Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-12-16-HFA-min.pdf HANSCOM FIELD ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE MEETING December 16, 1986 In attendance were Jim Merageas FAA Dick Nabors Jet Aviation Bill Sohni NBAA J.M Wraga Beechcraft Bob Lombardo Beechcraft Brad Counihan Acton Jane Farmer LWV Larry Muray Raytheon N J Fredkin Raytheon Ben Obear AOPA Ted Jule HPA Robert Domnitz Merriam Hill Assoc Joyce Hals MPA Jo Rita Jordan Carlisle Rick Hill Concord Iris Wheaton CAPA 1 The minutes were approved, as presented 2 Memorandum of Understanding - Norm Fredkin asked for comments on the revised draft he prepared Jane Farmer brought up the subject of members missing meetings frequently and how this should be handled The discussion centered on it being the Chairman ' s responsibility to note absences of more than two in a row, and then review the situation The Commission also noted that at the meetings, the table should be reserved for voting members The voting procedure was also discussed Norm Fredkin advised that the Commission reaches consensus, but doesnt vote This has worked well in the past Jane Farmer made a motion that the version, prepared by Norm Fredkin become the new version Members agreed 3 Noise Subcommittee Meeting - Rick Hill reviewed the results of the meeting that was held to discuss the MEPA comments on the GEIR MEPA has incorporated the main points expressed through comments from the public Joyce Hals reviewed the method Massport will use to respond to the comments, which were to a very large extent related to noise issues Bob Domnitz asked if Massport will include mitigating measures in the response and was advised that mitigating measures could not be discussed in a meaningful way unless the actual cause of a problem is known Ben Obear asked that noise measurements at Route 128 be used as a comparison of noise at Hanscom Joyce Hals responded that the two types of noise are difficult to compare and would not recommend including it in the final GEIR 4 Operations Subcommittee Letter to Massport - Bill Sohni, nominated to be the new chairperson, distributed the draft of a letter prepared by Sandy Sanford Following some discussion, it was agreed that the subcommittee meet, review the points in the letter and rewrite it 5 Statistics and Planning - Joyce Hals discussed the complaints report and noted that due to a substantial increase in noise complaints from the Manor area in Lexington, and from one person in the North Lexington area, the job of investigating each complaint has become very difficult for Jim Mereages In the future, each complaint will be screened by Massport, and if it appears to be of a significant or unusual nature it will be referred to the FAA Massport will continue to keep track of all complaints and respond to each one 6 Other - It was stated that both Bill Sohni and Brad Counihan had received approval from Town boards and were officially members of the Commission MASSACHUSETTS PORT AUTHORITY HANSCOM FIELD STATE OF HANSCOM January 12, 1987 STATE OF HANSCOM JANUARY 15, 1986 INTRODUCTION Each year the Massachusetts Port Authority, Massport, provides the Hanscom Field Advisory Commission with a report on Hanscom' s development projects and business projections for the coming year This report, known as the "Hanscom Field Business Plan" , enables Commission members to review the various projects with their constituents and voice their comments to the Authority early in the planning stages The Plan is also distributed to the various Town Boards and offers them an opportunity to keep track of the state of Hanscom Field, present and near future This year ' s plan renamed State of Hanscom, will follow the same outlines as last year The plan will review the accomplishments of Fiscal Year 1986 and provide an outline of the projects under consideration for 1987 It will also present a summary of Hanscom' s Fiscal Year 1986 income and expenses and a general outline of capital expenditures projected for the next three to five years SECTION I - A REPORT ON CALENDAR YEAR 1986 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Hanscom Field experienced a decrease of four percent in aircraft operations during calendar year 1986, compared to 1985 as noted on page 2, in Tables 1 and 1(a) The decrease was due to a general decline in itinerant flights during the last six months These are flights which either originate from Hanscom to another airport, or originate at another airport and are destined to arrive at Hanscom In contrast, operations in business jet aircraft increased 9% during the same period The overall reduction in traffic has been mirrored in a decrease in aviation related revenues The contrast to 1985 is significant in that the increase in traffic at that time was attributed to a strong state economy The reasons for the decline are speculative but might be attributable to poorer weather conditions than normal over the past three years Page 1 TABLE 1 RANSCOH FIELD OPERATIONS BY AIRCRAFT GROUP (Total Civil and Military) Group 1983 1984 1985 1986 1 1,433 1,585 1,694 I 1,402 1 2 2,013 2,992 4,234 5,102 3 599 526 336 342 - 4 237 257 292 300 5 739 625 555 830 6 709 581 285 170 7 537 535 270 i 226 8 42 19 0 44 9 789 426 102 7£ 10 173 128 175 98 11 550 250 351 314 12 10 19 22 14 13 8,688 7,175 7,132 7 , 668 14 146 156 212 62 15 14,428 16,463 14,753 12 , 388 16 188,373 197,393 217,021 203, 000 219,466 229,130 247,434 __ J _232,110 Page 2 TABLE 3 (a) Group Aircraft Type 1 Citation 500, 501, 550 2 Falcon 10, 50, 100; Lear 35, 36, 55; Sabre 65; Westwind 1124; HS 125-700, -400 with TFE-731 engines; Challenger 600, 601; Citation 600 3 Falcon 20; Sabre 75, 80 4 Lear 23, 24, 25, 28; BAC 1-11; Commodore 1121 5 Gulfstream 2 and 3 6 Sabre 40, 60, 70 7 HS 125-400, -600; Jetstar 2; Unidentified business jets; Miscellaneous military jets A-10, A-6, A-4, T-38, T-33, C-137, F-111, F-16, F-15 8 Jetstar 1; C-140 (military) 9 T-39 (military) 10 C-141 (military) 11 L-188; CV-440, DC-3, C-130 (military), G-159, SW-3; Miscella- neous heavy 4-engine piston and turboprop 12 C-5A, C-135 (military) 13 Helicopters (civil and military) 14 T-43 (military) , C-9 (military); DC-9, B727, B737 15 All light 2-engine piston prop and turboprop aircraft (civil and military); T-44 (military) 16 All remaining operations The large majority are single-engine propeller-driven aircraft; also included are operations by aircraft and helicopters flying through Hanscom's airspace but which never take off or land at Hanscom. Page 3 REVIEW OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF FISCAL YEAR 1986 In spite of the decreased traffic, several airport improvement and planning projects were completed, as planned For the most part, they were listed in the 1985 Business Plan under Section II - Development Opportunities for 1986 and the Future Projects discussed on last year ' s plan which were not substantially completed during FY86 will be discussed under Section II, Opportunities for 1987 and Beyond Objective #1 Development of Virginia Road Site for T-Hanaars Corporate Hangars and Limited Fixed Base Operator Hangars The 15 5 acre land area adjacent to Virginia Road, known as the Pine Hill area has been partially developed to accommodate light aircraft Thirty T-hangars, 32 x 41 square feet were completed in June to accommodate single engine aircraft with a maximum wing span of 37 feet In addition, eight corporate sized hangars, 42 x 56 s f were built for twin engine aircraft The hangars are fully occupied and 70 pilots are on a newly created waiting list The best use for the remaining parcel of land will be discussed in the section dealing with future development Objective #2 Conduct a Site Plan/Design Guideline Study for the Civil Terminal Area The land designated in the Master Plan for future aviation uses near the Civil Terminal area was studied during 1986 The purpose of the study was to provide Massport with a set of guidelines to be used whenever any improvements or development should occur in the area, and also to show how the area can be made more attractive to the user and visitor It was deemed important that the Civil Terminal area reflect both the rural setting of the neighboring towns and the general aviation atmosphere which prevails For this reason the Plan places a heavy emphasis on landscaping and design guidelines for future buildings The consulting team of Greiner Engineering and Carr Lynch Associates was hired for a two phase study that provides Massport with a planning guide for any future development or changes in uses for the area, five and ten years into the future The study started in November, 1986 The study Page 4 team, working with Massport staff, reviewed existing uses, and interviewed hangar tenants and flight schools, to better understand their future facility requirements In addition, a questionnaire was distributed to all tie-down and t-hangar customers for the same purpose Based on this work and projections for growth at Hanscom in the next ten years, several draft proposals were evaluated by Massport staff and discussed with Hanscom users and the Hanscom Field Advisory Commission Exhibit 2 provides a guideline for phasing potential development which will be studied in the more detailed section of the study The second phase will include a more detailed analysis of the plan, including definitive costs to implement the suggested improvements An environmental assessment for any proposed changes and a schedule of how to implement the Massport inspired improvements will be included in the second phase report It is important to note that any significant project will be accompanied by a report to the Hanscom Field Advisory Commission and an Environmental Notification Form will be filed with the Secretary of Environmental Affairs, Massachusetts Environmental Protection Act (MEPA) Unit Objective #3 Suonort a Healthy Fixed Base Operator Environment MASSPORT believes that general aviation benefits from a strong, healthy competitive environment of reliable fixed base operators who can offer a variety of services to pilots Both Beechcraft-East and Jet Aviation have reviewed their short and long-term requirements and whenever possible Massport has worked to accommodate their needs Beechcraft-East currently leases two hangars on the Air Force side of the field They believe the current location makes it difficult to market their services since access is inconvenient and the buildings are World War II relics Massport has identified a site next to the Civil Terminal area for Beechcraft to build a new Air Center One facility comprised of a 4500 square feet building The building will enableBeechcraft to merge the sales and operational staff and will also serve as a center where both based and transient pilots may plan their flights and arrange for aviation services Plans also include a change in the way transient aircraft are handled They are now parked near the FAA tower and pilots and passengers are brought to and from the aircraft by van The plan would allow transient aircraft to park closer to the terminal and most tie-down aircraft now parked near the terminal will be relocated to several other ramp areas Plans for Page 5 n the facility are now being developed according to the new design guidelines being implemented by Massport for all new construction Beechcraft anticipates completing the building during the 1987 construction season Jet Aviation, originally based in Hangar 2, has recently occupied its new hangar The hangar is 43 , 500 square feet and includes modern offices facing the field It has been located to take advantage of a full view to and from the field for sales of services Jet Aviation aircraft, recently stored in Beechcraft hangars will be relocated to the new hangar Jet Aviation hopes to provide better service to based and transient operators Objective #4 Prepare a Generic Environmental Report Massport distributed a Draft Generic Environmental Impact Report (GEIR) in June, 1986 The GEIR was filed according to the scope of work requested by the MEPA and reviewed in detail with members of the Hanscom Field Advisory Commission The purpose of the GEIR is to respond to concerns expressed by the communities in the area surrounding Hanscom Field about the potential effects such growth would have on the environment The study focuses on environmental impacts of Hanscom Field operations on noise, ground traffic, air quality, water resources, land use, infrastructure and cultural and recreational resources The results of the study provided Massport with an idea of how development and increased operations would impact the environment based on a two or five percent growth in operations over the next five years The conclusions reinforced the policy objectives of allowing incremental growth to occur at the field while maintaining an acceptable environment The report concludes that while aircraft activity may indeed grow in the next years, the newer and quieter engines are anticipated to mitigate any significant impact The study also showed, as expected, that any commercial development on Hanscom land would have an impact on the ground traffic in the area and some mitigating measures would be required if any development were to take place Copies of the draft report were distributed to the Hanscom Field Advisory Commission and to Selectmen, Planning Boards, Conservation Commissions Page 6 n and Metropolitan Area Planning Council members in the towns having representation on the Commission Public hearings were held in Bedford, Concord, Lexington and Lincoln Comments were forwarded to MEPA and recently Massport received a letter from MEPA outlining changes they will require before a final GEIR is filed It is anticipated that the final report will be distributed in early 1987 Objective # 5 Continue the Transition Zone Study The Transition Zone Study was initiated several years ago by Massport to give the towns and Massport an opportunity to plan for mutually compatible uses of land surrounding Hanscom in areas designated by each town Massport recently distributed a set of maps to each town to help in this endeavor The maps define the limits of Massport property and the surrounding areas They show the noise impact areas, defined as day/night average sound levels (Ldn) contour lines, wetlands, zoning, recreational use, and parklands It is expected that the maps will prove useful to better understand what type of land uses should be considered as compatible in the study area The study also looked at Lincoln' s proposed 47 acre plan for moderate income housing and commercial development Finding an acceptable definition of compatible use will be the next task of the study Objective # 6 Reexamine Noise Rules The Noise Rules for Hanscom Field, published in 1981, were reviewed with the Hanscom Field Advisory Commission and interested pilots These rules include a surcharge for all aircraft operating between the hours of 11 P M and 7 A M The purpose of the surcharge is to discourage nighttime flying and reduce aircraft noise in the neighboring towns The review attempted to relieve the owners of aircraft flying relatively quiet aircraft from paying a surcharge for all operations from the hours of 11 p m to 7 a m Following several meeting at which various options were discussed, it became clear to Massport that any changes in the rules would not be well received by the communities A decision was reached not to amend the rules Objective # 7 Consider Establishment of a Public Picnic Area Massport considered the possibility of establishing a public picnic area in the vicinity of Route 2A Following a review of the concept, Page 7 it was determined that a picnic area would be difficult to manage with the limited number of Hanscom staff and the idea has been postponed for consideration to a later date Objective # 8 Review of the Master Plan Massport has reviewed the plan and we feel the policies are still valid and we do not see a need to update the Plan The Terminal Area Site Plan and the information gathered during the GEIR process indicates that no new airfield capacity is required Staff review of specific policies in the Plan indicate that only one policy statement with regard to the size of commuter aircraft required updating This change was anticipated when the Plan was published, and was taken fully into account during the publication of the Noise Rules in 1981 All Master Plan copies distributed in the future will have a notation to indicate that the change has taken place The environmental sections that were noted will, in the future, be covered in the periodic updates of the GEIR, the Terminal Area Site Plan and the Annual Noise Review The State of Hanscom also annually previews future plans under consideratioin All specific proposals undergo environmental review Section II - Onnortunities for 1987 and the Future In addition to continuing the general policy of improving the airfield to serve the aviation needs of the area, Massport will pursue the following projects over the next several years Objective # 1 Development Plan for Remaining Land at Virginia Road Now Known as the Pine Hill Area The remaining acres at Pine Hill are expected to accommodate future demand for more t-hangars, small corporate hangars and limited fixed base operator hangars In view of the limited size of the land and utility requirements, a detailed site plan will be drawn so that the area can be properly developed Page 8 Objective # 2 Complete the Civil Terminal Area Site Plan Phase 2 of the Civil Terminal Site Plan should be completed The report, will include a set of design guidelines, a revised Airport Layout Plan showing new airside and landside improvements contemplated during the next ten years, a well defined estimate of the costs for the various improvements; a construction scheduleand an environmental assessment of each project This plan will provide Massport with an excellent tool to assess future projects Objective # 3 Complete the Generic Environmental Report The Draft GEIR was reviewed by MEPA following the public comment period Several issues, mostly relating to noise, have been singled out as requiring revision The Authority is in the process of reviewing the comments and discussing the additional work required with the consultants who provided the input into the Draft Massport plans to review the changes with the communities, before issuing a final version of the GEIR MEPA will, in its scope of work, suggest the frequency of publishing updated versions Massport anticipates it will be at the least on a five year basis, unless changes in environmental factors dictate an earlier date Objective # 4 Work with Tenants and Potential Tenants to Provide Adeauate Air and Landside Facilities Massport will continue to work with tenants, users, and other aviation interests to develop and expand the facilities required to support Hanscom' s civil and general aviation activity Any projects which require major expenditures for facilities will be preceded by filing an Environmental Notification Form (ENF) and reviewby the Hanscom Field Advisory Commission Several of the projects listed have already been included in the 1985 airport improvements program, to be shown in Section III Massport Sponsored Airport Improvement Prolects 1 Civil Apron Liohtina - Massport will install tower flood lighting along the east and west Civil Terminal ramps where flood lighting does not exist The lights are expected to improvesafety and airport security Page 9 2 Perimeter Security Fencing. - This work will include installation of airport security chain link fencing along the airport boundary at the northeast corner of the airfield, and replacement of existing fencing in the Lynnfield Street area of the field The fencing will be 8 high and have one or more locked vehicle access gates at appropriate locations 3 Maintenance Building Expansion - Massport will expand the maintenance building to accommodate snow removal equipment The building will also contain a small office which will be used as a fire/security service and a sand storage shed 4 Rehabilitate the Civil Terminal Building - Massport is planning to make improvements to the interior of the building The restrooms will be modernized, hallways and stairways will have the ceilings lowered, and new lighting fixtures will be installed The electrical system will be overhauled and improved to meet the growing demand for power from tenants using computers A new oil tank will be installed and some improvements made to the heating system 5 Design a Hangar Facility for Limited Fixed Base Operators A number of small companies has indicated interest in renting hangar space to conduct aircraft maintenance for light aircraft, and a recent survey of pilots based at Hanscom indicated strong demand for this type of service The area designated for this type of activity is the Pine Hill Area A site plan for the area, and a specific building plan will be developed If the project is found viable from an operations and business point of view, the Authority will consider building a hangar for this purpose 6 Water System Improvements - It has become clear that if any expansion of facilities in the Civil Terminal area is to take place, a general upgrading of the system may be required A study is underway to determine if any changes will be needed Plans will be developed if any changes are determined to be necessary 7 New Tie-down and Car Parking Area - During the study of the Civil Terminal area and planning process to accommodate the new Jet Aviation hangar and Beechcraft Air Center One, it became necessary to plan for the relocation of tie-downs on the ramps near the terminal A new site has been designated near the base of the FAA Tower, where transient aircraft are now parked A new automobile parking area to accommodate 75 cars and 100 aircraft is also been planned for this area Page 10 8 Improvements to Drainaae System on the Airport - During an annual inspection of the field, it was noted that the drainage inlets including wash out areas, inlets, and pipes need repairs The appropriate work will be done to correct the problems 9 Tree and Brush Removal - The Federal Aviation Administration has instructed the Authority to remove some brush and shrubs 400 feet on each side of the Runway 11 Instrument Landing System towers The purpose of the clearing is to improve visibility and safety 10 Slurry Coat on Runway Over Run Areas - The ends of Runways 11 and 29 , plus the runway shoulders on all four runways have cracks A slurry coat and crack filling project will be undertaken to remedy the problem 12 Small Emeraencv Generator for the Pine Hill T-Hanaars - The hangars are equipped with electrical doors In the event that power is lost during a storm, the doors will be very difficult to open A small generator is proposed, similar to the one now at the old T-hangar site, as a way of dealing with power loss 13 Improvements to Hangar 2 - The Authority has determined that Hangar 2 may be leased to Jet Aviation for an additional five year term To improve the quality of working conditions in the hangar, plans are being discussed to insulate the building and provide better heating 14 Extension of the Ramo West of the New Jet Aviation Hangar The Civil Terminal Site Plan has shown that an extension of the ramp area will provide Jet Aviation with a better opportunity to park and serve the transient aircraft in this area Massport will considerthe concept and will review the need in detail prior to committing the project 15 Extension of the Ramo Area North of the Civil Terminal - Existingtie-downs in the terminal area include a number of flight school aircraft Massport believes that it is important for the schools to have aircraft parked as close as possible to the Terminal so that students can maximize their class time and have the aircraft readily available for each lesson A site has been designated, as part of the Civil Terminal Site Plan, for the new ramp More specific plans will be developed at the time a commitment is made to proceed with the project Page 11 17 Bedford Land Purchase Massport is considering the purchase of a 50 acre parcel of land located in Bedford, abutting Hanscom Field The parcel is located within the 65 Ldn contour line MASSPORT believes the land should not be developed for housing and is therefore considering purchase of the property to preclude this type of use 18 Lincoln 47 Acre Development Land Swan Massport has been asked to exchange property with Cranberry Hill Associates, the owner of the recently rezoned commercial portion of 47 acres abutting Hanscom Field The rezoning was done to accommodate 120 units of housing and a 120, 000 S F office building All parties agree that a realigned Old Bedford Road would provide better utilitization of the site and also improve the roadway itself We have been asked to consider transfers of property in order to facilitate the realignment Massport ' s response to the proposal will be given, following detailed consideration of all issues and problems associated with the realigned roadway, building commercial development in the area, and building housing in such close vicinity to the airport Avigation easements, future uses of Massport property abutting the 47 acres and other environmental concerns will also be discussed at this time Tenant Sponsored Airport Proiects 1 Patriot Aviation Hanoar Patriot Aviation, a flight school, will work with Massport to plan and construct a hangar on a site designated for this use in the proposed new layout of the Civil Terminal area The plan is to build a facility which will meet several purposes Among the uses will be a maintenance facility for Patriot aircraft, a customer parts department, an aircraft showroom, office space and an avionics repair shop The proposed building will be a 10, 000 s f hangar with 500 s f of office space It will be designed and built in compliance Page 12 with the design guidelines Aircraft will be stored inside and outside of the hangar An Environmental Notification Form will be filed with MEPA and the project will be reviewed with the Hanscom Field Advisory Commission 2 Airport Motel Massport is planning to request bids for the construction of a limited service airport motel This type of motel has no conference nor dining facilities During the first phase of the Civil Terminal Area Site plan, several parcels of land have been shown as optimal for non-hangar type development Because of the elevation and distances from the ramp areas, they are considered too costly to develop for this purpose Massport recently learned that aviation clients have had difficulty in obtaining lodging in the area Pilots and their passengers alike find that they must sometimes drive 15 to 20 miles to obtain a room A company recently approached Massport and requested the opportunity to develop a motel at Hanscom After giving the matter consideration, and assessing the traffic impact on the roadways, a decision was reached that the concept was a good one and should be pursued During the next few months a request for proposal package will be developed and discussed with the Hanscom Field Advisory Commission Page 13 Section III - An Analysis of Financial Operations A review of Hanscom' s financial performance for FY' 86 indicates revenues were slightly lower, by less than one percent Both tiedown and landing fees were lower, hangar rentals, rental car commissions and ground servicing revenues decreased Rentals from the Civil Terminal, and other properties increased Revenues from the flight schools also increased, reflecting the trend seen in the past several years Unfortunately, operating expenses increased by $300, 000 resulting in a deficit of $213, 000 The sixteen percent increase was a result of rising costs at every level Table 2 provides a breakdown of revenues and operating expenses for the fiscal years 1984 , 1985, 986 and projected for 1987 As can be seen, the expectation is for an even higher deficit in the next year Attention is being paid to this problem, and efforts made to correct the situation Fees for FY 87 have been raised for tiedowns and landing fees and transient parking fees were also increased A number of hangar leases are being renegotiated These changes should reflect higher revenues in the months to come and other revenue sources will be investigated during the next year as well Table 3 outlines some of the capital expenditures suggested for the next ten years and projects the anticipated expenses It should be noted that many of these suggested projects, if approved, will be subsidized by general Authority revenues and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airport improvement funds The funds expended by Massport are included in the financial analysis Proposed projects which are anticipated to yield revenues, such as new T-hangars will be expected to pay for themselves over a period of time Table 3 is shown on the following page Page 14 Table 2 MASSACHUSETTS PORT AUTHORITY .., Hanscom Field Analysis of Financial Operations Fiscal 1984, 1985, 1986 & 1987 (Projected--In Thousands) 1984 1985 1986 1987 (Pro, ) REVENUES Fees: Tiedowns $79 5.56% $86 5.45% $80 5.107 $125 7 67% Landing Fees 5 0.35% 5 0,32% 4 0.26% 5 0.31% Utilities 85 5.98% 92 5.83% 90 5.74% 93 5.71% Rentals. Terminal 154 10.83% 235 14 88% 245 15.63% 293 17 98% Hangar/Cargo 515 36.22% 538 34.07% 529 33.74% 488 29 94% Ground/Land 195 13.71% 213 13.49% 235 14.99% 236 14.48% Other Rents 17 1.20% 17 1 08% 17 1.08% 17 1.04% Commissions. Fuel Flowage 215 15.12% 217 13.74% 219 13.97% 225 13 8n% R;ntal Cars 61 4.29% 58 3.67% 53 7 38% 50 3.07' Flight Schools 23 1.62% 28 1.77% 31 1 98% 28 1 72% Ground Servicing 16 1.13% 23 1.46% 20 1,28% '9 1.17% Other 19 1.34% 17 1 08% 20 1.28% 20 1.27 Other Revenues 38 2.67% 50 ' 17% 25 1.59" '1 1707. T .a. Revenues :22 '00. .% .179 'd0.ar; 1,568 1' vn% S70 leu? 6% OPERATING EXPENSES Administration 231 246 315 316 Maintenance 609 588 613 720 Utilities 165 179 182 164 Indirects: insurance 30 34 55 254 Professional Fees etc. 82 63 134 101 Security 0 71 105 132 Other 50 61 106 146 S & A Allocation 200 239 271 304 Total Operating Expenses 1,367 1,481 1,781 2,137 Net Revenues $55 $98 ($213) ($507) CAPITAL EXPENDITURES Maintenance Reserve $873 $1,720 $561 $679 I Improvement & Extension 586 66 1,434 665 I Total Capital Expenses 1,459 1,786 1,995 1,344 Less Grant Receipts 372 305 352 0 II Net Capital Expenses $1,087 $1,481 $1,643 $1,344 Page 15 Table 3 Capital Expenditure Program FY86 -FY96 Improvement & Extenkion Estimated Cost New tiedown and parking at Tower 140, 000 Remark taxilane and plug tiedowns 50, 000 Field Apron lighting & fence 586, 000 Water Meters 30, 000 Sprinkler systems 450, 000 Civil Terminal utilities upgrade 2,200, 000 Inground Lights Juliet to Echo Taxiway 50, 000 Limited FSO Hangar 1,000, 000 New Ramp North Civil Terminal 440, 000 New Ramp West of Jet Aviation 720, 000 New Taxiways Lima & Delta 800, 000 Landscaping & Signs - Civil Terminal Area 150, 000 Helio Hangar Rehabilitation 200, 000 Relocate East Coast Aerotech 2,500, 000 Commuter Terminal & Parking Lot 1,000,000 Civil Terminal Canopy 100,000 50 New T-hanagrs 1, 300, 000 80 New Hangars 2,000, 000 Picnic Area 50, 000 New Ramp West of ECAT 841, 000 New Helipad 300, 000 Page 16 A Maintenance Reserve Clean up Executive Flyers Fuel Farm $110,000 Hanscom Airfield Cable Rehabilitation $950, 000 Hangar 2 Rehabilitation A (1987) $120,000 B (1992) $300,000 Coffee Shop Expansion A (1988) $ 83, 000 B (1993) $220, 000 Slurry Coat Overrun of Runways 29/11 $100,000 Repaint all runways/taxiways $ 75, 000 Page 17 \, T 1 �. .. SS • r^ SOI fw i 1 ' :--v-- z- 'rt..'" ..- '-';‘.-"--.-- t--- j -,..• (17---fr tr---":"--- ' lil \\\ !'`rya' .✓fit i..\M"-5:4-1 f. , S� ° •h -1-skit `� 'o \`¢: t. s`.« " 4 / 4 Y " tF! ,th71 .14' WrI 1 r =,���'.'4 :•µc� fNW' ' F:M. '.:•� 4i,, �.^-pori \it 4 t.� t•"9 4 � � 11\\\t ) . i a‘ Iii L irk 1.-. . -, .../_,,, ---- V ',stip.? ,, _,---, i �1 F... ` 1 y..' � .'.'t .�. " Yl{1 ayJ 1 is c §!^` FIl6i.i- •y.• : Y s.... .:,/ IT kms...�_ . ` , C4 # ,\ l x Y�r, !:TDI 'x rt--ti J 1 ti i---: A i\\‘ .'"" 1 ' \\\\\\ ,, leVic .. �� / s r \. • • Z ill l ` �x..n '*.:11-- ..4,-4- 1 la I. t- �. c.pHk :fits% � . =: /°, • c 'Jr: - � .� of ¢x..ro :�' oaf •�«`r• �.. J{ �'F 0 2. :" E. 1. z , ' ,.1••} ^_i J' by /I. • J`' '+ s it ill I. fes •1 . ' .„--A+__• �,, 'AC i.` <,.1. „JQ' 4f\-' - i 4 page IS \ EXxlaiz 2 1 t Ii M t 1144,C:3 ive JJ „\„7\ç \ 7-c- vitt?' o • I j , > , t t r a ` „.„,-:„<„-;t( 1. ttis 1 j TTFF•� Noir 4 .k\ $. \L1-- 17 . . PPP :14, _ Ct r \k‘ 19 Page