HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-11-08-PDMC-rpt.pdf .e
fifIlY
TOWN OF LEYINCTON
Police Department Manual Committee
The Police Department Manual Committee hereby submits its first re-
port to the Board of Selectmen
The Committee met for organizational purposes on July 20, 1976 and
has held seven meetings since that date At the outset we reviewed the
current manual, designated in the Rules and Regulations of the Police De-
partment approved by the Board of Selectmen and the Town Manager in 1972
These Rules and Regulations, prepared by the Chief of. Police represent a
revision of the 1943 version The Committee also reviewed a substantial
number of other communications between the Chief and the Department con-
cerning the functioning of. the Department and the performance of duties by
its officers These consist of bulletins, directives and general orders
The Committee considered at length difficult questions concerning the
nature and function of the manual what ought to be in it and what ought to
be omitted, what ourght to be prescribed by the Board of Selectmen or the
Town Manager, and what falls within the responsibility of the Chief of Police
We came to recognize the need for guidelines on the one hand and, on the other,
the dangers inherent in their becoming too specific or too voluminous
Both the case for guidelines and recognition of their limits have been
set forth by the Chief Justice of the United States , Warren E Burger, in an
address to local and state police administrators upon their graduation from
the FBI Academy
It is often overlooked that no public officials in the
entire range of modern government are given such wide dis-
cretion on matters dealing with the daily lives of citizens
as are police officers In the broad terms of public admin-
istration, I think it would be a safe assumption that the
scope of discretion enlarges as we look upward in the hier-
archy of government In other words, the higher the rank,
the greater is the discretion But this is not true in po-
lice work. The policeman on the beat, or in the patrol car,
makes more decisions and exercises broader discretion affecting
the daily lives of people, every day and to a greater extent,
in many respects, than a judge will ordinarily exercise in a
week
No law book, no lawyer, no judge can really tell the police-
man on the beat how to exercise this discretion perfectly in every
one of the thousands of different situations that can arise in the
hour-to-hour work of the policeman Yet we must recognize that
we need not choose between no guidelines at all and perfect guide-
lines There must he some guidance by way of basic concepts that
will assist the officer in these circumstances
p
ti
-2-
Basically, as I suggested, it is a matter of common sense
and sound judgment, and yet we know that one man's common sense
may be another man's mistake Hence this need for carefully
devised basic standards to guide the exercise of this discretion
and, second, for carefuland comprehensive training of officers
before they are thrust into situations that would often baffle
the wisest judge
The modern police manual contains three sections I, Rules and Regula-
tions; II, Job Descriptions; III , Policy and Procedures Statements Rules
and Regulations set forth instructions binding upon members of the Department
They are categorical, precise, and are of such a nature that violation may
lead to disciplinary action. The term "Job Descriptions" is self-explanatory
These first two sections of the manual are appropriately promulgated by town
officials, by the Town Manager or the Board of Selectmen, or, as we prefer, by
both The Policy and Procedures section of the manual consists of a series of
statements on a variety of topics designed to guide the officer in the conduct
of his duty We emphasize that they are guidelines They are the products of
much thought and deliberation most summarize the factors rendering the topic
important each represents a statement of general policy as to how particular
situations ought to be handled They all rest upon an assumption, however,
that circumstances may and will arise in which a particular policy or procedure
must yield to the exigencies of the situation and in which there is no substi-
tute for the judgment of the officer on the spot recause the Policy and Pro-
cedures statements are in essence working documents, they should be promulgated
by the official responsible for the operation of the Department, namely the
Chief of Police
Although the Committee had grappled with these concepts for some time, the
nomenclature and views set forth above crystallized only after our meeting with
representatives of the Massachusetts Police Institute on September 28 Because
the Institute plays a major role under the recommendations which follow, a
brief description seems appropriate The Massachusetts Police Institute (MPI)
is a service agency affiliated with the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Associa-
tion It provides technical assistance to police departments in the Commonwealth
It is federally funded by the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration It
renders services only upon request of a police chief, hence it was at Chief
Corr's invitation that representatives of the Institute met with us PPI renders
technical assistance in a number of areas , including the preparation of Police
Department Manuals The Institute has prepared a series of monographs These
are the statements of Policy and Procedures, subject to local adaptation This
Committee has examined these monographs, currently 24 in number Among the more
significant topics covered are arrest, crowds and demonstrations, juveniles,
high-speed pursuit, rape, stop and frisk, use of force, strikes, and search and
seizure The Institute keeps these monographs under constant review; amendments
are made from time to time Chief Corr has stressed that all of the matters in-
cluded within the 24 monographs are vitally important to the proper operation of
the Police Department, and the Committee is quite persuaded that this is so
Additional topics may well qualify for inclusion
N
-3-
We now come to our conclusions and recommendations In our judgment
obtaining the assistance of the Institute represents the soundest approach
to commencement of a continuing review of the Police Department manual
Such an approach already has been adopted by numerous other communities
Chief Corr stands ready to request such assistance The representatives of
MPI who met with the Committee, Mr Thomas F O'Connor, former Chief of Po-
lice of Holyoke, and Attorney John M. Collins, expressed their opinion that
the present Rules and Regulations of the Lexington Police Department (in-
cluding the Job Descriptions) are in exceedingly good condition, amon_n
best that they have encountered in Massachusetts tOur Rules and Regulations
do contain matter which under the MPI approach would be placed in the section
on Policy and Procedures The project we propose would involve a review of
the Rules and Regulations, editing out those matters to he placed in Section
III The Policy and Procedures statements would then become a part of the
manual, distinguished from the first two sections in that these statements
would be promulgated by the Chief of Police, with Sections I and II to be
adopted by the Town Manager, the Board of Selectmen, or botJ
We believe that it is important that members of the Department participate
in this process For one thing, any amendments constituting a change in working
conditions become the subject of collective bargaining As important is the
proposition that if the product is to work well those who must use it should
play a part in determining its content
We believe that a committee of citizens such as ours can continue to be
helpful It should review the recommendations of MPI and serve as an advisory
committee to the Chief as to the entire manual and to the Town Manager and the
Board of Selectmen as to Sections I and II
We believe that the cost of this proposal is very modest The Institute
does not at present charge for its services, other than for reproduction of
materials We do not believe that a large number of copies is necessary An
adequate supply for the Department, copies for the Town Manager, the Board of
Selectmen, and members of a committee such as this would be needed In ad-
dition copies should be made available for public inspection at convenient
locations such as Cary Library We do not believe that a general public dis-
tribution is called for; this is an operation document We do think that
public access to it is essential
In closing we would express the hope that neither the Board nor the Towns-
people will overemphasize the importance of the manual Most of what the of-
ficer learns about performance of his duties he learns from other sources, such
as his substantial training upon joining the force, the courses which he takes,
the material which he reads Above all he must be educated by his experience
We do believe that an expanded manual can contribute useful guidelines for the
exercise of the police function. We believe that statement of guidelines and
the existence of a process for their continuous review can contribute to that
public confidence so essential to the ultimate success of the Department
Respectfully submitted
Alexander J Cella Leroy Keith
Hugh M Chapin Irving H Mabee
James F Corr Robert B Kent, Chairman
William C Hays