HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-12-05 SB-min
Select Board Meeting
December 5, 2022
A remote participation meeting of the Lexington Select Board was called to order at 6:32 p.m. on
Monday, December 5, 2022 via hybrid meeting services. Ms. Hai, Chair; Mr. Lucente; Vice Chair, Mr.
Pato, Ms. Barry, and Mr. Sandeen were present, as well as Mr. Malloy, Town Manager; Ms. Axtell,
Deputy Town Manager; and Ms. Katzenback, Executive Clerk.
Ms. Hai stated that the meeting was being conducted via Zoom as posted, with the agenda on the Town’s
website.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None at this time.
SELECT BOARD MEMBER CONCERNS AND LIAISON REPORTS
1. Select Board Members Concerns and Liaison Reports
Ms. Hai stated that, Friday morning the Town hosted a group of representatives from the Massachusetts
Cultural Council, in furtherance of the Town's application for a Cultural Council or Cultural District
designation. There was a very robust presentation and results are expected in March.
DOCUMENTS: Correspondence Secretary Report - December 5, 2022
TOWN MANAGER REPORT
1. Town Manager Weekly Update
Mr. Malloy stated that Mike Cronin, Director of Public Facilities, and he will be attending the CPC
meeting this Thursday to talk about the Stone Building and the potential for a phased project. Also, the
Munroe Center for the Arts request to the CPC has increased from $3.3M to $8.5M.
The Board discussed hearing a proposal regarding charges for bulky items at the Transfer Station.
Ms. Hai noted that there was a recent decision out of the Attorney General's Office which has mandated
additional information on agenda headings.
DOCUMENTS: Weekly Update 12-2-22
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Application: Common Victualler License – WPF Holdco d/b/a When Pigs Fly Bread, 1756
Massachusetts Avenue
To approve a Common Victualler License for WPFHoldco d/b/a When Pigs Fly Bread, 1756
Massachusetts Avenue for the hours of 10:00am to 6:30pm Sunday through Saturday.
2. Application: Common Victualler License – 1686 Lexington Inc d/b/a Inspire Bowl n Tea,
1686 Massachusetts Avenue
To approve a Common Victualler License for 1686 Lexington Inc d/b/a Inspire Bowl n Tea, 1686
Massachusetts Avenue for the hours of 10:00am to 6:00pm Monday through Thursday; 10:00am to
7:00pm Fridays; 9:00am to 7:00pm Saturday through Sunday.
3. Battle Green Use Request – Lexington Historical Society – Historical Reenactment of
Lexington Tea Party
To approve the request of the Lexington Historical Society, in collaboration with Lexington Minute Men,
Inc. to use the Battle Green on Sunday, December 11, 2022 for the Lexington Minute Men to perform a
musket drill at 11:00am, as well as perform marching and other demonstrations on the Common between
11:00am to 1:00pm as outlined in the attached request letter.
DOCUMENTS: Battle Green Request for Lexington Minute Men 2022 Musket Drill as Part of
Lexington Tea Burning Event, Town Manager Approval Letter for Use of Visitors Center Lawn for
Lexington Tea Burning Reenactment Event
4. 2023 Liquor License Renewals
To approve the following 2023 Annual Liquor License Renewals:
2023 LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS - ALL ALCOHOL RESTAURANTS
Bertucci’s - 1777 Massachusetts Avenue
Love at First Bite - 1710 Massachusetts Avenue
Revolution Hall - 3 Maguire Road
2023 LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS WINE/MALT RESTAURANTS
Daikanyama - 43 Waltham Street
2023 LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS PACKAGE STORES
Art's Specialties - 1666 Massachusetts Avenue, Unit H Berman’s - 55 Massachusetts Avenue
Lexington Wine & Spirits - 186 Bedford Street Lexington Liquors - 7 Depot Square
Vinebrook Bottle - 131 Massachusetts Avenue Whiskey & Wine - 55 Bedford Street
2023 LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS CLUBS
Lexington Golf Club - 55 Hill Street Lexington Elks - 959 Waltham Street
5. 2023 Class I/II/III License Renewals
To approve the 2023 Annual Class I/II/III License Renewals for the following businesses:
CLASS I
Lexington Toyota, Inc. - 409 Massachusetts Avenue
CLASS II
A to Z Auto Wholesale - 20 Vine Street Mabuchi Motorcars - 401 Lowell Street
Minutemen Auto Haus - 6 Fulton Road
CLASS III
John P. Carroll Company, Inc. - 700 Waltham Street
6. 2023 Common Carrier License Renewals
To approve the 2023 Annual Common Carrier License Renewals for the following business to operate the
Lexpress buses:
COMMON CARRIER
M+L Transit Systems Inc. #160 - 60 Olympia Avenue, Woburn
M+L Transit Systems Inc. #161 - 60 Olympia Avenue, Woburn
M+L Transit Systems Inc. #162 - 60 Olympia Avenue, Woburn
M+L Transit Systems Inc. #163 - 60 Olympia Avenue, Woburn
7. 2023 Common Victualler License Renewals
To approve the 2023 Annual Common Victualler License Renewals for the following businesses:
COMMON VICTUALLER
Bertucci's - 1777 Massachusetts Avenue
Bruegger's Bagels #3711 - 413 Waltham Street Crust & Curry- 321 Marrett Road
Daikanyama Japanese Cuisine - 43 Waltham Street Fiorella's Trattoria - 25 Waltham Street
il Casale - 1727 Massachusetts Avenue
Lexington House of Pizza - 399 Lowell Street
Love at First Bite Thai Kitchen - 1710 Massachusetts Avenue
Mario's Italian Restaurant - 1733 Massachusetts Avenue
McDonald's - 690 Marrett Road
Peet's Coffee & Tea - 1749 Massachusetts Avenue
Qdoba Mexican Eats - 46 Bedford Street
Revolution Hall - 3 Maguire Road
Royal India Bistro - 7 Meriam Street
The Upper Crust - 41 Waltham Street
Via Lago Inc. - 1845 Massachusetts Avenue
Wicked Bagel - 171 Massachusetts Avenue
8. 2023 Entertainment License Renewals
To approve the 2023 Annual Entertainment License Renewals for the following businesses:
ENTERTAINMENT
Bertucci's - 1777 Massachusetts Avenue
Crust & Curry - 321 Marrett Road
il Casale - 1727 Massachusetts Avenue
Love at First Bite Thai Kitchen - 1710 Massachusetts Avenue
Revolution Hall - 3 Maguire Road
The Upper Crust - 41 Waltham Street
Via Lago Inc. - 1845 Massachusetts Avenue
VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve the
Consent Agenda.
ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION
1. Discuss and Approve American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Requests
Mr. Malloy explained that the five items up for consideration tonight are additional small business
assistance, an electric trolley, LexHAB’s request to purchase a house, increasing inclusion through
technology, and the Fire Department and Emergency Management respiratory protection. The Board
agreed to hear from each request.
Sandhya Iyer, Economic Development Director, explained that some of the Town’s businesses feel that
they still need some assistance to get back to a level where they can advertise and market better and get
more foot traffic. The other category is businesses that do not have the means to pay rent and did would
like some rent relief from property owners. The last category is for additional businesses, such as non-
profits.
In response to a question from Mr. Lucente, Ms. Iyer stated that she has five businesses currently waiting
for funding. Three of these are new businesses and two are repeats. She asked if this funding could also
be used to bring new small businesses into Town.
In response to a question from Mr. Sandeen regarding the criteria for these requests, Ms. Iyer stated that
the businesses’ annual revenue has to be below $1.5M. The business must also show significant loss of
revenue due to COVID, and if the business is on the first floor, how the Center streetscape construction
project directly affected their foot traffic. Businesses are also ranked based on whether they are veteran-
owned, minority-owned, and women-owned businesses. Mr. Sandeen asked if the qualifications include a
test for determining whether this funding will be material in keeping the business open. Ms. Iyer noted
that businesses submitted a report with additional information after three months of the program and a
majority stated that the funding helped them to not have to shut down.
Ms. Hai noted that an additional funding request is difficult as small business assistance has already
amounted to approximately 10% of total ARPA spending, when including the pop up. She stated that she
might feel more comfortable altering or forgoing certain fees, as a more uniform measure.
Mr. Pato stated that he supports this proposal for additional funding. Encouraging vitality in the
community broadly is essential and is a direct consequence of turndowns due to COVID. He would agree
with a separate bucket of funding to alter certain fees, such as sidewalk fees.
In response to a question from Ms. Hai, Ms. Iyer stated that, during the first three rounds of assistance she
reached out to local businesses to see if funding was needed; at this time, she is waiting for businesses to
reach out to her. Ms. Hai stated that she would feel better if a more concerted effort was being made to
make sure at least each business has had one outreach.
Mr. Lucente agreed that letters should be sent to the small businesses in Town. He noted that he would
like to see those businesses already in Town supported, before trying to bring in new businesses or fill
empty spaces.
Ms. Barry agreed that outreach needs to be broader. She also agreed that funding for new businesses
should be considered through a separate ARPA request.
Mr. Sandeen stated that he would like to be more proactive in assessing that these funds will make a
material impact on these businesses, instead of hearing about this after the fact.
Ms. Hai stated that she would like to see outreach to less traveled and less populated areas of Town for
this funding.
VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve the
$500,000 request for additional small business assistance out of the existing ARPA allocation.
Casey Hagerty, Economic Development Coordinator, stated that the request for the electric trolley is now
$550,000, which includes the trolley and a level two charger. The trolley is planned to be stored at the
Composting Facility on Hartwell Ave. overnight and throughout the winter. Bidirectional charging is not
recommended at this time, but there may be an option in the future. In working with the Sustainability
Officer, there are three different rebate options that this project is potentially eligible for. As a condition
of the bid, one of the requirements would be helping the Town research and secure any additional federal
or local grants and rebates that may be available.
In response to a question from Ms. Barry, Ms. Hagerty stated that staff is examining the possibility of
using Lexpress, if the trolley were to ever be down for a day.
Mr. Sandeen noted that an entire fleet of vehicles could be electrified for the $340,000 extra this would
cost. While he loves the idea of an electric trolley, he thinks the Town could likely do better from a cost
versus emissions saved by using that money to electrify other vehicles. He stated that he believes the
Town would be better off waiting to electrify the trolley as bidirectional charging is not available today
and electric vehicle costs may eventually come down.
In response to a question from Mr. Malloy, Ms. Hagerty stated that there are gas trollies, diesel trollies,
and a gasoline-electric hybrid on a Ford F53 chassis. The hybrid option has a lead time of approximately
seven months. An electric trolley would likely be available for the 2024 season. Mr. Malloy asked if the
Board would want to consider a hybrid vehicle.
Ms. Hai suggested extending the current contract for one year, as there seems to be a need for more
information prior to an additional purchase. This could be reviewed again at the next quarterly review.
The Board agreed.
Dawn McKenna, 9 Hancock Street, noted that the current trolley is 15 years old. She stated that what the
trolley looks and feels like is part of the marketing for it. Currently, the trolley is only running Friday
through Monday, twice each day. She requested that the Board restore the funding to the Liberty Ride
Trolley Fund and Visitor Center.
Melinda Walker, 14 Larchmont Lane, noted that she was not recognized prior to the vote on the last item.
She stated that she believes recognition of members of the public has been a problem. She noted that the
Town of Arlington set up a Housing Stabilization Program to help renters as a result of the hardships
encountered due to COVID. She stated it is unfortunate that Lexington did not consider a similar program
through ARPA funds.
Mr. Lucente noted that the Fund for Lexington and Human Services Department both have funding
available for rental assistance.
Sarah Morrison, Executive Director of LexHAB, stated that the next request for funding is an additional
$400,000 to cover the balance on a house previously prefunded with $315,000.
There was no public comment at this time.
VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve the
$400,000 request from LexHAB for furtherance of the purchase of property that will be addressed in the
next item, out of the existing ARPA allocation.
Ms. Hai stated that the next request is $4,000 for Recreation inclusionary programming. It was noted that
this program was piloted in the fall with unbelievable success. These additional technology pieces would
allow for servicing of out-of-school time programs throughout the school year, as well as throughout the
summer.
There was no public comment at this time.
VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve the
$4,000 request for Recreation for increasing inclusion through technology, out of the existing ARPA
allocation.
The next request is for Fire Department and Emergency Management respiratory protection.
There was no public comment at this time.
VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve the
$40,000 request by the Lexington Fire Department for emergency management respirator protection, out
of the existing ARPA allocation.
Ms. Hai noted that the next set of items are ones not recommended by the Town Manager, either for not
meeting the Board’s nexus criteria or for other reasons. The first is the depot bus shelter at Emery Park.
Mr. Pato stated that he believes this does meet the Board’s criteria. Increasing the attractiveness of public
transportation will both help economic vitality and help induce more people to ride. The Town is long
overdue to place a shelter here, which was part of the funding associated with the Depot.
Ms. Hai agreed that there is a nexus, in helping to bring economic development back into the Center.
Pamela Lyons, Transportation Advisory Committee, stated that the pricing of $57,000 does seem high.
This is due to a 30% contingency fee, as recommended by the Town Engineer. The actual pricing was
roughly $40,000 for the structure and preparation of the landing pad.
Mr. Sandeen agreed with a nexus for this item and noted that of the Board’s goals is to increase access to
public transportation. One bus shelter is a good start, but more are likely needed.
VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve up to
$58,000 for the depot bus shelter at Emery Park, out of the existing ARPA allocation.
Ms. Hai noted that, regarding the next two requests on the list, it is Town Counsel’s opinion that the
Board cannot allocate funds for an unknown unknown purchase, the timing of which is also unknown,
and which may extend beyond the duration of the allowable expenditure of ARPA funding. Therefore,
these items will not be addressed at this time.
In response to a question from Mr. Sandeen, Town Counsel Makarios stated that creation of affordable
housing, such as acquisitions, buying down debt, buying restrictions, etc., is permissible with ARPA
funds. Setting aside funding into a Trust is not permissible.
Ms. Hai stated that the next item is a public facilities air quality monitoring system.
Mr. Sandeen stated that he was hoping to see another proposal that actually allowed Town staff to make
decisions based on air quality, which was not part of this original proposal. Mike Cronin stated that the
current monitoring system has devices in various components of the building. There is a database that
accumulates the information, but it does not save this over a period of time, and this is not downloadable
to a database for public consumption. Mr. Sandeen stated that he would prefer a system that provides data
on an ongoing basis, which is integrated with a building management system.
The Board did not move forward with this request at this time.
Mr. Lucente stated that he would like the Board to consider the Muzzey reuse item. Mr. Malloy stated
that this project continues to be worked by staff.
Ms. Hai requested that staff consider allocating additional funds for hybrid meeting technology.
DOCUMENTS: ARPA Spreadsheet Updated 12-2-22, Liberty Ride Presentation, NewDPWRequest,
New Economic Development Request
2. Approve Lexington Housing Assistance Board (LexHAB) to Purchase 9 Kimball Road
Ms. Hai explained that enabling legislation for LexHAB requires Select Board approval of the acquisition
of real property. It also requires that Town Counsel approve all documents related to such a purchase.
Sarah Morrison, Executive Director of LexHAB, explained that the group has been looking to purchase
single-family homes and properties for quite a while. This is the first one that has met the requirements, is
a good investment, and meets the needs of future tenants.
VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve
LexHAB's acquisition of real property located at 9 Kimball Road, subject to any comments from Town
Counsel on the closing documents being satisfactorily addressed.
DOCUMENTS: Purchase and Sale Agreement - 9 Kimball Road, Promissory Note - 9 Kimball Road
3. Update on Spending of Opioid Settlement
Joanne Belanger, Director of Public Health, explained that the settlement was approved at Town Meeting.
She explained that the next steps will be to sit down with other departments and discuss ways to
collaborate with existing programs and groups. Stakeholders and community partners will also be
consulted.
Mr. Lucente suggested an advisory group moving forward.
Ms. Barry suggested that members of the public with experience in this area get in touch with Ms.
Belanger.
DOCUMENTS: Opioid Settlement Presentation
4. Discuss Potential Uses for Vacant Town-Owned Properties
It was noted that the Town owns approximately 300+/- parcels of vacant land. The Town has recently
been approached by a private property owner as to whether the Town would be interested in leasing this
land to install a solar field and/or to purchase electricity from a solar company through a PPA. At the
same time, there are potential affordable housing, recreation, and other projects that could be undertaken
on Town property. The Board can discuss what approach it would like to take to investigate the potential
uses and how to develop recommendations for projects to bring forward.
Mr. Lucente suggested that the list of properties include attributes for each.
Mr. Malloy stated that he can prioritize the list as to parcels that are already protected open space or
parcels which potentially warrant designation as parks. Regarding the solar component, Sustainable
Lexington is beginning to do an evaluation of the identified parcels, as to which ones might work for a
solar field.
Mr. Sandeen agreed that there is value in conducting this survey. Mr. Sandeen stated that he believes
Sustainable Lexington is not looking at vacant lots, but at areas with impervious surfaces, such as parking
lots, and rooftops.
5. Discuss Updating Stone Building Deed Naming the Select Board as the Decision- Making
Body
Ms. Hai explained that the Cary Library Trustees are asking that the Town pursue an amendment to the
deed restriction included in the 1892 sale of the Ellen Stone Building to the Town, which stipulates that it
is to be held and maintained under the direction and management of the Trustees of the Cary Library. As
the Town and the Library have grown over the intervening 130 years, this arrangement no longer fits
within the work of the Library, which operates one of the busiest libraries in the network. The Cary
Library Trustees voted to request that the Town pursue an amendment to the Stone Building deed,
removing Cary Library Trustees from 'direction and management' of the building.
Mr. Makarios noted that the request is only to turn over custody of the building to the Select Board, as
opposed to the Trustees. The uses of the building are still going to be restricted as they are in the Trust
documents, which are, generally speaking, for educational and Library services.
There was discussion regarding the deed restriction uses and that these will still be maintained through
this request.
VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve the
request of the Cary Memorial Library Trustees to seek legal modification of the deed of the Ellen Stone
Building replacing the Select Board for the Library Trustees for purposes of the clause requiring the
building be held and maintained under the direction and management of the Trustees of Cary Library.
DOCUMENTS: Stone Building Deed, 2022.05.18 Stone Building Decision Making Outline
The Board took a five-minute recess.
6. Review and Approve Parking Enforcement in Lexington Center
It was noted that the Town has not been enforcing parking meters in the Center and, at this time, has
expended funds to replace the parking meter heads. The Board is awaiting comment from the Center
th
Committee and the Parking Management Group. The Board will take this item up at its December 19
meeting.
Mr. Pato requested information regarding parking turnover and revenues to maintain the parking lots into
the future.
Mr. Lucente stated that he would like to see information regarding utilization of the senior parking
program. He stated that a public information plan, if enforcement is agreed upon, will be important.
7. Review and Approve Sidewalk Rentals to Restaurants in Lexington Center
Mr. Malloy explained that the Town charged businesses for the use of the sidewalks up until the
pandemic started and, as a means to help the businesses, the Select Board requested that to temporarily
stopped charging. As there are maintenance costs associated with the Center area, costs were examined to
determine what the Town will need to provide notice to businesses for the 2023 season. In checking with
several communities around Lexington, very few charge fees. Arlington and Needham do charge fees, but
both were significantly lower than Lexington's fees. This will be considered by the Center Committee on
thth
December 8 and by the Select Board again on the 19 for a vote.
8. Discuss Formation of Ad Hoc Transportation Committee
Mr. Malloy explained that, at the last Select Board meeting, the Board and Town Manager discussed the
cost/revenues of providing the Lexpress bus service and the Transportation Department. He
recommended creation of an Ad Hoc Committee to review the future of the Lexpress bus service in a
timely manner for the FY25 budget process. The Select Board indicated an interest in reviewing a charge
for such a Committee and he has drafted a charge for the Committee for review.
Ms. Hai noted that the membership, seems heavily weighted towards business interests. She suggested
changing the Economic Development Director or designee, to the Human Services Director or designee.
She also suggested a length of term to be one year, or completion of work.
Mr. Sandeen stated that he is unclear as to why another Committee is needed for this review. He
suggested that the Transportation Advisory Committee be asked for its opinion first. Mr. Malloy stated
that he believes an ad hoc committee makes sense because the Transportation Advisory Committee is
overly dedicated to the Lexpress service, as it is. The Town Manager believes that having business
interests and someone who deals with the Town finances review the bus service makes sense. One
member of the Transportation Advisory Committee has been included in the proposed membership.
Mr. Pato stated that he believes the Transportation Manager should be either staffed or appointed to this
Committee, in order to take advantage of existing knowledge.
Ms. Barry stated that the members section language needs to be made gender neutral. She stated that she
is unclear if a Select Board member should be included on the Committee. She recommended that
someone from the senior community be included in the representation. She suggested that explicit dates
for reporting be included.
Mr. Sandeen stated that, if this Committee is to move forward, he would suggest the charter be focused on
what is required to run a successful service, such as considering frequency of service and duration of
service including start times. He suggested that staff consider eliminating Lexpress fees prior to the
committee’s formation so that the committee could have hard data to review when it is formed.
Pamela Lyons, 51 Grant Street, urged the Board to send this to the Transportation Advisory Committee.
This group has previously addressed many of these points and has institutional knowledge on the subject.
Ms. Barrett noted that she would like to see some other groups included in this conversation, to review
the array of data available. She echoed Ms. Lyons comments regarding not reinventing the wheel.
Mr. Malloy stated that an independent review can bring a lot of validity to a review of a service being
provided.
Bridger McGaw, Precinct 6, and Vice Chair of the Economic Development Committee, stated that the
reality is that the transportation infrastructure is much broader than the 128 Business Council and the
operating environment for Lexpress. Recent MOUs, negotiations, and considerations over the past years
showcase that the Town is not thinking holistically about how transportation is funded and operated. He
urged widening this conversation to additional stakeholders in the Town and development community.
Dawn McKenna, 9 Hancock Street, agreed with the idea to use the Transportation Advisory Committee,
but also agreed with the additional of other stakeholders.
The Board agreed to bring back the committee charge to a future meeting.
DOCUMENTS: Ad Hoc Transportation Committee Charge DRAFT
ADJOURN
VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 4-0 to adjourn the
meeting at 9:16pm.
A true record; Attest:
Kristan Patenaude
Recording Secretary