Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-06-15-2020-min (Steering Committee) Meeting Minutes – Lexington 2020 Vision Steering Committee Meeting – June 15, 2000 Members Present: Fernando Quezada, Peggy Perry, Todd Burger, Fred Merrill, Peter Enrich, Consultants and Town Staff: Suzanne Orenstein, Richard White, Candy McLaughlin, Monicka Tutschka, Call to Order Approval of May 19 and June 1, 2000 Minutes Update on Work Groups The educational excellence work group has submitted their final report. They are unsure nd about the purpose of the June 22 meeting. They will be receiving an agenda and an invitation in the mail in the next couple of days. Individuals who have email addresses in the database will also be contacted by email and WG chairs will be encouraged to attend. The Managing Transportation Work Group went through the CPG comments and they made minor changes. They have submitted their final report. The Sense of Community Work Group has also completed and submitted their final report. The Managing Growth Group submitted their report and they would like to review and provide input to the integrated final report. The Work Groups have now completed this phase of the process. Whether they will live on or dissolve, and what their roles will be if they live on remains a question. Review June 22 Meeting Logistics Steering Committee members are encouraged to attend the meeting. Work Group chairs will be asked to distribute certificates and they will participate in the question and answer period but they will not be asked to make any formal presentation to the plenum. Extra evaluation forms will be available. The Minuteman will be notified and a Letter to the Editor will be sent before Monday. The working meeting should end as soon as possible so that more time will be available for celebration. Contents of Final Report The executive summary should be no more than 2.5 pages. It should be in Volume 1 and it should be a free-standing document. The executive summary will be widely distributed but it is not the press packet. In Volume 1 there should be found a consolidated Vision for nd the entire process. This Vision should not be watered down. The 2 volume should contain the full text of all 6 work group final reports. Final Report Creation To what extent will the WGs and the CPG want to be involved in the final report process? The consultants will contact the WG chairs for input, if necessary and the WGs will have the opportunity to review the draft final integrated report before it goes out to the public for further review. The final report is not a blue print for action. Its role is to focus debate and discussion within the community. Going Public with the Report A statistical survey will be conducted that checks to see whether the primary goals and objectives found in the final version of the report are accurate.. This survey will be randomly sent to a certain number of individuals in the community. Chronology The draft will be created in JulyAugust. A SC, WG, CPG, public review process of the draft will be conducted. The final report will be finalized and published. A road show to elected boards and committees along with key constituent groups will take place and a survey will be conducted. A community-wide meeting will be held. The Steering Committee will become the Implementation Committee. Upcoming Tasks A media strategy is needed for the final report road show. Open meetings need to be structured. Survey concept needs to be thought through. Renewal of the 2020 Vision process needs to be considered. The Implementation/Strategic Planning Committee needs to be created. They will monitor the implementation of progress of the 2020 Vision report findings. Adjourn