HomeMy WebLinkAbout1951-08-20-min 537
SELECTMEN'S MEETING
August 20, 1951
A regular meeting of the Board of Selectmen was
held in the Selectmen's Room, Town Office Building on
Monday evening at 7:00 P.M. Chairman Nickerson,
Messrs. Emery,Gay, Driscoll and Hoyt were present.
Mr. Burns, Supt of Public Works, and the Clerk were
also present.
Miss McDonough, Assistant Town Clerk, met with
the Board for the drawing of two jurors. Matthew A.
Macauley, civil engineer, 490 Waltham Street and Jurors
Robert N. Cann, salesman, 1956 Massachusetts Avenue,
were drawn to serve in Cambridge beginning the first
Monday in October.
Hearing was declared open upon the petition of
the New England Telephone and Telegraph Company for
permission to lay and maintain underground conduits
and manholes, with wires and cables to be placed
therein, under the surface of the following public
way:
Massachusetts Avenue : easterly side,
from manhole 54/23 opposite Locust
Avenue, southerly southwesterly and Conduit
southeasterly to manhole 54/32, location
approximately 2820 feet.
No persons were present at the hearing in favor
or in opposition to the petition.
Due to the fact that the Board preferred to
discuss the subject with a representative of the
Company before taking action, the Chairman was
authorized to make an appointment for the next
meeting of the Board.
Petition was received from the Boston Edison
Company and the New England Telephone Company for per-
mission to relocate existing poles on North Street.
No persons were present in favor or in opposition
to the petition.
Upon motion of Mr. Emery, seconded by Mr. Driscoll
it was voted to approve the petition and sign the order pole
for the following pole locations1 locations
North Street, southeasterly from a
point approximately 540 feet south-
' east of Burlington Street - Five
(5) poles.
North Street, approximately 2,495
feet northwest of Adams Street,
One (1) pole.
Misting locations. No new locations desired).
538
Petition was received from the Boston Edison Company
and the New England Telephone Company for permission to
locate one pole on Revere Street.
Pole Mr. C. Henry Jackson was the only person present
Location at the hearing. A plan showing the proposed location
was explained by Mr. Burns, the Town Engineer, and Mr.
Jackson informed the Board that he has no objections.
He retired at 7 :25 P.M.
Upon motion of Mr. Hoyt seconded by Mr. Driscoll,
it was voted to approve the petition and sign the order
for the following pole locations:
Revere Street, northwesterly side,
approximately 575 feet southwest
of Hancock Street
Mr. William H. Ballard met with the Board and Mr.
Burns presented a 20' scale plan of proposed Edison
Way, showing a 32t pavement, 3' shoulders on the side
of the properties. He explained that the shoulders are
shown on the plan because it will be necessary to keep
water from running off the pavement onto the land. The
plan also showed a sidewalk on the far side and Mr. Burns
explained it is to give people means of getting, in and
also to provide area for light poles.
Mr. Burns explained that he did not show a fence
on the railroad side but did show the parking area,
two-way traffic in and out of Depot Square to the
Boston & Maine parking area; moved O'Connell's fence
and showed relocated position and retaining wall as a
safety measure. The wall, although shown on the plan,
may not be necessary when the work is actually done.
The plan also showed proposed drainage. Mr. Burns
said that he would be pleased to put on any additional
items which might be suggested.
Edison Mr. Ballard said that he ,thought an 8' sidewalk
Way was rather generous when a street is needed more than
a sidewalk. He said, however, that this is the type
of plan that he would like to present to the Boston &
Maine and the property owners. He said that he would
be glad to proceed on the assumption that the Board
will obtain the approval of the Planning Board, and he
would be glad to help, and he would get the approval
of the Boston & Maine and these people who previously
thought that the Town would act on it at a meeting.
The Chairman asked if he meant that he would
proceed with the negotiations and Mr. Ballard replied that
he would just carry the negotiations further on. He said
that it had been suggested that it be presented to Town
Meeting, but all he is suggesting is to go ahead with
everything all at once. He said that when this plan is
approved tentatively by the Board he will be glad to
prepare a short brief as to the points, which. the Board
can have. He said that if a copy of the plan and the
brief could be sent to the Planning Board it might help
crystalize their ideas, and with the Boards approval, the
project can be ready for the next Town Meeting whenever it
is .
53
Mr. Ballard asked if the Board had decided on the
next Town Meeting and the Chairman said that the Board
' hoped this would be ready again next March without any
difference of opinion.
Mr. Ballard said that he hoped this would be ready
for March and suggested that possibly a Town Meeting
may be held in the Fall. He said that he would not call
a meeting for this project, but would like to have it
ready in the event a special meeting is held, because the
people involved might change their minds.
The Chairman said that he presumed the Planning
Board would advise the Selectmen next Monday night if
they have made any progress on the subject.
The Chairman asked if, with the exception of the
termination location of the fence and the fact that
possibly the sidewalk width is to wide, this plan in
general met with Mr. Ballard 's anticipated layout and
he replied in the affirmative.
The Chairman said that the Board would arrive at
some conclusion quickly and be in touch with Mr. Bal-
lard.
Mr. Burns asked if there was anything further that
Mr. Ballard wanted on the plan and he replied that he
would like to have the grades.
Mr. Burns agreed to put on the center line, show
the owners and send Mr. Ballard three copies of the
plan.
After Mr. Ballard had left the meeting, the Board
agreed to reduce the width of the sidewalk from eight
feet to five feet and also make a note on the plan that
the fence is to be determined.
Mr. Ballard then discussed briefly the Scott
property and said that the Town Counsel sent him a
draft of the proposed offer from Scott and he returned
it with two or three suggestions. He said that he was
surprised to learn that the Board was going to agree
that future assessments were going to be this or that
and that is the reason he desired help from the Town
Counsel. He said that it is not possible to do some
of the points asked for and he would like the Town
Counsel' s decision. He said that after the Board and Scott
Town Counsel have gone over the draft he would like an proposal
opportunity to look it over.
The Chairman asked if Mr. Ballard desired to dis-
cuss the various points this evening and he replied in
the negative, stating that he thought it comes down to
what can and what cannot be done, and that he will be
satisfied with Mr. Stevens ' recommendations.
The Chairman said that the Board would ask Mr.
Stevens for his opinion and he in turn would contact
Mr. Ballard.
Mr. Ballard referred to the subject of the Wood-
land Bird Sanctuary and explained that there are three Woodland
trustees and it may take sometime to obtain their signa- Bird
tures on a release. He said he could see no reason why Sanctuary
the release could not be drawn and that when it is a release
ready he .will, send IA to ,the trustees, together with a
-Plan'ror their signatures.
540 CC
Mr. Ballard retired at 7:40 P.M. and Mr. Stevens
arrived at the meeting at 7 :45 P.M.
The Chairman suggested, and the Town Counsel
agreed, that they meet with Mr. Ballard on Wednesday
to go over the Scott proposal.
Mr. Stevens reported that, with reference to the
Sit. of Kelchester property, there is some question of the
timeon title, and explained that he had prepared a document
Kelchester for time extension, leaving the specific date blank
property for the moment.
Upon motion of Mr. Emery, seconded by Mr. Hoyt,
it was voted to sign the Extension of Time and Further
Agreement prepared by Town Counsel. (Mr. Stevens took
the signed form).
Mr. Stevens explained that the contracts between the
Town and Cali were ready. He recommended that the Board
sign them and give them to him. He will not approve them
Cali until the insurance certificates are all in proper form.
contract Upon motion of Mr. Hoyt, seconded by Mr. Driscoll,
it was voted to sign the contract and deliver it to Mr.
Stevens as suggested by him.
Letter was received from Edwin A. Cheney, attorney
for Sven H. and Virginia R. Nielsen. The Nielson's are
owners of land formerly owned by Owen McDevitt, et als
Partial and desire a partial release of water betterment assess-
release ments in the amount of $727.96 for a water main in
of Burlington Street.
water Mr. Stevens explained the situation and upon motion
assess- of Mr. Emery, seconded by Mr. Gay, it was voted to sign
ment the Partial Release of Land From Water Betterment Assess-
ment form prepared by Town Counsel.
Letter was received from the Town Clerk, together with
Johnson a copy of the County Commissioners' order for layout of
Road Johnson Road.
Upon motion of Mr. Emery, seconded by Mr. Hoyt, it was
voted to request the Superintendent of Public Works to re-
present the Board at the hearing, and to authorize him to
record the Board as being in favor of the proposed layout.
Mr. Stevens discussed the claim for damages presented
by Norman A. Downs, as a result of an accident involving
Downs ? his car and Town Sweeper. He stated that, in his opinion,
Claim there is no responsibility on the part of the Town.
The Board authorized Mr. Stevens to advise Mr. Dawns
of his opinion.
Mr. Stevens reported on the Pazzano claim for damages
as a result of an accident involving Mrs. Pazzano?s car and
Pazzano?s a Town truck. He said that from the facts presented, the
Claim Town should deny liability. However, Mr. Driscoll said that
he felt very definitely therewas negligence on the part of
the operator of the Town Truck.
6_
541
Mr. Stevens is to report further at the next
meeting of the Board.
Messrs. Stevens and Burns retired at 8:50 P.M.
Chief John W. Rycroft of the Police Department
met with the Board.
The Chairman explained that there are a number
of things the Board would like to discuss and
mentioned a Civil Service examination. He asked if the Civil
Chief had determined what the timing should be. Service
Chief Rycroft stated that the Division will hold Exam.
an examination in February with the proviso that if in
December, when it checks the cities and towns it may be
determined to hold a State-wide examination in March and
therefore the Lexington examination will be deferred until
March. He said that this would be all right. There were
two men to take the examination. One man severely injured
his knee while playing ball and it may be held up for him.
However, the injury may be a permanent one and he may
never be able to take the examination.
The Chairman asked if the Chief would like to have
a formal application made now for a Civil Service exam-
ination for police officers for February with the under-
standing that it will give him plenty of time to get the
applicants lined up and the Chief replied in the affirma-
tive.
11
The Chairman said that the Board has been endeavor-
ing to prevent the extension of gravel pits around the
Town and explained that it is definitely against the
law to enlarge gravel pits and that no permission has
been given anyone or can be given anyone to enlarge the
pits. He said that the police are around town and are Gravel
in the most stragetic position of anyone to catch such Pits
things when they first start. He said that the Board
would appreciate it very much if the Police Department
would report to the Chairman, any member of the Board
or Town Counsel, preferably, if any sand or gravel pit
is being enlarged.
The Chairman said that the third item for discuss-
ion is that in line with the effort that the Board is
considering making toward a 40 hour week for the Police
Department,. He explained that little or no progress has
been made as far as anything definite is concerned, but
that the Board has spent a lot of time discussing the Police
matter and pondering how it can be done. 40 hour
He- said that the Chief knows that he has only week
one possibility for a new officer and also that he
is faced with the possibility of losing an officer.
He explained that the Board has considered the
matter of temporary employees -- school crossing
people and in spite of the fact of his conversation
early in March with the Chief, the Chief was very
definitely against temporary employees. He said that the
Board has looked into the matter of women police officers
in Newton and Melrose and has found, from a rather thorough
study of the situation in Newton , that they are very
542
mtZ
satisfactory. He said that with women police officers
for school duty, the Department would definitely pick
up a lot of hours, enouel so that with two new men the
40 hour week could be put in force. He said that the
Board believes, not having scheduled it out, that by
taking the number of hours that would be acquired by
this method, enough hours could be assembled to bring
the force down to a 40 hour week.
The Chief asked what the Chairman meant by using
substitutes, and the Chairman explained that he meant
by using women on the school crossings in the morning,
and at noon and at the grade schools in the afternoon.
He said that the Chief has two men at the High 8chool
in the morning.
The Chief said that one man goes to the Fletcher
Avenue crossing and the other goes to Munroe School
at 8:10
The Chairman asked if the pair of men do three
jobs in the morning and the Chief replied that they do
two different jobs, which is four jobs each. He has
one man at Adams School and one at Oak Street who do
just one job. There are no officers at the Franklin or
Fiske Schools, but there is one at Parker School and
one at Massachusetts Avenue for the Hancock School. He
explained that at noon there are six men on school duty;
at 3 :30 there are six men on school duty and the cruiser
does the High School at 2:05. He said that in the
morning the men are at the schools from 8:00 until 8:45
and at noon from 11:25 to 12:10. They are back again
at 12:45 until 1:15. The Chief stated that each man is
doing three hours and six men working is 18 hours, not
including transportation.
Police The Chairman said that, in other words, the Chief
40 hour has something like 20 hours a day, 4 days a week, or
week 80 hours a week of this type of duty and the Chief
agreed.
The Chairman said that at the present time it is
permissable to employ retired people overage. He said
that if the Chief could find some retired officer or
retired capable person who could perform duties to give
him a little aid, he might gain some hours that way
The Chairman said that the Board would like the
Chief to put his mind to this problem from the stand-
point of seeing if he can figure out a schedule that
will work toward this end. He stated that the Board
is not in a position to say that it is going to force
this on the Chief but would like him to consider it.
The Chief said that the idea of using police women
in Newton was due to this fact. It took so many men
every day that they had to call night men back to over-
time school duty during the day and it became an issue.
He explained that they did not need more men on ,days to
cover the assignments except hours for schools so to
overcome it, they put on women and it worked well .
543
He said that if, in Lexington, three men are taken off
day shift and three women are put on schools, they will
take school traffic but there will not be the men to cover
the regular assignments. He said that the force will be
cut down days so the the normal work will not be done.
The Chairman said that the Department wants a 40-
hour week and asked why the men couldn' t be doing some-
thing else while the women were doing crossings.
The Chief said that in order to put in a 40-hour
week, he will have to change men off days where the
schools are being taken care of and put them on nights.
When the schools are done, three women have gone home so
three of the manpower are left. He said that if he had
enough men to cover the assignments, women would be all
right.
The Chairman said that there are just so many things
to be done and so many officers to do them and they work
48 hours a week.
The Chief said that they are working almost 60 hours
a week. He said that the night men work from quarter to
six until quarter to one, quarter of one until quarter of
eight. These two night shifts take care of 14 hours.
The other 10 hours are taken care of by day men.
The Chairman asked the Chief if he could reshuffle
his schedule if he had 80 hours a week more, to get the
real benefit from those 80 extra hours, by decreasing
the hours that the officers Would have to work.
Mr. Hoyt asked if the Chief' s coverage at the time
Police
of schools was being penalized when he has six men on 40-hour
crossings and he replied that there is no question about week
it.
Mr. Hoyt asked if he could use those men if they
were not on school crossings and the Chief replied in
the affirmative. He said that he could not shorten the
days of the week until he has three extra men.
Mr. Hoyt said that the men would not be sitting
around doing nothing if the Department had auxiliary help
and the Chief said that was right. He said that usually,
in the summer time, he has to send out one or two officers
a day with the Public Works Department and 25% of his
department is out on something unforseen. He has two men
on the cruiser and finds now that very often he has to send
the second cruiser out to answer calls. He stated that
the Town is growing and one car can' t take care of all the
calls coming in.
The Chief said that he would be glad to think this
over and see if he can work something out. He said that
he knows the Melrose and Newton situation and it is good
if manpower is available for the rest of the business
of the Department.
Mr. Driscoll asked how many men were on days and the
Chief replied that there are twelve .
Mr. Driscoll asked howl, many men were on nights and
the Chief replied twelve.
544
cin
Mr. Driscoll asked if he needed as many on days
as he does on nights and the Chief replied that he
does because of the schools. He explained that some-
one is off every six days. There are four men off
every day -- two day men and two night men. He said
that the same thing is true when the Department in-
creases, so does the sick leave. There are more men
to be sick. He said that the men in his Department
will work if they can and there is no shirking. The
Chief said that with the number of men in the Depart-
ment, there is no safety factor whatsoever to take care
of sickness . He explained that during the summer vaca-
tions must be between June 21st and September 4th which
means that every two weeks four men are on vacation, plus
the men ,on days off. At the present time there are six
men on days, not including the Chief.
The Chairman asked if, in view of the questions asked,
the statements he has made and the answers by the Chief,
the Board felt it should ask him to proceed with a study
to see if he could utilize a possible 80 hours of women
officers to help toward the five-day week.
Mr. Driscoll asked if the Chief had talked to them
in Newton, and the Chief replied that he has talked with
the Newton Chief many times.
Mr. Driscoll said that Newton is asking for more
women officers this year.
The Chief said that Lexington is trying to do some-
thing different than they are in Newton.
He said that Lexington is trying to create a five-
day week and the women in Newton were not put on to
create a five-day week as the men already had it.
The Chairman asked if anyone wanted to make any
comment on his question of a few minutes ago or if they
thought the Chief' s answer to the situation has changed
the Board' s mind.
Mr. Driscoll said that, in other words, the Chief
is to mull this over and see if he can or can' t make up
some hours.
The Chairman said that the Board thought it would
be the thing to do to ask him in and lay this matter
before him to see if he could reschedule his grouping
to gain an advantage from a possible 80 hours of add-
itional employees. Now the Chief has stated very clearly
that it would not solve his situation.
Mr. Driscoll asked how Melrose compared with
Lexington and the Chief replied that he was not sure,
but he thought there were twenty-sic men.
Mr. Driscoll asked if the Chief didn' t think this
situation had arisen on account of the shortage of man-
power through this period and the possibility of getting
women who are so efficient.
The Chief replied that he did not understand it
that way. He said that the schools are the problem,
and that unfortunately Lexington has six schools on a
main street. No requests have been received for officers
at Fiske School or Franklin School but on the main street
they are needed.
545
He said that there must be some bad crossings in Melrose
to put on ten women for school traffic only. He explained
that the Town of Melrose is not as large in area as
Lexington. Melrose has enough men on duty and using women
for schools works out all right. If Lexington attempts to
do it under the present setup, three men will be taken off
days.
Mr. Emery said that the Chief believes there is nothing
to be gained and asked Iim' if he was prepared to say that he
does not think the women on school traffic would help. The
Chief replied that he would be glad to look into it further,
but personally right now he wished he could put on the
women, but he Gantt see that it will work because he hasntt
the men to cover the things that have to be done..
Mr. Gay asked if school duty was the officers first
assignment and the Chief said that they come in at quarter
to eight and then go out. If the day men come in later,
the night men have to stay on duty longer, but if the five
day week is put in effect, he will try and level it off.
He said that from quarter to eight until quarter to six
is a long day. During schools, the men have about thirty
minutes for lunch.
The Chairman said that he thought the Board would like
to have the Chief study the matter thoroughly, but that
there is no hurry. He asked the Chief to give •the subject
reasonable consideration, after the vacations are over, on
account of the fact that the Board would like to have him
do so.
The Chairman said that the question about seniority
at accidents has arisen and there seems to be a conflict
of opinion between the Fire Department and the police
Department. Heasked who is the senior force when the
ambulance and the Police go to the scene of an accident.
He explained that the reason for the question is because
the Board has had some feeling that some fireman were not
well prepared in first-aid and had taken the subject up
with the Fire Commissioners who have largely corrected Seniority
it already. Within a period of a few months all the at
fireman will be put through a refresher course of first accidents
aid.
The Chief said that he was amazed to hear the
Chairman say that there has been some conflict. He
said that he has been here a long time and in all his
experience never saw evidence of conflict at an accident.
He said he never saw any difference of opinion and
it has never been brought to his attention. The men
always try to get their minds together as to what is the
best procedure. He stated that the Police arrive first
and naturally they should be in charge of the accident.
Many times they are at the scene first and have radioed
back for a doctor because from experience they know
that the patient should not be moved. One of the things
they have been taught is never be in to much of a hurry.
546 ccs
' C
Cid
He said the only conflict he ever heard about
was not between the Police and Fireman, but from some
outside individual.
The Chairman asked if, because the Police
Officers arrived first, the Chief thought they should
have seniority rights in the control of whether the
patient should be moved and how quickly. The Chief
replied in the affirmative.
i e.
Mr. Gay asked if the Police Officers had a
first aid course and the Chief
replied in the affirmative. He said that there are
four men in the Department qualified to teach first-
aid.
The Clerk left the meeting at 9:50 P.M.
The Clerk and Sup' t of Public Works returned to the
meeting at 10:30 P.M.
The Chairman read a letter from Chief Rycroft
stating that the Department of Public Utilities
Lovell informed him that a petition had been received from
buses people living in the Five Forks area relative to
parked parking of Lovell buses which they claim has become
at a traffic menace. An Agent from the Department
Five informed the Chief that at the moment this is a local
' Forks problem. Mr. Burns and the Chief made a survey of the
situation and submitted a plan together with suggest-
ions that might help overcome the problem.
Upon motion of Mr. Driscoll, seconded by Mr. Gay,
it was voted to put into effect on a trial basis
suggestions outlined in the Chief' s letter dated August
20, 1951.
Chief Rycroft retired at 10:30 P.M.
On Thursday, August 16th the Chairman polled
the Board in reference to the construction of Paul Revere
Paul Road. (See Selectmen' s Meeting, August 13, 1951. ) The
Revere Chairman, Mr. Emery and Mr. Hoyt voted to instruct Mr.
Road Burns to advise the County and State that the Board is
ready to proceed.
Mr. Burns reported that Mr. Sullivan has signed a release
in connectionwith the construction of Paul Revere Road,
and in talking with Mr. Sullivan he asked him about the
brook, Mr. Sullivan has lived here and known about it for
fifty-two years.
He stated that he brought the Plan, together
with a letter, to the State and asked that they adver-
tise for a contract as soon as possible this Fall.
The Chairman suggested that Mr. Burns try to
obtain a release from the second largest property owner
and then delegate someone else to contact the other
property owners.
544
Mr. Burns submitted plans and reported on the
State traffic counts at Coolidge Avenue, Hancock Traffic
1 and Revere Streets; Lowell and Woburn Streets and counts
Barrett Road. No funds are available for any of
these projects this year and they therefore will
have to be 1952 projects.
Mr. Burns reported that he has received a re-
quest from Mr. Armstrong, Supt of the East
Middlesex Mosquito Control, for additional funds. Mosquito
The 1950 balance and most of the 1951 appropriation control
has been exhausted. He explained that 11500 will
provide for work up until April, 1952.
Mr. Burns suggested that the Superintendent be
advised to keep sufficient funds on hand for the
winter and agreed to find out what the minumum
amount is that will be needed.
Mr. Burns informed the Board that he will need
additional funds for water services. He explained
that the appropriation was 24,745 and up to August
2nd $15,261 had been used. There have been 213 Transfer
services completed, deposits received for 11 (work for water
not done) and 75 requests received with no deposits. services
He is estimating 85 more for the end of the year or a
total of 171 additional services. He had figured *80
per service which amounts to 13,680 and said that
5,000 more would give him a margin to work on.
Upon motion of Mr. Hoyt, seconded by Mr. Driscoll
it was voted to request the Appropriation Committee
to transfer the sum of 0,000 from the Reserve Fund to
the Water Services Account.
Petition was received, signed by four residents of
Spring Street requesting the extension of a water main Spring St.
from #151 to #162 a distance of approximately 500 feet. water main
Mr. Burns said that he thought the extension should
include the houses down below and that this would be a
1952 project.
Mr. Jellist request for gravel on Reed Street was
held over from the last meeting, decision having been Reed St.
held up pending further information from the Town request
Counsel relative to the status of the street. No for gravel
action was taken.
Letter was received from Mr. Jackson, Health
Sanitarian, relative to the proposed Ellison Road
development. ADcording to percolation tests, septic tanks
with a minimum of 110 feet of leaching drain should function
properly as home disposal units .
The Chairman suggested that an appointment be made Ellison
for Mr. Innis to meet with the Board, bring in a plan Road.
and tell the Board what he intends to do. This will have
to be a 1952 project.
Mr. Burns retired at 11:30 P.M.
548 an
Letter was received from Peter Marasi, 10 Gladstone
Street, North Cambridge, offering $200 for lots 644
through 648, Asbury Street.
Tax Title The Board is to look at the lots before taking
Property any action on the offer.
Letter was received from the Assistant Town Clerk
requesting a transfer of $82 to cover the cost of
ballots used in the High School referendum.
Upon motion of Mr. Emery, seconded by Mr. Driscoll
' Transfer it was voted to request the Appropriation Committee
to transfer the sum of $82 from the Reserve Fund to
the Elections Expenses Account - Jurisdiction, Town
Clerk.
Application was received from the Lexington
Choral Society requesting the use of Cary Hall for
a spring concert on April 27, 1952.
Upon motion of Mr. Hoyt, seconded by Mr. Gay,
Use of it was voted to grant the requests free of charge
Hall and suggest that the organization check on the date
about January 15th.
Letter was received from Edwin B. Worthen, Jr.
recommending that a sign, directing tourists to
Munroe Tavern, be placed on the parcel of land
Sign owned by the Town and located in front of the Munroe
Station.
Mr. Emery moved that the suggestion be approved
Mr. Driscoll seconded the motion, and it was so voted.
Upon motion of Mr. Hoyt, seconded by Mr. Driscoll,
it was voted to grant a Sunday Golf License to
Countryside Associates, Inc.
The meeting adjourned at 11:55 P.M.
A true record, Attest:
er �