Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1963-05-13-min 328 SELECTMEN'S MEETING I May 13, 1963 A regular meeting of the board of Selectmen was held in the Selectmen' s Room, Town Office Building, on Monday, May 13, 1963, at 7:30 P.M. Chairman Cole, Messrs. Brown, Burnell and Cataldo were present. Mr Gray, Executive Assistant, and Miss Murray, Executive Clerk, were also present . Hearing was declared open upon petition of Temple Emunah for permission to store 6,000 gallons of #2 fuel oil underground on premises located on Route 2 Concord Turnpike. Dr. Gerald Stechler, 68 Bertwell Road, repre- senting the Temple, was the only person present at the hearing. Notice of the hearing was mailed to the peti- tioner, owners of all property deemed by the Board Oil storage to be affected thereby as they appear on the most hearing recent local tax list and also advertised in the May 2, 1963 issue of the Lexington The application was approved by Mr. p. J. Belcastro, 11 Chief Engineer of the Lexington Tire Department. The heating was declared closed and Dr. Stechler retired. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to grant a license to Temple Emunah to maintain an underground tank for the storage of 6,000 gallons of #2 fuel oil on premises at Route 2 Concord Turnpike. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted Minutes to approve the minutes of the Selectmen's Meeting held May 5, as amended Mr. Gray read a letter from Chief John W. Rycroft advising that because of unforeseen expenses, it is necessary to request a transfer of $150 to the Parking Meter Fund. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to request the Appropriaticn Committee to transfer the sum of $150 from the Parking Meter Fund to thePolice Parking Meter Account . Mr. Gray read a letter fromMr. Oscar W. Carlson, 1 Wachusett Drive, requesting the Board to make him an offer for lot 57 on Rockville Avenue, the Board having taken the lot in fee simple for school, play- ground and other public purposes. (Moreland Avenue school site) . 329 Mr. Gray reported that the Town had an appraisal made and there seems to be a difference of opinion between Mr. Carlson and the appraiser. The appraiser has established a value of $1250 and Mr. Carlson wants $3,000. Lot 57 Mr. Gray requested permission to negotiate, and Rockville if he is unsuccessful in readhing an agreement, to Avenue refer the subject to Town Counsel. The requested permission was granted. Mr. Gray reported that, at the Board's request, to asked the Planning Lirector about the status of the C-1 zbbe, The Planning Board is working on the C-1 zone and has more meetings planned but has nothing definite to repprt at this time. Mr. Gray was instructed to advise the Planning Board that Selectmen ha the would like to know specifically if the proposed revamping of the C-1 zone will be ready for presentation to Town Meeting in September. Mr. Gray read a letter from Mr. Harvey Newgent referring to a parcel of land owned by John Chiesa, Newgent' a adjacent to the William Diamond Junior High School, church site which he said would be an ideal site for a church. He has presented this to such a group and the problem is entrance and nearness to water and sewer Mr Newgent requested an expression of opinion from the Board as to how it would feel about giving an easement for war, sewerage and driveway Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to refer the subject to the Planning Beard for an opinion. At 7:1+5 P.M. , hearing was declared open upon peti- tion of Emerson Gardens Realty Corp. for permission to store 36,000 gallons of #2 fuel oil underground on Oil Aorage premises located on Maple Street . hearing Mr. William E. Maloney, representing the petitioner, was the only person present at the hearing. Notice of the hearing was mailed to the petitioner, Notice of the hearing was mailed to the petitioner, owners of all property deemed by the Board to be affected thereby as they appear on the most recent local tax list and also advertised in the May 2, 1963 issue of the Lexington Minute-man. The application was approved by Mr. B. J. Belcastro, Chief Engineer of the Lexington Fire Department. The hearing was declared closed and upon motion du ly made and seconded, it was voted to grant a license 330 3C to the Emerson Gardens llty Corp. to maintain an underground tank for the storage of 36,000 gallons of #2 fuel oil on premises located on Maple Street. Mr. John J. Carroll, Superintendent of Public Works, met with the Board. He said that hat week at a meeting of the Planning Board which he attended, the width of Emerson and Worthen Roads was discussed. The Planning Board' s feeling was unanimous that the width of Emerson Road should not be forty-four feet wide. He stated the argument was simply that it would be difficult to get Emerson and Worthen Roads through the Town Meeting, being advertised as wide Width of roads. He explained to the Planning board that Worthen and the first subdivision that included Worthen Road was Emerson Roads Colonial Acres and the pavement there was thirty feet wide with the layout of seventy feet, and the utilities were all on the edge of the pavement. Before that, a section of Emerson Road was built twenty-four feet wide in the Burnham Farms area. No excavation was done beyond the twenty-four foot width He stated that wh_n Worthen Road was buDt through the Center playground, he discussed the width with the Board and the question came up as to whether or not it should be thirty feet wide. The Board at that time 11decided that the width of the road should be forty-four feet and all future subdivisions should be forty-four feet wide. He reported that he told the Planning Board he did not have any real objection to making sections of Emerson and Worthen Roads thirty feet wide, but he did feel that all the excavation should be done for a forty- font foot road. He also told the Planning Board there are now two sections of Emerson Road ready to receive hot top; one in the Grove section and the other in the Emerson Gardens and a decision would have to be made right away. He said from Mr. Maloney's standpoint, he felt that the forty-four width is what he wants. Mr. Green, of Greener and Whiter, said he did not care one way or the other. Mr. Carroll said he would defi- nitely go to the forty-four foot width in Emerson Gardens. Mr. Brown asked if Mr. Carroll thought. the Board should be consistent all the way. He said he was in favor of the forty-four foot width at Emerson Gardens, but he also thought it should be forty-four feet in the Grove. He asked what happens, from an aesthetic point of view, from the gravel base to the edge of the loam. Mr. Carroll explained he would put in loam. There will be a fifteen foot grass strip, five foot sidewalk and thirty foot pavement. Mr. Brown asked if it would be less expensive to do it now, and Mr. Carroll replied that in the long run it may cost more to wait. cw 00 1 Mr. Cataldo stated that during the winter, snow can be pushed back and there would still be room to park a car. Mr. Maloney said Emerson Road has been a very, very expensive road in the Emerson Gardens because there was peat in there and it required many thousands of yards of gravel and fill. He stated that doing it all at once was by far the most economical. He said that where there is time, it is the proper width and the contract let to do a certain portion of the road, he felt it would not be wise to change it at this time. The Chairman asked if Mr. Carroll was, at the moment , saying Emerson hoed should be forty-four feet in pavement Mr. Carroll replied that it could be forty-four feet in some areas and thirty in others . The Planning Board met with the Selectmen. Mr. Mabee said what interests the Planning Board is this. When it goes to Town Meeting, the Planning Board would hate not to get an access or right of way because of the fact the width of the road is a bother- some point to some people. He said any way an access or right of way can be accomplished,. the Planning Board I II does not care about the width. He said many people do not like a wide pavement. He said if there is no need now to have the road wide, the Planning Board is in favor of building it narrow. The Chairman asked if the Planning Board thought the road should be forty-four feet wide or thirty feet wide. Mr. Mabee said the Planning Board would take the stand of getting it through Town Meeting. Mr. Cataldo said there is no section of Bmerson Road built forty-four feet wide and Mr. Carroll said that was correct. Mr. Meyer said the Planning Board talked toxone of the people objecting, who thinks it is probably necessary in the future, and dues not mind the seventy foot right of way, but objects to the forty-four foot in areas that don't go any place. He said he was a proponent of keeping the road down to thirty feet . The Chairman asked if the Planning oard felt the road should be the same width throughout, and Mr. Mabee replied that the Planning Board was not saying anything. It would like to work it out so it can get something through Town Meeting. He said the Planning Board is interested in a right of way and suggested that Mr. Carroll might like to take the width of the entire road end come up with different w,,idths. '"'Clh r== The Chairman asked if the Planning BoarC.Was re- commending thirty feet in the Grove, and Mr. Mabee 11 replied that is what he suggests. Mr. Brown said the Board considers Emerson Road a seventy foot road with a forty-four foot wide pave- ment. The Town has taken the steps to reimburse developers and the money is available. He said it would seem to him it would be better to have the work done now and spend the money rather than to wait five years from now and then raise the money in the tax levy. Mr. Mabee agreed and said if it is not possible TownMeeting because of the width, get it through a ng he would rather compromise. Mr. Brown stated that the special funds were created for this purpose. Mr. Cataldo stated that it will cost just as much to grass it in Mr. Burnell asked if the two Boards hadritt already agreed, over the period of the last three years, that the width shol.d be seventy feet . He said there was no question about that and it has nothing to do with the ability or inability to get an article through Town Meeting. Mr. Mabee said if the road is built too wide, the people will vote it down. Mrs. Skov, a resident of Hawthorne Road, said the people are opposed to anything beyond thirty feet and stated that it would ruin the entire area. They do not like wide roads. She said if there was an agreement that the road would be thirty feet wide until it has to be wider, they could live with that Mr. Carroll explained that is why he thought it should be forty-four feet because people who live on the road now are afraid of the seventy feet. If it is built thirty feet wide, there will be a battle when the road has to be built seventy feet. Mr. ''ataldo said there is a seventyfoot taking with a thirty foot road, and asked who would improve this strip from the street line to the property line and who would mow it. Mr. Carroll replied that it is the responsibility of the abutters. He explained if there are no houses, the Town would mow it. Mrs. Skov said there is about thirty feet in front of her house that she does not own but she takes care of it . Mr. Maloney said the developer is required by the Planning Board to do certain things and the plan is not approved unless the developer agrees , as he did, to put in a forty-four foot road. He said it is unfortunate 04141 Oat) that developers must give this land and then put the road in, and except for the fact he is reimbursed for a part of it, it would be a very costly road. He said in his case, it is practically a deadend and it will be easier for the Town to plow the street if it has the width, and it would be much better to leave it as it is in this section. Mr. Mabee asked Mr. Carr( 11 if the area in the Grove should be forty-four feet, and Mr. Carroll replied that ultimately he thought it should be. Mr. Campbell asked if Mr. Carroll would lay it out with a sixteen foot island in the middle, and he replied in the negative, stating that there would not be room enough on either side Mr. Meyer said he thought the matter of payment to developers for the width should be settled now. He said this is avvery poor type of thing to get into unless the Board has to, and he questioned the necessity of making any payment to the developers. Mr. Maloney said, as far as the developer is con- cerned, the Town is taking some very valuable land away from him for nothing, and the ceveloper has to develop all this property because the Planning Board says he must. The Chairman suggested taking this in three parts; number one, Emerson Road. Mr. Carroll, the Planning Board and the Board of Selectmen agreed on a paved width of forty-four feet. It was agreed by all present that there would be no change in the width of Emerson Road in the Emerson Gardens' development. The Chairman then referred to the Grove and said Mr. Carroll stated this area would have an effect on btbbr areas up north and felt there should be a seventy foot taking and a forty-four foot gravel base. Mr. Mabee said he was not too much concerned about the base, but was concerned about the paving. He said he was not concerned about the subdividers, but what the Town has to acquire, the fee in the land, to get across the road. He said if they were talking about a road with a narrow paving width, the better chance it would have getting through the Town Meeting. The Chairman said if there was going to be a thirty foot paved area from Burlington Street to Emerson Gardens, the Town would still need a seventy foot taking. Mr. Meyer said he was recommending that the Town take seventy feet all the way as each subdivision comes in, building a thirty-foot road and reserve widening until some future date. In this case, there would be no payment to be made to subdividers. 334 ha rzi The Chairman asked if this reflected the Planning Board's thinking, and Mr. Mabee replied that the members were talking as individuals. Mr. Carroll said to widen a road that is thirty feet to forty-four feet would be very, very expensive. He stated it cost a great deal more money to widen Worthen Road than the original construction. Mr. Burnell asked if this would be a seventy foot taking, a forty-four foot base and a thirty foot pavement Mr. Carroll replied in the affirmative. Mr. Meyer said the thing he feared is the continued payment by the Town to developers. If it is more economical to do it now by reimbursement than doing it later, he had an open mind on it . Mr. Burnell asked if the Planning Board had agreed unanimously that the road width of Emerson and Worthen Roads should be forty-four feet. Mr. Mabee replied not this present Board. Mr. Campbell said the Board says it will eventually need to be forty-four feet wide. Mr. Mabee said a thirty foot pavement , a forty-four foot base and a seventy foot right of way all the way through would be fine. Mr. Carroll suggested that he be permitted to make some recommendations and the Board could go along with them or not. Mr. Campbell asked if it would make sense if the Planning Board gave the subdivider a choice as towhether the Town build the road and charged him for it, or if he built it and the Town paid a percentage. Mr. Carroll replied that these two roads should be laid out by the Town and constructed by the Town with the developer paying his share of the estimated cost in ad- vance. At the end of the Sob, the unit price could be worked out and the Town might pay the developer or he might pay the Town. The Chairman asked, for the immediate problem, if it was the sense of the Selectmen that the Grove should be a seventy foot taking, forty-four foot gravel base and a thirty foot pavement. Messrs. Cataldo, Burnell and Brown were recorded as being in favor of the forty-four foot width. The Chairman was recorded as being in favor of thirty feet because he thought there would be other areas where the road would have to go down to thirty feet. He said if the road had to be widened in the future, the Board would still have the taking and the gravel base•:and it will not be so expensive. Mr. Burnell said the Planning board should cone up with a plan of Emerson Road through Lexington show- ing the widths. 000 Mr. MabeePlanningBoard's recommendation said the is thirty foot pavement, forty-foot gravel base and a seventy-foot taking. Mr. Burnell asked if the Planning Board thought the thirty-foot width would take care of the traffic on Emerson Road for fifteen years, and Mr. Mabee replied in the affirmative. He said he thought this was the best recommendation to the Board. Mr. Burnell said he would go along with the Planning Board's recommendation. Mr. Brown said he would go along with the re- commendation if it were something a little more specific. Mr. Mabee said if there was thirty feet all the way from Grove Street past Woburn Street, there will be a subdivision between Woburn Street and Maple Street and the Planning Board could require them to build it the forty-foot width and there he would not oWct because the Town had the taking which it did Mr. Brown asked if Mr. Mabee was saying that from Grove Street to Woburn Street would be satisfactory. Mr. Mabee replied in the affirmative. The Chairman asked if Mr. Carroll would like a decision this evening regarding Grove Street, and Mr. Carroll replied in the affirmative. Mr. Cataldo, referring to the section from Woburn Street to Grove Street, asked if there wculd be any section where anyone would abk to have it forty-four feet wide. Mr. Carroll replied that he was not prepared to say that it should end at Woburn Street and suggested that possibly it should be East Street. He said he would go along with thirty feet in the northerly part of Town, including Grove StreL.t. He said he did not think anyone would ask for forty-four feet fram East Street up. Mr. Burnell asked if it was understood that the Planning Board would not require anything wider than a thirty-foot pavement in any subdivision. Mr. Carroll said for tonight , make it north of East Street . He said when the time comes to widen the road, in his opinion, there will be real problems in trying to widen it out . The group retired at 8:45P.M. Hearing was declared open upon written complaint of Mr. Derek Baker, 23 Ivan Street, against a dog owned by 1i. klbert Hildebrand, 26 Donald Street. Mr. Derek Baker, Mr.Albert Hildebrand and Mr. Earl Outhet, 25 Ivan Street, wishing to give evidence, stood, raised their right hands and swore that the evi- dence to be given in this case would be the truth, the 336 MC whole truth and nothing but the truth Dog Officer, Michael Shaughnessy, was also present. Mr. Baker said he regretted having to bring this m tter before the Board of Selectmen and hoped Mr. Hildebrand and he could have settled it, but Mr. Hildebrand has never contacted him. He said his animal was killed on his property and was tied. His only alternative was to approach the Board. He said he was concerned for his two children, one a year old and one three years old. He said in spite of the fact this animal did kill his animal, he is still loose and he was seen on his land by him, his wife and Mr. Outhet . He said he wanted some guarantee that his children would be safe on his property from this animal. He said he was not prepared to ask that the animal be destroyed, but he would like to have the animal restrained and he requested the Board to take whatever action necessary to restrain this animal, and if this is not possible, to have himdestroyed. Mr. Outhbt said he lived next door and also had a little dog which he keeps tied. He said his wife goes shopping and is afraid to tie the dog out when she goes because they do not want the same thing to hcp pen to their dog. He said he did not think it would be an imposition for Mr. Hildebrand to keep the dog tied. Mr. Hildebrand said he has five children of his own and has had this dog since he was a puppy, and he has always been a good animal. He stated that the dog is two years old now and is getting rambunctious. When he first heard about the incident, he called his attorney and insurance company and was told not to do anything he shouldn't do. He reported that last night he put a stake in the back yard of his house and has the dog chained and woullpermanently restrain him in the back yard. He said he did not know what aggravated the assault on the other dog. He said he would, without being ordered, restrain the dog on a chain because he breaks or chews through a rope. The Chairman said he had received the Dog Officer's report and asked if he had anything further to report. Officer Shaughnessy replied in the negative. Mr. Brown asked if Mr.Baker would be satisfied with Mr. Hildebrand's restraining the dog without an order from the Board. Mr. Baker replied as long as he is restrained, he would be. Mr. Hildebrand said he hoped the dog would not break the chain, but if he did, he would ge a stronger one. He said the animal is not vicious, but he would keep him restrained. Messrs . Baker and Hildebrand retired at 8:55 P.M. 041N" " The Chairman asked Officer Shaughnessy if there had been other complaints, and he replied in the negative. He reported that he has driven by the house several times and has not seen the dog out. Officer haughnessy retired. Upon motion duly made and seconded, in view of the information from Mr. Hildebrand and the Dog Officer, it was voted to send a letter to Mr. Hildebrand stating that the Board would accept his offer to voluntarily restrain the dog, but if he does not follow through, the Board will consider, upon receipt of another complaint, issuing a restraining order. The Chairman read a telephone message from Mr. EphrSsm Weiss, 462 Lowell Street, a TownMeeting Member, protesting against the procedure in calling a Special Election because he felt there was insufficient time for candidates to file. He told the Clerk if this was done with no malice, some- thing should be written in the paper to explain the situ- Special ation. Election The Chairman explained that, upon beim petitioned by citizens for an election, the Board must set the date within forty-five days, and June 17 was the last Monday within the forty-five days. Mr. Carroll reported that he took bids on sidewalk tractors and received a net bid of $5,537 from Davis Sidewalk Tractor and a net bid of $5,194 from Cassidy, Lee, Inc. tractor He said he has made arrangements to see the tractors and will make a recommendation next week. Mr. Carroll said he would like to discuss side- walks with the Board next week. He plans to present some recommendations and suggested that the Board review the sidewalk budget for 1963. Letter was received from Mrs. Charles P. Dow, 36 Winthrop xoad, requesting the installation of a street Street light light at the corner of Winthrop and Sherburne Roads. Mr. Carroll reported that he has taken care of the request. Petition from residents in the immediate vicinity of the intersection of Meriam Street and Hayes Avenue, Traffic requesting that Hayes Avenue be made a "Full Stop" street both ways at Meriam Street, was referred to the Traffic Study Committee. Notice was received from the State Department of Public Works, approving amendments tothe Traffic Rules 338 MC and Regulations prohibiting parking on the southerly ' Traffic side of North Hancock Street from Bedford Street for a Rules distance of 250 feet and on the northerly side of Ledgelawn Avenue from Bedford Street for a distance of 50 feet. Mrs. James Kelley's letter with reference to damage to her property at 36 Rindge Avenue was held over. Mr. Carroll reported that he and Mrs. Kelley had Kelley reached an agreement whereby he would have the hot top complaint removed and the area loamed and seeded. He explained that it would be an inexpensive solution to the situ- ation. The Chairman read a letter from the Planning Board stating that it is the Board' s opinion that the easterly ebd of Pelham Road should be relocated so as to obtain a better sight distance at its intersection with Massachu- setts Avenue. It is the Board's understanding that Pelham Road is a town way to Bennington Road having been accepted as a town way to this point in 1960. To provide what the Board considers an acceptable second means of accesato the westerly end of Pelham Road, the Board recommended laying out as a town way that portion of Bennington Road which is now a private way. The Chairman said this recommendation should be con- sidered for the Annual Town Meeting, 1964. Mr. Carroll agreed tohave a layout prepared. The Chairman read a letter from the Lexington Civic Associaticn, Inc. , asking under what circumstances of- ficials or employees of theTown may use motor vehicles owned by the Town for their personal use. Use of The Chairman said men in Mr. Carroll 's department Mown cars have cars because they are on twenty-four hour call but do not have them for their personal use and Mr. Carroll agreed. The Chairman said as far as he knew, Town officials do not use cars for their personal use. Mr. Burnell said the Police and Fire Chiefs use Town cars so much - twenty-four hour call - he thought it was difficult to differentiate between what might be a personal errand and use of the car in the course of business. It was agreed to advise the Association that no one is authorized specifically to ase Town cars for persorsl business. 00(1 aav Mr. Carroll reported that bids are heirg taken for the construction of a gravel roadway into Baskin Baskin playground and indicated the location of the road on a Playground plan. He stated that it will cost approximately $9,000. Mr. Carroll referred to the Compton Circle and Peacock Farm road sewers and reported that Mr. Snyder, 36 Peacock Farm Road, Mr. Moldave, 6 Compton Circle and Mr. Kriegman, 1. Compton Circle, have all been contacted. He stated that Mr. Kriegman and Mr. Moldave would like $500 in damages. The other two people have not mentioned anything about damages but they do want the Town to make a taking in both cases. He said he would like to go ahead, make a plan and proceed with the taking. The Board agreed to his suggestion. Upon suggestion of Mr. Cataldo, it was agreed to invite Representative John Brox to meet with the Board Veto next Monday night to discuss the subject of veto power in relation to Route 3 Mr. Carroll retired at 9:15 P.M. The Chairman read a report from Dog Officer Shaughnessy relative to a written complaint received from Mr. Burt E. Nichols, 9 Tufts Road, against Mr. J. Martignetti' s dog, 29 Fairbanks Road. Dog hearing It was agreed to schedule a hearing to be held May 27, 1963, at 8:30 P.M. The Chairman read a letter from Mr. Donald K. Irwin, Building Inspector, advising that he would like to take hia vacation in the same manner as he Vacation has in the past, by taking one day a week throughout the summer, probably Fridays The Board had no objection. Invitation was received from the Veterans of Foreign Wars to attend a Joint Installation of the Invitation Lexington Post and its Auxiliary on Saturday, May 18. Mr. Cole agreed to represent the Board and Mr. Cataldo said he would also attend if it were possible. Notice was received from the Middlesex County Selectmen's Association relative to Ladles' Night to be held at the Concord Country Club on Wednesday, May 22. ' Appointment of a member to the Recreation Com- mittee to fill the vacancy caused by Mr. Bertini 's Appoifrtment resignation was held over. 340 c. Mr. Legro arrived at the Meeting at 9:55 P.M. Letter received fromJoseph P. Shannon, 32 Fairlawn Lane, claiming damages in the amount of $217 for damage Claim to his car which was involved in an accident with a police cruiser, was referred to Town Counsel Mr. Legro reported that there are a number of cases in litigation. He stated that he had engaged Mr. Norman J. Richards to try the case of Vitale against the Town which is a sidewalk construction Legal case and would like approval of the Board to work Department with Mr. Richards or some trial lawyer He said he would like to do as much of the trial work as possible himself, but he cannot handle it all. He said he would like general approval but would mention specifically each ease as it comes up. He explained that with the number of Appellate Tax Board cases, the litigation that Mr. Stevens was unable to complete, new litigation coming in, together with routine work, it makes it impossible to do it all in the work day. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to authorize Mr. Legro to engage Mr. Richards, or some trial lawyer, to assist him. Mr. Cataldo asked if Mr. Legro would use Mr. Richards all the time, and he replied that he would like to whenever he can. In the event he will not be able to get him, he has two or three other people in mind. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to grant Taxi Driver Licenses to George W. Butters, Licenses 21 Washington Street and Donald W. Jurek, 22 Marion Road, Bedfor4 satisfactory character references having been received from Chief Rycroft Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted Dump permit to grant a Yearly Dump Permit to Lawrence J. Broderick, an Arlington Landscaper who does work in Lexington. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted Sidewalk to sign an order for the construction of a sidewalk in Marrett Road in front of house #387. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to sign orders for the construction of a sanitary sewer in Munroe Road from Hudson Road a distance of 1055 feet, more or less, southwesterly to 120 feet, more or less, southwest of Underwood Avenue; and 341 Hudson Road from Spring Street a distance of 1.67 feet, more or less, southeasterly to 130 feet more or less, southeast of Munroe Road. (Selectmen's feet, Orders, '63) Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to go into Executive Session for the purpose of dis- Executive cussing, deliberating, or voting on a matter which, Session if made public, might adversely affect the public security, the financial interest of the Town, or the reputation of any person. The meeting adjourned at 10:20 P.M. A true record, Attest : jecix�;;ivet ((lerki Solectme I