HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-02-26-HATS-min
HANSCOM AREA TOWNS COMMITTEE
NOTES OF MEETING
Held at 7:30 PM on February 26, 2009
At Lincoln Town Offices
PRESENT:
Jeanne Krieger Lexington Board of Selectmen (Chair)
Sara Mattes Lincoln Board of Selectmen
Robert Domnitz Lincoln Planning Board
Lisa Mustapich Bedford Planning Board
Richard Canale Lexington Planning Board
Wendy Manz Lexington Planning Board
Margaret Coppe Lexington HATS
Dorothy Steele Massport/ OGCA
Sara Arnold Massport Hanscom
Col. David Orr Hanscom Air Force Mission Commander
J.C. Corcoran Hanscom Air Force Base, Community Relations
Lou Sideris Minuteman National Historic Park
Ken Bassett Lincoln
7:30 PM INTRODUCTION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
The Chairman welcomed attendees, especially Colonel Orr who has agreed to give
an update on military base activities.
th
There will be a meeting of MAGIC on Thursday March 12 in Lincoln to discuss
transportation issues, including the TIP and stimulus funding.
Richard Canale reported that a contract has been drawn up for the Battle Road
Scenic Byway management study. The team will be led by Christine Wallace and Mark
Racicot of MAPC staff. The working group will also include members from each town
and the National Park Service. Towns are asked to designate two representatives, of
which one should preferably be a selectman at least initially, and one is likely to be a
Planning Board member. Two meetings are being planned, in April and May, prior to a
public kick-off meeting in June to discuss goals and parameters. Although town staff will
need to assist by providing information from existing sources, it is intended that any new
work will be done by MAPC.
7:35 PM UPDATE ON BASE ACTIVITIES
Colonel Orr, Hanscom Air Force Mission Commander thanked the HATS
communities for their cooperative attitude towards his efforts to improve the base in his
first six months as Commander. He provided an update on the housing situation, which
he has met with the towns’ selectmen to discuss. The background was the military’s
desire to improve the standard of its housing, and privatization was embarked on as part
of this effort. The first contractor, American Eagle, failed and construction stopped with
only a small number of homes completed. The new contractor, Hunt, Pinnacle and Falcon
Properties, has taken on housing projects at several military bases. At Hanscom the
1
project is for 747 homes, of which 265 are larger new units and the balance are
renovations. The few that have already been completed will be ready for occupation
shortly, and by September 2011 it is hoped to have all the units occupied with military
families. Colonel Orr felt that there were benefits to military families from living on the
base and also that the families strengthen the local area by supporting businesses etc.
Referring to the “waterfall” mechanism for identifying occupants if there is not enough
demand from the active military, he stressed that the list of eligible groups begins with
military-related ones. He noted that if some homes end up being occupied by the general
public, this will raise issues such as security and access. He hopes to avoid this situation.
The reason for this possibility being included now is to achieve a viable contract. The
contractor will own the homes and needs to obtain financing. An occupancy level of less
than 95% triggers the next level on the list. Sara Mattes welcomed Colonel Orr’s
willingness to communicate candidly about the situation.
The Commander also mentioned that a bid for economic stimulus funding to rebuild
the school serving the base is being made. The school is operated under contract by
Lincoln. Other stimulus projects put forward are to renew base infrastructure. A
dormitory proposal did not go forward.
In general terms, Col. Orr said that he aims to keep the base operating well and to
keep it open. In a climate where base reductions are still being sought, it is important to
avoid local conflicts. He welcomed the fact that the Hanscom area towns have expressed
support for the base. He noted that business development proposals may raise some
issues for the adjoining towns. An “enhanced use lease” idea is being developed to
address a projected move of research operations to other bases. The addition of the
National Guard function may strengthen the base. The towns could help to raise the
profile of command and control activities. Col. Orr pointed out that Hanscom is now the
only active duty military base for a seven state area and he felt it had an important role in
supporting training units and other related organizations.
Ms. Mattes suggested that it may be possible to revive the “build the base”
campaign as an ongoing organization to support military activities in Massachusetts. The
HATS Committee would welcome further regular updates.
In terms of local community connections, Col. Orr mentioned that there will be Girl
Scout cookie distribution event this weekend. The Committee offered to publicize future
community events. The Commander mentioned that a good cause which the local
community may be prepared to support is the shipping of care packages to active service
personnel, which has to be paid for privately. Funds which can channel donations to this
cause are “Operation Warmheart” and “Friends of Hanscom Families” (contact via Jim
Corcoran’s office, 781- 377-6851).
8:00 PM WORKSHOP: PROPOSED CHANGES IN STATE ZONING CODE
Copies of a fact sheet on the proposed Land Use Partnership Act and a summary of
th
its effects on municipalities, based on the December 8 draft, were distributed. These
were prepared for a scheduled discussion by MAPC, which was deferred as
transportation issues took precedence. Richard Canale reported that a chart comparing
LUPA with the earlier CPA II was also prepared by MAPC.
Mr. Canale explained that a zoning reform task force led by APA planners and
interested parties has been filing bills for many years but received little attention. In the
2
last two years the Governor’s task force has examined the issues and filed LUPA.
Communities need to look at both bills and consider what they would support. LUPA
may be more likely to get legislative attention, and may also evolve in the process. The
Governor is known to be interested in economic development and the streamlining
approach. The task force is led by Greg Bialecki of the Housing and Economic
Development Department. The planning community considers LUPA to be developer-
oriented.
It was reported that MAGIC held a discussion on LUPA in the fall and that the
communities’ reaction was negative, especially to expedited permitting. One comment
was that some of the things that are offered as ‘incentives’ to municipalities should apply
anyway.
Mr. Canale explained that LUPA is structured in two parts: one that would apply to
all areas and one that has to be earned and opted into by municipalities. The group looked
at the summary but considered that it would need more of an explanation from first
principles. Planning members observed that LUPA reduces appeal rights and could sweep
away a large body of case law leaving a vacuum; that it sets formal and difficult
procedures for levying impact fees, for example for traffic mitigation, whereas it would
be helpful to have the authority for such fees confirmed; that it offers some improvements
to problematic zoning and subdivision laws but that they are mostly of minor significance
in areas that are largely built out; and that details of final wording will be important.
It was agreed that the Planning Board representatives would compile a summary of
concerns in the form of a statement that HATS, MAGIC and legislative representatives
could be asked to support. Other HATS members will endeavor to learn more about the
issues. Mr. Canale mentioned that the town of Dennis has done an analysis from a town’s
point of view.
9:00 PM ROUTE 128 CENTRAL CORRIDOR COALITION
Sara Mattes reported that the Coalition met the previous Friday. She offered thanks
to Barbara Lucas for setting up the meetings that led to the group’s establishment. The
meeting discussed the Supplementary Program Draft Environmental Impact Report for
the development of the Polaroid site, which states that it should not do anything to
impede the development of a multi-modal interchange.
Local congressmen are interested in upgrading the Fitchburg line. A dedicated
bus/HOV lane could link to it and it is hoped that a regional mitigation bank and a
corridor plan could be developed. However, the state is currently not interested in
cooperating on a plan unless it incorporates zoning changes and housing development.
9:05 PM HANSCOM FIELD ADVISORY COMMISSION
Jeanne Krieger reported that the recent meeting received a report on operations
which indicated reduced activity. Studies of taxiway repaving were discussed. In
connection with vegetation management, Massport reported that it is working with
Lexington on the designation of wetlands and trees. Massport reported on a package of
economic stimulus measures to be managed by the FAA, which is separate from the state
government’s list.
Mr. Domnitz commented on a recent noise study for further development at
Hanscom, which came close to a previously used baseline. Massport responded that the
3
ESPR looks at further studies and goes into more detail, and that there was no
commitment to adhere to the one measure.
9:20 PM ECONOMIC STIMULUS PROJECTS
Mr. Canale reported that there is currently an unreviewed and a reviewed list of
projects for the state. It is hard to discern a logical pattern at this stage.
OTHER BUSINESS:
TRANSPORTATION FINANCE PROPOSALS
Mr. Canale reported on a Power Point presentation given at the MAPC Council
meeting on the state’s ideas for reforming and renewing the transportation system. The
Move Massachusetts website (www.youmovemassachusetts.org) has long lists of
proposals. They include abolition of MAC and changes to Massport’s role including
buying Worcester Airport (of which it recently took over operation), selling the Tobin
Bridge to the road authority, and providing additional funding for transit operations
serving Logan Airport. There are differences in proposals from the Senate and the
Governor at this point. The Senate wishes to address organizational issues before
considering increased revenue, while the Governor favors a gas tax increase. Various
bills propose a range of gas tax levels. The MAPC Council supported a high level. The
bills are being analyzed and a summary will be available shortly.
NEXT MEETING
th
The next meeting will be on Thursday March 26 at 7:30 PM. The discussion topic
will be regional cooperation as well as further discussion of planning and transportation.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 PM.
Submitted by Catherine Perry
Accepted as amended, as notes of meeting, March 26, 2009
(insufficient quorum for formal minutes)
4