Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-03-28-ATM-STM1-STM2-min March 28,2022 Annual Town Meeting The 2022 Annual Town Meeting was held remotely as voted by order of the Select Board and request of the Moderator.The meeting was held remotely using a virtual platform that was developed by Select Board member Joseph Pato.Electronic voting was conducted via the platform and results were reported on the Town's website as per usual practice. Moderator Deborah Brown called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.and noted that a staff help line was available for anyone experiencing technical difficulties. 7:32 p.m. The Moderator called attention to the Voting Portal and asked members to practice raising an objection in order to understand the process and noted that she would only use the feature for procedural matters,such as receiving reports. As some voters pressed the "point of order"button,the Moderator double checked with each person to ensure that this was done in error. 7:34 p.m. David Kanter,Pct. 7,stated that he had experienced a connection delay when using the requested action. The Moderator directed the issue to Joseph Pato,who asked him to manually refresh the page to solve the problem. 7:35 p.m. Town Clerk,Mary de Alderete,read the Warrant for the Annual Town Meeting until waived.The Town Clerk then read the Constable's Return of Service. 7:36 p.m. The Moderator welcomed all Town Meeting Members as well as members of Town and school staff,board and committees,along with residents and other visitors watching on cable tv or livestreaming on LexMedia.org. 7:38 p.m. The Moderator called for Town Meeting Members to register their attendance. At the conclusion of this procedure,she stated that a quorum had been reached(177). 7:48 p.m. The Moderator then gave an overview of parliamentary procedures and upon completion,called for a vote to approve the use of remote technology for 2022 March Annual Town Meeting and Special Town Meeting#1. 7:49 pm. Ms.Hai, Select Board Chair,moved that the Town Meeting Members approve the use of Remote Technology during the Meetings. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Approve use of Remote Technology for the Annual and Special Town Meetings Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 177 3 1 MOTION CARRIES 7:54 p.m. The Moderator called the Meeting open under Article 2. ARTICLE 2 ELECTION OF DEPUTY MODERATOR AND REPORTS OF TOWN BOARDS,OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES a. Deputy Moderator MOTION:Ms.Hai moves that Barry Orenstein be approved as Deputy Moderator. 7:55 p.m. The Moderator noted that unless there were objections,she would consider this a voice vote. As there were no objections the motion unanimously carries. 7:56 p.m. The Moderator declared that Annual Town Meeting to be in recess. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. March 28,2022 Special Town Meeting 01 (2022-1) Moderator Deborah Brown called the Special Town Meeting#1 to order at 7:56 p.m.,Monday, March 28,2022. The 2022 Special Town Meeting#1 was held remotely as voted by order of the Select Board and request of the Moderator.The meeting was held remotely using a virtual platform that was developed by Select Board member Joseph Pato.Electronic voting was conducted via the platform and results were reported on the Town's website as per usual practice. 7:58 p.m. Town Clerk,Mary de Alderete,read the Warrant for Special Town Meeting#1 until waived. The Town Clerk then read the Constable's Return of Service. The Moderator declared the Meeting open under Article 1. ARTICLE 1 REPORTS OF TOWN BOARDS,OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES a. Report of the Town Manager MOTION: Ms.Hai moves that the report of the Town Manager be received and placed on file. As there were no objections,the Report was accepted. 7:58 p.m. The Moderator recognized James Malloy,Town Manager,for the presentation as there were no objections. Mr.Malloy welcomed new staff members Abby McCabe,Planning Director,Maggie Peard, Sustainability&Resilience Officer,and Eloise Laurence, Sustainability Intern from Lexington's sister city in Antony,France. Mr.Malloy then presented information regarding long term financial planning and the capitalization stabilization framework with regard to the expected tax bill increase and debt service projections. 8:09 P.M. The Moderator thanked Mr.Malloy for his presentation and asked for a Motion from the Appropriations Committee regarding their 2022-1 Special Town Meeting report and noted that the consolidated report of the Appropriation Committee contained information for both the Annual and Special Town Meetings. b. Reports of the Appropriation Committee MOTION: Mr.Parker moves that the reports of the Appropriation Committee be received and placed on file. As there were no objections,Report was accepted. 8:10 P.M. The Moderator asked for a Motion from the Capital Expenditures Committee regarding their 2022-1 Special Town Meeting report and noted that the consolidated report of the Capital Expenditures Committee contained information for both the Annual and Special Town Meetings. C. Reports of the Capital Expenditures Committee MOTION: Mr.Lamb moves that the reports of the Capital Expenditures Committee be received and placed on file. As there were no objections,Report was accepted. 8:12 p.m. The Moderator declared the Meeting open under Article 2. The Moderator asked whether Suzanne Barry, Select Board Member had a note of recusal on the next Article. Ms.Barry noted that after consultation with Counsel,a recusal was unnecessary. ARTICLE 2-APPROPRIATE FOR 1575 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE/POLICE STATION REPLACEMENT MOTION: Ms.Hai moves that$32,400,000 be appropriated for design and construction of a new Police Station,located at 1575 Massachusetts Avenue,including the costs of demolition,architectural and engineering services, original equipment, furnishings, landscaping, paving, and other site and March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. traffic improvements incidental or related to such construction,and that to meet this appropriation the Treasurer, with the approval of the Board of Selectmen, is authorized to borrow $32,400,000 under M.G.L.Chapter 44,Section 7,or any other enabling authority,provided that no sums shall be borrowed or expended pursuant to this vote unless the Town shall have voted to exclude the amounts needed to repay any borrowing pursuant to this vote from the limitations on the property tax levy imposed by M.G.L. Chapter 59,Section 21C(otherwise known as Proposition 2'/2). 8:13 p.m. Jeffery McElravy,Principal with Tecton Architects,gave a presentation showing a design overview of the planned new Police Station,including explaining the layout and features,as well as the proposed exterior and parking lot. He also explained the proposed timeline for construction. 8:33 p.m. Jill Hai, Select Board Chair,gave an overview of the history of the Article and noted the unanimous support of the Select Board for approval of the Article. 8:36 p.m. Charles Lamb,Capital Expenditures Committee Chair,stated the unanimous support of the Capital Expenditures Committee. 8:37 p.m. Eric Michelson,Member of the Appropriations Committee,stated that the Appropriations Committee had voted 8-0 for approval of the Article. Todd Rhodes,Vice-Chair of the Sustainable Lexington Committee,stated that the Sustainable Lexington Committee supported the Article. 8:39 p.m. The Moderator then opened the floor for questions and debate. Victoria Buckley,Pct. 8 noted that when taking a virtual tour,the path did not seem to go to the accessible area of the parking lot,and asked whether the correction indicated by the Commission on Disability had been upheld. Mr.McElravy stated that on the site plan there was a pathway in a direct line to accessible parking,and they had cut through where planter beds had originally been drawn in order to do so. 8:41 p.m. Mark Andersen,Pct.9 questioned the position of the large steel encasement shown on the plans and worried about its height. Michael Cronin,Director of Public Facilities,stated that the drawing of the antennae was just a representation and was not a part of this particular project,and although an actual location had not been chosen as they were looking at multiple choices,this was an option. Mr.Andersen asked why it hadn't been included in the project. James Malloy,Town Manager,said that they had been working with AT&T for approximately five years and that the company would be installing the antennae,but allowing public safety and public works to use it. 8:44 p.m. Tom Shiple,Pct.9,asked how the space for social services would be used and evolve in Police Department operations. Chief McLean noted that the public had been clear on the importance of embedded social services and that while they did not have specific plans as of yet,the fact that the space was flexible was helpful to move forward and they would seek input from the subject matter experts and partners as to what would work best for the department and community. Mr. Shiple noted that he planned to support the Article. 8:45 p.m. Jay Luker,Pct. 1,stated that according to the FAQs,the design stated that it would accommodate the current 72 officers,and there was space for anticipated growth. He asked if there was an expected percentage forecasted. Chief McLean said that there were currently 72 full-time employees,and that was mix of police and civilians. He stated that the growth could come from many places,but that the new locker room could easily handle 12 more people,and the walls could be moved to accommodate them,and in the near future any expansion wouldn't be an issue. Mr.Luker asked whether the size of the current station was a constraint on the number of officers that could be employed. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Chief McLean said that it was an obvious benefit to have space for any growth they experienced and that for the time he was with the Town,the current size of the building had been an issue in allowing efficient procedures. 8:47 p.m. Bridger McGaw,Pct. 6,said that he rose in support of the appropriation and was excited that they had this opportunity to bring about a modernization in a new building and commended the staff on their ability to have full accreditation from the Massachusetts Police Accreditation Commission and the high level of professionalism it required in the current situation. 8:50 p.m. Tanya Gisolfi-McReady,Pct. 1,said that while she supported non-gender locker rooms, she had spoken to some female officers and they wished to have a separate area to dress in. She asked whether this would be part of the plan. Chief McLean said that it would be part of the plan to offer single and non-gender locker rooms Ms.Gisolfi-McReady asked whether the new space would allow flexibility in use. Mr.McFlravy stated that the building was flexible due to non-load bearing walls,which meant they could be moved,so they could always rearrange the floor plan. Ms.Gisolfi-McReady stated that she was excited about the possibility of holding trainings there in the future. 8:55 p.m. Steven Heinrich,Pct.3,said that he was concerned regarding the requested amount,and yet they did not have a plan for the Hosmer House. He asked how this would be handled as the police station required a debt exclusion. James Malloy,Town Manager,stated that they had an RFP out to sell the Hosmer House and had a resident who was looking for permitting for a particular parcel of land with a planned closing of April 19''. He noted that they were also in conversations with the Historic Districts Commission and the potential of moving it to a different part of Fletcher Park that would also serve as a sort of visual buffer for a possible solar array in the Park.He stated that this would be their fallback position if they were unable to sell it with the RFP. Mr.Heinrich stated that he hoped a conclusion could be reached before the June 8I'debt exclusion vote. He said that he felt that the vote would not be a simple task at this time, with the possible renovation of the high school coming. He said that many were concerned about taxes and upcoming expenses,so having Hosmer House decided would be helpful. 8:56 p.m. Robert Cohen,Pct.4,asked for clarification on the pole cost—whether the Town or AT&T would be providing the funds. Mr.Malloy stated that there was no fee associated to the Town as AT&T would be installing it,and they would be receiving rental revenue from others that used the service. 8:59 p.m. Delanot Bastien,Pct.3,noted that he was concerned with world events and supply chain issues,and wondered how they could be sure the cost of the project wouldn't cost more. Mr.Malloy stated that they had budgeted for cost escalation for when they go into construction using current inflation modules,and that is why initial estimates had gone up. 9:02 p.m. Jill Hai,Select Board Chair,noted a point of clarification that some people had stated a June 8h date as a a potential date for the debt exclusion vote,but that it hadn't been decided by the Select Board yet,and that,when decided,it would also not be on the 8' as that was a Wednesday and usual voting took place on Mondays. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 9:03 p.m. The Moderator opened the voting portal on Article 2. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 2—Appropriate for 1575 Massachusetts Avenue/Police Station Replacement Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 174 1 6 MOTION CARRIES WITH MORE THAN NECESSARY 2/3RDS 9:07 p.m. The Moderator declared the Meeting open under Article 3. ARTICLE 3 AUTHORIZE AND RATIFY REMOTE TOWN MEETINGS MOTION: Mr. Lucerne moves that this article be indefinitely postponed. Mr. Lucerne explained that the Select Board unanimously recommended indefinite postponement as this matter was handled by State legislation. 9:08 p.m. Robert Avallone,Pct. 8,noted that last he had heard the State hadn't passed the legislation The Moderator explained that it was part of the supplemental budget signed both chambers and signed by the Governor,and extends the ability to hold remote meetings until July 15th. 9:09 p.m. The Moderator opened the voting portal on Article 3. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 3—That this Article be Indefinitely Postponed Is Indefinitely Postponed Yes No Abstain 179 0 5 MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIES 9:11 p.m. David Kanter,Pct. 7,raised a Point of Order regarding the text on the screen for the Article as he was looking for the words"indefinitely postpone". The Moderator noted that they usually just showed the Article. Mr.Kanter withdrew his comment. 9:12 p.m. Jill Hai,Select Board Chair moved to dissolve Special Town Meeting 2022-1.As there were no objections,motion unanimously carries. 9:13 p.m. Moderator Deborah Brown called the March 28,2022 Annual Town Meeting back to order. The Moderator declared the Meeting open under Article 2. The Moderator asked for a Motion from the Appropriations Committee regarding their 2022-1 Annual Town Meeting report and noted that the consolidated report of the Appropriation Committee contained information for both the Annual and Special Town Meetings. e.Reports of the Appropriation Committee MOTION:Mr.Parker moves that the reports of the Appropriation Committee be received and placed on file. As there were no objections,Report was accepted. The Moderator asked for a Motion from the Capital Expenditures Committee regarding their 2022-1 Annual Town Meeting report and noted that the consolidated report of the Appropriation Committee contained information for both the Annual and Special Town Meetings. f.Reports of the Capital Expenditures Committee MOTION:Mr.Lamb moves that the reports of the Capital Expenditures Committee be received and placed on file.As there were no objections,Report was accepted. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. The Moderator asked for a Motion to receive the report of the Town Manager. c.Report of the Town Manager MOTION:Ms.Hai moves that the report of the Town Manager be received and placed on file.As there were no objections,Report was accepted. 9:14 p.m. James Malloy,Town Manager,gave a presentation on the FY23 recommended budget and finance plan for the Town. The Moderator asked for a Motion to receive the report of the Committee on Cary Lectures. b. Report of the Committee on Cary Lectures. MOTION:Ms.Goldberg moves that the report of the Committee on Cary Lectures be received and placed on file and the Committee discharged. 9:25 p.m. Ms.Rita Goldberg thanked the Trustees and staff and gave a presentation of the Committee's past and planned lectures. 9:30p.m. The Moderator declared the Meeting open under Article 3. ARTICLE 3 APPOINTMENTS TO CARY LECTURE SERIES MOTION:Ms.Hai moves that the Moderator appoint a committee of four to have the charge of the lectures under the wills of Eliza Cary Farnham and Suzanna E. Cary for the current year. Ms.Hai noted the unanimous support of the Select Board for the Article. 9:31 p.m. As there were no questions,the Moderator opened the voting portal on Article 3. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 3—Appointments to Cary Lecture Series Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 179 1 1 MOTION CARRIES 9:35 p.m. The Moderator asked for a procedural motion to take up Articles 5 and 9. Ms.Hai moved to take up Articles 5 and 9. As there was no objection,the Moderator declared the Meeting was open under Article 5. ARTICLE 5 APPROPRIATE FY2023 ENTERPRISE FUNDS BUDGETS MOTION: Mr. Sandeen moves: a) That the Town appropriate the following sums of money to operate the Water Division of the Department of Public Works during fiscal year 2023 under the provisions of M.G.L.Chapter 44, Section 53F'/2: Personal Services $875,670 Expenses $533,500 Debt Service $1,224,746 MWRA Assessment $8,493,467 Total $11,127,383 Said sums to be funded from water receipts. b) That the Town appropriate the following sums of money to operate the Wastewater(Sewer) Division of the Department of Public Works during fiscal year 2023 under the provisions of M.G.L. Chapter 44, Section 53F'/z: March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Personal Services $399,848 Expenses $458,400 Debt Service $1,595,417 MWRA Assessment $8,499,573 Total $10,953,238 Said sums to be funded from wastewater receipts. c) That the Town appropriate the following sums of money to operate the Recreation and Community Programs Department during fiscal year 2023 under the provisions of M.G.L. Chapter 44, Section 53F'/z: Personal Services $1,567,753 Expenses $1,571,240 Total $3,138,993 Said sums to be funded from recreation receipts,except that$242,790 shall be raised in the tax levy. 9:37 p.m. Mark Sandeen, Select Board Member,noted the unanimous support of the Select Board for passage of Article 5. John Bartenstein,Member of the Appropriations Committee,stated the unanimous support of the Appropriations Committee. 9:38 p.m. As there were no questions,the Moderator opened the voting portal on Article 5. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 5—Appropriate FY2023 Enterprise Funds Budgets Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 179 0 3 MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIES 9:42 p.m. The Moderator declared the Meeting open under Article 9. ARTICLE 9 ESTABLISH AND CONTINUE DEPARTMENTAL REVOLVINGFUNDS MOTION:Mr.Lucente moves that the Town authorize the following revolving fund limits for certain Town departments pursuant to the provisions of M.G.L. Chapter 44, Section 53E'/2,and Chapter 110 of the Code of the Town of Lexington,for Fiscal Year 2023 beginning July 1,2022,as follows: FUNDS REQUESTED: Program or Purpose for Revolving Funds FY2023 Authorization School Bus Transportation $1,150,000 Building Rental Revolving Fund $586,000 Regional Cache-Hartwell Avenue $50,000 Lexington Tree Fund $75,000 DPW Burial Containers $60,000 DPW Compost Operations $867,000 Minuteman Household Hazardous Waste Program $260,000 Senior Services Program $75,000 Residential Engineering Review $57,600 Health Programs $45,000 Lab Animal Permit Applications/Inspections $40,000 Tourism/Liberty Ride $104,000 Visitors Center $260,000 9:43 p.m. Doug Lucerne, Select Board Member,noted the Select Board was unanimous in support of the Article. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Glenn Parker,Appropriations Committee Chair,stated the unanimous support of the Article. Kathleen Lenihan, School Committee Chair,said that the School Committee was unanimous in their support of the school bus portion of the Article. 9:44 p.m. The Moderator opened the meeting for questions and debate. Dawn McKenna,Pct. 6,stated that she was asking questions on behalf of herself,and not the Tourism Committee. She asked why the Liberty Ride budget had been reduced to half of what it had been in the past as the requests for rides seemed to be going up. Carolyn Kosnoff,Assistant Town Manager for Finance,stated that the Liberty Ride had been shutdown for a while due to the pandemic,so they were not bringing in the usual revenue,and due to that,they had to reduce the budget to match the expected revenue. Ms.McKenna said that they were not budget setting,just setting an upper limit and wondered how they would address a greater demand for services. Ms.Kosnoff noted that as this was a revolving fund,the Select Board could increase the limit during a Select Board meeting,so if the operations increased,they could ask for a larger spending budget. Ms.McKenna asked if all other revolving funds on the list were held to the same standard. Ms.Kosnoff said that they were all held at the same standard,but that some groups had a cushion and that the Liberty Ride program had a negative fund balance. 9:49 p.m. Moderator opened the voting portal on Article 9. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 9—Departmental Revolving Funds Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 178 1 5 MOTION CARRIES 9:52 p.m. After the voting process,the Moderator gave a brief overview of the upcoming Articles planned for the next session and directed the Meeting Members to look carefully at the Consent Agenda before it was brought to the Meeting. 9:54 p.m. Ms.Jill Hai, Select Board Chair,Motioned to Adjourn the Annual Town Meeting to 7:30 p.m.on Wednesday,March 30,2022,such meeting to be held remotely. As there were no objections,the Moderator declared that Motion adopted and the Meeting adjourned. March 30,2022 Adiourned Session of the 2022 Annual Town Meeting Moderator Deborah Brown called the second session of 2022 Annual Town Meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.on Wednesday,March 30,2022.The meeting was held remotely as voted by order of the Select Board and request of the Moderator 7:31 p.m. The Moderator asked that all Members log in their attendance. She then stated that she would keep the module open while making announcements,and that a quorum had been achieved. She reminded Meeting Members that there was a line for tech support and explained the location of the comments section on the website for members of the public to use. 7:35 p.m. The Moderator declared a recess in the Meeting. She then recognized Vineeta Kumar, Chair of the Town Meeting Members Association to give awards for those Meeting Members achieving 30 or 50 years. Ms.Kumar noted that every year it was the Town Meeting Member Association Chair's honor to recognize those Members who had been active for 30 and 50 years. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Ms.Kumar stated that achieving this status involved intrinsic motivation and active participation. She noted that this required the willingness to dedicate decades of one's life to the community,demonstrated commitment of the highest magnitude,and was incredibly inspiring. Ms.Kumar then recognized Jim Osten for his outstanding service of 30 years,and Al Zabin for his remarkable 50 years as a Town Meeting Member. Ms.Kumar then presented both Members with certificates and a Lexington Town Seal pin and thanked them for their outstanding dedication. 7:38 p.m. The Moderator thanked Ms.Kumar and congratulated Mr.Osten and Mr.Zabin and noted that this was an incredible amount of service,and that the Town was fortunate that they had dedicated that time to Lexington,and continued to do so. 7:38 p.m. The Moderator declared the Meeting resumed,and open under Article 2 The Moderator asked for a Motion to receive the report of the Select Board. g.Report of the Select Board MOTION:Ms.Hai moves that the report of the Select Board be received and placed on file. As there were no objections,Report was accepted. 7:42 p.m. The Moderator asked for a Motion to receive the report of the Lexington Public School Superintendent. d.Report of the Superintendent of Schools MOTION:Ms.Lenihan moves that the report of the Superintendent of Schools be received and placed on file. As there were no objections,Report was accepted. 7:42 p.m. A presentation was shown regarding the Superintendent's budget information. 8:01 P.M. The Moderator asked for a Motion to receive the report of the Minuteman Regional Technical High School Superintendent. i.Reports of the Superintendent of Minuteman Regional Technical High School MOTION:Ms. Crocker moves that the reports of the Superintendent of Schools be received and placed on file. As there were no objections,Report was accepted. Dr. Ed Boquillion gave a presentation on the FY23 budget and noted it was his last year as he would be retiring. 8:09 P.M. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 4. ARTICLE 4:APPROPRIATE FY2023 OPERATING BUDGET MOTION: Ms.Hai moves that the following amounts be appropriated for the ensuing fiscal year and raised in the tax levy or from general revenues of the Town,except where a transfer or other source is indicated,they shall be provided by such transfer or other source. Program 1000:Education Personal Services $ 106,450,152 Expenses $ 21,804295 Total Line Item 1100,Lexington Public Schools $ 128,254,447 1200 Regional Schools $ 3,223,898 Program 2000: Shared Expenses 2110 Contributory Retirement $ 8,159,250 2120 Non-Contributory Retirement $ 16,777 2130 Employee Benefits(Health/Dental/Life/Medicare) $ 32,743,388 2140 Unemployment $ 200,000 2150 Workers'Comp.(MGL Ch.40, Sec. 13A&13C,Ch.41, Sec. I I IF)* $ 625,000 2210 Property&Liability Insurance $ 895,000 March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 2220 Uninsured Losses(MGL Ch.40, Sec. 13)* $ 200,000 2310 Solar Producer Payments $ 390,000 2400 Debt Service 2410 Payment on Funded Debt $ 5,274,000 2420 Interest on Funded Debt $ 1,217,534 2430 Temporary Borrowing $ 1,050,046 2510 Reserve Fund $ 750,000 2600 Facilities $ 12,669,307 Program 3000:Public Works 3100-3500 DPW Personal Services $ 4,877,999 3100-3500 DPW Expenses $ 7,090,146 Program 4000:Public Safety 4100 Law Enforcement Personal Services $ 7,169,307 4100 Law Enforcement Expenses $ 1,096,070 4200 Fire Personal Services $ 7,269,665 4200 Fire Expenses $ 798,803 Program 5000: Culture&Recreation 5100 Library Personal Services $ 2,637,708 5100 Library Expenses $ 698,511 Program 6000:Human Services 6000 Human Services Personal Services $ 717,650 6000 Human Services Expenses $ 809,771 Program 7000: Land Use,Health and Development 7100-7400 Land Use,Health and Development Personal Services $ 2,338,226 7100-7400 Land Use,Health and Development Expenses $ 454,387 Program 8000:General Government 8110 Select Board Personal Services $ 145,163 8110 Select Board Expenses $ 134,838 8120 Legal $ 395,000 8130 Town Report $ 13,688 8140 PEG $ 610,113 8210-8220 Town Manager Personal Services $ 956,568 8210-8220 Town Manager Expenses $ 289,185 8230 Salary Transfer Account(MGL Ch.40,Sec 13D)* $ 826,422 and further that Line 8230 is to be transferred by the Select Board for contractual settlements within departments upon recommendation of the Town Manager 8310 Financial Committees $ 8,397 8320 Misc.Boards and Committees $ 10,500 8330 Town Celebrations Committee $ 51,263 8400 Finance Personal Services $ 1.549.316 March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 8400 Finance Expenses $ 498,835 8500 Town Clerk Personal Services $ 470,247 8500 Town Clerk Expenses $ 157,050 8600 Innovation&Technology Personal Services $ 867,192 8600 Innovation&Technology Expenses $ 1,860,535 Note:Asterisk denotes a Continuing Balance Account. and that the Town transfer the following sums to meet,in part,appropriations made at this Town Meeting: $ 400,000 from Unreserved Fund Balance/Free Cash for line item 2110; $ 750,000 from the Health Claims Trust Fund for line item 2130; $ 637,576 from the PEG Access Special Revenue Fund for line items 2130,2600 and 8140; $ 16,125 from the Cemetery Sale of Lots Fund for line items 2410,2420 and 2430; $ 141,000 from the Transportation Demand Management/Public Transportation Stabilization Fund for line items 6000 and 7100-7400; $ 700,000 from Unreserved Fund Balance/Free Cash; $ 977,093 from the Water Enterprise Fund; $ 542,416 from the Sewer Enterprise Fund;and $ 286,104 from the Recreation Enterprise Fund. 8:10 p.m. The floor was opened for questions and debate. 8:10 p.m. Robert Avallone,Pct. 8,asked why non-member enrollment was disappearing from Minuteman Tech. Dr.Boquillion noted that it wasn't disappearing—they just did not have room for more students and they already had over 100 out of district students on a waiting list. 8:11 p.m. Mark Andersen,Pct.9,asked what the average in-district cost per student was,as well as out of district,and asked if the amount was set by the State. Dr.Boquillion noted that although each student was different due to percent of socio economic disadvantages as well as ability to pay,the average assessment for a Lexington student was$32,000 per pupil. For out of district,the state set a base of 125%above foundation,which equated to about$18,500. In addition,out of district communities paid about$6.500 for special ed services and another$7-8,000 for a capital fee and that they were also responsible for transportation.. 8:14 p.m. Robert Cohen,Pct.4,raised a Point of Order and stated that he had been having technical difficulties,so his attendance had not registered. He asked for this to be noted. 8:14 p.m. Mr.Andersen readdressed Dr.Boquillion to find out where the information regarding the formula being used could be found. Dr.Boquillion noted that it was available to the public,and he would be willing to point out the location on the website if Mr.Andersen wished. 8:15 p.m. Judy Crocker,Pct. 5,stated that on behalf of students and families,she would like to thank Dr.Boquillion for his years of service and for expanding the school's vocational and academic programming to blue ribbon school standing and for shepherding in a new generation of students that will experience a state-of-the-art building and athletic complex. The Moderator noted the same sentiments as expressed by Ms. Crocker and said that they would miss him. Dr.Boquillion thanked everyone and noted that he had enjoyed Lexington Town Meeting since the first one he had attended 15 years prior. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 8:16 p.m. Ms.Hai, Select Board Chair,noted the Select Board was unanimous in support of the Article. Kathleen Lenihan, School Committee Chair,said that the School Committee was unanimous in their support of the bus portion of the Article. Sanjay Padaki,Appropriations Committee Chair,stated the unanimous support of the Article 8:16 p.m. The Moderator requested that the staff scroll through the budget slowly so that all Members could see it. 8:17 p.m. Edward Dolan,Pct.3,asked the Superintendent to the explain expense increases line, and which were entitled"tuition". Dr.Hackett stated that in this instance,it was for outplacement expenses for Special Education. 8:18 p.m. Andrei Radulescu-Banu,Pct. 8,asked about a project in Town Center regarding metal grate covers being replaced and seemed that they were rusted even though the project was new. 8:20 pm. James Malloy,Town Manager,clarified that the grates were supposed to have a natural patina and were meant to rust naturally and would get darker 8:21 p.m. Bridger McGaw,Pct. 6 noted that the budget called out a new Tourism website. Mr. McGaw asked whether this was a part of the new Town website and whether there was a targeted delivery for the site. James Malloy,Town Manager stated that it was a new site for Tourism,specifically,and the target date was during FY23. Mr.McGaw stated that there had been questions in the Listserve regarding Hartwell Innovation District articles from last year and when it might come back to Town meeting as well as if there were a funded focus area either in Economic Development or Planning around that initiative and whether there was a timeline for bringing it back. Mr.Malloy said that there was not a funding item for that as it was something that existing staff would do. He noted that a Planning Director had just been hired and that once she got started,it was something she would be working on. Mr.McGaw noted that there was an interest in multi-unit housing stock and wondered if the budget provided adequate funding to prepare that type of planning and analysis to address the planning around the MBTA issues or affordable/multi-unit housing. Mr.Malloy said that he did not feel there was adequate funding and as others were aware,an organizational assessment had been funded,which was getting close to wrapping up with a report in the near future. Some of the reports provided by the interim consultant showed the Town's interest in activities related to affordable housing development that the Town did not have a single individual responsible for it as it was spread out among different people who had different expertise,but not necessarily affordable housing expertise,so there might be a recommendation coming in the next year or so to hire a Housing Director. The Moderator asked for the budget to be placed back on the screen and read the program lines and noted that the vote would require a 2/3 vote as there was a transfer from the stabilization fund. 8:26 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on Article 4. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 4–FY23 Operating Budget Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 177 2 1 MOTION CARRIES BY MORE THAN THE REQUIRED 2/3- 8:30 p.m. The Moderator declared the Meeting open under Article 2. The Moderator asked for a motion to receive the Report of the Community Preservation Committee and the subsequent update to the Report. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. h.Report of the Community Preservation Committee MOTION:Ms.Fenollosa moves that the report of the Community Preservation Committee be received and placed on file.As there were no objections,Report was accepted. 8:31 p.m. Ms.Fenollosa presented information on proposed Article 10 FY23 Projects. CONSENT AGENDA ARTICLE 6 APPROPRIATE FOR SENIOR SERVICES MOTION: That the Town appropriate$15,000 for the purpose of conducting the Senior Service Tax Work-Off Program, to be spent under the direction of the Town Manager; and that to meet this appropriation,$15,000 be raised in the tax levy. ARTICLE 8 APPROPRIATE FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION MOTION: That this Article will be indefinitely postponed. ARTICLE 10 APPROPRIATE THE FY2022 COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE OPERATING BUDGET AND CPA PROJECTS MOTION: That the Town hear and act on the report of the Community Preservation Committee on the FY2023 Community Preservation budget and,pursuant to the recommendations of the Community Preservation Committee,take the following actions: That the Town reserve for appropriation the following amounts from estimated FY2023 receipts as recommended by the Community Preservation Committee: 1. $813,600 for the acquisition,creation and preservation of open space; 2. $813,600 for the acquisition,preservation,rehabilitation and restoration of historic resources; 3. $813,600 for the acquisition,creation,preservation and support of community housing;and 4. $5,695,200 to the Unbudgeted Reserve. a) That$20,000 be appropriated for Archives and Records Management,and to meet this appropriation$20,000 be appropriated from the Historic Resources Reserve of the Community Preservation Fund; c) That$28,175 be appropriated for West Farm Meadow Preservation,and to meet this appropriation$28,175 be appropriated from the Open Space Reserve of the Community Preservation Fund; d) That$1,459,591 be appropriated for Playground Improvements-Poured-in-Place Surfaces,and to meet this appropriation$1,459,591 be appropriated from the Unbudgeted Reserve of the Community Preservation Fund; g) That$200,000 be appropriated for Park and Playground Improvements at Kinneens Park,and to meet this appropriation$200,000 be appropriated from the Unbudgeted Reserve of the Community Preservation Fund; h) That$250,000 be appropriated for Park Improvements-Fiske Athletic Field,and to meet this appropriation$250,000 be appropriated from the Unbudgeted Reserve of the Community Preservation Fund; March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. j) That$234,000 be appropriated for the preservation and rehabilitation of LexHAB affordable housing units,and to meet this appropriation$234,000 be appropriated from the Community Housing Reserve of the Community Preservation Fund; k) That this article is indefinitely postponed; 1) That$160,790 be appropriated for Lexington Housing Authority-Vynebrooke Village Preservation,and to meet this appropriation$160,790 be appropriated from the Community Housing Reserve of the Community Preservation Fund; m) That$1,935,635 be appropriated for CPA Debt Service and related costs,and to meet this appropriation$324,500 be appropriated from the Open Space Reserve of the Community Preservation Fund,$773,000 be appropriated from the Historic Resources Reserve of the Community Preservation Fund,and$838,135 be appropriated from the Unbudgeted Reserve of the Community Preservation Fund; and n) That$150,000 be appropriated for the Administrative Expenses and all other necessary and proper expenses of the Community Preservation Committee for FY2023 and to meet this appropriation$150,000 be appropriated from the Unbudgeted Reserve of the Community Preservation Fund. ARTICLE 11 APPROPRIATE FOR RECREATION CAPITAL PROJECTS MOTION: That$95,000 be appropriated for Pine Meadows Golf Course improvements,and all incidental costs related thereto;and that to meet this appropriation$95,000 be appropriated from Recreation Fund Retained Earnings. ARTICLE 12 APPROPRIATE FOR MUNICIPAL CAPITAL PROJECTS AND EQUIPMENT MOTION: That the following amounts be appropriated for the following municipal capital improvements and that each amount be appropriated as follows: d) Transportation Mitigation-$6,823.50 for the Transportation Safety Group for certain traffic, pedestrian and bike safety improvements,including the design and construction of smaller scale safety related projects and education programs related to alternative transportation and bike safety,and all incidental costs related thereto,and that to meet this appropriation $6,823.50 be appropriated from the Transportation Network Company Special Revenue Fund; e) Replace Pumper Truck-$650,000 to purchase a new pumper truck and all the incidental costs related thereto,and that to meet this appropriation$650,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; I) Townwide Culvert Replacement-$390,000 for the repair and replacement of culverts,and to take by eminent domain,purchase or otherwise acquire any fee,easement or other interest in land necessary therefor;and all incidental costs related thereto;and that to meet this appropriation$390,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; g) Equipment Replacement-$1,536,000 for the cost of equipment for the Department of Public Works and all incidental costs related thereto,and that to meet this appropriation,$145,000 be appropriated from Water Fund Retained Earnings;$145,000 be appropriated from Wastewater Fund Retained Earnings;$1,246,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; h) Sidewalk Improvements-$800,000 for rebuilding and repaving existing sidewalks,and all incidental costs related thereto,and to take by eminent domain,purchase or otherwise acquire any fee,easement or other interest in land necessary therefor;and that to meet this March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. appropriation$563,077 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; $539 be appropriated from the unexpended bond proceeds issued under Article 6A of the 2009 Special Town Meeting;$11,486 be appropriated from the unexpended bond proceeds issued under Article IOG of the 2011 Annual Town Meeting;$48,644 be appropriated from the unexpended bond proceeds issued under Article 15A of the 2016 Annual Town Meeting; $81,838 be appropriated from the unexpended bond proceeds issued under Article 4 of the 2016 Special Town Meeting;$42,694 be appropriated from the unexpended bond proceeds issued under Article 16H of the 2017 Annual Town Meeting;$1,090 be appropriated from the unexpended bond proceeds issued under Article 16H of the 2018 Annual Town Meeting;and $50,632 be appropriated from the unexpended bond proceeds issued under Article 19 of the 2018 Annual Town Meeting; i) Townwide Signalization Improvements-$125,000 for the replacement of traffic and pedestrian signals and related roadway work and expenses incidental thereto,and that to meet this appropriation$125,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; j) Storm Drainage Improvements and NPDES compliance-$570,000 for constructing and reconstructing storm drains and all incidental costs related thereto,and that to meet this appropriation$570,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; k) Comprehensive Watershed Stormwater Management-$390,000 to fund watershed storm management projects and all incidental costs related thereto,and to take by eminent domain, purchase or otherwise acquire any fee,easement or other interest in land necessary therefor; and that to meet this appropriation,$390,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; 1) Street Improvements-$2,669,767 for road reconstruction,repairs and resurfacing and all incidental costs related thereto,and to take by eminent domain,purchase or otherwise acquire any fee,easement or other interest in land necessary therefor,and that to meet this appropriation$2,669,767 be raised in the tax levy,and authorize the Town to accept and expend any additional funds provided or to be provided by The Commonwealth of Massachusetts through the Massachusetts Department of Transportation; m) Hydrant Replacement Program-$150,000 for the replacement of fire hydrants and all incidental costs related thereto,and that to meet this appropriation$75,000 be appropriated from Water Fund Retained Earnings and$75,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; r) Network Redundancy and Improvement Plan-$945,000 to build a stand-alone fiber network for town computing and communications,and all the incidental costs thereto,and to take by eminent domain,purchase or otherwise acquire any fee,easement or other interest in land necessary therefor,and that to meet this appropriation$945,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; s) Application Implementation-$158,500 for Town software applications,implementation and related costs,and that to meet this appropriation$158,500 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; t) Scanning-Electronic Document Management-$110,000 to scan existing paper documents into the Town's document management systems,and that to meet this appropriation$110,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance. ARTICLE 13 APPROPRIATE FOR WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS MOTION: That the Select Board be authorized to make water distribution system improvements, including the installation of new water mains and replacement or cleaning and lining of existing water mains and stand pipes,conducting engineering studies and the purchase and installation of equipment in connection therewith,and pay all incidental costs related thereto,in such accepted or March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. unaccepted streets or other land as the Select Board may determine,subject to the assessment of betterments or otherwise,and to take by eminent domain,purchase or otherwise acquire any fee, easement or other interest in land necessary therefor;and to appropriate$2,200,000 for such distribution systems improvements and land acquisition;and that to meet this appropriation, $600,000 be raised through water user fees,and$1,600,000 be appropriated from Water Enterprise Fund Retained Earnings. ARTICLE 14 APPROPRIATE FOR WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS MOTION: That the following be authorized,and that the following amounts be appropriated for the following capital improvements and that each amount be raised as indicated: (a) the Select Board be authorized to install sanitary sewer mains and sewerage systems and replacements thereof,and pay all incidental costs related thereto,in such accepted or unaccepted streets or other land as the Select Board may determine,subject to the assessment of betterments or otherwise,in accordance with Chapter 504 of the Acts of 1897,as amended,or otherwise,and to take by eminent domain,purchase or otherwise acquire any fee,easement or other interest in land necessary therefor;to appropriate for such installation and land acquisition the sum of$1,020,000;and that to meet this appropriation,$300,000 shall be raised through wastewater user fees,and$720,000 be appropriated from Wastewater Fund Retained Earnings;and that (b) $2,000,000 be appropriated for pump station upgrades and all incidental costs related thereto,and to raise such amount$500,000 be appropriated from Wastewater Fund Retained Earnings,and the Treasurer,with the approval of the Select Board,is authorized to borrow$1,500,000 under M.G.L. Chapter 44, Section 8(4)or any other enabling authority;and further that the Treasurer,with the approval of the Select Board,is authorized to borrow all or a portion of such amount from the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority and in connection therewith to enter into a loan agreement and/or security agreement. ARTICLE 15 APPROPRIATE FOR SCHOOL CAPITAL PROJECTS AND EQUIPMENT MOTION: That$1,343,006 be appropriated for maintaining and upgrading the Lexington Public School technology systems,including the acquisition of new equipment in connection therewith, and that to meet this appropriation $1,343,006 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance. ARTICLE 16 APPROPRIATE FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS MOTION: That the following amounts be appropriated for the following capital improvements to public facilities and that each amount be raised as follows: a) Public Facilities Bid Documents-$100,000 for professional services to produce design development,construction documents,and bid administration services for capital projects and all incidental costs related thereto,and that to meet this appropriation$100,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; b) Facility and Site Improvements-$295,000 for building flooring programs,school paving and sidewalk improvement programs,and school traffic safety March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. improvements and all incidental costs related thereto,and that to meet this appropriation$295,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; c) Public Facilities Mechanical/Electrical System Replacements-$787,000 for replacement of HVAC and electrical systems that have exceeded their useful life, and that to meet this appropriation$787,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; d) Municipal Building Envelopes and Associated Systems-$219,540 for extraordinary repairs and modifications to municipal buildings and systems,and that to meet this appropriation$219,540 be raised in the tax levy; e) Townwide Roofing Program-$428,000 for roof replacements and repairs, including the payment of all costs incidental or related thereto;and that to meet this appropriation,$428,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; I) School Building Envelopes and Associated Systems-$251,400 for extraordinary repairs and modifications to school buildings and systems,and that to meet this appropriation$251,400 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; ARTICLE 17 APPROPRIATE TO POST EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE LIABILITY FUND MOTION: That$1,935,486 be appropriated to the town of Lexington Post Employment Insurance Liability Fund established pursuant to Chapter 317 of the Acts of 2002, and that to meet this appropriation, $2,761 be appropriated from Water Fund receipts, $3,004 be appropriated from Wastewater Fund receipts,$750,000 be raised in the tax levy,and$1,179,721 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance. ARTICLE 18 RESCIND PRIOR BORROWING AUTHORIZATIONS MOTION: That the unused borrowing authorities as set forth below be and are hereby rescinded: Town Meeting Amount to be Article Action Project Description Rescinded 10 2014 STM Community Center Renovations $ 10,453.00 4 2015 STM Pelham Road Accessibility Study $ 41,340.00 12I 2017 ATM Dam Repair $ 126,284.00 16I 2019 ATM DPW Equipment $ 98,445.00 27 2019 ATM Visitors Center Supplemental $ 70,947.00 ARTICLE 20 APPROPRIATE FOR PRIOR YEARS'UNPAID BILLS MOTION: That the Department of Public Facilities be authorized to pay an invoice for$6,261.75 to Bay State Consultants for services rendered in fiscal year 2021,and that to meet this appropriation, $6,261.75 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance. ARTICLE 22 APPROPRIATE FOR AUTHORIZED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS MOTION: That this article be indefinitely postponed. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. ARTICLE 23 APPROPRIATE FROM DEBT SERVICE STABILIZATION FUND MOTION: That$191,112.60 be appropriated from the Debt Service Stabilization Fund to offset the FY2023 debt service of the bond dated February 1, 2003 issued for funding additions and renovations to the Lexington High School, Clarke Middle School and Diamond Middle School as refunded with bonds dated December 8,2011. ARTICLE 29 ACCEPT MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL LAW CHAPTER 41 SECTION 110A MOTION: That the Town accept Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 41, Section 110(a)and authorize the Town Manager to close any Town office on any Saturday to the same extent as if such Saturday were a legal holiday. ARTICLE 32 SELECT BOARD TO ACCEPT EASEMENTS MOTION:That,until July 1,2023,the Select Board be authorized to acquire on behalf of the Town easements for the following purposes:roads,sidewalks,vehicular,bicycle or pedestrian access or passage,and drainage and utilities,where such easements are acquired at no cost to the Town;and are required pursuant to a land use permit,site plan review,or memorandum of understanding. ARTICLE 33 AUTHORIZE AND RATIFY REMOTE TOWN MEETINGS MOTION: That this article be indefinitely postponed. ARTICLE 36 AMEND ZONING BYLAW AND ZONING MAP-MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENTS AND MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING MOTION: That this Article be referred to Planning Board. ARTICLE 40 AMEND ZONING BYLAW SUSTAINABLE RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVES (Citizen Article) MOTION: That the Article be referred to the Planning Board. 8:43 p.m. The Moderator declared the Meeting was open under the Consent Agenda. She noted that each and every one of the motions had the unanimous support of the Select Board, Appropriation Committee,and the Capital Expenditures Committee(for capital items) and that these were items that routinely have the unanimous,or near unanimous support of Town Meeting members. She noted that there they would not hear presentations or debate on these items,but would allow questions from Town Meeting members on any of the items as she read the topic of each motion.If 10 or more members requested that a particular item be removed from the consent agenda for separate debate and consideration,she stated that she would pull that item off and take it up at a later point. 8:45 p.m. Ms.Hai, Select Board Chair,moved all motions on the Consent Agenda. 8:46 p.m. The Moderator noted that there would be two recusals from specific Articles on the Consent Agenda. Select Board Member Suzanne Barry stated that she would be recused from Article 17 as her husband was an employee of the Town. Select Board Member Doug Lucerne stated that he was an abutter to the property listed in Article 10,and would recuse himself from this particular Article. 8:47 p.m. The Moderator opened the floor for questions. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 8:48 p.m. Jodia Finnagan,Pct.6,questioned why LexHAB received funds without there being knowledge of how they were spent. James Malloy,Town Manager stated that LexHAB was a part of the Town's annual audit,so they had the history of how they spent funds. 8:48 p.m. Kenneth Shine,Pct.2,asked for clarification regarding 10i. Ms.Hai pointed out that l0i was not on the Consent Agenda. Mr. Shine withdrew his question. 8:49 p.m. Cynthia Arens,Pct.3,questioned maintenance and improvements to Housing projects. She noted that while she appreciates the CPC looking out for safety and maintenance but would like to consider Mass Save rebates for housing complexes. Ms.Fenollosa,asked for clarification if Ms.Arens was asking that if the State didn't provide funding whether the CPC would look to provide it. Ms.Arens agreed with the statement and said that she wondered which agencies looked at energy efficiency in the units. Ms.Fenollosa said that the CPC is reactive,not proactive,so if a particular housing development determined a need to look at energy efficiency it would apply to the CPC for a project. The CPC would then review and recommend to Town Meeting if appropriate. 8:52 p.m. Avram Baskin,Pct.2,questioned that given what happened when the structure was replaced at Sutherland Park and Liberty heights,whether they had done community outreach regarding the improvements proposed in the Article. Melissa Battite,Director of Recreation and Community Programs,stated that community outreach had drastically changed since the Sutherland experience and that they had already held one community outreach to the Kinneens neighborhood provide preliminary information. 8:54 p.m. Bridger McGaw,Pct. 6,asked for confirmation that FY25 was the year when all CPA debt would be paid off. Carolyn Kosnoff,Assistant Manager of Finance confirmed this information. Mr.McGraw asked if there was a policy in place to evaluate debt before projects are funded through CPA debt. Ms.Kosnoff stated that they did look at that closely and would look to issue debt if there were other options,but not a specific policy. 8:56 p.m. Bronte Abraham,Pct.3,noted that Parks and Recreation had dramatically increased their adaptive programming,and when speaking about accessibility—were they speaking about to the existing walk paths or new so that fields such as Fiske would be accessibly by wheelchair. Ms.Battite noted that in 2017 the Department had gone through an ADA recreation facilities assessment and they had recommendations for all outdoor facilities for ADA improvements. She said that whenever they improve a field,they look at the walkways. She further stated that the Study could be found on the website. 8:58 p.m. Jerold Michelson,Pct.5,asked what was next in the queue for sidewalk and signalization improvements. John Livsey,Town Engineer,said that the next signals would be for Lowell,East,and North Street. He further noted that if Mr.Michelson were referring to the signals at Mass and Worthen,it was not at full operation yet until it was completed. David Pinsonneault,Director of Public Works,stated that the list of sidewalks was in the Brown Book,and that this was a regular Article to repair existing sidewalks. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 9:00 p.m. Nyles Barnert,Pct.4,noted that years ago LexHAB stopped using Minuteman students due to a change in State law. He wondered if the Select Board had considered a Home Rule Petition to allow a waiver to be able to do so. Mina Makarious,Town Counsel,stated that to his knowledge there had not been consideration to do that,and that it would require a change to 30B,a special legislation exception procurement,but in the meantime there were other options that LexHAB had discussed with the Town Manager's Office and Counsel to use donated labor when appropriate,but it couldn't be for the whole project. 9:01 p.m. Sanjay Padaki,Pct. 8,questioned whether Article 29(accept MGL)meant they had a plan to have town offices on Saturday. James Malloy,Town Manager,stated that this particular statute counted towards deadlines in election cycles and pushed the deadlines that fell on Saturdays to the prior business day. 9:02 p.m. As there were no further questions,the Moderator opened the portal for voting Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared the vote was more than 2/3rds. Upon consultation with Counsel,it was noted that as one Article was to pay unpaid bills,the vote quantum should be updated to 4/5ths(supermajority). Therefore, the declaration was updated to show that: Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Approve the Consent Agenda Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 172 3 2 MOTION CARRIES BY MORE THAN THE REQUIRED 4/5THS 9:07 p.m. The Moderator stated that she would turn the gavel over to Deputy Town Moderator Barry Orenstein to take up the next portion of the Meeting. Moderator Orenstein called for a procedural motion in order to take up Article 10 items b,e,f,i. 9:08 p.m. Ms.Hai, Select Board Chair,moved that the Town Meeting take up the up Article 10 items b,e,f,and i. As there was no objection,the Moderator opened the Meeting under Articles IOb,e,f, and i. Marilyn.Fenollosa,Chair of the Community Preservation Committee,moved all Articles and then they were voted individually. The Moderator opened the Meeting on Article l Ob. b) That$155,000 be appropriated for Wright Farm Barn Stabilization,and to meet this appropriation $155,000 be appropriated from the Historic Resources Reserve of the Community Preservation Fund; 9:10 p.m. Alexandra Dohan,Conservation Commission Member,and Chair of the Wright Farm Advisory Subcommittee,presented information regarding Wright Farm barn stabilization. 9:13 p.m. Marilyn Fenollosa,Chair of the Community Preservation Committee,stated that the Community Preservation Committee recommended the project on a vote of 8-1. Joseph Pato,Member of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board was unanimous in their support of the item. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,said that the Capital Expenditures Committee was unanimous in their support of the Article. Eric Michelson,Member of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee voted 8-0 for approval of the Article. 9:14 p.m. The floor was open for discussion and debate. Bridger McGaw,Pct. 6,stated that he understood that this was a phased plan,and asked how many phases would be after stabilization. Ms.Dohan stated that this past plan would be phase I,phase II would be to finalize plans for upgrading the main floor of the barn to enable public programming in the area. The potential longer-term would be to refurbish the upper stories of the barn. Mr.McGaw said that he was worried about year-to-year funding without an actual plan, and urged that it was would be clearer in the future. 9:18 p.m. Juan Stella,Pct.2,asked what the expected expenses or budgeting to complete the other phases. Ms.Dohen said that they hoped to get private grant funds and as it was an old building it was difficult to make concrete plans,but perhaps a few million long term. She noted that the School had considered using the property for the science program. Meeting members continued discussion and debate of the Article. 9:26 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on Article IOb. Moderator Brown assisted with the process. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Approve Article 10b—Wright Farm Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 168 5 2 MOTION CARRIES 9:30 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting on Article I Oe e) That$680,000 be appropriated for the renovation of the Center Playground Bathrooms and Maintenance Building,and all incidental costs related thereto;and to meet this appropriation $680,000 be appropriated from the Undesignated Fund Balance of the Community Preservation Fund; 9:40 p.m. Lisa Rhodes,Recreational Committee Member,gave a presentation regarding the Article and stated the unanimous support of the Recreation Committee. After the presentation,Ms.Rhodes noted that the resurfacing of the hardcourts,and renovation of the center recreation restrooms,including the DPW maintenance shed were an essential part of their efforts to maintain and enhance the recreational facilities and to better serve those who use the site. 9:41 p.m. Marilyn.Fenollosa,Chair of the Community Preservation Committee,stated that the Community Preservation Committee recommended the Article by a vote of 7-1. Joseph Pato,Member of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board supported passage with a vote of 4-1. Kathy Lenihan,Chair of the School Committee,stated the unanimous support of the School Committee and noted that it was essential that students and the community have safe and functional restrooms. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,said that the Capital Expenditures Committee unanimously recommended approval of the Article. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Eric Michelson,Member of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee voted 8-0 to recommend approval of the Article. 9:44 p.m. The floor was opened for debate and questions. Mark Andersen,Pct.9,asked which member of the Select Board did not vote for the project. Joseph Pato said that he was opposed to the motion as he supported the project,but did not support additional construction in the Center Recreation and School complex until the Town determined how to best layout all the facilities to make best use of the land, especially if the High School project were undertaken and that this might constrain its design or need to be demolished and recommended a comprehensive analysis,first. Mr.Andersen asked if there were issues with equipment storage that wouldn't be addressed now and that might be brought back for further appropriation. Ms.Battite,Recreation Director,said that the original scope was for the building only, but a feasibility study gave feedback on external storage. She noted that the bathrooms in the building and the existing storage in the building were part of the request,and the issue with external storage would be looked at in the coming year and gave a brief overview of their plans. 9:49 p.m. LexFUN!, 1661 Mass Ave,gave a prepared comment in strong support of the Article stating that it was a project long overdue. 9:50 p.m. Meeting members and members of the public continued to discuss and debate the Article. 10:10 p.m. Sue Kingsbury,Pct.9,called the question. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Terminate Debate Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 110 53 10 MOTION CARRIES 10:15 p.m. Ms.Rhodes declined to make a summary statement on the Article. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 10e—Center Playuound Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 146 19 8 MOTION CARRIES 10:18 P.M. The Moderator opened the Meeting on Article IOf. I)That$2,500,000 be appropriated for Park Improvements-Hard Court Resurfacing at the center recreation complex,including basketball and tennis courts,and to meet this appropriation$2,500,000 be appropriated from the Unbudgeted Reserve of the Community Preservation Fund; 10:19 p.m. Lisah Rhodes,Vice-Chair of the Recreation Committee,presented information regarding the Article and noted the unanimous support of the Recreation Committee for its passage. 10:23 p.m. Taylor Singh,Pct.6,raised a Point of Order to serve Notice of Reconsideration on Article IOe. 10:24 p.m. Marilyn.Fenollosa,Chair of the Community Preservation Committee,stated that the Community Preservation Committee favorably recommended the Article by a vote of 8- 0-1. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Joseph Pato,Member of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board supported the Article by a vote of 4-1. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,said that the Capital Expenditures Committee supported the Article unanimously. Eric Michelson,Member of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee recommended the Article by a vote of 8-0. Kathleen Lenihan, School Committee Chair noted the unanimous support of the School Committee. 10:27 p.m. The floor was opened for debate and questions. Valerie Overton,Pct. 1,asked for confirmation that if they wanted to delay until they had more information regarding the high school project that it would be a 1.5 year delay. James Malloy,Town Manager,said that this was the same as for the prior Article. Ms. Overton asked the likelihood of safety issues or closure(and the nature of those issues)during that delay period. Ms.Battite,Recreation Director,said that as the asphalt begins to crack it became problematic for play,but more of a safety risk for the athlete or novice player. She further noted that the Recreation Committee and the Town would need to consider how much investment keeping the courts open would be over the course of time while waiting. Courts would be closed once they were beyond repair. Ms. Overton asked whether the likelihood of closure and maintenance during the waiting period would be similar to current conditions. Ms.Battite said that she could not project an answer,but that once the cracking began,it continued,and the problem persisted,so each court would need to be looked at individually and see which way the cracking went. Ms. Overton asked if they waited to coordinate with the high school project,whether they would consider location and design of the courts. Ms.Battite said that this hadn't been considered as the entire parcel would be looked at during the feasibility study. 10:31 p.m. Andrew Friedlich,Pct. 5,noted that he approved of the Article,but with reservations and hoped that the Recreation Department would find a suitable pickleball locations not close to residents. 10:32 p.m. Avram Baskin,Pct.2,stated that he does not support the Article and felt that it needed more research,especially with regards to the noise from pickleball. 10:34 p.m. Richard Petrasso,39 Parker Street,explained that as an abutter he was deeply concerned about the noise from pickleball and that it exceeded safe noise levels. He asked Meeting Members to reject the article. 10:36 p.m. Taylor Singh,Pct. 6,asked whether the land that the courts and bathroom facilities sat on was LPS property. Dr.Hackett stated that she thought it did. Ms. Singh asked when the feasibility study would be completed,if the Meeting approved it. Dr.Hackett stated they were entering into the eligibility period on June 1st,and that it was a 270 day(9 month)process. After this phase,it was design and OPM(owner's project manager)and from that point forward it went into feasibility,which lasted for 1 year. She anticipated feasibility for September 2023-24,with construction from September 2025-27. Dr.Hackett said that she wished to clarify that the land was actually recreation land and they were currently starting a conversation on an article 97 land swap. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Ms. Singh asked if the feasibility study would inform the footprint of the new building, and if so,when would they know it. Dr.Hackett noted that it would,and they were currently working to get consensus before feasibility for placement,siting,type of building but expectations were September of 2023-24. She noted that eligibility period was 9 months,which was to determine Lexington's readiness for a project and then they would need to be invited into feasibility. Ms. Singh asked for clarification that it was 9 months plus a year before they knew the footprint. Dr.Hackett agreed and said that by September of 2024 they should have that information. 10:41 p.m. James Malloy,Town Manager,noted that while Dr.Hackett had clarified that the courts were on park land,he wanted to make clear that the article 97 process was lengthy and detailed,and would require that it came before Town Meeting to request special legislation as well as a review by the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs in order to exchange parkland for other land that was equal to/equal size. 10:43 p.m. Stephen Kaufman,Pct.5,called the question. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Terminate Debate Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 90 63 14 MOTION CARRIES 10:46 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on Article l Of. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 1 O—Park Improvements—Hard Court Resurfacinu Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 79 74 13 MOTION CARRIES The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 10i. i)That$100,000 be appropriated to create a Lincoln Park Master Plan,and to meet this appropriation $100,000 be appropriated from the Unbudgeted Reserve of the Community Preservation Fund; 10:49 p.m. Lisa O'Brien,Recreation Committee Member,gave a presentation on Article I Oi and noted the unanimous support of the Recreation Committee for the Article. 10:51 p.m. Ruth Thomas,Pct.4,raised a Point of Order to serve Notice of Reconsideration on Article IOf. 10:52 p.m. Marilyn.Fenollosa,Chair of the Community Preservation Committee,stated that the Community Preservation Committee voted 9-0 in support of the project. Joseph Pato,Member of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board was unanimous in their support of the Article. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,said that the Capital Expenditures Committee was unanimous in their support of the Article. Eric Michelson,Member of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee was unanimous(8-0)in their support of the Article. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 10:53 p.m. Ken Shine,Pct.2,noted that other CPC articles seemed to be for repairs or other physical projects and that this was a"plan"—he wondered if this was typical as he didn't think they had done this before. Ms.Fenollosa said that they had done studies before and in most projects a study was necessary before they could recommend construction funds as it would provide context for feasibility. Mr. Shine asked for clarification of the 6 capital projects they had planned,as well as their estimated costs. Ms.Battite noted that the six possible projects coming up were Lincoln Park Field improvements,(3 synthetic fields,3 years in a row for replacement)this was split between CPC and capital approximately$1.2 million for each of the synthetic fields;a feasibility study for those fields in the year prior,$25,000;playground replacement/improvement,$800,000;and the fitness path equipment stations,estimated $50,000. 10:58 p.m. David Kanter,Pct. 7,stated that he wished to commend Recreation for doing this type of Master Plan,and noted that it did not dictate what would be done—but what may be done and money well spent. 10:59 p.m. As there were no further questions,the Moderator opened voting on Article 10i. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 10i—Lincoln Park Master Plan Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 152 3 6 MOTION CARRIES 11:02 p.m. Moderator Orenstein noted that he would now hand the gavel back to Moderator Brown. Moderator Brown thanked him and resumed the gavel,then asked for a Motion to adjourn the Meeting. 11:03 p.m. Ms.Jill Hai, Select Board Chair,Motioned to Adjourn the Annual Town Meeting to 7:30 p.m.Monday,April 4,2022,such meeting to be held remotely. As there were no objections,the Moderator declared that Motion adopted and the Meeting adjourned. April 4,2022 Adiourned Session of the 2022 Annual Town Meeting Moderator Deborah Brown called the third session of 2022 Annual Town Meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.on Monday,April 4,2022.The meeting was held remotely as voted by order of the Select Board and request of the Moderator. 7:31 p.m. The Moderator asked that all Members log in their attendance. She then stated that she would keep the module open while making announcements. She reminded Meeting Members that there was a line for tech support and explained the location of the comments section on the website for any members of the public who wished to participate in that way. 7:33 p.m. Anthony Galaitsis,Precinct 1,raised a Point of Order in that he had voted but didn't see his name listed,and asked that his attendance be recorded. 7:35 p.m. The Moderator stated that a quorum had been reached and opened the Meeting under Article 7. ARTICLE 7 APPROPRIATE FOR CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 7:36 p.m. MOTION:Mr.Pato moves that the Town appropriate$50,570 for the purpose of planning and conducting outreach to update the Sustainable Action Plan with a Climate Action plan,including all incidental costs related thereto;and that to meet this appropriation$30,000 be appropriated from the unexpended funds authorized under Article 7 of the 2018 Annual Town Meeting;and$20,570 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. A presentation was given by Martha Duffield,Chief Equity Officer,regarding the Climate Action Plan. 7:39 p.m. Joseph Pato noted the unanimous support of the Select Board for the Article. Margaret Muckenhoupt,Member of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee had voted 8-0 to recommend the Article. Cynthia Arens,Member of the Sustainable Lexington Committee,stated that the Sustainable Lexington Committee had unanimously voted to support the Article. 7:40 p.m. The Meeting was opened for discussion and debate. Judith Glixon,2 Aerial Street,asked the Members to vote favorably on the Article. Members discussed the Article. 7:46 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on Article 7. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 7—Climate Action Plan Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 174 1 4 MOTION CARRIES 7:50 p.m. The Moderator then called for a procedural motion in order to take up Article 12 items a,b,c,n,o,p,and q,but noted that they would be voted individually. Doug Lucerne,Vice-Chair of the Select Board,moved that the Town Meeting take up the up Article 12 items a,b,c,n,o,p,and q. 7:50 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 12a. a) Hartwell District Signage-$65,000 to add new signage on Hartwell Avenue and the jug handle on Bedford Street,and that to meet this appropriation$65,000 be appropriated from the Transportation Management Overlay District Stabilization Fund; Douglas Lucente,Vice-Chair of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board recommended,on a vote of 4-1(Sandeen),passage of the Article. He stated that Mr. Sandeen supported the safety related signage of the Article,but believed that the Town should spend money on higher priority items than branding related signage. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,said that the Capital Expenditures Committee recommended the Article 5-1. Sanjay Padaki,Vice-Chair of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee recommended the Article with a vote of 8-0. 7:54 p.m. The Meeting was opened for discussion and debate including safety and design of signs. 8:07 p.m. Matt Daggett,Pct.2,moved to Amend Article 12a as follows: MOTION: That the following amounts be appropriated for the following municipal capital improvements and that each amount be appropriated as follows: a) Hartwell£ 6fl-tneP.h.m c S ,fet1„Signage - $65,000 to add new signage on Hartwell Avenue and the jug handle on Bedford Street carom ttiiia. 11l�w �i �amia aro :.'d a nfified I)y ttliia; ll am twell m a�niw a t tta taford Str a t&W Stv'h'W Stra ct 711?aro d S„lfa ty .q„ m ��������.� ID' m°t ,and that to meet this appropriation $65,000 be appropriated from 1.am.�....... .. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. the Transportation Management Overlay District Stabilization Fund; Douglas Lucente,Vice-Chair of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board had three members opposed to the Amendment and two were waiting to hear debate. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,said that the Capital Expenditures Committee had 2 members in favor and 4 against the Amendment. Sanjay Padaki,Vice-Chair of the Appropriation Committee,asked for a moment to canvas his Committee. 8:11 P.M. While Mr.Padaki reviewed the item with the Appropriation Committee,the Meeting was opened for discussion and debate on the Amendment. Leonard Morse-Fortier.Pct.7,requested that groups that opposed the Amendment explain their reasoning as safety was concerned. Mr.Lucente explained that the main reason he,Ms.Barry,and Ms.Hai objected was that this was a$65,000 appropriation,which was small,and in line with other way- finding signage that helped people find out where they were going and felt that it was money well spent as the Town was trying to create more commercial development in the area. Mr.Lamb noted that as previously stated,the Capital Expenditure Committee had voted 5-1 in favor of the main motion for 12a and noted that the one member opposed had already voiced concerns,and one additional member joined them in that opinion. Mr.Parker,Appropriations Committee Chair,said that after voting,their position was 6-2 in favor of the Amendment. Mr.Morse-Fortier followed up by asked the Select Board to explain how the area could be called"Hartwell Innovation". Mr.Lucente replied that the Select Board had the right to name areas in Town. Members continued discussion and debate regarding the Amendment including concerns regarding signage,safety,and traffic. 8:36 p.m. The Moderator noted that the time for debate had ended and asked Mr.Daggett for a summary statement. Mr.Daggett stated that in the Select Board meeting informational packet there were 4 proposed signs,2 large signs—1 at the jug handle and 1 at the Wood Street/Hartwell intersection that would be part of the branding,and 2 secondary markers to help with "branding",so potentially only one of the signs would be to address safety issues. He further noted that in the road safety audit,there were 30 different recommendations for safety enhancements and the only one for signage was for the jug handle and listed as a medium payoff,with a low cost of$10,000 or less. He stated that MassDOT had jurisdiction for the improvement. 8:38 p.m. Sanjay Padaki,Pct. 8,raised a Point of Order that he would like to know the decision of the Select Board members now that they had heard debate. Mr.Pato noted that based on the debate he would vote in favor of the Amendment and that Mr. Sandeen would also be voting yes on the Amendment. The Moderator opened voting on the Amendment. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 12a—Hartwell District Signage-Amendment Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 116 52 10 MOTION CARRIES a)Hartwell Area Safety Signage-$65,000 to add new signage on Hartwell Avenue and the jug handle on Bedford Street for the purposes of addressing issues identified by the Hartwell Avenue at March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Bedford Street&Westview Street Road Safety Audit,excluding signage branding the Hartwell Innovation Park,and that to meet this appropriation$65,000 be appropriated from the Transportation Management Overlay District Stabilization Fund; 8:43 p.m. The Moderator noted that the Amended Article was now the Main Motion and asked if any of the groups who had spoken had a different position. Mr.Lucente noted that the Select Board voted in favor 5-0 on the Motion. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,stated that the vote did not change and was 5-1 in favor. Sanjay Padaki,Vice-Chair of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee had voted 8-0 in support of the Article as Amended. 8:44 p.m. The Moderator opened the floor for discussion and debate. 8:46 p.m. Pam Hoffman,Pct. 7,asked that the Motion be shown on screen. She then asked if under the Article whether a sign could be put up further down Bedford St.,and not on the jug handle,as long as it addressed how to use it. Town Counsel,Mina Makarious,Town Counsel,noted that this was an appropriation for signage related to safety. He stated that actual placement was usually something that the Town Engineer advised on,and wouldn't prevent other signage. The Moderator requested that Counsel clarify if anything in the wording of the Article would prevent a sign where Ms.Hoffman suggested. Mr.Makarious noted that it would not prevent signage elsewhere,as long as there was adequate appropriation to pay for making it. The Moderator questioned whether this Article would not be able to be used for the signage as suggested by Ms.Hoffman. Mr.Makarious stated that it was a little hard to tell as the way the appropriation was worded had to do with the safety audit. If it was determined that further down Bedford Street would better address the MassDOT safety audit,it could be done,and would require engineering judgments on best placement. He further stated that he did not believe there was an exact plan for placement,but that it was assumed it was at the jug handle,and if a different placement were contrary to the safety audit,then no,it could not be done. 8:49 p.m. David Kanter,Pct. 7,raised a Point of Order,asking for the language to be shown, because he thought that it distinctly specified as a jug handle. The Moderator noted that Mr.Makarious had just spoken to that point and she would be moving on. 8:50 p.m. Meeting members continued discussion and debate. 8:54 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on Article 12a as Amended. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 12a—Hartwell District Signage-as Amended Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 160 9 10 MOTION CARRIES WITH MORE THAN NECESSARY 2/3RDS 8:54 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 12b. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. b) Townwide Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan-$65,000 to develop a townwide pedestrian and bicycle plan,and that to meet this appropriation$65,000 be appropriated from the Traffic Mitigation Stabilization Fund; Douglas Lucente,Vice-Chair of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board unanimously supported passage of the Article. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,said that the Capital Expenditures Committee supported the motion. Sanjay Padaki,Vice-Chair of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee by a vote of 8-0 supported passage of the motion. Charles Hornig,Planning Board Chair,noted the unanimous support of the Planning Board. 8:59 p.m. The Meeting was opened for discussion and debate. 9:04 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on Article 12b. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 12b—Townwide Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 169 2 3 MOTION CARRIES WITH MORE THAN NECESSARY 2/3RDS 9:18 P.M. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 12c. c) South Lexington and Forbes-Marrett Traffic Mitigation Plans-$175,000 to develop traffic mitigation plans for the South Lexington Transportation Management Overlay District and the Forbes-Marrett Transportation Management Overlay District,and that to meet this appropriation $175,000 be appropriated from the Traffic Mitigation Stabilization Fund, Douglas Lucente,Vice-Chair of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board unanimously supported passage of the Article. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,said that the Capital Expenditures Committee unanimously recommended approval. Sanjay Padaki,Vice-Chair of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee, by a vote of 8-0,recommended approval of the motion. Charles Hornig,Planning Board Chair,noted the unanimous support of the Planning Board. 9:10 P.M. The Meeting was opened for discussion and debate. 9:14 p.m. The Moderator opened voted on Article 12c. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: 12c—South Lexington and Forbes-Marrett Traffic Mitigation Plans Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 173 1 2 MOTION CARRIES WITH MORE THAN NECESSARY 2/3RDS 9:16 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 12n. n) Battle Green Streetscape Improvements-$4,975,000 for design,construction and project management for the roadways and intersections around the Lexington Battle Green,and all incidental costs related thereto,and to take by eminent domain,purchase or otherwise acquire any March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. fee,easement or other interest in land necessary therefor,and that to meet this appropriation $1,360,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance,and the Treasurer, with the approval of the Select Board,is authorized to borrow$3,615,000 under M.G.L. Chapter 44, Section 7(1),or any other enabling authority, Suzanne Barry,Member of the Select Board,noted that she would be recused from this Article as her employer was a direct abutter of the project area and part of the duties of her position were direct oversight of the building and grounds. 9:17 p.m. John Livsey,Town Engineer,gave a presentation on the proposed Battle Green Streetscape Improvements and project schedule. 9:25 p.m. Douglas Lucente,Vice-Chair of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board recommended approval by a vote of 4-1(Barry recused). Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,said that the Capital Expenditures Committee was unanimously in support of the Article. Sanjay Padaki,Vice-Chair of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee,by a vote of 8-0,supported passage of the Article. 9:26 p.m. The Meeting was opened for discussion and debate. Members discussed concerns with traffic safety,accident rates,high usage times,construction traffic and design standards. Mr.Livsey noted that stop signs would be eliminated in the roundabout and replaced with yield signs. 9:50 p.m. Marsha Baker,Pct. 7,called the question. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Terminate Debate Yes No Abstain 111 48 16 MOTION CARRIES 9:52 p.m. Mr.Lucente refrained from summary comments. The Moderator opened voting on Article 12n Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 12n—Battle Green Streetscape Improvements Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 167 2 4 MOTION CARRIES WITH MORE THAN NECESSARY 2/3RDS 9:56 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 120. o) Municipal Parking Lot Improvements-$60,000 for the design and redesign of the Town's municipal parking lots,and that to meet this appropriation$60,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance, Douglas Lucente,Vice-Chair of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board unanimously supported the Article Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,said that the Capital Expenditures Committee voted 5-0-1 in favor of the Article. Sanjay Padaki,Vice-Chair of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee,by a vote of 8-0,supported passage of the Article. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 9:57 p.m. The Meeting was opened for discussion and debate including solar installations planned for the future. James Malloy,Town Manager,noted that the solar that had been considered had legs outside of the area. 10:05 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on Article 120. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 120—Municipal Parking Lot Improvements Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 162 3 7 MOTION CARRIES 10:08 P.M. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 12p. p) Public Parking Lot Improvement Program-$100,000 for the design and redesign of the Town's public parking lots,and that to meet this appropriation$100,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved balance; Douglas Lucente,Vice-Chair of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board voted the unanimous supported passage of the Article. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,said that the Capital Expenditures Committee unanimously supported the Article. Sanjay Padaki,Vice-Chair of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee, by a vote of 8-0,supported the Article. 10:09 p.m. The Meeting was opened for discussion and debate including questions regarding soil sampling in the area as well as design. Mr.Livsey,Town Engineer,stated that cores would be done of the asphalt and base. 10:19 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on Article 12p. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 12p—Public Parking Lot Improvement Program Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 146 15 10 MOTION CARRIES 10:22 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 12q. q) New Sidewalk Design-$75,000 for the survey and design of new sidewalks on Cedar Street, and that to meet this appropriation$75,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance; Douglas Lucente,Vice-Chair of the Select Board,stated that the Select Board had unanimously supported passage of the Article. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,said that the Capital Expenditures Committee unanimously supported the Article. Sanjay Padaki,Vice-Chair of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee,by a vote of 8-0,supported passage of the Article. 10:23 p.m. The Meeting was opened for discussion and debate. 10:31 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on Article 12q. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 12a—New Sidewalk Desitin Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 159 5 6 MOTION CARRIES March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 10:33 p.m. Ms.Jill Hai, Select Board Chair,Motioned to Adjourn the Annual Town Meeting to 7:30 p.m.Wednesday,April 6,2022,such meeting to be held remotely. As there were no objections,the Moderator declared that Motion adopted and the Meeting adjourned. April 6,2022 Adiourned Session of the 2022 Annual Town Meeting Moderator Deborah Brown called the fourth session of 2022 Annual Town Meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.on Wednesday,April 6,2022.The meeting was held remotely as voted by order of the Select Board and request of the Moderator. 7:30 p.m. Attendance was taken and the Portal was kept open while the Moderator gave notes on participation from the public and how to access the website to submit a statement for or against an Article. 7:35 p.m. The Moderator noted that as quorum had been reached,the Portal should be closed,and they would move forward with a Memorial for David Kaufman,who had passed away on February 8,2022 at the age of 87. The Moderator said that Mr.Kaufman's death had come as a surprise to many other Members as he continued to be active during the Fall 2021,Special Town Meeting and on the Town Meeting Members email list,and had given an impassioned talk on climate change to his neighbors at Brookhaven two weeks before his passing. Mr.Kaufman was born in Newburyport,Massachusetts,which was the closest town with a hospital near his family's home in Amesbury. His father taught math at the Junior High School in Amesbury,but with the advent of WWII,he volunteered for the Aircorps,where he was assigned to teach maps and charts,first in Montgomery,AL, and then to several other assignments throughout the South. This was the beginning of a pivotal period in David's childhood that impacted him in two major ways. First,his family moved so frequently,and he changed schools so often,that sometimes he would simply not enroll in school at all,but spent time reading textbooks on his own. This may have planted the seeds of his lifelong reading habit. David's wife,Harriet,said that he was a daily voracious reader,but that he only read science journals,newspapers,and reference books,not novels or fiction. The other major impact of those years in the South was his daily observations of segregation and racism. One particular memory never left him,of a black man pay his fare at the front of the public bus,then walk around to the outside of the bus to enter the from the rear door,only to have the door shut in his face,leaving him on the curb as the bus driver drove away with his fare. When the war ended,David's family moved back to Massachusetts,where David attended Malden High School,where he was Vice-President of the Green Room Dramatic Society,News Editor of the school newspaper,celebrated in the Boston Globe as one of the top science talent winners in the nation,and graduated as Salutorian of his class. He went on to MIT,where he earned a Bachelor's and Master's degrees in Electrical Engineering,while working part-time on radar,semi-conductors,computers, and what his younger brother,Roger,characterized as"exotic classified stuff at the Air Force Cambridge Research Center". Roger further noted that when David graduated,Amar Bose wanted him to come work for him as Chief Engineer in a new startup developing sound systems. Instead,David became a limited partner helping Bernie Gordon found several companies such as Gordon Engineering,Analogies,and Data Precision. David worked for each of these companies as a Senior Project Engineer designing and directing the development of digital voltmeters,analog to digital converters,computer control test systems,frequency counters,and other electronic gadgets. When David was a senior at MIT,he had attended a family wedding where he met a high school senior named Harriet,and they discovered that they shared the same birthday,although 4 years apart. Although they did not see each other for a while after March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. the wedding,they reconnected in 1964 when Harriet was finishing her Master's at NYU. David came to New York to visit the World's Fair—and visited Harriet while he was there. This proved to be a momentous reunion,and they made frequent use of the air shuttle between Boston and New York on weekends. After a few months of the long distance relationship,they decided to marry. David liked to say they"had"to get married—the shuttle was going up in price from$14—to$16 each way. Harriet joined David in Massachusetts,first in Brookline,and soon after,Lexington,where they raised their two children,Emily and Joshua. The electronic"gadgets"David had helped design for the companies helped to make Bernie Gordon a billionaire and allowed David,at a young age,to become a consultant and devote the lion's share of his time and resources in helping others in his community. As many had noted,David embodied the Quaker adage,"Let your life speak". Some of the ways his life spoke volumes about his values were that he had many contributions to open space and recreation in Lexington,a long tenure as a conservation steward for Willard's Woods. Harriet said that no one knew Willard's Woods as well as David. He walked it daily with his dog,he picked up trash,and he cleared fallen trees and limbs with a chainsaw and hand saw. He and Harriet also gifted 3 acres of their property to the Town for conservation. David worked on climate change and numerous Democratic campaigns,and was involved with the Lexington Democratic Committee,where for years,he,Harriet,and neighbors hosted the LTDC picnic in their adjoining backyards. David also worked tirelessly as a volunteer webmaster for Esterbrook Elementary School,long after his children had been students there,as well as for the Town Meeting Members Association and other organizations. He was a volunteer in many capacities at Open Table,an organization which was founded by Harriet,and the mission to end hunger in the local community by providing healthy food in ways that respect the dignity and diversity of those served. He also shared his time,money,and technical expertise in many ways to help others,and for over 30 years in Lexington,he was an active,well informed and well prepared intelligent contributor to Town Meeting. Harriet described him as very single minded in his focus during Town Meeting season— always reading and responding to every email in preparing for every session. The Moderator noted that it was hard to imagine Town Meeting without him,and offered sincere condolences to Harriet,Emily,and Joshua,his brother Roger,and their extended family. A moment of silence was held to honor his memory. 7:42 p.m. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,noted that he wished to correct the record of their vote on the recent amended Article 12a. The correct vote should be noted as 6-0. 7:43 p.m. The Moderator then called for a procedural motion in order to take up Articles 27,28, 26,and stated that Article 31 would be taken up at a later date. Ms.Hai, Select Board Chair,moved that the Town Meeting take up Articles 27,28,26. As there was no objection,the motion carried. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 27. MOTION: Janet Kern,Pct. 1,moves that, WHEREAS,the Town of Lexington generates over 9000 tons of trash annually,which is incinerated at the Wheelabrator Incinerator in North Andover with residual ash disposed of at the Ash Landfill in Shrewsbury;and WHEREAS, burning waste and burying toxic ash have the following impacts: causing damage to human health and the environment, wasting natural resources, generating greenhouse gases, contributing to the loss of biodiversity, and wrongly transferring health and environmental harms to other communities and future generations;and WHEREAS,the detrimental impacts of Lexington's waste disposal are exacerbated by the incineration facility and ash landfill being located adjacent to financially disadvantaged, minority, and English March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. isolated populations,who face disproportionate environmental burdens and are at disproportionate risk for negative health outcomes,i.e.,"Environmental Justice communities—,and WHEREAS,food waste makes up at least 25%,and thus the biggest component,of residential waste; and WHEREAS,food waste is composed of mostly water and burning it requires additional fuel to be used,making waste hauling and incineration even less efficient and more polluting;and WHEREAS, since FY 2016,the cost of Lexington's waste incineration has increased by 20% and the cost of curbside recycling has increased by 80%;and WHEREAS,Lexington's contract for solid waste disposal expires in June 2023 and the next contract would potentially commit the town to waste disposal practices through June 2028. WHEREAS, MassDEP projects that in-state landfill capacity for solid waste will decline to nearly zero by 2028,making source reduction and diversion efforts even more urgent;and WHEREAS,the state's"2030 Solid Waste Master Plan:Working Together Toward Zero Waste"has set a goal to reduce the state's total solid waste from a 2018 baseline by 30%by 2030 and 90%by 2050;and WHEREAS,The Town has adopted multiple policies and resolutions that recognize and take action on threats to our environment,human health and racial justice,in particular: 2013: Lexington Town Meeting adopted a Climate Change Resolution to consider climate change in all appropriate decisions. 2016:Lexington Public Schools contract for compost pickup in all nine schools. 2018: The Board of Selectmen adopted the Sustainable Action Plan and Getting to Net Zero Emissions Plan. 2020: Lexington Town Meeting approved a resolution endorsing the declaration of a climate emergency. 2020:Lexington Town Meeting adopted a Systemic Racism Resolution. WHEREAS,these resolutions and policies taken together reflect the values of our community with respect to sustainability and environmental justice;and WHEREAS,the Guiding Principles of Zero Waste(`Zero Waste")are: •preserving natural resources by means of responsible production and consumption, •conserving natural resources through waste prevention; •promoting reusable products and the use of materials(glass,metal,etc.)that are durable, reusable and made from non-toxic materials; •reducing the use of single-use,non-recyclable products and materials; •treating waste as a resource, •regenerating natural resources through composting and recycling, 7:44 p.m. A presentation was given by Ms.Hien Nguyen regarding the Zero Waste Resolution Citizens Petition. 7:51 p.m. Joe Pato, Select Board Member,stated that the Select Board had 3 members in support and 2 members abstaining. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Kathy Lenihan, School Committee Chair,noted the unanimous support of the School Committee. The Moderator also noted that there were letters of support from the Board of Health, Sustainable Lexington,and Lexington Waste Reduction Taskforce on the website. 7:52 p.m. The Meeting was opened for discussion and debate. 7:53 p.m. Robert Peters,Pct. 7,noted that years ago contracts with Wheelabrator required an annual minimum tonnage for incineration or the Town received extra fees. David Pinsonneault,Director of Public Works,stated that this had not been the case in the last 5-6 years. 7:56 p.m. Judith Glixon,2 Aerial St.,asked Members to support the Article. 7:58 p.m. Mark Andersen,Pct.9,asked that the question of environmental justice be further discussed. Ms.Nguyen noted that the Resolution sought to address waste by focusing on upstream solutions that conserve valuable material resources,but noted that it was recognized that minimizing impact on environmental justice communities might unfortunately mean that the remainder of the waste was still sent to incinerators that affected their communities. 8:04 p.m. Richard LaRoche, 18 Seaborn Place,urged meeting Members to adopt the Resolution. 8:09 p.m. Kayla Schechter,52 Liberty Ave.,stated that she was a 12 year old who was concerned with the environment and asked Members to vote yes on the Resolution. Members continued to debate the Article and possible alternatives to waste such as composting.. 8:21 p.m. Dawn McKenna,Pct. 6,called the question. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Terminate Debate Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 115 47 16 MOTION CARRIES 8:24 p.m. Ms.Nguyen offered summary comments on the urgency of the Town to take action to adopt zero waste principles. 8:25 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on Article 27. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 27-Zero Waste Resolution Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 170 4 8 MOTION CARRIES 8:29 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 28. (Approved by the Attorney General's Office August 1,2022,with disapproval of text in 9-7(C)non-criminal disposition—strikethrough in red) MOTION: Mr.Patel moves that Chapter 9 of the Code of the Town of Lexington be amended by adding the following Section 9-7: §9-7 Pet Shops. A. Terms Used in this Section 9-7. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. "Pet shop"means a retail establishment where animals are sold or offered for sale as pets which is required to be licensed pursuant to M.G.L. c. 129 §39A and 330 CMR 12.00.A person who only sells or otherwise transfers the offspring of animals the person has bred on their residential premises shall not be considered a"pet shop"for purposes of this section. "Sell"means to exchange for consideration,adopt out,barter,auction,trade,lease,or otherwise transfer for consideration. "Offer for sale"means to advertise or otherwise proffer an animal for acceptance by another person or entity. "Public animal control agency or shelter"means a facility operated by a governmental entity,for the purpose of impounding seized,stray,homeless,abandoned,unwanted,or surrendered animals,or a facility operated for the same purposes under a written contract with a governmental entity. "Animal rescue organization"means a not-for-profit organization that is registered with the Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources,if required,and whose mission and practice is, in whole or in significant part,the rescue and placement of dogs,cats,or rabbits into permanent homes.The term"animal rescue organization"does not include any person or entity that breeds animals or obtains animals in exchange for payment or compensation from a person that breeds or brokers animals. B. Sale of Dogs,Cats,or Rabbits by Pet Shops Prohibited. (1)It shall be unlawful for a pet shop to sell or offer for sale a dog,cat,or rabbit. (2)A pet shop may provide space for the display of dogs,cats,or rabbits available for adoption by a public animal control agency or shelter or an animal rescue organization so long as the pet shop receives no part of any fees associated with the display or adoption of the animals and has no ownership interest in any of the animals displayed or made available for adoption. C. Enforcement and Severability. ,4 all 4e lrn..arr arw 11 oim1RH 4� e�ieee(� S300I)HiuiHairl 4�Qw 1.: e 401: §2 1 W Lural§ I i'r art- ars rr (m o(Be oA ivlas k-i., Each unlawful sale or offer for sale shall constitute a separate violation. (2)In addition to any other remedy provided by law,this Chapter may be enforced through any other means available in law or equity.Nothing in this Chapter may be construed to alter or amend any other legal obligations applicable to pet shops,or any other entities,under state law or regulation. (3)The invalidity of any section or provision of this Chapter shall not invalidate any other section or provision thereof. 8:29 p.m. Ms.Pam Baker, 106 Kendall Road,gave a presentation on the Article. 8:37 p.m. Suzanne Barry, Select Board Member,stated the unanimous support of the Select Board. The Moderator noted that the Board of Health had posted a letter of support on the website. 8:38 p.m. Avram Baskin,Pct.2,asked if there were ever an ethical puppy farm. Ms.Baker stated that there were ethical breeders,but noted she was unsure how"puppy farm"was being defined. Town Meeting Members and members of the public voiced support of the Article. 8:54 p.m. Dawn McKenna,Pct. 6,called the question. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Terminate Debate Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 137 31 13 MOTION CARRIES 8:56 p.m. For final comments,Ms.Baker noted that she was very heartened by the overwhelmingly positive response and thanked Members for their support. 8:57 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on Article 28. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 28-Humane Pet Store Bvlaw Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 177 2 5 MOTION CARRIES 9:00 P.M. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 26. MOTION: Mr. Daggett moves that the Town appropriate $75,000 for the funding of two nexus studies to guide the implementation of a residential development linkage fee, as defined by special legislation resulting from Special Town Meeting 2020-2 Article 6, and a commercial development linkage fee, as defined by special legislation resulting from Annual Town Meeting 2021 Article 36; and that to meet this appropriation $75,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance. Provided,that said funds may only be expended after special legislation permitting one or both linkage fees has been enacted by the Massachusetts General Court and signed by the Governor. 9:01 p.m. Mr.Daggett presented information on Nexus Studies. 9:10 p.m. Mark Sandeen,Vice-Chair of the Select Board,stated the unanimous support of the Select Board for passage of the Article Anil Ahuja,Member of the Appropriations Committee,stated that by a vote of 8-0,the Appropriations Committee was unanimous in their support of the Article. Meeting Members discussed the Motion. 9:27 p.m. Dawn McKenna,Pct. 6,called the question. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Terminate Debate Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 110 55 12 MOTION CARRIES 9:28 p.m. Mr.Daggett thanked Members for their questions during the process and stated that the study would give important information not found elsewhere and help the Select Board to set rates and implementation. 9:29 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on Article 26. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 26-Nexus Studies Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 168 12 4 MOTION CARRIES 9:32 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 16,items g and h.and noted they would be opened together,but voted separately. 9:33 p.m. Rita Goldberg,Pct.2,raised a Point of Order that too many people were using the portal and she was unable to vote. The Moderator noted that if that happened,Members were able to use the"raise hand"feature and she would take the vote verbally. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 9:34 p.m. Mr.Lucente moved Articles 16g and h. g) High School Equipment Emergency Funds-$500,000 for extraordinary repairs and modifications to building systems and equipment at Lexington High School,and all incidental costs related thereto,and that to meet this appropriation the Treasurer,with the approval of the Select Board,is authorized to borrow$500,000 under M.G.L.Chapter 44,Section 7(1),or any other enabling authority; Michael Cronin,Director of Public Facilities,presented information on Article 16g. Douglas Lucente,Vice-Chair of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board unanimously supported passage of the Article. Kathy Lenihan, School Committee Chair,stated the unanimous support of the School Committee. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,said that the Capital Expenditures Committee unanimously supported the Article. Glenn Parker,Chair of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee recommended approval of the Article by a vote of 8-0. He further noted that this was an unusual request in that it was a debt authorization,unlike most appropriations that were made. 9:38 p.m. The Meeting was opened for discussion and debate on Article 16g. As there were no questions,the Moderator opened voting on Article 16g. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 162—High School Equipment Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 171 2 5 MOTION CARRIES WITH MORE THAN NECESSARY 2/3RDS 9:42 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting on Article 16h. h) Town Pool Water Heater Replacement-$31,000 for design and engineering of a replacement for the water heater for the sinks and showers at the Town Pool facility,and all incidental costs related thereto,and that to meet this appropriation$31,000 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance. Christian Boutwell,Recreation Committee Member,gave a Presentation regarding the Article. Mr. Boutwell noted that the Recreation Committee unanimously recommended passage of the Article. 9:44 p.m. The Meeting was opened for discussion and debate. 9:45 p.m. Dawn McKenna,Pct. 6,stated that she was opposed to the Article as the Recreation Enterprise Fund was supposed to cover things that were based on a fee based program, which the pool was and that in prior years,Recreation had to compete for funds,but once the Enterprise Fund was set up,all programs would be done through it,while things like playgrounds,which weren't fee based,would come out of the tax levy. She said that more and more things were being put into the tax levy,and she would vote no as a protest of this and that Recreation should keep within their budget. 9:47 p.m. Umesh Shelat,Pct. 7,noted that while he was in favor of alternative fuel sources,he wasn't sure if that was the right alternative for heating a pool. Charles Lamb,Capital Expenditures Committee,noted that the Article was for heating showers and sinks,and not the pool. Kenneth Shine,Pct.2,said that in the presentation there had been a mention of when the system was installed and that it had a 10-year life span and asked for clarification if the system weren't working or in need of replacement,or whether it was at a theoretical end of life. Michael Cronin,Director of Public Facilities,noted that the heater had been placed in 2013 and had an expected life expectancy of 10 years. They had evaluated the March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. equipment,and that while it hadn't failed it was showing significant wear and tear and they anticipated needing to replace it in the next year or so and were hoping that it wouldn't fail during the pool season. Mr. Shine asked whether there were other methods of heating water that were used in other parts of the Town. Mr.Cronin stated that there were and they would look at all options including electric as they were hoping to move away from fossil fuels. 9:52 p.m. Andrei Radulescu-Banu,Pct. 8,noted that the source of funding was free cash and wondered if it could be paid with CPA funds.Mina Makarious,Town Counsel,said that it would be a close call,as though it was a recreational use,it was for indoor use which wasn't allowed. Meeting members continued discussion. 10:00 p.m. Noah Michelson,Pct. 1,called the question. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Terminate Debate Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 130 29 16 MOTION CARRIES 10:03 p.m. As Mr.Lucerne declined summary comments,the Moderator opened voting on Article 16h. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 16h—Town Pool Water Heater Replacement Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 161 9 4 MOTION CARRIES 10:06 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 19 ARTICLE 19 ESTABLISH,AMEND,DISSOLVE AND APPROPRIATE TO AND FROM SPECIFIED STABILIZATION FUNDS MOTION: Mr. Sandeen moves that: a) That$800,000 be appropriated from the Capital Stabilization Fund for projects excluded from the limits of Proposition 2'/z;and b) That$3,142,434 be appropriated into the Capital Stabilization Fund,and to meet this appropriation,$57,138 be appropriated from the tax levy and$3,085,296 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance;and c) That$107,554 be appropriated into the Transportation Management Overlay District Stabilization Fund,and to meet this appropriation,$107,554 be appropriated from the Transportation Management Overlay District Special Revenue Fund. Mark Sandeen,Member of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board unanimously supported passage of the Article. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,said that the Capital Expenditures Committee unanimously recommended passage of all 3 parts of the Article. Alan Levine,Member of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee unanimously in support of all 3 parts of the Article. As there were no questions,the Moderator opened voting on Article 19 and noted that it would require a 2/3 vote. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 19—Stabilization Funds Adopted by a vote of: March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Yes No Abstain 169 1 4 MOTION CARRIES WITH MORE THAN NECESSARY 2/3RDS 10:12 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 21 ARTICLE 21 AMEND FY2022 OPERATING,ENTERPRISE AND CPA BUDGETS MOTION: Mr.Pato moves a) That the following adjustments be made to the following line items for the FY2022 budget as approved under Article 4 of the 2021 Annual Town Meeting: Line Item Pro ram From To 2510 Reserve Fund 750,000 924,000 8500 Town Clerk Personal Services 404,181 422,892 8500 Town Clerk Expenses $ 98,250 $ 123,988 and further,that to meet this appropriation$44,449 be appropriated from the General Fund unreserved fund balance,and$174,000 be transferred from the Recreation Enterprise Fund. b) That the following adjustments be made to the estimated receipts reserved for FY2022 as recommended by the Community Preservation Committee,and approved under Article 10 of the 2021 Annual Town Meeting: From To For the acquisition,creation and reservation of o ens ace 743,000 822,026 For the acquisition,preservation,rehabilitation and restoration of historic resources $ 743,000 $ 822,026 For the acquisition,creation,preservation and support of communitv housin2 $ 743,000 $ 822,026 To the Unbud eted Reserve 5,201,000 5,7 183 Joe Pato,Member of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board unanimously supported passage of the Article. Glenn Parker,Chair of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee unanimously recommended approval of the Article. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,said that the Capital Expenditures Committee unanimously supported the Article. Marilyn Fenollosa,Chair of the Community Preservation,stated unanimous support of the Community Preservation Committee for part"b"of the Article. As there were no questions,the Moderator opened voting on Article 21. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 21—Amend FY2022 Operating,Enterprise and CPA Budgets Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 166 1 1 MOTION CARRIES 10:13 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 24. Suzanne Barry,Member of the Select Board noted that she would be recused from the Article as her husband was an employee of the Town of Lexington. MOTION:Mr. Cunha moves that the base amount upon which cost of living adjustments are calculated for retirees be raised from$14,000 to$15,000 as authorized by M.G.L.Chapter 32,Section 1030). March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 10:14 p.m. Robert Cunha,Retirement Board Chair,gave a presentation on Article 24. Doug Lucente,Member of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board had 4 members in support,with one member recused(Barry). Anil Ahuja,Member of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee had voted 8-0 in recommending approval of the Article. 10:19 p.m. The Moderator opened the floor for discussion and debate. Fran Strod,Pct.6,asked for clarification on an amount of$30 on one of the slides. Mr. Cunha said that the amount was increase from$420 to$450 for retirees. 10:20 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on Article 24. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 24—Adjust COLA Base for Retirees Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 166 1 4 MOTION CARRIES 10:23 p.m. After the voting process,the Moderator asked Ms.Hai for a motion to adjourn and reminded the Meeting Members that on the 11ffi, Special Town Meeting#2 would also be taken up and named the upcoming Articles for the Meeting and the amendment deadline. She also noted that a Motion was available on the website for Article 3 on STM#2 and for Article 34 on the Annual Town Meeting. 10:24 p.m. Ms.Jill Hai, Select Board Chair,Motioned to Adjourn the Annual Town Meeting to Monday,April 11,2022,such meeting to be held remotely. As there were no objections,the Moderator declared that Motion adopted and the Meeting adjourned. April 11,2022 Adiourned Session of the 2022 Annual Town Meetinu Moderator Deborah Brown called the fifth session of 2022 Annual Town Meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.on Monday,April 11,2022.The meeting was held remotely as voted by order of the Select Board and request of the Moderator. 7:31 p.m. The Moderator declared the Annual Town Meeting to be in recess. April 11,2022 Special Town Meeting#2(2022-2) Moderator Deborah Brown called to order Special Town Meeting#2 at 7:31 p.m.,Monday,April 11, 2022. The 2022 Special Town Meeting#2 was held remotely as voted by order of the Select Board and request of the Moderator.The meeting was held remotely using a virtual platform that was developed by Select Board member Joseph Pato.Electronic voting was conducted via the platform and results were reported on the Town's website as per usual practice. Town Clerk,Mary de Alderete,read the Warrant for the Special Town Meeting#2 until waived.The Town Clerk then read the Constable's Return of Service. The Moderator asked that Town Meeting Members register their attendance in the portal and noted that if anyone had technical difficulties,to call the technical support number. 7:32 p.m. Charles Lamb,Pct.4,noted that he did not have his login but wanted to register that he was present. Also registering by voice were Katherine Reynolds,Pct. 1,Dawn McKenna,Pct. 6,and Al Zabin,Pct. 1. The Moderator stated that she would leave the portal open while she gave some general information to those members of the public who were attending via cable tv or the online through LexMedia and who might wish to log comments or a statement through the Town Meeting website. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 7:35 p.m. The Moderator stated that a quorum had been achieved and declared the Meeting open under Article 1. ARTICLE 1 REPORTS OF TOWN BOARDS,OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES a. Report of the Town Manager MOTION: That the report of the Town Manager be received and placed on file. IL. Reports of the Appropriation Committee MOTION: That the reports of the Appropriation Committee be received and placed on file. c. Reports of the Capital Expenditures Committee MOTION: That the reports of the Capital Expenditures Committee be received and placed on file. d. Report of the Select Board MOTION: That the report of the Select Board be received and placed on file. e.Report of the Planning Board MOTION: That the report of the Planning Board be received and placed on file. L Report of the School Committee MOTION: That the report of the School Committee be received and placed on file. The Moderator stated that she would like a Motion to receive the Capital Expenditures Report for STM#2022-2,which was part of the consolidated report from the Annual Town Meeting and Special Town Meeting#2022-1. Mr.Lamb moved that the Capital Expenditures Report be received and placed on file. As there were no objections,the Motion carried. The Moderator stated that she would like a Motion to receive the Appropriations Committee Report for STM#2022-2,which was part of the consolidated report from the Annual Town Meeting and Special Town Meeting#2022-1. Mr.Parker moved that the Appropriations Committee Report be received and placed on file. As there were no objections,the Motion carried. 7:36 p.m. The Moderator declared the Meeting open under Article 2. MOTION:Ms.Lenihan moves that the Town appropriate the amount of one million eight hundred twenty-five thousand($1,825,000)dollars for the purpose of paying costs of the feasibility study for the Lexington High School located at 251 Waltham St,Lexington,MA 02421,including the payment of all costs incidental or related thereto,and for which the Town may be eligible for a grant from the Massachusetts School Building Authority("MSBA"),said amount to be expended under the direction of the School Building Committee.To meet this appropriation the Treasurer,with the approval of the Select Board is authorized to borrow said amount under and pursuant to M.G.L. Chapter 44,or pursuant to any other enabling authority.The Town acknowledges that the MSBA's grant program is a non- entitlement,discretionary program based on need,as determined by the MSBA,and any costs the Town incurs in excess of any grant approved by and received from the MSBA shall be the sole responsibility of the Town,and that the amount of borrowing authorized pursuant to this vote shall be reduced by any grant amount set forth in the Feasibility Study Agreement that may be executed between the Town and the MSBA. Michael Cronin,Director of Public Facilities,gave a presentation on the Article including noting the process,estimated cost,schedule,eligibility factors. 7:41 p.m. Kathy Lenihan,Chair of the School Committee,stated the unanimous support of the School Committee for passage of the Article. Jill Hai,Chair of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board unanimously supported passage of the Article. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee,said that the Capital Expenditures Committee unanimously recommended approval of the Article. Alan Levine,Member of the Appropriation Committee,stated that the Appropriation Committee voted 8-0 in recommending approval of the Article. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 7:42 p.m. The Meeting was opened for discussion and debate. Kathryn Colburn,Pct.4,questioned a comment regarding the feasibility study encompassing all of the work that was contemplated by Article 25,and specifically whether the feasibility study would cover issues of siting the new high school. Mr. Cronin noted that the scope of work for the feasibility study would look at siting the new high school,and they would look at the existing site and whether the land currently being used could be renovated or added to in order to satisfy the requirements of the program and students,or if an alternate site,perhaps in the same location,would be evaluated. He said that there were 54 acres being evaluated. Mr.Lamb was recognized in order to give clarification that Article 25 contemplates the sort of work that the Working Group would be performing,and there was some question of whether that Working Group would have the funds that would have been appropriated by Article 25,so to clarify his earlier statement,the Working Group would have sufficient funds to address the issues that Article 25 contemplated. Ms. Colburn asked for clarification on whether the mentioned 54 acre site included only the high school or the Center Recreation Complex,as well. Mr. Cronin stated that the 54 acre site was inclusive of the entire green space area from the pool,the tennis courts,Worthen Ave.to Lexington Street. Ms. Colburn asked Mr.Lamb to clarify whether the funds being appropriated for the feasibility study would also go toward the work of the Working Group.Mr.Lamb stated that this was his understanding. 7:46 p.m. Jonathan Himmel,Pct. 6,stated that as the maker of Article 25,he was thrilled that the process was finally happening. Suzanne Lau,Pct.9,asked whether there was an intention to look at sites outside of the acreage already mentioned. Mr. Cronin said that as part of the MSBA process they would look at all available sites within the Town. Ms.Lau noted that the site seemed to have significant challenges in terms of constructing a high school of a size they were discussing,while still managing to keep the school open at the same time. 7:48 p.m. Robert Creech,Pct. 7,asked if the feasibility study would also discuss different ideas such as rethinking how to accommodate a greater number of students. Mr. Cronin stated that they would look at all of the programmatic requirements including educational content and how it would be delivered. Dr.Hackett agreed that they would discuss different ideas—first through the Working Group and also through the MSBA process,which was lengthy,and gave them the time to talk about every option including identifying the type of building based on the educational space needs. Mr.Creech said the he wanted to ensure that space wasn't an issue 5 years after the school was built,so wanted to ask that there were"no options off the table"in terms of creative ways to be able to expand,if necessary. 7:50 p.m. Avram Baskin,Pct.2,asked whether there were other sites that would be suitable for a high school besides the current site and whether a few examples could be given.Mr. Cronin stated that through the Master Plan process they would look at variety of properties in Town,but noted that the high school was not just the building but also the track,fields,and associated green space that has to be on the same site,and noted that properties with those aspects would be small in number. Mr.Baskin stated that it sounded as if everything was planned to be on one site,but asked if it be in two different places. Mr. Cronin stated that they would work with the MSBA to explore all options during the feasibility process,but noted that getting students from one place to another would have to be discussed. Dr.Hackett mentioned that there would be a Master Plan Compendium with identified tracks of land and they had looked at places such as golf courses and country clubs,but as Mr. Cronin had stated,it was worked out through the process. 7:55 p.m. Taylor Singh,Pct.6,asked whether it was foreseen that all 270 days allowable in the eligibility process would be used,or if the next step could be sooner. Dr.Hackett said that it was standard to take the 9 months in the eligibility phase,where there would be perhaps more flexibility later with things such as selection of the architect,but noted that it seemed realistic that they would use the 9 months. Ms. Singh asked when ground breaking could be expected. Dr.Hackett said that while it depended,they were looking March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. at 2027-2028. Mr. Cronin followed up by stating that September of 2027-2028 was the targeted move in dates,so 2025-2026 would be anticipated ground breaking,but the only defined dates were for the eligibility phase,and noted that the MSBA hadn't invited them into Phases 2,3,or 4,so those dates might be changed based on their requirements. 7:57 p.m. Delanot Bastien,Pct.3,stated that he was concerned that this was a large project and would bring about possible stress on students including worry about construction traffic, and urged the Committee to carefully take this into consideration. Mr. Cronin agreed that safety measures would be taken for staff and students and that this was a part of their process. Dr.Hackett agreed and said she shared his concern and having gone through a large project before,noted that it could be a difficult and challenging. Members continued to discuss the Article. 8:05 p.m. Robert Balaban,Pct. 5,asked for a description of the final approval process of the feasibility study. Dr.Hackett said that once the feasibility study happens,the Mass School Building Authority Board took a vote to authorize the Executive Director to begin working on a funding agreement with the community and then the community for a vote. She said that the MSBA had two large votes,one to invite to the feasibility study,and the second for funding. Mr.Balaban asked who would sign off on the submission of feasibility study. Dr.Hackett noted that they would be responding to the process of the MSBA and recommendations would be made for a preferred schematic design to the Executive Director and the Board,and they controlled the process and their decision as to where they put funding,and that if the Town wanted funding,they needed to follow that process.Mr. Cronin noted that it was a coordinated effort between the MSBA and the Town and as they would be joined throughout the process and issues such as space requirements,siting,and program would be addressed long before it was finalized. 8:14 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on Article 2 and noted it required a 2/3 vote. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: STM 2022-2 Article 2—High School Feasibilitv Studv Yes No Abstain 177 1 2 MOTION CARRIES WITH MORE THAN NECESSARY 2/3RDS 8:18 p.m. The Moderator declared the Meeting open under Article 3. ARTICLE 3 AMEND GENERAL BYLAW TO ALLOW REMOTE PARTICIPATION AT HYBRID TOWN MEETINGS MOTION: Mr. Pato moves that Chapter 118 of the Code of the Town of Lexington be amended as set forth below,and further that non-substantive changes to the numbering of this bylaw be permitted in order that it be in compliance with the numbering format of the Code of the Town of Lexington: 1. Modify Section 118-18 as follows(additions underlined) §118-18 Quorum. A. The presence of 100 members at a Town meeting for the transaction of business shall be required to constitute a quorum, except for a motion to adjourn for which no quorum shall be required;provided,however,that no vote carrying the expenditure or appropriation of any sum of money shall be held to be invalid by reason of lack of the required quorum, unless it appears from the records of the Town Clerk of the meeting that before the result of such vote was declared the question of the presence of a quorum was duly raised and that such record shows that the required quorum was lacking. and B. At least 90 members shall be present at the physical location identified in the warrant for the meeting. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 2.Add anew Section 118-20 as follows: §118-20 Remote Participation at Town Meetings. A. Hybrid Town Meeting A hybrid Town Meeting is one where participants may attend the meeting in person or remotely via an audio or video conferencing system. B. Remote Participants If a hybrid meeting is held,Town Meeting Members may participate remotely with the same privileges and responsibilities as if those Members were attending the Meeting in person. C. Operating Rules (1) After a public hearing,the Moderator,in consultation with the Select Board,and the Town Clerk,is authorized to define operating rules governing the operation of a hybrid Town Meeting. The operating rules shall include procedures for: a) Audio and visual communications during the meeting, b) Determining if a quorum is present, c) Requesting and being recognized to speak or offer a point of order, d) Voting,and e) Participation by members of the public,staff,and other interested parties who are not Town Meeting Members. (2) A Hybrid Town Meeting and its corresponding operating rules must be authorized by a two- thirds majority vote of Town Meeting. (a) Such authorization may occur at a session of any Town Meeting, including one proposed to be held as a Hybrid Town Meeting,but must occur before the electronic system is used for any other business of the meeting. (b) The Hybrid Town Meeting operating rules shall remain in effect for all subsequent Hybrid Town Meetings unless a petition signed by 40 or more members is submitted to the Moderator asking to reconsider the operating rules; or changes to the operating rules are requested by the Moderator in accordance with the procedures in Subsection 118-20(C)(1). In either event, authorization for use of the electronic system must again be put to a two-thirds majority vote of Town Meeting. 8:19 p.m. Mr.Pato gave a presentation on the Hybrid and Remote Access Articles,explaining the process and required legislative authorizations. 8:24 p.m. Joe Pato, Select Board Member,noted the unanimous support of the Select Board for the Article. The Meeting was opened for discussion and debate. Sanjay Padaki,Pct. 8,noted that there was a reference to possible requirements of technology,and wanted to know if that would need to come before Town Meeting for appropriation,or a part of a budget already in place. Mr.Pato stated that there was no allocated funding for a system. Mr.Padaki asked if when the procedures were completed,whether the Attorney General or the State would need to approve them. Mr. Pato said that approval of the operating procedures would be the responsibility of Town Meeting. 8:25 p.m. Avram Baskin,Pct.2,asked if everything went well,would they still be facing 1-2 in which Town Meeting would have to be fully remote as it hadn't been voted. Mr.Pato stated that the current emergency legislation which allowed fully remote meetings would expire in July and if a system for hybrid meetings wasn't available,they would need to meet in person. 8:26 p.m. Sue Kingsbury,Pct.9,stated that meeting remotely was not in the spirit of Town Meeting and they should be gathering in person at Town Meeting in order be better engaged. 8:29 p.m. David Kanter,Pct. 7,noted that he was concerned with 90 person quorum that would be in the Cary Memorial Building. He said that the survey taken had reflected a strong interest in hybrid meetings and democracy seemed to be better served in terms of participation as there were higher attendance numbers with remote meetings,and asked why,with that background,the focus was bent toward in-person participation. Mr.Pato March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. stated the reason for a hybrid meeting was to provide a mechanism for those with some challenge to attend and participate fully in the meeting. At this stage,the hybrid meeting was not intended for the majority of Town Meeting Members to attend remotely,and as a result the Motion that the Select Board had brought forward based the minimum quorum to be at least 90 in person to reflect the intention that most Members attended in person. If at a future time,the Special Act that was being requested were passed,it could be revisited to provide fully remote possibilities. Mr.Kanter asked that the Select Board consider that getting higher participation assisted in the cause of democracy. 8:30 p.m. Meeting Members continued to discuss and debate the Motion including access for the public,proposed quorum requirements,inclusion and equity considerations. 8:47 p.m. Dawn McKenna,Pct. 6,called the question. 8:48 p.m. Bridger McGaw,Pct.6,raised a Point of Order asking whether due to the nature of discussion in regards to democracy,debate should be allowed to continue. The Moderator stated that that Ms.McKenna had made the motion and it was appropriate as the debate had continued from 8:18 p.m.to 8:48 p.m.,it was in the usual parameters and she would allow the vote to terminate debate to continue,but that Town Meeting Members could make the decision by voting for or against closing debate. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Terminate Debate Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 96 71 13 MOTION CARRIES 8:52 p.m. The Moderator asked for summary comments from Mr.Pato.Mr.Pato thanked Town Meeting Members for their attention. The Moderator then opened voting on Article 3. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: STM 2022-2 Article 3—Amend General Bvlaw to Allow Remote Participation at Hybrid Town Meetings Yes No Abstain 166 10 5 MOTION CARRIES 8:57 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 4. ARTICLE 4 APPROPRIATE FOR COMPLETING THE TOWN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MOTION:Mr.Creech moves that the Town appropriate$75,000 for the purpose of completing the Town's comprehensive plan,and that to meet this appropriation$75,000 be raised in the tax levy. Robert Creech,Planning Board Member,offered a presentation on behalf of the Planning Board in regards to Article 4 and noted a vote of 5-0 by the Planning Board in unanimous support of the Article. Mark Sandeen, Select Board Vice-President,stated the unanimous support of the Select Board for approval of the Article. Glenn Parker,Appropriations Committee Chair,stated that the Appropriations Committee had voted 7-1 in support of the Article. 9:00 p.m. The Meeting was opened for discussion and debate. As there was no one standing,the Moderator opened the Meeting for voting on Article 4. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Appropriate for Completing the Town's Comprehensive Plan Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 167 2 9 March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. MOTION CARRIES 9:03 p.m. The Moderator asked Ms.Hai for a motion to dissolve Special Town Meeting 2022-2. Jill Hai,Select Board Chair moved to dissolve Special Town Meeting 2022-2.As there were no objections,motion unanimously carries. 9:04 p.m. Moderator Deborah Brown called the March 28,2022 Annual Town Meeting back to order and noted there would be a Memorial for Donald B.White, Sr.,who had passed away on January 2,2022 at the age of 92 in his South Dartmouth home,surrounded by family.His wife,Ellen,predeceased him. Don was born on October 1, 1929 in Woburn,where he grew up and attended Woburn High School, Don attended Tufts University where he graduated in 1951.After graduation,Don served with the Massachusetts National Guard and settled in Lexington. He worked for 50 years in industrial sales throughout the New England region specializing in hydraulics and pneumatics.He had an active civic life including involvement with the Lexington Jaycees,Lions International and American Red Cross, and Boy Scouts of America.He served as a Lexington Town Meeting member for many years during the 60's,70's,and 80's and was a member of the Town Appropriations Committee,including serving as Chair.During summers and then,retirement in South Dartmouth,he was active in the Bay View Water and Improvement Association,volunteered with Grace Episcopal Church in New Bedford,as well as other organizations involving waterways and his love of the sea.He also enthusiastically followed New England sports teams and was a strong supporter of his family's numerous athletic activities. The Moderator extended her deepest condolences to Don's large extended family,which included 7 children and their spouses,7 grandchildren and spouses and 1 great grandchild. A Moment of silence was held in Mr. White's honor. 9:06 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting on Article 34. ARTICLE 34:ALLOW FOR SELECT BOARD TO CALL REMOTE TOWN MEETING MOTION:Ms.Hai moves that the Select Board be authorized to petition the Massachusetts General Court to enact legislation in substantially the form below,and further that the Select Board be authorized to approve amendments to said legislation before its enactment by the General Court that are within the scope of the general objectives of this motion: AN ACT AUTHORIZING THE TOWN OF LEXINGTON TO ALLOW REMOTE PARTICIPATION AT TOWN MEETINGS Be it enacted as follows: SECTION 1. Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary,the Town of Lexington may,by bylaw,permit a representative town meeting to be held through remote participation or a hybrid of in-person and remote participation,including,but not limited to,by means of a video or telephone conferencing platform. All actions taken during a completely remote or hybrid remote town meeting held pursuant to this act shall have the same effect as if the town meeting had been conducted in person. SECTION 2. In addition to and without limiting the authority of the Lexington select board or moderator under this act or any other general or special law,the select board may declare that a session of town meeting called to be held either entirely in person or through a hybrid of in-person and remote participation shall be held entirely through remote participation in the event that,due to an emergency,no suitable town facility is available in the town of Lexington in accordance with the provisions of section l0A of chapter 39 of the general laws. The procedures of said Section l0A of chapter 39 shall apply to the change to an entirely remote meeting. 9:07 p.m. Select Board Member Joe Pato gave a presentation regarding Article 34,which authorized a Home Rule Petition to call remote or hybrid town meetings as specified in Town bylaws and noted it would allow future bylaw amendments to allow fully-remote meetings. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 9:09 p.m. Joe Pato, Select Board Member,stated that the Select Board had voted 4-1 regarding passage of the Article. The Meeting was opened for discussion and debate. Bridger McGaw,Pct. 6,asked if the Select Board envisioned capturing lessons learned regarding remote experience to produce a more comprehensive review to do better at remote sessions in the future. Mr.Pato noted that after each session,there had been a review of what went well,or didn't,and there wasn't currently a formal process to conduct the analysis proposed by Mr.McGaw. Mr.McGaw stated that it seemed with this formal step that the Town was committing the legislative process to an administrative burden in the future and believed there should be an analysis for how the staffing,preparation,engagement and execution of remote/hybrid Town Meetings in the future took place. Mr.Pato said that this made sense and would be taken under advisement. 9:12 p.m. Gang Chen,Pct. 8,asked that the results of the survey be shared. Mr.Pato said that the TMMA had conducted the survey and presented information to the Select Board at a meeting earlier in the year,and the information was available in the minutes.Mr. Chen asked for a general idea of percentage of support. Mr.Pato stated that he didn't have the information available. Mr.Chen asked for clarification of the in-person quorum requirement. Mr.Pato said that it had just been set in the prior bylaw for 90 Members to attend in person,but no bylaw currently existed to allow a fully remote Town Meeting. The Home Rule Petition would allow a future bylaw to do so,and that the Petition also allowed for the emergency provision to have a fully remote building if a facility wasn't available. The Moderator noted that she now had access to the data from the survey, and the result in regards to the first question regarding remote participation at the Meetings beginning on March 28th,74.5%preferred meeting remotely,25.5%in person,and in response to that,the reason behind the preference,with the number one reason being health concerns for other Town Meeting Members (68.7%). The third question regarding how likely Members would be to not attend if the Meeting were in person was 61%. The Moderator also discussed other points from the survey. Mr. Chen asked how the Meeting could be assured of meeting quorum before the Meeting began. Mr.Pato stated that the current bylaw quorum requirement was 100,so this would reduce it by 10. Mr.Chen asked if this would limit the number of Town Meeting sessions. Mr.Pato stated that it would not set limits on how many sessions Members attended remotely. 9:18 p.m. David Kanter,Pct. 7,asked that the Select Board Member who dissented on the vote give a statement. Select Board Member Doug Lucente stated that while he fully supported an avenue for hybrid meetings,he did not support the language in this particular Article that called for fully remote. He further stated that Mr.Pato had pointed out that the current bylaws did not allow for a fully remote meeting,he felt that the language regarding a fully remote meeting clouded the waters of what they were trying to do,which was to allow opportunities for people with disabilities or other conflicts to participate in Town Meeting. Mr.Kanter followed-up by asking how Mr. Lucerne felt about the section for emergency circumstances and whether he would support that option for fully remote. Mr.Lucerne stated that he would support fully remote in an emergency,but in his view the language of the Article left it open beyond an emergency. 9:20 p.m. Robert Avallone,Pct. 8,asked if they would only be able to call an emergency meeting if a facility was unavailable,or whether other situations would allow it. Mr.Pato stated that as written and given the bylaw that was just passed,they would require an emergency act of the legislature. He noted that what the Home Rule Petition requested was the ability to pass a bylaw that would allow for a fully remote meeting sometime in the future. Mr.Avallone asked for clarification if this were the first step and then another bylaw would need to be passed once the legislature approved the Petition. Mina Makarious,Town Counsel,stated that this Article would allow the Town to pass a bylaw in the future that would dictate whether a Meeting was hybrid,or conditions for March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. fully remote and the prior Article was the first step,but this was to request enabling legislation. 9:23 p.m. John Bartenstein,Pct. 1,noted that the legislation enacted to allow remote Town Meetings was very elaborate and felt that this Special Act was a"blank check"that the Town of Lexington,by bylaw,have a remote or hybrid Town Meeting and asked the opinion of Counsel whether there was a risk that the legislature would say that there weren't specifics for protections as provided by the legislature. Mr.Makarious stated that this was the result of a few iterations before the Select Board,and that his firm had been involved in 2020 as no one had done this before and the legislature had to move quickly at that time and act state-wide with a lot of the provisions intended to assuage fears by different stakeholders that the meetings would be done fairly and use proper process compared to an in-person town meeting. He further noted that now that there was more experience the thought was to have a process that Town Meeting could put in its own safeguards and assume that there was more flexibility from the State to do that and as the process went forward there were perhaps a few things that were put in place in 2020 that were unnecessary vestiges of trying to follow older statutes,and gave an example regarding notices to the Attorney General. 9:27 p.m. John Rossi,Pct. 1,asked what the time requirements were before the Town Meeting date that the Select Board declare a remote only Town Meeting. Mr.Pato noted that it was not specified in the Article. Mr.Makarious stated that the process would follow the existing 39:10A which allowed the Moderator to go to the physical location and if there were an emergency that causes no one else to go the meeting(snow,etc.)to recess the meeting and there was a complicated process in the Statute for it which allowed moving the Meeting out by no more than 30 days at a time,so effectively section 2 adds remote town meeting to a"place"where the Moderator could ask the Select Board to move the Meeting to,but it would follow the same extension for a couple of days to up to 30 days so that things could be figured out. Mr.Rossi asked if there was a situation such as an ice storm where it was unlikely they would get an in person quorum,if this could be used but still require delay of a few days but go forward if necessary. Mr.Makarious noted that it would typically require a day or so to give proper notice,but not an exact minimum number of days—just maximum of 30. Mr.Rossi asked if,on the morning of, they could change a meeting. Mr.Makarious stated that in that circumstance,the Moderator would need to meet in order to recess it. 9:28 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on Article 34 Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Allow for Select Board to Call Remote Meetings Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 171 7 3 MOTION CARRIES 9:34 p.m. The Moderator asked for a Motion to take up Articles 30 and 37. Ms.Hai moved to take up Articles 30 and 37. As there was no objections,the Motion carries. 9:35 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting on Article 30. ARTICLE 30 AMEND SPECIAL ACT-PLANNING BOARD AND TOWN MEETING MOTION:Mr.Peters moves that the Town authorize the Select Board to petition the Massachusetts General Court to enact legislation regarding the Planning Board in substantially the form below,and further to authorize the Select Board to approve amendments to said Act before its enactment by the General Court that are within the scope of the general objectives of the petition:Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled,and by the authority of the same, as follows: March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. SECTION 1. Section 3 of Chapter 215 of the Act of 1929,as previously amended,is hereby further amended by adding the phrase",chair of the planning board"after the phrase"chairman of the school committee". SECTION 2.This act shall take effect upon its passage. Robert Peters,Vice-Chair of the Planning Board gave a presentation and noted that the Planning Board recommended approval of the Article by a vote of 4-1. Suzanne Barry. Select Board Member,stated that the Select Board voted 3-2 in favor of the Article. 9:37 p.m. Leonard Morse-Fortier,Pct.7,stated that he didn't understand the premise for the Article as the Planning Chair had often addressed Town Meeting,and this seemed an inappropriate precedent. 9:38 p.m. Nyles Barnert,Pct.4,noted that Town Meeting,when he started,looked very different and only Chairs of Boards and Committees spoke,and only with a majority view. He noted that things were very different now,and the role of fiscal boards had much less impact on Town Meeting actions and most financial Articles were passed with little debate. He stated that land-use issues were different,due to the many requirements such as 40B and those from the MBTA and that the role of the Planning Board was more important and this Article would acknowledge that by giving the chairman the same rights as fiscal committees and was symbolic. 9:40 p.m. Melinda Walker, 14 Larchmont Lane,noted that she had read email comments regarding this Article on the TMMA listserve and felt that the Article should be focused on its merits,and not on individuals. She asked Town Meeting Members to consider the merits of the Article. 9:41 p.m. David Kanter,Pct. 7,said that many people were referring to the position as"ex-officio" while the language stated"at large". He asked if there were a meaningful difference between the terms. Mina Makarious,Town Counsel,stated that they effectively meant the same thing and was a position in Town Meeting due to the person's office. 9:42 p.m. Eric Michelson,Pct. 1,noted that based on the current format of Town Meeting that the Motion was reasonable and he planned to vote in favor of it. He stated that he thought that the basis for the financial board chairs being afforded membership in Town Meeting dated back to when the Town had switched from open town meeting to representative town meeting and at that time,prior to the Town Manager,the person at that time on the Appropriations Committee was entitled to create the budget for the Select Board's review and at that time it made sense,but things had changed a lot and he would like to see it changed and have all the Chairs of the committees stripped of their Town Meeting Membership. 9:44 p.m. Mark Andersen,Pct.9,stated that he had been reading the emails and considered what the community needed in the long term,and felt that this would be that all Members were directly elected and acted in a legislative capacity and would not have representation from those with executive style roles,but with no voting rights. 9:46 p.m. Ajay Joseph,Pct. 2,asked who had voted"no"on the Select Board and Planning Board. Mr.Peters noted that the person who was opposed on the Planning Board stated that this possibly wasn't timely and there were other ways to handle the situation,but said that as they were a Town Meeting Member,they could speak for themselves if they chose. Ms. Barry noted that the two members of the Select Board who were opposed were Mr.Pato and Mr. Sandeen. Mr.Pato stated that in general,he was opposed to committee chairs having a vote at Town Meeting by virtue of their office,and that if they wanted a vote a Town Meeting,they should run for elected office,and felt that the equity issue would not be fixed by adding additional chairs,and there were other committees,who by bylaw or statue,had regular articles in front of Town Meeting such as the Community Preservation Committee and this action didn't address all of the committees that would have the responsibility of financial or policy articles.He noted that his preference would be to vote it down now,and then do a study with how the meeting should operate and March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. come back with a proposal with a set of bylaws that would state how Committee chairs would operate. 9:50 p.m. Janet Kern,Pct. 1,noted that she was not in favor of an additional vote being given to the Planning Board and that it would erode the votes of Town Meeting Members and that the Report from the Planning Board already carried great weight when decisions were made and giving the Chair a vote would tip the vote in the favor of the Planning Board,and on non-zoning Articles,she didn't think that a vote should be given to a person who might not be any more informed than the rest of the Members. 9:52 p.m. Robert Avallone,Pct. 8,asked whether,if it passed,the Chair of the Planning Board could vote on any article—planning or otherwise. The Moderator noted that that they could. 9:53 p.m. Andrew Friedlich,Pct. 5,noted that he preferred the term"ex officio"and asked if they could vote a bylaw that would allow an ex officio chair the ability to move motions but not be able to vote. Counsel Makarious stated that"ex officio"just meant holds the position by virtue of the office and that it did not say whether or not one could vote. However,the rules of the Meeting could be changed to allow non-members to present, and in some ways it was up to the Moderator as long as it was consistent with the bylaw and this would not to change a Special Act. 9:55 p.m. Members continued to debate and discuss the Motion including whether it could be brought back at another time. 10:10 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on Article 30. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Amend Special Act—Planning Board and Town Meeting Fails by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 50 119 9 MOTION FAILS 10:12 p.m. Wendy Reasenberg,Pct.2 raised a Point of Order that she was unable to get to the "raised hand feature"and was unable to use the portal due to too many people voting. The Moderator thanked her for alerting her of the problem. 10:13 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 37. ARTICLE 37 AMEND ZONING BYLAW—TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS (Approved by the Attorney General's Office May 9,2022) MOTION:Mr. Schanbacher moves that the Zoning Bylaw,Chapter 135 of the Code of the Town of Lexington,be amended as follows to correct an inadvertent omission of language voted by the 2020- 2 Special Town Meeting,and further that non-substantive changes to the numbering of this bylaw be permitted to comply with the numbering format of the Code of the Town of Lexington: A.Add section§ 135-4.3.1.3 as follows,and renumber§ 135-4.3. 1:3.A Solar Energy System may be located over any paved parking lot. Mr. Schanbacher gave a presentation explaining the Article. 10:14 p.m. Mr. Schanbacher noted that the Planning Board unanimously supported the Article by a vote of 5-0. Mark Sandeen,Member of the Select Board stated the unanimous support of the Select Board for passage of the Article. 10:16 p.m. As there were no questions,The Moderator opened voting on Article 37 and noted that there would be a 2/3 vote requirement. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 37—Amend Zoning Bylaw—Technical Corrections Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 164 3 7 MOTION CARRIES WITH MORE THAN NECESSARY 2/3RDS 10:19 P.M. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 25. ARTICLE 25 APPROPRIATE FOR WORTHEN ROAD RECREATION AND EDUCATION DISTRICT LAND USE CONCEPT PLAN(Citizen Petition) MOTION: Mr.Himmel moves that the Article be indefinitely postponed. 10:21 p.m. The Moderator recognized Jim Himmel and Bridger McGaw for a presentation explaining the Article and the reasoning for indefinitely postponing it. Suzanne Barry, Select Board Member,stated that the Select Board was unanimous in their support of indefinitely postponing the Article. Kathleen Lenihan, School Committee Chair,stated that the School Committee was unanimous in their support of indefinitely postponing the Article. Charles Lamb,Capital Expenditure Committee Chair,stated that the Capital Expenditure Committee was unanimous in their support of indefinitely postponing the Article. Alan Levine,Appropriations Committee Member,noted that the Article was brought forward in true civic spirit for the Town as a whole,and not for a limited constituency. He stated that the Appropriations Committee Committee was unanimous in their support of indefinitely postponing the Article. As there were no questions,the Moderator noted that she would treat this as a voice vote,and asked if there were any objections to indefinite postponement. As there were none,the motion carries unanimously. 10:28 p.m. The Moderator gave an overview of upcoming Articles that would be coming forward in the next session of Town Meeting and reminded Members that the Planning Articles had to follow State laws on when petitions that had been negatively acted on could be brought back to Town Meeting. (MGL 40A:5, restrictions—2 years). She further explained that the proponents of Article 39 had originally wished to indefinitely postpone it,but the courts had determined that for laws regarding zoning articles,"IP" was considered a negative action,so they were planning to have it referred back to the Planning Board,which would not prejudice it,but would not bind the Planning Board to do anything with it,it just acted as a parliamentary motion that allowed the Town more time. The Moderator further noted possible amendments for Article 35,as well as the potential of two questions for reconsideration with Articles I Oe and IOf and asked Members to review the Town Meeting Members emails as she had expressed some concerns about the basis for Reconsideration. She then asked for a Motion to Adjourn to April 13''. 10:32 p.m. Ms.Jill Hai, Select Board Chair,Motioned to Adjourn the Annual Town Meeting to Wednesday,April 13,2022,such meeting to be held remotely. As there were no objections,the Moderator declared that Motion adopted and the Meeting adjourned. April 13,2022 Adiourned Session of the 2022 Annual Town Meeting Moderator Deborah Brown called the sixth session of the 2022 Annual Town Meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.on Wednesday,April 13,2022.The meeting was held remotely as voted by order of the Select Board and request of the Moderator. 7:30 p.m. The Moderator offered a warm welcome to everyone and especially to members of the public who were watching the proceedings via local access cable television or March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. livestreaming the event. She then noted that statements or comments for or against an Article could be registered with the website. 7:31 p.m. The Moderator then opened the portal to register attendance. While attendance was being taken,she gave general reminders and instructions for the Meeting. 7:33 p.m. The Moderator noted that a quorum had been reached and that the Portal should be closed and reminded Members that if they were experiencing any technical difficulties to reach out to the staff at the help line. She indicated that the Meeting would move forward with a Memorial for Taylor Lahiff,who had passed away on March 26,2022 at the age of 28. Taylor's parents,Joseph and Kelly Lahiff are residents of Lexington,as are her grandparents John and Eleanor Lahiff,and her brothers John and Joseph Lahiff. Taylor graduated from Lexington High School in 2012. While a senior at LHS,Taylor was elected as a Town Meeting Member at the age of 18. Her father,father,Joe,was himself a former Member,and said that Taylor thoroughly enjoyed her time as a Member and had caught the political bug working on Ken Donelley's State Senate campaign,and had worked the phones,door knocking,and proved to have a knack for it. Taylor graduated from Bridgewater State University in 2017. While still in High School,she had done volunteer work supporting people living with disabilities and had originally considered a career in nursing,but had received a degree in special education with a goal of working with children with autism and other challenges. Taylor loved spending time with her entire family,including her dog, Chief.The Moderator noted that she would be missed by all who knew her and then asked for a Moment of Silence in Taylor's honor. 7:36 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 2—Reports of Town Boards,Officers and Committees. Mr.Peters moves that the Planning Board Report to the Annual Town Meeting be received and placed on file. The Moderator stated that she would treat this as a voice vote unless there were any objections. As none were raised,the Motion Carries Unanimously. 7:37 p.m. Charles Hornig,Planning Board Chair,gave a presentation and thanked the Planning Board staff for their support. He also welcomed Abigail McCabe as the new Planning Director. The Moderator asked for a Motion to receive and place on file specific Planning Board Reports. Mr.Peters moves that the Planning Board reports for Articles 35,36,37,38, 39 and 40 be accepted. As there were no objections,the Motion Carries Unanimously. The Moderator then asked for a Motion to receive the Special Permit Residential Development(SPRD)Zoning Bylaw Amendment Ad Hoc Committee Update and Progress Report. Ms.Hai moved the Motion.The Moderator stated that she would treat this as a voice vote unless there were any objections. As there were no objections,the Motion Carries Unanimously. 7:40 p.m. The Moderator then asked for a Motion to take up Articles 38 and 39. Ms.Hai motioned to take up Articles 38 and 39. As there were no objections,the Motion Carries Unanimously. 7:41 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 38. ARTICLE 38 AMEND ZONING BYLAW&MAP—95 Hayden Ave and 128 Spring Street(99 Hayden Ave)—Owner Petition (Approved by the Attorney General's Office May 9,2022) MOTION: Mr.Heinrich moves that: (a) the Zoning By-laws,Chapter 135 of the Code of the Town of Lexington,and the Zoning Map of the Town of Lexington be amended by changing the district designation of the parcels identified as Map 17,Lot 22 and Map 18,Lot 2B on the March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Assessor's Map,and described in a certain metes and bounds description and certain plans on file with the Planning Board and Town Clerk as part of a Preliminary Site Development and Use Plan dated December 15,2021 and revised as of March 10,2022("PSDUP")from the current CD-14 Commercial Development District to a Planned Development District-6 ("PD-6")as described in said PSDUP;and (b) the zoning regulations and dimensional standards identified in the"Proposed Motion"document which is the"PSDUP Zoning Text"provided in the PSDUP as Article 38,and the"Regulatory Plans"attached thereto,shall apply to said District PD-6. Brad Cardoso,Vice-President and Director of Design and Construction for Hobbs Brook Real Estate gave a presentation on the Article and their plans to create a Planned Development District along with a project overview and sustainability strategies. 7:56 p.m. Charles Hornig,Planning Board Chair noted the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Board for approval of Article 38. He noted that the petitioners had worked with the Planning Board through the Hearing process and there was more information available in their written Report. Douglas Lucente,Vice-Chair of the Select Board,noted that the Select Board had voted to unanimously approve the MOU between the Town of Lexington and Hobbs Brook Real Estate and unanimously supported passage of the Article. 7:58 p.m. The Meeting was opened for debate and discussion. Mark Anderson,Pct.9,stated that it was great to see investment being proposed for the site and incorporation of the conservation area as well as the crossing area at Spring Street and stated that it would help with job competitiveness in the area and was a key investment for Lexington. 8:01 p.m. Jeanne Canale,Pct.9,said that she believed that the current mitigation package negotiated between the Developer and the Select Board was inadequate. She said that the scope of the project was massive and affected 3 neighboring areas including 2 years of blasting,and light spill and said that felt that there should be a clearer path for achieving adequate mitigation. 8:04 p.m. Bronte Abraham,Pct.3,asked for key points of the recently posted Memorandum of Understanding(MOU)since the document dated April 6t'. Jim Malloy,Town Manager,stated that there were no additional changes to the MOU since it had been posted online. Ms.Abraham followed up by saying that one of the items they had brought up on the tour was the ability to add signage that would be placed on the front entrance of the facility to alert people approaching it off of Route 2/128 to know to turn right onto Hayden Avenue,and wondered what type of mechanisms or stipulations were in place in the Project to help to drive traffic off of Spring Street. Charles Hornig,Planning Board Chair,stated that the specific details such as this would be in the Site Plan Review,and that this Article was considered at the"moderate"detail level,not final level. The Site Plan Review process,which would set these details, would happen later and require a public hearings,notice,and discussions,and noted that traffic safety on Hayden and Spring streets had been a concern of the applicant. Mr. Cardoso noted that they had not developed a site signage package yet but were in full support of noting the Hayden entrance as the primary entrance for prospective tenants. 8:08 p.m. Ashley Khattach,5 April Lane,noted that while she supports the development,she is concerned about traffic in the area as there didn't seem to be a traffic plan and people were using the smaller streets as cut throughs. She asked that Town Meeting not approve the Article until a traffic plan could be done. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 8:09 p.m. Sanjay Padaki,Pct. 8,asked for the timeline of the project. Mr.Cardoso noted that if they were granted approval,then they hoped to move to Site Plan Review in the summer,and site work started in Q4 of this year. Building 1,depending upon procurement,could take between 18-24 months to build. Mr.Padaki stated that he thought that most of the development would be done on Lot 99,although both 95 and 99 were listed and wanted to know if there was a reason for that. Peter Tamm stated that for the purposes of rezoning both lots were considered one,but that it was correct that the development would be principally on the 99 parcel. Mr.Padaki asked for clarification of whether there would be work on the 95 lot. Mr.Tamm stated that that was essentially correct,but that there might be construction lay down areas.Mr. Cardoso stated that they had a long term lease with 95 and they did not anticipate any major renovation of the area. Mr.Padaki asked if they had identified any potential new tenants for the space. Mr. Cardoso stated that they had not begun to market the site as they currently did not have approval to develop it. 8:15 p.m. Robert Rotberg,Pct.3,moved to Table the Article. The Moderator asked Mr.Rotberg to explain why he would like to do so,and his goal. Mr.Rotberg said Ms. Canale had already spoken of the many questions that remained about mitigation numbers and they should be higher. The Moderator stated that while she understood him arguing for a"no"vote,it was likely the last night of Town Meeting so a more direct path for what he was speaking about would be a"no"vote. Mr.Rotberg stated,that with respect,tabling would be more appropriate as it would enable Hobbs Brook to come back with mitigation payments rather quickly. The Moderator asked Mr.Rotberg to clarify if he thought that they would come back to this particular Town Meeting and asked him to state his intention,in case the Meeting was dissolved. Mr.Rotberg stated that he was not sure whether they would be meeting on April 25h. The Moderator stated that she would not entertain the Motion to Table and they should continue with discussions. Mr.Rotberg restated his request to Table as it would give Hobbs Brook an opportunity to change the mitigation amounts as this was a large development and had low amounts.The Moderator stated that she would allow a vote on Tabling the Article,but noted that the Meeting was on a path to finish that evening,and she did not know to which Meeting Mr.Rotberg wanted it to be continued to. 8:18 p.m. The Moderator opened voting on whether to Table Article 38. 8:19 p.m. Mr.Anderson raised Point of Order to state that there might be confusion about what it meant to support or not support tabling the Article. The Moderator noted that Mr. Rotberg wanted Members to stop debating this and to Table it,as he wanted something else to happen before it was taken back off the Table,but as it was near the end of Town Meeting,she had tried to persuade Mr.Rotberg that she did not think it was a good idea as they would need to take it back up if they were to finish the Meeting that evening. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Lav Article 38 on the Table Fails by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 21 141 14 MOTION TO LAY ON TABLE FAILS 8:24 p.m. Meeting Members continued to discuss the Article including questions regarding construction and possible noise impacts. 8:40 p.m. The Moderator opened voting under Article 38. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 38—Amend Zoning Bylaw and Zoning Map—128 Spring Street(Owner Petition) Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 169 6 2 MOTION CARRIES WITH MORE THAN NECESSARY 2/3RDS 8:44 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 39 ARTICLE 39:AMEND ZONING BYLAW AND ZONING MAP-475 BEDFORD STREET (OWNER PETITION) MOTION: Mr.Grant moves that the Article be referred to the Planning Board. Charles Hornig,Planning Board Chair,noted that the Planning Board unanimously supported referring the Article back to the Planning Board so that they could continue to work with the Crescent Group. Suzanne Barry, Select Board Member,stated the unanimous support of the Select Board to refer the Article back to the Planning Board.. 8:45 p.m. The Moderator stated that unless there were objections,she would treat this as a voice vote. As there were no objections,the Motion Carries Unanimously. 8:46 p.m. The Moderator opened the Meeting under Article 31. ARTICLE 31 AMEND GENERAL BYLAW-REPORTING,DISCLOSING,AND ASSESSING THE ENERGY AND WATER USE OF LARGE BUILDINGS (Approved by the Attorney General's Office August 2,2022) MOTION: Ms.Arens moves that the Code of the Town of Lexington be amended by 1. Adding a new Chapter 20,`Buildings,Energy Use"as follows, Section 1.Definitions For the purposes of this section,the following words shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly requires otherwise: "Commercial building",a building or multiple buildings on a parcel of which not less than 50 per cent of the gross floor area,including hallways or other common space,but excluding parking,is used for commercial,retail,office,professional,educational or other nonresidential purposes,or some combination thereof,or any grouping of commercial buildings designated by the Town as an appropriate Reporting Unit for the purposes of this section;provided,however,that"Commercial building"shall not include a building owned or leased by a municipal,state,or federal agency. "Energy",electricity,natural gas,steam,hot or chilled water,heating or fuel oil,propane,on-site renewable energy,or other products used for heating,cooling,lighting,or water heating,or for powering or fueling other end uses. "Energy use benchmarking tool",the ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager,an online energy use benchmarking tool used by the United States Environmental Protection Agency for reporting and managing the energy performance,water efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of buildings,or March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. some other tool capable of;(i)performing all the functions relevant to compliance with this section; (ii)allowing for reporting by third parties,including but not limited to,gas distribution and electric distribution companies;and(iii)exchanging information and data with the ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions,"as defined in M.G.L. c. 21N. "Gross floor area",as defined in Town of Lexington Zoning Bylaw Chapter 135-10.1 "Reporting Unit,"a building or buildings that meet(s)any of the following criteria: (1)buildings owned or leased by the Town,or(2)as of May 15,2022 a parcel with one or more buildings of 25,000 sq.ft.or more with residential or commercial uses or a combination of residential and commercial uses. In the case of criteria(2)above,where there is more than one building on a parcel, the Town may permit the entire complex of buildings to report as a single"Reporting Unit,"or may designate one or more buildings as separate"Reporting Units." "Owner,"the owner of record of a Reporting Unit,or a designated agent thereof,including,but not limited to,the association or organization of unit owners responsible for management in the case of a condominium,the board of directors in the case of a cooperative apartment corporation,the trustees or governing body in the case of a not-for-profit entity and the net lessee in the case of a building subject to a net lease with a term of not less than 49 years,inclusive of all renewal options. "Residential building",a Reporting Unit on a parcel of which not less than 50%of the gross floor area,including hallways and other common space serving residents,but excluding parking,is used for dwelling purposes,or any grouping of residential buildings designated by the Town or a municipality as an appropriate Reporting Unit for the purposes of this chapter. "Tenant",any tenant,tenant-stockholder of a cooperative apartment corporation,or condominium unit owner. Section 2:Reporting and Disclosure Requirements (a)The Town shall undertake energy use benchmarking to determine whether each Reporting Unit utilizes more or less energy,and emits more or less Greenhouse Gas Emissions,than Reporting Units of comparable size,occupancies and uses,and to inform a town-wide analysis of energy use trends and opportunities to increase energy efficiency and reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions. (b)(1)To administer this section,the Town shall define building types. .The Town may designate subcategories within each building type,and may establish different reporting requirements for each subcategory. (2)Not later than May 15 of each year,beginning in 2023,the Owner of each Reporting Unit shall use the energy use benchmarking tool to accurately report to the Town,or cause to be accurately reported to the Town,the Reporting Unit's energy use,any electricity suppliers' energy labels(i.e., electricity source),any retired Class I or equivalent Renewable Energy Certificates(RECs)for the previous calendar year,and any building characteristics determined by the Town to be necessary to establish the absolute and relative energy use of the Reporting Unit.The Owner of a Reporting Unit subject to this section may authorize a gas or electric distribution company or other third party to report building-specific data to the Town,provided,however,that such authorization shall not relieve an Owner from compliance with this section. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. (3)An Owner of a Reporting Unit with separately-metered and tenant-occupied units shall request the electric and gas distribution companies to provide the aggregate energy consumption of all meters in the Reporting Unit, including tenant-occupied units and separately-metered units. If the electric and gas distribution companies do not provide the requested information,the Owner shall annually request from each tenant of the Reporting Unit all information necessary to comply with the requirements of paragraph(2). (4)An Owner may request that the Town extend the Owner's deadline to provide a required report for good cause shown. (5)If an occupied Reporting Unit subject to the requirements of this section is transferred,the buyer shall make reasonable efforts to report energy use information for the Reporting Unit for the entire calendar year,if practicable. (c)Not later than October 1 of each year,the Town shall make available on its website energy use information and data for the preceding calendar year for each Reporting Unit.For each Reporting Unit,the information made available shall include,but not be limited to: (i) the address of the Reporting Unit and building ID(s)(as established by the Town)for all buildings within the Reporting Unit; (ii) the Owner of the Reporting Unit; (iii) total square footage; (iv) building type; (v) the Reporting Unit's total energy use in kBTU and energy use intensity in kBTU per square foot; (vi) the breakdown of the Reporting Unit's energy use and energy use intensity by electricity, gas,renewable energy,and other sources; (vii) water usage;and (viii)the Reporting Unit's total Greenhouse Gas Emissions intensity in kg COze per square foot. (d)The Town shall utilize such practices as are necessary to prevent the public disclosure of personal information regarding owners and tenants,and maintain a quality assurance process to improve the accuracy and completeness of the available information.The Town shall provide owners with the opportunity to submit contextual information related to energy use in their Reporting Units and shall disclose such information on its website upon request by the owner. (e)The Town shall prepare an annual comprehensive report on the energy performance of Reporting Units utilizing the information and data collected pursuant to this section.The report shall include, but not be limited to,an analysis of energy performance,Greenhouse Gas Emissions,and energy sources by building size,occupancy,and use.The report shall also include,when available,energy performance and Greenhouse Gas Emissions over time. The report shall be posted on the Town's website. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. (f)On the basis of the comprehensive reports prepared by the Town,the Town shall conduct an annual review of trends in the energy performance of Reporting Units and recommend changes to laws,regulations,policies,and programs to achieve Greenhouse Gas Emission reductions. Section 3:Enforcement Owners of Reporting Units failing to comply(after December 31,2024)with the energy use reporting and benchmarking requirements of this section or knowingly providing false or incomplete information to the Town shall be subject to a noncriminal disposition fine pursuant to M.G.L.c.40, § 21D and§ 1-6 of the Town's Code of Bylaws,provided that no Owner shall be fined for a failure to report data it has not been able to obtain from a Tenant or electric and gas distribution company, where the Owner has demonstrated it has made a good faith effort to obtain that data.Each day of noncompliance shall constitute a separate violation per day of noncompliance for Reporting Units. 2. Amending Section B of the Non-Criminal Disposition Bylaw,Chapter 1-6 of the Code of the Town of Lexington,by adding the following,and further that non-substantive changes to the numbering of this bylaw be permitted to comply with the numbering format of the Code of the Town of Lexington: Bylaw Fine Schedule Fine Allowed Enforcement Agency Building Energy Use Per violation $300 Town Manager or Disclosure Town Manager's designee 8:47 p.m. Todd Rhodes,Member of the Sustainable Lexington Committee presented information on the Article discussing large building energy use. 8:53 p.m. Suzanne Barry, Select Board Member,stated the unanimous support of the Select Board for the Article.The Moderator noted that a letter of support by Rick DeAngelis of the Economic Development Advisory Committee was posted on the website. Robert Balaban,Pct. 5,said that according to the presentation,water data was being collected by the Town and wondered if it was publicly available. Jim Malloy,Town Manager,stated that it was not. Mr.Rhodes stated that the way the bylaw was worded, the Town had the information and if the Article were passed,they would have the authority to be able to report it as water use per square foot.Mr.Balaban asked if the report would include Town buildings. Mr.Rhodes stated that it would. 8:55 p.m. David Kanter,Pct. 7,stated that while he supported the objectives of the Motion,in its current form it had overlapping requirements that shouldn't be there and needed to be cleaned up in order to be consistent with regard to references to"condominium". 8:56 p.m. Ricki Pappo,Pct.2,stated her support of the Article as it gave Town Meeting the opportunity to express its strong support of addressing climate change. She noted that she was also Chair of the Lexington Climate Action Network and they had voted unanimously to support the Article. 9:00 p.m. Fran Ludwig, 19 Wyman Road,expressed her support of the Article and the urgent need to document the current planet-warming emissions,especially in large buildings. 9:01 p.m. Avram Baskin,Pct.2,asked if there were any particular reasons that were given by building owners who were not in support of the Article. Mr.Rhodes stated that in their March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. outreach,where they got feedback it was overwhelmingly positive,but that some companies had not responded. He noted that when they had heard back from residential condominium owners,their concern was large properties with many small buildings so they had excised that part of the definition to ensure they weren't included. 9:04 p.m. Scott Burson,Pct.9,Called the Question. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Terminate Debate Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 111 50 14 MOTION CARRIES 9:06 p.m. Mr. Rhodes made summation comments regarding how the Article would help to make Lexington a more sustainable and resilient Town as it would help . 9:07 p.m. Steven Heinrich,Pct. 1,raised a Point of Order that he was reading the amended Motion,but could not find the change to remove the condominium developments from the reporting. Mr.Rhodes stated that it was in the definition of"reporting units". The information was shown on screen and noted that the portion regarding larger properties with smaller buildings had been removed. 9:10 p.m. The Moderator opened voting under Article 31 Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 31—Amend General Bylaw—Reporting,Disclosing,and Assessing the Energy and Water Use of Large Buildings Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 164 5 4 MOTION CARRIES 9:14 p.m. The Moderator opened voting under Article 35. ARTICLE 35 AMEND ZONING BYLAW-OPEN SPACE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS (Approved by the Attorney General's Office August 1,2022) MOTION: Mr.Peters moves that the Zoning Bylaw,Chapter 135 of the Code of the Town of Lexington,be amended as follows,and further that non-substantive changes to the numbering of this bylaw be permitted to comply with the numbering format of the Code of the Town of Lexington: 1. Add a new row to§ 135-3.4,Table 1,Permitted Uses and Development Standards,as follows: GC RO RS RT CN CRS CS CB CLO CRO CM CSX Open space residential A.1.06 development(OSRD) N R R R N N N N N N N N (see§ 6.12) 2. In§ 135-10.0,add new definitions as follows: HISTORIC BUILDING A building eligible to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the Historical Commission's Cultural Resources Inventory for which an historic preservation restriction in a form acceptable to the Historical Commission is in effect. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. INCLUSIONARY DWELLING UNIT A dwelling unit,the sale,lease,or rental of which is permanently restricted with limits on the household income of occupants,sale price,and rent through a deed rider or other restriction acceptable to the Town in conformance to the Lexington Moderate Unit Income Guidelines or as regulated as a Local Action Unit under the DHCD Local Initiative Program. MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING As defined in MGL c.40A, § IA. OPEN LAND As defined in MGL c.40A, § IA. OPEN SPACE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT(OSRD) As defined in MGL c.40A, § IA. 3. Add a new§ 135-6.12 as follows: 6.12 OPEN SPACE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS. 6.12.1 Purpose.This section is intended to: 1. Permit the development of open space residential developments(OSRDs); 2. Encourage greater diversity of housing opportunities in Lexington to meet the needs of a population which is diversified with respect to number of persons in a household,stage of life,abilities,and income; 3. Promote development proposals designed with sensitivity to the characteristics of a site that otherwise might limit development options due to the application of uniform,largely geometric standards; 4. Permit different types of structures and residential uses to be combined in a planned interrelationship that promotes a relationship between new buildings,public facilities,and Open Land; 5. Preserve historically or architecturally significant buildings or places,including consideration for siting,sight lines,and landscaping; 6. Encourage the preservation or restoration of aesthetically or environmentally valuable features of Open Land and minimize impacts on environmentally sensitive areas; 7. Encourage residential development that is consistent with the Town's sustainability goals and encourages sustainable development techniques;and 8. Develop housing that is or can be adapted to be accessible and attainable for older persons and persons with disabilities. 6.12.2 General Standards. 1. The degree of development permitted in an OSRD shall be based on the extent to which the OSRD complies with the criteria set forth below and regulations adopted pursuant to §9.5.5 to further the purposes of this section. 2. An OSRD must be located on a tract of land of at least 70,000 SF. 3. The proof plan for an OSRD shall show two or more lots. 6.12.3 Dimensional Standards.Within an OSRD,the requirements of§4.0 shall be modified as follows: 1. Lot area.There is no minimum lot area required for individual lots within an OSRD, provided that each lot shall be designed to be a sufficient size to meet the off-street parking requirements of this Bylaw,if applicable,and to permit the installation of any on- site water supply and sewage disposal facilities.The requirements of§4.2.2(Lot Regularity)and§4.2.3(Developable Site Area)do not apply. 2. Frontage.There is no minimum lot frontage required,provided that there is sufficient frontage to provide for adequate access to the building site.Where shared driveways or other circumstances render frontage on a street unnecessary for such adequate access,no frontage is required. 3. Yard.Yards required by §4.0 shall apply to the perimeter of an OSRD.No yards are required within an OSRD.Buildings may share a common wall. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 4. Height.The height limits of§4.0 shall apply to all structures in an OSRD except that §4.3.5 shall apply only along the perimeter of an OSRD. 5. Dwellings and Dwelling Units.There is no limit on the number of dwellings in an OSRD or on a lot.The requirements of§4.1.4(One Dwelling per Lot)do not apply.The number of dwelling units other than inclusionary dwelling units in an OSRD shall not exceed five (5)times the number of lots shown on the proof plan.The SPCA may issue a special permit to exceed the limit established by this§ 6.12.3.5,which may require the provision of additional Inclusionary Dwelling Units,Open Land,or Common Open Space. 6. Amenity space.At least 180 square feet of unroofed amenity space shall be available for the exclusive use of the residents of each dwelling unit. 7. Floor Area.The requirements of§4.4(Residential Gross Floor Area)shall not apply in an OSRD except as provided below. a. The total gross floor area of all buildings,excluding inclusionary dwelling units,shall not exceed the total gross floor area permitted under§4.4 for all lots shown on the proof plan. b. The gross floor area of each building shall not exceed 9,350 SF in the RO District and 7,030 SF in the RS and RT Districts. c. Historic Buildings shall not be included in the calculation of gross floor area under §6.12.3.7.a and§ 6.12.3.7.b. d. Dwelling units within Historic Buildings shall not be included in the calculation of gross floor area under§ 6.12.3.7.e and§6.12.3.7.f. e. The gross floor area of any dwelling unit shall not exceed 5,250 square feet. f. The average gross floor area of all dwelling units shall not exceed 2,625 square feet. g. In multi-family housing the SPCA may issue a special permit to exceed these limits in accordance with§4.4.3. h. The site plan for the OSRD shall specify maximum gross floor areas for the whole OSRD,each dwelling,and each dwelling unit.Any deed for all or a portion of the OSRD shall restrict the gross floor area of that portion in accordance with the site plan. 6.12.4 Parking. 1. Visitor parking.A minimum of 1 additional parking space per every 4 dwelling units shall be provided for visitor parking. 6.12.5 Open Land and Common Open Space. 1. Required Open Land and Common Open Space. a. At least 35%of the developable site area within an OSRD shall be set aside as Open Land. b. In addition to Open Land set aside under the previous provision,at least 15%of the developable site area within an OSRD shall be set aside as Common Open Space. c. The Open Land required shall be decreased by two times the site coverage of any Historic Buildings. 2. Ownership. Open Land shall be conveyed to: a. A legal association comprised of the owners of the OSRD,which may include homeowners or owners of condominium or cooperative units; b. The Town,subject to acceptance,to ensure its perpetual use as open space or park land;or c. A nonprofit organization,the principal purpose of which is the conservation of open space. 3. Restriction.When such Open Land is conveyed to entities other than the Town,a conservation restriction over such land shall be granted to the Town,or a nonprofit organization,the principal mission of which is the conservation of open space,to ensure its perpetual use as open space or park land. 4. Regulation.The Planning Board shall adopt additional regulations concerning the condition,location,ownership,and preservation of Open Land consistent with§ 6.12.1 and MGL c.40A,§ IA. 5. Certificate of occupancy.No certificate of occupancy shall be issued until any conveyances of Open Land or restrictions are executed and recorded. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 6.12.6 INCLUSIONARY HOUSING. 1. Required inclusionary dwelling units. a. At least 20%,or 25%in developments where the total permitted gross floor area under §6.12.3.7.a is greater than 60,000 SF,of the gross floor area of all dwelling units shall be incorporated into inclusionary dwelling units. b. Inclusionary dwelling units shall be substantially similar in size,layout,construction materials,fixtures,amenities,and interior and exterior finishes to comparable dwelling units in the same dwelling. c. Occupants of inclusionary dwelling units shall have similar access to common areas, facilities,and services as enjoyed by other occupants of the development including but not limited to outdoor spaces,amenity spaces,storage,parking,bicycle parking facilities,and resident services. d. Inclusionary dwelling units shall be dispersed throughout the development rather than concentrated within particular sections of a dwelling or within particular dwellings. e. The Planning Board,in consultation with the Select Board,the Housing Partnership Board,and the Commission on Disability,shall adopt regulations concerning physical characteristics,location,and access to services of inclusionary dwelling units;defining limits on the household income of occupants,sale price,and rent of inclusionary dwelling units;and the form of required legal restrictions. 2. Subsidized housing inventory.At least 10%of the dwelling units in an OSRD shall be eligible for inclusion on the DHCD Subsidized Housing Inventory. 3. Certificate of occupancy.No certificate of occupancy shall be issued until an affordable housing restriction for inclusionary dwelling units is executed,submitted to the Town, and,to the extent required,recorded. 6.12.7 DESIGN STANDARDS. 1. The Planning Board shall adopt design guidelines and regulations to facilitate sustainable site layouts,quality building designs,and purposeful outdoor amenity spaces that create vibrant residential communities that benefit the residents of the development and the town. Robert Peters,Vice-Chair of the Planning Board,presented information about the Article and explained how OSRD was defined by Massachusetts General Law 40A-IA. Mr.Peters noted that the Planning Board had voted 4-0 with 1 abstention to recommended the Article. Mark Sandeen, Select Board Member,stated that the Select Board had voted 4 in favor with 1 waiting for discussion at Town Meeting. Wendy Manz,Member of the Special Permit Residential Development Zoning Bylaw Amendment Ad Hoc Committee,stated the unanimous support of the Article. Marilyn Fenollosa,Chair of the Historical Commission,noted the Historical Commission had voted 4- 1 to oppose Article 35. Mr.Pato read that the recommendation of the Housing Partnership Board,which stated they had voted unanimously in support of the Article. 9:27 p.m. Kathryn Roy,Pct.4,and Chair of the Affordable Housing Trust Study Committee,noted that she was concerned with how long it took to develop affordable housing in the Town and would be supporting the Article. 9:31 p.m. David Kanter,Pct.7,stated that he could not support another"by right"item as they were waiting for the MBTA obligation the legislature had placed on the Town. Susann Remold, 35 Moon Hill Road, noted the strong support of Lexington towards conservation,but was concerned by the number of small houses torn down and very large, very expensive houses replacing them,and due to their size,the ground around them left small patches of lawn which could cause ecological impact to the Town, biological diversity in the nearby natural areas,as well as diversity inclusion impacts accompanying the loss of moderate housing,and priced out individuals unable to afford the larger homes and supported the Article as a useful mechanism for diversity of housing. 9:32 p.m. John Himmel,Pct.6,stated that the Article indicated that the Planning Board"shall'adopt design guidelines and wondered if the design standards could be made an enforceable March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. portion of the Article. Counsel Makarious answered affirmatively. Mr. Himmel asked whether any State regulations preclude the design standards from dealing with aesthetic and compatibility issues. Counsel Makarious asked for clarification on the word "compatibility". Mr.Himmel said that this was how a building looked in its environment against other buildings on the site. Counsel Makarious said that no,generally speaking, aesthetic requirements could be incorporated into the zoning bylaws,as long as they were reasonable and objective. Mr.Himmel asked if the design provisions were adopted after passage of the Article, how would those design standards be enforced? Counsel Makarious stated that aesthetic guidelines were often included as part of implementing the zoning bylaw and that part of the reason to do that was to have objective aesthetic standards and that it was hard to be objective with too narrowly constraining what could be developed. Often it was a consideration or factor to look at things such as context or compatibility without limiting what could be built. He further noted that anything in the design guidelines that went beyond basic dimensional standards would be the same in providing some flexibility but that they would have to be consistent with the bylaws and couldn't add anything inconsistent with them. Mr. Himmel asked the Select Board for input on whether they would require the OSRD design standards be reviewed by any conditions or committees or design professionals. Mr.Makarious said that in order to be clear,design guidelines for regulations implementing portions of zoning were permitted by the Planning Board, whether or not they were stated in the bylaw and under their purview. 9:35 p.m. Town Meeting members continued discussion of the Article. 9:49 p.m. Motion:Robert Creech,Pct. 7 moved to Amend the Motion under Article 35,Open Space Residential Development as follows: Amend the proposed Table of Uses,Row A1.06,under item 1,as follows: In the RO,RS and RT Districts,require a Special Permit instead of the proposed Site Plan Review. a.For the RO District,replace"R"with"SP" b.For the RS District,replace"R"with"SP" c.For the RT District,replace"R"with"SP" Mr. Creech presented information to which he stated would implement Article 35 under "Special Permit"instead of"by right". 9:58 p.m. The Moderator asked for recommendations on the Amendment. Mr.Peters,Vice-Chair of the Planning Board, stated that requiring a Special Permit was inconsistent with purpose of OSRD and the Planning Board had voted 4-1 to not recommend adoption of the Amendment. Mark Sandeen,Select Board Member,stated that that 3 Select Board members were not in favor of the Amendment and 2 members were still awaiting discussion of Town Meeting. Wendy Manz,Member of the Special Permit Residential Development Zoning Bylaw Amendment Ad Hoc Committee,stated the unanimous opposition of the Amendment. Marilyn Fenollosa,Chair of the Historical Commission,noted the Historical Commission had not taken a position on the Amendment as it was submitted after they had made their initial determination. Mr.Pato stated that the Housing Partnership Board had voted unanimously,with one abstention,to not support the Amendment. 10:02 p.m. The Moderator opened the floor for discussion of the Amendment. Town Meeting Members discussed pros and cons of the Amendment. 10:20 p.m. The Moderator stated that the time for debate on the Amendment had ended. Mr.Canale raised a Point of Order to clarify the specifics of the vote. The Moderator noted that she would give specifics before the vote was called. The Moderator called on Mr. Sandeen,who requested a moment to poll the Board. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. 10:21 p.m. Mr. Creech gave a summary of the Amendment. 10:22 p.m. Bob Avallone,Precinct 8,raised a Point of Order that the Select Board should offer their final opinion now that debate had ended. 10:23 p.m. Sanjay Padaki, Precinct 1, raised a Point of Order to ask whether there was a mechanism to extend debate by 5 minutes. The Moderator stated that although there was,as Mr. Creech had already given summary comments,it could not be used at that time. Mr. Sandeen stated that the Select Board had 4 members opposed to the Amendment and 1 in favor. The Moderator then explained that the upcoming vote was to be on the Amendment offered by Mr. Creech,and that it would require a simple majority. If the Amendment passed,however,the main Motion,which originally had needed a simple majority to pass,would then require a 2/3 vote. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 35—Amendment Fails on a vote of: Yes No Abstain 70 94 8 MOTION TO AMEND FAILS 10:27 p.m. Meeting Members returned to discussion of the main Motion. Valerie Overton,Pct. 1,asked for guidelines regarding inclusionary vs affordable housing. Robert Peters,Vice-Chair of the Planning Board,stated that 10%of dwelling units in an OSRD would be eligible for inclusion on subsidized housing inventory and the inclusionary units,which would include the affordable units,would qualify for inclusion on the SHI as well as the work force or other inclusionary units would be subject to the 20%of the total development or 25%of the market rate units—which mathematically were the same,but expressed differently. Ms. Overton asked for clarification as to the types of open space required in terms of natural environment versus manicured environments. Charles Hornig,Planning Board Chair,stated that the statute requires that open land be kept in an open or natural state and not be used for residential units or developed for accessory uses and that it be perpetually used as open space or parkland. In addition to that,which was the base minimum,the Planning Board was required to adopt additional regulations to regulate the condition,location,ownership and preservation of open land consistent with the purposes. 10:34 p.m. Richard Canale,Pct.9,raised a Point of Order stating that a majority vote would carry the Motion and proceeded to frame a question. The Moderator stated that if he had a question,and not a Point of Order,he should get into a question line. 10:35 p.m. Bridger McGaw,Pct. 6,raised a Point of Order requesting that debate be extended by 10 minutes. The Moderator noted that there was not a time limit on debate at that time. Mr.McGaw withdrew his Motion. 10:36 p.m. Dawn McKenna,Pct. 6,Called the Question. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Terminate Debate Fails by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 78 80 10 MOTION FAILS 10:38 p.m. After the vote,debate and discussion continued on the Motion. 10:53 p.m. Steven Kaufman,Pct. 5, Called the Question. 10:54 p.m. Tanya Gisolfi-McCready,Pct. 1,raised a Point of Order whether the it was possible to postpone and not call the question. The Moderator stated that a vote needed to be taken on whether to terminate debate. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Terminate Debate Adopted by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 97 60 8 MOTION CARRIES 10:56 p.m. Mr.Peters offered summary comments on the Article and stated that OSRD was a tool for Lexington to goals of a different type of housing,while producing incentives for building affordable inclusionary housing. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Article 35—Open Space Residential Developments Adopted on a vote of: Yes No Abstain 110 47 13 MOTION CARRIES 11:00 P.M. The Moderator opened the Meeting for Reconsideration of the Motions of Article I Oe Center Playground Bathrooms and Maintenance Building and 10f Park Improvements, Hardcourt Resurfacing. 11:01 P.M. Taylor Singh moves that Article I Oe and IOf be Reconsidered. She then explained her reasons for Reconsideration, including that the timeline for the footprint for the new High School was not widely relayed,and that the construction of the Center Playground Bathrooms could be located within the footprint of the new school, as well as Dr. Hackett's and Mr. Cronin's comments that everything was on the table. 11:05 p.m. Steven Kaufman,Pct. 5,raised a Point of Order asking why both were being brought for Reconsideration together and questioned whether each could be voted separately. The Moderator stated that there were two parts of the process. The first was the presentation and debate whether there was enough new information to warrant reopening the Article. The same reason was being used for I Oe and IOf, and the first vote was whether there was sufficient information to do so. The Moderator stated that if Reconsideration prevails,then the second part of the process would be separate votes on each portion. 11:06 p.m. Noah Michaelson, raised a Point of Order that due to the late hour, whether the Moderator would entertain a Motion to adjourn the meeting until April 25,2022. The Moderator noted that if he wished to do so,he should combine the Motion with a Motion to Table Ms. Singh's Motion and adjourn until Monday,the 25h at 7:30 p.m. 11:08 P.M. James Malloy, Town Manager, stated that he wished to point out that staff had been waiting 4 hours for the Motions to Reconsider and asked Members to consider this before voting. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Lav on the Table and Adiourn Adopted on a vote of: Yes No Abstain 80 79 7 MOTION CARRIES 11:11 P.M. Michael Boudett,raised a Point of Order that he had hoped to change his vote after Mr.Malloy spoke and wasn't able to. The Moderator noted that she had allowed time to do this,including by raised hands,so the vote would stand. The Moderator noted that the Annual Town Meeting to was adjourned to Monday,April 25,2022,such meeting to be held remotely. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. April 25,2022 Adiourned Session of the 2022 Annual Town Meeting Moderator Deborah Brown called the seventh session of 2022 Annual Town Meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.on Monday,April 25,2022.The meeting was held remotely as voted by order of the Select Board and request of the Moderator. 7:30 p.m. The Moderator welcomed Meeting Members and members of the public and gave a brief reminder of how to submit a statement for or against an Article to the website. 7:32 p.m. The Moderator called for attendance. 7:35 p.m. The Moderator noted that that quorum had been achieved and reminded Members that if they had technical issues,they could contact staff to assist them. She then explained the process for Reconsideration,stating that the first step is serving notice,which was achieved on March 30,2022,which basically alerts the Meeting that it might be brought back. The second step is to vote on whether or not reconsideration should take place. She noted that this meant that there was sufficient new information presented that might cause someone to change their vote.If there was a majority vote of"yes",then the Meeting would reopen the item with the main motion for each of the Articles. Because the reason for Reconsideration was the same for each,the first vote would be for both, but if they were allowed to be considered each vote would be separate. She also reminded Members that the discussion on Reconsideration would be limited to 30 minutes,in the same way Amendments were handled. 7:38 p.m. Ms.Hai moves that Reconsideration of Articles I Oe and IOf be Taken from the Table. The Moderator noted that unless there were objections,she would consider this a voice vote. As there were no objections the motion unanimously carries. The Moderator noted that she would allow Ms. Singh to move the Articles for Reconsideration. 7:40 p.m. Taylor Singh,moves Reconsideration of Articles I Oe and IOf. Ms. Singh noted that on April I Ph the Meeting had heard a clear statement of what was on the table for the new LHS. She stated that this information was not widely-relayed prior to the meeting and is was worthy of a vote for Reconsideration and said that there were three new information points which presented themselves recently: 1) The timeline for the known footprint of the new LHS. Only discovered during debate of Article l Of after I Oe had been closed and voted. She said that Dr.Hackett had mentioned that the new footprint for LH S should be known in 1 year and nine months. The new bathroom would take a year to build,which meant that in months, not in years or a year after being completed,they could learn that the facility would be within the footprint of or adjacent to the new LHS and not in an ideal location and possibly demolished or designed around. 2) There was a meeting of the Center Recreation Working Group Meeting on March 29'',via Zoom,but if you could not attend,a person would not be able to view it until April 4h,after Town Meeting had voted on I Oe and l Of.At the meeting, viewers could hear the Superintendent and Select Board Member Doug Lucente encouraging the group not to take anything off the table. She said that Dr.Hackett stated,"What if there were no limitations. Where would we place the School?"and encouraged the group to think from all perspectives. Ms. Singh noted that Mr. Lucente stated that,"Now is not the time to take anything off the table". 3) The Director of Public Facilities,Mr.Cronin,stated on April I Ph that"everything is on the table"and that"the entire green space from the courts from Waltham Street is a potential siting for the new LHS"was a very clear statement,heard by all two weeks ago. Ms. Singh stated that she wanted to give the opportunity to everyone to judge based on all the available information and felt that the overwhelming message from the Boards and Committees was that there would be no interference but at no time had they acknowledged that all options were on the table. Although reassured as"unlikely" to build upon the space where the public structures currently sat,there was enough qualitative information a few weeks later that made it worthy to intervene and re-debate on what was now known. Ms. Singh stated that this might cause Members to vote differently than before as there had been information on the Town Meeting Members March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. site stating that Members were not aware that these areas had not been officially ruled out prior to voting on them. She added that to vote to not Reconsider was to be cavalier with tax payers funds than she was comfortable with,especially as the Town was headed to the first of two upcoming debt exclusion votes. She encouraged Members to vote"yes"for Reconsideration on I Oe and l Of. 7:45 p.m. Lisah Rhodes,Member of the Recreation Committee,noted that the Recreation Committee reaffirmed their support of I Oe and IOf and they did not believe that any new information for the purposes of Reconsideration was warranted. The projects had a process vetting prior to being presented at Town Meeting had been thorough and complete and had gained the unanimous support of the Appropriation Committee, Capital Expense Committee,and a majority of the Select Board and the Community Preservation Committee. She noted that the Articles were the result of many meetings, community input and public feedback,and the projects had been posted on the website, as well as all meetings having been open publicly posted meetings. She stated that although they recognized the concerns that were brought up regarding the possible impacts of the LHS project,including potential siting of a new building,it was thought to be unlikely that the property would be a candidate for the site as they were located on the public/private property line as well as the consideration of the significant challenges of navigating Article 97. Ms.Rhodes also stated that the issues raised in the motion to Reconsider—namely the timeline for the LHS feasibility and potential siting were discussed during debate on March 30. She noted that while noise issues were not raised on the Motion to Reconsider,they had been working closely with abutting neighbors since December 2020 to address their concerns with noise at multiple Recreation Committee meetings,in-person visits on site,and at each of the two public committee meetings that had been held so far and they had been working to find compromise on solutions that would mitigate noise while maintaining recreation opportunities for others in the community. She then gave an overview of the Recreation response to the email of January 13,2022. Ms.Rhodes stated that by delaying the project until the feasibility study was done would equate to a delay of multiple years,not months,likely pushing the start of the project to 2025-approximately 9 years past the life expectancy of the courts. She noted that given the rate of deterioration and high resident usage,it was anticipated that the courts would not be able to operate at that capacity for that duration of time and closures would be required for safety reasons. 7:42 p.m. Jill Hai,Select Board Chair,noted that the Select Board had met that evening to discuss the issue and that James Malloy,Town Manager,had provided a summary of the various issues and restrictions which govern the use of the land comprising the recreation complex and the school land. She noted that while the Select Board completely respected the different opinions on the underlying issues of l0e and l Of,the majority of the Board failed to see any new information which was not available before the vote. She stated that Mr.Pato's grounds for dissenting,both for the Select Board vote and the CPC vote was stated and published in the CPC Report and clearly said that it was concerns regarding eventual siting of the high school and his preference to wait until the feasibility study was completed before funding for either project and that Ms.Lenihan had stated in the School Committee Report to Town Meeting under I Oe that there might be uncertainty for siting of the high school,but there was no uncertainty for the need of the facility. Under l Of she reiterated the School Committee's unanimous support with the same caveats expressed under 10e. She further noted that many Members who had spoken mentioned the possibly impact of the high school project as grounds for concern or as something overridden by the need for the facility. She stated that the Select Board had voted 3 in favor and abstaining,the Select Board opposed Reconsideration. Charles Lamb,Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee stated that the Capital Expenditures Committee had voted 4-0 against Reconsideration. Eric Michaelson,Member of the Appropriations Committee stated that the Appropriations Committee had voted 1-6 to not recommend proceeding with Reconsideration 7:54 p.m. The Meeting was opened for discussion and debate. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Andrei Radulsecu-Banu,Pct. 8,stated that the pine trees lining the side of the tennis and pool area,and said that there were 37 trees,approximately 60-70 years old and when the debated resurfacing and during a site visit,no one had said they would be cut down, even though they appeared healthy. He further stated that the DPW had an arborist to inspect the trees,but instead of creating a plan to preserve the trees,the arborist had said they should be cut,but when speaking to the Town Manager,he had been advised that whether the trees were cut or not,it was unrelated to the resurfacing. 7:59 p.m. David Kanter,Pct. 7,raised a Point of Order that the labeling on the screen only showed one of the items to be Reconsidered. The Moderator thanked Mr.Kanter for pointing it out and asked if the description on the slide could be altered,without affecting those in line. Mr.Pato noted that it would disturb the lines and asked for it to stand. The Moderator stated that both I Oe and l Of were being considered under the same reason,and asked Town Meeting Members to keep that in mind. 8:00 P.M. Mark Andersen,Pct.9,asked that more clarification be given regarding the tree removal mentioned beforehand,and asked if the Town Manager could give his perspective on the subject. Jim Malloy,Town Manager,stated that there was no correlation between the tree removal and the tennis courts. He explained that the Town was required to act when they were put on notice that there was a hazard or defect,as if they didn't they could be found negligent,which would affect their limited liability clause. He further stated that the Town could have a large liability if one of the trees came down and fell on something or someone,so they were required to address the situation. Mr.Andersen followed up by asking what the expected course of action would be and whether the Select Board and/or Recreation Committee felt that this played into the decision for Reconsideration or was an independent issue. Mr.Malloy stated that the DPW had been working with the abutters,and asked for David Pinsonneault to be recognized. Mr.Pinsonneault noted that the responsibility of trees in the right of way was overseen by the Tree Warden through Chapter 87 of Mass General Law. He further stated that in this situation,there were two arborists with differing opinions and they were working to get a secondary report which they hadn't yet seen,and any planting in the area was completely separate from the projects mentioned. They had received a request to review the trees from the neighborhood, which was done,but did cause a disagreement that they were working through. They had also held a public meeting in order to address the meeting,but again it wasn't related to these issues. 8:03 p.m. Scott Burson,Pct.9,raised a Point of Order that the questions regarding the trees be considered out of order. The Moderator stated that she had allowed it and that shining light on a question where there had been some confusion was helpful. 8:04 p.m. Kathryn Colburn,Pct.4,stated her support for Reconsideration and hoped the projects would be postponed until the high school site had been chosen. She further stated that conversations regarding preservation of the trees should continue. 8:07 p.m. Rodney Cole,Pct.9,stated that historically there had been a definitive line on whether Reconsideration should happen,mostly that there was significant new information,and that he disagreed with it in this instance as there had been numerous reports including the CPC report that acknowledged there was some chance,but highly unlikely,that the school building project would impact l0e and l Of. He stated that there was no new information and that the possibility was still unlikely,which was not a change. 8:09 P.M. Scott Burson,Pct. 9,said that he echoed Mr. Cole's comments as he did not believe there was any new information. 8:10 P.M. The Moderator noted that the 30 minutes for discussion of Reconsideration had passed and asked Ms. Singh for any summary comments. March 28,2022 Annual and Special Town Meetings(2022-1 and 2022-2),cont. Ms. Singh stated that a large amount of energy would be focused on the LHS project in the next few years and that they needed to be able to explain reasons for voting a certain way when seeking approval from all voters when the time for a debt exclusion vote came up. She thanked the Members for their time and consideration. 8:11 P.M. The Moderator opened the portal for voting on Reconsideration. Following remote electronic vote tallying,the Moderator declared that: Motion to Reconsider 10e and 10f Fails by a vote of: Yes No Abstain 67 104 5 MOTION FAILS The Moderator thanked the Town Meeting Members for their participation and noted that all business had been completed. 8:18 P.M. Jill Hai,Select Board Chair moved to dissolve Annual Town Meeting 2022.Motion Adopted. A true copy. Attest pp Ma de Alderete,Town Clerk Online Annual Town Meeting 2021 On March 2S,2022 Attendance Check-in:Check-in Approve-Virtual:Approve the STM1-2: STM 1-3: ATM-3: ATM-5:Appropriate ATM-9:Establish Use of Remote Technology Appropriate for Indefinitely Appointments FY2023 Enterprise and Continue Police Station Postpone(IP) to Cary Lecture Funds Budgets Departmental Construction Series Revolving Funds Pct Name ID 0 Mike Barrett 14 0 Suzanne Barry 13 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 Deborah Brown 6 Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain 0 Michelle Ciccolo 12 0 Jill Hai 11 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 Douglas Lucente 7 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 Joe Pato 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 Mark Sandeen 10 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Lois Angelo 405 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 John Bartenstein 40 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Sandhya Beebee 45 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Robert Cunha 47 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Larry Freeman 48 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Tanya Gisolfi-McCready 325 Abstain Yes Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Yes 1 Yifang Gong 301 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Stephanie Hsu 415 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Janet Kern 303 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Jay Luker 414 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Hongbin Luo 50 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Eric Michelson 41 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Noah Michelson 173 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Meg Muckenhoupt 42 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Valerie Overton 52 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Katherine Reynolds 402 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 John Rossi 54 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Carol Sampson 56 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain 1 Bella Tsvetkova 58 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Albert Zabin 61 Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes 1 Judith Zabin 62 Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Avram Baskin 63 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally Yes 2 Marian Cohen 64 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Matthew Cohen 65 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Matt Daggett 66 Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Abstain 2 Rita Goldberg 69 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Ajay Joseph 70 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Online Annual Town Meeting 2021 On March 28,2022 Attendance Check-in:Check-in Approve-Virtual:Approve the STM1-2: STM 1-3: ATM-3: ATM-5:Appropriate ATM-9:Establish Use of Remote Technology Appropriate for Indefinitely Appointments FY2023 Enterprise and Continue Police Station Postpone(IP) to Cary Lecture Funds Budgets Departmental Construction Series Revolving Funds 2 Barbara Katzenberg 305 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Ingrid Klimoff 71 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Paul Lapointe 72 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Peter Lee 73 Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Mark Manasas 74 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Barry Orenstein 31 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Ricki Pappo 77 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Syed Rizvi 78 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Kenneth Shine 79 No Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Juan Stella 80 Yes Yes No Yes Yes 2 Jonathan Suber 81 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Rita Vachani 306 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Emilie Webster 321 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Amy Weinstock 304 Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes 2 Betsey Weiss 82 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Bronte Abraham 434 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Courtney Apgar 83 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Joshua Apgar 257 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Cynthia Arens 84 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Delanot Bastien 290 Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes Verbally 3 Sallye Bleiberg 416 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Christopher Buenrostro 417 Abstain Yes Yes Abstain Abstain 3 Tom Diaz 427 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Edward Dolan 309 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Steven Heinrich 87 Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes 3 Jeanne Krieger 91 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Henry Lau 93 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Rena Maliszewski 94 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Amelia ODonnell 307 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Glenn Parker 37 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Letha Prestbo 96 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Robert Rotberg 97 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Michael Schanbacher 98 Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes 3 Prashant Singh 308 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Frank Smith 99 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Stanley Yap 102 Yes Yes Yes Online Annual Town Meeting 2021 On March 28,2022 Attendance Check-in:Check-in Approve-Virtual:Approve the STM1-2: STM 1-3: ATM-3: ATM-5:Appropriate ATM-9:Establish Use of Remote Technology Appropriate for Indefinitely Appointments FY2023 Enterprise and Continue Police Station Postpone(IP) to Cary Lecture Funds Budgets Departmental Construction Series Revolving Funds 4 Alessandro Alessandrini 103 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Laura Atlee 311 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Nyles Barnert 104 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Gloria Bloom 105 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Michael Boudett 124 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Lawrence Chan 107 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Norman Cohen 108 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Robert Cohen 109 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Kathryn Colburn 110 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Katie Cutler 111 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Eileen Jay 114 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Charles Lamb 115 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Kathleen Lenihan 116 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Linda Liu 419 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Wendy Manz 246 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Gerald Paul 119 Abstain Yes Yes Yes 4 Jenny Richlin 326 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Kathryn Roy 420 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Sandra Shaw 120 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Nancy Shepard 121 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Ruth Thomas 123 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Anil Ahuja 125 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Robert Balaban 126 Yes Yes Yes 5 Nancy Corcoran-Ronchetti 127 Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally 5 Judy Crocker 128 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Irene Dondley 129 Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Marilyn Fenollosa 130 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Andrew Friedlich 131 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Anthony Galaitsis 132 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Sarah Higginbotham 313 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Salvador Jaramillo 322 Yes Yes I Yes Abstain Yes I Yes I Yes 5 Aneesha Karody 145 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Steven Kaufman 134 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Pamela Lyons 135 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Jerold Michelson 136 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Rita Pandey 138 Online Annual Town Meeting 2021 On March 28,2022 Attendance Check-in:Check-in Approve-Virtual:Approve the STM1-2: STM 1-3: ATM-3: ATM-5:Appropriate ATM-9:Establish Use of Remote Technology Appropriate for Indefinitely Appointments FY2023 Enterprise and Continue Police Station Postpone(IP) to Cary Lecture Funds Budgets Departmental Construction Series Revolving Funds 5 Marc SaintLouis 139 Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes 5 Melanie Thompson 140 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Masha Traber 141 Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Lin Xu 143 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Lily Yan 43 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 John Zhao 144 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Sara BothwellAllen 147 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Margaret Counts-Klebe 149 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Jodia Finnagan 315 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Andrea Fribush 151 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Edmund Grant 152 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Jonathan Himmel 153 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Frederic Johnson 154 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Mort Kahan 155 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Jyotsna Kakullavarapu 259 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Brian Kelley 156 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Rina Kodendera 158 Yes Yes 6 Innessa Manning 159 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Bridger McGaw 160 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Dawn McKenna 161 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Ramesh Nallavolu 314 6 Dinesh Patel 163 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Deepika Sawhney 164 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Taylor Singh 212 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Deborah Strod 165 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Eran Strod 421 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Vinita Verma 166 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Marsha Baker 194 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Christian Boutwell 148 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Mary Burnell 196 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Patricia Costello 197 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Robert Creech 198 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Sara Cuthbertson 329 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Harry Forsdick 200 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Mary Hamilton 201 7 Philip Hamilton 202 Online Annual Town Meeting 2021 On March 28,2022 Attendance Check-in:Check-in Approve-Virtual:Approve the STM1-2: STM 1-3: ATM-3: ATM-5:Appropriate ATM-9:Establish Use of Remote Technology Appropriate for Indefinitely Appointments FY2023 Enterprise and Continue Police Station Postpone(IP) to Cary Lecture Funds Budgets Departmental Construction Series Revolving Funds 7 Stacey Hamilton 203 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Pam Hoffman 204 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 David Kanter 267 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 7 Vikas Kinger 205 7 Ravish Kumar 206 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Samita Mandelia 207 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Raul Marques-Pascual 208 Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Tina McBride 209 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Leonard Morse-Fortier 317 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Robert Peters 210 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Umesh Shelat 211 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Pamela Tames 316 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Robert Avallone 214 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Becky Barrentine 215 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 8 Lauren Black 216 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Victoria Buckley 177 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Shailesh Chandra 217 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Gang Chen 218 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Margaret Coppe 240 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Margaret Enders 219 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Alix Fox 423 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Betty Gau 220 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Lin Jensen 222 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Alan Levine 39 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Brielle Meade 224 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 James Osten 225 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Sanjay Padaki 38 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Dahua Pan 324 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Andrei Radulescu-Banu 226 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Sudhir Ranjan 422 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Wendy Reasenberg 227 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Jessie Steigerwald 228 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes I Yes 8 Weidong Wang 230 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Alice Adler 233Yes Verbally 9 Mark Andersen 146 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain 9 Hemaben Bhatt 234 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Online Annual Town Meeting 2021 On March 28,2022 Attendance Check-in:Check-in Approve-Virtual:Approve the STM1-2: STM 1-3: ATM-3: ATM-5:Appropriate ATM-9:Establish Use of Remote Technology Appropriate for Indefinitely Appointments FY2023 Enterprise and Continue Police Station Postpone(IP) to Cary Lecture Funds Budgets Departmental Construction Series Revolving Funds 9 Victoria Blier 235 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Scott Bokun 236 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Scott Burson 319 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Jeanne Canale 237 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Richard Canale 238 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Rodney Cole 239 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Thomas Fenn 241 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Mollie Garberg 242 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Kimberly Hensle-Lowrance 320 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Philip Jackson 243 No Yes Yes Yes I Yes Yes Yes 9 Ethan Kiczek 433 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Sue Kingsbury 428 Yes No Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes 9 Vineeta Kumar 92 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Suzanne Lau 244 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Janet Perry 176 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Lisah Rhodes 249 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Michael Schroeder 426 9 Thomas Shiple 250 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Total I=Yes 142 177 174 179 179 179 178 Total 2=No 13 3 1 0 1 0 1 Tota l3=Abstain 22 1 6 5 1 3 5 Total Voters 177 181 181 184 181 182 184 Pass/Fail Pass I Pass I Pass Pass Pass I Pass Pass On March 30,2022 ATM-10e:CPA- ATM-CA:Consent Agenda(Articles 6,8, Center 10a,10c,10d,10g,10h,10j,10k 101,10m, ATM-10e- Playground ATM-10f- ATM-10f:CPA- 10n,11,12d,12e,12f,12g,12h,121,12j, ATM-10b:CPA Terminate- Bathrooms and Terminate- Playground 12k,121,12m,12r,12s,12t,13,14,15,16a, -Wright Farm Debate: Maintenance Debate: Improvements-ATM-101:CPA ATM-4:Appropriate FY2023 16b,16c,16d,16e,16f,17,18,20,22,23, Barn Previous Building Previous Hard Court -Lincoln Park Attendance Check-in:Check-in Operating Budget 29,32,33,36,40) Stabilization Question Renovation Question Surfaces Master Plan Pct Name ID 0 Mike Barrett 14 0 Suzanne Barry 13 Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes 0 Deborah Brown 6 Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain 0 Michelle Ciccolo 12 0 Jill Hai 11 Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes 0 Douglas Lucente 7 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes 0 Joe Pato 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain No Abstain No Yes 0 Mark Sandeen 10 Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes 1 Lois Angelo 405 1 John Bartenstein 40 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Sandhya Beebee 45 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Robert Cunha 47 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Larry Freeman 48 Abstain Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Tanya Gisolf-McCready 325 Abstain Yes Yes Yes No Yes Abstain Abstain Yes 1 Yifang Gong 301 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 1 Stephanie Hsu 415 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes 1 Janet Kern 303 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 Jay Luker 414 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 1 Hongbin Luo 50 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 Eric Michelson 41 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Noah Michelson 173 Yes Yes 1 Meg Muckenhoupt 42 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 1 Valerie Overton 52 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes 1 Katherine Reynolds 402 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 John Rossi 54 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 1 Carol Sampson 56 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Bella Tsvetkova 58 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Albert Zabin 61 Yes Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Judith Zabin 62 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 2 Avram Baskin 63 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes 2 Marian Cohen 64 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 2 Matthew Cohen 65 2 Matt Daggett 66 Abstain Yes Verbally Yes Yes No Abstain No Abstain Yes 2 Rita Goldberg 69 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Ajay Joseph 70 Yes Yes No Yes Yes 2 Barbara Katzenberg 305 Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Abstain Yes 2 Ingrid Klimoff 71 Abstain Yes Yes No Yes Yes 2 Paul Lapointe 72 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2Peter Lee 73 2 Mark Manasas 74 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 jBarry Orenstein 31 Abstain Yes Yes Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain On March 30,2022 ATM-10e:CPA- ATM-CA:Consent Agenda(Articles 6,8, Center 10a,10c,10d,10g,10h,10j,10k 101,10m, ATM-10e- Playground ATM-10f- ATM-10f:CPA- 10n,11,12d,12e,12f,12g,12h,121,12j, ATM-10b:CPA Terminate- Bathrooms and Terminate- Playground 12k,121,12m,12r,12s,12t,13,14,15,16a, -Wright Farm Debate: Maintenance Debate: Improvements-ATM-101:CPA ATM-4:Appropriate FY2023 16b,16c,16d,16e,16f,17,18,20,22,23, Barn Previous Building Previous Hard Court -Lincoln Park Attendance Check-in:Check-in Operating Budget 29,32,33,36,40) Stabilization Question Renovation Question Surfaces Master Plan 2 Rick!Pappo 77 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 2 Syed R1.1 78 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 2 Kenneth Shine 79 No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Abstain 2 Juan Stella 80 Yes Yes Yes No 2 Jonathan Suber 81 Abstain Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 2 Rita Vachani 306 Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Emilie Webster 321 Abstain Yes Yes Yes No Abstain No No Yes 2 Amy Weinstock 304 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Betsey Weiss 82 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 3 Bronte Abraham 434 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 3 Courtney Apgar 83 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 3 Joshua Apgar 257 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 3 Cynthia Arens 84 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Abstain Yes 3 Delanot Bastien 290 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Verbally 3 Sallye Bleoerg 416 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes 3 Christopher Buenrostro 417 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Abstain Abstain Yes 3 Tom Diaz 427 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes 3 Edward Dolan 309 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 3 Steven Heinrich 87 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 3 Jeanne Krieger 91 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes 3 IHenry Lau 93 3 Rena Maliszewski 94 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Amelia ODonnell 307 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes 3 Glenn Parker 37 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Letha Prestbo 96 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Robert Rotberg 97 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes 3 Michael Schanbacher 98 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 3 Prashant Singh 308 3 Frank Smith 99 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 3 Stanley Yap 102 4 Alessandro Alessandrin! 103 4 Laura Atlee 311 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Nyles Barnert 104 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Gloria Bloom 105 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes 4 Michael Boudett 124 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Lawrence Chan 107 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Norman Cohen 108 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Robert Cohen 109 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Kathryn Colburn 110 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes 4 Katie Cutler 111 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes 4 Elleen Jay 114 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 4 Cha res Lamb 115 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes On March 30,2022 ATM-10e:CPA- ATM-CA:Consent Agenda(Articles 6,8, Center 10a,10c,10d,10g,10h,10j,10k 101,10m, ATM-10e- Playground ATM-10f- ATM-10f:CPA- 10n,11,12d,12e,12f,12g,12h,121,12j, ATM-10b:CPA Terminate- Bathrooms and Terminate- Playground 12k,121,12m,12r,12s,12t,13,14,15,16a, -Wright Farm Debate: Maintenance Debate: Improvements-ATM-101:CPA ATM-4:Appropriate FY2023 16b,16c,16d,16e,16f,17,18,20,22,23, Barn Previous Building Previous Hard Court -Lincoln Park Attendance Check-in:Check-in Operating Budget 29,32,33,36,40) Stabilization Question Renovation Question Surfaces Master Plan 4 Kathleen Lenihan 116 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 4 Linda Liu 419 Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Wendy Manz 246 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Gerald Paul 119 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 4 Jenny Richlin 326 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes 4 Kathryn Roy 420 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 4 Sandra Shaw 120 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Nancy Shepard 121 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes 4 Ruth Thomas 123 Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Verbally No Yes 5 Anil Ahuja 125 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 5 Robert Balaban 126 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Nancy Corcoran-Roncheth 127 Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally 5 Judy Crocker 128 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 5 Irene Dondley 129 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Marilyn Fenollosa 130 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Andrew Friedlich 131 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 5 Anthony Galaitsis 132 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Sarah Higginbotham 313 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes 5 Salvador Jaramillo 322 5 Aneesha Karody 145 5 Steven Kaufman 134 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Pamela Lyons 135 Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Jerold Michelson 136 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Rita Pandey 138 5 Marc Saintiouis 139 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes 5 Melanie Thompson 140 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 5 Masha Traber 141 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 5 Lin%u 143 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes 5 Lily Yan 43 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 5 John Zhao 144 Abstain Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes 6 Sara BothwellAllen 147 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Abstain No Yes 6 Margaret Counts-Klebe 149 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 6 Jodia Finnagan 315 Yes Yes No No Yes Abstain No Yes 6 Andrea Fribush 151 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Edmund Grant 152 Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Jonathan Himmel 153 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Abstain No No Yes 6 Frederic Joh nson 154 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 6 Mort Kahan 155 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes 6 lyotsna Kakullavarapu 259 Yes 6 an Kelley 156 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Rina Kodendera 158 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Abstain 6 linnessa Manning 159 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes On March 30,2022 ATM-10e:CPA- ATM-CA:Consent Agenda(Articles 6,8, Center 10a,10c,10d,10g,10h,10j,10k 101,10m, ATM-10e- Playground ATM-10f- ATM-10f:CPA- 10n,11,12d,12e,12f,12g,12h,121,12j, ATM-10b:CPA Terminate- Bathrooms and Terminate- Playground 12k,121,12m,12r,12s,12t,13,14,15,16a, -Wright Farm Debate: Maintenance Debate: Improvements-ATM-101:CPA ATM-4:Appropriate FY2023 16b,16c,16d,16e,16f,17,18,20,22,23, Barn Previous Building Previous Hard Court -Lincoln Park Attendance Check-in:Check-in Operating Budget 29,32,33,36,40) Stabilization Question Renovation Question Surfaces Master Plan 6 Bridger McGaw 160 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Abstain Yes 6 Dawn McKenna 161 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Ramesh Nallavolu 314 Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Dinesh Patel 163 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No 6 Deepika Sawhney 164 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 6 Taylor Singh 212 Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally No No No No Abstain 6 Deborah Strod 165 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes 6 Era Strod 421 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 6 Vinita Verma 166 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 7 Marsha Baker 194 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Christian Boutwell 148 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Mary Burnell 196 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Patricia Costello 197 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Robert Creech 198 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes No Yes 7 Sara Cuthbertson 329 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 7 Harry Forsdick 200 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Mary Hamilton 201 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Philip Hamilton 202 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Stacey Hamilton 203 Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Abstain Yes 7 Pam Hoffman 204 7 David Kanter 267 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes 7 Vikas Kinger 205 7 Ravish Kumar 206 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Samita Mandelia 207 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 7 Raul Marques-Pascual 208 Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Tina McBride 209 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Abstain No Yes 7 Leonard Morse-Fortier 317 Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Robert Peters 210 Abstain Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 7 Umesh Shelat 211 Abstain No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes 7 Pamela Tames 316 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Abstain Yes 8 RobertAvallone 214 Abstain Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes 8 Becky Barrentine 215 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Lauren Black 216 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Victoria Buckley 177 Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes 8 Shailesh Chandra 217 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes 8 Gang Chen 218 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 8 Margaret Coupe 240 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 8 Margaret Enders 219 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Alix Fox 423 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes 8 Betty Gan 220 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes 82Jensen 222 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No 8 AlLian Levine 39 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes On March 30,2022 ATM-10e:CPA- ATM-CA:Consent Agenda(Articles 6,8, Center 10a,10c,10d,10g,10h,10j,10k 101,10m, ATM-10e- Playground ATM-10f- ATM-10f:CPA- 10n,11,12d,12e,12f,12g,12h,121,12j, ATM-10b:CPA Terminate- Bathrooms and Terminate- Playground 12k,121,12m,12r,12s,12t,13,14,15,16a, -Wright Farm Debate: Maintenance Debate: Improvements-ATM-101:CPA ATM-4:Appropriate FY2023 16b,16c,16d,16e,16f,17,18,20,22,23, Barn Previous Building Previous Hard Court -Lincoln Park Attendance Check-in:Check-in Operating Budget 29,32,33,36,40) Stabilization Question Renovation Question Surfaces Master Plan 8 Brielle Meade 224 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 8 James Osten 225 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 8 Sanjay Padaki 38 Abstain Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes 8 Dahua Pan 324 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 8 Andrei Radulescu-Banu 226 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 8 Sudhir Ranjan 422 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Wendy Reasenberg 227 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 8 Jessie Steigerwald 228 Yes No Yes No No 8 Weidong Wang 230 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 9 Alice Adler 233 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 9 Mark Andersen 146 Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes No Yes Yes 9 Hemaben Bhatt 234 No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes 9 Victoria Blier 235 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes 9 Scott Bokun 236 No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Scott Burson 319 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 9 Jeanne Canale 237 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 9 Richard Canale 238 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes 9 Rodney Cole 239 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Thomas Fenn 241 Abstain Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Mollie Garberg 242 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Kimberly Hensle-Lowrance 320 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes 9 Philip Jackson 243 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Ethan Kiczek 433 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Sue Kingsbury 428 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Vineeta Kumar 92 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes 9 Suzanne Lau 244 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Abstain 9 Janet Perry 176 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Lisah Rhodes 249 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Michael Schroeder 426 Yes Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally 9 Thomas Shiple 250 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes 143 177 172 168 110 146 90 79 152 6 2 3 5 53 19 63 74 3 24 1 2 2 10 8 14 13 6 173 180 177 175 173 173 167 166 161 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass On April 4,2022 ATM-12a- ATM-12c: Amend- South Daggett: Lexington Hartwell ATM-12a: ATM-126: and Forbes- ATM-12n- ATM-12p: ATM-7: District Hartwell Townwide Marrett Terminate- ATM-12n:Battle ATM-12o: Public Parking Attendance Appropriate Signage District Pedestrian Traffic Debate: Green Municipal Lot ATM-12q: Check-in:Check for Climate Limited to Signage(as and Bicycle Mitigation Previous Streetscape Parking Lot Improvement New Sidewalk in Action Plan Area Safety Amended) Plan Plans Question Improvements Improvements Program Design Pct IName ID 0 Mike Barrett 14 0 Suzanne Barry 13 Yes Yes No Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 Deborah Brown 6 Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain 0 Michelle Ciccolo 12 0 Jill Hai 11 Yes Yes No Abstain Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 Douglas Lucente 7 Yes Yes No Abstain Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 Joe Pato 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 Mark Sandeen 10 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Abstain Yes 1 Lois Angelo 405 1 John Bartenstein 40 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Sandhya Beebee 45 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Robert Cunha 47 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Larry Freeman 48 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Tanya Gisolfi-McCready 325 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain 1 Yifang Gong 301 Yes Abstain No Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes No 1 Stephanie Hsu 415 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally Yes Verbally 1 Janet Kern 303 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 1 Ijay Luker 414 Yes I Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Hongbin Luo 50 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 Eric Michelson 41 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Noah Michelson 173 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Meg Muckenhoupt 42 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Valerie Overton 52 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Katherine Reynolds 402 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 John Rossi 54 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 1 Carol Sampson 56 Yes Yes Abstain No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 1 1 Bella Tsvetkova 58 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Albert Zabin 61 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally Yes Yes 1 Judith Zabin 62 Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Avram Baskin 63 Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Marian Cohen 64 Yes Yes Abstain Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Matthew Cohen 65 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Matt Daggett 66 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes No Yes Abstain Abstain Yes 2 Rita Goldberg 69 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Ajay Joseph 70 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Barbara Katze nberg 305 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 2 Ingrid Klimoff 71 Abstain Yes No Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes On April 4,2022 ATM-12a- ATM-12c: Amend- South Daggett: Lexington Hartwell ATM-12a: ATM-126: and Forbes- ATM-12n- ATM-12p: ATM-7: District Hartwell Townwide Marrett Terminate- ATM-12n:Battle ATM-12o: Public Parking Attendance Appropriate Signage District Pedestrian Traffic Debate: Green Municipal Lot ATM-12q: Check-in:Check for Climate Limited to Signage(as and Bicycle Mitigation Previous Streetscape Parking Lot Improvement New Sidewalk in Action Plan Area Safety Amended) Plan Plans Question Improvements Improvements Program Design Pct IName ID 2 Pau l Lapointe 72 Abstain Yes No No 2 Peter Lee 73 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 2 Mark Manasas 74 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Barry Orenstein 31 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Ricki Pappo 77 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes 2 Syed Rizvi 78 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 2 Kenneth Shine 79 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain 2 Juan Stella 80 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 lJonathan Suber 81 1 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Rita Vachani 306 2 Emilie Webster 321 Abstain Yes Abstain Yes 2 Amy Weinstock 304 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 2 Betsey Weiss 82 Yes Yes No Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Bronte Abraham 434 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Courtney Apgar 83 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Joshua Apgar 257 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Cynthia Arens 84 1 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Abstain 3 IDelanot Bastien 290 Yes Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Yes Abstain Yes Verbally Yes Verbally No Yes Abstain 3 Sallye Bleiberg 416 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes 3 Christopher Buenrostro 417 Yes Yes Abstain Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Tom Diaz 427 3 Edward Dolan 309 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes 3 Steven Heinrich 87 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Jeanne Krieger 91 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Henry Lau 93 Yes No Yes Yes Yes 3 Rena Maliszewski 94 3 jAmelia ODonnell 307 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Glenn Parker 37 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Letha Prestbo 96 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Robert Rotberg 97 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Michael Schanbacher 98 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Prashant Singh 308 3 Frank Smith 99 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Sta nley Yap 102 YesYes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Alessandro Alessandrini 103 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4I Laura Atlee 311 Yes Yes Yes I Yes Yes I Yes Yes I Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Nyles Barnert 104 Yes Yes Yes I Yes Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes Yes Yes Yes On April 4,2022 ATM-12a- ATM-12c: Amend- South Daggett: Lexington Hartwell ATM-12a: ATM-126: and Forbes- ATM-12n- ATM-12p: ATM-7: District Hartwell Townwide Marrett Terminate- ATM-12n:Battle ATM-12o: Public Parking Attendance Appropriate Signage District Pedestrian Traffic Debate: Green Municipal Lot ATM-12q: Check-in:Check for Climate Limited to Signage(as and Bicycle Mitigation Previous Streetscape Parking Lot Improvement New Sidewalk in Action Plan Area Safety Amended) Plan Plans Question Improvements Improvements Program Design Pct IName ID 4 Gloria Bloom 105 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Michael Boudett 124 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 4 Lawrence Chan 107 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Norman Cohen 108 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Robert Cohen 109 Yes Abstain No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Kathryn Colburn 110 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Katie Cutler 111 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Eileen Jay 114 Yes Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 ICharles Lamb 115 Yes I Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Kathleen Lenihan 116 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 4 Linda Liu 419 Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Wendy Manz 246 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Gerald Paul 119 Abstain Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Jenny Richlin 326 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 4 Kathryn Roy 420 Yes Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 4 Sandra Shaw 120 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Nancy Shepard 121 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 IRuth Thomas 123 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Anil Ahuja 125 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Robert Balaban 126 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Nancy Corcoran-Ronchetti 127 Yes Verbally Yes Verbally 5 Judy Crocker 128 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Irene Dondley 129 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Marilyn Fenollosa 130 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Andrew Friedlich 131 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Anthony Galaitsis 132 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 ISarah Higginbotham 313 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 SalvadorJarami llo 322 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Aneesha Karody 145 5 Steven Kaufman 134 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Pamela Lyons 135 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Jerold Michelson 136 Yes Yes No Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Rita Pandey 138 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 5 Marc SaintLouis 139 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Melanie Thompson 140 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Masha Traber 141 1 Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes 1 Yes Yes 5 Lin Xu 143 1 Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Abstain I Abstain I Yes Yes No On April 4,2022 ATM-12a- ATM-12c: Amend- South Daggett: Lexington Hartwell ATM-12a: ATM-126: and Forbes- ATM-12n- ATM-12p: ATM-7: District Hartwell Townwide Marrett Terminate- ATM-12n:Battle ATM-12o: Public Parking Attendance Appropriate Signage District Pedestrian Traffic Debate: Green Municipal Lot ATM-12q: Check-in:Check for Climate Limited to Signage(as and Bicycle Mitigation Previous Streetscape Parking Lot Improvement New Sidewalk in Action Plan Area Safety Amended) Plan Plans Question Improvements Improvements Program Design Pct IName ID 5 Lily Yan 43 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 John Zhao 144 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Sara BothwellAllen 147 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Abstain Yes 6 Margaret Counts-Klebe 149 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 6 Jodia Finnagan 315 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain No Yes 6 Andrea Fribush 151 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Edmund Grant 152 6 Jonathan Himmel 153 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 lFrederic Johnson 154 1 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Mort Kahan 155 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Jyotsna Kakullavarapu 259 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Brian Kelley 156 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Rina Kodendera 158 Yes Yes No Abstain Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Abstain 6 Innessa Manning 159 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Bridger McGaw 160 Yes Yes Abstain Abstain Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes 6 Dawn McKenna 161 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Abstain Yes Yes Yes 6 Ramesh Nallavolu 314 6 Dinesh Patel 163 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Deepika Sawhney 164 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Taylor Singh 212 Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Deborah Strad 165 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Abstain Yes 6 Eran Strad 421 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Vinita Verma 166 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Marsha Baker 194 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Christian Boutwell 148 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Mary Burnell 196 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Patricia Costello 197 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Robert Creech 198 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Abstain Yes 7 Sara Cuthbertson 329 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Harry Forsdick 200 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Mary Hamilton 201 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Philip Hamilton 202 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Stacey Hamilton 203 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Pam Hoffman 204 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes 7 David Kanter 267 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 lVikas Kinger 205 7 Ravish Kumar 206 1 Yes Yes On April 4,2022 ATM-12a- ATM-12c: Amend- South Daggett: Lexington Hartwell ATM-12a: ATM-126: and Forbes- ATM-12n- ATM-12p: ATM-7: District Hartwell Townwide Marrett Terminate- ATM-12n:Battle ATM-12o: Public Parking Attendance Appropriate Signage District Pedestrian Traffic Debate: Green Municipal Lot ATM-12q: Check-in:Check for Climate Limited to Signage(as and Bicycle Mitigation Previous Streetscape Parking Lot Improvement New Sidewalk in Action Plan Area Safety Amended) Plan Plans Question Improvements Improvements Program Design Pct IName ID 7 Samita Mandelia 207 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Raul Marques-Pascual 208 Yes No Yes Yes 7 Tina McBride 209 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Abstain No Yes 7 Leonard Morse-Fortier 317 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Robert Peters 210 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Umesh Shelat 211 No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes 7 Pamela Tames 316 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Robert Avallone 214 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 lBecky Barrentine 215 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Lauren Black 216 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Victoria Buckley 177 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Shailesh Chandra 217 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Gang Chen 218 No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Margaret Coppe 240 Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Margaret Enders 219 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Alix Fox 423 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Betty Gau 220 1 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Lin Jensen 222 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain No Yes 8 Alan Levine 39 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes 8 Brielle Meade 224 No Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 James Osten 225 Abstain Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Sanjay Padaki 38 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Dahua Pan 324 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Andrei Radulescu-Banu 226 Abstain Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Sudhir Radian 422 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Wendy Reasenberg 227 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 JJessie Steigerwald 228 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Weidong Wang 230 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Alice Adler 233 9 Mark Andersen 146 Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Hemaben Bhatt 234 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes YesYes Yes 9 Victoria Blier 235 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Scott Bokun 236 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Scott Burson 319 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Jeanne Canale 237 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Richard Canale 238 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Rodney Cole 239 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes On April 4,2022 ATM-12a- ATM-12c: Amend- South Daggett: Lexington Hartwell ATM-12a: ATM-126: and Forbes- ATM-12n- ATM-12p: ATM-7: District Hartwell Townwide Marrett Terminate- ATM-12n:Battle ATM-12o: Public Parking Attendance Appropriate Signage District Pedestrian Traffic Debate: Green Municipal Lot ATM-12q: Check-in:Check for Climate Limited to Signage(as and Bicycle Mitigation Previous Streetscape Parking Lot Improvement New Sidewalk in Action Plan Area Safety Amended) Plan Plans Question Improvements Improvements Program Design Pct IName ID 9 Thomas Fenn 241 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Mollie Garberg 242 Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Kimberly Hensle-Lowrance 320 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Philip Jackson 243 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Ethan Kiczek 433 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Sue Kingsbury 428 Abstain Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Vineeta Kumar 92 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Suzanne Lau 244 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes 9 jJanet Perry 176 Abstain I Yes Yes I Yes Yes I Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Lisah Rhodes 249 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Michael Schroeder 426 Yes Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally 9 Thomas Shiple 250 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 143 174 116 160 169 173 111 167 162 146 159 11 1 52 9 2 1 48 2 3 15 5 19 4 10 10 3 2 16 4 7 10 6 173 179 178 179 174 176 175 173 172 171 170 Pass I Pass I Pass I Pass I Pass I Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass On April 6,2022 Attendance ATM-27- ATM-27:Zero ATM-28- ATM-28: ATM-26- ATM-26: ATM-16g: ATM-16h- ATM-16h: ATM-19:Establish, ATM-21:Amend ATM-24: Check-in: Terminate- Waste Terminate- Humane Pet Terminate- Appropriate for High School Terminate- Town Pool Amend,Dissolve and FY2022 Adjust Check-in Debate: Resolution Debate: Store Bylaw Debate: Nexus Studies Equipment Debate: Water Heater Appropriate to and Operating, Retirement Previous (Citizen Previous (Citizen Previous (Citizen Petition) Emergency Previous Replacement from Specified Enterprise and Cola Base for Question Petition) Question Petition) Question Funds Question Stabilization Funds CPA Budgets Retirees Pct Name ID 0 Mike Barrett 14 0 Suzanne Barry 13 Yes Abstain Abstain Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes 0 iDeborah Brown 6 1 Abstain Abstain I Abstain Abstain I Abstain Abstain I Abstain Abstain Abstain I Abstain Abstain I Abstain Abstain — 0 Michelle Ciccolo 12 Abstain Yes 0 Jill Hai 11 Yes Abstain Abstain Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes 0 Douglas Lucente 7 Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 Joe Pato 5 Abstain Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 Mark Sandeen 10 Yes No Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Lois Angelo 405 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes 1 John Bartenstein 40 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes 1 Sandhya Beebee 45 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Robert Cunha 47 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Larry Freeman 48 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Tanya Gisolfi-McCready 325 Abstain No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Yifang Gong 301 Yes Yes Yes No Abstain No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 1 Stephanie Hsu 415 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Janet Kern 303 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Jay Luker 414 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Hongbin Luo 50 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 1 Eric Michelson 41 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Noah Michelson 173 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Meg Muckenhoupt 42 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Valerie Overton 52 Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Katherine Reynolds 402 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 John Rossi 54 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Abstain 1 Carol Sampson 56 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 1 Bella Tsvetkova 58 1 Albert Zabin 61 Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally 1 Judith Zabin 62 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Avram Baskin 63 Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Marian Cohen 64 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Matthew Cohen 65 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Matt Daggett 66 Abstain No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Abstain 2 Rita Goldberg 69 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Ajay Joseph 70 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Barbara Katzenberg 305 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Ingrid Klimoff 71 Abstain Abstain Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Paul Lapointe 72 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Peter Lee 73 No Yes Yes Yes Yes ZZ No Yes Yes 2 Mark Manasas 74 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Barry Orenstein 31 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 2 Rick,Pappo 77 Yes No Yes Abstain Yes No Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes On April 6,2022 Attendance ATM-27- ATM-27:Zero ATM-28- ATM-28: ATM-26- ATM-26: ATM-16g: ATM-16h- ATM-16h: ATM-19:Establish, ATM-21:Amend ATM-24: Check-in: Terminate- Waste Terminate- Humane Pet Terminate- Appropriate for High School Terminate- Town Pool Amend,Dissolve and FY2022 Adjust Check-in Debate: Resolution Debate: Store Bylaw Debate: Nexus Studies Equipment Debate: Water Heater Appropriate to and Operating, Retirement Previous (Citizen Previous (Citizen Previous (Citizen Petition) Emergency Previous Replacement from Specified Enterprise and Cola Base for Question Petition) Question Petition) Question Funds Question Stabilization Funds CPA Budgets Retirees Pct Name ID 2 Syed Rizvi 78 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Abstain Yes Yes Yes 2 Kenneth Shine 79 No Abstain Abstain Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes No Yes 2 lJuan Stella 80 1 Yes Yes I Yes Yes I Yes Yes I Yes 2 Jonathan Suber 81 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Rita Vachani 306 2 Emilie Webster 321 Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes Abstain 2 Amy Weinstock 304 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Betsey Weiss 82 Yes Abstain Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Bronte Abraham 434 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Courtney Apgar 83 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Joshua Apgar 257 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Cynthia Arens 84 Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes No Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Delanot Bastien 290 Yes No Yes Verbally No Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally 3 Sallye Bleiberg 416 Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Christopher Buenrostro 417 Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes 3 Tom Diaz 427 No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Edward Dolan 309 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Steven Heinrich 87 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Jeanne Krieger 91 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Henry Lau 93 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Rena Maliszewski 94 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 3 Amelia ODonnell 307 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes 3 Glenn Parker 37 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Letha Prestbo 96 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Robert Rotberg 97 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Michael Schanbacher 98 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Prashant Singh 308 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Frank Smith 99 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Stanley Yap 102 Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 4 Alessandro Alessandrini 103 4 Laura Atlee 311 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Nyle s Barnert 104 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Gloria Bloom 105 Abstain Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Michael Boudett 124 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Lawrence Chan 107 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Norman Cohen 108 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Robert Cohen 109 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Kathryn Colburn 110 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Katie Cutler 111Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Eileen Jay 114 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Charles Lamb 115 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Kathleen Lenihan 116 Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes On April 6,2022 Attendance ATM-27- ATM-27:Zero ATM-28- ATM-28: ATM-26- ATM-26: ATM-16g: ATM-16h- ATM-16h: ATM-19:Establish, ATM-21:Amend ATM-24: Check-in: Terminate- Waste Terminate- Humane Pet Terminate- Appropriate for High School Terminate- Town Pool Amend,Dissolve and FY2022 Adjust Check-in Debate: Resolution Debate: Store Bylaw Debate: Nexus Studies Equipment Debate: Water Heater Appropriate to and Operating, Retirement Previous (Citizen Previous (Citizen Previous (Citizen Petition) Emergency Previous Replacement from Specified Enterprise and Cola Base for Question Petition) Question Petition) Question Funds Question Stabilization Funds CPA Budgets Retirees Pct Name ID 4 Linda Liu 419 Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Wendy Manz 246 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 lGerald Paul 119 1 Yes Yes I Yes Yes I Yes Yes I Yes Yes Yes I Yes Yes I Yes Yes 4 Jenny Richlin 326 Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Kathryn Roy 420 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Sandra Shaw 120 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Nancy Shepard 121 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Ruth Thomas 123 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally 5 Anil Ahuja 125 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Robert Balaban 126 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Nancy Corcoran-Ronchetti 127 Yes Verbally No Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally 5 Judy Crocker 128 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Irene Dondley 129 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Marilyn Fenollosa 130 Abstain No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Andrew Friedlich 131 Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Anthony Galaitsis 132 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Sarah Higginbotham 313 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Salvador Jaramillo 322 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Aneesha Karody 145 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Steven Kaufman 134 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally Yes 5 Pamela Lyons 135 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain 5 Jerold Michelson 136 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Rita Pandey 138 Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Marc SaintLouis 139 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 5 Melanie Thompson 140 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Masha Traber 141 Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes 5 Lin%u 143 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Lily Yan 43 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 John Zhao 144 Abstain No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Sara BothwellAllen 147 Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Margaret Counts-Klebe 149 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Jodia Flanagan 315 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Abstain Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes 6 Andrea Fribush 151 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Edmund Grant 152 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Jonathan Himmel 153 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Frederic Johnson 154 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Mort Kahan 155 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Jyotsna Kakullavarapu 259 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Brian Kelley 156 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Rina Kodendera 158 Yes Verbally No Yes Yes Yes Abstain Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Innessa Manning 159 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Bridger McGaw 160 No Abstain No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes On April 6,2022 Attendance ATM-27- ATM-27:Zero ATM-28- ATM-28: ATM-26- ATM-26: ATM-16g: ATM-16h- ATM-16h: ATM-19:Establish, ATM-21:Amend ATM-24: Check-in: Terminate- Waste Terminate- Humane Pet Terminate- Appropriate for High School Terminate- Town Pool Amend,Dissolve and FY2022 Adjust Check-in Debate: Resolution Debate: Store Bylaw Debate: Nexus Studies Equipment Debate: Water Heater Appropriate to and Operating, Retirement Previous (Citizen Previous (Citizen Previous (Citizen Petition) Emergency Previous Replacement from Specified Enterprise and Cola Base for Question Petition) Question Petition) Question Funds Question Stabilization Funds CPA Budgets Retirees Pct Name ID 6 Dawn McKenna 161 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 6 Ramesh Nallavolu 314 6 lDinesh Patel 163 1 Yes Yes I Yes Yes I Yes Yes I No Yes Yes I Yes Yes I Yes Yes 6 Deepika Sawhney 164 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Taylor Singh 212 Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Deborah Strod 165 Abstain No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Eran Strod 421 No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Vinita Verma 166 No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Marsha Baker 194 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Christian Boutwell 148 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Mary Burnell 196 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Patricia Costello 197 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Robert Creech 198 Abstain No Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Sara Cuthbertson 329 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Harry Forsdick 200 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Mary Hamilton 201 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Philip Hamilton 202 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Stacey Hamilton 203 Abstain Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Pam Hoffman 204 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 David Kanter 267 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Vikas Kinger 205 7 Ravish Kumar 206 Yes No No No Yes 7 Samita Mandolin 207 Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Raul Marques-Pascual 208 No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Tina McBride 209 Yes No Yes Abstain Yes No Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Leonard Morse-Fortier 317 Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Robert Peters 210 Abstain No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Umesh Shelat 211 No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Pamela Tames 316 Yes No Verbally Yes No Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 RobertAvallone 214 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Becky Barrentine 215 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Lauren Black 216 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Victoria Buckley 177 Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Shailesh Chandra 217 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Gang Chen 218 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Margaret Coppe 240 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Margaret Enders 219 8 Alix Fox 423 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Betty Gau 220 No Yes No Yes 8 Lin Jensen 222 Abstain No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Alan Levine 39 No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Brielle Meade 224 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes On April 6,2022 Attendance ATM-27- ATM-27:Zero ATM-28- ATM-28: ATM-26- ATM-26: ATM-16g: ATM-16h- ATM-16h: ATM-19:Establish, ATM-21:Amend ATM-24: Check-in: Terminate- Waste Terminate- Humane Pet Terminate- Appropriate for High School Terminate- Town Pool Amend,Dissolve and FY2022 Adjust Check-in Debate: Resolution Debate: Store Bylaw Debate: Nexus Studies Equipment Debate: Water Heater Appropriate to and Operating, Retirement Previous (Citizen Previous (Citizen Previous (Citizen Petition) Emergency Previous Replacement from Specified Enterprise and Cola Base for Question Petition) Question Petition) Question Funds Question Stabilization Funds CPA Budgets Retirees Pct Name ID 8 James Osten 225 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Sanjay Padaki 38 No No Abstain Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 lDahua Pan 324 1 Yes Yes I Yes Yes I Yes No I Yes Yes Yes I Yes Yes I Yes Yes 8 Andrei Radulescu-Banu 226 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Sudhir Ranjan 422 Yes Yes Yes Abstain Abstain No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Wendy Reasenberg 227 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Jessie Steigerwald 228 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 8 Weidong Wang 230 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Alice Adler 233 9 Mark Andersen 146 Yes No Abstain Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes 9 Hemaben Bhatt 234 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Victoria Blier 235 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Scott Bokun 236 No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Scott Burson 319 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Jeanne Canale 237 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Richard Canale 238 No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally 9 Rodney Cole 239 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Thomas Fenn 241 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Mollie Garberg 242 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Kimberly Hensle-Lowrance 320 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Philip Jackson 243 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Ethan Kiczek 433 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Sue Kingsbury 428 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Vineeta Kumar 92 9 Suzanne Lau 244 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Janet Perry 176 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Lisah Rhodes 249 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Michael Schroeder 426 No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally 9 Thomas Shiple 250 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 136 115 170 137 177 110 168 171 130 161 169 166 166 17 47 4 31 2 55 12 2 29 9 1 1 1 23 16 8 13 5 12 4 5 16 4 4 1 4 176 178 182 181 184 177 184 178 175 174 174 168 171 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass On April 11,2022 ATM-30: STM2-3: ATM-34: Amend STM2-2: STM2-3- Amend STM2-4: Allow for Special Act- ATM-37: Lexington Terminate- ByLaw, Appropriate Select Board Planning Amend High School Debate: Hybrid to Complete to Call Board and Zoning Bylaw Attendance Check- Feasibility Previous Town Comprehensi Remote Town Town -Technical in:Check-in Study Question Meetings ve Plan Meeting Meeting Corrections Pct Name ID 0 Mike Barrett 14 0 Suzanne Barry 13 Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 Deborah Brown 6 Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain 0 Michelle Ciccolo 12 0 Jill Hai 11 Yes Yes Verbally Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 Douglas Lucente 7 Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes No Yes Yes 0 Joe Pato 5 Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes No Yes 0 Mark Sandeen 10 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 Lois Angelo 405 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 John Bartenstein 40 Yes Yes No Verbally Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 Sandhya Beebee 45 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 Robert Cunha 47 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 1 Larry Freeman 48 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 Tanya Gisolfi-McCready 325 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Yifang Gong 301 Yes Yes No Abstain Yes Yes Yes Abstain 1 Stephanie Hsu 415 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 Janet Kern 303 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 Jay Luker 414 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 Hongbin Luo 50 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes — 1 Eric Michelson 41 Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 1 Noah Michelson 173 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 Meg Muckenhoupt 42 1 Valerie Overton 52 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 Katherine Reynolds 402 Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 John Rossi 54 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 Carol Sampson 56 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 Bella Tsvetkova 58 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 Albert Zabin 61 Yes Verbally Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes On April 11,2022 ATM-30: STM2-3: ATM-34: Amend STM2-2: STM2-3- Amend STM2-4: Allow for Special Act- ATM-37: Lexington Terminate- ByLaw, Appropriate Select Board Planning Amend High School Debate: Hybrid to Complete to Call Board and Zoning Bylaw Attendance Check- Feasibility Previous Town Comprehensi Remote Town Town -Technical in:Check-in Study Question Meetings ve Plan Meeting Meeting Corrections Pct Name ID 1 Judith Zabin 62 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes — 2 Avra m Baskin 63 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Marian Cohen 64 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 2 Matthew Cohen 65 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 2 Matt Daggett 66 Abstain Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 2 Rita Goldberg 69 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Ajay Joseph 70 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 2 Barbara Katzenberg 305 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Ingrid Klimoff 71 Abstain Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes — 2 Paul Lapointe 72 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes — 2 Peter Lee 73 2 Mark M anasas 74 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 2 Barry Orenstein 31 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Ricki Pappo 77 Yes Yes No Yes Abstain Yes No Yes 2 Syed Rizvi 78 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 2 Kenneth Shine 79 No Yes Yes No Abstain Yes Verbally No Yes 2 Juan Stella 80 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Jonathan Suber 81 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Rita Vachani 306 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 2 Emilie Webster 321 Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes No Yes 2 Amy Weinstock 304 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 2 Betsey Weiss 82 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Bronte Abraham 434 Yes Yes Yes 3 Courtney Apgar 83 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Joshua Apgar 257 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Cynthia Arens 84 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 3 1 Delanot Bastien 290 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Verbally No Verbally Yes 3 ISallye Bleiberg 14161 Yes Yes No I Yes Yes Yes No Yes On April 11,2022 ATM-30: STM2-3: ATM-34: Amend STM2-2: STM2-3- Amend STM2-4: Allow for Special Act- ATM-37: Lexington Terminate- ByLaw, Appropriate Select Board Planning Amend High School Debate: Hybrid to Complete to Call Board and Zoning Bylaw Attendance Check- Feasibility Previous Town Comprehensi Remote Town Town -Technical in:Check-in Study Question Meetings ve Plan Meeting Meeting Corrections Pct Name ID 3 Christopher Buenrostro 417 Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Abstain 3 Tom Diaz 427 Abstain Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Edward Dolan 309 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 3 Steven Heinrich 87 Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes No Yes 3 Jeanne Krieger 91 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 3 Henry Lau 93 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Rena Maliszewski 94 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 3 Amelia ODonnell 307 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 3 Glenn Parker 37 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 3 Letha Prestbo 96 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes — 3 Robert Rotberg 97 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 3 Michael Schanbacher 98 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Prashant Singh 308 3 Frank Smith 99 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Stanley Yap 102 Yes No Yes 4 Alessandro Alessandrini 103 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 4 Laura Atlee 311 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Nyles Barnert 104 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Abstain Yes Yes 4 Gloria Bloom 105 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 4 Michael Boudett 124 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Lawrence Chan 107 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 4 Norman Cohen 108 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 4 Robert Cohen 109 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain 4 Kathryn Colburn 110 Yes Yes No es Verball Yes Yes No Yes 4 Katie Cutler 111 4 Eileen lay 114 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 4 Charles Lamb 115 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Kathleen Lenihan 11161 Yes Yes I No Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes On April 11,2022 ATM-30: STM2-3: ATM-34: Amend STM2-2: STM2-3- Amend STM2-4: Allow for Special Act- ATM-37: Lexington Terminate- ByLaw, Appropriate Select Board Planning Amend High School Debate: Hybrid to Complete to Call Board and Zoning Bylaw Attendance Check- Feasibility Previous Town Comprehensi Remote Town Town -Technical in:Check-in Study Question Meetings ve Plan Meeting Meeting Corrections Pct Name ID 4 Linda Liu 419 Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes 4 Wendy Manz 246 Yes Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Gerald Paul 119 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 4 Jenny Richlin 326 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 4 Kathryn Roy 420 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Sandra Shaw 1201 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 4 Nancy Shepard 121 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 4 Ruth Thomas 123 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 5 Anil Ahuja 125 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 5 Robert Balaban 126 Yes Yes Yes Ves Verball Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Nancy Corcoran-Ronchetti 127 No Verbally es Verbalh, Yes Verbally Yes Verbally No Verbally No Verbally 5 Judy Crocker 128 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Irene Dondley 129 Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Marilyn Fenollosa 130 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 5 Andrew Friedlich 131 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Anthony Galaitsis 132 Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes No Yes 5 Sarah Higginbotham 313 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 5 Salvadorlaramillo 322 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes 5 Aneesha Karody 145 5 Steven Kaufman 134 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Pamela Lyons 135 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Jerold Michelson 136 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 5 Rita Pandey 138 Yes Yes Yes No Yes 5 Marc SaintLouis 139 Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes 5 Melanie Thompson 140 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Masha Traber 141 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Lin Xu 143 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 5 Lily Yan 43 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes On April 11,2022 ATM-30: STM2-3: ATM-34: Amend STM2-2: STM2-3- Amend STM2-4: Allow for Special Act- ATM-37: Lexington Terminate- ByLaw, Appropriate Select Board Planning Amend High School Debate: Hybrid to Complete to Call Board and Zoning Bylaw Attendance Check- Feasibility Previous Town Comprehensi Remote Town Town -Technical in:Check-in Study Question Meetings ve Plan Meeting Meeting Corrections Pct Name ID 5 John Zhao 144 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 6 Sara BothwellAllen 147 Abstain Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 6 Margaret Counts-Klebe 149 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Jodia Finnagan 315 Yes Yes No Yes Abstain Yes No Abstain 6 Andrea Fribush 151 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 6 Edmund Grant 152 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Jonathan Himmel 153 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 6 Frederic Johnson 154 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Mort Kahan 155 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 6 Jyotsna Kakullavarapu 259 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 6 Brian Kelley 156 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 6 Rina Kodendera 158 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 6 Innessa Manning 159 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 6 Bridger McGaw 160 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 6 Dawn McKenna 161 Yes Verbally Yes Yes No Yes No Verbally Yes 6 Ramesh Nallavolu 314 6 Dinesh Patel 163 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 6 Deepika Sawhney 164 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 6 Taylor Singh 212 Yes Yes Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain No Yes 6 Deborah Strod 165 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 6 Eran Strod 421 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 6 Vinita Verma 166 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Marsha Baker 194 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Christian Boutwell 148 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Mary Burnell 196 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Patricia Costello 197 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Robert Creech 198 Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Sara Cuthbertson 329 Abstain Yes I Yes Yes Yes Verbally No No Yes On April 11,2022 ATM-30: STM2-3: ATM-34: Amend STM2-2: STM2-3- Amend STM2-4: Allow for Special Act- ATM-37: Lexington Terminate- ByLaw, Appropriate Select Board Planning Amend High School Debate: Hybrid to Complete to Call Board and Zoning Bylaw Attendance Check- Feasibility Previous Town Comprehensi Remote Town Town -Technical in:Check-in Study Question Meetings ve Plan Meeting Meeting Corrections Pct Name ID 7 Harry Forsdick 200 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Mary Hamilton 201 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Philip Hamilton 202 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes — 7 Stacey Hamilton 203 Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Pam Hoffman 204 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 David Kanter 267 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Vikas Kinger 205 7 Ravish Kumar 206 7 Samita Mandelia 207 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Raul Marques-Pascual 208 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Tina McBride 209 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Leonard Morse-Fortier 317 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Robert Peters 210 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Umesh Shelat 211 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 7 Pamela Tames 316 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 8 Robert Avallone 214 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 8 Becky Barrentine 215 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 8 Lauren Black 216 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Victoria Buckley 177 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 8 Shailesh Chandra 217 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 8 Gang Chen 218 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Margaret Coppe 240 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Margaret Enders 219 Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes No 8 Alix Fox 423 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 8 Betty Gau 220 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 8 Lin Jensen 222 Abstain Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 8 Alan Levine 39 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 8 Brielle Meade 224 No Yes Abstain Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes On April 11,2022 ATM-30: STM2-3: ATM-34: Amend STM2-2: STM2-3- Amend STM2-4: Allow for Special Act- ATM-37: Lexington Terminate- ByLaw, Appropriate Select Board Planning Amend High School Debate: Hybrid to Complete to Call Board and Zoning Bylaw Attendance Check- Feasibility Previous Town Comprehensi Remote Town Town -Technical in:Check-in Study Question Meetings ve Plan Meeting Meeting Corrections Pct Name ID 8 James Osten 225 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Sanjay Padaki 38 Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes 8 Dahua Pan 324 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 8 Andrei Radulescu-Bann 226 Abstain Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 8 Sudhir Ranjan 422 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 8 Wendy Reasenberg 227 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Jessie Steigerwald 228 No Yes Yes Yes 8 Weidong Wang 230 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes — 9 Alice Adler 233 9 Mark Andersen 146 Yes No Yes Abstain Yes No Yes 9 Hemaben Bhatt 234 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 9 Victoria Blier 235 Yes Yes No Abstain Yes Yes No Yes 9 Scott Bokun 236 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Scott Burson 319 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 9 Jeanne Canale 237 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 9 Richard Canale 238 Yes Yes Verbally No Yes Yes Yes No Abstain 9 Rodney Cole 239 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 9 Thomas Fenn 241 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 9 Mollie Garberg 242 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain 9 Kimberly Hensle-Lowrance 320 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 9 Philip Jackson 243 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 9 Ethan Kiczek 433 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Sue Kingsbury 428 Yes Yes Abstain No Yes No Yes Abstain 9 Vineeta Kumar 92 9 Suzanne Lau 244 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 9 Janet Perry 176 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 9 1 Lisah Rhodes 12491 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 IMichaelSchroeder 14261 No Verbally INo Verbally jNoVerballNoVerbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally On April 11,2022 ATM-30: STM2-3: ATM-34: Amend STM2-2: STM2-3- Amend STM2-4: Allow for Special Act- ATM-37: Lexington Terminate- ByLaw, Appropriate Select Board Planning Amend High School Debate: Hybrid to Complete to Call Board and Zoning Bylaw Attendance Check- Feasibility Previous Town Comprehensi Remote Town Town -Technical in:Check-in Study Question Meetings ve Plan Meeting Meeting Corrections Pct Name ID 9 Thomas Shiple 250 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 134 177 96 166 167 171 50 164 11 1 71 10 2 7 119 3 18 2 13 5 9 3 9 7 163 180 180 181 178 181 178 174 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail Pass On April 13,2022 ATM-31: Amend General ATM-35- ATM-38: Bylaws- Amend- Amend Reporting, Creech: ATM-35: Zoning Bylaw Disclosing, Require a Amend and Zoning ATM-31- And Assessing Special ATM-35- ATM-35- Zoning Bylaw Map-128 Terminate- the Energy Permit Terminate- Terminate- -Open Space Attendance Spring Street Debate: and Water Instead of the Debate: Debate: Residential ATM-10e- Check-in: ATM-38-Lay- (Owner Previous Use of Large Proposed Site Previous Previous Development Reconsider- Check-in on-Table: Petition) Question Buildings Plan Review Question Question s Lay-on-Table: Pct Name ID 0 Mike Barrett 14 0 Suzanne Barry 13 Yes No Yes Abstain Yes No Abstain Abstain Yes No 0 Deborah Brown 6 Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain Abstain 0 Michelle Ciccolo 12 0 Jill Hai 11 Yes No Yes Abstain Yes No Abstain Yes Yes No 0 Douglas Lucente 7 Yes No Yes Abstain Yes No Abstain Abstain Yes No 0 Joe Pato 5 Yes No Yes Abstain Yes No Abstain Abstain Yes Abstain 0 Mark Sandeen 10 Yes No Yes Abstain Yes Yes No Abstain Yes Abstain 1 Lois Angelo 405 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 John Bartenstein 40 Yes No Yes Yes Yes 1 Sandhya Beebee 45 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No 1 Robert Cunha 47 Abstain No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No 1 Larry Freeman 48 Abstain No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Tanya Gisolfi-McCready 325 Abstain No Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes 1 Yifang Gong 301 Yes Yes Yes No Abstain Yes No No Yes 1 Stephanie Hsu 415 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No 1 Janet Kern 303 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 1 Jay Luker 414 Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No 1 Hongbin Luo 50 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 1 Eric Michelson 41 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Noah Michelson 173 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Meg Muckenhoupt 42 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Valerie Overton 52 Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes 1 Katherine Reynolds 402 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Verbally Yes Yes 1 John Rossi 54 Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No 1 Carol Sampson 56 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Abstain 1 Bella Tsvetkova 58 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 1 Albert Zabin 61 No No Yes Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes Verbally Yes Yes No 1 Judith Zabin 62 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 2 Avram Baskin 63 No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes 2 Marian Cohen 64 Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes On April 13,2022 ATM-31: Amend General ATM-35- ATM-38: Bylaws- Amend- Amend Reporting, Creech: ATM-35: Zoning Bylaw Disclosing, Require a Amend and Zoning ATM-31- And Assessing Special ATM-35- ATM-35- Zoning Bylaw Map-128 Terminate- the Energy Permit Terminate- Terminate- -Open Space Attendance Spring Street Debate: and Water Instead of the Debate: Debate: Residential ATM-10e- Check-in: ATM-38-Lay- (Owner Previous Use of Large Proposed Site Previous Previous Development Reconsider- Check-in on-Table: Petition) Question Buildings Plan Review Question Question s Lay-on-Table: Pct Name ID 2 Matthew Cohen 65 2 Matt Daggett 66 2 Rita Goldberg 69 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes 2 Ajay Joseph 70 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No 2 Barbara Katzenberg 305 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No 2 Ingrid Klimoff 71 Abstain No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Paul Lapointe 72 Abstain No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Peter Lee 73 2 Mark Manasas 74 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Barry Orenstein 31 Abstain No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 2 Ricki Pappo 77 Yes Abstain Yes No Yes Yes No No No Abstain 2 Syed Rizvi 78 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No 2 Kenneth Shine 79 No No Yes No No No Abstain Yes Yes No 2 Juan Stella 80 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 2 Jonathan Suber 81 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Rita Vachani 306 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 2 Emilie Webster 321 No Yes Verbally No Yes No No No Abstain Yes 2 Amy Weinstock 304 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No 2 Betsey Weiss 82 Yes No Yes No No Abstain Yes Yes No 3 Bronte Abraham 434 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Abstain 3 Courtney Apgar 83 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 3 Joshua Apgar 257 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Cynthia Arens 84 Yes Abstain Yes No Yes Yes No No Abstain Yes 3 Delanot Bastien 290 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Sallye Bleiberg 416 Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No 3 Christopher Buenrostro 417 3 Tom Diaz 427 Abstain No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No 3 Edward Dolan 309 Yes No Yes Abstain Yes No No No Yes Yes 3 Steven Heinrich 87 Yes No Yes No Abstain Yes Yes Yes No Yes 3 Jeanne Krieger 91 Yes No Yes No Yes Abstain No No Yes No 3 Henry Lau 93 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes On April 13,2022 ATM-31: Amend General ATM-35- ATM-38: Bylaws- Amend- Amend Reporting, Creech: ATM-35: Zoning Bylaw Disclosing, Require a Amend and Zoning ATM-31- And Assessing Special ATM-35- ATM-35- Zoning Bylaw Map-128 Terminate- the Energy Permit Terminate- Terminate- -Open Space Attendance Spring Street Debate: and Water Instead of the Debate: Debate: Residential ATM-10e- Check-in: ATM-38-Lay- (Owner Previous Use of Large Proposed Site Previous Previous Development Reconsider- Check-in on-Table: Petition) Question Buildings Plan Review Question Question s Lay-on-Table: Pct Name ID 3 Rena Maliszewski 94 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes 3 Amelia ODonnell 307 Abstain Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No 3 Glenn Parker 37 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 3 Letha Prestbo 96 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No 3 Robert Rotberg 97 Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No Yes 3 Michael Schanbacher 98 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 3 Prashant Singh 308 3 Frank Smith 99 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 Stanley Yap 102 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Alessandro Alessandrini 103 4 Laura Atlee 311 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 4 Nyles Barnert 104 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Gloria Bloom 105 Yes Abstain Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes 4 Michael Boudett 124 No Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Lawrence Chan 107 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 4 Norman Cohen 108 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 4 Robert Cohen 109 4 Kathryn Colburn 110 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes 4 Katie Cutler 111 Abstain No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes 4 Eileen Jay 114 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Charles Lamb 115 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 4 Kathleen Lenihan 116 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes 4 Linda Liu 419 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 4 Wendy Manz 246 Yes No Verbally Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 4 Gerald Paul 119 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 4 Jenny Richlin 326 Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes 4 Kathryn Roy 420 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No 4 ISandra Shaw 120 Yes I No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 4 Nancy Shepard 121 Yes I No Yes Yes Yes Abstain No Yes Abstain No 4 Ruth Thomas 123 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain No 5 jAnil Ahuja 125 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes On April 13,2022 ATM-31: Amend General ATM-35- ATM-38: Bylaws- Amend- Amend Reporting, Creech: ATM-35: Zoning Bylaw Disclosing, Require a Amend and Zoning ATM-31- And Assessing Special ATM-35- ATM-35- Zoning Bylaw Map-128 Terminate- the Energy Permit Terminate- Terminate- -Open Space Attendance Spring Street Debate: and Water Instead of the Debate: Debate: Residential ATM-10e- Check-in: ATM-38-Lay- (Owner Previous Use of Large Proposed Site Previous Previous Development Reconsider- Check-in on-Table: Petition) Question Buildings Plan Review Question Question s Lay-on-Table: Pct Name ID 5 Robert Balaban 126 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes 5 Nancy Corcoran-Ronchetti 127 No Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally Yes Verbally No Verbally 5 Judy Crocker 128 No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 5 Irene Dondley 129 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 5 Marilyn Fenollosa 130 Yes Abstain Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Abstain 5 Andrew Friedlich 131 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No 5 Anthony Galaitsis 132 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 5 Sarah Higginbotham 313 Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No Abstain Yes 5 Salvador Jaramillo 322 Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Aneesha Karody 145 5 Steven Kaufman 134 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 5 Pamela Lyons 135 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Jerold Michelson 136 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 5 Rita Pandey 138 No Yes Yes Yes Abstain Abstain Yes Yes 5 Marc SaintLouis 139 Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes 5 Melanie Thompson 140 Yes No Yes Abstain Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 5 Masha Traber 141 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Lin Xu 143 No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Lily Yan 43 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 5 John Zhao 144 Abstain No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No 6 Sara BothwellAllen 147 Abstain No Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes 6 Margaret Counts-Klebe 149 No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 6 Jodia Finnagan 315 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 6 Andrea Fribush 151 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Abstain No Yes 6 Edmund Grant 152 Yes No Yes Yes Yes 6 Jonathan Himmel 153 Yes No Yes No Verbally Yes Yes No No No No 6 Frederic Johnson 154 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Abstain Yes 6 Mort Kahan 155 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 6 Jyotsna Kakullavarapu 259 Yes Abstain Yes Verbally Yes Yes Yes 6 Brian Kelley 156 No Yes Yes Abstain No Yes Yes Yes No 6 Rina Kodendera 158 Yes No Yes Abstain Yes Yes On April 13,2022 ATM-31: Amend General ATM-35- ATM-38: Bylaws- Amend- Amend Reporting, Creech: ATM-35: Zoning Bylaw Disclosing, Require a Amend and Zoning ATM-31- And Assessing Special ATM-35- ATM-35- Zoning Bylaw Map-128 Terminate- the Energy Permit Terminate- Terminate- -Open Space Attendance Spring Street Debate: and Water Instead of the Debate: Debate: Residential ATM-10e- Check-in: ATM-38-Lay- (Owner Previous Use of Large Proposed Site Previous Previous Development Reconsider- Check-in on-Table: Petition) Question Buildings Plan Review Question Question s Lay-on-Table: Pct Name ID 6 Innessa Manning 159 Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No 6 Bridger McGaw 160 Abstain No Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes 6 Dawn McKenna 161 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 6 Ramesh Nallavolu 314 6 Dinesh Patel 163 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 6 Deepika Sawhney 164 Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No 6 Taylor Singh 212 Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 6 Deborah Strod 165 Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes 6 Eran Strod 421 Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No 6 Vinita Verma 166 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No 7 Marsha Baker 194 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes 7 Christian Boutwell 148 Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No 7 Mary Burnell 196 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Abstain No Yes Yes Yes 7 Patricia Costello 197 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 7 Robert Creech 198 Yes Abstain Yes Abstain Yes Yes No No No Yes 7 Sara Cuthbertson 329 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 7 Harry Forsdick 200 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No 7 Mary Hamilton 201 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 7 Philip Hamilton 202 Abstain No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Stacey Hamilton 203 Yes No Yes Abstain Yes Yes Abstain Abstain Abstain No 7 Pam Hoffman 204 Yes No Yes Abstain Yes No No No Yes 7 David Kanter 267 Yes Abstain Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes 7 Vikas Kinger 205 7 Ravish Kumar 206 7 Samita Mandelia 207 7 Raul Marques-Pascual 208 Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Tina McBride 209 Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No 7 Leonard Morse-Fortier 317 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes 7 Robert Peters 210 Abstain No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 7 Umesh Shelat 211 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Pamela Tames 316 Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No Yes On April 13,2022 ATM-31: Amend General ATM-35- ATM-38: Bylaws- Amend- Amend Reporting, Creech: ATM-35: Zoning Bylaw Disclosing, Require a Amend and Zoning ATM-31- And Assessing Special ATM-35- ATM-35- Zoning Bylaw Map-128 Terminate- the Energy Permit Terminate- Terminate- -Open Space Attendance Spring Street Debate: and Water Instead of the Debate: Debate: Residential ATM-10e- Check-in: ATM-38-Lay- (Owner Previous Use of Large Proposed Site Previous Previous Development Reconsider- Check-in on-Table: Petition) Question Buildings Plan Review Question Question s Lay-on-Table: Pct Name ID 8 Robert Avallone 214 Abstain No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 8 Becky Barrentine 215 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 8 Lauren Black 216 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No 8 Victoria Buckley 177 Yes Abstain Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes 8 Shailesh Chandra 217 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No 8 Gang Chen 218 No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 8 Margaret Coppe 240 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 8 Margaret Enders 219 Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes 8 Alix Fox 423 Yes Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Abstain Yes 8 Betty Gau 220 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Abstain Yes 8 Lin Jensen 222 Abstain Abstain Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No 8 Alan Levine 39 No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No 8 Brielle Meade 224 No No Yes Yes Yes Abstain No Abstain No No 8 James Osten 225 Abstain No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 8 Sanjay Padaki 38 Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 8 Dahua Pan 324 Yes No No No No 8 Andrei Radulescu-Banu 226 Abstain No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No 8 Sudhir Ranjan 422 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No 8 Wendy Reasenberg 227 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Abstain Yes 8 Jessie Steigerwald 228 No Yes Abstain No Yes No No No No 8 Weidong Wang 230 Yes No Yes 9 Alice Adler 233 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Mark Andersen 146 No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No 9 Hemaben Bhatt 234 Abstain Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes 9 Victoria Blier 235 No Abstain No Yes No No No Yes No 9 Scott Bokun 236 No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 9 Scott Burson 319 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 9 Jeanne Canale 237 Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No Yes 9 Richard Canale 238 Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No Yes 9 Rodney Cole 239 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 9 Thomas Fenn 241 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Abstain No Yes Abstain No On April 13,2022 ATM-31: Amend General ATM-35- ATM-38: Bylaws- Amend- Amend Reporting, Creech: ATM-35: Zoning Bylaw Disclosing, Require a Amend and Zoning ATM-31- And Assessing Special ATM-35- ATM-35- Zoning Bylaw Map-128 Terminate- the Energy Permit Terminate- Terminate- -Open Space Attendance Spring Street Debate: and Water Instead of the Debate: Debate: Residential ATM-10e- Check-in: ATM-38-Lay- (Owner Previous Use of Large Proposed Site Previous Previous Development Reconsider- Check-in I on-Table: Petition) Question I Buildings Plan Review Question Question s Lay-on-Table: Pct Name ID 9 Mollie Garberg 242 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 Kimberly Hensle-Lowrance 320 9 Philip Jackson 243 Abstain Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No 9 Ethan Kiczek 433 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 9 Sue Kingsbury 428 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 9 Vineeta Kumar 92 9 Suzanne Lau 244 Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No 9 Janet Perry 176 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No 9 Usah Rhodes 249 No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 9 Michael Schroeder 426 Yes Verbally Yes Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally Yes Verbally No Verbally No Verbally No Verbally Yes Verbally 9 Thomas Shiple 250 Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No 131 21 169 111 164 70 78 97 110 80 8 141 6 50 5 94 80 60 47 79 21 14 2 14 4 8 10 8 13 7 160 176 177 175 173 172 168 165 170 166 Pass Fail Pass Pass Pass Fail Fail I Pass Pass Pass On April 25,2022 ATM- Reconsideration Attendance Check-in:Check-in 10e and 10f Pct Name ID 0 Mike Barrett 14 0 Suzanne Barry 13 Yes No 0 Deborah Brown 6 Abstain Abstain 0 Michelle Ciccolo 12 0 Jill Hai 11 Yes No 0 Douglas Lucente 7 Yes No 0 Joe Pato 5 Abstain Yes 0 Mark Sandeen 10 1 Lois Angelo 405 Yes Yes 1 lJohn Bartenstein 40 Yes No 1 Sandhya Beebee 45 Yes No 1 Robert Cunha 47 Yes No 1 Larry Freeman 48 Abstain Yes 1 Tanya Gisolfi-McCready 325 Abstain Yes 1 Yifang Gong 301 Yes Yes 1 Stephanie Hsu 415 Yes Yes 1 jJanet Kern 303 1 Yes No 1 Jay Luker 414 Yes No 1 Hongbin Luo 50 1 Eric Michelson 41 Yes No 1 Noah Michelson 173 Yes No 1 Meg Muckenhoupt 42 Yes No 1 Valerie Overton 52 Yes Yes 1 Katherine Reynolds 402 Yes No 1 John Rossi 54 Yes No 1 Carol Sampson 56 Yes No 1 Bella Tsvetkova 58 Yes Yes 1 Albert Zabin 61 Yes Verbally No 1 Judith Zabin 62 No 2 Avram Baskin 63 Yes Yes 2 Marian Cohen 64 Yes Yes 2 Matthew Cohen 65 No Yes 2 Matt Daggett 66 2 Rita Goldberg 69 Yes No 2 Ajay Joseph 70 Yes No 2 Barbara Katzenberg 305 Yes Abstain 2 Ingrid Klimoff 71 Abstain No 2 Paul Lapointe 72 Abstain No 2 Peter Lee 73 2 Mark Manasas 74 Yes No 2 Barry Orenstein 31 Abstain No 2 Ricki Pappo 77 No Yes 2 Syed Rizvi 78 2 Kenneth Shine 79 No Yes 2 jJuan Stella 80 Yes Yes 2 Jonathan Suber 81 No No 2 Rita Vachani 306 Yes No 2 Emilie Webster 321 Abstain Yes 2 Amy Weinstock 304 Yes No 2 Betsey Weiss 82 Yes No 3 Bronte Abraham 434 Yes No 3 Courtney Apgar 83 3 Joshua Apgar 257 Yes No 3 Cynthia Arens 84 Yes Yes 3 Delanot Bastien 290 Yes No 3 Sallye Bleiberg 416 Yes Yes 3 Christopher Buenrostro 417 Yes Abstain 3 Tom Diaz 427 No No 3 Edward Dolan 309 Yes No 3 Steven Heinrich 87 Yes No 3 Jeanne Krieger 91 Yes Verbally No 3 Henry Lau 93 3 Rena Maliszewski 94 Yes No 3 Amelia ODonnell 307 Yes Yes 3 Glenn Parker 37 Yes No 3 Letha Prestbo 96 Yes No 3 Robert Rotberg 97 Yes Yes 3 Michael Schanbacher 98 Yes No 3 Prashant Singh 308 3 Frank Smith 99 Yes No 3 Stanley Yap 102 No On April 25,2022 ATM- Reconsideration Attendance Check-in:Check-in 10e and 10f Pct Name ID 4 Alessandro Alessandrini 103 Yes Yes 4 Laura Atlee 311 Yes No 4 Nyles Barnert 104 Yes No 4 Gloria Bloom 105 Yes Yes 4 Michael Boudett 124 Yes No 4 Lawrence Chan 107 Yes No 4 Norman Cohen 108 Yes No 4 Robert Cohen 109 4 Kathryn Colburn 110 Yes Yes 4 Katie Cutler 111 4 Eileen Jay 114 Yes Yes 4 Charles Lamb 115 Yes No 4 Kathleen Lenihan 116 Yes No 4 Linda Liu 419 Yes No 4 Wendy Manz 246 Yes No 4 Gerald Paul 119 No Yes 4 jJenny Richlin 326 Yes Yes 4 Kathryn Roy 420 Yes No 4 Sandra Shaw 120 Yes No 4 Nancy Shepard 121 Yes No 4 Ruth Thomas 123 Yes Verbally 5 Anil Ahuja 125 Yes No 5 Robert Balaban 126 Yes No 5 Nancy Corcoran-Ronchetti 127 Yes Verbally Yes Verbally 5 Judy Crocker 128 Yes No 5 Irene Dondley 129 Yes No 5 Marilyn Fenollosa 130 Abstain No 5 Andrew Friedlich 131 Yes No 5 Anthony Galaitsis 132 5 Sarah Higginbotham 313 Yes Yes 5 Salvador Jaramillo 322 Yes Yes 5 Aneesha Karody 145 Yes Yes 5 Steven Kaufman 134 Yes No 5 Pamela Lyons 135 Yes No 5 Jerold Michelson 136 Yes No 5 Rita Pandey 138 No 5 Marc SaintLouis 139 Abstain Yes 5 Melanie Thompson 140 Yes Yes 5 Masha Traber 141 Yes No 5 Lin Xu 143 Yes No 5 Lily Yan 43 Yes Yes 5 John Zhao 144 No No 6 Sara BothwellAllen 147 Abstain Yes 6 Margaret Counts-Klebe 149 Yes Yes 6 IJodia Finnagan 315 Yes No 6 Andrea Fribush 151 Yes No 6 Edmund Grant 152 Yes No Verbally 6 Jonathan Himmel 153 Yes Yes 6 Frederic Johnson 154 Yes Yes Verbally 6 Mort Kahan 155 Yes Yes 6 Jyotsna Kakullavarapu 259 Yes No 6 Brian Kelley 156 Yes No 6 Rina Kodendera 158 Yes Abstain 6 Innessa Manning 159 Yes Yes 6 Bridger McGaw 160 Yes Yes 6 Dawn McKenna 161 Yes No 6 Ramesh Nallavolu 314 6 Dinesh Patel 163 Yes Yes 6 Deepika Sawhney 164 Yes No 6 ITaylor Singh 212 Yes Yes 6 Deborah Strod 165 Abstain No 6 Eran Strod 421 Yes Yes 6 Vinita Verma 166 No Yes 7 Marsha Baker 194 Yes No 7 Christian Boutwell 148 No No 7 Mary Burnell 196 Yes Yes 7 Patricia Costello 197 Yes Yes 7 Robert Creech 198 Yes Yes 7 Sara Cuthbertson 329 Yes No 7 Harry Forsdick 200 Yes No 7 Mary Hamilton 201 Yes Yes On April 25,2022 ATM- Reconsideration Attendance Check-in:Check-in 10e and 10f Pct Name ID 7 Philip Hamilton 202 7 Stacey Hamilton 203 Yes No 7 Pam Hoffman 204 Yes Yes 7 David Kanter 267 Yes No 7 Vikas Kinger 205 7 Ravish Kumar 206 7 Samita Mandelia 207 Yes Yes 7 Raul Marques-Pascual 208 Yes Yes 7 Tina McBride 209 Yes Yes 7 Leonard Morse-Fortier 317 Yes No 7 Robert Peters 210 Abstain No 7 Umesh Shelat 211 No Yes 7 Pamela Tames 316 Yes No 8 Robert Avallone 214 Yes No 8 Becky Barrentine 215 No 8 Lauren Black 216 Yes No 8 IVictoria Buckley 177 Yes Abstain 8 IShailesh Chandra 217 Yes Yes 8 Gang Chen 218 No 8 Margaret Coppe 240 Yes No 8 Margaret Enders 219 Yes No 8 Alix Fox 423 Yes Yes 8 Betty Gau 220 Yes Yes 8 Lin Jensen 222 Abstain Yes 8 jAlan Levine 39 No No 8 Brielle Meade 224 No Yes 8 James Osten 225 8 Sanjay Padaki 38 Yes No 8 Dahua Pan 324 Yes No 8 Andrei Radulescu-Banu 226 Abstain Yes 8 Sudhir Ranjan 422 Yes No 8 lWendy Reasenberg 227 No No 8 Jessie Steigerwald 228 Yes Yes 8 Weidong Wang 230 Yes Yes 9 Alice Adler 233 9 Mark Andersen 146 Yes No 9 Hemaben Bhatt 234 Abstain Yes 9 Victoria Blier 235 Yes 9 IScott Bo un 236 No No 9 Scott Burson 319 Yes No 9 Jeanne Canale 237 Yes Yes 9 Richard Canale 238 Yes Yes 9 Rodney Cole 239 Yes No 9 Thomas Fenn 241 No No 9 Mollie Garberg 242 No 9 Kimberly Hensle-Lowrance 320 Yes No 9 Philip Jackson 243 Yes No 9 Ethan Kiczek 433 Yes No 9 Sue Kingsbury 428 Yes No 9 Vineeta Kumar 92 Yes 9 Suzanne Lau 244 Yes Yes 9 Janet Perry 176 Yes No 9 Lisah Rhodes 249 No No 9 Michael Schroeder 426 Yes Verbally Yes Verbally 9 Thomas Shiple 250 Yes Yes 139 67 16 104 16 5 171 176 Pass Fail