HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-07-31-PB-min-copy
Lexington Planning Board Meeting Minutes
July 31, 2024
Page 1 of 11
Minutes of the Lexington Planning Board
Held on Wednesday July 31, 2024, Virtual Meeting at 6:00 pm
Planning Board members present: Michael Schanbacher, Chair; Robert Creech, Vice-Chair; Melanie
Thompson, Clerk; Robert Peters, and Charles Hornig.
Also present were: Abby McCabe, Planning Director; Sheila Page, Assistant Planning Director; Carol
Kowalski, Assistant Town Manager for Development; and Kiruthika Ramakrishnan, Planning Coordinator.
Michael Schanbacher, Chair of the Planning Board, called to order the meeting of the Lexington Planning
Board on Wednesday, July 31, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. For this meeting, the Planning Board is convening by
video conference via Zoom. Lex Media is filming this meeting and is recording it for future viewing here.
The Chair explained the process and the procedure of the meeting.
Mr. Schanbacher conducted a roll call to ensure all members of the Planning Board and members of staff
present could hear and be heard.
Mr. Schanbacher provided a summary of instructions for members of the public in attendance. It was
further noted that materials for this meeting are available on the Town's Novus Packet dashboard. The
Board will go through the agenda in order.
Development Administration
85 Pleasant St. – Public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision application to subdivide the lot into
four lots
Ms. McCabe informed the Board that on review of the definitive subdivision application, the staff felt that
the application was incomplete and had asked the applicant to consider withdrawing the application. Ms.
McCabe added that based on the staff’s suggestion, the applicant has submitted a written request to
withdraw their application.
The applicant was represented by Trina Murphy of DND Homes who explained to the Board that they
would like more time to work on their proposal and would like the opportunity to come back to the
Planning Board at a later date if they wish. Therefore, she requested the application be withdrawn without
prejudice.
Mr. Creech moved to accept the Applicant's request to withdraw the definitive subdivision application
without prejudice for 85 Pleasant Street. Ms. Thompson seconded the motion. The Planning Board
voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0 (Roll call: Creech – yes; Peters – yes; Schanbacher – yes; Thompson –
yes; Hornig – yes). MOTION PASSED
Mr. Creech moved to allow the chair to sign the decision. Ms. Thompson seconded the motion. The
Planning Board voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0 (Roll call: Creech – yes; Peters – yes; Schanbacher –
yes; Thompson – yes; Hornig – yes). MOTION PASSED
Lexington Planning Board Meeting Minutes
July 31, 2024
Page 2 of 11
329 & 331 Concord Ave. – Public hearing for major site plan review of a proposal for a multi-
family development in the village overlay district
Mr. Schanbacher opened the public hearing on the application of Cabot, Cabot, & Forbes for major site
plan review under §135-7.5 [Village & Multi-Family Overlay Districts] and §135-9.5 [Site Plan Review] of
the Zoning Bylaw and Article VI of §181-71 [Stormwater Management Regulations] at 331 Concord
Avenue. The applicant team included: Jay Doherty, Quinlan Locke, Nick Dellacava, Ian Ramey, Steve
Prestejohn, and Allie Sullivan.
Mr. Doherty from Cabot, Cabot and Forbes (CCF) shared a graph which showed the historical and
forecasted housing production and rent growth, stated that rents have been rising at about 3.4% which
was significantly higher than the average inflation, and gave an overview of the rising cost of construction
and its impact on housing production. Mr. Doherty said that it typically takes five years from start to
occupancy for projects of this size.
Mr. Locke, project manager from CCF, gave a brief overview of the project and gave details of the meetings
with Planning staff and the abutters.
Mr. Dellacava, project engineer from Allen & Major Associates, Inc, shared the existing conditions survey,
site plan, grading and drainage plan, and utilities plan and gave details about the proposed project. Mr.
Dellacava explained there is shallow bedrock and ledge on the property. One curb cut is proposed and
closing of two of the existing curb cuts. Parking spaces are proposed in the front for the commercial use,
a rideshare drop off pick up area in the front with a loop to cars to turn around, garage entry in the rear
of the new building, three loading zones and trash/recycling enclosures, a children’s play area, an outdoor
bike storage area, and emergency fire access loops around the building. Underground infiltration and
detention basis are proposed for stormwater management. All stormwater will be recharged and
infiltrated. They intend to file an RDA with the Conservation Commission.
Mr. Ramey, the landscape architect with Copley Wolf, shared the landscape plan, proposed site features,
proposed site planting plan, and tree plan, and explained in detail. Mr. Ramey explained the two mature
trees at the front of the property will be preserved. The project proposes plantings between the terraced
retaining walls, evergreen plantings along the Minuteman village, a lot of the vegetation in the back will
be untouched, and an accessible play area, but understands staff also recommended the play area be
relocated and they are looking into that. All proposed trees will be native, some stones will be reused on
site for tree protections, and tree grates will be provided.
Mr. Prestejohn, the architect from CUBE 3, gave an overview of the design approach and went over the
constraints due to ledge and grading. Mr. Prestejohn presented the four-story building in three segments
that slope back with the grading of the land. Mr. Prestejohn also went over the floor plans, side section
view, and elevations in detail.
Staff Comments
Lexington Planning Board Meeting Minutes
July 31, 2024
Page 3 of 11
Ms. McCabe reminded the Board that the application was filed under the original 2023 Zoning for MBTA
Communities and that the property was subject to a zoning freeze making the zoning amendments that
were subsequently made to regulate the height of the building in relation to the area of commercial space
not apply. Ms. McCabe also reminded everyone that this was a site plan review application and if the
project complies with the Zoning bylaw, the Planning Board cannot legally deny the project and also that
the applicant has to file with the Conservation Commission. Ms. McCabe also went over the three waivers
that were requested by the applicant which were for parking in front of the building, to allow some of the
bike parking spaces to be lifted and not all ground-mounted, and relief from the 2-ft. by 6-ft. bike parking
space. Ms. McCabe summarized the staff comments outlined in the staff memo from Ms. Page, which
included a request to unbundle the parking spaces from the unit rents, support for the 1:3 parking ratio,
and asked for more details on the tree removal analysis to confirm the requirements of the Tree Bylaw
are met.
Ms. Barrett, Transportation Manager, added that she recommends a bus shelter on Concord Avenue, that
there were opportunities here such as with the 128 Business Council Shuttle that goes to Alewife, and
said that the applicant had reached out to her to come up with solutions to enhance transit services and
they will be meeting with her soon to discuss further.
Peer Reviewer’s Comments
Mike Carter from GCG Associates gave a brief summary of the findings of the peer review conducted by
him to review the stormwater and sewer plans submitted by the applicant. Mr. Carter informed the Board
that there were a few technical items that have to be addressed by the applicant and there were no major
issues that had to be dealt with, but they requested some plan updates and updated documentation. He
also noted that the sight visibility should be checked on Concord Avenue.
Board Questions
Mr. Creech wanted clarification on Mr. Carter’s report regarding the stormwater maintenance plan. Mr.
Carter provided the details. His concern had to do with the ability to access equipment that would be
located underground. Mr. Carter replied that this is TBD at a later stage of design.
Mr. Hornig asked the applicant if he would be able to address the issues brought out by staff and the peer
reviewer. Mr. Locke responded saying that all the issues put forth by staff and the peer reviewer are
addressable and they will work on it.
Mr. Peters asked Mr. Doherty about the experience he had in communities that had to set aside more
than 15% of the construction for inclusionary housing. Mr. Doherty responded that in Wakefield they had
dealt with 18% inclusionary housing but that anything over 15% is challenging. Mr. Peters asked Mr. Locke
about the mitigation plan for ledge removal and blasting on the site. Mr. Locke responded that they are
working with consultants to come up with a noise and vibration monitoring plan that would comply with
Lexington’s noise bylaws. Mr. Peters stated that the preference of the Board is not to have parking in front
of the building other than short term parking and asked if the applicant has explored other options. Mr.
Doherty stated that the parking in front was for retail customers. Mr. Locke added that with the
Lexington Planning Board Meeting Minutes
July 31, 2024
Page 4 of 11
topography of the site, it would be difficult to put parking in different areas on the site, especially with
regards to ADA accessibility regulations. Mr. Peters also wanted to know what type of retail uses the
applicant was planning to look for. Mr. Doherty responded that it was too early to predict the type of
business.
Ms. Thompson asked the applicant about their experience in their other buildings with just one way in
and one way out for the entire complex. Mr. Locke said that it depends on the site and the ledge conditions
and grading play a role in this particular site. Ms. Thompson also wanted to know the access points for
buildings, especially the ones that are located in the interiors of the buildings. Mr. Prestejohn explained
the means to access them from the lobby. Ms. Thompson also wanted to know the location of inclusionary
units in the building. Mr. Locke shared the plans which showed the locations of inclusionary housing units
in the building. Ms. Thompson also mentioned that the applicant can find space for bike storage instead
of applying for the bike waiver. Mr. Locke informed Ms. Thompson that they are working with the bicycle
advisory committee to arrive at solutions.
Mr. Creech asked for security cameras on site, relocation of the play area, and fencing around the site
other than vinyl fencing. He suggested non-vinyl fencing that would be low maintenance. Mr. Creech also
wanted details of the base ground material for snow storage. Mr. Ramey responded that it will be a lawn
of some sorts that would be irrigated. Mr. Creech also wanted details on the modular blocks on the
retaining walls in the front of the property. Mr. Ramey gave the details of the retaining walls and stated
that it would give superior engineering performance due to the engineered wall and would also be
aesthetically pleasing. Mr. Creech also asked for perspective renderings of the building from different
directions including from the April Lane side of the property. Mr. Schanbacher agreed with Mr. Peters that
it is important to know the details of the type of prospective retail tenants. He also agreed with Mr. Peters
on not favoring parking in the front of the building. Mr. Schanbacher also wanted to know if the HVAC
equipment will be on the roof and if it will be properly screened. Mr. Schanbacher also wanted details of
trash handling inside the building. Mr. Prestejohn explained the trash handling in detail.
Mr. Creech wanted to know the frequency of trash pickup due to the size of the building. Ms. Sullivan
from CC&F gave details of the typical frequency.
Public Comments
Barbara Katzenberg, 37 Moon Hill Road, favored having rental housing in Lexington, was happy that noise
and vibration consultants will be involved in the project, and asked for a third-party surveying company
for conducting pre-blasting surveys.
Jay Luker, 26 Ridge Avenue, voiced his support for the development and felt that multi-family housing
such as this project represents progress towards the Town’s sustainability and diversity goals.
Bob Pressman, 22 Locust Avenue, wanted details of locations where ledge would be removed and also
the volume of ledge that had to be blasted.
Lexington Planning Board Meeting Minutes
July 31, 2024
Page 5 of 11
Tom Shiple, on behalf of the Lexington Bicycle advisory committee, appreciated the applicant’s willingness
to collaborate with the bicycle advisory committee to come up with solutions for bikers.
Kunal Botla, Chair, Transportation Advisory Committee, highlighted the committee’s recommendation for
placement of an enclosed accessible bus shelter which will be a valuable resource for the neighborhood.
Steve Heinrich, Town Meeting member Precinct 3, felt that this was not an appropriate project for this
area and said the project will worsen the existing traffic situation in the neighborhood.
Jeanne Kreiger, 44 Webster Road, asked the Board and the staff if a traffic study would have been required
if the proposal were a Planned Development instead of the Village Overlay.
Rena Maliszewski, 310 Concord Avenue, asked for a traffic study during the regular school year, a winter
view of the development, and for the commercial component of the development to be eliminated.
Mihir Shah, 3 Blossom Street, wanted to know if the Planning Board had done a study on the economic
impact of such a development.
Arleen Chase, on behalf of Temple Emunah, expressed her concern for the children in their preschool,
asked for a robust wall to be built for their safety, and also was concerned about traffic and blasting noise.
Eric Ordoukhanian, 26 April Lane, expressed his concern about traffic and trash and delivery handling.
Sharon Levin, opposed the scale of the property and asked to include Pleasant Street and Spring Street in
the traffic study
Mike Germanetto, 291 Concord Avenue, expressed his concerns about the traffic during construction and
the safety of cyclists and school children.
Mark Stump, 151 Pleasant Street, reiterated the traffic concerns of previous speakers and stated that the
development is not near any public transit.
John Elander, 304 Concord Avenue, expressed his concern regarding flooding and noise pollution that
would become worse due to the proposal.
Mr. Shiple, 18 Phinney Road, speaking for himself expressed his support for the project since he felt that
this development will provide much required rental units for Lexington and asked the applicant to provide
composting and recycling services to the occupants of the development.
Mr. Botla, 40 Grapevine Avenue, speaking for himself, stated that developments such as this will help with
the State’s housing shortage, regardless of the limiting factors and voiced his support for the project.
Mr. Ordoukhanian stated that there is flooding during heavy rains and asked for details of emergency
vehicle access.
Lexington Planning Board Meeting Minutes
July 31, 2024
Page 6 of 11
Ms. Maliszewski stated that she supports affordable housing but was concerned about the scale and
aesthetic of the development and asked the applicant for the forecasted average rental price for the
proposed units.
Mark Terzian, 28 Webster Road, expressed his concern regarding the size of the project and traffic issues
and asked for details about the location of the school bus stop.
Staff Comments
Ms. McCabe explained the process and basis of how the affordable units will be allocated and that this
project was eligible for some local preference for Lexington residents for the inclusionary dwelling units.
Ms. McCabe also explained that since the MBTA Communities law did not permit discretionary approval
or requiring off-site improvements, submission of a traffic study was not required by the Zoning Bylaw or
the Planning Board. With regards to questions related to stormwater runoff, Ms. McCabe said that the
peer review report is reviewing the project for compliance for Stormwater and Conservation Regulations.
Board Comments
Mr. Creech asked the applicant to explain the trash handling process for commercial tenants. Mr. Locke
said usually there will be a trash room within their commercial space that would be picked up by property
management and he would provide more details before the next meeting. Mr. Creech also inquired to the
nature of the noise that would accompany trash pickup. The answer was that it would be somewhat noisy
so Mr. Creech wanted fencing that would deal with metal on metal noise.
Mr. Peters stated that though a traffic study would not be mandatory, it would be helpful to the applicant
and for the Town to plan and execute any roadway infrastructure improvements that may be required.
Mr. Peters said that he supported Mr. Shiple’s comments to provide recycling and composting services to
tenants.
Mr. Schanbacher asked the applicant to revise the site plan in such a way that the infrastructure serves
the tenants and provides utility value. Mr. Schanbacher also asked the applicant to provide more details
of the courtyards. Mr. Schanbacher said that he too does not support surface parking in the front of the
building, as the idea is to promote transit friendly communities. Mr. Schanbacher also asked the applicant
to provide a shadow study depicting the extent of shadow produced by the building. Mr. Schanbacher
encouraged the applicant to come up with a design that articulates the façade a little more, with some
exterior porches.
Mr. Creech moved to continue the public hearing for the site plan review application at 331 Concord
Avenue to Wednesday, August 28 at or after 6:00 pm on Zoom. Ms. Thompson seconded the motion.
The Planning Board voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0 (Roll call: Creech – yes; Peters – yes; Schanbacher
– yes; Thompson – yes; Hornig – yes). MOTION PASSED
The Board recessed at 8:25 p.m. and reconvened at 8:30 p.m.
Lexington Planning Board Meeting Minutes
July 31, 2024
Page 7 of 11
32 Brookside Avenue (formerly 10 Stedman Road) – Continued public hearing to amend the
approved Definitive Subdivision to modify the driveway, drainage system, and turnaround
easement
Mr. Schanbacher opened the continued public hearing on the application of Homes Development Corp to
amend a definitive subdivision plan under §175-6.0 of the Planning Board’s Subdivision Regulations
located at 32 Brookside Avenue - Map 24, Lot 87 in the RS Zoning District. The proposal is to amend the
2010 Definitive Subdivision approval to modify the subsurface drainage structure location and the
hammerhead turnaround area. Mr. Peters informed the Board that though he was absent for the hearing
on June 26th, when this agenda item was last discussed, he has reviewed the tape of the meeting and
meeting materials, filed the certification form, and that he will be participating on this matter today.
The applicant was represented by his attorney Fred Gilgun. Mr. Gilgun acknowledged to the Board that
the applicant has not submitted sufficient supporting information related to Stormwater and
Conservation.
The applicant’s engineer, Michael Novak, shared the site plan and went over the details of the proposed
turnaround expansion and the revisions he had made to accommodate comments from Staff from
Planning and Fire Department. Mr. Novak compared the approved plans from 2013 to the ones he had
created now and explained the specification of the turnaround analysis.
Board Comments
Mr. Hornig wanted details of snow storage locations on the plan and asked Mr. Novak to show it in the
final plan. Mr. Hornig also asked for a swept path analysis for a typical box truck. Mr. Hornig also asked
the applicant for a revised drainage analysis which will comply with requirements of all concerned
departments.
Mr. Creech wanted clarifications on the site plans and the turnaround dimensions. Ms. Thompson also
asked for a revised turnaround analysis and also a detailed comparison of the old and new turnaround
analysis.
Mr. Schanbacher asked the applicant if he planned to reduce the size of the previous easement and Mr.
Gilgun explained that the applicant would want to modify the easement to make it consistent with what
would be as built. Mr. Schanbacher asked the applicant to consider contributing to the affordable housing
trust to make up for the difference in easements.
Mr. Creech agreed with Mr. Schanbacher’s suggestion. Mr. Hornig said that the functionality of the
turnaround and stormwater requirements are more important for him. Mr. Schanbacher clarified that the
functionality of the turnaround and compliance with stormwater requirements are not negotiable for him
and the contribution would be in addition to compliance with the requirements.
Public Comments
Lexington Planning Board Meeting Minutes
July 31, 2024
Page 8 of 11
Bill Vogel, 36 Kendall Road, felt that paving Farmcrest Avenue was a terrible idea.
Ms. McCabe informed the Board about the public comments received via email in the afternoon opposing
paving Farmcrest Avenue to Brookside Avenue and which were forwarded to the Board members. Ms.
McCabe explained that the Planning Board is only considering modifying the turnaround area.
Mr. Creech moved to continue the Public Hearing on the application of Homes Development
Corporation to amend a definitive subdivision plan under chapter 175-6.0 for 32 Brookside Road to
September 11, 2024 at or after 6 p.m. on zoom. Ms. Thompson seconded the motion. The Planning
Board voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0 (Roll call: Creech – yes; Peters – yes; Schanbacher – yes;
Thompson – yes; Hornig – yes). MOTION PASSED
25 Hartwell Avenue – Definitive Subdivision – Acceptance of performance guarantee and plan
endorsement
Ms. McCabe reminded the Board about the meeting on June 26, 2024 when the Planning Board approved
the 3 lot definitive subdivision plan from Greatland Realty Partners LLC for 25 Hartwell Avenue. Now that
the 20-day appeal period has concluded without an appeal, the Board shall accept a performance
guarantee prior to plan endorsement. Ms. McCabe also added that the applicant had submitted a
covenant as a guarantee and that staff has reviewed the covenant and recommended approval.
Mr. Creech moved to accept and sign the covenant submitted by Greatland Realty Partners, LLC for the
25 Hartwell Avenue Definitive Subdivision. Ms. Thompson seconded the motion. The Planning Board
voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0 (Roll call: Creech – yes; Peters – yes; Schanbacher – yes; Thompson –
yes; Hornig – yes). MOTION PASSED
Mr. Creech moved to sign the plans for 25 Hartwell Avenue’s Definitive Subdivision. Ms. Thompson
seconded the motion. The Planning Board voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0 (Roll call: Creech – yes;
Peters – yes; Schanbacher – yes; Thompson – yes; Hornig – yes). MOTION PASSED
40 Hartwell Avenue – Definitive Subdivision – Acceptance of performance guarantee and plan
endorsement
Ms. McCabe reminded the Board about the meeting on June 26, 2024 when the Planning Board approved
the 3-lot definitive subdivision plan from Greatland Realty Partners LLC for 40 Hartwell Avenue. Now that
the 20-day appeal period has concluded without an appeal, the Board shall accept a performance
guarantee prior to plan endorsement. Ms. McCabe also added that the applicant had submitted a
covenant as a guarantee and that staff has reviewed the covenant and recommended approval.
Mr. Creech moved to accept and sign the covenant as a performance guarantee from Greatland Realty
Partners for the Definitive Subdivision at 40 Hartwell Avenue. Ms. Thompson seconded the motion. The
Planning Board voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0 (Roll call: Creech – yes; Peters – yes; Schanbacher –
yes; Thompson – yes; Hornig – yes). MOTION PASSED
Mr. Creech moved that the Board sign the subdivision plans for 40 Hartwell Avenue. Ms. Thompson
seconded the motion. The Planning Board voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0 (Roll call: Creech – yes;
Peters – yes; Schanbacher – yes; Thompson – yes; Hornig – yes). MOTION PASSED
Lexington Planning Board Meeting Minutes
July 31, 2024
Page 9 of 11
Board Administration
Board Member & Staff Updates
Mr. Hornig updated the Board about the Housing Partnership Board’s meeting where they discussed real
estate transfer tax and various proposals in the legislature that are being considered.
Mr. Creech gave updates from the Town Manager search screening committee’s meetings and gave a
timeline of events.
Ms. McCabe informed the Board that the attorney general’s office has approved all the zoning articles
from the Annual Town Meeting. Ms. McCabe also informed the Board that EOHLC had fully approved the
MBTA Communities Zoning.
Review of Draft Meeting Minutes: 7.17.24
Mr. Creech moved that the Planning Board approve the draft Minutes of the meeting held on 07.17.24
as presented. Ms. Thompson seconded the motion. The Planning Board voted in favor of the motion 4-
0-1 (Roll call: Creech – yes; Peters – yes; Schanbacher – yes; Thompson – abstained; Hornig – yes).
MOTION PASSED
Upcoming Meetings: 8/14, 8/28, 9/11, 9/25, 10/9
Ms. McCabe reminded the Board about the upcoming meetings on August 14th, and August 28th and went
over the agenda items briefly.
Adjournment
Mr. Creech moved that the Planning Board adjourn the meeting of July 31, 2024. Ms. Thompson
seconded the motion. The Planning Board voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0 (Roll call: Creech – yes;
Peters – yes; Schanbacher – yes; Thompson – yes; Hornig – yes). MOTION PASSED
Meeting adjourned at 9.20 p.m. Lex Media recorded the meeting.
Material from the meeting can be found in the Planning Board’s Novus Packet.
List of Documents
1. 329 & 331 Concord Ave: Peer Review Memo dated 07-25-2024; RHSO Memo dated 07.25.24; Staff
memo dated 7.25.2024; full link to application material -
https://lexingtonma.portal.opengov.com/records/91785. Architectural Plan set, average natural
grade worksheet forms, drainage report dated June 17, 2024, LEED Checklist, Response to DRT
comments, Neighborhood meeting notes, preliminary construction management plan, project
narrative, preliminary signage, zoning summary, design checklist, SWPPP dated June 17, 2024,
Inclusionary Dwelling Unit Locations.
List of Public Comments:
a. Electronic Mails from Keith Whitmore from April 29 through May 16, to Planning Staff,
Subject: discussion with Cannizzo on 331/329 Concord Avenue
Lexington Planning Board Meeting Minutes
July 31, 2024
Page 10 of 11
b. Electronic Mail from Adeline Chan to the Planning Board, Subject: 331 Concord Ave, dated
June 17, 2024
c. Electronic Mail from Margo Reder to Planning Director, Subject: Proposed development
at 329-331 Concord Avenue, dated June 25,2024
d. Electronic Mail from Margo Reder to Members of the Planning Board, Subject: Proposed
development at 329-331 Concord Avenue, dated June 26,2024
e. Electronic Mail from Margo Reder to Planning Director, Subject: Proposed development
at 329-331 Concord Avenue, dated June 28,2024, along with two pictures of Follen Street
and Dawes Avenue
f. Electronic Mail from Kunal Botla, Chair Transportation Advisory Committee to Planning
Director and Planning Board Chair, Subject: 331 Concord Avenue Comments,
Transportation Advisory Committee, dated July 11 ,2024
g. Electronic Mail from Tom Shiple on behalf of Lexington Bicycle Advisory Committee, to
Planning Director, Subject: LBAC feedback on 89 Bedford and 331 Concord, dated July 22,
2024
h. Electronic Mail from Jason Ye, to members of the Lexington Planning Board, Subject:
Concerns Regarding Proposed Development at 329/331 Concord Ave, dated July 22, 2024
i. Electronic Mail from Herb Kline Subject: Cannizzo property 329/331 Concord Ave, dated
July 24, 2024
j. Electronic Mail from Ruth, to Planning Board, Subject: Virtual Planning Board Meeting
7/31/2024 re.329 / 331 Concord Ave. proposal dated July 24, 2024
k. Electronic Mail from Margo Reder to the Planning Board, Subject: 329-331 Concord
Avenue, dated July 24, 2024
l. Electronic Mail from Karl Stocki, Subject: Concord Avenue, dated July 25, 2024
m. Electronic Mail from Thomas Lam to Board Members, Subject: Concerns and Request for
clarification on Traffic Study Exemption for Proposed development at 329/331 Concord
Avenue, dated July 24, 2024
n. Electronic Mail from Steve Heinrich to Members of the Planning Board and Planning Staff,
Subject: Letter regarding the Proposed Development at 329-331 Concord Avenue, dated
July 25, 2024
o. Electronic Mail from Jeffrey Cheng to Planning office, Subject: 329-331 Concord Avenue,
dated July 26, 2024
p. Electronic Mail from Christina Cheng to Planning Board Members, Subject: 329-331
Concord Avenue Resident Comment, dated July 25, 2024
q. Electronic Mail from Feng Yin to Lexington Planning Board, Subject: 329-331 Concord
Avenue Lexington concerns from a local resident, dated July 25, 2024
r. Electronic Mail from Rena Maliszewski to Lexington Planning Board and Quinlan
Locke/Cabot Cabot & Forbes (CCF), Subject: 329-331 Concord Ave proposal dated July
23, 2024
s. Electronic Mail from Judith Clausen to Lexington Planning Board, Subject: 321/331 Mixed
Use/ Concord Ave/ July 31,2024 Meeting, dated July 23, 2024
Lexington Planning Board Meeting Minutes
July 31, 2024
Page 11 of 11
t. Electronic Mail from Peixin Zhu to Town Planning Board, Subject: Concerns about the
proposed 329-331 Concord Avenue Multi- Family site plan, dated June 30, 2024
2. 85 Pleasant St: Staff memo dated 07.23.24, staff memo dated 05.30.24, Request for leave to
withdraw without prejudice dated 07.30.24. Definitive Subdivision plan set, Project Narrative, Draft
covenant, Description of project, Stormwater Management Report and Calculations for a Definitive
Subdivision, Hearing continuance form dated January 25,2024, from Trina Murphy for 85 Pleasant
LLC, Planning Director Memorandum to Trina Murphy/85 Pleasant LLC dated May 30, 2024, Assistant
Planning Director Memorandum to Planning Board and copy to Trina Murphy of 85 Pleasant LLC,
dated July 23, 2024, Staff memo from
3. List of public comments:
u. Electronic Mail from Laurel Carpenter to Lexington Planning Board and Staff, Subject: 85
Pleasant St, abutter comments, dated July 25, 2024
v. Electronic Mail from Nicolas Valenzuela to Lexington Planning Board, Subject: Comments
on Definitive Subdivision Plan for 85 Pleasant Street, dated July 22, 2024
w. Electronic Mail from Patricio Alexander Whitney to Lexington Planning Board, Subject:
Definitive Subdivision Plan 85 Pleasant Street- Town of Lexington Planning Board Hearing,
dated July 24, 2024
4. 32 Brookside Ave: Plan Expansion Stormwater Management Report Dated 06.19.24, Stormwater
summary dated 07.25.24, staff memo dated 06.21.24, additional staff comments dated 06.25.24,
picture taken on 07.30.24
List of public comments:
x. Electronic Mail from Barbara Rommelfanger to Lexington Planning Board, Subject: 32
Brookside, dated July 30, 2024
y. Electronic Message from Bill Cates to Lexington Planning office, dated July 31, 2024
z. Electronic Mail from Christine King, Subject: Opposition to proposal to pave Stedman
Road, dated July 31, 2024
aa. Electronic Mail from Hanna Gaggin to Lexington Planning Board, Subject: Plans for the
Stedman foot path to Farmcrest Ave dated July 31, 2024
bb. Electronic Message from Kristen Stelljes, dated July 31, 2024
cc. Electronic Message from Lester Blumberg and Robin Hasenfeld to Planning Board, dated
July 31, 2024
dd. Electronic Mail from Tongyao Wang to Planning Board, Subject: Objection to the proposal
to pave Stedman Road, dated July 31, 2024
5. 25 Hartwell Ave: Town Clerk stamped decision of Planning Board, covenant dated 02.26.24
6. 40 Hartwell Ave: Covenant dated 02.26.24