HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-07-18-HSC-min.pdf Minutes Human Services Committee 7/18/88
Present Harvey Lowell , Chairman; Bob Cushman, Co-
Chairman; Renee Cochin; Marion Shepp; Sylvia
Perlman; Leonora Feeney; Seymour Mandel and
Steve Baran, Human Services Coordinator
Minutes
The Minutes of 6/6/88 were approved Sylvia Perlman should have
been shown as present in the Minutes of 6/20 while on page 2 ,
item 5 of the same Minutes, the spelling of the name of the Mass
Department of Mental Health Area Director is Sudders (not
Sutters)
In Case of Absence
Harvey asked that members who were not planning to attend a
meeting should notify the Coordinator or Chairman in advance
Process Issues
Members were invited to talk about either future Human Services
Committee agenda items (with reference to Steve s notes
previously submitted to the Committee) , what should be
prioritized, or concerns about the Committee ' s process The
Committee elected to discuss process issues which are grouped by
heading below
Mandate
There was some question about whether the Committee had moved
beyond what the Selectmen were prepared to endorse or what was
contained in the Charge to the Committee It was felt by certain
members that dating from the needs assessment hearing of June 19
1986 the Selectmen had been in touch with what the Committee was
doing, and evolutionary developments had stayed within the
Committee' s mandate
Planning Process 1
There was concern about the Committee ' s planning process Did
the Human Services Committee relate sufficiently to other boards
and committees as well as staff , in undertaking new projects?
Were "responsible" groups e g , Housing Authority, LexHab,
Housing Advisory Committee for housing or Council on Aging for
the aged, sufficiently consulted when planning involved areas
traditionally in the jurisdiction of such groups? In retrospect,
it was felt that assumptions might have been made , as in the case
of the Council on Aging, that there was communication through
staff when, in fact, this was somewhat lacking In other
instances , the record showed that many efforts were made to
involve another board, with varying degrees of success as in the
case of RePlace
Did the Committee have a reputation for being brash and
bullying" , as one member suggested, in seeking to effect change?
There was the sense that while there was a risk of being
perceived in this manner, any change effort was bound to have a
somewhat unsettling impact initially on those involved It was
necessary for the Committee to have the courage of its
convictions and form value judgments sometimes at the risk of
being liked
Monitoring
After contracts have been issued what part has the Committee
played in monitoring? Has there been a "long view" of what the
agencies have been doing? Will the Human Services Committee be
monitoring the Council on Aging in the future? Should the
Committee restructure itself in terms of ongoing communication
during the year with the boards and staff of agencies holding
contracts with the Town? There was agreement that these matters
required study
Advocacy
Had RePlace been dealt with unfairly? Did not the Committee
have a responsibility to advocate for Replace? Did the Committee
favor Visiting Nurse and Community Health by giving them a second
and third chance to be rescued with Town money at the expense of
Replace? Was it not the responsibility of the Human Services
Committee to attach dollars to needs to the fullest extent of
meeting those needs and then leave it up to the Selectmen and
Town Meeting to allocate and pare budgets as required by
financial constraints of the Town as a whole?
Advocacy, it was argued, was an activity to be carried on not to
advance any particular social agency but as a response to the
needs of client groups through the services that would respond to
those needs It is often not in the interest of such client
groups to assume that there is any one organization that is
comprehensively able to respond to all of their needs In the
case of adult children with special needs for example many
different resources must be brought together in order that there
be an appropriate response At times , the very group that is
mandated to chiefly respond to the needs of a particular
constituency is not prepared by itself to fully respond to that
mandate
RePlace and Visiting Nurse and Community Health, it was remarked,
were dealt with in an unrelated manner as specific cases and for
specific programs In both cases there had been a relenting on
the expectation that increases be related to the percentages
requested by the Town Manage In both cases , the Human Services
Committee had made opportunities avai abe tothe extent tnat
this could be defended to the Selectmen e g , raise last year ' s
RePlace expenditure from $59 , 000 to $70 , 000 over the Town
( - I
Manager ' s objections In each instance it was commented, the
recommendations of the Committee were not related to any ceiling
but were based on the merits of each case
Terms of Office Resignations
Jan, Sylvia and Marion are retiring from the Committee by
September 30 Steve will double check as to agreed upon dates
when different members are to leave office since there is some
question as to whether dates Steve has recorded from the
Selctmen' s office correspond to letters which Committee members
have received
Recruitment
Harvey has recruited Dick Dougherty with extensive budget and
rate setting background to the Committee while Steve has
approached Connie Sprauer who is an attorney and has been a
health care administrator He will check the Town' s talent bank
and inquire of the Selectmen
( Next Meeting
The next meeting of the Committee is scheduled for Monday, August
8 , and there will be a party (include as agenda item) on 9/19
Respectfully Submitted,
Stephen Baran,
Human Services Coordinator