HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-26-04.pdf DRAFT MINUTES of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals-August 26, 2004
Present, Mrs Uhrig, Chair, Mr Smith, Vice-Chair, Mr Barnert, Mrs Sheehan, Mr McWeeney
Petition Address. 20 Cottage Street
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading notice at 7 45 PM and described information received
from the Petitioner and other Boards and Commissions There were 2 letter received in favor to the
Petition
The Petition was presented by—Martin Rommel, Owner
Information presented by Petitioner- Application- drawings
The relief sought Variance to allow construction of a front entry and back deck within the required
setbacks
The hardship is—Relief from sand entering house from unpaved street
Questions from the Board.
Mr Smith Is a vanance needed for side yard set back to construct deck? (Martin Cert Plot plan
incorrect, changes to remove deck from plot plan had been made, there is a note on the plan) No
construction of deck within side setbacks
John. Where do you park cars? Very small area for parking
(Martin plans to park in same area Neighbors are in process of talking about ways to correct parking
problems on street)
Questions from the audience. None
Speakers in favor Davis Shepard, 75 Woburn Street, abutter, spoke in favor of petition
Speakers in opposition. None
Hearing was closed at 7 55 pm
Discussion. None
Decision On a Motion by Mr Barnert, seconded by Mr Smith The Board by vote of 5-0
Approved the petition
Submitted by Dianne Cornaro, Clerk
DRAFT MINUTES of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals—August 26, 2004
Present, Mrs Uhrig, Chair, Mr Smith, Vice-Chair, Mr Barnert, Mrs Sheehan, Mr McWeeney
Petition Address 9 Bushnell Drive
The Chairman opened the hearing at 7 56 PM by reading the notice and a letter written by 16 Loring Rd
in opposition No other comments from boards or committees
Mrs. Uhrig stated that she felt they were not going to make a decision at this meeting because of so
much new information that had just been presented to them this evening She did want to hear
discussion from the petitioner and the audience She stated they have 2 options to withdraw without
prejudice or to continue to September 23r1
The Petition was presented by Atty Al Schrader His position is that he a right of way that allows this
access and doesn't need the driveway permit
Information presented by Petitioner-Atty. Schrader described the History of the property and presented
exhibits (Exhibit A, B, Plan D) and described the plot plans as the land had been sold and reconfigured
over the years Also discussed the Town of Lexington taking of Waltham Street access over a right of
way to Waltham Street
The relief sought is—Special permit to allow access for a lot over another lot and not from the lot's
frontage
The hardship is—not applicable.
Questions from the Board
The board had many questions regarding easements, drawings and the plans They were confused as to
where a future house was to be built
Mr Smith Dnveway confusion, need explanation
Mrs Sheehan Are you claiming by town taking portion easement off Waltham Street you need a
special permit? No, opposite Town found that existing driveway from Bushnell was acceptable at that
time. Is it in writing? Atty. Schrader spoke with Town Counsel regarding binding agreement. (Mrs.
Uhng read from 40A, special permit for dnveways over other lots )
Mrs Uhng asked them to get letter from Town Counsel giving his advise as to whether this is a legal
binding agreement that gives them the right to use driveway and to have a clearer, sufficient and
complete submission next time
Questions from the audience — Discussion never went any further than the petitioner before application
was withdrawn without prejudice.
Speakers in Favor —The owners and their daughter
Speakers in Opposition—There were many in the audience opposed to the petition but did not speak as
petition was withdrawn
Rebuttal by Petitioner—After a lengthy discussion, the petitioner withdrew their application for a
special permit without prejudice. Atty. Schrader hand wrote the withdrawal on their behalf.
Hearing was closed at 8 45 PM
Decision. On a Motion by Mr Barnert seconded by Mrs Sheehan, the Board by a vote of 5-0 voted to
accept withdrawal of the application without prejudice
Submitted by Dianne Cornaro, Clerk
DRAFT MINUTES of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals- August 26, 2004
Present, Mrs Uhng, Chair, Mr Smith, Vice-Chair, Mr Barnert, Mrs Sheehan, Mr McWeeney
Petition Address—27 Colony Road
The Chairman opened the hearing at 8.45 PM by reading the notice and descnbed information received
from the Petitioner, other Boards and Commissions and letters relative to the Petition.
The Petition was presented by—Marcia Sneden, Owner
Information presented by Petitioner- Presented pictures and detailed hardship of topography and location
of building on lot Letters in favor
The relief sought is to allow construction of a front entry within the required front yard setback
The hardship is—Topography of Land, steep slopes and location of dwelling on lot Front door is
northwest facing wind Would like to airlock entry with an enclosed entry to stop cold air and debris
from entering directly into house in winter
Questions from the Board—Only comment from board was Judi couldn't find a street number on house
Asked that owner please make sure one is put on for safety
Questions from the audience. —none
Speakers in Favor—None
Speakers in Opposition-None
Rebuttal or comments by Petitioner -none
Hearing was closed at 8 50 pm
Discussion. none
Decision On a Motion by John McWeeney, seconded by Mrs Sheehan The Board by vote of 5-0
Approved the petition
Submitted by Dianne Cornaro, Clerk
DRAFT MINUTES of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals- August 26, 2004
Present, Mrs. Uhrig, Chair, Mr. Smith, Vice-Chair, Mr. Barnert, Mrs. Sheehan, Mr. McWeeney
Petition Address—20 Estabrook Road
The Chairman opened the hearing at 8•.50 PM by reading a letter from the petitioner requesting
withdrawal without prejudice
Decision. On a Motion by Mr. Barnet Barnert, seconded by Mr. Smith. The Board by vote of 5-0 to
accept the withdrawal without prejudice
Submitted by Dianne Cornaro, Clerk
DRAFT MINUTES of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals- August 26, 2004
Present, Mrs. Uhrig, Chair, Mr. Smith, Vice-Chair, Mr. Barnert, Mrs. Sheehan, Mr. McWeeney
Petition Address— 1010 Waltham Street (Brookhaven)
The Chairman opened the hearing at 8•.55 PM by reading the notice and described information received
from the Petitioner, other Boards and Commissions and letters relative to the Petition
The Petition was presented by Atty Bill Dailey, Former Brookhaven Trustee
Information presented by Petitioner-Aerial view of area was set-up Mr Dailey gave a bnef overview
of Brook-side and the significant changes in the demographics of the elder population They are
proposing to increase the number of units and revamp the Wellness Center They are to meeting with
the Conservation Committee Tuesday, August 31' and are working with the City of Waltham to put in
sidewalks with a traffic light on Waltham Street Mr Dailey addressed traffic concerns by saying they
never reached 50% of the projected amount of traffic expected from the original project Some of the
residents do have cars but use them very infrequently They voluntarily sent a copy of the Landscaping
Plan to the Tree Commission and are willing to work cooperatively with them on their concerns.
Although a not for profit, they expect to give the town $325,000 a year in lieu of taxes
The relief sought is special permit with site plan review to allow expansion of a Planned Residential
Development (RD District)pursuant to town meeting approval at 2004 annual town meeting,
Questions/Comments from the Board
Mrs Uhrig raised concern of report from Tree Commission on their recommendations for the type of
trees and walls on plan.
Mrs Uhng read for public the reasons for denial of special permits with site plan review This project
cannot be overturned because it was passed by Town Meeting It is the Board of Appeals job to make
sure things gets done correctly in accordance with town meeting vote
Mrs Uhrig• Is Brookhaven willing to have their agreed upon $1,000 contribution for Transportation
Coordinator in writing? (Yes)
Mr Smith No report from Engmeermg7 Wants confirmation from Engineering that reports given are
okay
Karen Mullins said that the Conservation Commission has hired an independent Civil Engineer to look
at the plans since the Town Engineering Department is short staffed and is unable to review findings
Mr Smith Can a decision be made without Engineer's report or on condition that the Engineering
report is accepted by Conservation Mr Smith felt that Engmeenng should report to the Board of
Appeals because the BOA would be looking at the plans details on different aspects than Conservation
Mr Dailey said they would have no objection to that and would rather the board be comfortable with all
decisions
Mrs Sheehan asked about timeline Karen said that she is hoping that she would have Engineers report
within a couple weeks and that she would contact the Engineers and change the contract to include
review for Board of Appeals
Mr Barnet.. Will you lose parking spaces during construction? The formal construction plan is being
designed They are planning on doing construction in phases so parking will be moved around as the
work is completed
Mr Barnet. What will be the hours for construction (Brookside said they are governed by the residents
and they will be respectful of that.)
Mrs Sheehan Do they have Medicaid residence? Do they count towards 40B?
Private pay for Assisted Living but they do have Medicaid for Nursing facility
Nyles Would you be willing to have written that they would not ask for any further expansion plans?
No plans for any more expansions they have no more room but also cannot predict long-term future
Questions from the audience
Lorraine Centrolla, 16 Bow Street, Waltham wanted to know why she had not been notified of this and
past hearings regarding this petition, she is across the pond from Brookhaven. She was advised that her
property is beyond 300 feet
Speakers in Favor —There were many residents of Brookhaven in the audience but did not speak
Discussion stopped when it was determined the hearing would be continued at a later date
Speakers—Pat Deiesi, 23 Wamsetta Avenue, Waltham Water is a problem, showed aerial map from
2001 showing pond and Bow Street She explained flooding problems Also can't understand having a
crosswalk in a very dangerous intersection, thinks crosswalk should be discouraged.
Rebuttal or comments by Petitioner -Many residence still very active and like to be able to walk They
are working very closely with Waltham to make crosswalk and signals safe for them
Discussion
Decision On a Motion by Mr Barnet, seconded by Mr Smith The Board by vote of 5-0 to continue
hearings until Thursday, September 23rd at 8.30.
Submitted by Dianne Cornaro, Clerk
DRAFT MINUTES of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals- August 26, 2004
Present, Mrs. Uhrig, Chair, Mr. Smith, Vice-Chair, Mr. Barnert, Mrs. Sheehan, Mr. McWeeney
Petition Address—67 Fottler Avenue
The Chairman opened the hearing at 8.51 PM by reading a letter requesting an extension
Questions from the Board -None
Questions from the audience. - None
Speakers in Favor -None
Speakers in Opposition-None
Rebuttal or comments by Petitioner -None
Discussion. None
Decision On a Motion by Mr Barnert, seconded by Mrs Sheehan The Board by vote of 5-0
to approve extension of vanance for one year from date of this meeting
Submitted by Dianne Cornaro
Upcoming
Mrs Uhng discussed upcoming 40B petition and is asking that all associates be present at Heanngs
concerning this petition Mrs Sheehan will be excusing herself from this petition Lynne Wilson will be
sitting in for her
Mrs. Uhng will be on vacation from September Pt thru the 8th.
The meeting adjourned at 9 55 PM