HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-02-26-HATS-min Hanscom Area Towns Committee (HATS)
DRAFT MEETING MINUTES
February 26, 2015
HATS Members. Peter Braun, HATS Chair and Lincoln Selectmen, Carmin
Reiss, Concord Selectmen, Michael Rosenberg, Bedford Selectmen, Joseph
Pato, Lexington Selectmen
Other HATS Representatives: John Wilson, Bedford Conservation Commission
Chair, Margaret Coppe, Lexington; Maggie Debbie, Bedford, Dee Ortner,
Concord, Robert Domnitz and Chris Reilly, Lincoln Planning Board member and
staff.
Others in attendance. MassPort. Amber Goodspeed, Ed Freni, Jose Masso,
Sharon Williams, Tom Glynn, Nancy Donohue, Jennifer Meltzer, Kati Winchell
and Anna Winter, Save Our Heritage; Nancy Nelson, Minute Man National
Park; Carrie Rankin, Rep Moulton's office; Gary Davis, Lincoln; Anthony
Moreschi and Wade Blackman, Rep Clark's office; Scott Sheehan, HAFB; Mark
Siegenthaler, Bedford Selectmen, Jim Henderson, Lincoln, Judy Stein, Lincoln;
Robert Grom, Concord; Jane Herlacher, Lincoln; Kate Moore, Sen. Warren's
office
Mr. Braun opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m. with welcome and introductions at
the Lincoln Town Offices, stating it was an honor to have the CEO of MassPort in
attendance to give a presentation. Mr. Braun briefly reviewed Mr. Glynn's
impressive background before he became head of MassPort about two years
ago. Mr. Braun also focused on the reference in Mr. Glynn's on-line biography on
enhancing community relations Mr Braun said that HATS appreciates Mr.
Glynn's willingness to engage in open dialogue with HATS.
MassPort/Air Field - Presentation By MassPort CEO, Tom Glynn, and Other
Staff:
Mr Glynn introduced his staff and thanked HATS for arranging the discussion
this evening He also acknowledged the great work done on behalf of the towns
at the state and federal level by our legislative representatives. He then gave an
overview of MassPort.
MassPort is a $600M agency with 17,000 employees at Logan alone. There
exist other maritime facilities of MassPort that are not directly associated with the
airports that impact the local economy, including infrastructure for importing car
parts and processing seafood. The Mystic River (Tobin) Bridge used to bring in
$30M in revenue and had $15M in expenses but was moved to Mass DOT and,
therefore, has negatively impacted their financial portfolio. They also have a
significant real estate development responsibility/presence in the Seaport area.
Mr. Glynn said that one of his first tasks as CEO was to produce a strategic plan
for all of MassPort's divisions, including aviation, maritime infrastructure, and real
estate. It took two years for them to review and consider all the lines of business
and how they relate to the economy, following which they have been reviewing
the plan with State and federal legislative representatives.
Significant new development at Logan is not currently planned, since Logan has
successfully implemented several major efforts during recent years. For example,
they have been successful in increasing the variety and number of their
International flights. The biggest issue at Logan is parking; there are 17,000
parking spaces, but typically they need over 19,000, even though they have a
large scale valet system and offer free parking at Suffolk Downs. MassPort is
working toward creating an additional 2,000 space parking facility. $4.5B was
already spent redeveloping and building the roadways at Logan.
Initially, MassPort was created to preserve the maritime and working port of
Boston. They now have a commitment from the Federal government to match
spending of $300M for dredging the harbor to further the ability to meet the
needs though the maritime businesses Most of the ships coming into the
container terminal accommodate up to 7,000 containers With the widening of
the Panama Canal there could be the need to accommodate ships with up to
18,000 containers, but the Boston Harbor is not currently deep or wide
enough. There may also be expenditures up to $500M for land development to
accommodate these larger ships There is great enthusiasm about this, including
the creation of blue collar jobs and real estate development of the area.
They were given ownership of the Worcester airport (2nd biggest city in New
England), and have already spent $100m to make it a first class airport, which
could generate $150M of economic activity. JetBlue appears to be succeeding at
Worcester, and other airlines are expressing interest to operate there.
There are no mission changes or expansions planned for Hanscom Air Field,
including no plans to accommodate cargo or scheduled airlines. There are plans
to modernize the existing facilities. Mr. Glynn also confirmed that one benefit of
upgrading the existing FBO facilities would be to decrease some of the corporate
jet usage Today, some jets can only drop off or pick up their passengers at
Hanscom, but have to fly to other airports for overnight stays or service, thus
adding flights in and out of Hanscom. These extra flights could be eliminated
when Hanscom's facilities are upgraded to permit appropriate overnight and
service capabilities.
Mr. Glynn also commented about the accident that occurred about a year ago,
when a Gulfstream 4 crashed during an attempted takeoff and seven people
were killed. He first thanked the local area towns, municipal officials, and
departments that worked closely with MassPort to assist when this accident
happened NTSB is in charge of the investigation and has released some
information. One issue is determining how the plane could have been going 190
mph without the ability to lift. One possibility is the gust lock mechanism
appeared to be locked into place despite the plane's speed; a possible
consequence if the takeoff process is not followed in a particular order. A letter
was generated reminding pilots of the ordering of steps in this process along with
a reminder of the checklist they are supposed to follow. The docket of
data/evidence found will be released within the next 3 months (roughly a year
from the accident)
Mr. Braun mentioned the meeting held the day after the accident that included
many public safety staff, and he emphasized the importance of continuing this
level of coordination to anticipate region-wide disaster response
Mr. Glynn also commented briefly on the new MassPort Community Advisory
Committee (CAC). A voluntary organization known as the Logan CAC was
created in the 1970's as an informal group to be watch dog on Logan expansion
and flight path impacts In 2009 and 2013 legislation, a new committee with a
wider focus and broader composition was authorized but never materialized. A
CAC staff will be funded by a MassPort grant ($250,000). The new CAC is now
beginning to establish itself in accordance with the legislative authority it was
provided The four HATS towns have appointed members of the CAC. CAC
activity will include reviewing the MassPort budget and plans and appointing a
member of the MassPort Board.
Mr Rosenberg asked about the strategic plan and whether it will target specific
geographic projects and how town officials and neighbors can learn of potential
modernization plans. Mr. Glynn said the capital budget has to be developed for
specific projects. Typically information is available through MassPort board
meetings with published minutes Projects at Hanscom are also brought to the
HFAC and reviewed in their meetings Mr. Rosenberg said the HFAC is an
important avenue for communication and information flow at a local level.
Ms Reiss asked about ground transportation to and from the Worcester ariport,
since it is the 2nd largest airport after Logan Mr. Glynn said there are about
350-400,000 people flying on typically full flights, and he commented that it is
apparent that people are getting there despite there being no direct road from the
Mass Pike. Residents of the greater Worcester area know how to get to that
airport, and education to the wider population should help. He emphasized that
Worcester is viewed as a reliever of scheduled flights that would otherwise use
Logan, which is already very busy, and that MassPort plans to continue to invest
in growing the Worcester airport for JetBlue and other scheduled airlines.
There was a brief discussion regarding the revenue realized from operations.
Mr. Glynn said the goal is to break even or make a little margin. Hanscom itself
does not break even, but Logan offsets this, they are unsure if Worcester will be
a profit center but with proper investment could very well be as successful as the
investment made in South Boston Ms. Reiss asked if there is an aspect of the
strategic plan directed at improving the profitability of Hanscom, and he said that
there are no such plans at this time. It is working fine and there are other
priorities for remedial efforts.
The strategic plan will be posted on the Massport website when available in
about eight weeks.
The discussion was opened up to audience Mr Domnitz asked about the 1978
Master Plan and if the current plans are consistent with it. Ms. Goodspeed said
there is nothing in the 1978 master plan that conflicts with MassPort's current
vision for Hanscom.
Concord resident Robert Grom, who lives near the airport, reported about recent
noise events that woke him up and confirmed through local staff that a majority of
them were corporate jets. The 2014 report showed this is an area of growth for
MassPort. He inquired about the possibility of curtailing evening flights at
Hanscom Ms Goodspeed said it was in the 1978 master plan to assess a
surcharge for flights between the hours of 11 pm and 7am but this was written
before the 1990 Airport Noise and Capacity Act (ANCA) which made restrictions
more difficult to implement. There was a brief discussion regarding the role of
the FAA in this despite the importance of Hanscom in their structure Residents
were encouraged to attend the HFAC meetings.
Judy Stein, Lincoln resident, asked for an update on the Jet Aviation project. It is
currently is in litigation and under review by the DEP
Concord resident Anna Winter said she realized MassPort is not looking to
expand Hanscom borders but asked if they could meet with the communities to
solidify the footprint and give assurances. She was told that that is the purpose
of these meetings and the meetings often include elected officials
Mr. Braun concluded the discussion and said a video of the meeting is available
for those who want to review the meeting and thanked everyone for attending.
He invited the attendees back when there is more information to share.
Community Advisory Committee — Status Report
The first meeting is scheduled for some time in April, which will be the beginning
of a process to establish its governance, workplan, and staff. There was
discussion about establishing a liaison understanding with the four towns' CAC
representatives, including one or more of them attending a HATS meeting from
time to time, once the CAC establishes itself.
Air Force Base
Task Force/MassDevelopment— Brief Status Report
Ann Marie Dowd provided an email update that Mr Braun
read. MassDevelopment met with Governor Baker, Lt Governor Polito and
Secretary Ash in January to brief them on the activities of the Task Force and
emphasize the need for reengagement HATS will keep this on the spring
agenda Mr Braun reported that he has had dialogue with Mass. High Tech
Council/DTI head, Chris Anderson, regarding his thoughts about the Task Force
and about coming to a HATS meeting soon.
Association of Defense Communities — Membership/Individual Access To
Newsletter
If anyone should be added to the email list, please let Mr. Braun know, so he can
notify ADC
Community Partnership (P-4) Initiatives — Status Reports
There will be another coordinating committee meeting in May. Regulatory
hurdles have been cleared to enable Bedford to provide salt brine. Lincoln and
Concord continue to work with the Base on the potential addition of the Base into
their existing paramedic arrangement.
Regional Transportation and Other Concerns
Rt. 2 Updates (Crosby Corner and 1-95 Bndae Projects)
There is no work going on currently on the Crosby Corner project due to the
severe winter weather. The delay was expected in the overall schedule, and
work is expected to resume in March.
There was a Rt 128 public meeting on Wednesday but no update on the bridge
project.
Feedback From January 22 Roundtable Discussion
Ms. Reiss is a member of the Fiscal Policy Committee for the Mass Municipal
Association. They recently had a presentation from ED of the MBTA Advisory
Board regarding financial status and history, which included discussion of the
possibility of increasing assessments to cities and towns that are part of the
MBTA. Ms. Reiss said that the ED would be willing to come to a HATS
meeting. There was a brief discussion regarding the impact of the lack of
commuter rail service, even on Alewife, as well as planned assessments.
Future Meetings
There was a discussion regarding the HATS schedule as follows:
March — No Meeting
April 23 — Appoint Chair; Ms. Reiss to inquire about MBTA Advisory Board ED
May 21 or June 4 - members to e-mail their preferences.
July 23 — To Be Determined
August - No meeting
Potential topics include Task Force and Governor's Community Compact Cabinet
Minutes — January 22, 2015:
Ms. Reiss addressed two typos, and with those changes Mr. Braun asked for a
motion to approve
Mr. Rosenberg moved to approve.
Ms. Reiss seconded the motion.
There was no discussion on the motion.
Vote: Approved 4-0-0
Mr. Braun will post the minutes on the HATS website.
Mr. Rosenberg will look into including the MNP Superintendent in a future
meeting with staff to update regarding plans for the National Park.
Adjourn
Mr. Pato moved to adjourn. Ms. Reiss seconded the motion. Vote. Approved 4-
0-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:47pm.