Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-07-19-HSC-min.pdf Note: Members of the Human Services Committee are urged to attend the presentation of the Needs Asssessment to the Board of Selectmen on Monday, July 31 between 7:30 p.m. and 8 p.m. Also, please note item 4 in Minutes pertaining to the Committee's schedule for August. Human Services Committee Minutes July 19 1995 Present: Donna M. Hooper, Co-Chair; Rosalyn L. Gittleman; Julie E. Fenn; Eva S. Glick; Jeanne R. Luongo; Richard Safford; Jolley Anne Weinstock, Co-Chair; Steve Baran, Human Services Coordinator; Barry Orenstein, Suzanne Larsen, RePlace 1. Minutes, 6/7/95 and 6/29/95 The Minutes were approved. 2. RFP approach It was noted that while services were specified, no particular mix was requested. Each proposer was given the latitude of coming up with a different approach. 3. Proposal evaluation Rick Safford commented that when proposals were reviewed there would have to be some weighting of what was more or less important to the programs being proposed. The Committee voted 7 to 1 to accept additional help for the purpose of evaluating the proposals. This was being done to avoid any inadvertent bias or perception of bias. It was agreed to include for this purpose Leona Martin (Fair Housing and Human Relations Committee, Lexington Housing Authority) and Marilyn Goldman (Executive Director, Temple Emunah and formerly their Youth Director). It was further agreed that a third person be sought, e.g., from School Department, Police Department, Comptroller's office, or a youth representative. Steve Baran was asked to inquire if a representative from the School Department or the Police Department might pose conflict of interest problems and what would be the procedure for obtaining approval to involve these persons. 4. Schedule of forthcoming events 8/02: No regularly scheduled meeting 7/31. Needs assessment presentation to the Board of Selectmen 8/09• Members to have initially read and ranked proposals 8/15 8/17- Final review 5. Needs assessment There was further discussion of a final draft of the needs assessment with unanimous agreement on a final ranking of problem areas.