HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-04-24-HSC-min.pdf Minutes Human Services Committee 4/24/89
l Present From Human Services Committee Bob Cushman,
Co-Chairman; Dick Dougherty; Seymour Mandel ;
Harvey Lowell ; Sheila Martin; Ann Irving;
from School Department Paul Lombard,
Administrator, Pupil Services - Special
Needs ; Rachel Rosenblum, Social Worker, Core
Evaluation Team; Debra Packard, "Project
Mainstream" ; from LABS Program Robert
Renna, Director ; from Lexington Citizens with
Special Needs Marion Shepp and Martha
Zeigler ; Bill Blout, RePlace ; and Steve
Baran, Human Services Coordinator
1 The Minutes of the meeting of 4/24 were accepted
2 Steve reported that he was investigating needs items
for the Committee while the Town' s department heads
concerned with health and human services were looking
into child care needs among Town employees A pre-
bidding conference was being undertaken to investigate
vendors for the Senior Health Monitor Program The
need for a liaison to the Enablement Committee from the
Human Services Committee was mentioned Rick Safford
was acting as liaison between the Lexington Committee
with Special Needs and the Enablement Committee
C1 3 On the subject of special needs recreation
Paul Lombard provided statistics (see attached) on
special needs children by age and Chapter 766 prototype
as well as a narrative on the subject of special
education (dated 1 /6/89) He said there was a need for
programs for children between the ages of 3 to 15 The
Collaborative was looking after the recreational needs
of those children between the ages of 15 and 22
Although special needs recreational programs have
existed in other towns for many years, programs in
Lexington date back only 3 or 4 years The LABS
program has initiated special needs activities while
the Lexington Recreation Department has not seen this
as an issue 90% of special needs kids in Lexington
are eligible and must participate
Lexington could have a good Special Olympics program
like Belmont and Arlington Special Olympics were
begun last year in Lexington with poor attendance
Many Lexington kids participate in Special Olympics in
(� other towns
Minutes, Human Services Committee, 4/24/89 Page 2
n
Rachel Rosenblum stressed the importance of special
needs students participating in the mainstream The
bulk of special needs children are capable of
participating in the mainstream Adolescent special
needs kids might wish to form social subgroups of their
own, but this was the exception and normal for
adolescents to do The emphasis should be on access to
existing programs with funding needed to support
integration This would permit more individual
attention to be given Staffing is also needed to
provide consultation on what special needs is all
about
As for young adults, there were no other facilities
The lack of social clubs forced young people of this
age to look outside of Lexington for recreation
Debra Packard noted that there are many special needs
kids who are not considered as such In some cases,
parents of special needs kids have created special
programs for kids who could be in the mainstream
Segregation has the effect of creating programs which
only meet the needs of the most severely disabled
Hayden has been receptive when offered staff to assist
special needs kids to take advantage of programs or to
provide consultation to Hayden staff (e g , getting
kids out of braces )
Bob Renna also stressed the need for services for
younger students as well as for young adults leaving
the school system The young adults tend to be
isolated with their needs unmet by the Recreation
Department which has allocated only $4, 000 for the 15
to 22 year old group ( to be raised to $6, 000) Special
needs young adults often end up living in other
communities due to the lack of housing in Lexington
Howard Cohen at Boston University is conducting a
comparative study of school age children and special needs
young adults in the towns of Concord, Belmont, Woburn,
Arlington, Lexington and Burlington to determine what towns
are doing around special programming and mainstreaming Bob
plans to present the findings of the study to the Recreation
Department
Bob referred to a long relationship between the LABS
program and Hayden Recreation Center The new
( Executive Director has been more receptive on
Minutes, Human Services Committee, 4/24/89 Page 3
programming, but Bob said he really wanted an
integrated program
As for the Little League, the 1989 rule book still
prohibits special needs kids from participating
Anyone with a disability is forbidden to participate
A number of special needs kids, however, do get into
the Little League because the coaches are inititally
unaware of their special needs
Transportation is yet another need In other towns
much more money is spent for both personnel and
transportation
Bob felt that all kids needed a choice with some
preferring to be in separate programs for social
purposes while being integrated in sports programs
He, too, commented on the few kids in Special Olympics;
only nine this year
Finally, Bob pointed out that 504 regulations
stipulated that all persons with disabilities had a
right to reasonable accomodation He noted that many
1 of the students were versed in the law and knew what
their rights were
Harvey Lowell commented as a parent of a special needs
son that the only sports program available to his son
was karate The ages of the children in this program
ranged from 5 to 15 (not age-appropriate) , and there
were 12 to 13 in the class This was an example of the
lack of options within Lexington for special needs
children The collaborative program in which the
Recreation Department participated was really forcing
kids to go outside of Lexington
Marion Shepp and Martha Zeigler stressed the importance
of programs for the 22+ group There was a need for a
social club in Lexington Harvey advised an
affiliation of the Special Needs Housing Committee with
the Human Services Committee
Seymour asked what financial resources were available
for special needs programs including user fees, parent
contributions, service organizations such as the
Shriners, large corporations, volunteer involvement for
( the over 22 group and respite money from the Mass
Minutes, Human Services Committee, 4/24/89 Page 4
Department of Mental Retardation Seymour felt that
it was most important before approaching any potential
funding sources that there be a public
mandate
Possible next steps
review forthcoming special needs survey;
discuss with Recreation Department;
discuss with Hayden Recreation
4 Dick Dougherty reported on his meeting with Bill Blout
to discuss questions raised by Steve Baran in his
memorandum concerning an additional appropriation for
RePlace to conduct a counseling program in the high
school Dick saw the possibility of reordering
allocations with RePlace to create greater flexibility
for services provided He recommended, in view of one
social worker and one guidance counselor being cut,
that the guidance counselor position be reinstated and
the responsibility in the future carried by RePlace
with funding half from the RePlace budget and half
supplemented by the Town
As to the question of elimination of the drop-in
center, the possibility was envisaged of moving that
program into the schools and consolidating it with the
peer counseling program The peer counselors would run
the drop in-center
Estimating the impact of earlier intervention by virtue
of having a school -based counseling program more
accessible to students would be hard to do
Numbers of interviews would be broken out separately in
future statistics
There was a deficit, and it was not expected that
fundraising efforts would cover the deficit or that
RePlace could, through its fundraising, contribute to
the expense of a program in the school Actually,
RePlace' s costs would be increased by such a program
A contribution from the Public Trust was not seen as
feasible In any event, the time required to
investigate such a possibility would be lengthy
( Dick mentioned further that 40% of the RePlace staffing
Minutes, Human Services Committee, 4/24/89 Page 5
n
would have to be replaced shortly due to personnel
leaving Next year' s budget would require a cut in
FTEs' with the outreach counselor allocation being
reduced to 0 5 FTEs' thereby affecting outreach both in
the school and in the community The present outreach
worker has been full time at $ 18, 000
Dick noted that Lee Feeney was asking the Human
Services Committee to recommend to Town Meeting that
there be an increased appropriation to RePlace while
Bob reported that Renee was opposed out of a concern
that the Committee was reacting to inappropriate
constraints
As to next steps, Dick saw the possibility that the 0 5
FTE outreach position could be paid for out of the
existing appropriation Assignment of an intern to the
school program was also a possibility
Harvey recommended taking no action at this time since
the Committee was not prepared to make a
recommendation, particularly in view of the need for
substance abuse counseling being added to consideration
of the need for social service counseling The
(- ) Committee should study the matter further and more
fully respond to the questions that have been raised
Certainly, it did not seem to make sense to cut
services when there was a real drug problem
Bob said there was a need to make a statement that
between now and September the Committee would need to
ascertain how much money was needed, and this was
agreed to by the Committee
Bill Blout said that RePlace had proposed 2 FTEs' for
the schools and now could afford 0 5 FTEs' If MassCAP
funding were made available, there would then be 1 0
FTEs' in the schools At the same time, it should be
noted that the total complement of RePlace counselors
was 1 5 FTEs' Bill said he spoke for the Board in
stating that RePlace did not wish to give up what it
was already doing in the community outside of the
school system
The Committee agreed to advise Renee of this discussion
in the event that she would wish to present the
Committee' s position on the floor or Town Meeting
5 The Committee expressed its concern about the one-sided
nature of drug planning with its emphasis on a punitive
Minutes, Human Services Committee, 4/24/89 Page 6
approach
Respectfully Submitted,
Stephen Baran,
Human Services Coordinator
` s)