HomeMy WebLinkAboutStudies/Building Evaluation for the Lexington Fire Headquarters by Maguire Group, 2008Studies / Building Evaluation
for the Lexington Fire Headquarters
Presentation to: Town of Lexington, MA
Maguire Group
Infrastructure for the real world
rchitects/Engineers/Planners
Office Locations
New Britain, Connecticut
ami, Tallahassee and Tampa, Florida.
Foxbbrough, Massachusetts (HQ)
Portsmouth, New. Hampshire
Harrisburg and Philadelphia,
Pehnaylvahia
Pittsb'Urgh, Pennsylvania
Providence, Rhode Island
Christiansted, St, Croix, U.S: Virgin
Islands
• Founded in 1938
• Has grown to include
11 offices in 7 states
plus USVI with +210
employees
• Specialize in Public Safety
Facilities
• Nearly 90% repeat
business
• Award-winning
services
ngineers/Planners_
Maguire Group was commissioned to perform a
comprehensive building evaluation of the Lexington Fire
Headquarters
■ Part 1 - Evaluate the condition of the existing facility
■ Part II - Performa space needs study
■ Part Ill - Provide possible solutions on hove to resolve
issues identified in Part :I: and 11
Part I -Building Assessment.:...
cltitects/Engineers/Planneers
Existing Conditions -
• Civil
• Architectural
•Life Safety and Code Compliance
•Building Accessibility
•Waterproofing Systems
•Integrity of Doors, Windows and Exterior Walls
•Interior Finishes
• Structural
• Mechanical
• Plumbing/Fire Protection
• Electrical
• Hazardous Materials
.4
ngirieers/Planrrers
0.4
is/Engineers/Planner
rehitects/Engineers/Planners
chitects/Engineers/Planners
rchitects/Engineers/Plsnners
chitects/Engineers/Planners
rchitects/Engineers/Planners
rchrtectsfEngineers/P!anrrers
• The overhead apparatus bay doors are too narrow and low.
• The width and depth of the apparatus bay are too narrow
and shallow for today's larger vehicles.
• The apparatus bay cannot accommodate all of the stations
vehicles.
• The Administrative area is insufficiently sized.
• The current stations circulation is convoluted.
• Due to lack of dedicated storage spaces, a lot of the
apparatus bay is being utilized by storage of equipment or
fitness equipment.
• Gear storage is occupying valuable apparatus space.
• Only one diminutive toilet room is ,located within the
apparatus bay.
• There are no public toilet rooms.
• Breathing air tanks are currently filled: within theapparatus
bay.
• The facility does not have a decontamination area.
rchitects/Engineers/Planners
• There is no oil/sand interceptor for the apparatus bay
• There is no dedicated laundry area, and no washer
extractor for gear washing.
• Fire fighters living quarters, dormitories, kitchen . are all
undersized.
• The existing second floor male toilet room is the original
construction and in need of upgrade.
• There is no janitors closet on the second floor. The original
janitor's closet has been renovated into a small women's
room.
• The existing apparatus bay approach slab is bituminous
concrete and not structural concrete and in need of repairs.
girreersiPlanners
redriiecfs/Engineers/Planners
Architects/Engineers/Planners
Based on the evaluation the options available to the
Town of Lexington are:
■ Option A — Construct an apparatus addition to the
rear of the existing facility.
• Option B — Tear down the existing facility and
construct a new Fire Headquarters.
• Option C
Maintain the station asis, andperform
the modifications identified in Part 1 of the
report.
rchitects/EngineersiPlanners
0 RESCUE DEPARTMENT
SITE PIAN - OPTION A
rc ec s ngtneers/Planrrers
ti'ttit. 1j htifN•
e•4 ca'
i • rw.
11111"%in
ilh ‘ellt
6.111 WS
Ina
111)."
Nib
11111111a
LEVNGTON
AREMD RESCUE DEPARTMENT
DECIMEMIXI
GROUND LEVEL - OPTION A
Architects-/Engineers/Planners
El EMIG
0 ADIRISTPATON
o.1W111011001117
cffiCALMION
PlaiC
9EtllkOU
IE70NOTON
FRE AND RESCUE DEPARIMENI
moe
IJ"PPFiEVF1 PIAN
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
;/ \
•
r/ \•
'1/4.,
/
UPPER LEVEL - OPTION A
rchntects/Engineers/Planners
LEXINGTON
RESCUE DEPAIVIAENT
one
FDOSTINGWINIT ELEVATION
IUIIIuI.,7=3;";
n"ItiLlifJPx,
ED ELEVATION-IrONA
WEST ELEVATION
rehitects/Engineers/Pfanners
ppm NORTH ELEVATION
9v iv
LEXINGTON
AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT
CECOMERINIS
OP9EED NORTH ELEVATION -OPTION y
NORTH ELEVATION
rchitects/EngineersIPlanners
Option A — Advantages
• The existing station is salvaged.
• The apparatus bay structural issues are no longer an issue.
• The "historic" facade of the facility is unchanged.
• The addition is at the rear of the facility and it will
minimally impact the rest of the building.
• Phased construction — the fire department does not need
to relocate during construction.
• Very little demolition.
• Front apron and some rear parking will be reclaimed as
landscape area.
• Less expensive then new construction,
Aryl
c
ngineers/Planners
Option A — Disadvantages
• Due to the site restrictions and placement of the existing
building, not all of the programmed spaces will be
accommodated.
• Phased construction, will require additional time to
construct.
• Some of the existing inherited building elements will
dictate the layout of the new plan
• The fire department will need to; co -exist with the
construction through the station renovation.
rchitecfs/Engineers/Planners
Y
LEXINGTON
REANDRESCUE DEPARIMENT
DECENBERETA
v¢
SITE PLAN - OPTION B
P Option
a rt
rcititects/ErigitieersIPlanners
LEXINGTON
FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT
DECE110/41
iGARIN LEVEL PLAN
GROUND LEVEL - OPTION B
rchitects/Erigirieers/Plantrers
LEXINGTON
RESCUE DEPARTMENT
CECEICERVA
UPPER LEVEL - OPTION B
rehitects/Engineers/Hanners
Option B — Advantages
• Fulfills all of the programmatic needs.
• Construction is not phased.
• Layout is operational efficient.
• Space is allocated for future expansion.
Option B Disadvantages
• Demolition of the existing station..
• Fire Department needs to relocate during the construction.
• More expensive than new renoVatiOnleXp,ansion..
• Will require the realignment of Camellia:Plate,
chime
/Engine r3/Planners
GROUND LEVEL - OPTION C
tritecls/Engin
a
es/Planners
EOM
,,x,01
0 Off MMOUVRO111
Qaramial
0 umocurras
❑PSC
El
MiEVEL
UPPER-LEVEL OPTION C
rctritectslErigitieers/Planfrets
Option C Advantages
• Construction cost.
• Solves the Fire Departments immediate needs for
structural repairs to the apparatus bay.
Option C — Disadvantages.
• Does not resolve the Departments long term issues, or the
immediate need for additional administrative spaces and
apparatus storage space.
• Station programmatic needs are not addressed.
• Will require the Fire Department to relocate during the
construction.
• Second floor means of egress are not addressed.
• Construction costs. Delay in construction will eventually
increase the construction costs.
Architects/Engineers/Planners
Variablce t1p0an A`
id�lvfroNRrnat«
!KolkingSquare Footage
Now Coainictlbn o.£
aExbsting Building Renovation n.t
Existing Apparatus Ray s.P.
oml Square Footage
building demolition (Existing Station)
aiming building selectivedemolltion(Ex(sting The Simian Hay)
onnfraction Cats
Building Canntruclwn Costs
lug Building Rrumution Cosis
olition Costs
sbeMos Abattinent
olcciivcDemolition
'osmic Upgrades to Existing Building
stural Appnmtus Bay Remtwat and Rapiaoemenl
Preminum
Relocation Caw (allowance)
on stnwCIimt Conlingencies
ion
Project Manager
Furniloro And Equipment Allowance
'omtnuNntlon Technologies AUownntc
ddil onai Project Cots06st1ng.s97ey, geet.eb, ne.)
Road Cats
En %I Iuau
struction Escalade* to end u52009
Su6.Tatal
Sub.Tolai
Sub -Total
SO -Tonal
82.272
8.299
,270
20.571 22,2061
11165,
1,680
$ 300.00 $ 3,681,600 S 6461.800 S
S 180.00 S 1,493,820 S $ 1,151,100
5 20,00 5 S 233,300 5
$ 78,000 $ 78,000 8 78,000
1 30.00 8 50,400 $ $
1 10.00 $ 82,990 $ 15
$ 850,000
$ 5986,110 3 6973,100 1 2,070,100
675 5 327,209 $ $
1 100,000 $ 300,000 $ 300.090
5 5910,019 1 7273,800 5 2,00
10°.5 i 581.002 S 727,310 $ 277379.1,910
5 6,791,030 5 8,000,410 5 2,617,010
8% $ 464,801 $ $ 381948 $ 190228
i
4Sfi' $
'_35,611 120,016 $ 104.680
15 60,000 $60,000 $ 60,000
I
5 25.000 $ 35,tl00 I S 25.000
4.0°A } 5 273.041 S 320.016 $ 104.680
0.434 $ 21,164 $ 32,002 S 10,468
i
7111)11312THD
7,477168 S 9,339392 5 3.112,167
747,767 S 933.929 S 311,217
8.225.434 5 10373,232 $ 3,113.3841'
If
8.759 S 6_600
ers/planners
Questions?