HomeMy WebLinkAboutAffordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs, 2008AFFORDABLE HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
The Lexington Housing Partnership
Building a Diverse, Vibrant Lexington
AND
Lexington Housing Assistance Board
October 2008
Karen Sunnarborg Consulting
AFFORDABLE HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
Page
1
II. Project Summaries 8
Acton 11
Bedford 18
Bourne 22
Brookline 28
Cambridge 32
Chatham
First Time Homebuyer Asst. Program 35
Balfour Lane project 37
Chilmark/Martha's Vineyard
Aff. Housing Mortgage Asst. Program 39
Helm Home Loan 40
Land Lease Program 42
Marshfield 46
Newton 52
Sandwich 56
Sudbury 59
Waltham 62
III. Conclusion 66
Attachment 1 — Summary of Programs 69
Attachment 2 — Similarities and Differences with
Lexington 72
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
AFFORDABLE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
Survey of Existing Programs
I. INTRODUCTION
The Lexington Housing Partnership and LexHAB have long recognized the need to
diversify the town's housing stock, providing a mix of affordable opportunities for those
who are priced out of the existing housing market. LexHAB has in fact made
considerable progress in producing affordable rental housing with 57 new units built to
date, providing housing for 142 persons this year Nevertheless, to make additional
headway in promoting diversity, the Housing Partnership and LexHAB recognize the
need to also provide opportunities for young families, allowing them to make a long -temp
investment in Lexington through homeownership. In fact, the Town has documented this
need through prior planning efforts.
As the 2002 Comprehensive Plan indicates, "Even as Lexington's average household size
has steadily grown smaller, our housing units have continued to grow larger. Young
adults are largely priced out and disproportionately so, too, are most ethnic minorities.
We applaud diversity, but we are losing it along a number of dimensions. One clear
housing goal is to seek to enable at least our own children to live here, and more broadly
to provide housing opportunities for a broad social and economic spectrum. We want to
accommodate not only the classic American husband/wife/kids family but also
individuals living alone, seniors, young adults, those with physical or mental disabilities
and variety of others" The Plan also stated that the Town needs to develop sources of
financing to support affordable housing such as the "development of a program for first-
time homebuyers in conjunction with local banks."
In this context of promoting diversity in the midst of such high housing prices, is the fact
that there are limited opportunities for new development given that almost all of the
housing that the Town will have at build -out already exists. The Comprehensive Plan
indicates that Lexington will have about 12,000 units at build -out, an increase of fewer
than 1,000 units. Consequently the focus on converting the existing housing stock to
affordability and mitigating against teardowns makes immense strategic sense.
Analyzing Lexington's demographic and housing trends, the two organizations identified
the following conditions that suggest the need and desirability for the Town to promote
first-time homeownership opportunities:
• There has been a considerable decline of those 20 to 24 years old, who are
entering the labor force and beginning to form their own families. From 1990 to
2000, this population declined by one-third when compared to the number
expected on a statewide basis. Additionally, the number aged 25 to 34 was less
than half the expected level. These declines are directly related to the fact that
few young adults can afford to live in Lexington and are forced to find more
affordable housing elsewhere.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
• The percentage of those age 20 to 34 decreased from 16.8% of the population in
1990, or 4.875 persons, to 8.6% or 2,622 persons in 2000. In contrast, this age
group comprised 21% of the state's population in 2000. Also, given the
increases in Lexington s housing prices since 2000, it is likely that this segment
of the population has continued to decline.
• The 2006 Housing Strategy shows an affordability gap of $357,000, the
difference between what a household earning the median income of $96,825
could afford, a house priced at about $293,000, and the median priced home of
$650,000. Prices have increased since 2006 and thus the gap has grown.
• The median single-family home price as of July 2008 was $740,000, requiring an
income of more than $200,000, based on conventional lending practices. Most
households in the state could not afford to live in Lexington much less young
adults without considerable financial assets and income or subsidy funds.
• Condominium prices are more affordable but still largely beyond the means of
those earning below median income. For example, the median condominium
price of $402,000, as of July 2008, requires an income of $130,000 assuming
condo fees of about $300 per month and other conventional lending
requirements.
• Many families start out as renters but desire to own a home for reasons related to
pride of ownership, tax advantages, living under more flexible terms (pets, home
decoration, etc.), a greater sense of stability and security, an investment in the
community and the future, etc.
• The FY 2006-2010 Consolidated Flousing Strategy that is required as a condition
of receiving federal HOME Program funding, states that, "of the 49 single-family
homes built in 2004, all hut one were tear downs" The Plan also recommends in
its strategic plan that emphasis must be placed on how the existing housing stock
can be modified to achieve more diversity and affordability The same deed
restriction that controls resale prices could also reduce the loss of small, older
homes that are the targets of teardowns, maintaining these homes as affordable
components of the Town's housing stock in the long-term.
• The Consolidated Housing Strategy also indicates that Lexington's more
moderate -income renters, with incomes somewhat above 80% of area median
and ineligible for public housing or Section 8 rental assistance, had the highest
cost burdens in relationship to housing, meaning that they were spending well
over 30% of their income on housing expenses. There were more of these renters
than available rental units that they would find affordable. These renters would
likely benefit from an affordable homeownership program if requirements
allowed those earning over 80% of arca median income to participate.
• There have been very limited affordable homeownership opportunities produced
to date. The Battle Green condo conversion project will create three (3) units and
the Jefferson Union project will produce one (1) unit of affordable housing
available to qualifying households earning at or below 80% of area median
income, selected through lotteries. The Muzzey School condominiums provide
affordable condos for income eligible households. In the Muzzey case, there are
ongoing concerns regarding the original deed restrictions.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 2
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
Another recent opportunity to promote affordable homeownership was defeated
at the 2007 Town Meeting when the Planning Board's inclusionary zoning bylaw
proposal was voted down. Town Meeting members claimed that they supported
affordable housing but suggested that CPA funding, drawn from the Town as a
whole, would be a better mechanism for creating affordable housing units.
Prior generations have had the advantage of GI loans and other favorable mortgage
lending options with reasonable down payments. Also, in prior ycars the average home
price to average income ratio was much lower than it is today, making homeownership
more accessible. Given current economic conditions, the ability to obtain financing will
likely become only more challenging for today's first-time homebuyers without
subsidized mortgage instruments.
In order to explore the prospects of promoting affordable homeownership in Lexington,
the Housing Partnership commissioned a report from the Community Opportunities
Group, Inc. in August of 2007, to explore the implications of establishing a program that
would use CPA funds to buy -down the price of housing for sale to program -eligible
homebuyers. Concerned by the high per-unit subsidy cost estimate in the report, the
Housing Partnership then developed an alternative proposal as a pilot initiative that
would make use of the state's Soft Second Loan Program for a buyer's primary
financing, and use CPA funds for a subordinate loan. The proposed program was called
the "Lexington Homebuyer Assistance Program" and $470,000 was requested from the
Community Preservation Committee in late 2007 However, the request was withdrawn
after it met with some initial resistance from the CPC and some residents at a December
2007 CPC public hearing, including some opposition to the fundamental concept of using
CPA funds to support homeownership.
Over the last year, the Lexington Housing Partnership and LexHAB became aware of
additional Massachusetts communities that had implemented affordable housing
assistance programs, many of which used CPA funding, and decided it would be useful to
learn more about these initiatives before proceeding further in its advocacy and program
development efforts. Therefore, the Housing Partnership and LexHAB amended its
previous CPA funding request and received funding approval to survey other existing
comparable programs and to define the parameters for an achievable program that suits
Lexington's needs and concerns. Both the Housing Partnership and LcxHAB wantcd to
!cam from the experience of other communities to establish a Statement of Programmatic
Objectives and a Program Summary to meet these Objectives, leaving program details for
another day
Unlike most affordable housing units that are part of specific new developments,
homebuyer assistance programs are typically targeted to existing housing that is for sale
and scattered throughout the community This approach meets a number of positive local
outcomes including:
Promotes smart growth as it focuses on existing housing in already built-up
neighborhoods with infrastructure;
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
• Provides a means to convert current more modestly priced homes or condos to
long-term affordability;
• Does not carry a stigma as subsidized housing as the homes are already integrated
into existing neighborhoods;
• Provides access to homeownership for first-time homebuyers of modest means
including potentially young adults who were raised in the community but priced
out of the existing market;
• Does not involve building ratios of three market units to get one affordable one and
requires no comprehensive permitting; and
• Realizes an increase in its inventory of affordable workforce housing in months not years.
There are a number of key ingredients that all of the programs shared with some notable
variation as summarized in the following:
• Municipal oversight
All of the communities had identified a particular municipal committee or
department to overset the development and implementation of the program that
was accountable to the municipal executive — either the Board of Selectmen or
Mayor
• Professional coordination
All of the communities, with the exception of Acton, had professional staff on
board to administer their programs. Such professional oversight took different
fol ins ranging from the Housing Authority in Chatham (supported by CPA
funds); to CPA -funded professional staff in Bourne, Sudbury, and Marshfield; to
larger housing staffs and funding levels in the cities of Brookline, Cambridge,
Newton and Waltham; and to regional management in the case of Chilmark and
other towns on Martha's Vineyard.
• Hands on implementation
Beth Rust, the Housing Specialist from Sudbury, characterized this type of
program as a "high touch" one indicating that it involves considerable contact
with applicants, The Director of Waltham's Housing Division stated that, "The
program requires more hand -holding and education of prospective buyers than our
other programs, however is rewarding when the right family is matched with the
right property "
Low volume in smaller communities
Without substantial federal subsidies. these homeownership programs tend to be
able to assist only several applicants per year given typically high per unit
subsidies that make such programs low volume efforts.
• Focus on condos
Most of the units produced through these initiatives have been condominiums as
they are typically the most affordable type of dwellings in the private housing
market. The table on page 5 presents median housing values for both single -
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey 0 Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
4
family homes and condos in the communities included in this report, clearly
demonstrating the relative affordability of condominiums. As the Acton contact
person, Nancy Tavernier, noted, condo buy -down programs tend to work better in
hot market situations where the differential between the market price and
affordable purchase price is large enough to interest prospective purchasers in
entering into long-term deed restrictions. What works instead in more depressed
markets is to sell units to housing authorities or other housing organizations that
are interested in providing subsidized rental opportunities.
Some communities have a significantly greater supply of condo units. Census
data does not differentiate condos from other types of homeownership units.
However, in an effort to obtain some indicator of the relative availability of
condos in each community, this report researched the level of condo sales in
comparison to single-family sales and as a proportion of all sales as presented in
the following table.
Community
Acton
Bedford
Bourne
Brookline
Cambridge
Chatham
Chilmark
Marshfield
Newton
Sudbury
Waltham
Lexington
Source: The Warren Group, October 5, 2008 and Karen Sunnarborg Consulting.
Table 1
Condo Sales vs. Single-family, and All Sales
For Surveyed Communities
2007 'tnd as of 8/2008
# Single-family
Sales
2007/as of 8/08
165/124
136/62
187/149
192/112
138/68
171/84
17/10
253/157
665/428
227/133
325/195
385/265
#Condo Sales
2007/as of 8/08
143/79
55/25
72/32
768/507
1,306/761
25/17
0/0
47/39
334/249
14/12
385/196
58/28
# All Sales
2007/as of 8/08
348/238
238/115
328/209
1,024/660
1,656/942
252/136
238/27
345/215
1,130/759
272/165
802/463
^' 468/311
Condo Sales as
a%ofAll
Sales
2007/as of 8/08
41%/33%
23%/22%
22%/15%
75%/77%
79%/81%
10%/12%
0/0
14%/18%
30%/21%
5%/7%
48%/42%
`12%/9%0,._, t C a
As the table demonstrates, the availability of condos varies widely among the
communities that were surveyed. While Chilmark appears not to have any condos
by the data, at least none that have sold as far back as 1988, Sudbury's sale
transactions for condos were only 5% of all sales last year, now up a bit to 7%.
The level of condos sales were quite similar in Chatham and Lexington, ranging
from 9% to 12% with Marshfield a bit higher at 14% last year and 18% as of this
past August. Bedford, Bourne, Acton and Newton all had condos sales within
one-quarter to one-half of all sales. Not surprisingly, Brookline and Cambridge
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
5
had substantial numbers and percentages of condo sales of approximately three-
quarters of all sales despite some of the highest sales prices in the state (see Table
2 on page 9 for median sales information).
In addition to the relatively lower number of condos in Lexington, it should also
be noted that there has been some local resistance from existing condominium
associations about being targeted for possible buy -down efforts. Therefore, the
design and outreach for any new initiative that might involve subsidizing existing
condos will require consideration and sensitivity regarding these concerns.
Moreover, while condo fees for affordable condos can be calculated differently in
new developments (related to a percentage of the particular unit's interest in the
entire project based on purchase prices), fees in existing condo associations are
already established and purchasers may require some subsidy relief to reduce
these fees to affordable levels as the Town of Bedford has done (see page 18 for
program description).
• Governmental funding requirements
About half of the programs surveyed were following state LIP requirements to
insure that units counted towards the Town's 10% affordability goal and could be
included in the Subsidized Housing Inventory As such they had to follow all
state requirements related to affirmative marketing, eligibility, lotteries, Ready
Buyer Lists, standard deed rider, etc. Despite these requirements, programs did
have quite a bit variation, particularly in how properties are purchased and
subsidized. The other programs, typically those operating in cities, relied on
federal funds and needed to follow these specific requirements. Only Cambridge,
which has its own Affordable Housing Fund, was able to establish its own criteria
and was not subject to extemal governmental scrutiny t
Sound housing conditions
Most of the programs focused solely on properties that were in very good
condition to avoid significant additional costs related to home improvements. All
programs required a home inspection to determine the appropriateness of the
property for participation in the program and to establish what specific
improvements might he necessary and what they would cost. It should be noted
that the home inspection is key to approval by DHCD for those communities that
want the properties included in the Subsidized Housing Inventory, and DHCD
wants to see at least ten (10) to 15 years of useful life on all major structural
elements as well as utilities. This is to ensure that the homeowner will not
immediately be strapped with high repair and operating costs.
It should be noted that when units are to be counted as part of the Subsidized Housing Inventory
they are processed as Local Action Units under the state's Local Initiative Program (LIP) through
DHCD, which considers the list good for two years.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
• Lead paint
All programs that involve state or federal program subsidies must comply with
state and federal lead paint regulations that require an inspection and remediation
if children will be moving into the property, for all units with two or more units in
thc case of HOME Program funding. Some of the programs we examined were
administering lead paint abatement programs and had the internal capacity to deal
with this issue prior to occupancy, while others referred buyers or sellers to lead
paint programs operated by other entities. Most put the onus for deleading on the
seller, to be done prior to the closing.
• Deed restrictions
All of the programs involve some type of deed restriction, with the exception of
Waltham, and those that want to have their units counted as part of the Subsidized
Housing Inventory must use the deed rider required under the state's Local
Initiative Program (LIP). The LIP deed rider dictates the following:
o The resale price is based on a prescribed formula indexed to HUD area
median income.
o The property must be sold to another income -eligible homebuyer.
o The seller must notify thc monitoring agent designated to enforce thc deed
rider and follow the procedures in the deed rider. DHCD is now taking
the lead as monitoring agent for all LIP -sponsored units, but
municipalities also have a role in monitoring, ensuring that units remain
occupied as the principal residence of the purchasers and have the right of
first refusal upon resale.
o The participant must live in the home as their principal residence.
o Approval must be obtained from the monitoring agent to refinance a first
mortgage, take out a second mortgage or add an equity line of credit.
Such permission is typically granted only if the terms of the mortgage are
consistent with LIP guidelines and the loan to value ratio of all mortgages
on the property does not exceed 95% of the resale price.
According to the Waltham's Housing Director, the use of deed restrictions for this
type of program has been a major point of discussion in the Metro West HOME
Consortium, of which Lexington is a member.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 7
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
II. PROGRAM SUMMARIES
A summary of the programs described in this report is included in a spreadsheet format as
Attachment 1 and another spreadsheet assessing similarities and differences in the
programs from Lexington is included as Attachment 2. A quick glance at Attachment 1
indicates that there are a handful of programs that have produced significant numbers of
units through their initiatives, all of which are operated by cities or on a regional basis.
Project outcomes vary widely from a program that was introduced in Chilmark that never
attracted any interest as it did not provide sufficient incentives for entering into long-term
deed restrictions, to Waltham with 94 participants to date, operating without deed
restrictions.
This report summarizes 15 programs in 12 communities, all of which involve the infusion
of subsidy funds to cover the affordability gap or the difference between market prices
and affordable purchase prices, to a greater or lesser extent, based on what the program's
target population can afford. This report identifies several programmatic approaches that
are defined as follows:
• Mortgage Assistance Programs
Most of the programs described in this report involve direct payments to
purchasers after they have been determined eligible to participate in the program
and have located a property in which to purchase that meets program
requirements.
Examples: Brookline, Cambridge, Chatham, Chilmark/Martha's Vineyard,
Marshfield, Newlon, and Waltham.
• Buy -down Programs
This report applies this term to describe those programs where units are purchased
and, if necessary, rehabbed by some identified entity or organization and then
subsidized and sold to qualifying first-time homebuyers.
Examples: Bedford, Chatham's Balfour Land project and the Sandwich Home
Ownership Program (SHOP)
• Hybrid
These programs involve a combination of the above approaches, where pre -
approved homebuyers purchase properties that have been identified by the Town,
however, the applicants enter into the Purchase and Sale Agreement with the
seller and are given the subsidy directly at the closing.
Examples: Acton, Bourne and Sudbury
Land Trust
In this case properties are acquired by or conveyed to a land trust, and a ground
lease is executed between the land trust and purchasers of the new housing.
Example: Martha's Vineyard through the Island Housing Trust
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
As there are substantial variations in how properties are purchased and subsidized, there
is also a wide range of market conditions among the communities examined in this
report. The higher the market prices, the larger the affordability gap and correspondingly
the need for higher subsidies to fill the gap as demonstrated in the following table:
Community
Acton
Bedford
Bourne
Brookline
Cambridge
Chatham
Martha's Vineyard
Marshfield
Newton
Sudbury
Waltham
Lexington
Table 2
Market Prices and Subsidy Levels
Median Purchase Median
Price for Single-
family Home as of
July 2008
$494,888
$493,500
$309,000
$1,040,000
$852,500
$560,000
$1 455,000
5386,000
Purchase Price
for Condos as of
July 2008
$252,500
$404,250
$195,000
$451,250
$410,000
$246,500
NA
$215,000
$745,000 $447,000
5577,500 $519,900
$400,000 $29L253
$740,000 $402,000
Maximum Subsidy
Level
$25,000 to 150,000;
typically $60,000
Not set
$20,000/bedroom
Up to $175,000
Up to $130,000
Up to $60,000
Up to $25,000 on top
of subsidized new
units
$45,000 to $75,000
based on # bedrooms
Up to $115,000
Up to $200,000
Up to 562,000
Source: The Warren Group, September 1, 2008 and Karen Sunnarborg Consu ting.
Acton has the ability to spend up to $150,000 per unit in its Condo Buy -down Program,
but has determined that it is too much for any one household and has therefore kept
subsidy levels to about $60,000 per unit (sec program summary on page 11 for details).
Bourne likewise wanted to keep the per unit subsidy low, at no more than $20,000 per
bedroom, but is finding that market conditions have not softened sufficiently to make the
program work for anything other than very small condos and may have to increase their
maximum subsidy amount. Higher market areas such as Brookline, Newton and
Cambridge have made their programs work on subsidies ranging from $115,000 to
$130,000 but once again focus on the more affordable condo stock. Lexington has
already had some feedback on projected subsidy levels through the report it
commissioned by the Community Opportunities Group, Inc. While subsidy amounts that
range from $100,000 to $200,000 may seem extremely high and may be challenging to
sell politically, it should be recognized that subsidy amounts needed for new construction
are typically well above $200,000 per unit.
Related to this gap between thc market and affordable purchase prices, some
communities have chosen to subsidize those earning beyond 80% of area median income,
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 9
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
reaching up to 100% in the case of Cambridge and up to 140% in the case of Martha's
Vineyard. While CPA funds can cover households earning up to 100% of area median
income, these particular programs also have access to funds that are not constrained by
state or federal requirements and consequently have more flexibility in establishing
program parameters.
In regard to individual program summaries, this report includes as much detail as possible
on each program and as a result there is considerable variation in the depth of information
provided. All summaries were reviewed by the identified contact persons in an effort to
insure accuracy
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 10
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
TOWN OF ACTON
Name of Program. Condo Buv-down Program
Type of Program: Hybrid (Homebuyers purchase properties identified by the Town,
however, the applicants enter into the Purchase and Sale Agreement and arc given the
subsidy directly at the closing.)
Contact: Nancy Tavernier, Chairman of the Acton Community Housing Corp. (ACHC),
978-263-9611, ntavernCnitcomeast.net
Funding Commitments: $300,000 in Community Preservation funding has been
approved to date as well as some additional funding from developers of non -40B
projects, a developer of a 40B project in an abutting town, and a local foundation?
ACHC gets administrative funds from CPA and members can be reimbursed for expenses
but is an all -volunteer board. Nevertheless, the Chair of ACHC spends about 15 to 20
hours per week on committee activities.
Current Status: The ACHC3, an organization very similar to LexHAB, has assisted with
the purchase of eight (8) units to date through the program with some units purchased by
eligible homebuyers and others by the Acton Housing Authority for rental to qualifying
low-income tenants. To date, approximately $280,000 in subsidy funds has been spent.
ACHC has found that most of the demand for these units has come from single women
with children. In addition, funds have been used for closing costs and down payment
assistance by five first-time homebuyers who participated in the program or bought other
40B units.
Summary Description. The program is directed to subsidizing the cost of purchasing an
identified condominium in town to enable a qualifying purchaser earning between 60%
and 80% of area median income to become a first-time homeowner The subsidy reduces
the principal amount of the mortgage and is provided to the seller at the time of the
closing. The affordable purchase price is based on the state's Local Initiative Program
(LIP) formula and, factoring in the condo fecs, the maximum purchase price has been
about $110,000, assuming a $300 monthly condo fee. The subsidy amount can range
2 Each year the Town allocates CPA funding to the Community Housing Program Fund, administered by
the ACHC. Funding is requested annually at various levels with several eligible uses such as the Condo
Buy -down Program. Another $500,000 in funding came from negotiations with a developer of a 4013
project that needed access from Acton for housing that was being built in Concord. A local foundation has
also provided about $100,000 in funding towards the Town's affordable housing efforts and a local
developer donated another $400.000 to the Town for affordable housing. The CPA and Foundation funds
are held by ACHC with BOS approval for expenditure.
3 The Acton Community Housing Corp. administers the program. which is the Town board charged with
providing "affordable housing opportunities for working families with modest incomes" and facilitating
local affordable housing initiatives and working with developers on new development. This is a quasi -
public body that was created by a home rule petition in 1996 that grew out of a private non-profit housing
organization created in 1986. The Board of Selectmen appoints all members.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
11
from $25,000 to $150,000, however is targeted by ACHC at about $60,000 per unit for
garden -style units selling at market prices of $150,000 to $175,000.
Initially ACHC contracted with a lottery agent to do the necessary marketing and lottery
to create a Ready Buyers List that met all LIP requirements as part of a pilot effort to test
the program. After extensive outreach, this lottery only attracted 12 applicants at the
program's inception.4 ACHC then worked with a local real estate agent to identify
properties to purchase focusing on the most affordable segment of Acton's housing
market, garden -style condos, and those developments that were not reliant on septic
systems.5 ACHC put two of these condominiums under agreement with contingencies
(e.g., an eligible buyer would be found, unit would be approved by DHCD, property
would meet inspection standards), however, no one on the list was interested in
purchasing this type of unit. The units were then made available on a first-come, first-
served basis with additional outreach, and finally a buyer was found for one of the units
and the seller backed -out of the other. This initial condo was on the market for about
$150,000 and sold for $100,000, requiring a $50,000 subsidy
ACHC found that applicants were not interested in purchasing this type of apartment, but
wanted a door that opened directly to the outside. As one applicant on the list indicated,
"I've lived in an apartment all of my life, why do I want to buy one?" Units that were
more desirable, such as townhouses, were selling for at least $235,000 that would require
a subsidy of about $135,000 While the program has the flexibility to go up to $150,000
in subsidy, the ACHC was reluctant to provide this amount of subsidy to just one
household.
The program has maintained some flexibility to be able to respond to opportunities as
they arise including:
• Twenty new condominiums were being developed that included one (1)
affordable unit as a result of the Town's negotiations with a developer who
requested a sewer connection. The unit will be sold for $150,000 while the
market units were priced at $330,000, beyond what the Town could "buy -down"
for additional affordable units. The Ready Buyer List will be used for this unit.
The ACHC may further subsidize the price to help the buyer meet the
affordability requirements.
• Another opportunity surfaced when a developer who was converting a garden -
style apartment complex to condominiums was required by the Town to create
four (4) affordable units including a one -bedroom unit for the Acton Housing
Authority The developer hired a lottery agent who marketed the units and held a
lottery, but no applicants were found so the units went on a first-come, first-
served basis. Two single -person household buyers were found to purchase two of
the condos, a one -bedroom priced at $115,000 and a two-bedroom priced at
4 This summer ACHC sent letters to all those on their Ready Buyer List and determined that only three
were interested in remaining on the List and in possibly participating in the program.
5 It should be noted that about one-third of Acton's housing stock is comprised of multi -family dwellings,
most of which are apartments that have been converted to condominiums.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 12
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
$130,000. The Housing Authority purchased the remaining two (2) units, one that
had been earmarked for them and a second with ACHC program funds after
ACHC had entered into an agreement to purchase with the seller The Housing
Authority owns and manages both units, renting them to eligible tenants. The
total subsidy amount for these four units was $160,000, averaging $40,000 per
unit.
• ACHC also subsidized three units in a Chapter 40B development. The units were
sold to first-time homebuyers for $150,000 (one -bedroom) and $167,000 (three-
bedroom) and another three-bedroom unit was sold to the Acton Housing
Authority for $270.000. The program subsidy of $76,000 came from foundation
funds.
Eligibility Criteria; All units are expected to be counted as part of the Subsidized
Housing hnventory as LIP Local Action Units, and consequently must meet all state LIP
requirements and be deed restricted. (See Bourne and Marshfield summaries for more
detail on these requirements.)
Application and Selection Process: The ACHC engaged a consultant, Maureen
O'Hagan, to conduct the initial marketing and lottery per LIP requirements. A Ready
Buyers List was created that included 12 qualified applicants. DHCD ruled the List
could stay active for two years due to the sporadic nature of the program. When
everyone on the List indicated that they were not interested in purchasing the units that
ACHC had put under agreement, the organization began to identify prospective
purchasers on a first-come, first-served basis. There are only three (3) persons on the
current Ready Buyer List.
Property Inspection. ACHC hired an independent home inspector to inspect properties
and identify any needed repairs, including those in common spaces. Thus far only one
unit needed a significant repair, the replacement of an electrical box, and the seller and
ACHC split the costs. Lead paint has not been an issue to date, and if lead was found
ACHC would likely back away from the deal or insist that the seller do the delcading
prior to the closing.
Success Factors in Adoption and Implementation. As ACHC was processing
applications, it found that applicants were having a great deal of difficulty affording the
associated closing costs and down payments so they established a program to provide up
to a $10,000 grant to qualifying first-time homebuyers to offset thc purchase a unit. Five
purchasers have participated in the program since it was introduced in 2007, three from
the Condo Buy -down Program.
ACHC has also maintained the flexibility and foresight to respond to opportunities as
they arose such as entering into an agreement on units it sold to the Housing Authority
rather than have the AHA go through a lengthy RFP process.
In regard to success factors in adoption, this type of program, focused on the existing
housing stock, was being heavily promoted by a number of very vocal community leaders
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 13
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
as a preferable alternative to unwanted 40B's. Consequently it was an easier political sell
when time came to approve CPA funding for the initiative.
Issues to Consider/Do Differently: The main problem with Acton's Condo Buy -down
Program was the product itself. The affordable market units are all older less desirable
garden -style units, that are roughly 850 square feet in size with two -bedrooms and sone
limited amenities such as swimming pool but without inside parking or much storage.
Because Acton has so many condo units, there are always more desirable units on the
market such as townhouses but at prices that would require a subsidy greater than
politically practical ($150,000+). In a down market, the gap between the market price
and affordable price is not that great, making it less attractive to a first-time homebuyer,
who not only gives up that eligibility for future 40B new construction units, but also takes
on a deed restricted unit with accompanying red tape and documentation of income,
assets, etc. and a lack of equity building. If there were fewer 40B units available, thc
buyers might have been more interested. There is also strong competition with the
current rental market, as a large Avalon project has attracted this clientele as has lower
rents in general.
Onc revision could be to work with each applicant on the Ready Buyer List and take
them around to units on the market to see if they would select something they considered
desirable and then work with them to come up with a reasonable subsidy New
construction units are definitely on the top of every buyer's list, buying those down
would be a winner for the buyers but not for the longevity of the program as funds would
soon be depleted especially since CPA funding is expected to drop.
ACHC has developed a list of reasons that they believe are contributing to problems with
thc program including:
1 Applicants prefer new construction over existing units
2. Apartment conversion garden -style units are not considered desirable
3 Applicants have poor credit with large credit card debt
4. Mortgage crisis fears
5 No savings for closing and down payment
6. Not ready for the responsibility of homeownership
7 This may be only property can own in the life and they want it to be the right
opportunity
8. Willing to wait for lotteries and take their chances for a newly -constructed unit
9 Negative press on 40B's and affordable housing in general
10. Large 40B rental projects are driving down market rents, making it more
affordable to stay in a rental and opening up luxury affordable units
11 Tax advantages of homeownership are not widely known
12. Households with incomes below $35,000 cannot obtain mortgage financing
13. Households with incomes over $66,500 cannot qualify for affordable unit but
cannot afford the prices of available market units
14 It's just easier to maintain the status quo
15. Wrong time of the year to make a move
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 14
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
16. Job insecurity without prospect for increasing income
17 Program might work for townhouses or duplexes with higher per unit subsidies
18. No washer or dryer in unit which is OK for an apartment but not for a condo
19 Acton schools are less of an attraction since school systems in general are
improving in more affordable communities
20. High taxes
21 Deed restricted unit with inability to grow equity
22. Rcd tape for income, assets, mortgages
23 Reluctance to provide financial documents, in this era of identity theft, even
though information is kept confidential
A SAMPLE GARDEN -STYLE CONDOMINIUM UNIT IN ACTON
2 -Bedrooms, 1 -bath with 842 square feet
Garden -style building
Living room
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
15
Bedroom #1
Bedroom #2
Bathroom
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
16
Kitchen
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 17
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
TOWN OF BEDFORD
Name of Program. Condo Buy -Down Program
Type of Program. Buy -down Program (units purchased and rehabbed by some entity
and then subsidized and sold to qualifying first-time homebuyers)
Contact: Joanna Nickerson, Assistant Town Manager, 781- 275-1111,
ioannanatown.bedford.ma.us
Funding Commitments: $161,200 of CPA funds was approved in October 2001
Current Status: One condominium purchase was processed through the program to date
back in 2002, and while the unit has not been included in the Subsidized Housing
Inventory, the Town is continuing to work with DHCD to count it. Approximately
$145,000 remains in escrow for the purchase of more units and to subsidize the condo
fees.
Summary Description. In September of 1986, John Callahan, a Trustee of
Meadowbrook Realty Associates, and Michael Callahan and William Callahan applied to
the Bedford Planning Board for a special permit to construct a planned residential
development (PRD) on a 10 -acre site known as 45 Shawsheen Road. Built in 1987, the
project involved the development of 36 townhouse -style units for sale as condominiums
as well as the preservation of seven acres of open space. The developer also proposed to
set-aside six of these units as affordable, having this affordability managed through
perpetuity through the Town of Bedford. In fact these six affordable units became the
motivating force for forming the Town's Affordable Housing Committee that shortly
after evolved into the Bcdford Housing Partnership. The affordability of these six units
has been targeted to those earning within 150% of the area's median income.
Unfortunately, at the time of this development the state had no mechanism in place to
allow affordable units, created without state or federal subsidies, to be counted as part of
the 10% standard, Subsequently, the state established the Local Initiative Program (LIP)
that would allow units that are made affordable through internal subsidies to be counted if
they are processed through a comprehensive permit and receive DHCD technical
assistance.
This program involves the Bcdford Housing Trust purchasing market rate or restricted
units (those units set-aside at the Shawsheen Ridge project as affordable) as well as
potentially other condominium units in Bedford, subsidizing the units to affordable
prices, and selling them to qualified families with requisite deed restrictions to protect
long-term affordability and to enable the units to ideally be included in the Town's
Subsidized Housing .Inventory Community Preservation Funds were earmarked in 2001
to fund the gap between market or restricted prices and affordable sales prices.
Another important program component involved subsidizing the monthly condo fee
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
18
The Housing Trust explicitly identified the program's goal of providing affordable
housing opportunities without making significant changes to the built or natural
environment.
When the program was initially conceived, the Housing Trust projected the following
program costs:
Based on the acquisition of six market rate condotniniums the estimated costs are
as follows —
1 bus
1 Acquisition Costs $ 1,650,000 Sales
1 Hard Costs $15,000
Soft Costs $15,000 CP
1 Total $1,680,000 Total
1
5712,680 1
1
$967,320
$1,680,000
Total Development Costs/Unit = $280,000
Total Subsidy/Unit = $161,220 (Community Preservation Funds and other
sources)
Projected sales price = $118,780 (affordable to someone earning approximately
$47,500 annually based on participation in the state's Soft Second Loan Program
and LIP)
Based on the acquisition of six affordable condominiums. such as those at
Shawsheen Ridge, the estimated costs are as follows —
1 Acquisition Costs
1 Hard Costs
Soft Costs
1 Total
$ 840,000
$15,000
$15,000
$870,000
:es
Sales
CP
Total
$712,680
$157,320
5870,000
Total Development Costs/Unit = $145,000
Total Subsidy/Unit = S26,220 (Community Preservation Funds)
Projected sales price = $118,780 (affordable to someone eaming approximately
$47,500 annually based on participation in the state's Soft Second Loan Program
and LIP)
** Ideally, the project will involve primarily the affordable units, resulting in a
considerable savings of Community Preservation Funds. However, some
combination of affordable and market rate units was judged to be likely
Eligibility Criteria: All units were expected to count as part of the Subsidized Housing
Inventory, and meet all state LIP requirements and be deed restricted. However, the first
unit is not yet included, but the Town continues to work with DHCD to have it counted,
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 19
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
Application and Selection Process: The Bedford Housing Trust was responsible for
establishing a marketing/outreach effort to attract eligible purchasers, for managing the
application and pre -approval process for interested purchasers, as well as coordinating a
lottery system to select the new first-time homebuyers. The Housing Trust has hired a
part-time affordable housing consultant who provides professional support on a wide -
range of affordable housing initiatives including these activities when they arise.
Property Inspection. The buyers were required to hire their own home inspector to view
the property and identify any problems.
Success Factors in Adoption and Implementation. The Town of Bedford has been
acknowledged as a community that has really "stepped-up" in regard to the issue of
affordable housing, and in fact, last year received an award from CHAPA in recognition
of the progress that has been made in promoting affordable units. The Town was the first
to pass the Community Preservation Act that provided financial support for local housing
initiatives. The combination of progressive leadership from the Board of Selectmen and
Housing Partnership and Trust as well considerable professional support through its
Assistant Town Manager and Affordable Housing Consultant, has enabled the Town to
increase its level of affordable housing from 4.5% in 2004 to its current level of 18.3%,
remarkable progress in only a few years. CPA funding was available sooner than in most
communities to fund housing activities, there was strong local leadership that identified
the promotion of affordable housing as a priority need and the Housing Partnership/Trust
had the credibility to obtain funding for its work. Another compelling justification for
obtaining funding for the Buy -down Program was the availability of condos that, while
not eligible for inclusion in the Subsidized Housing Inventory, were being sold at below
market prices, thus decreasing the funding gap.
In regard to implementation, the Housing Trust was able to move quickly in acquiring its
first condo in 2002, but ran into obstacles that decreased interest in eagerly pursuing
additional purchases. The major obstacle to acquiring more units is that none of the other
owners of the five remaining owners of the restricted units has expressed any interest in
moving and selling.
Issues to Consider/Do Differently: The Town might consider looking beyond the
Shawsheen Ridge condo development for other condos that become available in town
that might be included in the program.
Comments regarding the program stressed the need for the following considerations in
developing a comparable initiative:
• The age and condition of the condo is a major concern. They were looking for
units without the need for unreasonable repairs or cleaning.
• Whether the condo association is likely to require a special assessment in the near
future that would provide additional and potentially unaffordable cost burdens on
the purchaser.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
20
• Need for full disclosure to prospective purchasers on condo ownership that goes
beyond the general first-time buyer workshops. They provided copies of the
condo association documents at the open house and other supportive information.
• Clear information to prospective purchasers and sellers on the length of time
needed for fair marketing, the lottery and even resale required by affordablc
housing requirements.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
21
TOWN OF BOURNE
Name of Program. Bourne Housing Opportunity Purchase Program -- BHOPP
Type of Program. Hybrid (Homebuyers purchase properties identified by the Town,
however, the applicants enter into the Purchase and Sale Agreement and are given the
subsidy directly at the closing.)
Contact: Kerry Horman, Bourne Affordable Housing Specialist, 508-457-1005,
b ou rn ehousinenartn ershin(aih otmail.com
Funding Commitments: The Bourne Housing Partnership received $298,000 in CPA
funding over two years to start the program and anticipates additional funding next year
to continue operations.
Current Status: The Program was recently launched and is in the process of working
with those on its Ready Buyers List to obtain financing and is also searching for suitably
priced properties in Bourne to direct its prospective homebuyers. From a total of 13
applicants, seven (7) were determined to be likely eligible and participated in the lottery
The program is currently working simultaneously with about five applicants. The
Housing Partnership is also resolving some issues that have arisen during implementation
including the following:
• DHCD expressed concerns that if homebuyers obtained financing from the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, which, given very low interest rates and other
advantageous terms and conditions, would allow lower income purchasers to
access more expensive homes, it might be difficult to resell the units to qualifying
purchasers with financing from conventional sources, assuming the U.S.D.A. no
longer had some advantageous mortgages available. Consequently, the program
had to establish maximum purchase prices based on the existing LIP formula.
• The program wanted each potential property to be inspected prior to including it
in the program, and wanted to make sure that it used inspectors that had the
appropriate credentials. Questions were raised as to how to deal with existing
lead paint and how to pay for necessary repairs to bring any homes up to HUD's
Housing Quality Standards. It was the intention of B-HOPP to only approve units
that needed little or no repair work, the costs of which could be covered by the
available subsidy
• While the program established maximum subsidy levels of $15,000 per bedroom
for single-family homes and $20,000 per bedroom for condominiums
(acknowledging that the inclusion of condo fees in mortgage underwriting reduces
the amount a purchaser can borrow based on existing income), housing values
may not have declined as much as the Housing Partnership expected and because
of the LIP loan limits the program may be adjusted by increasing the maximum
subsidy for single-family homes to $20,000 per bedroom.
• As with other comparable programs, B-HOPP involves considerable assistance to
program participants, and as opposed to working with the top ranking applicant
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
22
1
first and then incrementally working its way down the Ready Buyers List, the
Housing Partnership, through its Affordable Housing Specialist, is working
simultaneously with all five (5) current applicants on the List, directing them to
the U.S.D.A. and other lenders to obtain a mortgage commitment and searching
for suitably sized and priced properties. This would have not been the case if
there were more eligible applicants as they had planned to go through the list with
particular properties and work with those who were immediately ready to move
ahead.
Summary Description: The Bourne Housing Partnership has created B-HOPP to help
meet local affordable housing needs by identifying an eligible group of buyers (as
defined by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts's Local initiatives Program) that it can
work with over a period of two years to purchase their first homes and when necessary
makes essential repairs. Assistance to eligible applicants will be in the form of a direct
subsidy to reduce the principle of a mortgage in an amount that is the minimum
reasonably necessary under current market conditions, initially planned not to exceed
$15,000 per bedroom for single-family homes and $20,000 per bedroom for
condominiums.
In developing the program, the Partnership worked with the U.S. Department of
Agriculture to identify opportunities for program participants to secure mortgage
financing at very attractive rates and terms° that would enable lower income purchasers
to finance more expensive units than available under more conventional terms and
conditions. The Partnership was also committed to coordinating funding sources for
down payment purposes and mortgages from the state and other sources in cooperation
with local lenders and through other public subsidy programs. The intent of the Housing
Partnership was to combine existing programs with B-HOPP in such a way as to help as
many applicants as possible.
The other major program component was matching purchasers from a pre -approved
Ready Buyers List to identified properties on an Approved Properties List, with the
Flousing Partnership taking the lead in locating more affordably priced homes and condos
in the existing housing market and referring prospective buyers to specific units based on
size and price.
Eligibility Criteria: Eligible applicants must meet a number of requircuients to be
eligible for participation in B-HOPP including having gross combined household
incomes at or below 80% of arca median income and have combined assets of no more
than $75,000 per state requirements under DHCD's Local Initiative Program (LIP). It is
the intention of the Housing Partnership that all units purchased under this program be
eligible for inclusion in the Subsidized Housing Inventory and count towards the Town's
10% affordable housing goal.
Besides income and asset limits, other B-HOPP requirements include the following:
6 These funds are only available to designated rural counties, not Middlesex County
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
23
• A prerequisite of purchase will be the completion of a homeowner training
program acceptable to the Bourne Housing Partnership.
• All applicants will be required to apply for mortgage pre -approval from both a
conventional lender and the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Rural Home Loan
Partnership Program or other available mortgage programs. The Housing
Partnership had reached out to a number of local lenders and included a list at the
end of the application package, although applicants were not specifically required
to work solely with those on the list. Applicants were encouraged to discuss the
availability of the Soft Second Loan Program and other advantageous mortgage
programs directed to first-time homebuyers.
• Applicants had to demonstrate the ability to secure a combination of mortgage
and down payment funds equal to at least $130,000. This requirement does not
guarantee that the applicant will be able to access a property through the program,
however, the Housing Partnership determined that without such financial
capacity, even with the variety of subsidies and mortgage programs available,
properties would not be found in reasonable repair that applicants without this
financial ability could afford based upon the level of subsidy available.
• All purchasers must execute the Massachusetts Local Initiative Program Deed
Rider The Deed Rider was included in the application package. It should be
noted that the program was able to get the U.S. Department of Agriculture's
approval for using the deed rider in concert with its mortgage financing — not a
simple task.
• The total sale price and combined subsidies and renovations were not to exceed
100% of the "as rehabilitated" appraised value of the property with the exception
of when it is determined necessary and eligible by the approved lender and public
agencies involved for approved closing costs and professional review expenses
(such as a home inspection and cost estimation services) to be included.
To participate in the lottery, applicants must provide mortgage pre -approval for
not less than $130,000 (this may include the applicant's down payment), and
mortgage financing must meet all of the following requirements based on LIP
guidelines:
• The loan must have a fixed interest rate through the full term of a 30 -year
mortgage.
• The loan must have a current fair market interest rate of not more than two
(2) percentage points above the current MassHousing Rate. MassHousing
posts this rate on its website.
• The buyer must provide a down payment of at least 3%, 1.5% of which
must come from the buyer's own funds.
• The loan can have no more than two (2) points.
• The buyer may not pay more than 38% of their monthly income for the
mortgage.
In addition to identifying eligible purchasers, the program was also designed to locate
specific eligible properties in the private housing market for purchase, creating an
Approved Property List. It was expected that this List would continue to grow as
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
24
properties were identified that were likely to be affordable to qualifying households given
available subsidy levels from the Partnership. It was also recognized that there might be
occasions where an eligible household might be next in turn yet the available property
that meets their household size needs on the Approved Property List is beyond their
financial range. In such cases that property would be offered to the next household of
appropriate size that can meet the financial requirements to purchase the property The
Partnership will also consider properties identified by eligible applicants if it is clear that
funds will be available when their turn arrives, that the property is within their financial
means, and that available properties on the approved list do not meet their needs by type
or size. All properties must mect DHCD minimum square footage requirements.
Application and Selection Process: Following an extensive affirmative marketing and
outreach effort to notify potential purchasers of the availability of the program.
applications with complete information packages were made available during a 60 -day
marketing period beginning on February 29, 2008 at the public library, Bourne Housing
Authority, Town Hall, the Planning Department and at the Bourne Memorial Community
Building as well as online. Applications were due on April 30`h and in March the Housing
Partnership held four (4) information sessions at various times and locations to explain
the program and answer questions.
The lottery was held on May 14, 2008 to determine the order in which eligible applicants
will be able to receive benefits with preference given to those who meet community
preference criteria. As such, a 70% local preference allowance was utilized to rank
applicants from two separate lottery pools — the community preference pool for those
who meet the Town's criteria as having a connection to Bourne' and a combined pool for
all eligible applicants. Through the lottery applicants were ranked according to the
following sequence: 2 from the local preference pool, next one from the combined pool, 2
more from the local pool, one from the combined pool, 2 more from the local pool, one
from the combined pool, next 3 from the local, 2 combined, 1 local, and then a repeat of
the sequence. This standing and ranked group of eligible homebuyers is called the Ready
Buyers List. and the program was developed to assist them in order of priority until all
were assisted, funding no longer available or until 24 months had passcd from the initial
lottery
State LIP requirements also require a preliminary Lottery if the percentage of
minority applicants in the local preference pool is less than 6.6%, the level of
minorities in Barnstable County per the 2000 census. In compliance with this
requirement, the Housing Partnership moved a minority applicant who lived in
Wareham into the community preference pool.
Moreover, the Program allows applicants who do not meet the application
deadline but are found to be eligible to be placed on a waiting list and be assisted
Community preference criteria for Boume includes current residents, past Bourne residents, those
currently working in the Town of Bourne, and immediate family (grandparents, parents, children or
siblings) of those who currently live in Bourne.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 25
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
after all those who have applied on time and found eligible are assisted.
Property Inspection. The Housing Partnership will engage an appropriately licensed
home inspector to inspect the properties and identify any deficiencies that must be
corrected to insure that the units will ultimately meet the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development's Housing Quality Standards as well as those required by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture for their home purchase mortgage program. The report
will include not only a list of deficiencies but also cost estimates for the necessary
improvements. No additional subsidies beyond thc program limits will he made available
for these repairs, although purchasers will be encouraged to seek financial and technical
assistance through existing rehab programs.
Success Factors in Adoption and Implementation. The ability of the Housing
Partnership to secure CPA funding and initiate the program is primarily due to the
following factors:
• As mentioned in the introduction. these programs that are directed to converting
existing housing in the private housing market to long-term affordability tend to
be very popular politically Moreover, because the housing market in Bourne
tends to be more affordable on a whole, with median housing values at $309,000
and $195,000 for single-family homes and condominiums, respectively (as
opposed to $740,000 and $402,000 for Lexington), the subsidy levels per unit
were likely considered more reasonable.
• The Housing Partnership has established substantial credibility in Bourne over
the past few years. It has completed a number of special projects including the
development of three affordable homes on scattered Town -owned lots in existing
neighborhoods and the rehab of a tax -foreclosed property into affordable housing.
The Housing Partnership has been a vocal advocate for affordable housing,
supporting a number of progressive zoning changes, and certain developments
that include affordable housing. They are the first municipal entity that meets
with developers who are proposing new housing development and have provided
important feedback to both thc developers and the Town. Through its Affordable
Housing Specialist, the Housing Partnership has established an organizational
framework for all affordable units in town, including the various terms of the deed
restrictions and a process for annually recertifying affordability It has also
recently received approval from Town Meeting to establish a Municipal
Affordable Housing Trust that will provide the Town of Bourne with greater
powers with respect to producing affordable housing.
• The Housing Partnership hired an effective Affordable Housing Specialist who
has taken the lead in designing the program as well as coordinating program
development with other entities such as DHCD, lenders and the U.S. Dept. of
Agriculture. His commitment to getting the program up and running and making
it work was an essential ingredient to making the program happen as it has taken
considerably more time than what the various volunteer members of the Housing
Partnership could have committed.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
26
• The Housing Partnership issued an RFP to bring on a housing consultant (mc) on
board to help them implement the program, providing the necessary capacity
building to develop a Ready Buyers List in conformance with state requirements,
facilitate the information sessions, and continue as a technical resource during
program implementation.
Issues to Consider/Do Differently: The Housing Partnership has already adjusted
several program requirements including increasing the subsidy per unit for single-family
homes to $20,000 per bedroom and may in fact be forced to increase levels again if
market conditions do not decline further. In fact, despite decreasing housing values, the
housing market has not likely softened to the point the Housing Partnership had
predicted, and to date only small condominiums have been identified that might qualify
for purchase under existing subsidy levels.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
27
TOWN OF BROOKLINE
Name of Program. Homebuver Assistance Program
Type of Program. Mortgage Assistance Program (direct financial assistance to qualifying
purchasers who locate their own unit)
Contact: Francine Price, Housing Development Manager, Housing Division of
Brookline's Department of Planning and Community Development, 617-264-6482,
Fran Prices town.brookline.ma.us and Bruce Genest, Housing Project Planner, 617-730-
2092, brute genestna town.brookline.ma.us
Funding Commitments: The program is federally funded through the HOME and
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)8 Programs, and is in some ways a "filler
program" according to the Town's Housing Development Manager, as they process
applications on a first-come, first-served basis with up to four (4) loans permitted this
year involving an estimated $400,000 to $700,000 in HOME and CDBG funds. This
funding level was projected only because there is not a substantial development project
on the horizon that would encumber funds and reduce the available funding. It is
otherwise difficult for the Town to use HOME and CDBG because the Town receives
relatively little from each program each year and is under pressure to spend it quickly
The program was introduced in 1993, and funding assistance has been adjusted over the
years in response to market conditions as follows:
• Began at $25,000 in 1993, at which time Brookline's median priced condo was
selling for $141,138,
• Raised to $50,000 in 1998, when the median priced condo was $200,000;
• Raised again to $75,000 in 2001, at which time the median priced condo was
$330,000; and
• Raised to $125,000 in 2004, when the median priced condo was $429,000.
Maximum subsidy amounts were increased again just recently as noted below under the
program description.
Current Status: A total of 61 buyers have participated in the program to date. The
program has been required to provide no more than four (4) loans this year without prior
approval to go higher. While it has always been challenging for income eligible buyers
to identify sufficiently affordable units on the market to make the program work, the
increasing difficulty in identifying affordable market rate units may explain why the most
recent successful buyers have been purchasers of condo rooms in congregate housing
facilities This is despite considerable program outreach.
s Under CDBG regulations, any CDBG funding used for this purpose must be matched by another source —
HOME funding in the case of Brookline.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 28
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
Summary Description: Brookline's Homebuyer Assistance Program provides the
following maximum loan amounts he type of dwelling unit:
• $100,000 for an SRO/room in a group or congregate setting
• $125,000 for a studio
• $150,000 for a one -bedroom unit
• S175,000 for a unit of two or more bedrooms
These limits were just recently approved from the $125,000 maximum across the board
that had been in effect since 2004 This change was made in recognition that despite the
relative leveling in the median condo price since 2004 ($465,000 in 2005 and down
somewhat to $452,500 during the first five months of 2008), it still requires almost
$9,000 more in income to currently afford a median priced unit. Also, inflation during
this period (15% in the consumer price index for urban consumers in the Northcast)
means that families with eligible incomes are less likely to have discretionary income or
savings than in 2004
Assistance is provided through a 0% interest rate loan with no monthly payments on a
first-come, first-served basis. The loans are secured with a 30 -year second mortgage and
a promissory note, which requires repayment of the loan and in some cases a deed
restriction (for condos in associations with six or more units) that provides the Town with
the right of first refusal when and if the property is resold. The program does not require
any repayment of the loan for at least the first 30 years of occupancy, and refinancing is
not allowed without the Town's permission. The Town provides the minimum subsidy
necessary to make the purchase possible, and refers applicants to other sources of
financing instead or in conjunction with its funding such as the Soft Second Program and
MassIiousing's First Time Homebuyer Program. The amount of the subsidy is based on
the participant's income and savings, the cost of the property, and the amount and terms
of other (first mortgage) financing available.
For single-family homes and condo associations with fewer than six (6) units,
participants must repay the loan upon sale, transfer, and death of the borrower(s) or after
30 years of residency that also includes a share of appreciation in the market value of the
unit. The share is proportional to the Town's investment in the property that is the
amount of the subsidy in relation to the owner's cash plus amount of principal paid. The
appreciation is the increase in the property's market value, excluding up to 5% for a
brokerage fee, an appraisal if necessary, and the documented costs of capital
improvements made to the property up to a total of 1% of the initial sales prices for each
full year of ownership. The borrower's obligation will be written as a 30 -year
promissory note, secured by a second mortgage and subordinate to the private first
mortgage. The second mortgage will be extended only if necessary based upon the
documented hardship of the borrower.
For condo associations with six (6) or more units, the Town's subsidy requires a deed
restriction, which not only limits the resale price but also gives the Town the right of first
refusal upon resale. The formula for the resale price is based on the original sales prices,
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
29
minus the Town subsidy, increased by the percentage of increase in the median income of
families in the Boston metropolitan area since the original purchase. The seller may also
recoup up to 1% of the original sales price per full year(s) of ownership for documented
costs of capital improvements. If the Town chooses not to exercise its right to purchase,
the seller can then sell the unit on the open market and share the appreciation with the
Town in accordance with the formula described for single-family homes or condos in
small associations above.
Upon the death of the purchaser, the property may continue to be occupied by the
applicant's spouse or minor children with a guardian. The property may also be
transferred to an adult heir with the Town's approval if the heir meets the program's
eligibility criteria and is willing to execute and comply with all of the program's terms
and conditions.
Eligibility Criteria: Participants must meet federal requirements associated with the use _
of the HOME and CDBG Programs. Specific eligibility criteria include:
• Gross combined total household income must be no greater than 80% of area
median income adjusted by household size.
• Federal guidelines do not provide asset limits, but require that 1% of actual assets
or actual income from assets be included in the gross income calculations.
• Participants must have sufficient income to pay housing expenses (mortgage debt
service generally not exceeding 33% of their gross household income as well as
property taxes, insurance, watcr and sewer fees, and condo fees).
• Neither the purchase price nor the appraised value of the property can exceed
$460,000
+ No more than two persons should be required to share a bedroom and at a
maximum, spouses/partners are expected to share a bedroom as are children of the
same gender. Couples qualify for one -bedroom units only
• The Town's subsidy may not be used to purchase a property with an existing
tenant who would be displaced involuntarily If the unit to be purchased is
occupied by a renter, a notice of intent to vacate, signed by the tenant and dated
prior to the initial negotiations between the buyer and seller, must be provided to
the Town.
• The property must meet all HUD Housing Quality Standards and federal and state
lead paint regulations as well.
• The condo association, if applicable, must have sufficient resources to carry out
operations and have sufficient replacement reserves. If the association involves
ten or more units, the association should preferably be professionally managed.
• The borrower must use the property as its primary residence and may not lease the
property The borrower is also not allowed to convert the property to a
nonresidential use.
Application and Selection Process: Applications are available at the Housing Division's
Office or online, and they are reviewed in the order they are submitted. Following the
initial review, applicants will be notified in writing and through the mail as to their
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 30
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
preliminary status. Incomplete applications are returned without an initial review The
Town's Housing Project Planner then mcets with the initially qualifying applicants and
provides counseling regarding the next steps for purchasing in Brookline. Applicants arc
also encouraged to attend a homebuyer education course.
In order to secure a funding commitment the applicant must submit an executed Purchase
and Sale Agreement and provide or authorize the collection of additional documentation
including the verification of all income, assets and liabilities, and other sources of cash
for purchase, proof of citizenship or legal residency, condo documents (if applicable),
and a copy of the first mortgage commitment letter. The Town's Housing Project
Planner then carries out the following tasks:
• Inspects the unit to insure compliance with all applicable federal and state
standards, including common areas in the case of condos;
• Makes a finding regarding the financial stability of the condo;
• Prepares a financial pro forma reflecting the purchase and monthly costs;
• Works with the applicant's proposed lender on a financing package;
• Prepares a final determination of eligibility and a final commitment letter (the
Town's commitment expires upon the expiration of the P&S Agreement and/or
the first mortgage loan commitment, whichever expires first), including
conditions for closing;
• Prepares all legal documents for the closing; and
a Schedules the closing to occur simultaneously to that of the first mortgage.
Inspection Process: The Town's Housing Project Planner inspects the property,
including all common areas in the case of a condo, to insure that it meets all state and
federal standards, including those related to lead paint. The seller must test all surfaces
with loose, peeling or chipped paint for the presence of lead. if no lead is found, the area
must be scraped, patched and painted. If lead is found, the area must be remediated in
accordance with applicable federal and state regulations by a licensed lead -abatement
contractor prior to move -in. If the seller chooses not to achieve compliance prior to the
sale, proof of the abatement costs and owner funds must be documented prior to the final
loan commitment.
Success Factors in Adoption and Implementation: The program relies on a trained
professional housing staff that is supported by federal funding, providing the professional
expertise necessary for oversight and coordination. The program also relies on a
relatively steady stream of federal funds that are more predictable sources of future
funding versus annual requests for CPA funds by Town Meeting.
Issues to Consider/Do Differently: As noted above, the Town just recently changed its
maximum loan amounts.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 31
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
1 CITY OF CAMBRIDGE
Name of Program: Financial Assistance Program
Type of Program. Mortgage Assistance Program (direct financial assistance to
qualifying purchasers who locate their own unit)
Contact: Antonia Finley, Homebuyer Coordinator, Cambridge Department of
Community Development, 617-349-4643, aravacambrideema.gov
Funding Commitments: Since the program was introduced in 2002, more than S4.6
million in assistance has been provided from Cambridge's Affordable Housing Trust
Fund. The Trust docs not fund the program through regular annual allocations, but
appropriates additional funding on an as -needed basis. For example, last year the
program was recapitalized with $2.6 million. The program does not use any state or
federal funding sources.
Current Status: The program has served 41 purchasers to date. The average purchaser's
income has been 77% of area median income, and the average purchase price has been
$315,000. Only one of the program participants purchased a single-family house, the
remaining 40 purchasing condos in a wide variety of dwelling types from condos in
triple -deckers, to townhouses, to units in large buildings, and to units in larger
developments. Units are subject to a maximum price limit based on the size and type of
the household.
Summary Description: The program grew out of a couple of previous programs that the
City introduced to promote homeownership, using relatively small amounts of subsidy
and directed to middle-income purchasers who were still priced out of Cambridge's
private housing market. The Financial Assistance Program offers need -based financial
assistance to eligible first-time homebuyers to subsidize the price of a home in
Cambridge, providing grants of up to $130,000.
Long-term deed restrictions are required in perpetuity The resale formula is based on a
return on equity that is tied to the 20 -year Treasury rate calculated on an annual basis. So
if a property is sold after five years of ownership, the program would calculate the return
for each of the years and add it up. The other requirement is that the unit continues to be
affordable and is resold to an income -eligible buyer. The deed restriction allows the
reimbursement of certain capital improvements up to 1% of the purchase price per year in
aggregate.
Eligibility Criteria: Purchasers can have incomes up to 100% of area median and must
live in the property as their primary residence. Program participants must be current
Cambridge residents and have resided in the city for at Least one year. They also must be
a first-time homebuyer, access all other available resources including maximizing
mortgage financing, and be otherwise unable to purchase the home without City
assistance.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 32
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
Application and Selection Process: Applicants must submit the following documents as
part of the application process:
• Application form;
• Gross annual household income from all sources of income;
• Copy of most recent tax return;
• Amount of current monthly debt such as car loans, student loans, minimum credit
card payments, etc.);
• A credit report;
• Copy of social security card;
• Amount of savings available for a down payment; and
• Estimated purchase price of Cambridge properties they may be interested in
buying (potential applicants should be familiar with market prices of real estate in
Cambridge).
The program works with applicants in response to inquiries or the submission of actual
applications. Typically staff initially speaks to prospective applicants over the phone to
preliminarily gauge their eligibility and to answer questions. Those who are likely to
qualify are encouraged to apply and then come into the office to further review program
requirements. When the applicants are approved, they must sign a Terms and Conditions
sheet. They are then given an approval letter that includes the maximum amount of
subsidy They can show this letter to the seller when making an offer as well to lenders
when applying for mortgage financing. Applicants come into the program at different
states of readiness, some already with an identified property and pre -approval for
mortgage financing.
Property Inspection: Buyers are responsible for hiring licensed home inspectors and arc
required to submit the inspection report to program staff, which is reviewed by the
office's Construction Manager.
As the subsidy involves no federal money, the program does not have to comply with
federal lead paint requirements. For one -bedroom units or if the applicant does not
involve a household with children under the age of six, the program does not require
dcleading. Otherwise, the seller must delead the unit prior to closing.
Success Factors in Adoption and Implementation: Because the program does not
involve state or federal requirements, the City is able to formulate its own program
requirements, providing substantial flexibility in meeting its programmatic goals based
on local needs. The program not only has considerable funding, but also offers capable
staff support that provides substantial assistance to applicants throughout the application
and purchase processes. Cambridgc also has a diverse housing stock, that while
expensive, allows purchasers to buy units in a wide range of housing types, creating
mixed -income housing throughout the city as a natural outcome of the purchasers' own
housing searches.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 33
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
Issues to Consider/Do Differently: The program has successfully addressed the needs of
small households, even young single adults, but it is difficult for these households to
make the leap to larger more expensive units in Cambridge as their households grow
based on affordability restrictions and maximum incomes of 100% of area median
income. The Financial Assistance Program is limited to first-time homebuyers, so the
program cannot assist these households. It does, however, allow single adults to purchase
two-bedroom units as long as the unit does not exceed the maximum price limit for the
household size and type.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 34
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
TOWN OF CHATHAM
Name of Program. First Time Homebuvers Assistance Proeram
Type of Program: Mortgage Assistance Program (direct financial assistance to
qualifying purchasers who locate their own unit)
Contact: Valerie Foster, Executive Director of the Chatham Housing Authority, 508-
945-0478, chathamhaaa,,vcrizon.net
Funding Commitments: Thus far the program has received $255,000 in Community
Preservation funding from the Town of Chatham through Town Meeting actions in May
2006 and May 2007, of which $15,000 was for administrative purposes to support the
Housing Authority's management functions.
Current Status: The Town has processed one purchaser to date for the full amount of the
subsidy of $60,000, but was unable to count the unit as part of the Subsidized Housing Inventory
because all of the affirmative marketing required under the state's Local Initiative Program had
not been undertaken, including the preparation of a Ready Buyers List. At this time there are six
(6) applicants on this pre -qualified Ready Buyers List.
Summary Description. Chatham's First Time Homebuyers Assistance Program provides CPA
funds to fill the gap between the market price of a home and an affordable one for first-time
homebuyers, making up to $60,000 per household available. The maximum affordable purchase
price is now $180,000, and therefore the maximum markct price is currently $240,000.
Purchasers are encouraged to explore more affordable mortgage financing, such as loans through
the state's Soft Second Loan Program.
Eligibility Criteria: Purchasers must meet all requirements under the state's Local
Initiative Program (many of which are presented under Bourne's program summary
above) as the Town intends to have all additional units purchased under this program
qualify for inclusion in the Subsidized Housing Inventory and count towards the Town s
10% affordable housing goal. Purchasers are required to attend first-time homebuyer
workshops and attend a financial budgeting course prior to closing on their new home,
providing a certificate of completion. All properties must be purchased in the town of
Chatham.
Application and Selection Process: As required by LIP, the program 1 ) affirmatively
advertises the availability of assistance, 2.) holds information sessions, 3 ) determines
eligibility based on a completed application that includes income and asset
documentation as well as a pre -approval letter from a lending institution, 4 ) holds a
lottery, and 5 ) prepares a Ready Buyers List that includes those qualifying applicants.
The Housing Authority provides prospective purchasers with an eligibility letter/Letter of
Compliance that states the terms and conditions of the program and indicates that if they
find a home that meets program requirements they can proceed with an offer to purchase
the home and be eligible for the subsidy provided such funding is still available. They
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
35
provide these letters to all those on the Ready Buyer List and the subsidy is provided on a
first-come, first-served basis.
Since funds are available on a first-come, first-served basis, program outreach and
affirmative marketing will be done on a periodic basis with information sessions held
quarterly throughout the year. In addition to following LIP guidelines with respect to
marketing, the Housing Authority will continue meeting with lenders to discuss the
program and solicit their interest in providing those on the Ready Buyers List with
financing.
Once an applicant from this list is successful in selecting a unit to purchase, additional
documentation is required such as a home inspection report, an appraisal, a signed
Purchase and Sale Agreement and a mortgage commitment. Participants must also enter
into the standard deed restriction required by LIP When the purchaser has the signed
Purchase and Sale Agreement and mortgage commitment in place, the Housing Authority
sends this information, as well as the contact information of the purchascr's closing
attorney, to DHCD, which following review and approval issues the deed rider and
Resale Price Certificate, that must be fully executed at the closing and recorded with the
title at the Registry of Deeds.
Property Inspection: The home inspection is done first, right after the prospective
purchaser has identified a suitable property If there are no short-term major repairs (e.g.,
windows need replacing, roof is in need of replacement or has only about five years or
less on its useful life, heating system is in need of updating to energy efficiency, etc.),
then this house would qualify as meeting the standards required for purchase. Otherwise,
the Housing Authority would insist that the repairs be done by the seller prior to signing a
Purchase and Sales Agreement or it would recommend that the prospective homebuyer
continue looking for another property Lead paint must be removed by the current owner
prior to the P&S — no exceptions.
Success Factors in Adoption and Implementation: The Program was initially the idea of the
Town's Affordable Housing Committee, which approached the Chatham Housing Authority
about submitting a joint application for Community Preservation funding. The Chatham
Housing Authority administers the program. which has substantial expertise in qualifying
applicants for housing program assistance. It should also be recognized that the Town of
Chatham has been quite proactive in supporting local needs for more affordable housing and is
working with the Chatham Housing Authority on a range of other new housing initiatives that
rely on Community Preservation Funds.
Issues 10 Consider/Do Differently: Given changes in LIP guidelines and early program
experience, the Chatham Housing Authority has adapted their program guidelines accordingly
and is now incorporating a rigorous affirmative marketing and buyer pre -qualification process
into the program.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 36
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
Name of Program/Project: Balfour Lane Development
Type of Program: Buy -down Program (units purchased and rehabbed by some entity
and then subsidized and sold to qualifying first-time homebuyers)
Contacts: Elizabeth Bridgewater, Executive Director, Lower Cape Cod CDC, 508-240-7873,
eliz(ci)lowercape.ore and Valerie Foster, Executive Director of the Chatham Housing Authority,
508-945-0478, chathamha(cc4verizon.net
Funding Commitments: Friends of Chatham Affordable Housing (FoCAI-1), a private
affordable housing advocacy organization, raised private funds and secured $135,000 in CPA
funds to acquire the property Funding for the rehabilitation of the property included an
additional $150,000 of Community Preservation funding, substantial private funding raised by
FoCAH, and a grant from Bank of America. FoCAH and the Lower Cape Cod CDC worked
with an abutting property owner to secure a donation of excess sewer capacity, which resulted in
the ability to hook-up to the Town sewer and support the property's change in use from
commercial to residential. The Lower Cape Cod CDC also contributed funding towards the
project by lowering its developer's fee. TD Banknorth was used for construction period
financing.
Current Status: The closing took place on February 29, 2008, and all units were occupied soon
after.
Summary Description: The Lower Cape Cod CDC and the Friends of Chatham Affordable
Housing (FoCAH) redeveloped a large commercial condominium unit on the first floor and
basement of an existing building on Balfour Lane. The building also includes three (3) market -
rate units on the second floor, which were not purchased and remain as market rate housing. The
commercial condominium unit that had served as the offices of the Cape Cod Visiting Nurses
Association. The space was converted into four (4) affordable homeownership condominiums,
all two-bedroom units available to households earning under 80% of area median income with
purchase prices of $154,000.
The Friends of Chatham Affordable Housing (FoCAH), a local organization that raises private
funds and provides advocacy for affordable housing, initially conceived the project. FoCAI-I
identified the property and raised money from the local community and CPA to fund thc cost of
acquisition. Working with FoCAH, the Lower Cape Cod CDC purchased the space in 2006, and
assumed responsibilities for redevelopment.
Eligibility Criteria: For this particular project, the Town wanted all of the units to be reserved
exclusively for qualifying Chatham residents and therefore thc units are currently unlikely to be
included in the Subsidized Housing Inventory Nevertheless, the units are restricted as affordable
in perpetuity, and still fill a compelling local need for affordable housing. Otherwise the units
are still directed to state LIP requirements regarding income, assets and first-time
homeownership.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 37
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
Application and Selection Process: The Chatham Housing Authority was hired to conduct
marketing and buyer qualification. The Chatham Housing Authority held the lottery and
received 24 applications of which six (6) were qualified.
Property Inspection: The Lower Cape Cod CDC managed this redevelopment project, working
with architects, engineers and a selected contractor to convert the existing office space to
residential condos that meet all health and safety codes and HUD Housing Quality Standards.
Success Factors in Adoption and Implementation. This project clearly demonstrates how
effective private fundraising efforts can be in affordable housing development, lead by a local
organization of concerned citizens. It also shows how a partnership of these citizens, local
government, a capable housing authority, and an experienced regional non-profit development
corporation can effectively collaborate, each contributing their own resources and expertise.
The project involved substantial Town support throughout the permitting process, which was
done locally without the use of Chapter 40B. The Board of Selectmen, in their role as Sewer
Commissioners, approved a connection to the Town sewer in spite of a moratorium on sewer
transfers and connections. The Chatham Planning Board approved a special permit for the
change of use from commercial to residential, and the Historic Business District Committee
approved improvements to the structure and grounds. Support resulted from the recognized need
for affordable homeownership opportunities in town, the strong partnership between FoCAH and
the CDC, the use of local donations, and the redevelopment of an existing property within a
designated growth zone. A change in use from commercial to residential was also appropriate
because of the existing market -rate residential units on the second floor.
The Lower Cape Cod CDC worked with the existing market -rate owners to allay concerns about
the new affordable units, and to lay the groundwork for a healthy condominium association. The
existing owners were reassured by the CDC's plans for significant improvements to the shared
grounds and building exterior Existing residents were also interested to learn that their new
neighbors would be purchasing the units at prices fairly comparable (with inflation) to what the
market -rate units had originally sold for when built twenty years ago. The new owners would
therefore not have significantly different incomes than the original occupants.
This project is also an example of Cape Cod appropriate "smart growth." The project reused an
existing building, created density in a designated growth zone, supported residential
development in a mixed-use village center, and incorporated "green" or "sustainable" design
principles in the construction.
Issues to Consider/Do Differently. There may be some opportunities to include a few of the
units in the Subsidized Housing Inventory in the future as units turnover and affirmative
marketing is conducted. The Housing Authority suggests that the lottery agent should be
brought on board as early as possible to insure that the project sponsors, including all those who
are raising funds, are aware of Fair Housing laws and other requirements for insuring that the
units meet relevant state and federal laws and regulations such as being affirmatively marketed
throughout the region and with community preference reserved for no more than 70% of the
affordable units.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 38
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
TOWN OF CHILMARK
Name of Program: Affordable Housing Mortgage Interest Assistance Program,
Contact: Chuck Hodgkinson, 508-645-2114, chodt=kinsonZci.chilmark.ma.us
Type of Program: Mortgage Assistance Program (direct financial assistance to
qualifying purchasers who locate their own unit)
Funding Commitments. $65,000 in CPA funding approved in 2002
Current Status: There were no applicants interested in participating in the program since
funding was approved in 2002. Funding was recently reappropriated to a new, low
interest second mortgage program administered by the Island Affordable Housing Fund
(see description below).
Summary Description: The Program offered mortgage interest subsidies that would
cover one-third of a qualifying purchaser's monthly mortgage interest payment in
exchange for a deed restriction on the property that ran in perpetuity For example, if the
monthly mortgage cost was $2,000, and the interest component was $1,800, the program
would pay the owner $600 per month. The monthly subsidy amount would decline over
time as the interest component of the mortgage payment decreased. The purchasers had
to be determined eligible based on the income requirements and close on a mortgage
prior to receiving any subsidy
Eligibility Criteria: Purchasers had to have incomes at or below 100% of area median
income.
Application and Selection Process: There were no applicants.
Success Factors in Adoption and Implementation: The program was initially successful
in making the case that some CPA assistance would be helpful in promoting more
affordable homeownership.
Issues to Consider/Do Differently: Clearly the amount of the subsidy was an insufficient
incentive for potential purchasers to be willing to enter into permanent deed restrictions.
The Town determined that the funding would be better used in the second mortgage
program administered by the Island Affordable Housing Fund that had matching funds
available (see description below).
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 39
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
1 MARTHA'S VINEYARD
Name of Program. Helm Home Loan (formerly the Helm Foundation Second Mortgage
Program)
Type of Program: Hybrid (participating homebuyers purchase properties that are
identified by the program, however, the applicants enter into the Purchase and Sale
Agreement and are given the subsidy directly at the closing)
Contact: Patrick Manning, Executive Director of the Island Affordable Housing Fund.
508-696-0943 ext. 2, nat(a�islandaffordable.ore and Terri Keech, Administrator and
CFO, Dukes County Regional Housing Authority, 508-693-4419,
t.keechavcrizon.net
Funding Commitments: Has raised $265,000 for the program from a combination of
CPA funding from five communities on Martha's Vincyard and private fundraising.
Current Status: As of November 2007, the program had assisted nine (9) families in
accessing affordable homeownership and between 2006 and 2007 had made more than
$114,000 available through the Program.
Summary Description: The program is administered through the Island Affordable
Housing Fund that raises the funding and provides second mortgage loans to homeowners
who are ground leasing land from the Island Housing Trust (see program description
below on the Land Lease Program). The purpose of the loan is to bridge the gap between
what the homeowner has in savings and the amount that he/she qualifies to borrow The
loan is not to exceed $25,000 with a term of 30 years and at a fixed interest rate of 1%.
The amount borrowed is determined by the lender in conjunction with the Housing
Authority and then reviewed and approved by the Island Affordable Housing Fund.
Participants are required to have a down payment of 5% and at least 3% must come from
their own funds. The remaining 2% can come from a gift, grant, or a private loan not
related to the program.
The )AHF asks all Island towns to participate in the Program through allocating CPA
funds, which the Fund matches dollar for dollar. Consequently, Chilmark's $65,000 has
been committed to the program with the expectation that it will leverage another $65,000
in subsidy funds from the IAHF Funding from a particular town is not restricted to units
located there, however, but directed to projects as they are developed with the clear
expectation that all towns will ultimately benefit.
Eligibility Criteria: The program serves households with incomes of up to 100% of area
median income who are purchasing homes under the Land Lease Program (see
description below). Asset limits are the same as those under the state's Local Initiative
9 The Helm Foundation was the original benefactors for the Program, but recently closed down operations.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 40
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
Program (LIP). The program is need based, and is dependant on the median income
limits that the identified dwelling unit is serving — 80% or 100% of area median income.
Application and Selection Process: The Dukes County Regional Housing Authority
(DCRHA) manages the application and selection process for the program, including the
lottery, to create a Ready Buyers List. They require a pre -approval letter from a lender
that includes the review of credit. Moreover, the program requires applicants to attend a
homebuyer workshop provided by DCRHA prior to submitting an application, and the
course pays particular attention to describing the terms and conditions of the ground lease
to make sure that applicants clearly understand this arrangement.
Property Inspection. The program is piggy -backed onto the Land Lease Program,
described below, that involves the development of new units, rehabilitation of existing
units or mixed-use development, all managed by the Island Housing Fund who supervises
development and owns the land through a ground lease. No separate housing inspections
are therefore necessary
Success Factors in Adoption and Implementation: The program operates regionally
offering some economies of scale in program administration so that each town does not
have to establish separate bureaucracies to manage operations. The program also relies
on the coordinated efforts of three separate agencies or organizations, all of which play a
key role in the program including the Island Affordable Housing Fund, Island Housing
Trust, and Dukes County Regional Housing Authority It appears that each of these
organizations understands its specific responsibilities and there has been good
cooperation. All of these organizations also have to interface with the participating
communities, and most of these towns are contributing to Helm Home Loan.
Another important factor is the ability of the Island Affordable Housing Fund to not only
obtain commitments of CPA funding from the individual communities, but to also raise
significant amounts of private funding for a range of affordable housing initiatives,
including Helm Home Loan and the Land Lease Program. Their annual report includes
an impressive list of contributors who raise approximately $1.3 million annually
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
41
MARTHA'S VINEYARD
Name of Program. Land Lease Proaram
Type of Program. Land Trust
Contact: Phillippe Jordi, Executive Director of the Island Housing Trust, 508-693-1117,
Phillippe.Jordi(aivin evard. net
Funding Commitments: Funding is available from the Island Affordable Housing Fund
to support the Land Lease Program as well as CPA funding from the participating towns
on the Vineyard.
Current Status: Thus far the program has produced 22 units, having just closed on nine
(9) units at Jenney Way in Edgartown. It should be mentioned that at this point Chilmark
wants to control their own housing development efforts, not involving the Island Housing
Trust, but still agrees to use the Trust's basic program parameters. All of the other towns
are working with the Trust.
Summary Description. With funding from the Island Affordable Housing Fund
(IAHF)10, the Island Housing Trust develops and manages land lease projects modeled
after community land trusts that create permanently affordable housing by selling homes
to qualifying homebuyers and leasing the land beneath the homes for a discounted fee
through a long-term renewable ground lease. The ground lease is the legally binding
agreement that gives the lessee or homebuyer the right to use the land and runs for a term
of 99 years and may be renewed by the homebuyer or their heirs for an additional 99 -year
term. The homebuyer owns all of the improvements on the land, including all structures
and fixtures, but the Trust controls the use and sale of these improvements.
The Trust typically develops clusters of single-family houses or duplexes that include a
mix of one, two and three-bedroom units that are sold affordably between $140,000 and
$330,000 to a mix of income earners. The Island Housing Trust usually is able to acquire
property at a discounted price ranging from about $25,000 to $35,000 per unit in
acquisition costs. The Towns on the Vineyard are also beginning to convey property to
the Trust for development. While most of the properties the Trust purchases are
developed for homeownership, the Trust is also working with the Dukes County Regional
Housing Authority on a rental opportunity such that the Trust would acquire the property
1° The Island Affordable Housing Fund (IAHF) raises funding from individuals, businesses, and
foundations to provide loans, grants and technical assistance to organizations working to increase the
supply of year-round affordable housing on Martha's Vineyard. The focus of their efforts has been on the
use of existing structures and, when not possible, small-scale development opportunities as opposed to
larger projects, promoting perpetual affordability through deed restrictions and land trusts. In fiscal year
2006-2007 the organization raised $1,116,964 in private contributions, $172,521 through special events and
about $3,000 in investment income. It provided grants of almost $600,000 and spent about $130,000 on
program expenses.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
42
and develop it and at some point would ideally convey the improvements to the Housing
Authority that would manage the units.
Examples of projects include:
• 150 State Road in Tisbury
This one -acre parcel was purchased by the Island Housing Trust from an existing
estate at a significant discount. The existing property on site was developed into
two condos. Additionally, a property from the organization's House Moves
Program, which moves homes that are planned to be tom down to other sites for
affordable housing, was redeveloped into two affordable condominiums. The
Island Housing Trust received $350,162 in support of this project with another
$150,000 coming from Tisbury's CPA funding and the remainder from the IAHF
The new owners have a long-term, renewable ground lease with the Island
Housing Trust.
• Jenney Way in Edgartown
The IAHF provided the Island Housing Trust with $800,000 for the acquisition of
property and development of nine (9) affordable new homes as a "pocket
neighborhood" in Edgartown Center The project was also the first affordable
housing development to achieve LEED platinum certification (the highest
standard for Leadership in Environmental Design awarded by the U.S. Grecn
Building Council). The project was funded by a generous donation from the
Jenney Family Nominee Trust, an additional private donor and $300,000 from
Edgartown's Community Preservation Fund. Once again, key to this
development was a ground lease that the individual homebuyers enter into with
the Island Housing Trust, which maintains ownership of the land virtually in
perpetuity
• Bradley Square in Oak Bluffs
The Bradley Memorial Church, named for the founder of a small missionary
settlement over a hundred years ago, has been the center of African-American
heritage and culture on Martha's Vineyard. The church unfortunately closed and
has fallen into disrepair. The MT purchased the church and the land surrounding
it to both restore the building and create a multi -use cultural space on the ground
floor with affordable residential units above. The site will also accommodate two
additional buildings that will be built to develop more affordable housing
including some live/work spaces for Island artists. The Island Housing Trust will
develop the properties in conformance with high performance, green building
standards and under a land lease. The IAHF expects to raise $1 7 million for this
project.
Eligibility Criteria: The program provides subsidies to individuals and families earning a
range of income levels, from $30,000 to $90,000 or between 50% and 140% of area
median income, establishing several income tiers in each of the Island Housing Trust's
projects to the greatest extent possible. They focus the CPA funding on those earning at
or below 100% of area median income, work with Habitat for Humanity on homebuyers
canting less than 80% of area median income, and have the flexibility to reach those
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 43
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
earning up to 140% of area median income but still priced out of the Island's staggeringly
high housing market. Typically, at least 25% of the units are directed to those earning at
or below 80% of area median. For example, the 150 State Road project in Tisbury created
four units, one of which was targeted to a household earning at or below 80% of area
median income, another at 100% of area median income, another at 120% area median
and the remaining one up to 140% of area median income. In regards to assets, DCRHA
relies on state LIP requirements. Community preference per project is negotiated with
the town in which the project is located and typically correlated to the level of the Town's
investment in the project up to 70% of the units.
Homebuyers must live in the property for at least 11 months out of each calendar year,
and the unit can only be subleased to income -qualified persons approved by the Trust for
an amount that does not exceed the homebuyer's carrying costs. The buyer pays a
ground lease fee of $50 per month, $600 a year, to the Trust, however this amount does
not come close to covering the Trust's administrative costs but does cover its general
liability insurance policy This lease amount is included in the calculations for
determining the amount of financing the buyer can borrow The purchaser is also
responsible for all property taxes and any condo fees or special assessments, also
incorporated into the mortgage financing calculations. Mortgage financing must come
from a lending institution that meets the Trust's and federal lending criteria, such as
Fannie Mae.
Homeowners are allowed to make improvements to their homes without having to obtain
approval from the Trust, however, resale price limits may result in the investment not
being recovered. They are also able to sell or transfer the home but only back to the
Trust or to an income -qualified purchaser for no more than the maximum resale price as
stipulated in the deed rider. The Trust's resale formula strikes a balance between the goal
of allowing a fair return to the seller (maximum of 4% annual appreciation) and the goal
of limiting the price to a level that will insure continued affordability The formula is the
same for all deals, no matter what the purchaser's income and purchase price. Prices
upon resale will be set at 10% less than the maximum purchase price, for example,
directed to those earning at 70% of area median income for a unit that is targeted to
households earning at or below 80% of area median.
Application and Selection Process: The Dukes County Regional Housing Authority
manages the application and selection process. See Helm Home Loan info above.
Property Inspection. Because the Island Housing Trust is developing all of the units
either through new construction or substantial rehabilitation, all units are brought up to all
relevant health and building codes, including any necessary deleading of units.
Success Factors in Adoption and Implementation. See Helm Home Loan above.
Additionally, community land trusts have been proven models for enforcing use
restrictions for new development. For example, if DHCD is not involved in the
development of the deed rider, the property can only be restricted through deed
restrictions for a period of up to 30 years. That means that properties that are sold to
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
44
those earning more than 80% of area median income and without DHCD involvement,
cannot be controlled for more than 30 ycars unless some other kind of legal basis is
established such as a land trust.
It should be noted that the Island Housing Trust has used Chapter 40B comprehensive
permits for some of its developments and therefore all these requirements must be met.
They were the first community land trust to in fact obtain approval from DHCD on the
use of their ground lease. They are working with MassHousing to get their approval as
well. Most lenders on the Vineyard are now acquainted with the program and interested
in participating.
Issues to Consider/Do Differently: The Island Housing Trust is tweaking the program
all the time, particularly with respect to legal documents adjusting them to various
projects such as to duplexes or mixed-use, for example.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
45
TOWN OF MARSHFIELD
Name of Program. Marshfield Housing Opportunity Purchase Program
Type of Program. Mortgage Assistance Program (direct financial assistance to
qualifying purchasers who locate their own unit)
Contact: Dan Gaulin, Consultant to the Marshfield Housing Partnership, 617-584-5424,
dana,elmwoodhomesIlc.com or Jack Mather, Marshfield Housing Coordinator, 781-
834-1051 marshfld.housine.coordinator anemail.com.
Funding Commitments: The Town of Marshfield approved $225,000 in Community
Preservation funding to initiate the program anticipating that it could make between three
to five awards. A second round of funding of $260,000 was approved last spring.
Current Status: The program received eight applications, two of which were determined
ineligible. Of the remaining six, four were chosen as "winners" through the lottery and
one closed a two-bedroom condo in August using $45,000 of program funds. Two of the
first four chosen applicants ultimately dropped -out as they discovered that they could
purchase without the help of the program and without the need to enter into a deed
restriction. The program coordinator indicated that they anticipated that this might
happen and that such a result was actually a side benefit of the program. One applicant
made an offer that was not accepted and is still looking for another property within the
program limits. Another person (one of the waitlisted applicants who moved up when
two initial winners dropped -out) found a house and has decided to purchase using gift
funds from relatives instead of the program.
Summary Description. The Marshfield Housing Opportunity Purchase Program
(MHOPP) provides subsidies in the form of a grant based on the number of bedrooms
and whether the property is a condominium or a single-family house, similar to the
Bourne program, based on the following grant amounts and price limits:
Size/Type of Unit
1 bedroom condo
2 bedroom condo
2 bedroom house
3 bedroom condo
3 bedroom house
Maximum Sale
Price
$165,000
$196,000
$229,000
$235,000
$262,500
Maximum Subsidy
$45,000
$60,000
$60,000
$75,000
I $75,000
Purchase Price
$120,000
$136,000
$169,000
$160,000
$187,500
Grant winners can use a one -bedroom grant to purchase a two-bedroom house as long as
the unit is within the $165,000 maximum sales price or similarly use a two-bedroom
grant to purchase a three-bedroom unit for no more than the two-bedroom maximum
price.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 46
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
The Marshfield Housing Partnership is the program manager, the entity to which the
Housing Coordinator who is administering the program reports, and the Marshfield
Housing Authority was designated as the lottery agent."
Eligibility Criteria: The program is directed to first-time homebuyers'2 earning at or
below 80% of area median income and meeting all state requirements under the Local
Initiative Program (LIP) so that all units can be counted as part of the Subsidized
Housing Inventory The Town is able to make seven out of every ten grant awards to
those with a specified connection to the community based on its definition of community
preference.13
Program guidelines also state that the subsidy cannot be used to purchase a unit that is
already included in the Subsidized Housing Inventory unless deed restrictions are not in
perpetuity in which case the grant will be the lesser of 35% of the sale price or the
applicable maximum grant included in the table above.
Other criteria include that a non -household member cannot act as a co-signer of the
mortgage and at least one member of the household must have completed a Homebuyer
Education Workshop within the last two years and prior to the closing. South Shore
Housing Development Corporation agreed to conduct a workshop in Marshfield, but the
application materials list other available workshops as well.
Application and Selection Process: Program materials cleverly emphasize that buying a
home under the program is as easy as A -B -C (A -- Apply, B - Be selected, and C -
Commence the housing search). The application process involves completing and
submitting an application that includes a pre -approval letter from a lender. Like other
comparable programs, information sessions and guidelines are available to help potential
applicants determine whether they are eligible for the program in addition to contact
It should be mentioned that the Marshfield Housing Authority had experience in conducting the
necessary outreach and lotteries for other local affordable housing developments, initially hiring a
consultant (me) to help them build this capacity.
12 The LIP definition of a first-time homebuyer is:
1 An individual who is an adult, who has owned a home only with a spouse, who is Iegally
separated from the spouse, and who does not currently own the home previously owned with a
spouse;
2. A household that owned a principal residence not permanently affixed to a permanent foundation
in accordance with applicable regulations;
3. A household that owned a property that was not in compliance with state, local or model building
codes and which cannot be brought into compliance for less than the cost of constructing a
permanent structure; or
4. A household in which at least one member is age 55 or older.
13 Marshfield's community preference criteria include those who have a principal residence in Marshfield,
are parents/step-parents, or child/step-child of someone with their principal residence in Marshfield or are
employees of the Town of Marshfield or of local Marshfield businesses. To conform to recent changes in
state HP requirement, children or parents of a Marshfield resident will no longer be eligible for a
community preference. Also, in compliance with state LIP requirements, local preference is subject to the
addition of non-resident minorities when the proportion of minorities in the local preference pool is less
than the percentage of minorities in the Boston area per the 2000 census (20.7%). Documentation is
required to earn community preference status.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 47
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
information for the Housing Coordinator. Also like most of the other programs, a lottery
was held to establish a Ready Buyers List and winning applicants are further required to
submit updated and detailed income and asset documentation for a final determination of
eligibility They must also complete a homebuyer workshop prior to dosing.
The program sponsored two information sessions to present information on the
application and selection process and answer questions. As is typically the case,
representatives from participating banks were also available to discuss mortgage
financing options and requirements. The program reached out to lenders and included a
list of those that had been briefed on the program and understood what was required with
respect to a pre -approval letter and mortgage financing. Applicants were not required to
solely rely on lenders from this list however. The program specified that the pre -approval
letter be included in the application and that lenders look carefully at an applicant's credit
score and current financial situation and be willing to provide financing within the
constraints of LIP requirements (see Bourne summary for a list of these). The pre -
approval letter must further be from a bank or credit union, not from a mortgage company
or an online letter.
Applications were due on February 29, 2008, and the lottery was held on March 27,
2008, allowing sufficient time for the Housing Authority to review applications to
determine eligibility for the lottery and to get back to all applicants concerning their
status. The lottery included two pools — the community preference or "local" pool and
what they called the "everybody" pool, and the draw occurred with the first two drawn
through the local pool, the third through the "everybody" pool, the next two through the
local pool, the next one through the "everybody" pool, etc. until all those in each pool
had a ranking through the lottery which created the Ready Buyers List. Those in the
community preference/local pool would also receive a ranking in the "everybody" pool,
but it is the top ranking that applies.
As the program anticipated that it only had funding available to make three to five grant
awards, it determined that if four awards were going to be made (working from the top of
the Ready Buyers List), the remaining applicants, in the order of priority in which they
had been drawn, would be alternates. Should any grant winner be unable to find and
close on a home within the time required by the program, the next highest-ranking
alternate from the same pool would be offered the grant. If the returned grant were for a
larger unit than the next highest-ranking alternate qualified for, the grant would be
reduced accordingly If the returned grant were smaller than the next highest-ranking
alternate qualified for, the grant would be offered to the next highest-ranking alternate
who could choose to accept or pass on the grant. If they passed on the grant, they would
still maintain their position in the ranking. If program funds remained available, the
program could use them to augment any returned grants up to the amount that the next
highest-ranking alternate qualified for Any alternate who accepted an award would be
deemed a grant winner and must follow the prescribed post lottery process. If a grant is
returned from a local preference applicant and there are no other local alternates who
wanted the grant, the grant would be offered to the next highest alternate in the
"everybody" pool. Likewise, if an "everybody" grant was returned and there were no
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
48
"everybody" alternates who wanted the grant, the grant would be offered to the next
highest alternate in the local pool.
In addition to replacing grant winners who were unable to complete the purchase of a
home or dropped -out of the program for another reason, the Housing Partnership would
be able to use the list of alternates in the Ready Buyer List if funding could be accessed
through the Town's inclusionary zoning bylaw that permits cash in lieu of actual
affordable unit production. In such case, the Town would choose from the next pool in
the prescribed sequence. If new funding was made available from a source other than the
inclusionary zoning bylaw, the alternate list would not be applicable and a new
application and selection process would have to take place but alternates would be
welcomed to reapply for the new funding.
All grant winners must submit documentation on income and assets per LIP requirements
at the time they are in line for program funding, and grant winners are given 120 days
from the date of the lottery to find and close on a home (subject to permitted extensions),
or in the case of the alternates, from the date they are taken off the alternate list and
deemed a winner Grant winners must also be represented by an attorney to assist them
with the legal work of the closing and to explain the deed restrictions.
Property Inspection. The program requires the following inspections in the following
order to help reduce costs to both the owner and Housing Partnership:
• The Marshfield Housing Authority will inspect the property to determine if it
meets HUD's Housing Quality Standards. This inspection is paid by the Housing
Partnership as part of the program.
• Water quality testing is required for homes on both the public water supply
(testing from an interior faucet to insure that the water meets HUD/FHA
requirements for Coliform, E. coli, lead, nitrates and nitrites) and with private
wells (same as with public water but also must meet local requirements per
Marshfield's Private Drinking Water Well regulations). The cost of these tests
will be paid by the Housing Partnership.
• A Home Inspection Report must be completed by a qualified Massachusetts -
licensed inspector (the buyer chooses the inspector) which addresses all of the
items normally covered in a standard home inspection report14 and includes
inspection for wood boring insects, air testing for radon, hazardous materials such
as asbestos and lead (if the property was constructed prior to 1978), smoke
detectors, and moisture damage. The purchascr is required to pay for this report,
provided that the Housing Partnership approves the property If the Housing
Partnership does not approve the property, it will reimburse the homebuyer for the
cost of the inspection.
• A current Title V inspection if the property if not on Town sewer.
• Any additional testing if the presence of any hazards or hazardous chemicals are
detected or if there are water quality problems. Additional testing will be
14 Per 266 CMR 6:00 Standards of Practice.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
49
reimbursed by the Housing Partnership up to 25% of the cost of the required
testing or a maximum of $1,000, the buyer paying any remaining balances.
The Housing Partnership currently expects that any repairs will be either inconsequential
or be completed by the seller prior to the closing. As such the Partnership will not pay
for or reimburse the homebuyers for any required repairs nor the costs of essential smoke
or carbon monoxide detectors. The Housing Partnership anticipated that most of the
prospective purchasers would be buying condos that are more affordable and in relatively
good shape in Marshfield. Any presence of lead paint was considered to be likely
handled through an existing lead paint program, such as the state's Get the Lead Out
Program, and wrapped into the price of the home. All inspections are required to be
completed within three weeks after the acceptance by the seller of an Offer to Purchase
Real Estate.
Those program participants seeking to purchase a condominium must provide a copy of
the following documents to be obtained by either the seller or condo association:
• Condominium association's declaration, by-laws and regulations
• Condominium association's reserve fund plan
• Disclosure of any judgments against the condo association or any pending
lawsuits or other legal proceedings against the condo association
• Current condominium fee
• Current special assessment, if any
• Balance sheet
• Statement of income and expenses
• Condominium association's annual budget
• Disclosure of any anticipated increases in contributions beyond inflation
The Housing Partnership has the discretion to deny approval of a grant if it determines
that the condo association is unstable, has pending or proposed lawsuits against it that
might render it financially unstable, or is considering special assessments that might
make the condo unaffordable to the purchaser. In such case, the Housing Partnership will
reimburse the grant winner for the costs of any inspections.
Success Factors in Adoption and Implementation. The Town had the capacity to
develop and implement this program through the following important operational
components:
• The Town had a designated municipal entity to oversee the program, the Housing
Partnership, which had been instrumental in preparing a Housing Plan that
included this affordable housing strategy
• The program secured the expertise of the Marshfield Housing Authority to
coordinate the application and selection processes, the determination of eligibility
and the lottery process.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
50
• The Town had the professional expertise of a CPA -funded Housing Coordinator
and Housing Consultant who have substantial experience in affordable housing
finance and development.
Issues to Consider/Do Differently: The Town is seeking to amend the program
regulations to extend the life of the Ready Buyer List. It was initially good for only one
funding cycle; therefore, if any applicants had not been offered an award, they would
have had to reapply in the next funding round. Now, if there are more applicants than
available funding, rather than reapply in future rounds, they would simply be subject to
re -verification.
The Town will amend its application to ask about previous foreclosures or bankruptcy
One applicant was able to obtain a pre -qualification letter in spite of serious credit issues.
Not surprisingly, this applicant had difficulty obtaining a mortgage that meets LIP
guidelines and has decided to purchase outside of the program with assistance from
relatives. Although the Town would allow someone in the lottery even if past credit
issues were disclosed, earlier notice of potential credit issues will allow the Town to work
more intensively with the applicant and the lender to be sure that financing will be in
place when needed.
The Town continues to look at the issue of whether it should consider building in a more
robust way to handle homes that might require a modest amount of work. This would
expand the number of homes that would be acceptable under program guidelines, but at
higher cost to the program both in terms of funding and administrative time.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 51
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
CITY OF NEWTON
Name of Program. First Time Homebuver Program (FTHP)
Type of Program. Mortgage Assistance Program (direct financial assistance to
qualifying purchasers who locate their own unit)
Contact: Julia Harnatz McAneny, City of Newton Housing Office, 617-796-1149,
imcanenv 2i newtonma.eov
Funding Commitments: More than $1.8 million has been committed to the FTHP and
NX Program (described below) since these initiatives were introduced in 2001,
leveraging almost $6.5 million in total financing. The program has expended almost
$600,000 in CPA funding to date with more than another million dollars coming from
HOME and CDBG funding. The Housing Office is in the process of requesting an
additional $968,800 in CPA funds. Approximately two-thirds of the funding is directed
to FTHP and the other third to the NX Program to the greatest extent possible.
Current Status: The program has assisted 25 purchasers thus far (they will hold the
closing for another homebuyer next month) with average incomes of about $75,000. Ten
of these purchasers have participated in the Newton Connection Program (see below).
The average purchase price has been $274,332. Two of the properties have been single-
family homes, one a two-family home, and the remaining units have been condos.
Summary Description. The Program was developed to help qualifying applicants
purchase their first home. A deferred loan of up to $100,000 is offered as buy -down
assistance toward the purchase of an eligible property through a combination of federal
HOME funding and local CPA funds as well. The funds are not required to be paid back
provided that the homebuyer has complied with the deed restrictions and other program
terms and conditions including that the property be used as the owner's principal
residence. No payments are required unless the property is refinanced or conveyed.
Funding assistance may also include a forgivable grant of up to a maximum of $15,000
in CDBG funding that can be used toward either the good faith offer made on a Purchase
and Sale Agreement or for closing costs. The grant cannot be used to pay points on a
mortgage, reduce the interest rate or exceed the actual amount of closing costs although
applicants may be reimbursed for closing costs up to the maximum. The grant is secured
as a lien against the property and forgiven at 20% per year over five (5) years. If the
property is sold or conveyed during the five years, the applicants must repay the grant on
a pro rata basis. For example, if the property were sold during the third year following
the closing, 60% of the grant would have to be repaid. Applicants must submit a HUD -1
RESPA form if they want to receive closing cost assistance. Upon the buyer's request,
this form can be provided by the mortgage lender and includes a good faith estimate of all
closing costs.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 52
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
Program participants can obtain mortgage financing from the lender of their choice but
are encouraged to explore special mortgage programs such as MassHousing's Municipal
Mortgage Program and MHP's Soft Second Loan Program.
The Program also has maximum purchase prices that vary by dwelling type as follows:
Type of Property Maximum Purchase Price
Single-family $555,750
Two-family $570,000
Three-family $562,875
Condominium $384,750
Newton's Community Development Authority acts as the contracting party and signatory
on behalf of the Newton Housing Office with respect to the provision of funding
assistance.
Eligibility Criteria: Applicants must have combined household gross income at or below
80% of area median income and must demonstrate that they have had no ownership
interest in real estate for the prior three (3) years, unless they are a displaced homemaker
Additionally, I% of the combined household assets is also added to the gross income
figure. The property must be located within the City of Newton boundaries.
All applicants must complete a certified homebuyer course, submitting a copy of the
Certificate of Completion prior to closing. They must also attend a post purchase
counseling class provided by the City of Newton within six (6) months following the
closing. Moreover, if the applicants have less than perfect credit, they may also be
required to take credit and/or financial management classes as a prerequisite to the receipt
of funding assistance.
All of the CPA funding is used for those who meet community preference criteria and
can document that they live or work in Newton, have a child enrolled in Newton schools
(Kindergarten through 12th grade in public or private schools), or have graduated from a
Newton high school.
Application and Selection Process: Applications are available at the City's Housing
Office as well as online. Applicants are required to be in regular contact with the
Housing Office throughout the process, extending through the search for a property and
the closing. Funds are available on a first-come, first-served basis to eligible applicants,
provided funds remain available. Documents that must be submitted include:
• A completed application (consists of personal and household composition
information, as well as extensive income, financial liability and employment
information).
• The application must also include a pre -approval letter from a lending institution
indicating willingness to provide mortgage financing.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
53
Following approval of the application, the applicants must submit additional
documentation including:
• Authorization and permission for their lender to provide financial information to
the Newton Housing Office including the mortgage commitment that
demonstrates financing must be within the affordability limit based on a 33%
front-end ratio meaning that no more than 33% of the applicant's total gross
income shall be paid toward principal, interest, taxes and insurance. The lender
must also provide the Housing Office with a certified appraisal of the property
and any other materials deemed relevant by the Newton Housing Office.
• HUD -1 RESPA form if the applicant wants to receive closing cost assistance that
includes a good faith estimate of all closing costs that can be provided by the
lender upon the request of the applicant.
• Signed Offer to Purchase Real Estate.
• Notice of Visual Inspection.
• Singed Purchase and Sale Agreement.
• A declaration of affordable housing covenant (deed rider) that is recorded at the
Registry of Deeds that ensures that the property remains affordable in perpetuity
upon resale indexed to increases in HUD area median income and with some
allowance for capital improvements. At closing the applicant will also be asked
to sign a Mortgage, Note, Grant Agreement, a Uniform Commercial Code Form
1, a Truth in Lending Disclosure Statement and a Lead Notification document.
• Certificates of Completion of necessary homebuyer courses.
After receiving a copy of the executed Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Newton
Housing Office issues a commitment letter that details its funding assistance, conditions
for receiving this assistance, and other materials that are necessary to get to closing.
Property Inspection. The Newton Housing Office sends an inspector out to the property
to determine compliance with HUD Housing Quality Standards, but also strongly
encourages prospective purchasers to hire their own licensed home inspector. This
inspection is conducted at no expense to the seller or prospective purchasers.
Prior to occupancy the property must comply with the HUD Housing Quality Standards
as required by the federal HOME Program and lead paint regulations. Therefore, all
necessary improvements or lead paint remediation must be completed, and homebuyers
are required to delead the unit within six (6) months of occupancy, if the inspection
indicates that lead paint exists. Homebuyers may be able to access the City's Housing
Rehabilitation Fund for financial assistance to make the needed improvements as grant
funds and low-interest loans are available to qualifying applicants.
Success Factors in Adoption and Implementation: The City of Newton has a
professional housing staff to coordinate the program and a substantial and relatively
predictable funding stream. They are not constrained by LIP requirements and can use
their CPA funding more flexibly even restricting these funds to those who meet
community preference criteria.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 54
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
Issues to Consider/Do Differently: There has been some thought on reducing the 33%
front-end ratio to 30% for the purposes of reselling units to those earning at a lower
income level — at 70% of area median income. However, there have only been four
resales to date, none of which have involved any additional infusions of subsidy funds.
Name of Program. Newton Connection Homebuver Program (NX)
Type of Program: Mortgage Assistance Program (direct financial assistance to
qualifying purchasers who locate their own unit)
Contact: Julia Hamatz McAneny, City of Newton Housing Office, 617-796-1149,
imcanenv(newtonma.Qov
Funding Commitments. See FTHP above— program allocations are combined.
Current Status. Thus far ten (10) purchasers have been assisted through the NX
Program and another will receive their subsidy next month.
Summary Description. The Program operates the same as the First Time Homebuyer
Program described above except for the following major components:
• There are no maximum purchase price limits.
• Applicants must have a connection to Newton and can document that they live or
work in Newton, have a child enrolled in Newton schools (Kindergarten through
12t grade in public or private schools), or have graduated from a Newton high
school.
If an applicant owns any property outside of Newton, the equity on that property is added
to their income in the determination of eligibility making it very difficult to qualify for
program assistance. Newton residents, on the other hand, may own other existing
property that is not taken into consideration in determining eligibility
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 55
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
TOWN OF SANDWICH
Name of Program: Sandwich Home Ownership Proeram (SHOP)
Type of Program. Buy -down Program (units purchased and rehabbed by some entity
and then subsidized and sold to qualifying first-time homebuyers)
Contact: Nancy Davison, Housing Assistance Corporation (HAC), 508-771-5400,
ndavison( haconcaoecod.ore
Funding Commitments: The Town of Sandwich secured $1.25 million as a payment in lieu of
four (4) affordable units being built on a residential development project in East Sandwich that
was under Cape Cod Commission review This was accomplished via negotiations with a private
developer, the Cape Cod Commission, and Housing Assistance Corporation (HAC).
Current Status: Seven (7) existing single-family homes (one two-bcdroom and six, three-
bedroom units) in the private housing stock were converted to long-term affordability, enabling
qualifying first-time homebuyers to purchase their own homes and afford to remain in Sandwich.
The houses were scattered throughout the town, indistinguishable from neighboring homes as
subsidized. Five (5) of the homes were sold to first-time buyers who lived, worked or had
immediate farnily living in Sandwich prior to purchasing.
HAC completed the project within twelve (12) months, from designation as the project
administrator to final occupancy of the units. The houses were sold for approximately $150,000
and the subsidy per unit was a bit higher at about $200,000.
Summary Description. The Cape Cod Commission selected the Housing Assistance
Corporation (HAC), the Cape's regional nonprofit housing organization, to coordinate this effort
to invest the $1.25 million in a buy -down project involving the purchase of existing housing
units, completion of necessary improvements, and the use of subsidies to enable first-time
homebuyers earning at or below 80% of area median income to purchase the units. HAC was
also able to secure some additional funding from the Federal Home Loan Bank and Barnstable
HOME Consortium of $7,500 and $20,000 per unit, respectively
Eligibility Criteria: As the Town wanted the units to count as part of the Subsidized
Housing Inventory, all applicants had to meet Local Initiative Program (LIP)
requirements.
Application and Selection Process: Eligible buyers were identified from HAC's Ready
Buyers List, which had been effectively used to identify potential buyers for the resale of
deed restricted homcs. All applicants on this list had sclf-ccrtified their household
income and supplied a pre -approval letter from a lending institution. The Ready to Buy
applicants were selected a first-come, first-served basis. The list was affirmatively
marketed to the community via print media, public information sessions, and by mailings
to the affirmative marketing mailing list currently used by HAC to market affordable
housing opportunities as they arise.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
56
Inspection Process. HAC has its own internal capacity to hire licensed inspectors to
determine what repairs would be necessary, estimate the costs of these improvements,
and contract out for the work prior to occupancy HAC looked for properties that
required only minor work of not more than about $5,000.
Success Factors in Adoption and Implementation: Negotiations among the Town, Commission
staff, and HAC produced a plan for the use of the funds that would create more than the 10%
affordable units required by the Commission. This plan was critical in enabling the Commission
to be willing to relax its regulatory prohibition against cash in lieu of actual units.
While the developer's liability was to provide enough funding to support a projected four (4)
affordable units, HAC was able to make the program work for seven (7) instead given their
ability to purchase homes in the more affordable range of the private housing market, leverage
some additional subsidy funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank and Barnstable HOME
Consortium, control the costs of repairs, and efficiently oversee the project.
HAC had the capacity to coordinate the purchase of the units as well as the management of the
purchaser selection process through its Cape Community Real Estate Program and insure that the
units would Mull all state requirements under the Local Initiative Program (LIP) to allow them
to count as affordable and part of the Subsidized Housing Inventory It also had the intcmal
capacity to make all necessary repairs to ensure that new owners would be free from any major
expenses for at least the first five (5) years, managed by 1 -IAC's Development Department.
The project involved a true partnership between the public, private and non-profit sectors with
the Town and the Commission negotiating with a private developer on the amount of subsidy for
the project and working with HAC on project development and implementation.
This is a prototype that could be used by communities with subsidies from the Community
Preservation Fund and/or HOME funding. The following is a proposed breakdown of the
budgetary requirements per unit, premised on being able to find a suitable home or condo on the
market for $300,00015
PROPOSED USES
Acquisition costs $300,000
Legal fees $2,000
Home inspection $500
21E inspection'b $850
2 mos. mortgage/interest payments $2,000
Insurance $120
Repairs $5,000
Uti litics/heat $1,000
Overhead/administration $15,000
Total Uses $326,470
15 More subsidy funds would be required for those communities with higher market values such as Lexingto
16 Environmental inspection required if HOME funding is used.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
57
PROPOSED SOCRCES'7
Selling price $150,000
CPA funds $176,470
Total Sources $326,470
For some of the SHOP homes HOME and Federal Home Loan Bank funds were used which equaled $20,000 and
$7,500 per home respectively
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 58
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
TOWN OF SUDBURY
Name of Program. Home Preservation Program
Type of Program: Hybrid (homebuyers purchase properties identified by the Town,
however. the applicants enter into the Purchase and Sale Agreement and are given the
subsidy directly at the closing)
Contact: Beth Rust, Housing Specialist/Program Administrator. 978-639-3388,
rustbna,sudburv.ma.us
Funding Commitments: $500,000 in Community Preservation funding approved at
Town Meeting in 2005 for buy -down of market units.
Current Status. The Home Preservation Program has provided funding for the purchase
of two (2) properties by qualifying households to date, the second closing taking place
just recently on August 26, 2008.
Summary Description: This program is another hybrid of the more conventional
mortgage assistance programs which provide subsidy funds directly to prospective
purchasers who find the property in the private housing market, and what are typically
referred to as buy -down programs, where sone entity, in this case the Town, acting
through the Sudbury Housing Trust, locates the property to be purchased. The Horne
Preservation Program was a specific use of CPA funds to purchase small, single -lot,
detached older homes (or "tear downs"), and preserve them for first-time homebuyers.
The funding appropriation was directed to not only purchasing existing homes in the
private housing market, but also to subsidizing additional units in private comprehensive
permit projects to create more affordable units in these developments. In the program, the
properties are subject to an affordable housing restriction, and the Town subsidizes the
difference between the market price and the affordable price from the previously
appropriated Community Preservation Act funds.
The Town has hired a Housing Specialist that coordinates affordable housing issues and
administers this program. The Town in fact searches the market for a property within its
"price point", at about $350,000 in the case of Sudbury, which is at the lowest end of the
market in this community [Currently, there are only twenty homes for sale under
$500,000 in Sudbury ] This market price, plus consideration for some repairs creates a
gap of approximately $200,000 given the maximum affordable purchase price of about
$175,000 when using state LIP requirements. Thus $200,000 has been the maximum per
unit subsidy for the program.
Once a property has been located and a price negotiated, the Town, now through the
Sudbury Housing Trust, enters into an Offer to Purchase and obtains an option on the
property with nominal and fully refundable funds from the program allocation. At this
point, the top "ready buyer" from the Ready Buyer List, created through a prior lottery
held for this purpose, is askcd to view the property and if still interested, enters into a
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
59
Purchase and Sale Agreement. To date, buyer and CPA funding have also been used to
fund the buyer's costs in securing the PSA. Those who view an identified home but are
not interested in purchasing it for any reason can still remain on the Ready Buyers List,
but go to the bottom of the list and the next applicant on the list is notified and asked to
view the home.
Eligibility Criteria: These units are considered Local Action Units under the state's
Local Initiative Program (LIP) and thus all LIP eligibility requirements must be met.
These are described in more detail in the Bourne and Marshfield summaries.
Application Process: The Town, now through the Sudbury Housing Trust, coordinates
the marketing of the program and pre -qualifies applicants to create -a Ready Buyers List.
Through a lottery these pre -qualified applicants are ranked and the Town begins working
with the first ranking applicant, helping them purchase an identified property, and
proceeds down the list to encumber available funds.
Inspection Process: The program has engaged licensed local home inspectors to inspect
the homes prior to the execution of a Purchase and Sale Agreement to determine repair
needs. The program obtains three estimates for any necessary major repair work and
pays the selected contractor directly In one case they also gave the new buyer an
allowance to have the more minor improvements done.
In regard to lead paint, the first house had a lead paint inspection revealing small amounts
on the old windows. These were all replaced. No inspection was commissioned for the
second home, as the buyer had a child in high school. The Sudbury Housing Trust
understands that lead remediation may be needed in a future resale.
Success Factors in Adoption and Implementation. The program maintains some
flexibility with respect to each purchase, allowing procedures to respond to the diverse
needs of buyers and sellers as well as the conditions of the property This hands-on
approach, while more time-consuming, has been responsive to the individual needs of
each of the purchasers, allowing them to ultimately purchase their first home.
Additionally, the program is designed to not only take advantage of the more affordable
units in the existing private housing market, but also to increase the number of affordable
units in private Chapter 40B developments. The Town has negotiated three additional
units in three specific comprehensive permit projects, but sluggish market conditions
have substantially delayed the construction of these developments.
Issues to Consider/Do Differently: In the future, the Town will compensate the buyer
for the increased property taxes on the HUD -1 settlement statement at the closing until
the assessment cycle can adjust the value of the home. It is important to work with the
Assessor's Office for this transaction as well as the Bank's appraiser as the value of the
property changes significantly during the closing. Depending on the timing, the property
taxes may be reflecting the market value before the restriction was placed for almost a
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
60
full fiscal year. Needless to say, this impacts the affordability of the housing unit for the
buyer.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 61
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
CITY OF WALTHAM
Name of Program. Downnavment Assistance Program
Type of Program. Mortgage Assistance Program (direct financial assistance to
qualifying purchasers who locate their own units)
Contact: Janet Barry, Director, Waltham Housing Division — Planning Department, 781-
314-3382. ibarrvecity waltham.ma.us
Funding Commitments: The program is funded with federal HOME funds at
approximately $270,000 annually
Current Status: Since the Program was introduced in 1995, 94 first-time homebuyers
have been assisted through the program and 23 have already repaid their loan. There are
currently 12 prospective purchasers participating in the program, looking for properties.
Summary Description. The City of Waltham provides HOME Program funding to
subsidize first-time homebuyer opportunities for those interested in purchasing a home or
condo in Waltham, providing up to 17% of the purchase price not to exceed $62,000,
holding a second mortgage on the property The subsidy is in the form of a no interest,
nonamortizing deferred loan, the full amount that is due upon the sale or transfer of the
property unless the homeowner fails to meet the conditions of the program including but
not limited to the following:
• The unit does not meet HUD Housing Quality Standards
• The property ceases to be the primary residence of all the borrowers for the full
term of the loan
• Any applicable limitations on tenant income and rent are not met and an updated
and signed Homeowners Performance Agreement is not submitted to the City
The purchase price of the property may not exceed the following limits imposed under
the federal HOME Program.
• Condominium $300,000
• Single-family home $362,790
• Two-family house $461,113
• Three-family house $560,231
• Four -family house $646,421
Eligibility Criteria: All program participants must have income at or below 80% of area
median income and meet other criteria including:
• Provide at least a 3% down payment, using their own funds;
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
62
• Combined household assets should not exceed $50,00018,
• Borrower(s) must obtain a first mortgage with a fixed rate from a lending
institution;
• First-time homebuyer;
• Must complete an approved first-time homebuyer class;
• If assistance is requested for multi -family properties, federal HOME Program
requirements apply with respect to rent levels, tenant incomes, and tenant
protections;
• In the event that an applicant purchases a multi -unit property, no tenant can be
displaced in the purchase process;
• The property must meet HUD Housing Quality Standards; and
• The property must meet state and federal lead paint regulations.
Application and Selection Process: Applicants are required to complete an application,
which includes the submission of all income and assets documentation and the
certification of completion of an approved homebuyer education class.19 The application
form includes a list of available classes with contact and location information.
Applications are reviewed for initial eligibility in the order they are received by the
Waltham Housing Department. Following this review, the Housing Department will
notify applicants by mail whether they are ineligible or are determined eligible on a
preliminary basis, which is not a financial or legal commitment on the part of the City to
issue a loan. Nevertheless. at this point the Housing Department sets -aside funds for this
applicant for a period of one year. If such funding is not available, the applicant is placed
on a waiting list until new funding becomes available. At this point applicants are
encouraged to look for a home or condo. Applicants are instructed to keep the Housing
Department informed of their progress, and the City reserves the right to remove an
applicant from the list for failure to purchase a home within one year after they received
their preliminary determination of eligibility
It is strongly advised that the applicants contact a local lender for a mortgage pre -
approval before entering into a Purchase and Sale Agreement, and they must provide
such letter to the City at the Purchase and Sale stage.
After signing the P&S and satisfactory completion of all its requirements, the City issues
a Commitment Letter to the applicant. The City of Waltham does not provide
rehabilitation funds for perspective properties. However, it does provide lead paint
removal funding, and the removal must be done BEFORE the owner moves in.
18 Assets include liquid assets such as cash in checking or savings accounts, stocks. bonds, certificates of
deposit, Treasury bills, equity in real estate and other forms of capital investments, excluding equity
accounts in homeownership programs or state -assisted public housing escrow accounts. Retirement
accounts and pension funds, IRA, 401K, Keogh Accounts are considered assets if the applicants has access
to these funds. Personal property such as furniture and automobiles not held as investments are excluded.
Married couples must attend these homebuyer courses together.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 63
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
The Housing Department requires four weeks, at a minimum, to prepare for the closing
that includes completion of the following items:
+ Notice of Non -Displacement or notice of Eligibility will be sent to the existing
tenants, if applicable;
• Notice will be sent to the seller regarding program participation;
• An environmental review will be conducted to insure that the property is not in a
Flood Zone;
+ Applicant forwards the appraisal from the lender to the Housing Department, and
• Applicant signs a lead paint notification, a HOME Loan Commitment Letter and a
Truth in Lending Statement, the forms provided by the Housing Department.
The City requires at least 30 days notice to close, and the HOME Program loan will be
closed at the Housing Department. The borrower and a representative from the Housing
Department will then proceed to the closing on the first mortgage.
The Housing Department will contact applicants every six months to insure that it has
updated income documentation to reverify eligibility
Inspection Process: The Waltham Housing Department's rehab program inspector will
inspect the identified property at no cost to the applicant to determine if it meets HUD
Housing Quality Standards and state and federal lead paint regulations and if not, what
specific repairs and costs are involved, The City also pays for the lead paint inspection
and any necessary removal with its HOME and/or CDBG funding. The Housing
Department typically does not support the purchase of units that require much work.
Success Factors in Adoption and Implementation: The Program is administered by
experienced staff who have worked in the housing and community development field for
years and have expertise in complying with federal HOME Program, requirements.
Additionally, because the program uses HOME funding, it is more likely to have access
to greater amounts of funding on a more predictable annual basis. The Housing
Department also has the capacity to coordinate its own property inspections and cover
some costs through its existing lead paint abatement program. It can also provide
funding through its rehab program if the owners are eligible and apply at some point after
occupancy
One issue that other HOME consortium members struggle with is whether or not to place
deed restrictions on these properties. Waltham does not, and this policy may be one of
the reasons it has been such a successful program. The Housing Department feels it is
sufficient to recapture the monies invested upon resale. The small number of DPA loans
they provide in a year, about eight, do not have any major effect on the Subsidized
Housing Inventory, although it is likely to have a greater impact in other communities.
Because it is so difficult financially for low-income buyers to afford these properties, the
Housing Department does not support the purchase of housing that requires rehabilitation
immediately It has been fortunate, so to speak, that the real estate market has stagnated a
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 64
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
bit, and that there are some condo developments where the units are substantially below
the HOME purchase price limits.
Issues to Consider/Do Differently• The Housing Department may raise the asset limits
at some point in the future, perhaps to $75,000.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
65
III. CONCLUSION
As mentioned in the introduction, the programs summarized in this report represent a
relatively wide variety of approaches for promoting and subsidizing homeownership. In
moving forward towards developing a Statement of Objectives. it will be important to
consider the following issues:
• Availability of professional support to manage the program;
• Relative roles of the Housing Partnership and LexHAB;
• Importance of having units count as part of the Subsidized Housing Inventory and
meet LIP requirements and/or ability to serve those earning up to 100% of area
median income;
• Consider programmatic approaches (Are properties available — even adaptive
reuse — that can be purchased at reasonable cost? Would prospective buyers be
able to locate such properties? Would it be feasible to have LexHAB purchase
the properties and manage the resale to eligible homeowners?);
• Potential for piggy -backing subsidies onto private development to increase
numbers of affordable units:
• Implement program as a pilot effort to determine effectiveness and fine -lune
program parameters as necessary; and
• Opportunities to piggyback administration on another existing program.
In the context of this report and through future deliberations, it will also be useful to
prioritize program goals and objectives. Overall program goals did vary by community
in large part related to local needs and unique circumstances. For example, the program
manager in Cambridge indicated that a major goal was to provide support to enable
individuals and families to permanently settle in Cambridge, not just stay for awhile and
move to another place to raise their families, and to provide assistance for those who are
not eligible for other programs given state or federal restrictions. In Martha's Vineyard
there was a defined goal of providing affordable housing for a wide range of incomes to
the greatest extent possible, including its workforce. In Bourne there was a keen interest
in investing CPA funding to promote scattered -site homeownership opportunities. In
Newton there was a clear recognition of the importance of maintaining social and
economic diversity by providing permanent homes for those priced out of the housing
market. Local conditions and priorities will drive program development efforts in
Lexington, leading into the next phase of program planning.
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
66
ATTACHMENT 1
Summary of Programs
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs 67
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
Lexington Housing Partnership Survey of Affordable Homeowner Assistance Programs
Community Type Funding Status LIP Deed Rider Max. Subsidy Target Market
$300,000 CPA plus $150,000 (average is
Acton Hybrid* other funding 8 Yes Yes much less( At or below 80% AMI
Bedford Buy -down $161,200 CPA 1 in 2002 No for I st Yes Not set At or below 80% AMI
Recently implemented; no
Bourne Hybrid* $298,000 CPA units to date Yes Yes $20,000/bedroom At or below 80% AMI
Mortgage For condos in 6+ $100K to $175K
Assistance $400K to $700K in unit condo depending on type of
Brookline Program (MAP( HOME and CDBG 61 No associations unit At or below 80% AMI
$4.6 million in own
Cambridge MAP funds 41 No Yes $130,000 At or below 100% AMI
Chatham MAP 5255,000 CPA 1 fo date Yes* Yes 560,000 Al or below 80% AMI
Chatham Balfour Lane Buy -down, Lower
project Cape Cod CDC $285,000 CPA 4 Yes* Yes NA Al or below 80% AMI
Chilmark Aft. Housing 560,000 CPA Funding 1/3 of monthly
Mortgage Interest Asst. reallocated to Helm mortgage interest
Program MAP Home Loan 0 No Yes payments At or below 100% AMI
Up to $25,000 piggy-
Chilmark/Martha's Vineyard $265,000 CPA and back to Land Lease
Helm Home Loan Hybrid* IAHF 9 No Yes Program At or below 140% AMI
Martha' Vineyard Land Lease Funding from AIHF No but some
Program Land lease and CPA 22 40B's Yes Varies by project At or below 140% AMI
$45,000-$75,000
depending on #
Marshfield MAP $485,000 CPA Working with 2 purchasers Yes Yes bedrooms At or below 80% AMI
$1.8 million CPA,
Newton MAP HOME and CDBG 26 No Yes $115,000 At or below 80% AMI
Buy -down
Housing Assist.
Sandwich Corp. $1442,500 in subsidies 7 Yes Yes NA At or below 80% AMI
Sudbury Hybrid* 5500,000 CPA 2 Yes Yes $200,000 At or below 80% AMI
$270,000/year HOME
Waltham MAP funds 94 No No
$62,000 At or below 80% AMI
*Hybrid represents a mix of technigpes such as the town setting up properties for purchase wilh the quarfied homeowners given a subsidy at closing.
Attachment 2
Similarities and Differences with Lexington
Affordable Homebuyer Assistance Programs
Survey of Other Massachusetts Municipal Programs
68
Community
Acton
Bourne
Brookline
Cambridge
Similarities and Differences with Lexington
Similarities
ACHC operates like LexHAB, allocated CPA funds
Provide $10K Down Payment Assistance
Works with pre -approved Ready Buyers List
Establishes Approved Properties List
Inspects properties, follows DHCD guidelines
Loan assistance to qualified buyers
Buyers locate own unit
Authorized 4 loans per year
$460,000 property limit, 80%AMI
Loan assistance to qualified buyers, CPA funds
First -Time Homebuyers locate own unit
$130,000 grant ceiling, deed restriction, 100%AMI
Equity sharing and allowance for capital improvements
Chatham Inspects properties, follows DHCD guidelines
Seller pays required fixups inc. lead paint rem.
Chatham Chatham preference (non SHI now, maybe later)
Balfour Lane project 4 80% condo units (3 mkt units) CPA and Private Funds
Chilmark Mortgage interest subsidies, deed restriction
Aff. Housing Mortgage
Interest Asst. Program
Chi!mark/Martha's
Vineyard
Helm Home Loan
Subsidy thru IAHF (30 yr 1 %int. loan)
Ground leasing (80%-100%AMI) and 2nd Mortgage
CPA and private funds
Martha' Vineyard Homeowner owns improvements
Land Lease Program Land Trust controls use and sale
50%-140% AMI, $140K -$330K sale prices
CPA funds from participating communities
Marshfield
CPA funding, Housing Partnership administers program
Uses Mansfield Housing Authority for applic./selection
Bedroom based grants for house or condo
Grant doen't apply to SHI units
Follows DHCD LIP procedures, comprehensive inspection
Newton HOME, CDBG and CPA funds
CPA funds used with Newton preference (80%AMI)
Differences Findings
Condos not stand alone homes New construction preferred
Uses Housing Authority to manage rentals Homeownership tax advantages not widely known
Housing Specialist
Can use Dept. of Agriculture Mortgages
$20,000 per bedroom subsidy limit
Only Condos so far
Considering increasing subsidy limits
Housing Development Manager and Housing Project Planner
HOME and CDBG funds no CPA
Large population of Condos
Homebuyer Coordinator
Buyers responsible for inspections
Loan limits recently increased
City able to formulate own requirements
40 of 41 participants chose condos
Chatham Housing Authority ($15K CPA funds)
$60K Subsidy, max market price $240K Rigorous affirmative mktg and buyer pre-qual implemented now
Lower Cape Cod CDC managed redevelopment
Moving to fair marketing and 70% Chatham for future owners
Now using !sland Afford. Housing Fund Incentive insufficient with deed restriction
Regional IAHF Management and matching funds
Island Housing Trust and Dukes County Regional Housing Authority
Helm Home Loan involved Success based on $1.3M raised annually
Island Housing Trust develops properties
Trust acquires property @ $25-$35K per unit
Housing Authority would manage rentals Program tweaked as lessons learned
Marshfield Housing Coordinator and fHousing Consultant
Plan to extend life of Ready Buyer list
Inclusionary Zoning ByLaw contributes funds
Tightening credit rules
Considering including homes that require a modest amount of work
rules
Newton Community Development Authority
Well staffed Newton Housing Office
10/27/2008 Page 1 of 2
.7
Community
Sandwich
Sudbury
Waltham
Similarities
Deferred loan up to $100,000, Purchase Limits to $570K
Forgiven at 20% per year over 5 yrs.
Deed rider with some allowance for improvernents
Not constrained by LIP requirements
Forgivable closing cost grant (up to $15K)
Units purchased and rehabbed
CPA subsidy per unit $200K
HOME and Fedi Home Loan Bank Funds used
1st Time Homebuyers 80%AMI, LIP process
Town locates property and pre -qualifies unit
CPA funds to $200K per unit, LIP 80%AMI
Property purchase point around $350K
Town inspects and pays for mods
Loan 17% of Purchase Price up to 562K
No interest deferred loan to 1st time homebuyers
80%AMI, HOME funds $270K per year.
Differences Findings
Newton housing office inspects properties
Newton Connection (NIX) Program has no purchase price Limit
Cape Cod Commission
Housing Assistance Corp.
Used 51.25M in lieu of affordable housing
Considering modifying resale conditions
Developer produced 3 added affordable units
Sudbury Housing Trust used to make purchase offer
Housing Specialist
Added 40B development units are considered
Need to work with Assessor re. Property taxes
Watham Housing Division Considering deed restrictions in the future
Experienced housing specialists on staff May raise asset limits to $75K in future
10/21/2008 Page 2 of 2