph Swan appeared relative to plans for development of real estate off Vine St. and Hayes Lane . After review of his plan he was asked to present topographical and more extended data, as the board was unwilling to approve any plan where the data was in- sufficient to permit of a comprehensive viewing of the case . It was voted: - That the Selectmen be urged to request the County Commissioners to take action on the petition now before them asking establishment of the boundaries of numerous streets in the town, and as set forth in a communication sent to the Selectmen several years ago by the former Town Engineer. The State Highway Commission having stated that they would not undertake the construction of Bedford St. unless a 60 ft. way was established, the Selectmen had called on the Board for the building set-back releases secured some time ago. A discussion of the development of Bedford St. as a main through highway, brought out the desirability of deflecting this traffic from the center and lower Mass. Ave . It was voted:- That the Planning Board recommend to the Selectmen that suitable action be taken to secure the layout as a town way of at least 50 ft. in width, East Street from Lowell Street to Adams Street, a new way in continuation of East St. to Hancock St. at or near the junction of North Hancock Street substantially as shown on the accompanying blue print of Town Engineer' s plan of June 10, 1925; and that the Selectmen consider also the advisability of widening North Hancock St. easing the curves or otherwise fitting it to receive through traffic from Bedford St. to Lowell St ., so that the passing of this heavy traffic through the center of the town may be avoided. The matter of set-back releases on Mass . Ave . was again brought up. In view of recent construction it was agreed that a width of 96 ft. for the Avenue through the business zone was sufficient. The Town Engineer was directed to proceed with the laying down of new lines in this area so that the drawing of new releases might go forward. It was voted to secure the releases by sections, and not attempt a covering of the entire length at one time. Adjourned, 10.30 . Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. LEXINGTON, MASS. Tuesday, June 8,1926 . Present: Messrs . "Emery, Worthey, Duffy, Freeman and Milne. The Board attended the hearing called by the Selectmen on the matter of location of East Street and the extension of same over now private lands to Hancock Street at No. Hancock Street . The hearing was well attended by owners of abutting land and the project appeared to meet with favor, though some ob- jected owing to lack of definite information as to how much individual property was affected by the pro- posed new lines on East Street . After stating the reasons and inducements for the project, and some discussion, Mr. Emery finally moved that the hearing be continued to a later date, the plans of the project completed and put in such shape that each landowner might see exactly how his property would be affected. He also suggested that a plan be furnished to each landowner interested, showing his individual property involved. The matter was so left for further hearing. The Selectmen then asked the views of the Board on the general matter of gasoline filling stations . Mr. Emery presented, as his own view of the matter, a plea for strict limitation of such establishment on account of their general effect on appearance of the town, assessable values, traffic complications , and needs for such facilities . There was specific dis- cussion of such projects at Cottage and Woburn Streets, and on Capper land at Grapevine Corner. In connection with the latter matter, the Select- men charged the Planning Board with the duty of studying the possibilities for development of the Capper back land in connection wit: PLANNING BOtRD MEETING. LEXINGTON, MASS. June 21, 1926. Present: Mr. Emery, Chairman. Messrs . Worthen, Duffy, Glynn, Freeman, Milne and Town Engineer French. Messrs . Glynn, Freeman, Duffy, French and Milne viewed the Hinchey Road vicinity. On return, the matter of approving Hinchey Road as a proper loca- tion for a Board of Survey Street, the Board voted to recommend that a layout be made in the vicinity, and that data on land lines and topography in the whole area be secured, but was prepared to give no opinion as to Hinchey Road, before such data were available. (See copy of vote herewith) . The '.`I. P. Gorman plan for Lexington Park street development was reviewed and it was voted to recommend for approval the plan as exhibited, provided that all owners were agreeable . ( See copy of vote herewith) . Mr . Duffy suggested that in order to better control developers and make the Board work effective, a formal petition should be lodged with the Board of Survey covering the matter before the Planning Board consider the plans with a view to making a recommendation and that thereafter the Board of Survey should either approve or disapprove the plan and file a definite record of the matter, in accordance with the law. The Town Engineer was not ready with the data on the Capper land and Grapevine Corner. The Town Engineer reported progress on establishment of lines on Mass . Ave . from Woburn Street to Town Hall. The Bcm. rd voted to request the Town Engineer to provide a plan for a street between Reed and Bedford Streets, and land of Gorman and Meady with a view to having the layout of such a street recommended to the Board of Survey. PLANNING BOARD MEETING LEXINGTON TOM HALL July 8, 1926. Present: E. B. Worthen, (acting Chairman) , J. H. Duffy, C . E. Glynn, W. D. Milne, C . B. French. The petition of Catherine F. Herbert and Erma E. Hargrove for an amendment to the Zoning By- law creating a business district at the junction of Marrett St. and Massachusetts Ave . was read. Mr. and Mrs . Herbert were present and there was informal discussion of the matter. The Board then voted to set a date for public hearing on the matter as re- quired, and named Frday, August 13, 1926 at 8 P.M. at the Town offices. There was then discussion of the treatment of Grapevine Corner with special reference to the Capper land. It was decided that the Board was not called upon to render a formal opinion on the matter 11 of a filling station permit at this location. The discussion was then confined to the matter of the treatment of the corners . It was finally voted: "The Planning Board recommends that the Selectmen take such measures as may be necessary to secure permanently as open plots the areas at Grape- vine Corner, so-called, designated "Grass plot" on Town Engineer' s sketch plan dated July 8, 1926, and futhermore, that if the Selectmen see fit to grant per- mit or permits for filling stations at this location, they further secure the arrangement of drives and sidewalks designated on the same plan, to be so main- tained during such use of the area, securing however a treatment of all the corners harmonious with that specifically shown for the Capper corner." There was some discussion in regard to the development of the Capper back areas, but no decision was reached. The meeting adjourned at 11.40 P.M. Planning Board Meeting. Lexington, Mass . August 13, 1926. Hearing on petition of Catherine F. Herbert and Erma E. Hargrove for change in the Zoning By- law to create a business district at Marrett Street and Massachusetts Avenue was called at 8 P.M. F. L. Emery, Chairman and W. D. Milne present, also C . B . French,Town Engineer. It was pleaded that the tract was unsuitable for other than business use , that establishment of a filling station was in view and that this would serve an actual need, and serve to break up the night parking in the vicinity. It then developed that Mrs . Hargrove desired to have business privelige on other lands not covered by the petition. Accordingly the chairman agreed to call a new hearing on initiative of the board, widening the scope of the hearing. Date of further hearing was set as September 3, 1926 . W. D. Milne, Clerk. Planning Board Meeting. Lexington, Mass . Meeting of Planning Board held in Town Hall at 8 P.M. September 3, 1926. Present: Messrs . Worthen and Glynn, the former acting as Chairman and the latter as Clerk pro-tem. First business was a hearing of petitions for establishment of a business zone at junction of Massachusetts Avenue and Marrett Street involving land of Herbert and Hargrove . Mr . Herbert and Mrs . Hargrove appeared in support of petition. Laura J. Kane appeared to support her petition that zone be extended to include present site of her house on northerly side of Massachusetts Ave. , a distance of about 400 feet from its junction 11 with Marrett Street. No one appeared in opposition. Hearing adjourned at 8.15 P.M. Joseph Swan appeared to submit contour map of his proposed developments off of Vine Street which was filed for further consideration by the Board. Meeting adjourned at 8.30 P.M. C . E. Glynn, Acting Clerk. Planning Board Meeting. Lexington, Mass . September 21,1926. Present: Emery, Chairman; Worthen, Duffy, Glynn, Milne and C. B. French. Bacon Development: Anthony Doherty of Lincoln, representing Trustees of the Bacon R.E. Trust appeared with reference to the land on Lockwood Avenue and Massachusetts Avenue near Maple Street and its possible developments . The status of the matter with the Board of Survey was left to be ascertained. It was found that they had refused to accept layout proposed by Bacon. Lots 1 to 11 had been sold, and a doubtful agreement for sale of Lot 16 made . The Town Engineer was left to prepare a sketch of the area and its possible suitable development. W. Benj . C . Meady appeared with reference to his land between Bedford and Reed Streets in connection with the development of Gorman land. The engineer was left to complete the plan of this area. Acting on petition of Catherine F. Herbert and Erma E. Hargrove as extended in scope by agreement and looking to an amendment of the Zoning By-law, and subsequent to duly advertised hearings of August 13 and September 3, 1926 at which all parties desiring to be heard were heard, the five members of the Planning Board present voted unanimously in opposition to the establish- ment of any business district at or near the junction of Massachusetts Avenue and Marrett Street, and further ordered that a record of this vote be transmitted to the petitioners with the statement that the reasons for this action included the following: That there was no local need to be served by the establishment of such a district, that the needs of the highway through traffic was already sufficiently served by developments less than a mile distant in either direction, and that the establishment of such a district would eventually lead to a develop- ment not conducive to the best interests of the town and the preservation of its historic areas . Mr. Emery outlined progress on Vine Brook and Park development plan. The board examined the proposed agreement for releases looking to the establishment of a building line on the north easterly side of Massachusetts Avenue from the Town Hall to Woburn Street and voted to proceed in the matter. - 2 - Mr. Duffy presented his recommendations in regard to the laying out of certain streets by the County Commissioners, and he was asked to prepare this report in the form of a letter to the Board of Survey. The meeting adjourned at 11 P.M. till Friday October 1, 1926. W. D. Milne, Clerk. MEMO In response to request of the Selectmen, Messrs. Emery, Duffy, and Milne of the Planning Board met with them on Tuesday, September 28, 1926. There was discussion of the adoption of the policy of allowing set-backs or building lines in residential districts to become estab- lished under the provisions of the zoning by-law instead of by regular procedure under the statutes . The general conclusion was that while the con- stitutionality of the set-back provisions of the zoning laws had not been absolutely established by trial cases, sufficient support had been given by courts to justify a policy of relying upon them. It was felt that the labor involved in formal proceedings for establishment of building lines by release and petition was likely to produce more opposition and more damage claims than if the procedure went forward in individual cases under the zoning law and building permit issuance . Mr. Emery asked the Selectmen to take steps to stop the placing of signs and advertising on posts, trees and fences on the public highway, and to secure the removal of such signs . He also asked that measures be taken to maintain the grass plots between sidewalks and streets, and to require public service companies and others disturbing this parking for placement of poles, pipes, etc . to restore it. PLANNING BOARD MEETING, LEXINGTON, MASS. Town Nall, October 26, 1926 . Present: Emery, Chairman. Worthen, Duffy, Glynn, Silne . Discussion of the situation as regards the engineer- ing department of the town. Need for town plan and topographi- cal work as basis for all development plans and studies . List of plans desired by the Board to be given to ,ir.Cosgrove and the Selectmen. Outline of progress on Shurtleff scheme for park and street developments in the Vine Brook areas . :Jr. Emery to arrange for conference of Board with Shurtleff before plan was fixed. Discussion of procedure and method of presentation of the scheme to the Town. Discussion of through traffic provisions and correlation of needed streets with the Shurtleff park development streets . The letter containing 1r. Duffy' s memo of streets which should be laid out by the County Commissioners, given to the Selectmen. Discussion of the merits of new street south from centre to Concord Avenue and 'Waverly. Mention of the need for layout of Grant Street, and its improvement. Discussion of needs of study and scheme for Valley Road and Smith property development at North Lexington. W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. LEXINGTON, MASS. November 4, 1926 . Present: Mr. Worthen, Messrs . Glynn, Duffy and Milne . Also Mr. Charles Ryder and Mr. Cosgrove. The meeting was devoted to a discussion of Mr. Shurtleff' s sketch plan of street and park system. Suggestions were made and Mr . Duffy was asked to review them with Mr . Shurtleff. W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. T3 xINGTON, MASS. November 18, 1926 . Present: Chairman Emery, Messrs . Duffy and Milne . Also Mr. Cosgrove . There was discussion of plans for building lines on the three lower Business Zones on Massachusetts Avenue. There was discussion of Mr. ShurtleffT s new submission, and Mr. Duffy presented an alternative scheme for the arrangement of the principal through-way which was favorably looked upon. Mr. Emery was to take it up with Mr. Shurtleff and also try to get more thought from him and more action. Adjourned 11 P.M. W.D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. Lexington, Mass . Thursday, December 2 , 1926 . Present: 2. L. Emery, Chairman. Messrs . Worthen, Duffy, Glynn, Milne, Engineer Cosgrove . Er. Worthen presented a map showing location of houses in the vicinity of Grapevine Corner, and told of his studies in regard to school house site in that district . He Particularly recommended a site on Allen Street opposite Blossom Street. After discussion this location appeared to be proper and the members were asked to view it. Mr. Cosgrove presented plans of lower Mass . Ave . showing suggested widening or building lines . After discussion, Mr. Cosgrove was asked to give plan and cross sections up to the junction of Pleasant Street in order that the particularly difficult condition at Oak Street might be studied. There was a discussion of the engineering needs of the Town and the Clerk was asked to formulate a letter to the Selectmen suggesting the employment of a competent engineer and the establishment of an effective engineering department. Adjourned 11.20 P.M. E. D. Milne, Clerk. 1111JL ) P..L7.60 isto*c-,ber 17, 1X6. Nesent: 'oJlr „ rafgl 11.10, .0 11c:er t.vosmove, engineert pis for lower °venue were a. An reviewaLd 1.t was decided tL=A; .;.21 aotmAl estim..te ,xr east fst4ening SO both u:!A.11.Jt all on north or suet aIdo was dosirsole. %ft‘. Goagrove wta aal:od to Itr. thin out. 'ist'..er to _olectneu ir, r, to e,,t-Ineeri - dert-lent 343 rea.1 .Lnd ordered sent. P. hurtleffes pl ,n 7U3 furter eA.41Ine ' anu". aeri.t bao1/4 futl!pr away iit oertAn ' Iory outlined )1.T.ra of o ,Ars re .tire to develoyac,rt i 7.'er 9L ra. . olook flour 7rwu 1,441 - A-totticx7 of 0-sx!LIn ,Iton rttaitiv. to estuoliehing 'ourese ror.e &t 1Lasuicu3etts venue wia reweved, dlaoussol and .1.01.1c .eas ordered to due notice of hearing. (JanuAry 14) . . . 111 December 27, 1926 . F. L. T mery, ;sq, , 50 Congress Street, Boston, lass . Dear .Ar: The Planning Board has considered the following matters during the year 1926: School house site . Drainage Act. Suver assessment provisions . Veterans' Hospital , Parking arrangements. Trebino Development, Utica Street. 'passachusetts Ave . at Oak St. curve reduction. Extension of Business 'Lone at Y,altham Street and Vine Brook Ltoad, Schofield & Boss, (dropped) . Vine Brook drainage and betterment assessments . Business Lone, Lowell & North' s . Hearing, etc. Swan Development. (Vine St. & Mayes Lane) . Fast St. Improvement and new road from Adams St, to Nort , Hancock Street. Massachusetts :.ve. set-back releases, ' oburn Street to TownHa.11. Through Traffic Highway development. Establishment of numerous street lines by county commissioners ,asked of Selectmen. Pilling Stations, general attitude toward, Filling atations, Grapevine Corner,Capper land. ". 1'. Gorman development, Lexington Park. Hinchey rioad, Eorth Lexington. 2 F. T. Emery, Esq. .;Ieady & Gorman land, need . edford :,troets . Business lone, Mass . Ave. ilarret atreet, Petition and Hearing. Bacon Property, Maple LAreet. Shurtleff Park plans, streets, drainage, and Ryder development. Engineering facilities . Bill Boards . ies toration of grass plots,etc . by public utilities disturbing same for construction. Building Lines, :'assachusetts Ave „ East Lexington. Business Z.one, 115 'Tassachusetts Avenue , petition of Justin Shea. Very truly yours, Clerk. Report of the Planning Board for the Year 1926 . As in previous years , the Planning Board has met two or three times a month throughout all but the midsummer months, and has been called up- on to consider the usual variety of problems. The Board has been ser- iously handicapped in its work by lack of engineering assistance . Un- less this assistance can be furnished, the Planning Board will be un- able to protect the Town as it should be protected against ill consider- ed and destructive development . In the opinion of the Board, the Town should provide an engineering force of not less than six men, a thoroughly experienced engineer whose experience and judgment would command a salary of from four• to five thousand dollars a year, one competent to consider the various problems in a large way and to suggest plans for solving them, a second competent engineer and at least four men capable of doing field work and drafting. Such a force would be capable of furnishing all engineering data requir- ed by the Town properly to control its development in various directions, and at a much lower cost than will result if we are to go outside to pri- vate firms, as will otherwise inevitably be necessary. Any money spent on engineering during the next ten or fifteen years will, in the opinion of the Board, be more than made up to the Town dur- ing the same period and in the years following. In our report for the year 1925 it was stated that the Board felt the Town to be insufficiently protected in the matter of provisions governing acceptance of streets, and stated its purpose to propose an amendment to the by-laws to meet the situation. Such an amendment to the by-laws was proposed to the Town at the March meeting, but was lost . We are glad to say, however, that the Selectmen subsequently adopted a set of rules defining the requirements and rules of procedure for accept- ance of streets which, to a large degree , provides what was sought to be had by an amendment to the by-laws. -2- Considerable 2- Considerable attention has been given to the matter of a selection of site for additional school buildings, in pursuance of request from the :selectmen, and the Board is about ready to make definite recommenda- tions with respect thereto . The bills for amending the Drainage Act and to correct the method of assessing; costs for sewer extensions, referred to in our 1925 report , both became laws during the year 1926, much of the time of the Planning Board being required in assisting the framing of the bills to meet the requirements of the Legislature and in securing the passage of the same . The Town has already benefited to the extent of many thousands of dollars as the result of the new method of sewer assessments. In connection with the drainage of the lower areas and particularly those to the south of Massachusetts Avenue drained by Vine Brook, a res- ponsible firm of private engineers have been engaged to make necessary surveys and to present a preliminary report presenting tentative plans for draining the lowlands and, to that end, deepening Vine Brook where it passes under Massachusetts Avenue and the railroad, and to furnish preliminary plans and estimates of cost which, it is hoped, will be laid before the Town during the spring or summer of 1927 for definite action by the Town. Mr. A. A. bhurtleff, landscape architect, is cooperating with the engineers, and it is hoped that, simultaneously with the en- gineers ' report upon the drainage, there may be presented to the Town a comprehensive plan for improving the lowlands, particularly in the park area, which, if adopted, will make certain that any fillings or roadways done or built hereafter shall be in pursuance of definite plans, so that no money will be wasted. The amendment to the Drainage Law above re- ferred to, provides for assessment of betterments to cover the cost of this drainage and improvement work, if and when the same is carried out . The planning Board obtained the necessary releases to make possible -3- the establishment of a building line from and including the Town Hall lot to 2letcher Avenue on the northerly side of Massachusetts Avenue, whereby the Town is protected against new building construction that would ada to the cost of widening the avenue to a full hundred feet, should it ever be deemed necessary to have the avenue so widened. The Planning Board is now at work upon the establishment of further building lines in the business zones on Massachusetts avenue, with a like end in view. Among the other matters considered by the Board, usually upon pe- tition of interested property owners, are the following: What is known as the Trebino development on Utica Street, definite recommendation made ; proposed extension of business zone on Waltham Street near Vine Brook Road, adversely reported and dropped; business zone at Lowell and North Streets, upon which hearing was granted, favorably recommended aru passed by the Town; what is known as the Swan development at Vine Street and Hayes Lane , still under consideration; East ztreet improvement and new road from Adams Street to North Hancock Street, the latter definitely recommended and in process of construction; the matter of additional filling stations at Grape Vine Corner on the Capper property, suggestions submitted; W. P. Gorman development , Lexington Park, still under consid- eration; Hinchey Road, North Lexington; Meady and Gorman land at Reed and Bedford Streets, still under consideration; business zone at Massachusetts Avenue and Marrett Street , hearing granted and adversely recommended; Bacon property, Maple Street, still under consideration; and business zone at 115 Massachusetts Avenue upon petition of Justin Shea, hearing granted and adversely recommended. The important subject of through traffic highway development is still held up for want of adequate engineering data, and must be held up until such data is obtained, and this notwithstanding it is one of the -4- .- most 4-most important features for the Town to consider for control of future developments . The Board has recommended to the Selectmen the establishment by the County Commissioners of numerous street lines, all for protection of the Town and individual property owners in connection with further building on those streets. The administration of the Zoning By-Law is definitely placed in the hands of the Building Inspector, and requires careful consideration of a competent and a broad-gauge man. The necessary man and time cannot be had for the small sum -- less than one thousand dollars, now paid for Building Inspector. In our opinion, two thousand dollars should be ap- propriated for the purpose. It is recommended that the scale of fees charged for building permits be raised, so as to make possible the pay- ment of the sum here recommended, otherwise the full benefits of the Zon- ing Law will not be obtained. This report is closed, as it was begun, with an earnest plea to the Town to appropriate the necessary sum for an adequate engineering force, in order that the Town's development may be made to fit the requirements of the Town rather than to modify the Town's requirements to fit the hap- hazard development by individuals . Respectfully submitted, 1927 PLANNING BOARD Frederick L. Emery J. Henry Duffy C. Edward Glynn William D. Milne Arthur W. Freeman Clarence H. Cutler M Y TT M January 10, 1927. .T,.. eery, Chairman, "iessrs . Duffy and Milne appeared before the selectmen to support and explain the views of the Planning board in regard to the matter of engineering facilities for the Town. Y . D. `lilne, Clerk, HEARING. January 14, 1927 . After due notice published in the Lexington Times and sent to some 33 individuals , a well attended hearing under the petition of Justus Shea for amendment of the zoning by-law to establish a business district at 115 Massachusetts Avenuw was held at the Town Offices at 8 P.M. , Friday, January 14, 1927 . Messrs . Emery, Duffy and Milne of the Planning Board were present. Mr. R. L. Ryder represented Mr. Shea in favor of the petition, and made the usual claims of benefits to the town. It appeared that Shea bought the front land in 1922, and the back land in 1924 and proposed to build a garage, 50 feet back from the Avenue, and use the back land as an oil depot with side track facilities . Mr. Wm. Murphy favored the petition. Mr. Leo Brean of the American Oil Co. of Cambridge spoke for Shea in regard to the oil business and facilities to be provided. Miss Mitchell favored the petition. Of those who were opposed to the petition, the following spoke : H. L. Coolidge, Mrs . Peavey, Mr.Perkins , Mr. Cummings , Mr. Hanson, Mr . Marshall, Mr. Joy, Mr. H.S.O. Nichols, Mr . Davin, On a call for hands of others than those who spoke, 27 were counted in opposition, and one in favor of the petition. No vote of the Planning Board was taken in the matter at the meeting, but there was strong evidence of the objection of the residents of the vicinity to the granting of the petition. W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. TFXINGTON, MASS. January 27, 1927 . Present: Mr . Emery, Chairman. Messrs . Worthen, Glynn, Duffy, Milne . Mr. Worthen presented plans for Robbins & Smith for a development off Locust St . and Pollen Road. More complete information as to topography and contiguous areas was asked of Robbins & Smith in collaboration with the town engineer. The constituency of the Board for 1927 was discussed at length. The matter of building line on Massachusetts Avenue from Town Hall to Hancock Street railroad crossing was discussed and the clerk was directed to inquire of the Selectmen as to their sentiments in the matter. The matter of building line on Massachusetts Avenue at East Lexington, particularly at the Robbins Cemetery was discussed. Mr. Worthen was asked to inquire of Miss Ellen Stone as to the ownership of the cemetery. Mr. Cosgrove reported that there were inter- ments within 12 feet of the present street line . On the petition of Justin Shea for amendment of the zoning by-law to create a business district at 115 Massachusetts Ave . (Fast* Lexington and rear, the Board unanimously voted not to recommend such a change to the Town. Adjourned 11 P.M. W. D. Milne, Clerk. For The Planning Board. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass. February 15, 1927. Present: .Emery, Chairman. Messrs . Worthen, Duffy, Glynn, Freeman, Milne . The Board met Robbins and Smith and their engineer, Peters, on plans for development off Locust Avenue . The layout called for street with 15% grade, which was objectionable . Various suggestions were made, and the matter was left to Mr. Peters and Mr. Cosgrove to study in an effort to find a more favorable street location. Mr. Emery showed plan of the Arlington Gas Light Company for gas holder they wish to place off Woburn Street. The general necessity for the holder and possible location for it, were discussed. The matter was left for Mr. Emery to consult with Mr. A.B. Tenney. The legal status of the Robbins Cemetery was to be referred to the Town Council. Mr. Duffy offered a proposed vote covering the appointment of a committee to examine the several functions of the town government and proposed methods and arrangements by which economy and effectiveness could be improved. The Board met with the selectmen and discussed the matter of establishing a building line on Mass . Ave . through the center. No encouragement was received. The matter of building inspection was touched on. Adjourned 11 P.M. W. D. Milne, Clerk. Note: Messrs . Duffy,Glynn and Milne met with the Finance Committee on February 14, 1927 and offered the views of the Board on the matter of appropriations for the Engineer' s Department . W.D.M. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. Town Hall . Lexington, February 25,1927. Present: Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Worthen, Glynn. Robbins & Smith plans for development off Locust Street, which had been revised by the engineers were discusses , some further improve- ments being suggested. In general the plan appeared to be approaching satisfactory shape . Roger Ingalls was called and the plan for the Meady-Gorman-Ingalls tract was reviewed. Mr. Emery reviewed progress on the drainage and park plans . W. D. Milne, Clerk . PLANNING BOARD MEETING. Lexington Town Hall. March 7, 1927. Present: Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Glynn, Cutler, Milne . Mr. 0 . G. Gorman was present and stated his views in regard to the development of the Meady-Gorman- Ingalls tracts on Reed and Bedford Streets. He wished no change in the status of his property. After general discussion it was left that a plan might be sent to each of these owners showing how a layout might best be made, but with the feeling that if none were made there was little danger of unfavorable development . The matter of procedure in Board of Survey matters was discussed and it was agreed that in every case formal petition should be required and invitation of the Board of Survey recorded before developer' s plans were studied . The matter of procedure in town meeting in regard to appropriation for the Engineering Department was discussed, without definite plan for action being fixed. The matter of a committee for an inquiry into the broad phases of town administrative policies and economies was discussed and it was decided to approach the Selectmen before presenting any motion in regard to it to the town meeting. W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. LEXINGTON, MASS. March 18, 1927 . Present: Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Glynn, Cutter, Milne . The committee was organized, Mr. Emery, selected Chairman, i,M.r. Milne , Clerk. There was discussion of Mr. Duffy' s proposed vote for an advisory committee on general Town Policies . It was referred back to Messrs . Duffy and Milne with suggestions . The situation with respect to relations with the selectmen was discussed and reference was made to the status of the Robbins and Smith, and McPhee development plans . It was decided not to attend the hearings on these petitions, but Mr. Emery was left to inform Yr. Ballard of the Planning Board' s position. Adjourned at 11 P.M. until Friday March 25,1927 . W. D. Milne , Clerk. 3 N1':I,T r 177T117-1. ''arch 21, /527, t'essrs . "mery, int:ffy and A.lne met with P les of `7etcalf '"ddy at the office r, :.;hurtlefr and discussed plans of the Vine Brook drainape and sevelopment project. The field work h:-ving been completed a definite pro- cedure was agreed upon and the engineers were to prepare the data for fin:-.1 revision. The question as to the sewerage facilities for the lo:. ,- rea browht up by `,r. Duffy, and T!r. Fales vies left to check this up. line , Clerk, PLANNING BOARD MEETING LEXINGTON, MASS. April 9, 1927 . Present: Mr . Emery, Chairman. Messrs . Glynn, Duffy, Gutter, Milne . Mr. Custance of the Selectmen was present through most of the meeting as was Mr . Cosgrove, Engineer. Mr. Custance discussed with the Board the ways and means for the coordination of the Board of Survey and Planning Board. It was agreed to prepare forms for petitions and routing of these to the Board, etc. , this being left for Messrs . Duffy and Milne to work on with Mr. Chamberlain of the Selectmen. The matter of permits issued for new building on Massachusetts Avenue, East Lexington, within the 30 ft. building line being worked on by the Board was discussed. The Board was surprised that the Selectmen should have taken action in this matter without con- sulting or advising the Planning Board. The Board of Survey referred petitions of Robbins & Smith, Swan, and Perkins to the Planning Board for review and report. The matter of the Robbins and Smith procedure was discussed with Mr. Custance . The Shurtleff plan for street development in the Vine Brook Drainage area was shown and briefly discussed by the Board and Mr. Custance . Adjourned 11 .30 to Friday April 15, 1927 . W. D. Milne, Clerk. ..ezin€tcan, "ass. April 15, 1927*. resent: "r. ' it ry 41airman.air . ''"essra. Ilynno Cutler, 3ilne. lso ._, Cosgrove, rieneeri and ar, ialumberlain of the card of arleotsen. The bobbins P .t development was reviewed with Mr* t c bbians• und plans to € vo¢d excessive street grades were urged, It was armed to ret in tch with the Tower land r res+entative with a view to establishing a road on the bountry line to the benefit of both parcels* • %obbtns agreed to at once undertake to lay out a lotting; plan embodyin6 thp amoral ;rthoiples desired by the , oe:rd. The orkins Manor dswelont was disouased, It was shown to :fro Chamberlain that an intelligent reeommendation could not be %ode for this development without a plan of the very large area behind this property shoeing ot'hcz, developmsnts, some t .. aphy, etc. Cosgrove was given an outline of. +to required. 11 There was discussion with Jr* Cheaberlain of the need for review of sewer picas with mat oar* before T000ediri ; on construction, even that construotton in ' ast _:oacin of nowcontracted fam are was seussicct of t} action n o. the selectmen in regard to street lines on ' .blesao7`rucetts ;venue, `'aut Lexington* .4.djourned 11.15 "lines CleA!. I z aeztrijton, ass. =il 19, l:h7. ,resent r. :j, kihair—n. '`lsers. Minn, fMftt, tine and 'n sneer +;osgrov . he 21-n of the Atobbins & ;with dcvelonnent prepared by collaboration of the Torn Lngineer and Aobbins and r.,mith was reviewed and recd gsndad for approv :3 with certain minor suggestions. (aee letter of pri i 20, 19.'7 to the. o.:..rfi of ',urvey) . The clerk was instructed to t nforia the board of -urvey formally as to the statue of the t cr*ina petition, the Ilanning liaard being unable to proceed without engineering data. (:.;ee letter of 'pril 20,19 7) . `'fir. Duffy presented criticisms of the :.)hurtleff ark and etrec t cevelopnent plain and agreed to review these with "!r. Ahurt1eff. i.djourned 5.30 -linos Clerk. PLANNING BO htRD MEETING. April 29 , 1927 . Present: P. L. Emery, Chairman, Messrs . Duffy, Glynn, Cutler, Lilne, Engineer Cosgrove, and Engineer Raymond from Metcalf and Eddy. The :;ieeting was devoted to a further review and revision of the Shurtleff sketch of roads in the Vine Brook Drainage area, with the advice and assistance of the engineer. Mr. Charles and h. L. Ryder reviewed the plans and only offered the thought that the dray nage at Massachusetts Avenue be materially lowered beyond the engineer' s plan. It was asked that the engineer consider this sug,•'estion with a view to showing conclusively that it was or was not good economy. Otherwise, the Ryders were favorable to all features . Meeting adjourned at 12 .01 A.M. to Tuesday May 3, 1927. 4 W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BO.:RD ',EYTII G. Lexington, ':?ass . May 3, 1927, Present: Full Board and =7r. Raymond for Metcalf and Eddy. This was a joint meeting with the Selectmen at which the ::hole Vine Brook Drainage and Park de- velopment project was explained and discussed. : r. Ballard asked for a report from the engineer outlying the project and the physical features, limiting the design as developed by the engineer's study and survey. This was promised, Meeting adjourned at 11 ?.:^ . 1ilne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. Lexington, Mass . May 17, 1927. Present: Messrs . Emery, Glynn, Duffy, Cutler, Costrove,Milne . The matter of house location for Bridget Leary off Cottage Street for which the selectmen had refused permit pending review of possible street development in this area was discussed. It appeared that the widening of Cottage Street and its extension through the Leary site was not entirely feasible or necessary. A sketch was prepared showing possible development of the streets in the vicinity and it was felt that Mrs . Leary might proceed as she had planned without endangering the locality. Mr. Scofield renewed the plea for extension of the business zone on Vine Brook Road back from Waltham Street to the back of the lot and presented plans of a 3 story brick 24 apartment house to cost 0.90,000. After hearing, Mr. Scofield and his architect, the Board took up the general matter of apartment house development in connection with this project and that of W. j . S. Eaton and Lexington Trust Company for 2 apartment house between Clarke and Muzzey Streets . The weight of sentiment of the Board appeared to be opposed to encouraging in any way the apartment house type of development anywhere outside of existing established business areas, although there was some feeling that the apartment house might be more favorable to certain localities than the one story stores that might otherwise result . The Clarke-Muzzey development was left for Mr. Emery to talk over with Mr. Eaton in the light of the Board' s discussion. Mr. Custance brought in a partial plan of Locust Street extension and the Robbins & Smith development, approval of the entrances from Locust St. being asked. This approval was deemed in order if the Board of Survey records were complete . The meeting adjourned at 11.30 P.M. to Friday May 20, 1927 . W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING May 20, 1927 Present : - Messrs. Emery, Glynn, Duffy, Cutler and Cosgrove . C . H. Cutler acting clerk. The following matters were voted: - Swan Development The Planning Board on May 20, 1927, considered the Swan development and referred the plans for further study in particular reference to the treatment of the extreme high tracts of the area. Perkins Lanor Development The Planning Board voted May 20, 1927 to submit the plan for this development prepared by Engineer Cosgrove to the Board of Selectmen and with the Board of Selectmen to seek the agreement of the owners of adjacent property in the working out of this plan. Griswold Petition The Planning Board voted November 20, 1927 in the matter of the Griswold petition, to request that the Town Engineer be requested to confer with Mr. Griswold ' s engineer and present at the next meeting of the Planning board, a plan, and data, showing the state of the present Griswold development in the vicinity, together with the section covered by the present petition, laid out in connection therewith. Further, that Mr. Gridwold be present with his engineer at said next meeting. Cottage St. leary Permit The Planning Board voted to recommend that Mrs. Leary be permitted to proceed with the cellar which she has already begun, it being inexpedient , in the opinion of the Board, to extend Cottage Street through the Leary property parallel to 'Woburn Street. (Note : The Planning Board felt that if complete data were in hand it would be feasible to arrange for extension of Cottage Street and lay out other streets for the favorable development of this general locality without disturbing the Leary property. W.D .M. ) . Schofield Request for Change in Zoning By-Law, area on Vine Brook The Planning Board voted that it would not on its own iniative recommend the modification of the Zoning Plan to accommodate the proposed apartment at the corner of altham Street and Vine Brook Road referred to in the communication of Charles H. Schofield, but that said Schofield be advised that if he desires to press his petition, he proceed in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 24 of the Zoning Law, and then should he desire to so proceed, (the Board) considers the "property affected" to comprise both sides of -2- Waltham iam St�eeet fromi;`assachusetts Avenue to Forest Street an oth sides of ine Brook Road from ' altham Street to inthrop Road . PLANNING BOARD MEETING. Monday, June 6, 1927. Present: Mr. Emery, Chairman. Messrs . Duffy, Cutler (part) , Milne . Engineer Cosgrove . Mr. Griswold appeared at request in connection with his development plans, asking approval of an old plan which had previously been discussed and found un- suitable . He was charged with non-cooperation with the Board and urged to change his attitude. Old plans for a suitable road arrangement were brought out, and he finally agreed to work further with the town engineer and those to whom lots in a certain area had been sold, with a view to arranging by readjustment of lots if necessary to secure more favorable street arrangements . The matter was left for conference between Town Engineer and Griswold' s engineer . The Engineer's plan for Perkins Manor and adjacent street development was explained to Howard Nichols , Miss Jacobs, Mr. and Mrs . Perkins , and Mrs . Brander, owners of adjacent property. All were favorable to the genral scheme and ready to make the necessary exchanges and adjustments if fair proposals were made . Mr . Rowe representing Perkins was present and agreeable . The matter was left for the Engineer and Perkins to work out the details for the formal petition, etc. There was discussion of the Swan development and Messrs . Duffy and Milne were left to view the property and make a final recommendation. Adjourned at 11.10 P.M. W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANN:CNG BOARD MEETING. Lexington, Mass . June 24, 1927 . Present: Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Glynn, Cutler and Milne of the Board. Mr. Chamberlain of the Selectmen and Engineer Cosgrive . A letter from the Selectmen asking views of the Doard on granting renewal of permits for bill boards of the Lexington Lumber Company on Marrett Street and Massachusetts Avenue was read, and it was voted to recommend that the permits be not granted. The recent activities of the Board were reviewed with Mr. Chamberlain. Mr. Emery reminded Mr. Chamberlain that the Board was now waiting on the Selectmen in the Vine Brook Drainage matter . Mr . Chamberlain reported in regard to the Robbins cemetery that the title searcher stated it would be a long and expensive task to run down all the records and even then conclusive proof as to the title being vested in the town or private interests would be lacking. The general sentiment was that it would be proper to proceed to lay down a building line on either side of the cemetery, and leave the final settlement to such time as it might be necessary to widen the avenue . Adjourned 10 .30 t'.M. W.�!. D. Milne, Clerk. oxin8ton* x-s_s• ;rid-tra e:steribcr 1:, 10f.."/• 'resent: • „ coJr.z..i• lv* 711Pnus t1.7.0 'ZOO oacToire• The c,),,pliciatian of 434, leo * relAtive to ii.ormor .;aoon land at Ass. venue etm, treat was revtewsc.-.. ;Ise engineer's sketch pl.in 0.' new armnip. cant of streets :vat; lots ,Ins resented to -Ia. i5ickerson* who WAS left to endeavor to coeure the agreement eeveral •-`koldere in this tract to t/o necessary exallenge of land so that the scheme ii ht Lc realised. 40 application of r• ..ithIn for layout of eterbee ark -00(Wor4 ...tweet was reviewed 4ams1 sumestions as to t offered, The petitioners were to iork out a further schwa in accordance with tbs suggestions tnd reastuAlit at next rseetirs;;• ?he oloctarnic letter to ro.yuod to the adlelet petition for Arnim:43n for too f oectiossro7 at G 1 gasacnusetts venue was rondo %Id utter discussion the , zorz,,C1 voted un.:.nirtously in ortnuition to 3uott !Ice* ort.-ressl,v Ls opinion 1.,-,ut it ii o pre3uilloir-1 to tl-e future of the large undovolo xh.; yes in the vielnity• The Natter° t uif tiee ouol.ness* finc.. or election of a member to fill -vec lncy oda:m(4 r• reericrios resignation* wore discussed* tottcr from • 2artm.n. tate .-oncultant, offoring to confer and ad;ize wi th the lenning ret‘Ct Jona tl'e clerk was instructed to qrtte to re. ' ort,x11 inviting his treater** to so )c ctinAt his convenionoe• isttjourned 11 •Zi . • • • '• llneg Cierk• ?, PLANNING BOARD MIEETING. Lexington, Mass . September 24, 1927 . Present: Chairman Emery. Messrs . Glynn, Duffy, Cutler, "iilne, Engineer Cosgrove and State Consultant Hartman. The evening was spent chiefly in a discussion with Mir. Hartman on Planning Board and zoning matters in general, Mr. Hartman emphasizing the matter of appeals and the importance of observing technicalities with re- gard to hearings , notices, and returns . He encouraged enforcement of the by-law in every respect, suggesting the use of the police power by administrative order . The Selectmen again requested a statement from the Planning Board in the Wadleigh matter, stating that what was wanted was an expression of general policy in regard to such petitions rather than the particular policy in the Wadleigh case . After discussion, the clerk was asked to draft a letter presenting this policy. Adjourned 11 P.-;i. W. D. Milne, Clerk. I eLANN114G BvARD METING October 7, 1927 Present Messrs. Emery, Duffy, Glynn, Cutler & Milne Engineer Cosgrove in attendance. 1. There was discussion of the Bacon property, Maple St. , and Mr. Cosgrove reported that Mr. Nickerson was on the way to a control of the property which would enable the land to be developed in accordance with the suggested plan. 2. A letter to the selectmen in reply to their request for a statement of policy on variations or exceptions from the Zoning Law was formulated, and ordered sent. 3. Petition of F. P. Whalen for business district at Bowker St. and Mass. Ave. was received and discussed. Hearing was set for October 28, 1927. 4. There was discussion of the Vine Brook drainage and development scheme, and stimates from Mr. Raymond of Metcalf and Eddy were read. Mr. Duffy was asked to make an outline for a clarified statement of the various steps in the program and the estimated cost of each part. The clerk was asked to prepare a memorandum of the various projects or subjects reviewed by the Board for the next meeting. Adjourned 11.10 p.m. till Oct. 14. W. D. Milne, Clerk a° "° `the PLANNING BOARD TT aq, 14 34 Lexington, Mass October 18, 1927. Planning Board Meeting October 14, 1927 Present Messrs. Emery, Duffy, Glynn, Cutler, Milne - also by invitation Messrs. Cosgrove & Chamberlain. There was a review of projects studied in the past three years, to determine their present status. The feasibility of controlling developments on unapproved layouts by means of holding back building permits was discussed. The status of the Griswold development was discussed and the clerk was instructed to write Mr. Griswold for a report of progress and invite him to meet with the Board. Messrs. Cutler and Glynn were elected a sub-committee to carry on the investigation of the matter of a school house site in the south easterly section of the town. The clerk was instructed to write to the selectmen for an opportunity to be heard before they are committed in the matter of appropriation for the engineering department. Adjourned 11. 10 p.m. till Friday Oct. 21. W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Oct. 21, 1927 Present Messrs. Emery, Duffy, Glynn, Cutler & Milne also Mr. Raymond of Metcalf & Eddy & Mr. Cosgrove. The meeting was devoted to a discussion of the Vine Brook drainage project and the estimates of costs of the various stages of the program. The drift of sentiment seemed to be to confine the participation of the town to those features which would simply allow the development of this area. tiv . D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Oct. 28, 1927 Present Messrs. Emery, Cutler, Milne, Cosgrove. This meeting was a Hearing on the petition of F. P. Whalen to change to a business district the land at Bowker St. and Mass. Ave. , East Lexington. Some 28 persons attended, Mr. Burke appeared for the petitioner, the chief plea being for charity to a disabled veteran. It appeared that the change was sought chiefly in view of a filling station location. Those appearing in favor, speaking, were, Mr. Keating, Mr. Theodore Sheffers, Mr. K. Walcott , Mr. H. F. Wheipley, Mrs. Ella Sheffers, Mr. Angelo Lewando. Those speaking in opposition were Mr. Dcoley, Mr . Anthony Sylvester, Mr. Meilick, Mrs. Travers, Mr. C. A. Cummings, Mr. Stephen Dolan and Mr. John A. Kenego, also hands of five who did not speak were shown in opposition. The opposition was based on rights under the zoning by law, protecting people who had bought or built with this assurance. Mr. Curran was opposed to any filling station proposition but not opposed to store occupancy of this area. It appeared also that some signers of the petition had had its intent misrepresented and asked the withdrawal of their names, including C. S. Marsolais and Mr. Curran. (After the hearing several women informed the Board that Whalen was not incapacitated for work) . Mr. Whalen expressed indefinitely a willingness to forego the filling station if he could have a small store. The hearing was closed and meeting adjourned without a vote being taken by the Board. W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Nov. 11, 1927 Present Messrs.Emery,Cutler,Du£fy,Glynn, 4ilne & Engineer Cosgrove The Board received a letter from J. H. Devine, -Eng-ineer �✓ in behalf of Justin Shea, relative to business zone establishment at 119 Mass. Ave. but voted to inform Mr. Shea & Mr. Devine that the status of the matter did not appear to have changed since hearing was held Jan. 14, 1926 on the matter, and that the Board did not care to consider the matter further unless a new petition was presented (See letter to Mr. Devine) . There was discussion of the Engineers figures on the Vine Brook drainage project and of the general status of the matter. PLANNING BOARDEETING Nov. 25, 1927 Present Messrs.Emery, Duffy,Outler,Rilne - Engineer Cosgrove. Mr. Nickerson appeared relative to the Bacon property and expressed satisfaction with a new plan prepared by Town Engineer, but after discussion it was left with the Engineer to consult with Miss Tower' s engineer relative to park development adjacent west and to allow for extension of street to Maple St. parallel to R.R. and submit further plan. Mr. Griswold and his engineer Bellamy appeared and after lengthy discussion finally agreed to work out a comprehensive plan for the whole property and adjacent property particularly the Lexington Park property, with the town Engineer, and reach a definite conclusion as promptly as possible so that the whole matter might be closed. PLANNING BOA:iD MEETING. Lexington, Mass . December 10, 1927 . Present: Messrs . Emery, Glynn, Duffy, Cutler and Milne . A suggestion for a street at the easterly end of the Tower ark property was made after a discussion of possible street along railroad in this area was dis- cussed, in connection with the Bacon property develop- ment . The meeting was otherwise devoted to a dis- cussion of Mr. Emery' s proposed letter to the selectmen in regard to the engineering force . The clerk was asked to draft a new letter on the subject . Engineer' s plan for extension of Clark Street over part of the Glass property was approved. "1. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. December 20, 1927 . Present : Mr . Emery, Chairman. .Iessrs . Glynn, Milne, Duffy and Cosgrove . Mr . Chamberlain reviewed several matters pending with the selectmen, namely - building line on Mass. Ave . at Center St. , the Vine Brook Drainage project, the Town Engineering facilities , and Clark Street extension. Mr. Cosgrove was asked to furnish Mr . Shurtleff with a plan o the Bacon-Nickerson development and the street to be provided at the Tower Park property. The proposed letter to the selectmen in regard to engineering force was reviewed. D. Milne , Clerk. PLANNING BOARD REPORT FOR 1927 The Planning Board was conceived as an instrument by which this community might guide its development in such a manner as to preserve and enhance its economic and aesthetic values . Being an advisory board only, its success in such an endeavor is peculiarly dependent upon the understanding interest and the support of the citizens and their executive officers . The present acceleration of the growth of Lexington forces upon the Planning Board problems of large scope and the active support of the citizens is needed if the present community standards are to be protected and excessive future community costs avoided. Not only should the protection afforded by the zoning by-law be carefully preserved, but there should be provision made for comprehensive and constructive plans for the guidance of the future development . As a practical matter, the Town is at present to a con- siderable extent at the mercy of activities of out-of-town, speculative real estate developers. Their plans are drawn primarily to secure the maximum of saleable lots, and the streets are planned with little regard to contiguous areas, and with little respect to the costs of maintenance, drainage and public utilities which the town must later carry. Such plans receive the attention of the Board of Selectmen and the Planning Board, and every effort is made to secure such changes as will result in a plan and layout favorable to the interest of the town. ."while such efforts are often successful, some are not, and there are now several developments of a type inimical to best interests and economies of the town, due to lack of cooperation on the part of developers and tardiness of action looking to their control . The Planning Board believes that a comprehensive plan should be developed, fixing the location of new through streets and important ways which will establish a favorable basis for future development in large areas at present unimproved, and otherwise benefit the town. Also, that the need, suitability availability of lands for park, schoolhouse , and drainage pur- oses be studied and fixed upon. It foresees the inevitable development of the town as a populous suburb and is convinced that plans for the future must be on broad and generous, as well as on sound economic lines . All planning work, whether on the immediate demand of some real estate developer, or of a broader and more anticipatory character, is based upon engineering data as to topography, soil conditions, property lines, street locations, etc . A com- plete and accurate large scale map of the town incorporating this data is a present essential need. -2- The i'lanning Board has been unable to give to the broader matters of town planning the attention that these require , be- cause its time has to so large extent been taken up by engineer- ing details . For the proper handling of the problems of immedi- ate and local real estate development, as well as for the formu- lation of comprehensive future plans, there is need for a compe- tent ,adequate engineering force for the town. Such a force is properly an essential arm of the town managment, and the service it renders to the Planning Board is secondary and incidental. The relation of the Town 's provision for engineering ser- vice to present costs and future tax burdens for public improve- ments has been studied by the Planning board in much the same manner that study was given to the matter of assessment of costs of sewer construction, and recommendation has been made to the Selectmen. As indicative of the character of the projects received by the Board , and as a matter of record , the following principal items appearing in the past year' s work, are noted :- Hearing on petition of Justice Shea for amendment to zon- ing by-law to permit business district for garage and oil depot at 115 Massachusetts Avenue , East Lexington. Consideration of street and lot development for Robbins & Smith off Locust Avenue , East Lexington. Consideration of Building line for Massachusetts Avenue , East Lexington, and in center. Consideration of Meady land development, heed and Bedford Streets, North Lexington. Conference with landscape Architect Shurtleff with regard to park development in the playground district . Extended study of the drainage situation and future de- velopment in the vine Brook basin south of Massachusetts Avenue . Study in regard to Cottage Street . Conferences in regard to suggested extension of business zone to permit apartments in two areas near the center . Study of development for J. P. Swan off woburn Street . Study for development of so-called Perkins Manor, off Massachusetts Avenue , East Lexington. Studies in regard to Griswold and Lexington Park Develop- ments, North Lexington. Consideration of policy in regard to billboards and on specific cases. Study for development of J. A . Nickerson off Maple Street, East Lexington. Study of development, '`detherbee Park, North Lexington. Hearing on petition of i''. P . Vihalen for amendment of zon- ing by-law to establish a business district at Massachusetts %venue , and Bowker Street, East Lexington. Studies for through streets to relieve Massachusetts -2- Avenue traffic . Respectfully submitted, William D. Milne , Clerk Frederick L. Emery, Chairman C . Edward Glynn, J. Henry Luffy, Clarence H. Cutler. 1928 PLANNING BOARD Frederick L. Emery J. Henry Duffy C. Edward Glynn William D. Milne Clarence H. Cutler Harry A. Wheeler PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass . January 3, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Cutler, Glynn and Milne. This was a joint meeting with the Board of Selectmen at the latter' s request . The present status of the work on the plans for the drainage and development of the Vine Brook areas south and west of the Centre was discussed and explained. The planning Board asked for an appropriation of $1500 to enable the engineers, Metcalf and Eddy,to complete their work on the project and to make a final engineering report in regard to it. The selectmen appeared to be agreeable to this appropria- tion and the matter was left in their hands . The views of the Planning Board with respect to the needs of the town and its boards for engineering service 111 were presented and the matter was discussed at some length in the presence of Messrs . Scammon and Cosgrove . The Board endeavored to convince the selectmen that there was need for a more generous provision and a definite policy in regard to the engineering de- partment along lines set forth in letter previously addressed to the selectmen. W. D. Milne , Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. Lexington, Mass . Janu- ry 10, 1928. Present : Messrs . Emery, Cutler, Duffy and Milne, also Engineer Cosgrove . There was a discussion of the status of the Lexington Park development resulting from an inquiry from the engineer respecting the present owners and that property as to the status of the lay-out of streets . It was found that the action taken by Griswold on the adjoining development had prejudiced the street location plan for the Lexington Park area, and it would be necessary to work out some scheme to harmonize these two developments . Mr . Griswold was asked to bring Mr. Bellamy, the engineer for Griswold, together with Branch, the engineer for the Lexington Park development and to scheme out a reasonable arrangement . Mr. Cosgrove exhibited sketch plan for a possible service street paralleling the railroad in the rear of the present town hall lot . He stated that these plans were prepared at the suggestion of the present owners of the town hall and adjacent properties and had not been reviewed by them. It is said that no information has been given by these parties as to their proposed development in this area. He was advised to get in touch with these parties and to secure from them a definite statement as to what they propose before spending his time in laying out possible schemes . The matter of a possible candidate for the vacancy on the Board left by Mr . r`reeman was discussed, but no action was taken other than to suggest that Mr . ' orthen be urged to resume his service with the Board. W . D. Milne, Clerk . PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass . February 6, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Glynn, Duffy, Cutler, Cosgrove and Milne . Mr. Neil McIntosh appeared with his Engineer Frost and plan for development of the Davis property on Bedford St . , the matter having been referred by the Selectmen to the Planning Board. After brief discussion Mr. Cosgrove was asked to prepare plan and topography of the entire area, Mr. Frost agreeing to furnish profiles of the brooks . Promise was made for prompt action as soon as the data was available . Captain Breed appeared to consult with the Board in regard to Kitson designed memorial for Hastings Park and seemed to desire the active support of the Board for the plan. It was voted to advise the Selectmen that the plan was acceptable in so far as it affected present or proposed streets, but to call attention to need for new provisions for drainage in the area if the memorial was built. There was discussion of the service street between Massachusetts Avenue and Railroad and Mr.Cosgrove was asked to prepare two sketch plans for basis of discussion with Seligman and others . There was brief discussion of Kirkegaarde scheme for street off Kendall and Middle Streets, but this matter had not been referred to the Board by the Selectmen. W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOA1D MEETING. Lexington, Mass . February 21, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Glynn, Cosgrove and Milne . The McIntosh Plan for development of the Davis property on Bedford Street was reviewed, the engineer having prepared a topographic plan of this tract. The McIntosh plan called for streets through the area per- pendicular to Bedford Street and 210 feet apart. The thought was expressed that frequency of intersections was undesirable and that it might be advisable to continue the general arrangement of streets as in the Lexington Manor area so that the main-ways would be parallel with Bedford Street. A tentative sketch plan was drawn so that this matter might be discussed. Mr . McIntosh and his engineer then appeared and Mr. McIntosh presented his reasons for opposing this scheme for streets parallel with Bedford Street . These reasons appear to be largely connected with. the ready salability of the lots . After discussion, it was pointed out that no well-defined plan had been prepared to show how the street system in the new area would be matched up with that in the Lexington Manor development, and it was accordingly voted to give the engineer an opportunity to prepare two plans for the street development of the entire area,- one based principally upon the original suggestion submitted by Mr . McIntosh. After discussion of the street proposed by Mr . Kirkbright parallel with Kendall Road off Middle Street, the Board voted in favor of the approval of such a plan if Mr . Kirkbright could secure the land and the agreement of owners of adjacent land through which the street would be projected. The meeting adjourned until February 28th. W. D. Milne , Chairman. 11 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. Lexington,Mass . March 19, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Glynn, Cosgrove and Milne . Absent: Mr . Cutler and Mr . ',Iheeler, new member . The new Board was organized with Mr. 7mery Chairman, and 'V. D. Milne, Clerk. The meeting was devoted to a review of matters pending and a discussion of work to be done . Mr. Cosgrove was asked to ascertain from the owners the status of the matters affecting the Bacon property. Mr . Cosgrove was asked to prepare data for revies of the situation as regards the building line on Mass . Avenue, East Lexington. Mr . Emery agreed to ascertain the action to be taken with regard to the appropriation for the completion of the engineer ' s report on the Vine Brook drainage project. It would seem essential that topography and other survey data be collected with respect to the area bounded by the Arlington line, Massachusetts Avenue, Maple and Lowell Streets . It was also pointed out that the completion of a street scheme on the higher land south of Massachusetts Avenue, East Lexington near the Nichols Estate be secured. The necessity for new lay-out affecting Grove Street was mentioned. W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD Lexington, Mass . A meeting was held May 1, April 24 and April 17 . Mr . Hartman, State Consultant, was present on April 17 and May 1 and there was discussion of various details of the present zoning by-law, particular attention being given to the minimum permitted size of lot, size of front, rear and side yards , the control of buildings on rear lots not directly fronting on streets and the advisibility of requiring a hearing and permit from the Board of Survey for the erection of semi-public and institutional buildings in the single-house zone and the establish- ment of certain nuisance occupancies in the business districts . At the meeting on May 2, the suggestion was received from Mr. Custance relative to the changing of the Parker and Foster Street area to a single- family zone, this being viewed with favor . No definite action was taken at any of these meetings . '!. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass . May 8, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Cutler, Duffy, Cosgrove and Milne . There was a discussion of a building line below Massachusetts Avenue and it was voted to recommend the establishment of a building line thirty feet distant from the northerly and easterly side of the Avenue from the Arlington line to the curve near Oak St . =ith a building line corresponding with the street line on opposite side of the street. Mr . Emery agreed to notify the Selectmen of this action. Meeting May 15. Present: Messrs . Emery, Cutler, Glynn, Cosgrove, Wheeler and Milne . Mr . Hartman was present to discuss proposed changes in zoning by-law and submitted draft of new sections governing size of lots in residential sections and calling for condition precedent for certain types of occu' ancy in both business and residential districts not now so limited. No formal action was taken at the meeting. Mr . Hartman was left to further refine the wording of his proposed clauses . The meeting adjourned to Monday May 21. W . D. Milne, Clerk. LEXINGTON, MASS. Planning Board Public Hearing June 25, 1928. A public hearing was held at 8 M. in the new Town Office Building, Lexington, Mass . in regard to change in the zoning by-law to change the existing two-family house district involving Parker St . , Forest St . , Muzzey St . , etc . between the Playground park area, Waltham St . and Massachusetts Avenue, to a single-family house district . The hearing was called after public notice of fourteen days, as required by the zoning by-law, had appeared in the Lexington Times Minute Man and was inserted by Assistant Town Clerk, Mrs . ':Ihittemore , who has the record. The meeting was called to order at 8.20 P.M. by "I . D. Milne , presiding, and C . E . Glynn, acting as clerk. No other members of the Planning Board were present. Seven citizens were present . On a call for showing hands, four citizens expressed themselves as favoring the proposed amendment of the by-law and one was opposed. Mr . Greeley, Mr . Bailey and Mr . Mitchell all spoke in favor of the amendment . Mr . Ferguson had a slight objection to the change and stated that he would not be personally affected. Mr . Hunneman also favored the change as did Walter Ballard. The hearing closed at 8.50 P.M. after arrangement had been made for the presentation of a motion under the article warrant for the town meeting and an informal gathering of the citizens present . W. D. Milne, Clerk. 111 PLANNING BOARD MEETING LEXINGTON, MASS. July 17, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Cutler, Glynn, Duffy, Milne and Engineer Cosgrove . The plan of land controlled by the Star Realty Trust and presented by Mr. Rowland was con- sidered, but in view of the fact that this party anticipated a considerable extension of the tract under development, the matter was left for Town Engineer and the owner' s engineer to prepare complete plan and topography of the whole area and submit the plan at a later meeting. Mr . Rowland was asked to furnish copy of the trust agreement, financial statement,and prospectus of the Star Realty Trust of which Carl ;,F. Johansen, is President,and whose office is at 19 Milk St. , Boston. The Planning Board voted as being not in favor of the erection of a filling station at Fottler Avenue and Massachusetts Avenue, or at any other location in that vicinity, and indicated its preference for stores at this location. On plan of Mr. Lewis Hunt for a street between Massachusetts Avenue and Slocum Road, the Board voted to ask Mr. Hunt to submit a lotting plan of this area. W. D. ISI i l ne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING. Lexington,Mass . July 31, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Cutler, Milne and Cosgrove . The Board appeared before the Selectmen relative to the application of Prendergast Bros . for a filling station at corner of Fottler Avenue and 1..assachusetts Ave . , East Lexington. The sentiment was voiced that the Prendergast proposal to erect stores if the filling station permit was not granted was a threat . The Planning Board was generally opposed to the granting of filling station permit believing that the stores would not be erected. The promotors of the Star Realty Develop- ment near the Arlington line on Massachusetts Avenue presented nothing further and the Town Engineer had made little progress with them. The uncompleted business of the committee was reviewed and it was decided to push particularly the matter of building lines on Massachusetts Avenue, East Lexington. "I. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass . August 7 , 1928. Present: Messrs . _,mery, Duffy, iAlne and Cosgrove . Mr. Emery reviewed before the Selectmen a letter from the town counsel stating his views which were to the effect that the establishment of a building line on Massachusetts Avenue would result in damages equal to the value of the property between the building line and the street if damages resulted from litigation, and that the fixing of damages by prior agreement with the several parties would probably be good economy. Mr . Chamberlain of the Selectmen appeared and stated that the Selectmen had granted the permit to Prendergast Bros . for a filling station at corner of Fottler Avenue and Massachusetts Avenue with the privilege that all structures be thirty feet back from the sidewalk line and subject to release •on the part of Prendergast Bros . with respect to the area thirty feet back from the street in anticipation of the establishment of a building line . Mention was made of the application of the Rest Inn people for extension of their filling station plant on the opposite corner of F ottler Avenue . It was noted that this station is a non-conforming use in a residential district, but it is thought that it would be only fair to allow the extension of this privilege, and by means of a promise of this extension secure from the Hest Inn people the release with respect to the establishment of a building line thirty feet back from the present sidewalk line . There was discussion of the securing of the releases on other properties on the Avenue for establishment of this building line and a list of property owners was checked and assignments made to various members of the Board. Lr . Cosgrove was to get a correct list from the assessor ' s office and Mr. Emery was to prepare the release form to be used in af eeounsMention s JeJ of thesolicitationoioiiityyoi the l?osp a on tne ell ington Estate . W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass . September 13, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Cutler, Duffy, Glynn and Milne . The engineer' s report regarding the Vine Brook drainage project was reviewed and the ad- visability of providing a Planning Board preamble for it was discussed. Mr. Emery reported his further discussion of the project with Mr . Ryder, and indicated his feeling that it would be necessary for a development company to be formed by the Ryder interest in order that co-operation might guarantee to the town the betterments payments if the town undertook a work of such magnitude. It was felt that a report should more clearly develop the extent of the benefit of the drainage work beyond the immediate area reclaimed and available for building developments which the report indicated to be 185 acres . There was discussion of the doubtful possibility of an open channel design shown being possible between Vine Brook Road and Mass . Avenue, and it was suggested that this matter be reviewed further with the engineers . Mr. Emery felt that a further meeting with the engineers would be desirable and suggested certain arrangements . It later developed that it would be advisable if further meeting of the Planning Board be held on Monday September 17 at eight o' clock, at which the engineers' Mr. Raymond would be present . W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass . October 2, 1928. Present: Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Cutler and Milne . Copies of the engineer' s complete report on the Vine Brook drainage and development project was received. Copies were given to Messrs . Duffy, Cutler and Milne for further review . Discussion was chiefly on the proposed division of the zoning by-law, particularly on the limitation of individual lot sizes . Mr. Emery stressed the necessity for putting the amendments of the zoning law in shape for a town meeting to be held in November. It was proposed to amend the law to read to the effect that in all land hereafter laid out, each lot shall have a seventy foot frontage on the highway and an area of not less than 7000 sq . ft . , also that a side yard of not less than 10 ft. be required on each side of house and that a rear yard of not less than 30 ft . be provided, not over 30 per cent of which may be covered with accessory buildings . Mr. Duffy was quite insistent in his argument for a greater depth, but others present regarded 7000 ft . as the maximum in the way of a limitation which it would be expedient to try to secure . V 1�. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING LEXINGTON,MASS. October 26 and November 2,1928. These meetings were devoted to discussion of various sections of a new zoning by-law for the town, proposed to be presented to the town at a meeting to be held the latter part of November . W. D. I:`ilne, Clerk. AXt !tent '97.4011. 'resent 'Abeam. ?erg's 'line, Cutler rd - ' el ,SFr. has vas kield at the ":wn iiffioes on t e evening of 19LO after a luly published notice o: the ;r'opoatl to ek n:-e t o building Oy.li w. draft of the no' pro :.use(i eon!.rg by4 w )1 been prep'_ ed que4 *las distributed. (bout twont7.• three persons were iresent s s.i C7te entire proposed byiu.law was read a±x_ V1,C) vt r ioue sent z ons discussed. oue *Wootton developed on W.* _ 'u C of .r. 'ays.`..,h 11 her., the e requix nts for side.y rd.s insofar as t4..e7 af..aote t tho properties w!-ere lots were laid out _3rtar to the ai.ot'tton o: the zontne low. '. iturke c ; .r. - ointoph rased Quest!ons 1:1 regar,., to t' a sic* of get l state sicno wmatto4. •o toi"tl oallod ettentton to tyn 4ppprent prohibition o. enpo' ry reel-ost*te olfi.aes on now dovelornent. • 1.Vtit+nno i . Jan On ;`x. ., . .'utter !,-, �tsent ld t' it v".c, o in recArd to t.'xe rropobed lot sizes of Ino ` sq«ft. ' tt=ke 7Z-') ft, frontsce. x'. Johnson =.nu .,v. "oIntoth felt tLt thls ft harttsLtps but it rens.+r l the Hooting mewled to favor this provision. Hearing on Amendments to Zoning By-Law, held at Parker School, North Lexington, Monday, December 3rd, 1928. Present : Chairman F.L. Emery C.E.Glynn. The Hearing was called to order at 8.05 P.M. Chairman Emery read the Amendments proposed, explaining in detail the purposes and what was hoped to be accomplished by the changes. 4€-p. 3 Mr. Jas. H. Russell spoke in favor of defining the limitations of)n the C-1 District referred to in paragraph I, cpage 8 to conform to the intent of the original by-law. He claimed at the proposed amendment extends the limits of this C-1 District. Mr. White spoke in favor of the provisions of Section 6. Mr. Johnson referred to the success of developments by Mr. McPhee off Reed Street, where no lot had less than 60 ft . frontage, or contained less than 7500 ft. Mr. H.H. Johnson voiced a general objection to the limitations proposed by Section 6. Mr. McIntosh asked the Chairman for an explanation of his statement that the McIntosh developments were a liability to the Town on account of causing increased tax rates. Mr. John F.Fleming asked what effect the amendments would have on lots now existing, and was informed by the Chairman that lots laid out prior to the adoption of the amendments would not be affected thereby. Mr. G.j.Bean spoke in favor of limiting the frontage to 60 ft. instead of 75 ft. under Section 6, claiming that the developer cannot find a ready sale for lots with the greater frontage. Mr. McIntosh under reference to Sectin 10, asked what would be the effect on a mortgagee of a non-conforming structure in case 50% or over of such structure were destroyed. Lexington, ' nes, Present: _,{essrs. '_mery, -°ilne, Cutler tnd ' heeic r. hearing was held at the Toon Offices on t?)o evening of Decenber : , 1928 after a duly published notice of the proposal to change the building ay-law, draft of the no.r proposed zoning by-law had been pre p°a2ed .and tics distributed, rq,ou t twenty- three persons were present and the entire proposed by-law was read and. the various sections discussed. .,ome objection developed on the nn.rt of -4r. ;tarah.all :hen the requirements for side-yards insofar as they affected the properties where lots were .aid out prior to the adoption of the zoning law. z . aiurke and ';r, rcIntoah raised questions +.n regard to t °e size of real-estate signs permitted. 'r, 7cIntosh called attention to an apparent prohibition of temporary real-eatate offices on new development, •z�. n.1Kdman, r . John on 2,11d `+r, Cutter presented their vwewe in regard tm the proposed lot sizes of 7500 sq.ft. with 75 ft, frontage, Mr, Johnson -Lnd r. `'ointosh felt that this would work a hardship, but in gener<..1 the meeting seemed to favor this provision, .l « Milne, Clerk. Lexinfton, ''ass. Present: -'essra. "`msry, Chairman, ''hee1Fr Rams). hearing was held ..t the ?o3n Offices at 8 '. December 10 1928 on the petition of L?onald .hea to amend the zoning by-law to create a bu;;iness district at his property at 117-119 etc, 'l assachusetta Avenue, ast ...xtngton. There were some thirty people present. Thomas , . Cull- a apiieared for Oonalgo` ea. but presented. no reason shy this petition shoul brI , vor_ably regarded than those which had been presented by previous attorneys for r, hes at two previous hearings. Various people spoke in opposition,and on the call for votes it aper mored that practically the entire attendance was opposed to the creation of any more business district it this neighborhood for whatever purpose. .P. :'ilne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass . Saturday, December 15,1928 . Present: ILessrs. Emery, Glynn, Duffy, Cutler, Wheeler and Milne . The meeting was devoted to a further discussion of the details of the proposed amendment to the zoning by-law, particular attention being given to matters concerning lot sizes in present developed districts and in new districts . The definition of term "street" is used in the by-law to control all buildings on rear lots and the demolition clause affecting non-conforming buildings damaged by fire . Adjourned at 12 .15 a .m. i. U. Milne, Clerk. or 77 i"or The Year T'nding December . 1, 1928. The 11anning board has continued the practice f advising the Joard of :.Jurvey upon their request, in the matter of new lr.nd and street developments and has given specific consideration to the follm.ing ::ratters: Star healty Co. development,near Sylvia `t., rast Lexington. !IcIntosh development, Tedford :>t.,Nort!, Lexington, Nickerson development, ,. perces' Bridge. Building lines on °!assachusetts • ve .,t'ast Lexington. Hunt developrnent,near .locum hd. , Lexington. (riswold development, North Lexington. Lexington i-ark development, North Lexington. Bean development, (''etherbee 'ark) , Bedford t. , North Lexington. ...treet neer Kendall :toad for L. Kirkbright. The Board during the year held formal hearings upon the following subjects: Proposed changes in the zoning law to include in the single family dwelling district all the area between 'tassachusetts venue, altham `=t, and the : rark and Playground area, except that zoned for business, this area having originally been zoned as an R2 or tt:o_ family dwelling district. This change was adonted by the Toan. `'etttion of Donnld bee to a*::end the zoning law to create a :usiness district at 117-119,etc. "assachusetts `venue, Fast Lexington. The Board. has not recommended this change . 'roposed general revision of the zoning law. The 10 and has spent much time in the study of the i-orkings of the present zoning law and has proposed amendments tending to clarify it :nd to more effectively secure for the citizens those benefits .which were sought nhen the law was created. 'hue the proposed amendments in some instances increase the restrictions upon real est. te develop-lents, for the most part they are designed to bring the law into conformity with similar laws elsewhere and to en•.:ble the to :n more effectively to control its development and to avoid the introduction of inimical conditions possible under the present law. :'our public hearings .sere eld in various sections of the town in regard to these proposed amo aents . The gener%1 *+atter - 2 - report of the Planning Board. has now been referred by the Town to a committee of ten citizens appointed by the , electmen who are to serve in conjunction with the Planning Board and who ore to rt-port at a later torn meeting. The Board has continued its study of the development of the large low areas in the Vine Brook drainage basin mouth and west of the center, involving important considera- tions with respect to general drainage, park development, and streets for through traffic, and has had frequent meetings with the engineers, etcalf and ',.ddylwho have been employed in this connection. The rc-port of these engineers in regard to the drainage problems, the soil and other conditions, and upon the subject of betterments in this and adjoining areas is now in hand and the study of the whole is continuing. The Board favors more rapid progress in the matter of establishing proper and wider lines on the m;,ny old and narrow to:n ways, in order that the building of houses may not further imp it the opportunity for securing sightly 1.nd safe streets without excessive future exrence. The i oard, as previously, favors an improved organization of the Town engineering service hich ill permit of the establishment of a coherent policy and plan for the extension of the public facilities, sewers, water mains, streets, etc. on a broad economic basis, and at the same time rrovide for prompt gat 'ering of the engineering data necessary for the solution of immediate problems of development as well as those of tho future . .fespect.:=illy submitted, 1929 PLANNING BOARD Frederick L. Emery J. Henry Duffy C. Edward Glynn William D. Milne Clarence H. Cutler Nelson J. Bowers PLANNING BOARD MEETINC LEXINGTON, MASS . March 25, 1929 . Minutes of the Meeting Present: Messrs . Emery, Duffy, Bowers , Cutler, Milne and Engineer Cosgrove . Plan for development of the Robert L. Innis and Dougal Lennan property off School Street was considered at length and the plan prepared by the Town Engineer was deemed to be generally acceptable, but it was thought wise to have a definite layout made for School Street to allow for a fifty foot width before this development plan was finally approved. The plan for subdivision of the Baker Estate off Massachusetts Avenue submitted by W. R. Rice , Cambridge , was considered and it was voted that in view of the steep grade necessary for the development of the street and its immediate entry at this grade to the avenue as well as the general effect on the neighbor- hood, the approval of the Board should be withheld. The matter of the Ryder petition for action on the Vine Brook drainage basin development was brought out and discussed and it was agreed that this should have the early attention of the Board. Mr. F. L. Emery was re-elected chairman of the Planning Board for the year and Mr . Nelson Bowers was unanimously elected as clerk. W. D. Milne, Clerk. PLANNING BOARD DETING April 1, 1929 I•,embers present: - '"tilliam D . Milne , Frederick L. Emery, J . Henry Duffy, C . Edward Glynn and Nelson J. Bowers . The Town Engineer, John T . Cosgrove , was also pre sent. Evening spent in discussion of drainage and highway lay- outs for Vine Brook District . Er . Cosgrove to draw up plan showing drainage, Massachusetts Avenue to Waltham Street . Adjourned at 11: 00 to meet again when Er. Emery sets date . Meeting of the i'lanning Board April 29, 1929 Those present; Messrs. Emery, Milne, Glynn, Cutler, Duffy (Cosgrove) Discussion of proposed new highway from Lowell Street through to Bedford Street. Vianols petition for a Marquise in front of theatre. Board votes to send an opinion to the Selectmen to effect that Board is opposed to all projecting signs of any nature over public sidewalk. Discussion of site or sites for a new Central engine douse. Three sites mentioned; 1. Plot of land on Bedford Street on far side of Phelps Garage. 2. Plot of land owned by Bailie Blake on ',raltham Street oppo- site Forest Street. 3. Triangular plot of land bound- ed by Fletcher Ave., 1•oburn Street and the B. & M. R. R. tracks. Swimming Pool: Consensus of opinion of Planning Board that swimming pool committee confer with Planning Board and that further consideration should be given before plans for pool go any further. Such opinion to be conveyed to Selectmen by Chairman i;mery. Friday Evening, Aay 3, 1929. 4 AWING BEFORE SELECTMEN. 1. Hill Street - 50 foot layout proposed. Abuttors favor improving street by straightening out curves in street k Apja extent. 2. Proposed new road from Lowell Street through to Bedford street, by way of East Street - and from Nuaas Street over private lands to Bedford Street. That part of proposed road from Bedford Street almost to Hancock Street apparently favored by abuttors. nr. hull. Messrs. Jonas and Robbins and Mrs. Deerinaz sL.oka against proposed ssy as it crosses Hancock Street. whey claim the y would seriously Mamas the Ball, Jones and .Robbins properties. 'ley oug est alternative :ray by using north Hancock Street or Simonds Road, or a net? construction around and to the north of the hill over which fonds T:.oad runs. East Street - genera1 opposition to straightening out curves. Mr. Amery explains reason for through highway around Lexington. Messrs. Every, £ iffy, Bowers of aanning Board present. May 10, 1929 Mi. Cuitanco mat with the Tianning Board and discussed a plan for the public swimming pool. He loft )lane and correspondence with Mr. ]terry who in to bring the subject before a future mooting of the Planning bard. The Board is to consider present means as to their practicability and )Hake regio:scacsndaationn to the 7oard of ,olootLen. Mr. Cos' rove brodelt before tho attention of the Board a bluer*. priest layout of as eeetion of land prepared y the $tar Realty Com.. pony. "hie plot of land is bounded on one si{lo by Uassaachu)setts Arenue on another side by Sylvia street and the Arlington town-line and lies in a north.wsaterly direction frets the corner of Sylvia and Maseaahnsette Avenue. By motion of Ur. ';i; ry, it was voted to defer action on this subject until next mooting. The layout as is, is not eat .s3factory to the 'lapping DmIrd and lots ere laid out with a 7o foot frontage when in tho opinion of the Board, front¢«;a should be 75 feat to con., form with the new coning lax. By vote it l:.s decided that the Planning Board should at once tar up the subject of the pr000syed now road or taking for a road to run from aanoadhussette Avenue across Vine Brook Read throe/11 to ` alta&a !itroet. Mr. r21,377 fools that the time hash epee for definite actioa on this whole project on the part of the Planning Boar:i. In th© Hoar future the Time Brook Drainage schema by Metcalf and `eddy will be discussed with Mr. Startleff. ter. Cosgrove is to draw u7) a blue.' ri nt of the proposed road loading off of Hassachu otts Avenue across Vine Brook Road sac) the :.Tanning Board may have it for study and reference. Meeting adjanarnod tknbor* presswt -.7oros— i:nory, Glynn, Milne, Duffy. Cutler and l ow_:re. May 21, 1929. 111 Planning Board Meeting with Board of Selectmen. Subject; Discussion of Proposed Public Swimming Pool . Mr. Theodore Custance opened discussion. Mr. Emery discussed Vine Brook Drainage System and proposed new roads in leading up to swimming pool. Mr. Shurtleff g-ve his views and presented his criticisms of the swimming pool plans which the "Swimming Pool Committee" had drawn up. Mr. Shurtleff suggested that be :ter location could be found. Mr. Emery charged that "Swimming Pool Committee" was forcing project thro without careful study as to location or orienta- tion. Present: Emery, Glynn and Bowers. Signed: Nelson J. Bowers , Secretary. 111 May 26, 1929. 7:00 P. M. Joint Meeting of Planning Board and Board of Selectmen held on the Playground at end of Parker Street. Purpose of Meeting was to go over the proposed sites of the swimming pool . Different proposed sites were paced out and criticised. The matter of dust on windy days from tennis courts was dis- cussed and the orientation of the pool to get the most sunshine was discussed. Mr. Emery suggested a possible site on the easterly side of the road from the Parker end of the playground. Town Engineer is to make soundings of this site and otter sites on the playground and result of such soundings will be discussed at a future meeting of the planning board. Present: Emery and Bowers. Signed: Nelson J. Bowers, Secretary. May 27, 1929. Meeting of Planning Board. Purpose: Hearing for amendments to Zoning By-laws as printed, and approved by Attorney - Journal. Numerous errors and omissions crept in, such as commas left out, or commas wrongly inserted, and in some places certain paragraphs were left in which should have been struck out. Mr. Neil McIntosh and three others w,ere present to find out what amendments were proposed. These people left shortly after 8:00 p. m. Members of the planning board worked until shortly after midnight preparing data and corrections necessary to prepare amendments to propose at next town meeting. Members of Planning Board Present: Emery, Duffy, Cutler, Bowers together with Cosgrove, Town Engineer. Signed: Nelson J. Bowers , Secretary. June 3, 1929. Meeting of Planning Board. Purpose of Meeting: k''urther reading of recently passed Zoning Laws and the checking up of corrections made at last meet- ing. Mr. Wrightington, Town Counsel, was present and all corrections in the form of amendments were verified by him so that necessary amendments might be in proper form for voting on at the next town meeting. Those present: Emery, Duffy, Glynn and Bowers. Signed: Nelson J. Bowers, Secretary. June 10, 1929. Meeting of Planning Board. Board unanimously approves and recommends for favorable consideration and further hearing the proposed new road continuing from East Street across Adam` Street and connecting with Bedford Street, as shown in yellow outline on a map in the Town Engineer's office dated and corrected to June 10, 1929. Vine Brook Drainage System. Proposed road from Massachusetts Avenue to and across Vine Brook Road and diagonally over to Waltham Street was discussed. Mr. Cosgrove has drawn up a map showing a tentative road lay-out. After discussion the Board felt that a road constructed diagonally across to Waltham Street- to include the present sewer would make a satisfactory approach to the proposed park area. Mr. Cosgrove is to make some corrections to his map for further discussion by the Board. Matter of establishing building lines toward Arlington end of Massachusetts Avenue again discussed and Mr. Cosgrove tQ approach several land owners of land with the idea of taking up this item at a future meeting. Application of Mona A, Holland t9teerect a tearoom on her property on Massachusetts Avenue almost oppositelTottler Avenue. The Board decided that this matter was for the attention of the Board of Appeals and the Secretary was instructed to so inform Mrs . Holland. Present Emery, Glynn, Duffy, Cutler and Bowers. Signed: Nelson J. Bowers , Secretary. ilugust 8, 1929. Hearing on proposed extension of East Street through to Bedford Street. Members of Planning Board present: Emery & Bowers . Considerable opposition to the proposed layout, most opposition centering on that section between Hancock Street and Bedford Street. Nelson J. Bowers, Secretary. Planning Board Lexington, Mass. Minutes of the Meeting Sept. 13, 1929. Members present: Emery, Duffy, Glynn, Milne , Cutler, Bowers , and Town Engineer, Cosgrove. Vine Brook Drainage. Subject discussed. Mr. Ryder wrote Mr. Emery on August 2, that he and his brother were going ahead on their develop- ment plans . They are , at present, surveying a street from Winthrop Road through to Waltham Street. They expect to lay out this road as soon as possible. This action has approv=al of the Planning Board and the Board intends to cooperate as far as possible with the Ryders . It is felt that it is not yet the right time to appear before the Town for an appropriation to provide drainage for this district. Waltham Street widening. Business district now goes down both sides of Waltham Street to Vine Brook Road. The Board suggests an additional width for Waltham Street of twenty feet, whether to be all on one side or part on each side was not decided. Voted to have Mr. Cosgrove , Town Engineer, to make a study of this subject and to make suggestions . Mr. Cosgrove presented a blue print of the Golden Guernsey Farm proposed development. This property is back from. Marrebt Road and is borderedon one side by the Sarano property and Lincoln Street. 1 PLANNING BOARD LEXINGTON, MASS. September 20, 1929 . - MINUTES OF TIE MEETING- Present: Messrs . Emery, Glynn, Cutler, Duffy, Milne and Cosgrive . Consideration was given to the request of the Lexington Trust Company for a recommendation as to the set-back for their new building on Muzzey Street. The site for the new Central Fire Engine Station was considered at request of the Selectmen and the clerk was asked to write to the Selectmen recommending the plot on Fletcher Avenue and Woburn Street . The plan of the Golden Guernsey development off Lincoln Street was reviewed and some suggestions made to Mr . Cosgrive for the arrangement of the connecting roads . The matter was left in his hands for final adjustment, the feeling being that the interior arrangement for this development was generally satisfactory. Planning Board Lexington, Mass. Minutes of the Meeting. September 27, 1929. Present: Emery, Milne , Cutler, Duffy, Bowers , and Town Engineer, Cosgrove. Subject: East Lexington Fire Station Site. It was voted by this board that the present site would be the best site for a new Fire station for East Lexington. The Board considers that it would be most economical for the town to use this site inasmuch as the town already owns the land, providing of course that there are no outstanding objections that have not come to the attention of the Planning Board. The Board understands that there is little need for the present hall for public functions . Golden Guernsey Development. Board approves of several changes made by Mr. Cosgrove , Town Engineer, in lay out of roads as indicated in red on a blue print in the town office described as "Proposed Development of Golden Guernsey Farm, dated April 1929. " c9^ Planning Board Lexington , Mass. Minutes of the Meeting October 7, 1929. Members present: Emery, Milne, Bowers. Hearing before Planning Board on Five Forks Corner proposition as to whether this sectionshould be a business section or whether it shall be decided to recon-rend that this be restored to a strictly residential section. Meeting called to order by Chairman Emery, at 8.15 P. M. Mr. Emery explained the purpose of the meeting. Mr. George H. McDermott asked about a section of the Zoning Law having to do with Five Forks. He also wanted to know if this meeting was called by Planning Board or by fifty per cent of those owners near Five Forks . Mr. Emery ansdered, "By both". Mr. Heaney objects to Five Forks becoming residential. He loses his temper several times and is told to sit dorm by Chair- man. Mr. Miller speaks in favor of having residential section. Mr. Scheibe in favor of residential section. Mr. Webb Frank Goldman representing Innes and McClellan, argues that his clients will suffer--that his clients bought land and gave a seven foot strip of land to the town on School Street on strength of a part of the land being in a business section. Mr. McDermott also makes same objections as Mr. Goldman. Mr. McDermott is interested in Innes and McClellan property as a mort- gagee. He holds a first mortgage of 413 ,000. given on Oct. 15, 1928 which was raised to `13,600. In June 1929. George H. McDermott is located at 75 Tremont Street, Boston, Mass. _2_ October 7, 1929. Mrs . Sa:ran.o objects to having business property in vigcin_ity of her home. Mr. Heaney infavor of any business that wants to come to Five Forks . He does not favor any change in Zoning; Law. Mr Miller does not object to any business being at Five Forks . He signed petition for change at Mr. Saran.o 's request. Chairman Finery objects to conduct of opposition and adjourns meeting. 9 Planning Board (Five Forks ) Lexington, Mass . Minutes of the Meeting. October 8, 1929. Present: Emery, Glynn, Milne , Cutler, Bowers , and Board of Selectmen. Subject: New Fire Station Sites Mr. Emery speaks for Planning Board in favor of triangular plot of _land on Mass. Avenue between Fletcher Avenue & R. R. track. Mr. Devine of Fire Station Site Committee speaks in favor of site on "'althorn St. offered as a donation by Hallie Blake. Mr. Emery suggests that Chief Taylor prepare for Selectmen & Planning Board rough plans for fire station including in plans what he thinks town needs for a station and apparatus . Mr. Emery asks Selectmen to postpone action on application for permit for filling station on south east corner of Five Forks until Planning Board can reconsider Five Forks and study tentative plans for a new and different layout of this junction. Lexington Planning Board Meeting October 28, 1929. Present: Emery , Glynn, Cutler, Bowers , and Cosgrove , Town Engineer. Five Forks Intersection discussed Board not entirely agreed on adopting Mr. Emery's suggestion to do away with the triangle and also doing away the right fork of Lincoln Street. Mr. Cosgrove to draw up several new plans of Five Forks for further discussion. Mr. Custance offers for study of the Planning Board a plan calling for a proposed street leading off Mass. Avenue near Summit Avenue to lead over and connect with Columbus Street in one direction and another fork to cross the Old County Road and connect with Bellflower Street at junction of Bellflower and Balfour Street. Mr. Custance also asks Planning Board to reconsider proposed street between Mass . Avenue and Vine Brook Road. Mr. Custance says that proposed street should be narrower than 100 feet. Planning Board to study matter. Lexington Planning Board Meeting November 4, 1929. Mr. Barnes representing Mr. Rider presents plans of Vine Brook Drainage Area. It seems that he came to get information from Planning Board as to lay out of roads . Mr. Emery promised hearty cooperation of the Board. Five Forks Junction. Board has spent several sessions on trying to arrive at the best solution of the traffic situation and whether or not Board should recommenda change in the zoning laws at this junction. Shall Board recommend change in laws so that there shall be no business on the northerly side of this junction, or shall they leave zoning law as is and allow business within 200 feet in all directions from junction. Board agrees to keep triangle of land intact instead of throwing it into a roadway. It had talked of giving right fork of Lincoln Street to Mr. Elliot in exchange for this triangle plot. Mr. Cosgrove to approach Mr. Elliot to get his price on triangular plot if town would buy it for a park space. Lexington Planning Board Meeting November 18, 1929. Members Present: Emery, Glynn, Duffy, Bowers , Cosgrove, Town Engineer. Vine Brook Drainage: Proposed road from Massachusetts Avenue , to Vine Brook Road discussed: Moved and seconded that Planning Board recom- mend to Selectmen an eighty foot roadway, forty feet to be a traveled way and forty feet for marginal grass plots and sidewalk space. Secretary instructed to so notify Selectmen. Five Forks; Agreed that Town should try to buy triangular piece of land from owner Richard P. Elliot. Board not agreed on recommending that land to north of Lincoln Street be put back in residence zone . Action to be put over until full board meets . Board agreed that as Board has not used all its appropriation some money be paid to Mr. Shurtleff for his services , after Mr. Shurtleff has sent a bill for services . Spencer Street: Board approves a layout for extension of this street as submitted by Robbins & Smith. Secretary instructed to notify Selectmen. Hinchey Road: Relative to installation of street lights on Hinchey Road: Upon assurance of Town Engineer,whatever additional streets may be laid out or whatever other changes may be made in develop- ment of adjoining properties Hinchey Road is likely to remain substantially as laid down on plan entitled "Plan q,4 Profile of Hinchey Road in Lexington 3/1928, F. P. Cutter C. E. (2 sheets ) , Voted that no objection appears to installation of street lamps on Hinchey Road, if such installation is otherwise found to be expedient by Selectmen. Lexington Planning Board Meeting November 25, 1929. ?resent: Emory, Milne, Glynn, Duffy, Cutler, & Bowers. Mr. Barnes presented a new lay out for a development of the Vine Brook Area, Planning Board sugger ted that Mr. Barnes, perhaps in conjunction with Mr, Cosgrove, Town Engineer, make further soundings to make sure of his lar out, Be is to confer with Planning Board a week from today. Voted to pay to fir. t:hurtleff from "lannin , Pofard Appropriation the sum of ,25OJ, on account of his bill rendered. L<cidod tit Planning Board should ask the town to appro- priate :500. for its use for next year, that being the amount of appropriation for this past year. Five Forks: Mr. r"mery to have Mr. Cosgrove draw up a new lay out of Five Forks according to idea of Mr. 'Time discussed this evening. Planning Board Meeting Lexington, Mass. December 2, 1929 . Present: Emery, Glynn, Higgins of Town Engineer' s Dept. , Mr. Duffy was with us part time. Five Forks : At a final discussion the Planning Board voted to recommend to the Board of Survey that the triangle of land be retained and not thrown into a highway, and furthermore that the Town negotiate with the owner Mr. R. D. Elliott for the purchase of the triangular plot as indicated by a plan which will be prepared by the Town engineer to illustrate suggestions of Planning Board, and bring out the treatment of Five Forks Junction as thought out by said Board. Rough sketch is also sent Board of Survey showing what Planning Board at first had in mind. This sketch shows the elimination of the triangular piece of land and the elimination of the northerly fork of Lincoln Road. After studying this layout at several meetings the Board felt that the curb lines would be too far apart and that this condition would offer too great a risk to pedestrians wishing to cross this junction. Hinchey Road: The Planning Board voted to recommend for approval by the Board of Survey the layout of Hinchey Road as shown on a plan entitled "Plan and Profile of Hinchey Road at Lexington, 3/1928, F. P. Cutter, C. F. , scale Hor. 40, Vert. 6, " except that the southwesterly end of said Road be considered by the Town Engineer and determined if it be left in such direction as will permit of its ultimate proper extension when required. Massachusetts Fed. of Planning Boards : Voted: that yearly dues of cls. be at once sent to the State organization instead of waiting for January 1, bill. Mr. Emery to take care of this matter, PLANNING BOARD MEETING ( with Mr. Barnes ) LEXINGTON, MASS. DECEMBER 9 , 1929. Present: Emery, Glynn, Milne , Duffy, Cutler, and Cosgrove . Vine Brook Road: Drainage problem and highways discussed with Mr. Barnes who had had certain soundings made to help determine location of roads and he was asked to meet with Planning Board on. Friday, December 13 . Planning Board Meeting Lexington, Mass. December 16, 1929. Present: All but Mr. Bowers and Town Engineer. Harold B. Lamont of Winthrop Road appeared to protest against any extension of a road at the rear of his lot. No approved plan of such an extension was found and the owner of land in question, Mr. Black was called and said he did not desire any such road extension. Mr. Lamont was therefore satisfied. Mr. Ryder and Engineer Roland Barnes , presented plans for Vine Brook development of land east southeast of Waltham Street with soundings by Mr. Barns , which suggested to the Board a change in proposed Street layout for better lots , easier road building and retaining some areas for park purposes . Mr. Barnes will present a change in the plan Friday evening , December 20. Planning Board Meeting. Lexington, Mass . December 30, 1929. Present: Emery, Glynn, Butler, Bowers , and Cosgrove. Five Forks lone : Petition of Mr. Sarano to restore part of this junction to a residential section read by Chairman Emery and matter discussed. Board unanimously agreed to recommend that Town restore this junction as petitioned. Board agrees that Mr. Cosgrove should cooperate for the Town with State and County engineers in matter. of widening and improving of Concord Avenue from Cambridge to Concord. / , r /I/ • ` I Vel / PLANNING BOARD REPORT FOR 1929 The activities of the Planning Board during the first two months of the year were devoted almost entirely to considera- tion of the proposed amendments to the Zoning Law. The original Zoning Law, that hadbeen in force since April, 1924, had been found by experience to require amendment in order to provide adequate protection for the town. Proposed amendments to that end were presented by the Planning Board to the town at a Town Meeting held on December 17th, 1928, and were refered back by the town for further consideration by the Planning Board jointly with a committee appointed by the Selectmen. This joint committee held frequent meetings for considera- tion of the subject and arranged several public hearings to give all citizens opportunity to appear to inquire as to various as- pects of the proposed amendments and to offer suggestions and objections, with the result that upon the unanimous report of this joint committee , the town at the session of its annual meet- ing held March 18, 1929, adopted the amendments reported, and which were in the main as originally proposed by the Planning Board . The Zoning Law as amended now affords the town the best protection that is probably to be had against unduly congested and other undesirable developments . The most important of the amendments adopted are those increasing the minimum frontages of lots in any development from 50 ft . to 75 ft . , and minimum areas from 5,000 sq. ft . to 7,500 sq. ft . , and the adoption of a provision that dwellings hereafter erected upon back lands shall have the same minimum lot areas as those that front upon the main highways and shall be provided with approach streets established under the Board of Survey Act and following hearings by the Board of Survey. In- creasing the minimum frontages and lot areas will tend to pro- tect the town against the most dangerous kind of lot develop- ments , and the amendment relating to the erection of dwellings upon back lots will protect the town against dangerous and con- gested developments on the rear ends of excessively deep lots that some developers have foundit expedient to lay out . Our present Zoning Law is generally pronounced to be among the best in the Commonwealth. It is, however, too much to expect that it will stand without further amendment because from time to time , as conditions change , it will be necessary, as well. as desirable , to amend it in various respects, to keep it abreast of the times. One possible amendment is already before the Planning Board . Prior to the adoption of the principal amendments of March last, a petition was received from residents in the -2- vicinity of "The Five Forks" so called, asking that the Zoning Law be amended to eliminate business on both sides of Lincoln Street except the southerly corner lots on Parrett Road, and upon both sides of Parrett hoad and School Street north of Lincoln Street . The petition was based upon the feeling of the residents that there was no present call for the large business area provided by the existing Zoning Law, and that it was better to restore a substantial part of it to the status of a residential district until a real need for an enlarged business district in that locality should develop. At the request of the Planning Board, the petitioners generously consented to defer consideration of this petition un- til after the other and more important amendments were disposed of. It was felt that to inject this particular matter into the broader project then under consideration would tend to con- fuse the entire subject . Now that the main amendments are out of the way, this particular matter will be brought before the town at an early date . In this connection it is well to state that there is at present a preponderance of opinion that it is better not to provide business districts very much beyond immediate require- ments . 1,Jhen our Zoning Law was adopted, the best opinion was to provide business districts in advance of immediate require- ments, but experience in Lexington, as well as elsewhere, has shown pretty conclusively that to so plan means a scattered development within the business districts, by isolated stores, ill-arranged and undesirable from every angle . Such scattered business development does not add appreciably to the value of the property as business property, and it practically ruins inter- vening residential properties so that no worthwhile improvement comes from the development . By keeping the business districts down approximately to immediate or immediately prospective needs, a more compact business development is assured, appreciation of values is attained and unnecessary depreciation of residential values is avoided. ` hile it is probably unwise to undertake to interfere very much with what has already been allotted to business development, it will henceforth be well to be governed by past experience and not unnecessarily increase provision for future business beyond the then immediate requirements; and where , as in "The Five Forks" district , a strong sentiment has developed for a return of a part from business to residential uses, such change may well be made . Following disposal of the zoning Law, the Planning Board has been busy throughout the year upon other and miscellaneous matter, many of which were and are of substantial importance . One of these matters related to the display of "For Sale" and. " Sold" signs upon various properties throughout the town. Being of the opinion that the increasing number of such -3- signs upon our principal streets - frequently several signs to a lot - not only seriously disfigured the town, but also tended to create a false impression that something was wrong with the town, the Planning Board sough the co-operation of the Fealtors in some agreement to regulate the practice . Accordingly, in June last, communications upon the sub- ject were addressed to a large number of Realtors - opinions were sought and suggestions were invited, following which, upon invitation of the Planning Board, some twenty Realtors doing bus- iness in Lexington met with the Board in the Selectmen's room on the evening of October 21st , for a discussion. the possibility was considered of an agreement to refrain from posting such signs altogether, there being a large body of well considered opinion that the display of signs does not pro- mote advantageous sales of properties . surprising as it may seem, the Realtors, themselves were willing to agree to dispense with the signs but, since no way could be found for bringing individual property owners within such an agreement , it was necessary to abandon the idea as im- practicable . The Realtors, however, did agree unanimously to erect no " Sold" signs thereafter in Lexington; that all existing "For Sale" or "For Rent" signs that did not conform to the new Zoning Law restriction or six square feet maximum area should be replaced by signs conforming to such restriction; that all "For Sale" or "For Rent" signs should thereafter be mounted upon one or more posts instead of being nailed upon trees, and that all existing signs that were nailed to trees should be re- moved as promptly as possible ; that all signs thereafter erected should be set back twenty feet from the sidewalk to conform with the Zoning Law set-back requirement; and that none of the Realtors would thereafter install a "For Sale" or "For Rent" sign upon any property in Lexington that already carried one such sign. It is believed that the appearance of the town will be much improved when the foregoing agreements shall have been put into effect . A gratifying result of the conference was the unanimous expression from the Realtors present of their belief in our Zoning Law, their willingness to work for its enforcement and their confidence in the town itself. They were outspoken in their emphasis of the high standing of Lexington among the towns of the b.etropolitan District and pledged their efforts to maintain that standing so far as within their power. A great deal of time has been given to the general sub- ject of the drainage and development of the Vine Brook drainage area. The project itself is a large one and of very great im- portance to the town. If that area is not drained and rendered -4- suitable for first-class residential development, it is certain to go to a low-class, undesirable development. If well developed, it will bring a large taxable return to the town; if it goes to an undesirable development, it will become an actual charge upon the town. e are very glad to report that the principal owner of property in that area, Mr. Charles W. Ryder, is co-operating heartily with the Planning Board, with the end in view of ob- taining the best possible development for residential purposes . Mr. Ryder' s engineer has been working closely with the Planning Board and, as the result of the many studies and conferences that have been had, the Planning Board has recently informally approved the proposed layout of streets, etc . , and that layout is now before the Board of purvey for definite and authoritative action. The area above referred to as having had intensive study, is that located between Highland Avenue and 14altham Street, and extending from Vine Brook Road to the vicinity of Marrett Road. The Planning Board now contemplates detailed study of the remainder of the area to the west of Waltham Street, embracing what gener- ally may be referred to as the "Playground" area. The Planning Board is of the opinion that the importance of this development justifies any amount of time and study that may reasonably be required for its adequate presentation to the town. Considerable study has been given to the proposed estension of East Street through to Bedford Street . In addition to the preliminary hearings held by the Selectmen, which the Planning Board attended, the Planning Board, with representatives of the Selectmen, attended a joint hearing in Arlington at which Chair- man Harriman, of the Metropolitan Planning Division, explained plans to make of the proposed East Street extension a more im- portant highway than had been originally planned. This project has developed to a point where the Metropolitan Planning Division has now introduced before the Legislature a bill to provide for the widening and development of the Alewife Brook Boulevard and to amplify its connection with the Mystic Boulevard, which is to be straightened and widened to its connection with Summer Street, which latter is also to be straightened and widened, continuing up Lowell Street to East Street . Thence East Street is to be widened and straightened , or a new boulevard built, that will extend across the open area to the west of Adams Street and, touching Grove Street , will cross the open country to the west thereof and join Bedford Street in the vicinity of the Lexington-Bedford line . This will provide an ample cut-off for traffic originating in New Hampshire and destined for Medford, Revere , Malden and points north of Boston, and will remove the major part of such traffic from Massachusetts Avenue through the center of the town. The bill proposes that this road, so far as Lexington is concerned, shall be built at the sole expense of the Commonwealth except that the town will be required to cover the land damages. Since the land is not at present particularly valuable , and since the owners would be benefited by the construction and are generally in favor of it , the cost to the town should not be much more than nominal. It is under- -5- stood , however, that the bill, if passed, will be conditioned upon the town, at some later date , providing at its own ex- pense a cut-off from Summer Street to Maple Street, to eliminate the present sharp junction point, so as to improve the present way from Summer Street to Marrett Road in East Lexington. Other street matters considered by the Planning Board were : a new layout for Hill Street; `:altham Street widening; plan for proposed street leading off Massachusetts Avenue near Summit Avenue to connect with Columbus Street ; Spencer Street layout; Hinchey Road layout ; and the rearrangement of the streets at "The Five Forks" . This latter project has engaged the study of the Planning Board at several of its meetings, and has proved to be a problem of unusual complexity. The principal question has been whether to retain the present triangular area at the junction point or to remove it and, dispensing with the cut-off now flanking the triangular plot at its northerly side , bring the intersections down to the more simple form of crossing of Lincoln Street and Marrett Road, with wide curves at the four corners. The Planning Board has finally recommended the reten- sion of the triangular area. The matter of building lines on Massachusetts Avenue near the Arlington line has hadvery considerable further attention bar the rlanning Board, but as yet no definite results can be re- ported. The board is still at work upon the subject and it is hoped something by way of advance may be reported during the coming year. The Planning Board has considered the subject of sites for new Fire Engine houses, both at the center and East Lexing- ton, and has reported its recommendations to the Selectmen. Considerable study was given to the project of the Swim- ming Pool recently constructed by the town, and its recommenda- tions were reported to the selectmen. A number of hearings were held for consideration of what is known as the Innis and IvicLellan development between School street and Marrett Road, extending from Massachusetts Avenue down to the apex at "The Five Forks" . The owners showed a very commendable willingness to co-operate with the Planning Board, with the result that a satisfactory layout was arrived at and recommended to the Board of purvey for adoption. Consideration was given to a proposed development of the Baker estate at 1404 Massachusetts Avenue , which was to serve as the basis for a sale . The plan submitted was not approved by the Planning Board and the sale was not consummated. The owner of a property is of course privileged to develop it whenever he so desires and considers it to be to his interest to do so. It is not within the power of the town ordinarily to prevent such a development ; all that can be done is to regulate it, so far as possible , for the benefit of the town - and that means usually for the benefit of the owner also, since the -6- interest of both town and owner are in the final analysis ordinarily found to be identical. This regulation of development in general is the business of the Planning Board, and the Baker project was an instance in point. It would be better both for the town and for the owner to have the property developed, if at all, in con- junction with a larger scheme involving neighboring properties , but if this cannot be had, and development is insisted upon, the plan recommended by the Planning Board appears to be next best . At any rate , it cannot be developed otherwise than in accordance with that plan without further hearings and approval by the officials of the town. Plans were also considered and approvedby the "Planning Board for development of what is known as the "Golden Guernsey Farm" , property on Lincoln Street west of "The Five rorks" . This development also has not yet progressed to actual accomplish- ment, but the plans are approved for such development if and when it becomes expedient to undertake it . More or less time has been consumed at a number of meet- ings of the Board in connection with the development by the Star Realty Company of property on and adjacent to Sylvia Street, r ast Lexington. No definite plans have resulted from this con- sideration. The various plans submitted from time to time by the owners have not been satisfactory to the Planning Board and approval has been withheld. Numerous other and minor matters have come up for con- sideration and appropriate action taken. The work of the Planning Board is still hampered by lack of engineering service, and it is hoped that at the coming Town 'oleeting an appropriation may be made that will make possible the needed engineering staff. Instead of being in advance of the individual develop- ments in the town, the board in almost every instance is behind them, and instead of being able to outline broad constructive plans to which local developments shall be made to conform, the work of the board is largely confined to jumping from one in- dividual project to another, regulating as best it can the in- dividual developments without opportunity to coordinate them with the more important and larger plans . This unsatisfactory line of work must continue until the town provides additional en- gineers to permit the Planning Board to obtain the data that will make it possible to plan ahead in anticipation of individual developments . As it is now, when an individual owner wishes to develop his farm, or when a realtor purchases a farm for development, it is his right to have a plan therefor approved with reasonable promptness . Because of our inability to plan ahead and present a major scheme already developed, to which minor or individual plans shall be adapted, the Planning Board is now obliged to -7- drop whatever work it is engaged upon and take up the individual plan last presented, act upon it as best it can, and then take up another, and so on, jumping from one scheme to another. While in the main we have been able to handle the various propositions with a fair degree of satisfaction and, on the whole, in a manner to protect the town, it is clearly not the best procedure , and a time will come at no distant date when these individual develop- ments will be found to block larger and more important plans that have to do with necessary through highways and open play- ground and park areas, all of which should have been laid out in advance of the subordinate developments. Respectfully submitted, Frederick L. Emery, Chairman C . Edward Glynn, J. Henry Duffy, William D. 'Milne , Clarence H. Cutler, lelson J. Bowers, Clark. 1930 PLANNING BOARD Frederick L. Emery J. Henry Duffy C. Edward Glynn William D. Milne Clarence H. Cutler Edgar F. Scheibe PLANNING BOARD MEETING LEXINGTON, MASS. JANUARY 6, 1930. Present: Emery, Glynn, Bowers , with Mr. Barnes and Mr. Leslie Ryder. Vine Brook Section: Voted. by Planning Board that Yr . Barnes ' plan be approved and that such a recommendation tie sent to the Board of Survey. The plan as shown tonight is to show Bloomfield Street carried straight through to a junction with the double barreled roadway. Approval of this layout to be held until layout with Bloomfield Street properly extended is again shown to Planning Board. Planning Board Meeting Lexington, Mass. January 13, 1930. Present: Emery, Milne , Glynn, Duffy, Cutler, Bowers and Cosgrove. *Five Forks : Secretary to notify Mr. Sarano petitioner and send him copy of this recommendation. Notify him that it will be his duty to see that article is prepared for town warrant of next town meeting and for him to arrange for some one to make motion in town meeting. A layout of a street from Hancock to Meriam Streets was discussed. Vine Brook Drainage: Voted: that matter of immediately taking action on lowering drainage channel from Vine Brook area across Mass. Avenue be studied. Agreed that Mr. Emery shall request Selectmen to allow Cosgrove to keep his present force so that engineering department can work on Vine Brook drainage , preparing charts etc. , and estimating costs of lowering drainage across Mass. Avenue. School House Site: Voted: to ask Town Engineer to give us a layout showing approaching streets , topography, etc. , from Waltham Street easterly in connect' on with proposedschool house site . Voted: also to request Town Engineer to suggest a street development for the entire tract and plot in the lot lines. * Five Forks : The Planning Board recommended that the following areas now zoned for C#fl districts be restored to R#1 district, viz.-- Marrett Rd. North of Lincoln; both sides ; Lincoln St. west of Marrett Rd. and both branches east of Marrett Rd. , both sides , except for 100 feet East and "rest at the Southerly line of Lincoln St. to accommodate the depth of C#1 lots fronting on Marrett Rd. at the corner of Lincoln St. ; and School St. both sides , all as set forth on a plan of said chane:e prepared by the Town Engineer and dated January 22, 1930. Planning Board Meeting Lexington, Massachusetts January 20, 1930. Present: Emery, Milne, Glynn, Cutler, Duffy, Bowers and Cosgrove. Mr. Bagley of Fairchild Aerial Surveys gave a talk on an aerial survey of Lexington to provide town with valuable photographs and enlargements for benefit of term in uncovering unassessed property for use of most of departments of town including assessors and Planning Board. Moved and. seconded that Planning Board recommend to Board of Selectmen that town procure a Mosaic survey, from the air, of the whole town, including enlargements , all to cost slightly under 4,000. Planning Board Meeting Lexington, Massachusetts February 10, 1930. Present: Emery, Glynn, Cutler, Milne, Duffy, Bowers and Cosgrove, Planninga Board understands that Selectmen have recommended an appropriation of $3,000. for an Aerial Survey of Lexington. Price of , 2,688. includes a wall map at 400 scale. Sections of 100 scale of whole town would cost 0.,005. additional. Planning Board wonders if it would be more economical to recommend for this additional . 1,005. now or to buy 100 scale maps a few at a time at x'10. per map. Comparison of costs to be presented by Cosgrove at next meeting. Mr. Emery states that the opinion of the Board is that Planning Board is through with that section of Vine Brook Drainage from Vine T rook Road to outlet-- that section now being up to Selectmen to secure bids for work to do this section, co:,ts , etc. Planning Board must go ahead on study of plans for the Rider land back of Vine Brook Road, Mr. carnes has a map showing all roads through the Hider properties. Cosgrove will try to get a copy of this map for Planning Board. Board understands that Selectmen favor the elimination of the triangle of land at the Five Forks Junction. This is contrary to recommendation of Planning Board, but Board cannot do much more than protest. lir PLANNING BOARD MEETING • Lexington, Mass. March 3, 1930 . Present :- Messrs. Glynn, Milne, Cutler, Bowers and Assistant Town Engineer. Assistant Engineer instructed to have Mr. Golden Cosgrove relocate a certain road on the Golden Guernsey Guernsey Development so said road will be entirely on said develop- ment instead of cutting across land of Mr. Sarano. Mr. Development Cosgrove to relocate this road by curving it to avoid Sarano ' s land . Petition of Mona A. Holland filed away because Planning Board has no jurisdiction. If Mrs. Holland ever brings up matter it was decided that she would have to bring her request before a Town Meeting. Petition of Mr. Bradstreet to continue manu- Bradstreet facturing a soft drink on his property on Blossom Street petition laid over for future discussion. Layout for extension of Oakland street referred Oakland back to Town Engineer for new layout and profile for use street at next meeting of the Planning Board. Extension Layout showing proposed location for new school house to be brought up at next meeting with topography drawn in by Town Engineer. PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, amass. April 4, 1930 Present:- Messrs. Emery, Duffy, Milne, Cutler, Engineer Cosgrove and Town Counsel,Wrightington. Chairman named Cutler as clerk for the meeting. Chas. F. Smith and George F. Smith, 164 Bedford Street appeared to ask for a business district at the corner of Bedford Street and Valley Road. No plan or Smith map was submitted. The Board designated the area as Petition affected by the proposed change for the necessary signa- tures of the property owners accompanying a petition for the proposed business district. ( Area designated filed herewith. ) Letter and plan from George W. Bean asking for Sean Petition a business district adjoining 241 Bedford Street. No action taken. Letter and plan filed herewith. At the request of Chairman Emery, Ted Worthen appeared before the Board to explain his stand on Vine Brook drainage which summed up was "That it was a dangerous Vine Brook precedent not to assess betterments on all the drained area except the North Brandh until the work is done there ." Adjourned at about eleven P . M. until Monday evening April 7,1930 at 8. C . H. Cutler Clerk Pro-Tem. Called Meeting of the Lexington Planning Board - May 10, 1930 at 8 P.E. In reorganizing Mr. F. L. Emery was elected as chairman, and ;ir. F. acheibe appointed as clerk. Most of the evening was occupied with a discussion with Mr. Rider relative to betterment assessment in connection with the Vine Brook sewer. Mr. Rider showed a very fair attitude toward the assessment as he will probably be the one whose property will pay the major portion of the south branch of the proposed sewer. Final conclusion will be arrived at later, when he has had time to work out the proposition with his attorney. Various matters relative to rezoning for different purposes have been put over until further data could be securea and to a later meeting. ��- / . Clerk !.ay 14, 1930 a 11, lir PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, Mass. May 26, 1930. Present: - Emery, Glynn, Dutler, Milne, Duffy,Town Engineer and Clerk. Eugene Kraetzer has asked to have the zoning Triangle at law on the triangle at Woburn Street and Fletcher Avenue W burn St & changed from a single family dwelling to a business area. Fetcher Ave . His idea is to build a block of stores and have the surrounding storekeepers move into the block. A letter was written him stating that he must file a petition for same. The petition from Mr. Floyd A. Bradstreet of BB Blossom Street to continue the manufacture of soft drinks Petltittonet was acted on. A letter was written him saying that we could do nothing about it until he petitioned the Board to change the zoning law of his district from an Rl district to a Cl business district. The Town Engineer was asked to have a topography layout showing the location for the new school house on Allen Street ready for the next meeting. Petition was received from Harriette W. smith of 164 Bedford Street which had been signed by surrounding Harriet W. owners stating that they had no objection to having the Smith landat the Corner of Vglley Road and Bedford Street Petition placed in a business zone . A letter was written Iessrs. G. F. & C. F. Smith stating that nothing further can be done until Valley Road is established as a Town Way. Mr. Daniel J. O'Connell, attorney for Ethel W. Sean, 241 Bedford street, wrote a letter to the Board Ethel t' . i3ea.ri expressing the desire of his client to have her land placed in a business zone. A letter was written him Petition saying that a petition would have to be signed by surround- ing land owners. Seeing that the last two petitions were requesting changes to be made on Bedford Street, it was decided that both hearings would be held on the same night. It was voted that people who petition for a $20 .00 change of the zoning laws must pay a fee of $20.00 . This Heating amount will go towards the cost of printing and registering Charge the mail notices of the hearings. vyith this charge, it is thought , that people will not petition these changes unless there is really something behind it . 2. Planing Board Meeting May 26, 1930 lirA petition has been received from Catherine F. Herbert to have the lot at the easterly corner of Catherine F. Mass. Avenue and Marrett Road placed in the business Herbert district . A letter was written informing her that a Petition petition must be signed by surrounding land owners and filed with a fee of 00.00. Relative to a letter of February 19, from the Selectmen, inquiry to the status of the proposed extension Sherman St . of Oakland Street through to Sherman Street and Woburn Extension Street, the Town Engineer stated that the additional information called for at the March 3rd meeting was ready and will be presented at the next meeting. Relative to a letter of February 19, from the Selectmen, asking for some date, on the Golden Guernsey Goldrnsey en Farm development, the Town engineer stated that the Levelopment owners had been told to present a development plan for approval of the Planning Board. Byater Supply Relative to a letter of May 10, from the Middlesex selectmen, asking for recommendations An the layout Hospital of the street connecting Watertown Street to Liberty Heights for additional water supply of the Middlesex Hospital, the Town Engineer stated that, while not completed, the plans may be studied at the next meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 P . M. Respectfully submitted Secretary First meeting attended - C. C. Maguire PLANNING BOARD MEETING Lexington, bass. June 3, 1930 . Present :- Emery, Milne , Duffy, Scheibe , Town Engineer, Assistant Town Engineer, and clerk. Mr. Alexander Quinn of Grant Street has asked for information on Oakland Street extension. Maps of this location were explained by Asset Town Engineer. Oakland The matter was referred to the Town Engineer to present Street at the next meeting, if possible, a layout of direct Extension extension through with profile and estimate of wall constructioh and filling and preliminary showing con- tinuously the road from nancock Street through to Woburn Street, and preliminary estimate of cost for each part of the new sections to be built. A letter was sent jur. Quinn informing him that the matter was considered at the meeting but no definite information could be given at that time . The school lot plan was discussed and examined . The Town Engineer is to furnish a sketch and data showing the widening and improvement of Allen St , from Waltham Street to Middle Street and the improve- Allen St . ment of Brookside Avenue in view of furnishing proper Improvement approaches to the proposed school house site . In studying the proposed water supply for the Middlesex County Hospital, the Planning Board believes Water it advisable at this time to consider an auxilliary at M . C. line from the Arlington Standpipe . Described in a general Hospital way, this line would follow along the Arlington-Belmont boundary line to connect with Bowman Street and/or Water- town Street continuing to Pleasant Street. The meeting was adjourned at 10:55 P . M. Respectfully submitted, Iv Clerk lir LEXINGTON PLANNING BOARD MEETING June 16, 1930 Present :- Emery, Duffy, Glynn, Cutler, Scheibe, Higgins, Clerk. A letter was read from Edith C. Smith regarding property on Marrett Road. It was turned over to the Board Edith C. of Survey and a letter was written her advising her of Smith this. A plan of the property was attached.. Catherine F. Herbert's letter and petition were read. A letter was written telling her of the hearing Cathe HerberIne F to be held Monday, July 21st, 1930 and requesting a de- posit of $20.b0 for the notice and publications. A letter and check were received from Daniel Daniel J. J. O'Connell, attorney for Mrs. `Lthel 4c. Bean. He was 0�'Corinell informed by letter of the hearing to be held Monday, July 21st, 1930 for the petition. Messrs. George F. & Charles F. Smith were in- Harriet A . formed by letter of the hearing to be held Monday, July Smith 21st, 1930 and requesting a deposit of $20.00 to cover the cost of notices and publications. It was voted unanimously to pay Mr. Shurtleff $100.00 on his bill of $378.00 for the drainage project. • letter was wi itten Mr. Gustance explaining Oakland St. the proposed layouts of Oakland Street Extention and Extension stating that the Planning Board could make no further recommendation without the data requested at the June 3rd meeting. A copy of this letter was given firs. Whittemore. The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P. M. Respectfully submitted, Clerk PLANNING BOARL HEARING July 21, 1930 • There was not a quorum of the Planning Board , Mr . Milne and Iir. Scheibe being the only members present . Mr. Milne took charge . HARRIET SMITH HEARING 8:15 - 8:30 Five appearing George F . 'smith: - Stated that his father has owned the property sixty or seventy years and has had a chance to sell if it is put into the business zone . Can't sell it for• a residence because of the business zone across the street. John J. Brady:- Non-resident but owns property on Bedford Street and North Hancock Street . Stated that he thought it would be better as a commercial district and give him a better chance to sell. Vote : - 4 in favor of change . ETHEL W. BEAN HEARING 8:30 - 9:04 13 Appearing Frank B. Culbertson: - Asked if it was going to be used for golf or for other• purposes . Mr. Chairman: - Answered that if the property was put in the business zone , no restriction could be made on the use . Lir . Gately, 40 Court St . ,Boston: - Representing Mrs . Ethel V';. Bean and Daniel J. O'Connell, stated that it was the owner ' s purpose to use the property for golf practice as is being done now. Said that the petitioner ' s purpose was to help the children at her apron strings . -2- • 111 Planning Board Hearing July 21, 1930 Bean Hearing Continued Mr. Bean: - Stated that permission had been granted them. Carl F . Asthon: -Asked if there was any danger of it being made into a bowling alley later. Mr. Chairman:- Stated that another hearing would have to be held for that . Neil McIntosh: - Stated that he didn't oppose the change if the golf balls would stay on the Bean land, but he thinks they will go on his property. If shots could be directed another way, they could not reach his land. He has no objection as it is now. Mr . Bean: - Stated that the lot was 900 feet wide where the balls were picked up, and he didn't think they would go far enough to hit the iwiclntosh land. Mr . .Pelton: - Stated that they moved there next to the Bean property away from the disturbances of the city and want the district kept residential. Vote : - 6 In favor of change 9 opposed . CATHERINE F. HERBERT HEARING 9:05 - 9 :20 5 Appearing Mr. Wm. P . Herbert : Wants to develop it so it can pay the taxes and have the town derive taxes from it . Bedros Bashian: Asked what they were going to use it for . Catherine Herbert : - Purpose is a filling station. Thinks one is needed at this place because there isn't one in that vicinity. Bedros Bashian:- Stated that he opposed it because the Bluff is a historical spot and should not be molested with a filling station. Also that the building of the new road would affect it and thinks it should wait until the road has been completed . 3/ 111 Planning Board Hearing July 21 , 1930 Herbert hearing Continued Mr. Scheibe : - Stated that he didn't think it would be surrounded with hot dog stands like the spot set aside for Paul Revere in Concord. Mrs. Herbert: - Stated that Lexington had so many historical places that it could not afford to have them all set aside as parks . It is impossible to do anything else with the land because the rest is either too swampy or or too tocky. This is the only spot they have that can be developed . It is too noisy for a residential district anyway with the trucks and cars on the State Road. Mr. Bashian stated that it should not have a filling station because it is historical but he has a historical spot on his land and is using it commercially selling corn and other vegetables . Toras h. Bashian: - Would like to know what kind of a building was to be built and cost . Mr . W . t' . Herbert:- Stated that whatever kind of a building it was, it would not be a detriment to the Town of Lexington. PLANNING BOARD MEETING September 12, 1930 8; 15 P . iYl. Present :- i•essrs. Emery, Milne, Luffy, Scheibe, Glynn, Town Engineer Cosgrove and clerk. The hearing held July 16th was discussed. It was found that the Board of Fippeals, at their meeting held Sept. 12th, were taking up the Bean petition also. The Planning Bean Board voted unanimously not to change the zoning law, the Petition reason being that there is no condition there demanding a change in zoning because the golf courses and ranges come under variations in zoning. The miniature golf courses cause traffic jams, damage surrounding residential property and are generally objected to by neighbors, but on the other hand, it is a Miniature clean, profitable game and just a fad . It is thought that Golf permits for these courses should be made yearly instead of permanently. This is going to be brought up by the Federation of Planning Boards. Two checks,received from C . E . Herbert and E . J. O 'Connell ( Bean) for 20.00 each, were turned over to the Town Treasurer. The Smith hearing was discussed. A layout of Valley Road was studied and debated . The Board opposes Harriet W. the change in zoning unless it is absolutely necessary Smith Hearing but thinks that this section is going to be a business center sometime and that the whole area should be con- sidered. if this corner along is changed , it will ''ecrease the value of the other corners. It was voted unanimously that another rearing should be held to consider the other corners. Oakland Street Extension layouts were studied Oakland St and a jn1efined by the Town Engineer. The Board decided not Extension to vote on the layout until they have some idea of the cost . If the cost of the ?resent layout is too much for the Tov'n, another one should be drawn up. A letter was written Laniel J . O 'Connell informing him that the Board Voted not to recommend the change in Bean zoning on the Bean property because there was not sufficient Hearing • need of the change . The meeting ra s adjourned at 10:30 P. h . Respectfully submitted, Clerk V PLAT NI NG BOARD iiiT.,FTI..WG October 3, 1930 8:15 P . L. Present :- Emery, Scheibe , Glynn, Cosgrove, Higgins and clerk. The business of the meeting was the discussion of the Extension of Sherman Street . It will cost 0,000.00 to move the Buckley house and buildings and restore the grounds, and $750.00 for a retaining Tall . The total estimate given by the Town Engineer was 4 9,000.00 . The Board thinks that it should be constructed through from Hancock Street to Voburn Street because traffic is not great enough for just the short distance from Oakland Street to Sherman Street . Voted: "That the Planning Board does not recommend the acceptance of any layout of the extension of Sherman Sherman Street to Oakland Street except it be in conjunction with St . Exten- the extension of Oakland Street northward to Hancock Street and the further extension of Sherman Street southward to a sicn proper luncti.on with Yoburn Street st a point northeast of the railroad ; t' t if and when such a scheme extending con- tinuously from Hancock Street to Vioburn Street be laid out, the Planning Board is in favor of the extension of Sherman Street on a substantially straight line through to Oakland Street as indicated by the dotted red lines on the Town. Engineer 's sketch map entitled " Proposed ::xtension of Sher- man Street, October 1, 1930" at an estimated outside cost given by the Town Engineer as $9,000.00 for that particular extension to include cost of construction, land damages and the moving of the Buckley house and buildings, and it is further recommended that the width of the through street from Hancock Street to Woburn Street be laid out at not less than fi_ft; feet and that the sharp reverse curve nor apparently contemplated to connect the extension of Sherman Street with oburn Street at the point designated should be eliminated if practicable ." A letter was written George F. & Charles F. Smith Geo & Chas asking for the check that was ro Sue sted June 19, 1930. for Smith the hearing July 21, 1930. (Harriet ) A letter was written i,ir. Ernest R. Rowland, Lowell Street asking for a check of t20.00 to cover the expenses of ErnestE . a hearing. Rowland letter was written D. J . O 'Connell stating that the Plsnning Board refused to recommend the change and it Bean 111 wss his right to ask for an article in the Town '`arrant to petition see if the Town would vote to recommend the change . Planning Board Report October 3, 1930 A letter was written =%yrs. Ellen Spencer asking for Fllen a plan showing the location of the land in question and a check of $20.00 to cover expenses of a hearing. Spencer The meeting adjourned at 9;1;30 P . M. Respectfully submitted, Clerk PLANNING BOARL HEARING October 20,1930 8:15 - 9:OOP. M. . "For consideration of the proposal to change from an R1 District to a Cl District the lots of land located at the south- west corner of the junction of Bedford Street and Valley Road and also at the southeast corner of the junction of Bedford Street & North Hancock Street." Mr. Emery took charge and explained that the Planning Board was inclined to think that if the Smith property is put in- to the Business District, the other corners should be changed also. Mr. Edward A. Meade:- 15 North Hancock Street. When he bought the property last July, he nicked this neighbor- hood because he thought it was a nice, quiet residential section. Wants it kept so. There is enough element of danger in the traffic at this point without more stores. 'lo put up stores now would decrease the valuation of his property. He does not see the need -of more stores. There are two stores vacant in the Manor Crescent for some time. Mr. J. J . Brady:- Nonresident, lives in Lowell but owns land on. Bedford Street across from Coal Company yard. Feels that there are a lot of residential districts and wants this section made business. He does not think it is residential because of the coal yards in front of his lot. Had chance to sell but people refused because of coal yard opposite. Stated that Yr. Meade would be far enough away from the stores if any were built. Mr. E. A. Meade:- Said Mr. Brady stated that he , Mr. Meade, would be far enough away from the stores. If the stores were built on the Parks property, he would be abutting them. Objects very strongly. Mr. Thomas Kelly:- Bedford Street next to Parks property towards Town. Has discussed the matter with Mr. Parks about zoning and found that he also thought a residential district at this locality was out of place. This section was zoned by the Town as residential but Burrill ' s property opposite the North Lexington Station is not residential and the Railroad property is residential. There are various demands for business there at that corner. Has had an offer for the property in the lot south of where he lives if it were a business district . The people wanted a tearoom. The offer was far beyond the value now. The land is too high for a residential district. When the street was constructed, it was lowered. People don't want to climb stairs to their residence. It would cost a lot to remove the earth to make it level with the street. II rAbout 20 feet of Burrili ' s property, 100 feet along the brook and 30 feet along the railroad is not very much like residential property: Mr. Emery: - Stated that there is 250 feet of North Hancock Street and 200 feet of Bedford Street in the business zone. Asked Mr. Kelly if he didn't think that would accomodate a tearoom. Mr. Kelly:- Replied that it wouldn 't take care of it and that it should all be rezoned and put into the business zone . It has got to come eventually. It is not desirable to build houses in the near vicinity of a coal yard or railroad. Mr. E. A. Meade : - Stated that two stores in the Manor Crescent would not be unoccupied for over two years if there is such a demand for business. Mr. E. F. Scheibe :- Stated that he built a house for his foreman, Ernest LaRose, on Harding Road and that Mr. LaRose and his neighbors were opposed to the change. Mr. Thomas Kelly:- Askedwhy there should be objections from the outskirts of this section. It has got to be turned into a commercial district sooner or later for the best interests of the Town because 1111 they get more out of it. The stores in the Manor Crescent are not suitable for bunisess and could not be rented for business. One was made into a lunch room and the other was an office. Mr. hichards got these stores without a hearing from the people. Mr. Edward W. Ormond: - 10 North Hancock Street . In in the grocery business on North Hancock Street. Has been in business in Lexington twenty years. Thinks there is no more demand for any kind of stores at this place. Is opposed because he thinks there is enough business there. People have tried tea- rooms there several times. At present there is a gasoline station, First National Store, a periodical shop and his grocery store . The periodical shop was a drug store but couldn't make it pay. There is always a gang hanging around the gasoline station. Mr. Thomas Kelly: - Bought his property thirteen years ago and did not hear about a coal yard at the time. Stated that if Smith's corner is not changed, the other corners should not be changed . Has talked with kr. Parks and Mr. Dempsey and neither one wanted to appear for or against the change. Mr. Brady: - Thinks it ought to be changed into a business district because of the coal yard and gas station already there. Thinks lower end of Bedford Street should be put into the business zone anyway. III lir Mr. Ormond: - Stated that Mr. Brady could have lower end of Bedford Street put into business zone. iuir. J . J. Brady:- Asked Mr. Winery to consider putting the lower• end of Bedford. Street from the Railroad up 80 feet and from Dix' s•line up into the business zone anyway. Would like whole frontage if possible but if not possible, would like 80 feet out of 310 feet. Would be used for tea- room. Mr. Ormond and Mr. Meade - opposed • Mr. Kelly and Mr. Brady - in favor PLANNING BOARD MEETING November 3, 1930 8:15-10:OOP.M. Present:- Emery, Cutler, Milne, DOffy, Town Engineer and Asst Town Engineer, and secretary. Mr. Higgins, Assistant Town Engineer, spoke about the meeting in Arlington regarding the "Spring Street Project". It was traced at the Arlington meeting on aerial photographs. They are going to call a hearing from all three towns that Spring St are interested and. have Mr. Kendall from the County to talk Project over further about the location. This street will take the traffic out of Belmont and Watertown Centers. The Planning Board thought that it should find out more about it before going to the hearing. There are three possible routes. It was decided to ask the Town Engineer to make preliminary sketches, showing ways of bringing the extension into Lexington and joining it to the State Road or Concord Avenue. Sketches, if possible, to be presented to the Planning Board before the proposed further hearing that is to be held,at which the County and. State Engineers are askedto be present. The three petitions were brought up:- Catherine F. Herbert:- From the point in question at Marrett Road and Mass. Avenue to the nearest filling station in Lincoln is eight-tenths of a mile and it is eight- tenths of a mile to the Five Forks Filling Station. This is a busy corner with a lot of traffic from Concord and if a filling station was put there, it would make it a congested district. Changes should not be made unless it is for good, solid. business. Harriet W. Smith:- No demand for business. If there is no demand, the Town cannot be improved by putting this district into the business zone. A business zone that is not prosperous is a detriment to the Town. There is only a mile and eight-tenths between filling stations. It would depreciate the value of the property on the other corners and make the section undesirable for residents. When there is more demand, all corners should be put in. If the Town votes to put this corner in, it ought to decide about other corners also. If the change is made, it will mean a spotty, cheap business district because the people who build won't be able to put up good buildings, and the Town will be the sufferer. Ethel N. Bean:- All agreed that there is no need of change. It was voted that changes for all three petitions 111 were unnecessary. The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P. M. r <;e Respectfully submitted, • Secretary PLANNING BOARD MEETING December 8, 1930 Present :- Messrs. Duffy, Glynn, Scheibe, Higgins and Clerk. Mr. Duffy took charge of the meeting. A new petition was received from Catherine F. Catherine F. Herbert asking to have her property at the corner of Bass. Herbert Avenue and Marrett Road put into a business district. This petition was on the warrant for the Town Meeting held November Petition 7, 1930. At this Town Meeting, Mr. Emery read report of the Planning Board and on the motion of Mr. Wrightington, it was indefinitely postponed. A letter was received from the State Dept. of Billboards Public Works regarding renewal of license for maintenance or the billboard on Mass. Avenue near Bow Street. It stated that a letter had been received and was filed with the other papers concerning this matter. The matter is to be brought up a year from now. The Spencer-Crowley petition was indefinitely post- Spencer-. poned because there had been no reply to our letter of Oct. 6th. Crowley Petition The Ernest Rowland petition was brought up. His $20.00 was received November 3rd. A letter was written him asking for a Petition signed by 50% of the valuation of the property affected. He was also informed that upon receipt Ernest R . of the signed petition, the Board will select a time for the Rowland hegring. A letter from Daniel J. O'Connell, dated Sept.22nd, , asking for information regarding Bean hearing was brought up. Ethel W. The Bean petition was on the warrant for the Town Meeting Bean hold November 7, 1930. The article was taken up and the report of the Planning Board read by Yr. Emery. Mr. Bean read the article on the warrant and made a motion of it. A rising vote was taken on the motion, 55 voting in the affirmative and 27 in the negative. The Moderator declared the motion carried by a two -thirds vote. The Board voted to pay a bill from the Mass. Federation of Planning Boafds for $15.00. The balance of the approprigtion after this bill was paid is $240.00. A letter was receivedfrom the Selectmen regarding property between Mass. Avenue and. Locust Avenue formerly owned James h. by Fred H. Moulton and which now belongs to James R. Smith. Smith Mr. Joyce, engineer for Mr. Smith, was present with the plans of the layout and explained them. Plans were left with the Developmen • Planning Board Meeting December 8, 1930 Ir . Town Engineer for him to study the layout for connecting roads between the development and Marrett Road and Follen Foad. He is to report to the Board when he has completed the study and then they will hold a meeting. It was decided that Mr. Duffy would appear at the Selectmen' s Meeting, Tuesday, Decembet 9, regarding Lincoln Street layout. The meeting was adjourned at 9:40 P. Y. Respectfully submitted, Secretary tuber 31, 1230 taring the first three months of the gear, the time of the Planning Board was given almost exclusively to the Lielsotmen in connection with the project at draining the Vine Brook area. This inportant work hall been earlier areae ended by the Abenning Boar to the Celeotmea and was urged energetically by the latter for adoption bythe Town* ikasti were held the Planning Jo * weeky and trebly twieee a week - conferences were had with represents* tives of Messrs. Be It hliddy and with the Town Engineer and hearings were granted. An extended oral report wee color by the Charman of the Planning Board at the session held on the evening of March 31, 19ao. The• Town referred the matter bsok and called for a printed report, Tnis eae furnished the voters and on May lgth, the matter came up again at which tire it was defeated* At an �ad omeeting held J ninth, the whole matter was referred to a °Weans, committee which has sine* given further and careful consideration of this subject and will doubtless suint its report with racommenda. tions at an early date. It is hoped that such report will at least rec©nond that a beginning be mace upon this toportattnt projects for, in the opinion of the planning Board, no more important matter foes consideration by the Teens Beginning with the early summers the work of the naming mrd this last year has been very largely in action with petitions for changes in coning,, all, with one exception, seeking changes from residential to business areas. Bolding the Town to a systematic growth nay at tiles cense apparent individual hardship,, but the 'tanning a rd must, at aal?. times, work for the general good and endeavors to keep this in wind i,n making its recommendations* early in the years the Board adopted a resolution requiring all petitions for chs in coning to be accompanied by a tee of .00. This is to corers so far es possible, the cost of public notice of hearing In the loaeal paper Mod of serving such notice upon the property owners in the vicinity of the Change petitioned for. .42 a rule, these notion,* number fifty or more end mutst, under ruling of the ; , mnsels be Bent by rr`jstered sail. V .2.w The eject of widening Lincoln Ctroet was carried throw on a piss► that it would provide work for the outer- wise unemployed but it did not need with the approval of the -leaning .aoard in fest, it wee earned through in public mooting without having b referred to the :71anning . substitution layout for this prosect conforming to carefully laid plans made by Mr. surtaliff in connection with the Vine crook project seams more suitable to tilt, majority of the nanning Board n bore. This s secloud plans son a rvos all our park arse, does sway with some .loavr told asPansiva rook cutting, saves 100 fine tress and eltr nates two curves. am) the widening and rebuilding of L asst chusetts Avenue over Lioncor d Lill, theta would aeon to be little need of laying out truth teen*►:. on Lincoln Street at this ti¢.e. The extension of ;Sherman Street to Oakland parallel with the railroad on the north aide :has oocup .od c.>nst.!erablo tires The °?iatniing Board does not favor this develoomont until there it, rote urgent need than et rosent and not then unless the extension ' s carried throe ,,- to satisfactory tion with 'coburn dtr.et* This would give a certain amount of relief from traffic passing through the center of the Town and right in tiro be justified it the elm ewer be not too iyeeat. over*? joint meettnes have been hold with the Arlington and Belront naming Boards regarding the spring street project .. a conneotion free Fresh :ond ?arkway near tteb railroad bridge skirting the south end of Spy :and crossing :'leasant Street and over tho hill to connect with Concord Avenue in Lexington near the . eniteriums This proposed road would be praottaable aad would avoid eon jestion in Arlington Centre, Belmont and, with Concord AMMO widened as it should be, would care for much traffic now using lass. 'Avec rue. s trees maks a groat pant of the beauty of our Town. t'he ?laming :3oard in discussing proposed reel estate dsvelomits aro considering the advisability of resorving an additional five Bret on either std of the usual street *novenae for tree planting. . er haps some require, ter t as to pleating along street lines could be 'lades r few years will mak* a aa't different" in the erklearence and in the value of the lots offend, and the first cost would be merely ruminal. I «►fir., Following is a list of e to of the items that have concerned your Joard, which have be,:n gone over ogre fullyduring the past years.. Lc Levis on ,r the Guernsey 3sr' Laid. =:e-ssontng at Valley Peed # Bedford Streets e-.soning of George Xs Sean F-ro „tyI an Bedfore *'t., ,re.zoning of property . oburu tt. and fletrh• twee., eis - ' el` ert "-o,erty GU SUS* AIM= east Starrett at=ion of water connections fro= tatert to Liberty Haight* end auxiliary water linen from Arlington StaneThe question of niniature golf courses see also Wien cl is°fegracb;t, i and is not ;het fully settled. III All serha r of the i'lanning Board are busy men ,rsa0 ere obliged to rketlee many eocrifioea of business for the work of the Begird, rurtng the nest yeer, It has see wort difficult than usual to find the necessary tire for n work and *absences from teen have been frequent. rase ',Alairman has been +blued to ebserst himself for nearly three 'meatball. :t is hopee that thee, interruptions may not con- tinue ung the oaring year. 1estpseetfully sUbmittee, U ir^*an 1.4. rk 1 . i Zi • • too 0,0" 1 ,;a - ay • 3