HomeMy WebLinkAbout1957-11-18-BOS-min 11.29
SELECTMEN'S MEETING
November 18, 1957
A regular meeting of the Board of Selectmen was
held in the Selectmen's Room, Town Office Building,
on Monday evening, November 18, 1957 at 7:30 P.M.
Chairman James, Messrs. Reed, Maloney, Tucker and
Mrs. Morey were present. Mr. Stevens, Town Counsel,
Mr. Gayer, Superintendent of Public Works, and the
Executive Clerk were also present.
Hearing was declared open upon petition of the
Boston Edison Company and the New England Telephone
and Telegraph Company for a pole location on Upland
Road. Pole
Mr. Mahon, representing the Boston Edison Com- location
pany, was present. He explained that the telephone
company advised that the present pole is pretty much
decayed and needs to be replaced and suggests relocat-
ing it to the lot line.
Upon motion of Mr. Tucker, seconded by Mrs. Morey,
it was voted to grant the petition and sign the order
for the following j/o pole location:
Upland Road, northwesterly side, ap-
proximately 200 feet southwest of Glen
Road, One pole.
(One j/o pole to be removed.)
Miss Elizabeth Howe, !} Chandler Street, arrived
for the pole location hearing and explained that she
was representing Mrs. Arthur B. Howe.
Mr. Mahon explained the proposed location. Miss
Howe did not register any objection and retired from
the meeting.
Upon motion of Mr. Tucker, seconded by Mrs. Morey, Licenses
it was voted to grant the following licensed:
Mawhinney Motor Sales 581 Marrett Road 1st Class Agent (Renl.)
Auto Engineering, Inc. L.36 Marrett Road
Rowe-Jackson Chevrolet 39 Bedford Street "
Request for permission to locate two anchor guys Poles and
and four poles on Worthen Road was received from the guy wire
111 New England Telephone and Telegraph Company several locations
weeks ago and held up for more detailed information.
Mrs. Morey asked if the proposed poles would be
on the left-hand side of the road and Mr. Gayer re-
plied that they will be on the right-hand side.
Mr. Gayer explained that if the poles are set on
the right-hand side it will be necessary to set another
pole and still have the guys.
Mrs. Morey said it would seem to her that the poles
should be where they are the least conspicuous.
Mr. Gayer said that it would not make any dif-
ference from the school, but it will make a difference
from Waltham Street.
Mrs. Morey std that she has observed that pole
are not always placed from am aesthetic viewpoint.
Mr. Mahon said that the poles are on private pro-
perty, Town property, and that is the reason for this
type of petition. He asked if the locations as selected
were agreeable.
The Chairman said that, if he was correct, even if
these first three poles were moved to the other side of
the road, number four would still have to be in the same
place.
Mrs. Morey said that would be better looking, and
she does not like telephone poles running through empty
land.
Mr. Mahon explained that the telephone company is
trying to bring down Baskin Road and if they come on
this side, which he indicated on the plan, they have an
open area in which to make a turn, he said he could see
no reason why the poles could not be replotted with a
view to bring the line down on the other side. He said
he would take the matter up with the telephone company,
meet with their engineer on the field and see what can
be worked out.
The Chairman said that would be fine and asked how
soon the Board could expect an answer.
Mr. Mahon replied that it would not be sooner than
next Monday.
The Chairman suggested that Mr. Mahon discuss the
subject with the telephone company and if they think
the Board's recommendation is possible, it can be ap-
proved. If for some reason they .say it is not possible,
the Board may then approve this method.
Mr. Mahon retired at 7:145 P.M. and took the peti-
tion with him.
Mr. Gayer reported that, in reference to the con-
Eldred struction of Eldred Street, the people do understand
Street that betterments are to be charged. He said he could
Chapter 718 proceed on that and then it would be in order to use
Chapter 718 funds elsewhere. He explained that the
State wants to know what the Board has in mind and
asked if he could now at least report that these funds
will not be used for Eldred Street.
131
Mr. Stevens explained that betterments would be
assessed against Soule and betterments would be assessed
against Witherell but payment postponed under the Special
Act.
The Chairman reported that he had written a letter
to the Associate Commissioner, State Department of
Public Works, summarizing the points agreed upon at
the meeting held on November 7th.
The Board adjourned to Estabrook Hall to attend
a public hearing scheduled by the Board relative to
the petition of the Boston and Maine Railroad for ap-
proval by the Department of Public Utilities of the
discontinuance of trains between Boston and Bedford. Hearing re
The hearing was declared open by the Chairman curtailment
at 8:07 P.M. He said he had hoped there would be of train
more people in attendance and explained that the service
meeting was being held to discuss the changes in the
railroad service proposed by the Boston and Maine
Railroad. He said that a public hearing will be
held December 3, 1.4. and 5 at the Gardner Auditorium,
State House. That hearing is to discuss all changes
being proposed by the Railroad and not just the change
on the Lexington branch. He reported that the Board
has filed a petition with the Department of Public
Utilities for a seperate hearing on the Lexington branch
because it feels that the Lexington branch is a problem
itself and does not necessarily coincide with those in
the other cities and towns.
The Chairman explained that the Boston and Maine
Railroad proposes to eliminate one morning train and
one evening train and to leave one morning train and
one evening train to serve this branch. The remain-
ing train in the morning will leave Bedford at 7:30,
leave Lexington at 7:40 and arrive in Boston at .8:04.
The evening train will leave Boston at 5:22, arrive
in Lexington at 5:46 and arrive in Bedford at 5:55.
He said that some people now using the railroad will
be .affected by the change in schedule, if nothing more,
to such an extent that they will have to find other
means of transportation. He said it is obvious to
him that the step proposed by the railroad is another
step in the program to eliminate passenger service
on this line. He said the Selectmen and the Town
Counsel would represent the Town at the hearing in
the State House and present the attitude of the Town.
He said in order to do this fairly and represent the
feelings of the whole Town, the Board must know the
attitude of the people that use the train and that is
the reason for the hearing this evening. He said the
Board would record the expressions and be provided with
more ammunition to serve the people at the hearing.
12
z
Mr. Charles Albert Barrett, Jr. , 1299 Massachusetts
Avenue, said that he is very strongly opposed to any changes
in the passenger service on the Boston and Maine Railroad
because he depends on the two evening trains and would
like the service kept as it is indefinitely. He said
it would be inconvenient if these trains were taken
off because he works neer the North Station. He does
not drive a car and opposed any curtailment of service
whatever.
Mr. Franklin H. Howell, 108 Woburn Street, said he
wondered, assuming that the railroad is given permission
to discontinue commuter service , if it would be feasible
for the railroad to run a single unit Bud Line from Bed-
ford to Boston to arrive in Boston the same time the
second train does at 8:31 in the morning, also having
an evening train leaving Boston the same time as the
S:48. He asked if the volume of passenger traffic
would be enough so that the railroad could operate the
train at a reasonably profitable degree. He said that
he does not own or drive a car and depends on the trains.
He would be forced to take the bus and M.T.A. which is
three• changes from his house to his final destination.
The Chairman asked if he meant the Bud Line would
replace the train now to be removed.
Mr. Howell said that in the• pamphlet given out,
the railroad intends to substitute Bud Liner equipment.
An individual, who did nbt give his name, asked if
any thought had been given to splitting the time between
the two trains.
The Chairman said he could not answer that as all
the Board knows is the schedule that has been proposed.
He said one thing to find out is first, if the schedule
is approved, how many people now using the train could
not use it because it would arrive either too early or
too late.
Mr. Wilber M. Jaquith, 42 Somerset Road, said that
he has lived in Lexington about ten years. One of the
things he did before he came was to check on the train
service . At that time , there were four trains. One
train was dropped and then another train was dropped.
Now the people are faced with dropping the third train.
He said he felt that within a year there will be no
trains but the Boston and Mahn will want to use a
freight line. He said he would be of no advantage to
the Town to have a railroad just for bringing revenue
into the Boston and Maine. He said if they want to
continue to run freight, they should provide reason-
able commuter service. He said, however, that he
thought the railroad has something to be said on its
side . It is not 100% in favor of the commuters, and,
according to the railroad, they are losing money. He
has not seen any figures proving the amount of money
it is losing.
133
He 'said he thought it was up to the railroad to show
where it is losing money and why. He said he endorsed
the Board's suggestion that Lexington have a seperate
hearing on the Lexington branch because it might turn
out they are not losing money on the Lexington branch.
He said all these facts have to be brought before the
Commission if the Commission is to decide in Lexington' s
favor. He asked what the railroad proposed in lieu
of service for Lexington. He said that there is nothing
at the moment that will solve the problem. Taking more
ears into Boston will put more traffic on the roads
and result in spending more money for roads and high-
ways. He said the M.T.A. is not the volution and the
people of Lexington do not want the M.T.A. He said there
is no bus line direct from the Town to Boston and asked
if the Corn iek would issue permits for a private bus
line either for public or private transportation. He
stated that there must be some solution and the Com-
mission should be requested to suggest a solution if it
approves the petition of the Boston and Maine.
Mr. Jaquith said he thought the commuters should
consider what they are going to do if this train is
taken off. They are all faced with the same problem
and are the ones who have the problem. He said the
Selectmen could go to the hearing, and talk but if they
are not backed up by the commuters, the Commission
will not have a great deal to go on. As commuters, he
thought they might be of some assistance to the Board
in getting the facts before the Commission. He said
that would require work on someone 's part and he thought
it was upto the commuters.
A woman who did not give her name said that she
does not live in Lexington but arrived on the Lexington
branch train. She said she had figures that say 970
people take the train from Cambridge to Bedford every
day and this is being considered by the Selectmen in
Arlington this evening at a private meeting. She said
the line carries a lot of freight and the people in
Arlington do not think they should be permitted the
freight unless there is passenger service too.
The Chairman askedihere she obtained her figures
and she replied from the Conductor, taken daily, both
trains in the morning and the two in the evening. She
said there are 970 paid fares a day.
The Chairman asked if that included Arlington
people, and she replied in the affirmative.
Mr. Barrett said that he thought when the fares
were raised last Spring the trains lost a lot of
passengers. He said if the fares were dropped more
people would ride on the train and not drive their
ears.
Mr. Lewis M. Reynolds, 7 Eaton Road, said he would
1.71
134
x
like to go on record as being opposed to this change.
He said he rides every day in the week and will miss
the last train. He said he would not consider a fare
increase. His fare is about 45g to North Lexington and
it costs 40¢ by subway. To increase the fare would
drop the patronage.
Mr. Francis T. Rice, 65 Blake Road, asked the
Chairman is he thought if the commuters get together
and made a concerted effort to put before this Com-
mission it would carry more weight, if the railroad
comes to the decision they are going to take this
train off anyway.
The Chairman said he could not answer that.
Mr. Rice said that Pearlman, in one statement,
thought the communities should take over the commuting
service. The Boston and Ohio railroad has asked the
commission to let them take off twelve trains because
their passenger service dropped over 46%. He said he
wondered how much the commuters could do to get the
Commission to keep this second train on. He said the
schedule shortens it up at night and lengthens it in
the morning. He explained that it is difficult to
leave an office at 5:00 and get a train twenty-two
minutes after. He said he supposed the schedule is to
fit the crew workday, as they don't want to pay them
for more than eight hours.
Mrs. Roy B. Maynard, 6 Grove Street, said they took
a petition on the train last June and obtained over 500
names. That was submitted to the D.P.U. She said she
would like to know if the men on the train aren't trans-
ferred to other trains after they leave these,
The Chairman said that 3:t has been difficult to
get the railroad's Figures.
Mrs. Maynard said she knew that. She said she was
interested in Arlington because she gets on and off there.
She said she would like to know why the ticket man's
salary is all charged to the passenger service as he does
not spend much time selling passenger's tickets.
One individual asked about the rent from the Stations
and asked if it went to the railroad. He asked if that
income was given to freight and not passenger train ser-
vice.
Mrs. Maynard asked if she could obtain a stockholder's
report.
The Chairman explained that any stockholder has one.
Mr. Barrett said if the second train is taken off,
it will mean people getting in before nine and they would
be too early. He said if they miss that train, they will
have to go a roundabout way to get to Bosto#. He said
the two trains are needed for the benefit of everyone.
Mr. Jaquith said that there is quite a bit that
could be done in getting facts about Lexington com-
muters.
1(35
He said he does not know how many there are, how many
take the trains or how many would be stuck without
the trains. He said he was wondering if it is worth
considering having the Selectmen appoint a committee
of commuters to work on this or for the commuters
themselves to organize a group to get some facts and work
with`the Selectmen on this, so when they go to the hear-
ing, they will be able to present Lexington's case backed
up by facts.
The Chairman said the Board would like very much to
have information of that kind and asked if Mr. Jaquith
would like to organize a committee of commuters.
Mr. Jaquith said he would see what he could do but
would like a suggestion as to how many should be on the
committee.
One individual said it was unfortunate that there
was not more publicity given the subject and another
individual said he could give the Board a count.
The Chairman said that as long as Mr. Jaquith will
Chairman the Committee, he should receive such infor-
mation at the moment. He asked if there was anyone who
would like to help Mr. Jaquith.
Mr. Jaquith said he had in mind a questionaire
which would be a factual setup with a number of questions
' to be answered that would be based on each train. The
committee could then go on from there.
Mr. Roger H. Stone, 8 Bertwell Road, said he has
been riding this line for ten or fifteen years, and
apparently all those people who got on. the first train
this morning are not too disturbed. He said he would
like very much to work with Mr. Jaquith and stated that
it is up to the commuters to work on it. He said he
talked to Mr. Adams a few weeks ago, and was assured
that• there would be publicity. He said what they need
to do is to get out and ring door bells if they are going
to- save one train. He said he would like to see both
trains continued, and perhaps the committee could do
something to get a Bud Liner out here. He said one
could not blame the railroad for wanting to take off
that second train as on November 11th, which he admit-
ted was a holiday;, there were only four people on the
train with a crew of five. Perhaps if the Railroad
feels it cannot continue the two-car train, it may con-
sider sending a Bud out and back again timed similar
to the one in existence now. He said he was on record
as being opposed to the removal of the second train
and would work with the committee to try and sell the
commuter's cause.
Mrs. Stillman P. William 9 Sheridan Street, asked
about the responsibility of public utility companies.
Mr. Stevens explained it always has been the re-
sponsibility of any public utility company to furnish
service.
136 me
He stated that the railroad company, according to them,
have reached the point where they can't continue
service because of the loss incurred, and unless the
State or public body can furnish funds, they will
have to curtail service. He said that, in a nutshell,
is their position. He said the freight earnings in this
branch should come into the picture, but they are losing
out of pocket on the passenger trains on the Lexington
branch. He said the freight figures have never been
disclosed and at thelest hearing, the D.P.U. refuse&/t require
to be furnished.
One individual asked if the railroad was trying
to force public subsistence and the Chairman replied
that any answer he would give would be an opinion.
The Chairman said if there were no more comments
to be made perhaps there could be a showing of hands
of those in favor of the petition. No ono present
raised his hand in favor.
The Chairman asked for a showing of hands of
those who opposed the petition. There were twenty-
four people present and twenty-four people opposed.
Mr. Rice asked if there would be any objection#
in advertising a meeting and said if they go before
the Commission with twenty-four people and 900 riders,
it will not make very good ammunition. He said they
have a little over two weeks to have another meeting
and get more people out. He said he mentioned this
meeting to several people on the train and they did
not know about it.
The Chairman suggested that perhaps the commuters '
committee might hold a meeting and have it publicized.
He said the Board could arrange for space for such a
meeting.
The Chairman explained that the hearings start,
as now scheduled, on December 3rd. The Selectmen have
had no reply to their petition for a separate hearing,
so as far as they know, it will be the 3rd, 14th and 5th
of December.
One individual said a point to be considered at
the hearing is the parking problem is East Lexington.
The Chairman said that there is parking space,
heat and lights; all factors which the Board will
bring out.
The hearing adjourned at 8:15 P.M. at which UM*
the Board returned to the Selectmen's Room to continue
its regular meeting.
The Chairman read a letter from the Board of
Fire Commissioners advising that, in reply to the
Board's request to use the East Lexington station for
voting and storage of the voting machines, the Commission
is happy to comply with the request and will be ready
to help out any time the machines are taken down.
137
The Chairman reported that he has not been able Voting
to discuss this subject with the School Committee yet.
The Chairman recalled that the Board had received
a letter from the Massachusetts Conservation Council
re legislation passed for the establishment of a con-
servation committee by various cities and towns. The
communication was referred to the Planning Board.
A letter was received from the Planning Board Conservation
advising that in the opinion of the Board the Act Council
is not particularly applicable to Lexington. The
development of the natural resources of the Town has
been given considerable study by the Board in the
preparation of a long-range development plan. Some
recommendations tor the development of these resources
have already been made and others will be included in
the near future.
Mr. Stevens said that at the meeting last week
with the Standing School Building Committee, it was
decided legislation should be sought for renovation Legislation
of the Junior High School. He said he thought the
Board should sign any petition for legislation by
next Monday and he wanted to run through a draft
II
to get the Board's views. Following that he will
put it in final form. He explained that he has
gievn the committee a copy of the draft and will
send a copy to the Appropriation Committee.
The Board recommended no changes in the pro-
posed draft, with the exception of the period of
borrowing.
Mr. Stevens also read a draft of proposed legis-
lation relative to the Historic Districts Commission.
Mr. Stevens reported that the hearing was held
today on the Woburn Street grade crossing. If the
petition is granted, the railroad will take away
the shack and trim up the shrubs oh both sides. If
they can do what they propose without gates, it will
save $4,000 a year. He explained that there will be
twenty-four hour a day protection with Stop aid Protect.
He agreed to advise Mrs. Levis of the situation.
Mr. Stevens retired at 9:40 P.M.
Application was received from the Secretary of
State for Certificate of Incorporation on behalf of
John Silk, 19 Patriots Drive. Cert. of
The Chairman read a letter from Chief Rycroft Inc.
giving a record on .filenwit}} t}ab'?Bbardo*f Probation ,
dating from June 1, 1927 to November 23, 1951.
133
It was unanimously agreed to insert after the
words "and report the following facts" the words
"see record attached" and attach a copy of Chief
Rycroft 's letter.
Application was received from the Secretary of
State for a Certificate of Incorporation on behalf
of David F1, Sgykes, 39 Greenwood Street. A satis-
Cert, of factory character reference was received from the
Inc. Chief of Police.
Upon motion of Mr. Maloney, seconded by Mr.
Reed, it was voted to sign the certificate.
Further consideration was given to Mr. Paul
Lloyd's offer of $500 for lots 228 through 233s
Freemont Street.
A proposal to sell was advertised in the November
7, 1957 issue of the Lexington Minute-man.
A letter was also received from Philip J. Knox,
Jr., 18 Greenwood Street, offering $550 for the same
lots.
On January 22, 1957, Mr. Knox had submitted an
Tax title offerer $300. The offer was acknowledged and Mr. Knox
lots advised that the Board would include it in a list of
tax title offers to be decided .upon some time in the
last Spring or early Summer of 1957. However, when
the Board viewedthe property, Mr. Knox'6 offer was not
given to them.
Mrs. Morey said if these lots are sold, they should
be restricted to the erection of one house and she also
felt that the Board should know who owns lots 225 and
226. According to the Assessors ' records, Mr. Knox
owns 227. She further suggested that disposition of
the lots be discussed with the Planning Board.
The Chairman read a letter from Mr. Edwin A.
Wheeler, 221 Charles Street, Waltham, advising that he will
pay the price of $200 plus sewer betterment of $113.36,
entertained by the Board for lot 19, Block 18, Reed
Tax title Street. Mr. Wheeler now owns lots 20 and 21, Block 18,
lots Reed Street.
A Mr. Donald Gibbs , 41 Wamsutta Avenue, Waltham,
also submitted an offer of $150 for the same two lots.
It was agreed to advise Mr. Gibbs that it 1.s the
intention of the Board to sell the lots to the abut-
ting owner and to advise Mr. Wheeler that lots 19, 20
and 21 will be restricted to the erection of one house.
The Clerk was instructed to bring in a plan so
the Board would know definitely the size of the lots
in question.
139
The Chairman read a letter from Norman T. May,
advising that Mr. Onel Deflice is willing to pay $200
each for lots 1 and 2, Block 29, Reed Street, plus
a sewer betterment of $175.
Upon motion of Mrs. Morey, seconded by Mr. Reed, Tax title
it was voted that a proposal to sell the lots be ad- lots
vertiaed in the Lexington Minute-man and that further
consideration be given the offer in two weeks.
A detailed estimate of $234 for printing 500
copies of the General By-Laws was received from
Spaulding-Moss. By-Laws
Upon motion of Mr. need, seconded by Mr. Maloney,
it was voted to authorize Spaulding-Moss to print 500
copies of the General By-Laws.
The Chairman reported that he met with Superin-
tendent Smith, Mrs. Marek, Mr. Fisher and Mr. Erickson
Saturday morning and went over the Barnes property.
Mr. Smith now says he will need only 2300 square feet
of space by 1967. Mr. Smith would like space in the
main part of the building and Mr. Erickson estimates
it will cost $10,000 to make the building suitable.
The Planning Board, Welfare Department and Cemetery
Commissioners are not part of that space. Barnes
The Chairman said that the Wel $ $ and Cemetery property
Departments are going to move over/nut the Board
still has to find a place for the Planning Board. He
said he thought the basement of this building would be
adequate.
Mr. Maloney said there would have to be some alter-
ations and by such an arrangement all Town Departments
would then be in the two buildings.
Mrs. Morey asked if there was any reason why the
Cemetery Commissioners go along with the We]tkre . She
said there is a conference room in the new building
that the Cemetery Commissioners could use. She said
the Planning Board does have a number of plans and
could use the vault in the Police Department; the Wel-
fare and Cemetery Commissioners could have a seperate
entrance and the Planning Board would have a seperate
entrance.
The Chairman said that the Board would have to ask
the Boy Scouts to constrict the area in which they are
working or by fixing up a part of the wing which is
being used by the Red Feather they would have room. He
said, however, by doing that, the heating system will
need some work done on it.
Mr. Maloney asked if the Board was ready for the
School Department to take over the building; if so, say
8s
so.
Mrs. Morey said she thought the Board should tall
the Boy Scouts they are there on a temporary basis and
140 1-6
should be looking for other quarters.
The Chairman explained that this is something that
would take place about next June. If they renovate the
third floor and renovate the first floor to take care
of the Superintendent 's office, they will spend
$38,000. It will cost about $5,000 to refurbish the
same area for three classrooms and according to Mr.
Erickson, it will cost $10,000 to fix the Barnes
property, so by their figures the Town will be saving
20,000 by this move.
The Meeting adjourned at 10:40 P.M.
A true record, Attest:
5elec en
•
I
1