HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-02-28-CEC-minMinutes of the
Lexington Capital Expenditures Committee (CEC) Meeting
February 28, 2017
Location and Time: Town Offices Building, Reed Room (111); 7:30 A.M.
Members Present: Jill Hai, Chair; David Kanter, Vice -Chair & Clerk; Wendy Manz;
Charles Lamb (remote participation)
Member Absent: Rod Cole
Others Present: Carolyn Kosnoff, Assistant Town Manager for Finance; Sandy Beebee,
resident; Elaine Ashton, Town Meeting Member; Sara Arnold, Recording Secretary
Documents Presented:
• Notice of CEC Meeting, February 28, 2017
• Draft #3 Minutes of the CEC meeting, February 14, 2017
CaII to Order: At 7:31 A.M., Ms. Hai called the meeting to order and announced she had
authorized Mr. Lamb to participate remotely as he was not local.
Follow -up discussions regarding FY2017 projects and purchases
Ms. Hai reported on several projects that were discussed at the previous evening's Board
of Selectmen's (BoS) meeting, as follows:
• Annual Town Meeting (ATM) Article 17 (Appropriate for Hastings School
Replacement Design): The BoS selected design elements of.an all- electric design
with geothermal systems and the no- additional -cost options that would result in the
indoor CO2 levels being reduced to an estimated 720 -810 parts per million (ppm).
BoS did not support elements that would have projected a further- reduced the CO2
level, but which had both cost impacts and some non - cognitive health risks; a
humidifying system for the whole building; or elements that would have enhanced
resilience for extreme events of up to 5 days— creating an emergency evacuation
center as a back up to Lexington High School.
• Special Town Meeting (STM) Article 4 (Appropriate Design Funds for Lexington
Children's Place (LCP) /20 Pelham Road): The recently released FY2018
Recommended Budget and Financing Plan ( "Brown Book ") identifies using $771,000
for designs of the LCP and space for municipal uses (e.g., by the Lexington
Community Center (LexCC)), but the Town Warrant only identifies the funds being
used for the LCP. To align with the Warrant, the STM funding request is being
reduced by approximately $190,000. Increases in the funding under for ATM
Article 16(e) (Public Facilities Bid Documents) —which scope does allow funding to
be used for both school and municipal purposes —will be requested to support
designing the municipal portion of the building. Mr. Kanter advised he found the
nonbinding language traditionally used in the Brown Book to describe Article 16(e)
indicated that it was for school facilities. That is being reviewed by Town staff.
Ms. Hai reported that the School Committee suggested apportioning all elements of
the 20 Pelham Road building renovations, such as the heating, ventilation, and air -
conditioning systems, the roof, and site abatement to the two different purposes.
This Committee disagreed and said doing so is not advisable as those costs, in their
entirety, are essential for the LCP —which is the first and primary use for which the
land was purchased —and, thus, should remain allocated to the LCP project.
Page 1 of 3
Minutes of the Lexington Capital Expenditures Committee (CEC) Meeting
February 28, 2017
Ms. Hai also reported that the presentation on the items being considered for a fall
debt - exclusion represented presenting one question for the two parts of the project
at the Pelham Road site. This Committee noted that if such a referendum question
fails, both elements lose the exemption. This Committee expressed concern about
"mission creep" as adding the build -out for municipal uses, while an additional,
contemplated use, changes the renovation plans and adds an estimated $6.1 million
to the $18.3 million already estimated for the build -out to provide just the LCP.
Mr. Kanter suggested that this Committee's report include ATM Article 21 (Appropriate to
Post Employment Insurance Liability Fund). Although it is not directly a capital project, most
of the funding request is from sources that might better be appropriated to the Capital
Stabilization Fund to help mitigate the expense to the tax payers for the very expensive
capital projects planned for new /renovated facilities. A Motion was made and seconded to
include ATM Article 21 in this Committee's report to the ATM, for the purpose of expressing
this Committee's concerns over the allocation of available funding. A roll -call vote was
taken. Vote: 4 -0
Ms. Manz reported that, to respond to an earlier question by a member, she had received
an explanation regarding the use of the Community Preservation Committee's
administrative budget. She plans to prepare an explanatory table demonstrating the
expenditures.
Ms. Hai reported that recently implemented methods for extending the life of roadways
have positively influenced the curves associated with roadway pavement -index changes.
Committee's Report to the 2017 ATM and Special Town Meeting (STM) 2017 -1
Ms. Hai discussed the Executive Summary. She plans to create a project priority list and to
discuss a range of important projects for the Town from addressing school - enrollment
increases, to upgrading public- safety facilities, to purchasing new voting equipment. It was
noted that this Committee does not perceive the planned spending as wasteful, but at some
point the voters may object to the debt - exclusion requests. Quality of service is important to
residents, but it can be expected that the taxes required to meet expectations could change
the Town's demographics.
Mr. Kanter identified sections of the report that require additional information and who is
responsible for those sections. It was agreed quoting the State statute on the membership
of the Community Preservation Committee would be included in the report.
The goal is to approve the report at this Committee's March 7th meeting, with a back -up
meeting on March 10th, both at 7:30 A.M. It is hoped the meeting on March 10th would be
primarily to capture votes from members who had not attended the March 7th meeting and it
is assumed the meeting on the 10th would be over by 8:00 A.M. when the BoS is meeting to
receive a report on the Police Headquarters location study— thereby allowing those
Committee members to attend the BoS meeting if they wish to do so.
Approval of Minutes
A Motion was made and seconded to approve the Draft #3 Minutes of the CEC meeting,
February 14, 2017, as amended. A roll -call vote was taken. Vote: 4-0
Next Meeting
Recommendations should be brought to this Committee's March 7th meeting for
Articles /sub - Articles the Committee should propose to the Town Moderator for
consideration to be included in a Consent Agenda at the 2017 ATM.
Page 2 of 3
Minutes of the Lexington Capital Expenditures Committee (CEC) Meeting
February 28, 2017
Adjourn: A Motion was made and seconded at 9:03 A.M. to adjourn. A roll -call vote was
taken. Vote: 4-0
These Minutes were approved by the CEC at its meeting on March 7, 2017.
Page 3 of 3